| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 111148620 by viplavm @ 2021-09-13 14:20 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Ram Kapil ♦2 | great job !! |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | viplavm | Hello,Thank you for the appreciation. Looking forward to contribute more. Happy mapping.Regards,viplavm | |
| 81224277 by viplavm @ 2020-02-19 13:47 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Blasrohrkobold ♦2 | Sehr geehrter Damen und Herren,ich möchte Sie freundlich drauf hinweisen, dass Ihre Änderung nicht den Standards unserer Region entsprechen. Bitte geben Sie sich mehr Mühe oder machen Sie sich drauf gefasst, ein zweites Mal gesperrt zu werden.Mit herzlichen Grüßen... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | viplavm | Hi,Thanks for bringing this up. Apologies for the genuine mistake from my side and I will make sure that this will not be repeated going forward. I will strictly adhere to the editing guidelines in DE region. Thanks again. Best Regards,viplavm | |
| 110568591 by viplavm @ 2021-09-01 13:36 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo viplavm,warum ist dieser Weghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431553/history "Privat" und dieser Weghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431548/historynicht ?Führt dieser Weghttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431548/historywirklich durch dieses Silo:http... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | viplavm | Hello PT-53, I have added access=private to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978431553) as it is gated at one end. Please let me know if I am wrong. I will make necessary changes. Regards,viplavm | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo viplavm, so geht das nicht.Bitte schaue Dir das selbst nochmal an.Grüße | |
| 110569412 by viplavm @ 2021-09-01 13:54 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | PT-53 ♦3,642 | Hallo viplavm,ich habe Deine Bearbeitung zurückgesetzt.Dashttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640289874/historyreicht vollkommen aus !!!!!Grüße |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | viplavm | Hello PT-53,Thanks for correcting my edits. I will make sure to check these issues in my future edits. Regards,viplavm | |
| 109810460 by viplavm @ 2021-08-17 12:28 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | Why are the other roads without a driveway-tag? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | viplavm | Hey SafetyIng, Thanks for getting back to me on this. I have added the service road as it connects the other major road and also added another driveway as it is the minor road. From the definition, a driveway is a minor service road which leads to specific property. Please let me know your views o... | |
| 109419835 by viplavm @ 2021-08-09 16:51 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | danieldegroot2 ♦716 | Hey viplavm,In Nordrhein Westfalen, NRW Orthophoto is the standard imagery layer. If it doesn't work, look for a wm(t)s link to put in the "Custom" layer in iD (see also the German forum).Regards,Daniel |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | viplavm | Hi Daniel, Thanks for your valuable inputs. I will make sure to use NRW orthophoto imagery in my future edits in this region. Happy to learn new things from you. Regards,viplavm | |
| 108056481 by viplavm @ 2021-07-15 13:40 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | This road can not be a track (the main road too).Please see at wiki enty of hw=track: " Roads used for access to permanent human settlements or facilities should generally not use this tag. " |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | viplavm | Hi SafetyIng, I have digitized the track road as per the aerial imagery and the vicinity seems to be a forest with a network of track roads. Please let me know your inputs on this so that I can make any changes. Regards,viplavm | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | See at the Wiki for track....."Roads used for access to permanent human settlements or facilities should generally not use this tag."For more information and tagging suggestions, where track not fits: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack | |
| 107571779 by viplavm @ 2021-07-07 14:36 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SafetyIng ♦355 | Here Track is not suitable, from the wiki, when NOT to use track: "A minor road providing primary access to one or several permanent residences (driveway). See highway=service."https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track#How_to_decide |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | viplavm | Hello SafetyIng, Thanks for the feedback. I have modified the highway classification to service as visible from the aerial view. Also, I have added the driveway as suggested. Happy to learn from you!Regards,viplavm | |
| 105846382 by viplavm @ 2021-06-04 15:01 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | eserte ♦170 | Ist die Einbahnstraßenregelung neu? Im Dezember 2020 war hier noch keine Einbahnstraße, jedenfalls gab's Verkehrszeichen in beide Richtungen: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.49057464772136&lng=13.527677664545855&z=17&pKey=og9IZyPlKj46saBVZNTvgW&focus=photo&... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | viplavm | Hi Eserte,Thanks for looking into my edit and sharing your input. We got feedback from our delivery partner for Hönower Straße road being a oneway. On verifying the same with Kartaview imagery (https://kartaview.org/details/3457765/3044/track-info), a oneway sign has been identified t... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | eserte ♦170 | Funny, that's my own KartaView sequence.It seems that the oneway is temporary, due to construction, and on the end of the street (crossing Gundelfinger Str./Hönower Str.) there are some temporary traffic signs from the back --- possibly the corresponding "no entry" signs. If I&... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | viplavm | Hi Eserte,Thanks for the input. Please feel-free to make changes based on local knowledge or kindly, let me know so that I can make the necessary modifications. Thanks,viplavm | |
| 103645846 by viplavm @ 2021-04-26 15:06 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,672 | HiPlease consider the access and routing implications when mapping service road links between public highways.The ways you have added here are clearly through a farmyard and therefore need to be tagged as access=private.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,672 | Sorry, just realised you didn't create the routable link. It was added by one of your colleagues.Cheers Phil | |
| 90695780 by viplavm @ 2020-09-10 10:38 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | naveenpf ♦714 | Welcome to OSM India.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IndiaTo join OSM India Telegram click on.https://t.me/OSMIndia --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90695780 |
| 90368897 by viplavm @ 2020-09-03 14:52 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,672 | Hi, thank you for your addition but please take your time and do a bit more than the absolute minimum and improve the map by looking after the existing features.You have drawn your road over the top of an existing wood, it is clear from imagery that the wood is now smaller, please take care and ... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | viplavm | Hi, thanks for checking into our edits. I have not modified the other features as we do not have enough information to make the edits. Thanks for the quick suggestions. Please find the changeset(90401322) for the suggested modifications. Please let me know in case of any more modifications. Always h... | |
| 87700234 by viplavm @ 2020-07-08 09:26 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,672 | Hi, thank you for adding these roads however it is import to consider existing mapping when adding new features.In this case the area is crossed by a footpath, which based on it proximity to the road you have added should clearly be incorporated in the new residential road. As it stands now there ... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | viplavm | Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the roads based on the Bing aerial imagery. I completely agree with the incorporation of existing features in the new edits. However, in this scenario, I haven't modified the foot path and residential area, since most of the area is under constr... | |
| 86138657 by viplavm @ 2020-06-03 13:19 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | tux67 ♦2,044 | Hi,with this CS you obviously created a road on a school yard without any access restrictions. Even without local knowledge it should be clear that this is not a good choice. Just the fact that one of the Amazon Drivers took that way does not justify the access.BR tux67 --- ... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | viplavm | Thanks for checking into our edits. Please find the changeset(86196250) for the suggested modifications. I am adding the private access as per the suggestion. I will take this as a learning from the community and going forward, I will be more cautious while adding the roads leading to schools. thank... | |
| 83593371 by viplavm @ 2020-04-15 12:45 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Luckytown ♦18 | Sie sollten dringend den Belag der Straße angeben. Mit einem normalen Auto sollte man nur bedingt lang fahren. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | viplavm | Thanks for looking into our edits. This edit is partially based on our Driver feedback and available resources. I have not added any surface tags since there are no ground resources validating our data. It can be helpful if the local knowledge can improve our editing quality. Please go ahead and mak... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | Luckytown ♦18 | Hallo, eigentlich wäre surface=asphalt meiner Meinung nach richtig. Allerdings ist das Problem, das der Asphalt kaputt und mit großen Löcher zersetzt ist. Dafür finde ich leider keinen "Key". | |
| 79142564 by viplavm @ 2020-01-03 05:59 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | ndm ♦889 | There's no service road here https://binged.it/37zxuwu -- I'll revert.If you meant to add a driveway -- then it was either too long or misaligned, depending on which house it was supposed to be associated with. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | viplavm | Hi ndm,Thanks for reviewing my edit and making the necessary changes. It was an honest mistake. From private aerial imagery the road is visible and it was leading to single entity. I should have added a driveway rather than a service road. Will take this as learning and use for the further edits... | |
| 77821097 by viplavm @ 2019-12-02 12:49 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,672 | Hi, please can you keep you changesets to sensible areas. This changeset has changes near both Newark and Ealing, this make it very difficult for local mappers to review your changes. In future please save and close changes before moving to other areas.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | viplavm | Hi trigpoint,Thanks for looking into my edit. Will take your suggestion as learning and use for the future edits.Please let me know if anything needs to be changed.Always happy to learn from community.Regards,Viplav S Manas. |