| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 106375596 by srinatpa @ 2021-06-15 06:32 | 1 | 2021-06-15 10:26 | PT-53 ♦3,642 | service=driveway ? |
| 2 | 2021-06-17 02:25 | srinatpa | Hello PT-53, Thanks for checking into my edits. I have added highway=service, as the segment leads to multiple entities. I have now changed the highway classification to driveway. Please find the changeset (106495482) with suggested modifications. Happy to learn from you. Have a good day! Rega... | |
| 85997154 by srinatpa @ 2020-05-31 02:31 | 1 | 2020-06-01 13:23 | limes11 ♦900 | This change is correct, thank you for that. May I ask which street view you are using that allows you to spot this? I could not find anything on mapillary or bing streetside, so I am wondering which other source there is.This is no criticism, just pure interest.Thank you! |
| 2 | 2020-06-03 03:24 | srinatpa | Hi Limes11,Thanks for validating our edits. We have made this edit partially based on the driver feedback and avaialble resources. Please go through the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68933 for detailed understanding of the private imagery we are utilizing. Happy to contr... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-03 09:47 | limes11 ♦900 | I understand. I was confused by the long list of "imagery_used" This is a bit misleading since you actually used none of these but only your private images. Not a big fan of this rather exclusive approach but it is for the sake of improving such map features, so I get the point. Thanks... | |
| 86103000 by srinatpa @ 2020-06-03 01:45 | 1 | 2020-06-03 01:53 | srinatpa | Comments correction : Added Maxweight for Uhlandstraße based on sign board in street view |
| 82769645 by srinatpa @ 2020-03-29 05:56 | 1 | 2020-03-29 12:13 | Richard ♦220 | Hi - why have you changed this into a highway=footway rather than a highway=cycleway? |
| 2 | 2020-03-29 12:47 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, this edit has gone rather wrong.There has been a bollard mapped here for several years, and this alone should prevent the passage of motor_vehicles. I have tested this with OSRM, Graphhopper and OSMand so I am concerned that you felt this edit necessary. What router are your drivers usin... | |
| 3 | 2020-03-30 10:31 | srinatpa | Hi all,Thanks for looking into our edits. We have added a footpath based on the separation in OS open data street view and the previous suggestions from the community. We left a note, so that the local mapper can improve our edits. Please find the suggestions from the changeset https://www.open... | |
| 4 | 2020-03-30 10:34 | Richard ♦220 | Thanks. This is what's called a "modal filter" - where a road has been stopped up to through motor traffic, but is still available for bikes and pedestrians.In cases like this in urban areas of the UK, you should always default to highway=cycleway rather than highway=footway.\... | |
| 5 | 2020-03-30 13:26 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi SrinatpaWhat was wrong with the original mapping of the bollard? A bollard blocks routing of motor_vehicles with all routers I know of, and if that is not occuring with the router your drivers are using then it suiggests that the router is broken and should be fixed.What router are your... | |
| 6 | 2020-03-31 05:47 | srinatpa | Hi Trigpoint,Thanks for the reply. We are checking for multiple resources to improve our edit quality. In our analysis, we came across some pattern of addition of path by the senior community members.( PFB Bollard data). we have improvised the methodology to addition of notes, so that only the e... | |
| 82328169 by srinatpa @ 2020-03-18 04:37 | 1 | 2020-03-18 20:58 | ndm ♦889 | Updated based on public Maxar Imagery |
| 2 | 2020-03-19 10:23 | srinatpa | Hi Ndm,Thanks for checking into our edits. The edit was based on Private maxar imagery dated "2019-11-16". The modified edit is creating road duplication, kindly verify the edit.Regards,Srinatpa. | |
| 3 | 2020-03-19 22:10 | ndm ♦889 | The edit is perfect with regards to Maxar imagery licenced for OpenStreetMap - if you have other imagery licenced for OpenStreetMap, please make it available. | |
| 4 | 2020-03-20 14:17 | srinatpa | Hi NDM,Thanks for your response. As mentioned in our wiki, we cannot share the private imagery publicly but it has the most recent imagery coverage (in few cases even a month old images). As per our ground survey (GPS traces of our driver) and latest satellite imagery proof, your edit is contrad... | |
| 5 | 2020-03-20 20:46 | ndm ♦889 | Remote mappers make a lot of mistakes, even Amazon ones -- I check all edits in my local neighbourhood -- anything that's not correct will get reverted / modified.If I can't use the same imagery then this will likely happen again.I have always been able to respond to other mappers ... | |
| 82251707 by srinatpa @ 2020-03-16 10:12 | 1 | 2020-03-19 22:57 | Mike Baggaley ♦630 | Hi, if changing access to only allow emergency vehicles, please note that setting access=no means pedestrians and cyclists cannot use the road. A more usual access would be motor_vehicle=no + emergency=yes, which allows pedestrians and cyclists to pass the barrier, but prevents motor vehicles other ... |
| 2 | 2020-03-20 14:19 | srinatpa | Hi Mike Baggaley,Thanks for checking into our edit. Our edits are partially based on the GPS traces of our delivery partner. We will take this as a learning from the community and make sure it will be improving our editing quality.Regards,Srinatpa. | |
| 81533107 by srinatpa @ 2020-02-27 06:21 | 1 | 2020-02-27 18:00 | ndm ♦889 | It improves motor_vehicle routing but degrades cycle routing -- I think you should have added a cycleway. |
| 2 | 2020-03-02 05:23 | srinatpa | Hi ndm,Thanks for taking the time to review my edit. We are still working on the addition of paths data in OSM with valid resources. Please find the changeset for suggested modifications(81663115). Please let me know in case any further edits required.Thanks & Regards,Srinatpa | |
| 81203685 by srinatpa @ 2020-02-19 06:12 | 1 | 2020-02-19 12:05 | TheEditor101 ♦21 | I used to walk past here quite a lot and from memory believe you're correct to disconnect this 👍 |
| 2 | 2020-02-20 06:35 | srinatpa | Hi TheEditor101,Thanks for checking my edits. This edit is partially based on the GPS traces of our delivery partner. Always happy to improve OSM quality.Regards,Srinatpa. | |
| 75141360 by srinatpa @ 2019-10-01 10:22 | 1 | 2019-10-01 10:33 | Chris Fleming ♦375 | Hi - I can't see any evidence in the imagery of road marking indicating one way, if anything I can see cars facing both directions which would indicate that there isn't a one way system here? |
| 2 | 2019-10-03 10:12 | srinatpa | Hi Chris Fleming,Thanks for looking into my edit.The directions to the lane are added on basis the lane markings that are visible aerially in earth watch. Didn't add it in source which is completely my mistake.So, added the source for the edit.Please revert the edit if it is not a one-way a... | |
| 3 | 2019-10-04 11:25 | Chris Fleming ♦375 | Thanks, unfortunately I don't know what Earth Watch is. It feels dangerous adding details like this based on on aerial imagery that can't be verified by anyone else. I've added a note for someone to check this on the ground. | |
| 4 | 2019-10-04 11:34 | Chris Fleming ♦375 | Just been googling around - found TRO that indicates theis has been one one way quite recently. So we're all good. Could you also check FORTH GARDENS and HILLVIEW in Oakley and see if the markings are visible on them. | |
| 5 | 2019-10-09 10:19 | srinatpa | Hi Chris Fleming, Thanks for the confirmation on changeset 75222860 where I added directions to Lindsay’s Wynd Road. About Forth Gardens and Hill View roads, we added the directions as per EarthWatch aerial imagery where lane markings are visible and added source . Please confirm the chan... | |
| 6 | 2019-10-09 13:05 | Chris Fleming ♦375 | Great thanks - I found the original council Traffic Redetermination Orders for these roads, and it sounds like these match up with the Imagery you have available. Thanks. | |
| 74628756 by srinatpa @ 2019-09-18 13:50 | 1 | 2019-09-18 17:32 | user_5359 ♦19,602 | Hello! Information from the Wiki: "NOTE! The exact key/value combination access=designated should never appear on an object. The value *=designated must be used with a specific mode of transport. Examples: bicycle=designated or foot=designated." The right value is access=destination (see... |
| 2 | 2019-09-26 14:35 | srinatpa | Hi user_5359,Thank you for looking into my edit. The access tag=designated for the (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37005050) was done 10 years ago. Due to a lack of proof, I did not change the access tag of the segment. Please let me know in case you want me to modify this edit. Looking forw... | |
| 73292569 by srinatpa @ 2019-08-13 06:54 | 1 | 2019-08-13 08:27 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, please could you keep your changes to a sensible areas.This changset has changes in both Essex and Cheshire and this creates a changebox covering a very large area and makes it difficult for local mappers to review your changes.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2019-08-13 11:02 | srinatpa | Hi,Thank you for bringing this to our notice. We usually edit only in a smaller area. This might have occurred due to some systemic/technical issue where two edits from different areas must have recorded into one changeset.Regards,Srinatpa | |
| 72121539 by srinatpa @ 2019-07-11 07:17 | 1 | 2019-07-11 07:52 | srinatpa | Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have cha... |
| 72121620 by srinatpa @ 2019-07-11 07:20 | 1 | 2019-07-11 07:52 | srinatpa | Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have cha... |
| 72121698 by srinatpa @ 2019-07-11 07:23 | 1 | 2019-07-11 07:51 | srinatpa | Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have cha... |
| 72121750 by srinatpa @ 2019-07-11 07:25 | 1 | 2019-07-11 07:51 | srinatpa | Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have cha... |
| 72121771 by srinatpa @ 2019-07-11 07:26 | 1 | 2019-07-11 07:47 | srinatpa | Due to some technical issues the above mentioned comment was incomplete. Below is the actual comment " The motor_vehicle tag was added based on our delivery partner GPS traces which is verified with the vehicles present in the satellite imagery. However, post the community feedback, we have cha... |
| 67686763 by srinatpa @ 2019-03-01 13:48 | 1 | 2019-03-05 14:58 | Alan Bragg ♦153 | Nice work. I added a couple buildings |
| 65471172 by srinatpa @ 2018-12-14 12:25 | 1 | 2018-12-19 10:32 | shaspand ♦1 | good edit |