Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | ResultMaps | Latest OSM discussions | Autoreload 5:00 min | Page limited to max. 500 changesets
13 changesets created by rojganes have been discussed with 9 replies of this contributor
Participated changeset discussions | More details | Discussions (Include blocked users) | Discussions without answer | Discussions without own answer | RSS feed
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
109496235
by rojganes
@ 2021-08-11 06:16		12021-08-18 18:56EricJRW
♦3		 Hi @rojganes, I'm curious about something. In cases where a subdivision has a gate, and that gate is open during the day, but (I assume) closed at night, wouldn't the access type be more accurate as "Permissive"? This has been my assumption, and as I find areas like this, I have ...
22021-08-18 18:58EricJRW
♦3		 PS. I read the info at your link. That's a very cool data source for OSM.
32021-08-19 10:09abvincen
♦34		 Hi,

Thank you for leaving a note on my changeset. "Permissive" is an inappropriate tag to add here, this is a private community with privately owned roads. Permissive access may allow general traffic from Waters Edge Drive to Meadowlark Lane via this private community since it acts as ...
42021-08-20 19:15EricJRW
♦3		 Thank you for this info. I will make the change. EW
106132232
by rojganes
@ 2021-06-10 06:29		12021-06-10 11:46jleedev
♦299		 This road is certainly named "Lysle Avenue". Some street signs omit the suffix, but that's not the proper name.
22021-06-11 09:42abvincen
♦34		 Hi,

Thank you for providing the information.
Apologies for editing the suffix of the Roadname,I've made the necessary changes in the changeset (#106203600).
Looking forward to learn more from you!

Regards,
abvincen
---

Published using OSMCha: htt...
68660770
by rojganes
@ 2019-03-29 10:57		12021-04-04 15:19DUGA
♦550		 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680308539

It is incorrect, the parking aisle never connects to the fire lane (main entrance/exit service road)
22021-04-05 06:49rojganes Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the misalignment of the road, will make sure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
rojganes
99511736
by rojganes
@ 2021-02-18 09:51		12021-02-18 16:00ezekielf
♦87		 I believe this change should be reverted. A paved road is visible on the NAIP imagery (the newest in this area), not a dirt track. Looks like a new development is being build.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99511736
22021-02-19 08:44rojganes Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit and providing the information about the area, I've made the necessary changes in the changeset(# 99577199). Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
rojganes.
32021-02-19 21:01ezekielf
♦87		 Thank you!
97539914
by rojganes
@ 2021-01-15 07:38		12021-01-15 11:04jleedev
♦299		 The bing streetside imagery indicates that North 4th Street is oneway all the way to Hamilton Avenue, so I've replaced the turn restriction.
22021-01-18 06:05rojganes Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the miss in bing streetside imagery. Will ensure not to repeat such mistakes, Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
rojganes.
95300148
by rojganes
@ 2020-12-04 14:18		12020-12-04 21:13TravGW
♦355		 Ok so this is going to take some explaining. First of all the imagery your are using (Bing in this case) is outdated. Here in the vast brush lands of Texas most imagery will be many years out of date. You best bet is to choose Texas NAIP Imagery 2018 or the Maxar Imagery. Sometimes Maxar will be the...
22020-12-07 05:40rojganes Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit and the information about the area. I've made the necessary changes according to your information under changeset(#95394799). Will follow the same going forward. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
Rojganes.
90143855
by rojganes
@ 2020-08-30 12:23		12020-08-30 12:37rojganes Apologies for using internal terminology on OSM, the correct comment for the changeset is Added driveway #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
85089611
by rojganes
@ 2020-05-12 13:27		12020-05-12 13:34rojganes Hi,

Please find the updated comment "Added Height Restriction" for the Changeset: 85089611.

Regards,
Rojganes.
83976536
by rojganes
@ 2020-04-23 05:48		12020-04-24 00:34chachafish
♦462		 Howdy. Thank you for your additions to the map. Did you mean to put a space between the two words in the name here?
22020-04-27 07:27rojganes Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the mistake. I've made the changes under changeset(#84178491). I Will ensure not to repeat the error again. Looking forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
rojganes.
32020-04-27 16:51chachafish
♦462		 Thanks, buddy :)
69893881
by rojganes
@ 2019-05-05 04:17		12019-10-13 22:04freebeer
♦1,598		 hallo amazon,

it has happened here too.

by using the iD editor to add a turn restriction, you have again introduced buggy map data by duplicating part of the way starting at this (buggy) relation.

are you able to fix this? i fixed the last time i reported this, but i will not have the time...
22019-10-16 06:43rojganes Hi,

Thanks for your comments. I've fixed this duplicate under changeset #75754019. We are resolving such errors in a reactive manner. Request you to flag them if you notice any such errors, please don't fix them. As most of our data backup is linked to iD, we are unable to switch the ed...
32019-10-20 13:43freebeer
♦1,598		 looks good. i was worried that the newly-added overlapping road was lacking connectivity to two sets of pedestrian crossings, but josm worked with the old segment. there were no other conflicts as far as differences between the overlapping ways here, as there were in the previous overlap where i n...
42019-10-22 06:49rojganes Hi,
Thanks for confirming. Looking forward to learning from you.

Regards,
rojganes
75269521
by rojganes
@ 2019-10-04 08:56		12019-10-04 18:30user_5359
♦20,423		 Hello! A restriction relation must have three (or more) roles (from, to, via), see relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9961760.

22019-10-10 09:10rojganes Hi,

Thanks for your suggestion.I have fixed this changeset # 75499765.
Let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
rojganes
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75269521
75242184
by rojganes
@ 2019-10-03 15:38		12019-10-03 18:03user_5359
♦20,423		 Hello! A restriction relation must have three (or more) roles (from, to, via), see your relation.
22019-10-04 08:57rojganes Hi,

Thanks for your suggestion.I have fixed this changeset #75269521.
Let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
rojganes.
72651815
by rojganes
@ 2019-07-25 15:29		12019-07-28 19:32sannkc
♦106		 Hello! I was reviewing some St. Louis edits and happened to see this changeset. I can see what prompted the change. There's definitely a sign that prohibits commercial vehicles from accessing the street unless making deliveries.

What I'm unsure about is the access=destination tag. That ...
22019-07-31 18:17gseethar
♦67		 Hi Sannkc,

Thanks a lot for your suggestion. We will definitely take this up and perform our analysis and get back to you at the earliest.

Please continue to provide your valuable suggestions that will help us further improve our edits.

Regards,
Ganesh