Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | ResultMaps | Latest OSM discussions | Autoreload 5:00 min | Page limited to max. 500 changesets
10 changesets created by rsakunth have been discussed with 9 replies of this contributor
Participated changeset discussions | More details | Discussions (Include blocked users) | Discussions without answer | Discussions without own answer | RSS feed
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
74304891
by rsakunth
@ 2019-09-10 11:32		12019-09-10 14:50rempshaener
♦1,150		 Added way does not exist. Neither in reality, nor in Maxar Imagery. Reverted changeset via #74315707.
22019-09-13 14:33rsakunth Hi hydrogrisu,

Thanks for looking into my edit. This edit was based on the GPS trace data of our driver partner. The roads in the vicinity had similar paving according to the imagery and hence I went ahead in making the road. However, I am in alignment with the deletion as per your local knowledg...
74274476
by rsakunth
@ 2019-09-09 17:14		12019-09-10 17:48user_5359
♦20,423		 Hello! This is a very unfortunate change. Yes, this is a new development area and yet an existing footpath is partly used to map an access road. It would have been very desirable to add at least one key fixme='Please check if the path still exists'.
I was now so free to delete and reconn...
22019-09-13 14:24rsakunth Hi user_5359,

Thank you for looking into my edit. I had made this edit based on the GPS trace of our driver partner. However, I am thankful to you for modifying the edit as per the local knowledge. Let me know in case there something more I can learn.

Regards
Rsakunth
74364151
by rsakunth
@ 2019-09-11 16:40		12019-09-11 17:02user_5359
♦20,423		 Hello, please check the access value for way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723842762
22019-09-13 14:18rsakunth Hi User_5359,

Thank you for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake. I have modified the edit (#74440736). I will be extremely careful going forward and would not repeat such mistake. Let me know in case you have any more suggestion.

Regards
Rsakunth
71068803
by rsakunth
@ 2019-06-09 11:16		12019-07-05 16:36SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 Hello,
What was the source of your motor_vehicle=yes change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264826475/history ?
Best Regards,
Andy
22019-07-09 09:18rsakunth Hi Andy,

Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions. Changeset=72045515

Regards,
rsakunth
32019-07-09 09:48SomeoneElse
♦13,568		 Hi rsakunth,
Thanks for that.
Best Regards,
Andy
67923742
by rsakunth
@ 2019-03-08 14:00		12019-03-08 21:29ndm
♦889		 Why do the service roads go through buildings?
22019-07-03 11:04rsakunth Hi ndm,

Thanks for making changes to the edit and we apologize for the delayed response. We used a different image while editing. the We will follow the same going forward while making such edit. Thanks for the updates.

Regards,
rsakunth.

67922399
by rsakunth
@ 2019-03-08 13:21		12019-03-08 21:30ndm
♦889		 Why does the driveway go through a building?
22019-03-11 23:56ndm
♦889		 I've fixed this - you just need to modify the imagery offset - or use ESRI clarity
32019-07-03 11:01rsakunth Hi ndm,

Thanks for making changes to the edit. We will follow the same going forward while making such edit. Thanks for the updates.

Regards,
rsakunth.
68103138
by rsakunth
@ 2019-03-13 15:04		12019-04-21 19:47sorcrosc
♦422		 Hi,
I changed the tags of these relations because they blocked all traffic, not just heavy vehicles.

Furthermore, these turn restrictions are the consequence of a weight limit on the roads and can usually be mapped simply by adding maxweight=7.5 to the way, probably maxweight:forward=7.5 if the ...
22019-07-03 10:54rsakunth Hi,

Thanks for the update and we apologize for the delayed response. We somehow missed adding weight restriction in the relation. Going forward we will add such restrictions.

Regards,
rsakunth
70961839
by rsakunth
@ 2019-06-05 17:19		12019-06-05 17:38ndm
♦889		 I used ESRI clarity which is clearer - and have adjusted them to avoid buildings.
22019-07-03 10:46rsakunth Hi,

Thanks for changing the alignment of the road segments. We will follow the same suggestion going forward.

Regards,
rsakunth
69048747
by rsakunth
@ 2019-04-09 14:31		12019-06-18 15:34Constable
♦1,294		 Hi there, rsakunth. I do perfectly understand you may find those service roads (those you added) useful, but it'd be very important to also add a access restriction to them, otherwise they'll look like public service roads, which could be deceiving to map users and it's also is not co...
22019-07-03 10:41rsakunth Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit. We will follow the access restrictions going forward as per your suggestion.

Please let us know if there are any other suggestions.

Regards,
rsakunth.
68061050
by rsakunth
@ 2019-03-12 12:47		12019-03-12 21:53ndm
♦889		 This looks like service roads go straight through playgrounds - see the pitch I added.
22019-03-13 11:34jguthula
♦65		 Thanks for looking into this ndm, the satellite imagery available in this location are not clear enough to identify it as a pitch. As per your comments I made the changes. Thanks again for your valuable feedback.

Regards,
Jothirnadh