| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71976727 by unnsyeda @ 2019-07-07 09:00 | 1 | 2022-06-26 23:00 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,Esri imagery is offset here. You can tell which is correct by looking at OS OpenData StreetView and OS OpenMap Local, and seeing that that is aligned well to Bing, but not Esri.Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2022-06-29 08:57 | mundlk ♦19 | Hi Andy,Thanks for reviewing our changeset. We have now modified the geometry based on OS OpenData StreetView and Bing Imagery as a part of Changeset: 122991410. Thanks again for the feedback. Happy to learn from you.PS: Replying on behalf of unnsyeda as the editor is on a leave.Best Reg... | |
| 71951196 by unnsyeda @ 2019-07-06 05:12 | 1 | 2021-08-08 09:17 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702022800 here based on Esri imagery, but you can see by looking at the other layers (including OS StreetView, which is old, but nt misaligned) you can see that the Bing imagery here is pretty good and Esri is significantly offset. Please ... |
| 2 | 2021-08-10 06:55 | unnsyeda | Hi Andy, Thanks for checking my edit. Apologies, I have missed going through Bing imagery and added the segment based on Esri imagery. Thanks for correcting my edit. Regards,unnsyeda | |
| 85067136 by unnsyeda @ 2020-05-12 07:14 | 1 | 2020-06-06 17:31 | tekim ♦696 | This is a driveway as it leads to a residence. The fact that it is unpaved is not relevant. OSM uses a functional classification system for the highway tag, not a physical classification. |
| 2 | 2020-06-08 15:56 | unnsyeda | Hi Tekim,Thanks for checking into our edits. This edit was done partially based on the driver feedback and available resources. Going forward, I will be adding the roads based on the respective entities along with the vicinity. Thanks for the quick correction. Always happy to learn form the com... | |
| 3 | 2020-06-08 20:12 | tekim ♦696 | unnsyede, Thanks for the reply. While on the ground feedback from driver's is valuable, most of your drivers will not be familiar with the OSM highway classification system. They may well have written "it is just a dirt track", and they would be correct in regards to written or spoke... | |
| 79950097 by unnsyeda @ 2020-01-23 04:51 | 1 | 2020-01-23 22:45 | DaveF ♦1,568 | HiI've reverted your changset as the bollards are often removed to allow vehicle access when other entrance is blocked due to filming, concerts etc. |
| 2 | 2020-01-27 14:59 | unnsyeda | Hi DaveF,Thank you for looking into my edit. This edit was based partially on the feedback of our driver partner. I will take this as a lesson and will make use of it in my future edits. Let me know in case you have any other suggestions. Always happy to learn from the local community.Best r... | |
| 3 | 2020-01-27 15:31 | DaveF ♦1,568 | Thanks you for replying. I believe the work Amazon logistics are performing adds good detail to the map in areas not accessible to the general public. We all make occasional errors. | |
| 79233648 by unnsyeda @ 2020-01-06 06:17 | 1 | 2020-01-07 00:09 | ACarlotti ♦158 | This changeset also moves a node in Germany by a small amount - presumably this wasn't intentional? How did this happen? |
| 2 | 2020-01-07 07:16 | unnsyeda | Hi Acarlotti,Thanks for reviewing my edit.It was an honest mistake. Will make sure this wouldn't repeat. Please let us know if any further changes are to be made. Always happy to learn from community.Regards, unnsyeda. | |
| 3 | 2020-01-08 00:02 | ACarlotti ♦158 | If the node was intended to be moved, then there's probably nothing else to do right now. If it was in the right place before, and is now in the wrong place, then you should create another edit moving it back to the correct place (and if you do that, then it would be helpful to mention this in ... | |
| 78751543 by unnsyeda @ 2019-12-23 04:12 | 1 | 2019-12-24 13:49 | ACarlotti ♦158 | You seem to have accidentally moved a node near Bradford as part of this changeset. Was that intended to be a separate changeset, or was the movement just a mistake? |
| 2 | 2019-12-31 10:11 | anilredd ♦9 | Hi ACarlotti,Replying on behalf of unnsyeda@. It was an honest mistake. Will convey same to the mapper and make sure this wouldn't repeat.Please let us know if any further changes are to be made. Always happy to learn from community.Regards,anilredd. | |
| 61074526 by unnsyeda @ 2018-07-26 04:43 | 1 | 2019-10-08 11:36 | Pink Duck ♦153 | This looks like tagging for the routing agent to me. There is no legal restriction on turning right into the Loddon Bypass NE exit slip road from A146 westbound. To me this looks you created the no right turn restriction to ensure trucks don't take the shorter but high angle turn (248 degrees).... |
| 2 | 2019-10-09 10:39 | unnsyeda | Hi Pink Duck,Thanks for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake. I understand the mistake now and will be more careful going forward. I have made changes in changeset 75453068. Please let me know for any other changes as per local knowledge. Always happy to learn from the community.\... | |
| 74674989 by unnsyeda @ 2019-09-19 13:52 | 1 | 2019-09-19 22:34 | rivermont ♦221 | Hi,Please don't use the live server for testing anything, even if you intend to revert it later. Especially copying existing data, and super-especially coastline data within relations.There is a dev server which I will try to find a link for, or you can do offline edits.Reverted in chan... |
| 2 | 2019-09-19 22:46 | rivermont ♦221 | The dev instance can be found here: https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org | |
| 74675678 by unnsyeda @ 2019-09-19 14:05 | 1 | 2019-09-19 22:34 | rivermont ♦221 | See my other comment.Reverted in changeset 74697408. |
| 71292367 by unnsyeda @ 2019-06-16 03:52 | 1 | 2019-07-05 16:52 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,It looks like your change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327151386/history has the same issue that was previously identified at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71690489 . Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?... |
| 2 | 2019-07-09 08:35 | unnsyeda | Hi Andy,As per your suggestion the motor_vehicle=yes that was added to the track roads have been reverted. I checked all these type of edits and reverted wherever necessary. Thanks for your insights. Changeset- 71996718Regards,Unnsyeda | |
| 3 | 2019-07-09 09:12 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,Thanks for that.Best Regards,Andy | |
| 64640284 by unnsyeda @ 2018-11-19 05:42 | 1 | 2018-11-19 14:37 | lakedistrict ♦308 | Thanks! Are these roads part of Stephenson Terrace or do they have a different name? |
| 2 | 2018-11-20 14:05 | lakedistrict ♦308 | OS OpenData StreetView has the name - it's Willow Green. Added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64699406 | |
| 3 | 2019-07-03 05:56 | unnsyeda | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. The road segments were added as per the latest imagery available in OSM. Thanks for adding the name.We apologize for delayed response.Regards,unnsyeda | |
| 64936196 by unnsyeda @ 2018-11-27 13:11 | 1 | 2018-11-27 19:29 | ndm ♦889 | This has been reverted. There are no "no right turn" signs visible in Bing streetside -- contrary to the misleading changeset comment.If you want to stop routing around the island you may need to fix your router to avoid sharp turns. |
| 2 | 2019-07-03 05:52 | unnsyeda | Hi,Thanks for reviewing the edit. The turn was restricted as it was a sharp turn. It should've been implicit turn restriction. Going forward we will add turn restrictions only if there is a proof. We apologize for the delay in response.Regards,unnsyeda. | |
| 71690489 by unnsyeda @ 2019-06-28 01:22 | 1 | 2019-06-28 14:13 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello,What was your source for the access change here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | 2019-06-30 01:53 | unnsyeda | Hi Andy,Thanks for writing to me. With reference to the motor vehicles parked in the satellite imagery and our delivery agent GPS traces I added motor_vehicle access tags to these roads. As per community feedback reverted my changes. Please let me know if you have any further suggestions.Changes... | |
| 3 | 2019-06-30 08:38 | SomeoneElse ♦13,404 | Hello unnsyeda,Thanks for that.Regards,Andy | |
| 66149402 by unnsyeda @ 2019-01-09 05:08 | 1 | 2019-01-09 13:03 | trigpoint ♦2,375 | Hi, your interpretation of these restrictions is a little wrong.An empty circle applies to all vehicles, not just motor vehicles, including bicycles, so you should add bikes to the syntax.Also the interpretation of sunset is incorrect, sunrise clearly is variable over several hours over the year... |
| 2 | 2019-01-11 15:03 | jguthula ♦65 | Hi Trigpoint,Thanks for looking into our edits and providing your feedback. This is the first time we came across this signboard and due to lack of information our auditor made a mistake. From your inputs we did a deep dive and tried to fix the issue appropriately. We also made changes to our tr... | |
| 64891870 by unnsyeda @ 2018-11-26 10:03 | 1 | 2019-01-08 23:25 | murble ♦26 | Please revert this, the Bing streetside imginary is very old, if you look at recent imaginary or walk down there you will see there is now a road way and a new development on what was once waste ground. |
| 2 | 2019-01-09 07:24 | sskalyan ♦67 | Thanks for the update, Murble. We have reverted the edit and changed it back to Residential road. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them. | |
| 65536987 by unnsyeda @ 2018-12-17 03:46 | 1 | 2018-12-17 09:40 | ndm ♦889 | This seems odd - Bing streetside doesn't show Bishop Monk Avenue -- how did you get to see the barriers. Also imagery seems to be 6 years old -- there seem to be new houses and roads here on OSM not on Bing. |
| 2 | 2018-12-18 07:22 | pattamaa ♦15 | Thanks for the update, we have rechecked and removed the lift gate since there is a new development as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us. | |
| 64892121 by unnsyeda @ 2018-11-26 10:15 | 1 | 2018-11-26 21:27 | ndm ♦889 | Bing streetside doesn't show any u-turn restrictions -- is there any reason this shouldn't be reverted? |
| 2 | 2018-11-27 11:36 | yaswap ♦68 | Thanks for the update,ndm . In some view angle of bing street side the legal median looked like a continuous one so the restriction was given. We have reverted the U-turn restriction as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.Please let us know if you have... | |
| 63777271 by unnsyeda @ 2018-10-23 02:00 | 1 | 2018-10-29 10:32 | redgnana ♦2 | Sample comment. Please ignore this. |
| 63145899 by unnsyeda @ 2018-10-03 05:20 | 1 | 2018-10-03 08:41 | tux67 ♦1,945 | What is the source of this changeset. PLease explain. Mapillary only shows your the highway close by and obviously it's not local knowledge. On top this has been reverted befoe with changeset https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58217008 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... |
| 2 | 2018-10-03 14:56 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi,As it can be seen, all nearby segments have access=no, except the tiny segment in question. This creates an island error for that segment and hence the edit was made.Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community a... | |
| 3 | 2018-10-04 13:55 | tux67 ♦1,945 | The whole area left from the A61 Highway is a British Military Area with restricted access, but the small street parallel to the A61 seems to be outside the fence and for this one the existing access=no is questionable (most likely all of those access=no are wrong as the soldiers/employees have acce... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-04 14:40 | gseethar ♦67 | Hi Tux67,Thanks for the quick update. Yes, As you have suggested, the segment under question extends along the boundary of the Military area. At the extreme side of the same segment - Node:274488642, 274488617, the segment seems to be inside the Fence.Please let us know your suggestions on if ... | |
| 5 | 2018-10-04 16:20 | tux67 ♦1,945 | My suggestion was in my last sentence above .. | |
| 60460070 by unnsyeda @ 2018-07-06 08:57 | 1 | 2018-07-06 08:59 | unnsyeda | Deleted the pedestrian street because it can't exist as cars can pass in that way. |