| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 139910508 by stevewm @ 2023-08-15 11:38 | 1 | 2024-06-29 16:55 | BCNorwich ♦4,850 | Hi, Are the two bridges actually boardwalks? If so then the tag should be bridge=boardwalk.Regards Bernard. |
| 2 | 2024-06-29 16:56 | BCNorwich ♦4,850 | Sorry three bridges. | |
| 3 | 2024-06-29 19:22 | stevewm | Hi Bernard. Thanks for your comment. Yes they are.Two of them are already tagged with Highway=footway and bridge=boardwalk which I believe to be correct. The other wasn’t (it was bridge=yes) so I have changed it to match. I have also changed them to surface=wood rather than asphalt. | |
| 149039817 by stevewm @ 2024-03-23 07:21 | 1 | 2024-03-24 07:40 | BCNorwich ♦4,850 | Hi, The wood area Way: 1265432899 doesn't really extend over several highways, that would make driving very difficult. Nor would the outline be a self-intersecting line. So I've made slight amendments.Regards Bernard. |
| 140236779 by stevewm @ 2023-08-22 16:15 | 1 | 2023-08-24 17:27 | RobJN ♦77 | Hi SteveWM. Just to let you know that I have reverted these edits. I had previously mapped this garden in detail but the data was deleted. I raised this with the Data Working Group last week and they agreed that I could restore it. In the meantime you made these edits. I have now rolled it all the w... |
| 2 | 2023-08-24 18:40 | stevewm | Hi Rob,I have to say I was puzzled by this and a little put out that my additions were described as vandalism which certainly want my intention! I wasn’t aware of the previous detail and it appeared rather under mapped following a visit at the weekend so I was in the process of adding more d... | |
| 3 | 2023-08-27 17:11 | RobJN ♦77 | Just to be clear, your edits were not vandilism. The vandilism came from the user (corrector321) who deleted my previous mapping of this garden. That editor is working for the owner of this garden and hence I checked with the Data Working Group that I was ok to restore my edits. Obviously you had no... | |
| 4 | 2023-08-28 05:58 | stevewm | Thanks for the clarification. I have no problems with what you have done. I am not sure what the position is if an owner doesn’t want their area to be mapped, particularly if the information used is partly the result of a visit made under certain restricted conditions. For example it is common... |