| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72877603 by shsahit @ 2019-08-01 02:01 ~ 6 years ago Active block | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | JohnPartington ♦1 | This is not Roewood Lane, it's a fork of Ecton Avenue |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | hemasvn ♦17 | Hi, [Responding on behalf of shsahit since the editor no more works for the organisation.] The edit was made based on Bing aerial imagery. Also, The Roewood lane was already existing as per OS Open data street view. Please feel free to improve the edits in case of any discrepancies. Thanks.... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | JohnPartington ♦1 | I'm not sure how to correct this, the name 'Roewood Lane' should be removed from this part of the map.A footpath further along is also incorrectly named as 'Roewood Lane' but I will comment on that separately. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | hemasvn ♦17 | Hi , I have removed the road name as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset: 106185751 for your reference. Always happy to learn from the community.Thanks | |
| 90655704 by shsahit @ 2020-09-09 15:54 ~ 5 years ago Active block | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | messpert ♦65 | But where is the gate? This is a private drive not open to the public.And, if I remember correctly, the surface is gravel, at least at the entrance. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | ravsjith ♦18 | Hi messpert,Replying on behalf of shsahit. thanks for checking into our edits. we have added the road based on the available resources. we have not modified the access as we do not have supporting evidence for it. thanks for improvising our edit quality. always happy to learn from the community... | |
| 91403240 by shsahit @ 2020-09-24 05:04 ~ 5 years ago Active block | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Cebderby ♦313 | Why is it that EVERY SINGLE ONE of your edits needs to be reworked to fix the bad way shape, bad alignment and sometimes bad tagging?Please use the best available imagery (typically the new sharp Bing imagery in many places), ALIGN IT to existing mapped features, LOOK AT the imagery to see the act... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | shsahit Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 74841776 by shsahit @ 2019-09-24 08:16 ~ 6 years ago Active block | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | tux67 ♦2,028 | Hi, you are adding a service road to a schoolyard. Usually public Motor Vehicle access is not allowed here. If the Amazon driver ignored that, this does not imply this is correct. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/chang... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | shsahit Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | My observations of amazon edits are leading me to believe that the GPS is not connected to the vehicle, but is contained in the handheld unit on which the driver ask the recipient to sign.When making edits based on gps traces please consider the the driver may have been walking for the last part... | |
| 73867255 by shsahit @ 2019-08-29 06:47 ~ 6 years ago Active block | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Hi, this edit has gone a bit wrong.There is no residential road here, it is a path. What sources were you using to make this edit?Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | shsahit Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 74336893 by shsahit @ 2019-09-11 06:10 ~ 6 years ago Active block | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | TheNet1996 ♦177 | Hi,please re-check your edit.You have created wrong connections of streets.Thanks and regardsMike |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | shsahit Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 74521659 by shsahit @ 2019-09-16 09:50 ~ 6 years ago Active block | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Nmxosm ♦343 | English version below. Hallo shsahit,vielen Dank für deine Änderungen. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass die Tore https://osm.org/node/6798949934 und https://osm.org/node/6798949933 sowohl Teil des highway=service als auch des highway=path sind. Unter der Annahme, dass der Bürgersteig... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Nmxosm ♦343 | Danke für die Korrektur. | |
| 72675500 by shsahit @ 2019-07-26 08:41 ~ 6 years ago Active block | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Thank you for this addition, it is clearly a new residential area.However when mapping please consider the existing mapping, in this case landuse, and adjust the residential area to incorporate this new development.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | shsahit Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |