| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 164394384 by toeklk @ 2025-04-01 21:15 | 1 | 2025-04-01 23:14 | bxl-forever ♦2,471 | Hello,Your latest edits to massively change footways into paths have an impact on access permissions.By default, a footway is solely reserved for pedestrians. And highway=path is open to pedestrians, cyclists and horse riders alike.I inspected the history of several objects which you ch... |
| 2 | 2025-04-02 07:01 | toeklk | Hi, in the wiki, it states "Footways tend to be constructed and either paved or with smooth surface (compacted, wood or similar). The elderly and small children and quite often also wheelchair users can use them with ease. They tend to be in urban settings, but not always. Access is primarily f... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-02 17:46 | toeklk | Also, I did check my other (2) changesets where I did similar edits ( #164394272 , #164394336 ) and afaict only this one had a problem with access rights not being present? | |
| 4 | 2025-04-02 17:49 | toeklk | (sorry for the spam :-)Specifically for Belgium - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways - statesfootway = Ways 'designed' for pedestrians where vehicles have no access. For me, the ways which are altered are not 'designed' for pedestria... | |
| 5 | 2025-04-02 19:59 | bxl-forever ♦2,471 | OK, I will not reopen the endless discussion about this wiki page (there are holy wars and some people edit the wiki to support some views).If you set the permissions right, this already fixes most of the problems. "motor_vehicle=no" is always the default value for paths, there is no n... | |
| 6 | 2025-04-03 08:26 | toeklk | For my interest: what are the remaining problems in your opinion? | |
| 7 | 2025-04-06 15:58 | bxl-forever ♦2,471 | Hello,I checked and it looks fine now, thanks for your latest changes. I just fixed some permissions to make sure they produce the same access conditions as before even if they are tagged as paths. | |
| 99325894 by toeklk @ 2021-02-15 17:48 | 1 | 2024-07-11 08:37 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32591989/ really an official BMX site? I couldn't find any info about this |
| 2 | 2024-07-15 14:21 | toeklk | No, it is not official, you're right. I removed the tags. | |
| 3 | 2024-07-15 19:19 | joost schouppe ♦1,146 | Thanks for the follow-up! | |
| 37962420 by toeklk @ 2016-03-20 19:31 | 1 | 2022-04-19 09:57 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Beste toeklk,Heet deze boom echt zo?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4070314262 |
| 2 | 2022-04-19 12:10 | toeklk | https://purews.inbo.be/ws/portalfiles/portal/5369946/Baet_etal_2007_BosreservaatPruikenmakers.pdf Figuur 5-41 | |
| 3 | 2022-04-19 14:51 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Dank je! | |
| 44547825 by toeklk @ 2016-12-20 18:28 | 1 | 2016-12-20 18:56 | Koen VO ♦17 | De wegen starten op het terrein anders dan oorspronkelijk aangegeven, wat verwarring met zich meebrengt wanneer je aan het lopen of het fietsen bent. Niet echt "big deal" uiteraard, want ze leiden naar hetzelfde punt. Als er iets niet ok is, geen probleem met de aanpassingen. |
| 2 | 2016-12-20 19:01 | toeklk | Ah, ik neem aan dat je met 'anders starten' bedoelt dat de oriëntatie initieel niet nauwkeurig genoeg is bv.? Alle verbeteringen zijn welkom! | |
| 3 | 2016-12-21 07:03 | Koen VO ♦17 | inderdaad! :-) | |
| 8738212 by toeklk @ 2011-07-16 10:09 | 1 | 2015-03-23 21:06 | Polyglot ♦86 | Hallo Toeklk, ik vind deze weg niet terug: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121897724. Is het een probleem als ik die verwijder? Jo |