Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | ResultMaps | Latest OSM discussions | Autoreload 5:00 min | Page limited to max. 500 changesets
8 changesets created by shsahit have been discussed with 5 replies of this contributor
Participated changeset discussions | More details | Discussions (Include blocked users) | Discussions without answer | Discussions without own answer | RSS feed
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
72877603
by shsahit
@ 2019-08-01 02:01
Active block		12021-06-09 11:40JohnPartington
♦1		 This is not Roewood Lane, it's a fork of Ecton Avenue
22021-06-10 15:20hemasvn
♦17		 Hi,
[Responding on behalf of shsahit since the editor no more works for the organisation.]
The edit was made based on Bing aerial imagery. Also, The Roewood lane was already existing as per OS Open data street view. Please feel free to improve the edits in case of any discrepancies.
Thanks.
...
32021-06-10 18:28JohnPartington
♦1		 I'm not sure how to correct this, the name 'Roewood Lane' should be removed from this part of the map.
A footpath further along is also incorrectly named as 'Roewood Lane' but I will comment on that separately.
42021-06-11 04:09hemasvn
♦17		 Hi ,
I have removed the road name as per your suggestion. Please find the changeset: 106185751 for your reference. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks
90655704
by shsahit
@ 2020-09-09 15:54
Active block		12020-12-27 22:49messpert
♦65		 But where is the gate? This is a private drive not open to the public.
And, if I remember correctly, the surface is gravel, at least at the entrance.
22020-12-28 14:47ravsjith
♦18		 Hi messpert,
Replying on behalf of shsahit. thanks for checking into our edits. we have added the road based on the available resources. we have not modified the access as we do not have supporting evidence for it. thanks for improvising our edit quality. always happy to learn from the community...
91403240
by shsahit
@ 2020-09-24 05:04
Active block		12020-09-24 08:52Cebderby
♦313		 Why is it that EVERY SINGLE ONE of your edits needs to be reworked to fix the bad way shape, bad alignment and sometimes bad tagging?
Please use the best available imagery (typically the new sharp Bing imagery in many places), ALIGN IT to existing mapped features, LOOK AT the imagery to see the act...
22020-09-24 13:13shsahit
Active block		 Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
74841776
by shsahit
@ 2019-09-24 08:16
Active block		12019-09-24 08:33tux67
♦1,998		 Hi, you are adding a service road to a schoolyard. Usually public Motor Vehicle access is not allowed here. If the Amazon driver ignored that, this does not imply this is correct.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/chang...
22019-09-24 09:20shsahit
Active block		 Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
32019-10-09 11:41trigpoint
♦2,503		 My observations of amazon edits are leading me to believe that the GPS is not connected to the vehicle, but is contained in the handheld unit on which the driver ask the recipient to sign.

When making edits based on gps traces please consider the the driver may have been walking for the last part...
73867255
by shsahit
@ 2019-08-29 06:47
Active block		12019-09-30 12:20trigpoint
♦2,503		 Hi, this edit has gone a bit wrong.

There is no residential road here, it is a path.

What sources were you using to make this edit?

Cheers Phil
22019-10-01 11:04shsahit
Active block		 Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
74336893
by shsahit
@ 2019-09-11 06:10
Active block		12019-09-12 23:54TheNet1996
♦177		 Hi,
please re-check your edit.
You have created wrong connections of streets.
Thanks and regards
Mike
22019-09-18 13:28shsahit
Active block		 Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
74521659
by shsahit
@ 2019-09-16 09:50
Active block		12019-09-17 09:51Nmxosm
♦343		 English version below.

Hallo shsahit,

vielen Dank für deine Änderungen. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass die Tore https://osm.org/node/6798949934 und https://osm.org/node/6798949933 sowohl Teil des highway=service als auch des highway=path sind. Unter der Annahme, dass der Bürgersteig...
22019-09-18 07:06Nmxosm
♦343		 Danke für die Korrektur.
72675500
by shsahit
@ 2019-07-26 08:41
Active block		12019-07-26 09:38trigpoint
♦2,503		 Thank you for this addition, it is clearly a new residential area.
However when mapping please consider the existing mapping, in this case landuse, and adjust the residential area to incorporate this new development.
Cheers Phil
22019-09-09 13:25shsahit
Active block		 Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.