| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74304891 by rsakunth @ 2019-09-10 11:32 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | rempshaener ♦1,439 | Added way does not exist. Neither in reality, nor in Maxar Imagery. Reverted changeset via #74315707. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rsakunth | Hi hydrogrisu,Thanks for looking into my edit. This edit was based on the GPS trace data of our driver partner. The roads in the vicinity had similar paving according to the imagery and hence I went ahead in making the road. However, I am in alignment with the deletion as per your local knowledg... | |
| 74274476 by rsakunth @ 2019-09-09 17:14 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! This is a very unfortunate change. Yes, this is a new development area and yet an existing footpath is partly used to map an access road. It would have been very desirable to add at least one key fixme='Please check if the path still exists'. I was now so free to delete and reconn... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rsakunth | Hi user_5359,Thank you for looking into my edit. I had made this edit based on the GPS trace of our driver partner. However, I am thankful to you for modifying the edit as per the local knowledge. Let me know in case there something more I can learn.RegardsRsakunth | |
| 74364151 by rsakunth @ 2019-09-11 16:40 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello, please check the access value for way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723842762 |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rsakunth | Hi User_5359,Thank you for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake. I have modified the edit (#74440736). I will be extremely careful going forward and would not repeat such mistake. Let me know in case you have any more suggestion.RegardsRsakunth | |
| 71068803 by rsakunth @ 2019-06-09 11:16 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Hello,What was the source of your motor_vehicle=yes change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264826475/history ?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rsakunth | Hi Andy,Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions. Changeset=72045515Regards,rsakunth | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,743 | Hi rsakunth,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 67923742 by rsakunth @ 2019-03-08 14:00 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Why do the service roads go through buildings? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rsakunth | Hi ndm,Thanks for making changes to the edit and we apologize for the delayed response. We used a different image while editing. the We will follow the same going forward while making such edit. Thanks for the updates.Regards, rsakunth. | |
| 67922399 by rsakunth @ 2019-03-08 13:21 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Why does the driveway go through a building? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | I've fixed this - you just need to modify the imagery offset - or use ESRI clarity | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | rsakunth | Hi ndm,Thanks for making changes to the edit. We will follow the same going forward while making such edit. Thanks for the updates.Regards,rsakunth. | |
| 68103138 by rsakunth @ 2019-03-13 15:04 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | sorcrosc ♦422 | Hi,I changed the tags of these relations because they blocked all traffic, not just heavy vehicles.Furthermore, these turn restrictions are the consequence of a weight limit on the roads and can usually be mapped simply by adding maxweight=7.5 to the way, probably maxweight:forward=7.5 if the ... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rsakunth | Hi,Thanks for the update and we apologize for the delayed response. We somehow missed adding weight restriction in the relation. Going forward we will add such restrictions.Regards,rsakunth | |
| 70961839 by rsakunth @ 2019-06-05 17:19 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | ndm ♦889 | I used ESRI clarity which is clearer - and have adjusted them to avoid buildings. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rsakunth | Hi,Thanks for changing the alignment of the road segments. We will follow the same suggestion going forward. Regards,rsakunth | |
| 69048747 by rsakunth @ 2019-04-09 14:31 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Constable ♦1,294 | Hi there, rsakunth. I do perfectly understand you may find those service roads (those you added) useful, but it'd be very important to also add a access restriction to them, otherwise they'll look like public service roads, which could be deceiving to map users and it's also is not co... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | rsakunth | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. We will follow the access restrictions going forward as per your suggestion. Please let us know if there are any other suggestions.Regards,rsakunth. | |
| 68061050 by rsakunth @ 2019-03-12 12:47 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | This looks like service roads go straight through playgrounds - see the pitch I added. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Thanks for looking into this ndm, the satellite imagery available in this location are not clear enough to identify it as a pitch. As per your comments I made the changes. Thanks again for your valuable feedback.Regards,Jothirnadh |