| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78622705 by sinreeya @ 2019-12-19 07:37 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | sinreeya | Hey,I have used Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery to make edits in this changeset 78622705.Regards,Sinreeya |
| 75875638 by sinreeya @ 2019-10-18 07:21 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | sinreeya | Hi,I have used Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery to make the edits in this changeset 75875638.Regards,Sinreeya |
| 75645043 by sinreeya @ 2019-10-14 07:12 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | sinreeya | Hi,I have used Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery to make the edits in this changeset 75645043.Regards,Sinreeya |
| 75507271 by sinreeya @ 2019-10-10 11:18 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | sinreeya | Hi,I have used Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery to make the edits in this changeset 75507271.Regards,Sinreeya |
| 75663189 by sinreeya @ 2019-10-14 12:12 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | sinreeya | Hi,I have used Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery to make the edits in this changeset 75663189.Regards,Sinreeya |
| 74176690 by sinreeya @ 2019-09-06 13:28 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please check the realtion https://www.osm.org/relation/8672936 and https://www.osm.org/relation/8672939. All restriction relation need a from, via, to role! |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | vssms ♦12 | Hi George,Thanks for your comment. Apologies for the edit made, we have corrected this under changeset #74385711Regards,vssms | |
| 74141150 by sinreeya @ 2019-09-05 15:30 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.Or to express it more clearly: No addr key has anything to do with a highway.In America, the postal code is noted on the street using tiger:zip_left and tiger:zip_right (historically by the Tiger I... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | sinreeya | Hi George,Sorry, I didn't understand the response. Could you please elaborate the comment?Regards,sinreeya | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello, thank you for the hint, I didn't finish the correction completely. So please ignore the second version for the highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435555630/history or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722267982/history.In the USA we use normally the five address tags addr:hous... | |
| 73160430 by sinreeya @ 2019-08-08 15:13 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | oba510 ♦274 | Are you sure about this? This block is clearly striped for two-way traffic (with a yellow line down the middle) in the most recent aerial imagery layers. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | sinreeya | Hi Oba510,Thanks for your comment. Apologies for missing to split and add the direction. I've corrected the segment directions now. regards,sinreeya | |
| 72310333 by sinreeya @ 2019-07-16 15:01 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | this is interesting in that along this loop, there have been placed five! nodes in the same location, ...519 down to ...514, with 515 the odd one out in that it is a nearby gate. i'm leaving this one alone for analysis, it's pretty unique. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Freebeer,As i can see, this edit was performed in the older version of OSM. I have removed the overlapping nodes. Please let us know if you have any suggestions.Regards,Ganesh | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | blast, clicked the entirely wrong button bringing up editor Potlatch1, but i can see your repair of the multiple nodes here was, in contrast to an earlier comment i made today, totally effective.as an aside, what you refer to as an older version of OSM is more correctly described as an earlier v... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | gseethar ♦67 | We try to use the latest version as soon as possible. However as pointed out by you, the issue seems to persist in .4 as well. We are trying to be little more careful during edits and audit the case post edit.Regards,Ganesh |