| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59107699 by shravan91 @ 2018-05-19 17:45 | 1 | 2018-05-19 17:46 | shravan91 | This edit is not for #hotosm-project-4553 #OSM-CD |
| 52030282 by shravan91 @ 2017-09-14 08:52 | 1 | 2017-12-27 22:37 | IIVQ ♦141 | Hi Shravan, ik heb deze busrelatie verwijderd, omdat deze "test" heet. |
| 30232058 by shravan91 @ 2015-04-15 10:14 | 1 | 2016-01-13 20:35 | SomeoneElse ♦13,679 | As mapped, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270716541#map=19/51.33016/-0.55895 looks fairly implausible. It suggests that it is impossible to get from the footpath to the adjacent road for most of its length? |
| 30035064 by shravan91 @ 2015-04-07 09:43 | 1 | 2015-09-21 20:49 | SomeoneElse ♦13,679 | Just checking - are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33777910 joins http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266631527 here (in addition to the bollard at the east)? It's not really clear from the imagery. |
| 32001195 by shravan91 @ 2015-06-16 08:47 | 1 | 2015-06-16 12:59 | 4rch ♦138 | Hello shravan91,I've reverted the following Changesets for technical reasons (unclosed Multipolygon):#32001195#32001159#31999879Please take account of the OSMF guidelines on disputed boundaries: http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdfWest... |
| 2 | 2015-06-17 11:48 | shravan91 | Thanks 4arch for the links to this issue and reverting back the changes. | |
| 31914489 by shravan91 @ 2015-06-12 08:00 | 1 | 2015-06-12 08:00 | shravan91 | The sources are only:Bing, Mapbox Satellite, Map Feedback |
| 30526846 by shravan91 @ 2015-04-27 06:14 | 1 | 2015-04-27 06:20 | shravan91 | The comment on the changeset is not - %23hotosm-Nepal-Earthquake-1001It is - traced roads based on the customer feedback |
| 29723428 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-25 10:12 | 1 | 2015-04-08 00:06 | stevea ♦316 | Looks like you cracked open (disconnected) a (rather admittedly complex, I will concur) landuse=conservation multipolygon while editing around Camp Ben Lomond and Empire Grade a couple of weeks ago. As one of the original authors of this, I have fixed it. |
| 2 | 2015-04-08 07:36 | shravan91 | Thank you Stevea for the edit. I was working on the road connection and forgot to look at the polygon. Next time, I'll make sure that I don't make the same mistake again. | |
| 3 | 2015-04-09 19:52 | stevea ♦316 | Not a problem, took me just a couple of minutes. Thanks for your cooperation and good attitude. Go OSM! | |
| 30007236 by shravan91 @ 2015-04-06 06:08 | 1 | 2015-04-06 11:21 | zeromap ♦81 | Good correction. Unless there is a reason for an exception, you should always keep the title case for feature names or else it looks amateurish. I've corrected it in this changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30012853 |
| 2 | 2015-04-07 11:10 | shravan91 | Thank you for your clarification of the object name. In the future I will be more careful when making changes to the map. Looking forward to further cooperation. | |
| 30011407 by shravan91 @ 2015-04-06 10:02 | 1 | 2015-04-06 15:06 | will_p ♦149 | I'm puzzled by this edit. You have removed a short section of road on Belvoir Hill. The area is covered by trees on both the Bing and MapBox imagery, so what source did you use to decide the ground surveyed data was incorrect?Also, I've just reverted two of your other changesets: 30011... |
| 2 | 2015-04-07 06:09 | shravan91 | Thank you for the feedback. It was a very small change. Thank you for reverting back the change and fixing the road. | |
| 29901830 by shravan91 @ 2015-04-01 11:08 | 1 | 2015-04-01 12:03 | will_p ♦149 | I've reverted this change because it is incorrect. There is a barrier (wall or fence) at the end of Ossington Street preventing direct access to the path. The area in which you made this edit has been surveyed in some detail on the ground and if the ways did join up its very likely it would h... |
| 29444623 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-13 10:03 | 1 | 2015-03-27 22:34 | robert ♦234 | Are you sure about this? There's something that looks an awful lot like a road on the bing imagery I'm looking at and Ordnance Survey Locator seems to think this road's here http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=893570 |
| 2 | 2015-03-30 07:34 | shravan91 | We have reverted the changeset. Thanks for the update! | |
| 29747843 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-26 09:45 | 1 | 2015-03-26 10:21 | CloCkWeRX ♦344 | Ah thanks re these, I'm doing a lot for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/South_Australian_Roads and planning to come back and do a pass of 'way ends near other road', but all help is appreciated :) |
| 29446145 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-13 11:36 | 1 | 2015-03-13 11:37 | shravan91 | the comment is - Fixed unconnected road |
| 29420697 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-12 07:31 | 1 | 2015-03-12 07:31 | shravan91 | The comment is - Fixed unconnected road |
| 29420068 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-12 06:41 | 1 | 2015-03-12 06:42 | shravan91 | The comment is - Fixed unconnected Major road |
| 29403215 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-11 11:34 | 1 | 2015-03-11 11:36 | shravan91 | The comment is - FIxed road data |
| 29403185 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-11 11:33 | 1 | 2015-03-11 11:35 | shravan91 | The comment is - FIxed road data |
| 29403191 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-11 11:33 | 1 | 2015-03-11 11:35 | shravan91 | The comment is - FIxed road data |
| 29403207 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-11 11:34 | 1 | 2015-03-11 11:35 | shravan91 | The comment is - FIxed road data |
| 29403173 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-11 11:32 | 1 | 2015-03-11 11:35 | shravan91 | The comment is - FIxed road data |
| 29381808 by shravan91 @ 2015-03-10 11:02 | 1 | 2015-03-10 11:03 | shravan91 | Fixed unconnected road is the comment for the changeset. |
| 29037405 by shravan91 @ 2015-02-23 06:57 | 1 | 2015-03-09 14:11 | SomeoneElse ♦13,679 | Not sure what happened here - needs a survey. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/328671 . |
| 28789300 by shravan91 @ 2015-02-12 07:42 | 1 | 2015-03-09 14:04 | SomeoneElse ♦13,679 | Something's gone very wrong here but it needs a proper on-the-ground survey. I've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/328669 . |
| 2 | 2015-03-09 14:08 | shravan91 | Thanks for adding the note. Sounds good. | |
| 29041498 by shravan91 @ 2015-02-23 11:03 | 1 | 2015-02-23 13:34 | trigpoint ♦2,564 | Hi, how did you decide that Calder Close is crossed by the footpath, bing is clear enough to see that this is not the case however if there is a connection it is a footpath link. The detail is obscured by a tree and needs an on the ground survey, as detailed in my nearby note.What was your reason ... |
| 2 | 2015-03-02 05:25 | shravan91 | This was my oversight, thank you for fixing it. | |
| 28878169 by shravan91 @ 2015-02-16 06:24 | 1 | 2015-02-16 06:26 | shravan91 | The comment for the changeset is : "fixed unconnected major road" |
| 28877097 by shravan91 @ 2015-02-16 04:39 | 1 | 2015-02-16 04:42 | shravan91 | The comment for changeset is : Fixed an unconnected major road |
| 28608935 by shravan91 @ 2015-02-04 11:41 | 1 | 2015-02-04 11:44 | shravan91 | The Meerut-Pauri highway needs to be fixed, will be fixing the remaining part later. |
| 28607405 by shravan91 @ 2015-02-04 10:02 | 1 | 2015-02-04 10:04 | shravan91 | Deleted the road as the road doesn't really exist. |
| 27861551 by shravan91 @ 2015-01-02 12:31 | 1 | 2015-01-04 13:07 | SomeoneElse ♦13,679 | This changeset has a huge bounding box and a relatively meaningless changeset comment ("Fixed road data"). If this comes up in the changeset history for someone, how will they know what has been changed locally to them and why? |
| 2 | 2015-01-06 08:34 | shravan91 | Thank You for throwing a light on this issue. I will look into it. | |
| 3 | 2015-01-31 16:34 | maxolasersquad ♦93 | This has really caused a lot of problems with the roads in Saint Marks, FL US. There are now lots of roads on top of roads, with roads extending out beyond where they actually belong, overlapping existing roads. | |
| 4 | 2015-02-02 09:36 | shravan91 | Thanks for reporting, I reviewed the changeset and fixed all overlapping roads. | |
| 28249038 by shravan91 @ 2015-01-19 10:15 | 1 | 2015-01-21 11:42 | SomeoneElse ♦13,679 | This is a very wide changeset for a comment of "Fixed a highway intersecting a footpath". Was something else changed as well? |
| 2 | 2015-01-21 11:46 | shravan91 | This is, I will make sure it doesn't happen again. | |
| 3 | 2015-01-21 11:56 | SomeoneElse ♦13,679 | Sorry - what else was changed and where? What was the source? | |
| 4 | 2015-01-27 12:22 | shravan91 | Thank you for your feedback, this comment could indeed have been better. It should have been "Adding noded connections to intersecting road ways http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/?error=highwayhighway ". The source is as specified in the source field: "Mapbox Satellite; Bing". | |
| 5 | 2015-01-27 17:10 | SomeoneElse ♦13,679 | Whereabouts, geographically, did you make changes? It's a very wide bounding box, so difficult to say from that exactly what's changed, without trying to look at the changeset externally in something like osmhv or achavi. | |
| 6 | 2015-01-29 16:45 | shravan91 | Hey there, this was an accidentally mixed changeset, here are the two actual changes: added a node to intersection between road and cycleway: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3298200391 . Which contained accidentally a couple of buildings I added earlier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/44.08... | |
| 28484851 by shravan91 @ 2015-01-29 12:20 | 1 | 2015-01-29 12:22 | shravan91 | Aligned a road too. |
| 28162180 by shravan91 @ 2015-01-15 13:40 | 1 | 2015-01-15 13:41 | shravan91 | This is not a cemetery, but a Supermarket |