| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69805246 by singhyyd @ 2019-05-02 13:45 | 1 | 2024-05-29 05:36 | canfe ♦1,132 | The access in not private |
| 2 | 2024-06-14 08:13 | singhyyd | Hi,I apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing the changeset and making the necessary corrections. I regret the incorrect addition of the access tag. Moving forward, we will ensure to double-check all available resources and make accurate edits. Thank you for your support. I�... | |
| 73574318 by singhyyd @ 2019-08-21 10:43 | 1 | 2019-08-27 05:02 | tordans ♦415 | Thanks, singhydd, that I road I wanted to add as well but never got around to actually do it :-).Viele Grüße |
| 2 | 2019-08-27 10:01 | singhyyd | Hi tordans,Thank you! I look forward to add meaningful data and enrich the existing. Let me know in case you have an suggestion.Regards,singhyyd | |
| 70232266 by singhyyd @ 2019-05-14 12:39 | 1 | 2019-05-16 11:40 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, are you sure that this is a publicly accessible residential road. Imagery (kerbs crossed and colour) suggests that this is a private shared driveway. The name Drover's Close is another indicator that should be taken into account.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2019-05-16 15:44 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi Phill,Thanks for looking into the edit. Our editor drew the road segment and added residential tag as per the OSM wiki of highway=residential and as per "driveway" OSM wiki this was mentioned in it "It is rare for a driveway to be the way to access another roadway." May b... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-19 14:58 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | There are several thing here that gives clues.A trend in modern housing estates is private shared driveways/parking areas. Generally this is what I am seeing based on experience of seeing these on the ground. The big indicators I can see on imagery is that the kerbs are crossed, indicating that ... | |
| 4 | 2019-05-19 15:06 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Although spending a bit of time looking through the history, changeset comments can be quite helpful.It is also important to consider why something is not mapped in a well mapped residential area.Cheers Phil | |
| 5 | 2019-05-21 12:51 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi Phil,Thanks for responding back. That really helps. We will change the part of the road to driveway as you mentioned and add private access.Please let us know if there is anything else that can improve the edit.Regards,yaswap. | |
| 6 | 2019-06-16 20:23 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | A bit of a followupThis was taken looking from Rowan Road.http://trigpoint.myzen.co.uk/photodump/RowanRoad.jpgIt is clearly a shared parking/access area for those properties. Its is clearly not a public highway.And for completeness from Drovers CloseHTH Phil | |
| 7 | 2019-07-09 14:03 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi PhilThanks for the updates. That's really helpful.Regard,yaswap | |
| 68874312 by singhyyd @ 2019-04-04 09:40 | 1 | 2019-07-08 09:55 | Constable ♦1,294 | Please make sure you also add a access tag with the proper value selected.This one looks like a private and gated service road, would be good to have it tagged as so then.Thanks |
| 2 | 2019-07-09 10:15 | singhyyd | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. This road was created/edited 3 months ago. But now we are following as per your suggestion in the previous comments with the same issues. I will add the private tag for this segment. Thanks for the updates.Regards,singhyyd | |
| 3 | 2019-07-09 10:25 | Constable ♦1,294 | Thanks! | |
| 70237105 by singhyyd @ 2019-05-14 14:16 | 1 | 2019-07-05 16:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,It looks like your access change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678672691/history has the same issue as was previously described at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71681165 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove... |
| 2 | 2019-07-05 17:34 | singhyyd | Hi Andy,Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71940418Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.Regards, singhyyd | |
| 3 | 2019-07-05 19:41 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Thanks. There are a few others to have a look at - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/KvA for those that you were the last editor of. | |
| 70383922 by singhyyd @ 2019-05-18 10:36 | 1 | 2019-05-18 13:36 | ndm ♦889 | Did you check this on Bing Streetside? |
| 2 | 2019-05-21 13:21 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi ndm, Thanks for looking into the edit. Is that about the gate in the street side or about the road that was created extending from Cornwallis Grove ?Please let us know.Regards,yaswap. | |
| 3 | 2019-05-21 20:17 | ndm ♦889 | The extended road from Cornwallis Grove. I've added a note that it needs to be surveyed. | |
| 4 | 2019-07-03 09:45 | singhyyd | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. We missed the note that was added here. We have reverted the edits made as per your suggestion.Regards,singhyyd. | |
| 70555816 by singhyyd @ 2019-05-23 15:13 | 1 | 2019-05-23 22:14 | ndm ♦889 | Demoted one to service |
| 2 | 2019-07-03 09:39 | singhyyd | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. We apologize for the delayed response. Yes, this road(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691986621#map=19/51.39920/-2.29626) should be service. It doesn't qualify for residential. Even the OS data supports that it should be service road. Thanks for making th... | |
| 71681165 by singhyyd @ 2019-06-27 17:33 | 1 | 2019-06-28 14:49 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,What was the source of your access change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-07-02 11:02 | singhyyd | Hi Andy,With reference to the motor vehicles parked in the satellite imagery and our delivery agent GPS traces added motor_vehicle access tags to these roads. But as per community request reverting my changes. Do let me know if you have any further questions.Changeset #71817017Regards,sing... | |
| 3 | 2019-07-02 12:06 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 70388919 by singhyyd @ 2019-05-18 14:39 | 1 | 2019-05-19 15:39 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi Again this is a shared driveway.Consider why it is not mapped in a well mapped area and valid sources such as OS Opendata show this without solid black lines,Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2019-05-21 13:05 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi Phil,Thanks for commenting. We were not using OS open data for the road classification so far. If possible please give suggestions1.If OS Open data has black lines does it mean that it should always be residential road?2. If there are no black lines can we go with service/driveway instead... | |
| 3 | 2019-05-25 12:03 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | If there are black lines it is likely to be a public highway. The big thing to remember is that these area were not mapped exclusively using imagery, they were largely mapped by local mappers who know the area. Look at the history of the surrounding ways when mapping and trust the judgement of the... | |
| 4 | 2019-05-28 10:32 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi Phil,Thanks for the information. That was really helpful. Please let us know if there is anything that can improve the edits.Regards,yaswap. | |
| 70383697 by singhyyd @ 2019-05-18 10:25 | 1 | 2019-05-18 13:32 | ndm ♦889 | Probably needs demoting to a service road for access to garages |
| 2 | 2019-05-23 14:36 | yaswap ♦68 | Hi ndm,Thanks for looking into the edit. Editor might have thought that it is also a residential road as most of the neighborhood is classified as residential. But yes it is leading to the garages which are in the back yard of the residential entities (might be an alley). There is another road t... | |
| 66628457 by singhyyd @ 2019-01-25 11:21 | 1 | 2019-02-14 15:43 | Syl ♦973 | Hello, I revert your change for the node 5961993653. Please be careful to not move things accidentally. |
| 2 | 2019-02-14 16:59 | yaswap ♦68 | Thanks for the update, Syl. Our editor accidentally moved the node of RUE DE RENNES. We have had a quick connect with the editor who has acknowledged the mistake and will ensure he does not repeat such mistakes.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happ... |