| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 103778862 by singhiyv @ 2021-04-28 13:00 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | flohoff ♦2,466 | Hi,from looking at the aerial image there is no turning_circle at the end of the driveway.You might want to have a look again.Flo --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103778862 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | singhiyv | Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have misinterpreted the road end and added the loop. Thanks for the heads-up. Please find the changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103891887) for the suggested modification. Always happy to learn from the community. | |
| 102927228 by singhiyv @ 2021-04-14 11:36 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | DaveF ♦1,626 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930633757These two roads don't join. There a separating wall |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | singhiyv | Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I have missed checking the node connectivity. Yhanks for the heads up. Its good to see the community improvising our edit quality. PFB changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103045098) for modifications. Always happy to learn from the commun... | |
| 97485392 by singhiyv @ 2021-01-14 09:08 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | johsin18 ♦173 | Wouldn't it be beneficial to also add the garages that are accessed via this service road? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | singhiyv | Thanks for checking into the edits. I have added the missing road based on the driver feedback and available resources. I have not added the building as I am not sure of the geometry alignment. Please go ahead and make the additional changes or suggest me with the appropriate imagery to add the resp... | |
| 91451553 by singhiyv @ 2020-09-24 16:15 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Removed service road that you added - needs ground survey following recent building work - please don't add it via AI. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | singhiyv | Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the roads based on the available OSM imagery. It is good to see the community improvising our edits. Thanks for your suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community. | |
| 89900188 by singhiyv @ 2020-08-25 08:22 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | GoodClover ♦43 | May I ask why you added a (I think duplicate) serivce road and then delete the old one in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89900082If you made a mistake and added a duplicate please delete the new way and not the old way, this way the editing history is preserved.Thanks o/ |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | singhiyv | Hi GoodClover,Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies, I had accidentally created a duplicate road and deleted the older one. Thanks for the suggestions, going forward, I will preserve the first created road, deleting the duplicate ones created later.Always happy to learn from the commun... | |
| 88686136 by singhiyv @ 2020-07-29 15:12 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,659 | Hi, please take care when editing around existing data.The service road you have added should clearly join to the existing track, not to the bridleway. Also the section you have added should be tagged as access=private as there is no public right of way between the bridleway and the existing... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | singhiyv | Thanks for looking into our edits. Apologies for the incorrect node connectivity. I have not added private access so far since there are no resources to make such changes. Thanks for providing the valuable feedback. Please find the changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88738103) for sug... | |
| 87096317 by singhiyv @ 2020-06-24 16:41 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | hauke-stieler ♦340 | Hi,you made some changes here in Hamburg and always write "[...] based on latest imagery" which is never the case, there's much newer imagery than ESRI, Bing or in this case Maxar [0]. I wouldn't write that you're using latest imagery, because it's not true, a bit m... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | singhiyv | Hi,Thanks for checking into my edits. We cross verify all the imagery and utilize the most recent available imagery to make the edits. However we are grateful that the community verifies our edits with the local knowledge and provide valuable suggestions. Going forward, I will be following detail... |