| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78564757 by utkap @ 2019-12-18 07:01 | 1 | 2022-11-14 17:16 | Matt McCutchen ♦62 | Hi! On what basis did you decide that this segment is better described as highway=service than highway=path? Routers will send motor vehicles along a way with highway=service, but I was just at the location and I'm convinced that this way is not intended for motor vehicle traffic. For one th... |
| 2 | 2022-11-15 14:50 | utkap | Hello,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edits. We have made the necessary corrections in the changeset 128946253. Thanks once again for the feedback provided, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,utkap | |
| 82909073 by utkap @ 2020-04-01 08:05 | 1 | 2021-03-08 15:08 | karson_ ♦146 | You mapped, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/786459222, jumping over a curb, going through hedges, and across a pedestrian area. |
| 2 | 2021-03-09 08:27 | utkap | Hi,Thank you for reviewing my edits. It is an honest mistake from my end, I have made the changes in this changeset #100690363.I will be extra cautious going forward, Happy to learn from you! Regards,utkap | |
| 83342638 by utkap @ 2020-04-10 06:43 | 1 | 2021-01-17 22:06 | jmapb ♦412 | Hi utkap, do you know why you marked this road oneway? I don't see any oneway markings in any of the imagery you've mentioned. |
| 2 | 2021-01-18 08:21 | utkap | Hi,Thanks for your inputs, I have added directions based on the median (island) in between, Since you have confirmed the ground truth, I have reverted directions in the changeset (#97680317). Looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,utkap. | |
| 81541414 by utkap @ 2020-02-27 09:30 | 1 | 2020-02-27 16:23 | aweech ♦369 | Hi,Please don't delete Class VI roads! I went ahead and fixed your mistake. |
| 2 | 2020-02-28 08:20 | utkap | Hi,Thanks for restoring the edit. Apologies for the deletion. While editing, I've noticed that the Bing street side imagery didn't provide any confirmation on the existence of the road at the node () and the aerial imagery also appeared to be covered with vegetation with no clue of the p... | |
| 75085594 by utkap @ 2019-09-30 08:27 | 1 | 2019-09-30 14:30 | MerlinPendragon ♦30 | Hello!This service road no longer exists. Everything in this area was recently torn down for new development. In general, if a road you're adding to the map goes through another building that someone else has already added (as it does here), it's probably a good idea to double-check. |
| 2 | 2019-10-01 08:06 | utkap | Hi,Thanks for the comment. Apologies for the edit, I haven't noticed that the edit was recently made, due to which I had assumed the building according to Mapbox imagery. I've now corrected the road under changeset #75134600.Regards,utkap |