| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 178525020 by vojtechzaboril @ 2026-02-13 23:19 ~ 5 days ago | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | osmviborg ♦1,762 | Please touch the address nodes. Addresses in Denmark are imported from an official database and maintained automatically. Thank You. |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | osmviborg ♦1,762 | Please 'don't' touch 🤭 | |
| 3 | ~ 5 days ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, thanks for the info. What will happen, will it make another node in next import? If yes, I think that the import tool should check if the address node exists.Or please explain the reason in more details. ThanksV | |
| 4 | ~ 5 days ago | osmviborg ♦1,762 | Moved back to where it belongs.Further reading: https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?search=autoaws&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go#How_to_map | |
| 175796563 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-12-11 10:51 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | Ondřej Lopatka ♦27 | je opravdu way/1457744200 jinde než na satelitních snímcích? Tzn. je značen severně od satelitních snímků |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | vojtechzaboril | Probíhala tam rekonstrukce asi 3 křižovatek (a již skončila, podle toho co jsem našel). Pozici přechodu jsem zkontroloval v projektové dokumentaci a odpovídá to tomuto místu.V | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | Ondřej Lopatka ♦27 | Díky | |
| 173922195 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-10-29 10:35 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | mike140 ♦368 | It looks like your changes have caused part of the road to disappear here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/33.33643/75.19333 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | vojtechzaboril | Thanks. I fixed it now. | |
| 161983358 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-01-31 16:21 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,515 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12546684103 - have you wanted to add ele=687 ? |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, yes definitely. I fixed it now. Thanks for notice. | |
| 161323492 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-01-13 20:06 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Richard ♦224 | Hi - could you say why you removed the note tags from way 319586047 in this changeset? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,it was probably my mistake. I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174146243 | |
| 172102894 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-09-18 09:37 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Arminus ♦43 | May I ask why you tagged the entire relation 2227233 as via_ferrata while in fact only parts of it (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76618437) is a via ferrata? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hello, sorry, I think that the name of the relation (which is Via ferrata "Fausto Susatti") is little bit confusing. Thats probably why I made this mistake. So sorry again.I reverted the change here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172424752 | |
| 171956428 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-09-15 10:00 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | NunoCaldeira ♦565 | hello, can you prove that the construction has started? |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hello, I just edited the geometry of the tunnel itself. And I have also seen photos of the tunnel under construction. Or do you mean the roundabouts? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | NunoCaldeira ♦565 | i meant the roundabouts. those are not in construction yet. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | vojtechzaboril | I changed them to highway=proposed. Thanks for clarification.BR | |
| 169401529 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-07-24 14:08 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | mueschel ♦6,918 | Hi,please check this lake, something went wrong with the name tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99246340 |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, thanks. I fixed it now. | |
| 167994247 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-06-23 09:48 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | Fjavion ♦2 | Není II/643 v Štěpánovicích překlep místo II/634? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Ano je, má to být samozřejmě 634. Prosím o opravu. Díky | |
| 167856385 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-06-20 07:29 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | micheleOSM3 ♦145 | I would like to inform you that for FVG (Friuli Venezia Giulia) the 2020 IRDAT Orthophotos and the 2020 IRDAT lidar are available and they are very detailed and precise.Mappators who map in FVG generally align objects using the 2020 IRDAT Orthophotos and the 2020 IRDAT lidar which are much more ... |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,thanks a lot. I have the Ortophoto already in my JOSM, but as I'm also editing areas outside FGV, I didn't remeber to use this perfect Ortophoto.I also added Lidar layer to JOSM, so now it will be perfect.Thanks again.(I corrected the not aligned tracks).V | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | micheleOSM3 ♦145 | Thank you very much, I really appreciate your work and the mapy.com maps! | |
| 113401890 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-05 10:21 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Zdravim. Aky bol dovod posunu Node: Bratislava-Dolnozemská c.?Plna ciara zacina neskor.V. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, jedná se o mojí chybu. Opravím. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, preco by mala mat cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456146643 nazov Ruzinovska?A kedze uvadzate ako jediny zdroj Wikipediu, ziadne posuny ani nove objekty (na wiki nie su) ani premenovania ciest ste nemali robit (Wikipedia nie je povoleny zdroj udajov). | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den,chvíli jsem to teď nechápal, ale už jsem na to přišel. V OSM je totiž zakreslena i plánovaná komunikace "Ružinovské" a tohle byla její již postavená část. Ale chápu, že správně se tak z... | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Navrhovaná komunikace je zde https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453439001A samozřejmě to je "Ružinovská" (překlep) | |
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Ano tu planovanu cestu chapem. Ale ten existujuci usek (len taky naznak vybezku cestu) nie je ani v katastri a nema ziadny nazov, tak zatial bud bez nazvu, alebo ;Pri letisku' by asi bolo viac namieste. | |
| 162824337 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-02-22 16:58 ~ 11 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,515 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311433216/history has surface = aluminium that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)Maybe surface=metal material=aluminium would be better tagging here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dmetal |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,515 | wait, are you sure these are steps rather than a ladder? | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,I see that the previous version were more corect (aluminium ladder). Could you please change it to that?Thanks | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | vojtechzaboril | I changed it because i thought that highway=ladder is not a valid tag. | |
| 5 | ~ 10 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,515 | reverted with https://revert.monicz.dev/ thanks for a quick reply | |
| 6 | ~ 10 months ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,515 | (though maybe tagging can be better here but I am not exactly familiar with the best way to tag ladders) | |
| 164049557 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-03-24 19:53 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Edit comment of changeset to: "Disused shop #mapycz" |
| 163615745 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-03-14 15:50 ~ 11 months ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | dp7 ♦71 | Hello, the elevation was correct before: this is not the main mountain, "Palazzo Borghese", but it's a secondary peak: the ele here is 2119 mt |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, thanks for explanation. It was caused by the wrong wikidata (Wd of the main peak), which confused me. I will fix it.Regards | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | vojtechzaboril | I see you already fixed it (also removed the wd). Thank you a lot.V | |
| 163239470 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-03-05 10:52 ~ 11 months ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Come segnalato sul changeset 163239411.Spiegami se hai basato le modifiche solo guardando le mappe Strava.Ivo |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,the idea was same. If there is a marked route in OSM (at path A) and Strava says that the nearby path (path B) is used a lot more (actually path A is not used according to strava). This leads to a conclusion, that path B is marked and not path A.Also it was reported by user, which walked this... | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Grazie delle risposte, che mi lasciano ancora con molti dubbi.Se un sentiero per raggiungere una località è poco usato significa che l'ente competente regionale (IPLA) deve valutare se fare manutenzione su un sentiero o cambiare il percorso.Per cui ti chiedo ancora di ripristi... | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,I know that not all people use Strava. But when looking to those who use, why they don't choose that path?I also have the report from user, which were on that place and told us, that there is no path.If you can send it to someone, who will review it and fix it (renew the marking or rer... | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Grazie!Ivo | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Can you send it to someone to review the situation of marking? If not, just tell me. ThxV | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Si, avviso la sezione CAI competente.Come referente OSM per la SOSEC Piemonte è uno dei miei compiti.Ivo | |
| 8 | ~ 11 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Thanks,my question is what to do next time (when I find somethink is not correctly marked)? Is there a list of people as you, who can “fix” it? List together with areas of responsibility would be the best.V | |
| 9 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Al momento sono, più o meno, l'unico che controlla tutte le route hiking in Italia, con un occhio particolare ai percorsi nel catasto nazionale.Quando trovo dei problemi li risolvo, mentre se necessario andare sul territorio posso contattare referenti regionali o sezionali.IvoCi ... | |
| 163239411 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-03-05 10:51 ~ 11 months ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Ciao.Come fai a decidere se un sentiero è abandobed guardando le mappe di Strava?I sentieri che hai modificato, andando a rompere due relazioni di percorsi a catasto nazionale, esistono.Per favore ripristina la situazione precedente o dimmi che hai percorso quei sentieri personalmente e... |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, we got it reported by our (mapy.cz) users. I checked it on Strava.com Heatmap with this idea: If there is a marked path, at least someone (with Strava) will use it. As there were no Strava.com records, I decided that the path (and definitely not the markings) are there, and thats why I marked it... | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Quindi vorresti dichiarare ogni way non percorsa da (uno? molti?) utenti di Strava come inesistente?Non mi sembra una maniera corretta per mappare!Ad esempio io, e nessuno che conosco, non mando a Strava i sentieri che percorro abitualmente.Se non conosci la zona personalmente, per favore ripr... | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,its not as you say, you simplified it too much. I just want to mark as abandoned the path, where our user told that it doesn exist and I verified it on strava. Give yourself a question: why all strava users choose the other path than this one (the one i marked as abandoned)? The obvious solutio... | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Dimenticavo...Se vuoi essere utile alla comunità, e non solo alla cartografia da remoto, ti chiedo di specificarmi quali sarebbero i percorsi A e B che dici.Se devo mandare qualcuno a revisionare i percorsi è un'informazione utile.Ivo | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Non ci siamo ancora capiti.Hai spezzato due relazione hiking lasciando dei buchi che devono essere colmati.Se hai il dubbio, spero ti sia venuto in mente, che i sentieri che hai dichiarato abandoned ( tag molto discutibile su un sentiero su un terreno naturale), perché non usi il tag trai... | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,I changed it to highway=path and trail_visibility=no.Details: User reports that this path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102150845) is not existing, there is also no marking.If you got someone to forward this issue, please do it. Thanks.V | |
| 161815509 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-01-27 12:01 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Perché hai modificato le relazione a catasto nazionale ECNAR440 e ECNAR510 ?Si tratta di dati ufficiali, se sul terreno ci sono incongruenze sei pregato di segnalarli alla sezione CAI competente o al sindaco del comune.Ti prego di ripristinare i dati precedenti.Ivo |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,I made those changes, because I have seen those guidepost with R44 on them (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12536091967, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12536142713) and this one without marking of hiking route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12536142712).According to those guidepos... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Grazie.Devo comunque ripristinare le relazioni precedenti, perché sono dati ufficiali.Provvedo io a segnalare le incongruenze della segnaletica.Si tratta di segnaletica messa da volontari che a volte non seguono le indicazioni, in questo caso si tratta probabilmente di errori da rimedia... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | I understand you, but we are mapping reality (not the ideal state of things). And it's as I said (and as the photos says). The better option is to leave it as it is and after the remarking (fixing signs in terrain) change it to reflect the real state.But do what you think is the best.V | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | Jrachi ♦816 | Indagando più a fondo ho interpellato il referente di zona e andremo a breve a rifare il rilevamento ufficiale.Purtroppo abbiamo dei percorsi che sono stati rilevati molti anni fa, anche se costituiscono dati amministrativamente ufficiali, in modo poco aderente alla realtà.Grazie a... | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Ok, I understand.Thanks. | |
| 161826252 by vojtechzaboril @ 2025-01-27 16:46 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | sokol15 ♦32 | Ahoj, díky moc za opravy. Sleduju jak se ty čísla a kategorie v OSM pořád mění, aniž by v reálu došlo k jakékoli změně. Samozřejmě to je stále silnice 1. třídy I/3. |
| 158311105 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-10-24 19:38 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Source is strava.com heatmap and survey. Sry |
| 154723998 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-08-02 08:20 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | StC ♦404 | Hi,there seems to be a topic for discussion with this changeset. Here in France the outdoors community is trying to find a consensus on how to map parent and child relations in large routes, and some are adamant that there should be no name in child relations. I suppose that it makes it easier ... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, the trick you described (use tags from parant instead of children) looks good, if it is necessary, we will adopt it if absolutely necessary. But I think that adding the name to childs is generally not a problem. If there is a consensus on that in France, I will respect it.Unfortunately, we d... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | StC ♦404 | Hi,unfortunately there is no best practice that I'm aware of; it's difficult to stabilize one among mappers when their favorite apps have such different behaviours.What intrigues me in your reply is that you treat "use tags from parent instead of children" as a new idea, ... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | I meant to use the parent relation for rendering instead of using the child relations.So missing names in child relations will be no problem.Sorry if it wasnt clear in previous message.V | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | StC ♦404 | It's the topic that's difficult to communicate about, not you who are unclear (not more than me at least!). My perception is that currently your outdoors rendering ignores the names of child relations when they exist. I cannot paste images here, but I everywhere I look the child's nam... | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, I will try to explain that correctly.Currently our (mapy.cz) renderer ignores the 'superroute' (or the parent relations, as mentioned in previous messages), so only the child routes are rendered, so only the ref (16 in this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1128459/history) cas... | |
| 157612725 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-10-08 08:03 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Edit: "ref of route is not ..." |
| 157551326 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-10-06 17:36 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | AntMadeira ♦262 | Hi, vojtechzaboril.Can you please tell me how do you know this is a residential area?Regards,António. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | According to aerial images, there are houses. Or do you think that their purpose is somethink else?BRVojtech | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | AntMadeira ♦262 | Thanks for your reply.The problem is that with those houses (most of them residential, no doubt), you're including many other areas, like gardens, agricultural areas, religious areas, sporting areas and commercial areas.Also, mapping residential areas like this violates one of the main ba... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,Ok, now I understand the issue. Should I revert my changeset?V | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | AntMadeira ♦262 | I'm of the opinion that it's the best thing to do here. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Reverted (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157573945). | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | AntMadeira ♦262 | Thank you very much.Best regards,António. | |
| 157339876 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-10-01 13:28 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | isidor ♦32 | Tohle není pravda. Položit pár metrů betonového panelu, který před mnoha lety někde ÚPLNĚ JINDE v Praze sloužil jako podklad pro kolejnice, zrovna tady, z tohoto místa nedělá "bývalou tramvajovou trať". Ostatně ty panely jsou... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Situaci jsem nakonec vyřešil jinak, viz poslední komentář u vaší sady změn | |
| 157040254 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-09-24 13:35 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | debos00s ♦3 | 👌🏻 |
| 156401319 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-09-09 15:49 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Edit: source is Bing; survey |
| 156385516 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-09-09 09:36 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | kuhni74 ♦420 | If the elevation is given on the guidepost, it is too low. My source for the accurate elevation was the Laserscan (as I tagged on the mountain pass), and you can see by the contour lines that 2698m is too low for the place. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, yes it was on the guidepost. If its definitely wrong, please put back your version. Also please add information to the guidepost, that the written ele is wrong. Thanks | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | kuhni74 ♦420 | Okay, that's what I'll do! | |
| 155549460 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-08-21 10:21 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | isidor ♦32 | Ahoj, jaký je zdroj pro ten asi 10 metrový kus koleje ve směru od Můstku (resp. spodní části VN) do Vodičkovy? Nevím o tom, že by se tam něco stavělo nebo mělo stavět v dohledné době. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Tenhle kousek byl vidět v dokumentaci stavby. Na místě jsem to neověřoval | |
| 155517479 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-08-20 16:03 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | The fact, that in rsd.cz map data, this roundabout is marked as part of motorroad means nothing. Its not a dual-cariage way nor motorroad -> so no trunk |
| 155412387 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-08-18 12:32 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Piskvor ♦452 | Ahoj, díky za aktualizaci :) Je to ale zvláštní - oblouk z Vodičkovy nahoru na Václavák se zatím nestaví? (Neptal bych se takhle, ale fakt ho na fotkách z místa nikde nevidím...) |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Ahoj, koukal jsem na web dpp na to co se má stavět. Na místě jsem nebyl. Prosím tedy o přeznačení těchto částí na 'proposed' když se ještě nestaví. Díky | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Piskvor ♦452 | Nn, s tagováním problém nemám, i podle fotek se to evidentně staví. Jen mi nebylo jasný, zda tam ten oblouk z Vodičkovy opravdu zatím chybí (pokud jo, jako "proposed" ho nově mapovat nebudu). Skouknu to v týdnu na mís... | |
| 155387642 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-08-17 19:51 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | aTarom ♦887 | Hi, thanks for editing, one question please, are the names:name="Fuente PFM - Punta Prima"https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12117418747/historyname="Fuente PFM - Sant Tomàs"https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12117383697/historyfrom a reference plaque at the drin... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, the names are from the operator of those water sources. If you find better names which are physically on it, please update it. | |
| 155355559 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-08-17 06:58 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | dypa ♦159 | reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155356612because "Тосненский водопад" at node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1913844604in "Саблино" 2 waterfalls with different names |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, sorry for the mistake. I've got wrong information. | |
| 155199061 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-08-13 14:34 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | DaveF ♦1,608 | HiWhy does this require an area tag? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, its because weir can't be used on area (according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dweir). So I'm thinking now about changing it into way. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, I decided to split it into two ways. Here is the changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155231763) | |
| 154266415 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-07-22 14:33 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | BáthoryPéter ♦86 | Hi! Why did you mark this ferry route as disused? It operates normally. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, sorry for that, but we I have information that it is not working and I didn’t found any source that says that it is operating. If you have an online source about this ferry, please add it to the ferry to prevent this misunderstanding. Sorry again | |
| 154616104 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-07-30 17:19 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Taksine ♦147 | Hello, English isn't spoken in China, please don't write English on name. Are you an employee of Mapy.cz? What you're doing is too unprofessional. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hello, i just copied the name from area of that junction to those nodes. If you know its name in chinese add it to name and move this name to name:en | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | I simply cant add name in chinese without knowing it.Regards | |
| 105624399 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-05-31 12:34 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Zdravim. Vidno, ze nemate paru ako bude upravena Senecka cesta, hlavne ze robite nieco co nema ani trochu docinenia s finalnym stavom. Vratte vsetky vase zmeny co sa tyka D4 a okolia. Doslova skodite. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zaujimave, pritom tvrdi, ze tam vsade bol (survey), ziadny iny zdroj neuvadza. | |
| 129814108 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-12-07 09:47 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zase zbytocne a nespravne posuny geometrie ciest, pripajanie odbocovacich pruhov na nespravne miesta.Taktiez "upresnovat" cesty podla rozmazaneho Maxaru asi nie je najstastnejsie, musim to teraz zase davat naspat, podla novej Ortotofotomozaiky ste to neposunuli na spravne miesta. Z Maxar... |
| 154821025 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-08-04 16:46 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Road has been opened (checked Aug 3) |
| 154742872 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-08-02 15:56 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | NieWnen ♦1,214 | Why did you merge Krosna Józefowska bus stop with a platform (way)? Please don't do it. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Sry for it, but what is the problem with it? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | NieWnen ♦1,214 | highway=bus_stop is a place where passengers waiting. In Poland is very common to place it at shelter's location.Merging with highway=platform which is only addition here may be unwanted, it can also produce false-positives for validators which checks if highway=bus_stop is no on the highwa... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Thanks for those information. And sry again | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | NieWnen ♦1,214 | No problem, thanks for fast response :) | |
| 154612190 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-07-30 15:45 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | It is still tertiary road (according to ref), surface tags added |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Marek-M ♦1,002 | Hi, before changing the road category, did you familiarize yourself with the rules for mapping roads in Poland? The wiki is in Polish, so you may have difficulty understanding the full content of the descriptions. One of them says that: the official road classification may be auxiliary, but not deci... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Marek-M ♦1,002 | Reverting changeset because:Official road classification may be auxiliary, but not decisive when determining the value of the 'highway=*' tag The roads you changed had correct categories before.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154639805 | |
| 154612146 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-07-30 15:44 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Marek-M ♦1,002 | Hi, before changing the road category, did you familiarize yourself with the rules for mapping roads in Poland? The wiki is in Polish, so you may have difficulty understanding the full content of the descriptions. One of them says that: the official road classification may be auxiliary, but not deci... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, in that case make a revert of those changes. Thanks | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Marek-M ♦1,002 | Reverting changeset because:Official road classification may be auxiliary, but not decisive when determining the value of the 'highway=*' tag The roads you changed had correct categories before.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154639805 | |
| 154612086 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-07-30 15:43 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Marek-M ♦1,002 | Reverting changeset because:Official road classification may be auxiliary, but not decisive when determining the value of the 'highway=*' tag The roads you changed had correct categories before.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154639805 |
| 154615195 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-07-30 16:59 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Edit:Changed to landuse=residential as boundary of administrative area are already mapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/270090 |
| 154340481 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-07-24 09:28 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | NieWnen ♦1,214 | To wygląda na niepoprawną zmianę.Jeśli nie było tu zmian w oznakowaniu, to dalej jest niepoprawne/niekompletne, dlatego oznaczenie relacjami było tu lepszą opcją, ponieważ od Ryżowej można skręcić w Centralną i przejazd jest wtedy w pełni legalny, co zresztą jest bardzo częstą ... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, I changed it back to previous state now (no access tags).I changed it to access=destination, because I found a sign near (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/413543319) which says only residents can use this road.Sorry for that. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | NieWnen ♦1,214 | The sign is true, but only from this end of the street – that's why traffic organisation is broken here. I already tried to change it by contacting the local government office, but without success :/A lot of people use it anyway, even clerks :)Thanks for fast response.Not... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,I have got problem with this relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14371574), because it disallows cyclists to use Salomejska->Centralna. Is it true that this sign is also valid for cyclist? If not, please make an exception in this relation.Thanks. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | NieWnen ♦1,214 | Yes, that's true.From Badylarska to Ryżowa cyclists cannot go by the law. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | NieWnen ♦1,214 | Salomejska->Ryżowa too. | |
| 153161821 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-06-25 15:04 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Tomas_J ♦329 | Dik za opravy. Napada te jeste co s timhle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1292532362)? Podle ortofoto jsou to individualni stromy na louce oznaceny jako natural=wood. Tag natural=tree se tam asi nehodi - nejsem si jisty zda jsou stromy dostatecne vyznamne (obcas jsou to i jen kere). Mozna smazat... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Asi změnit na natural=tree, pokud se jedná o samostatný strom (nevím jestli je třeba řešit výraznost/velikost stromu). Pokud je stromů více, tak asi landuse=forest. Keře asi smazat nebo natural=scrub. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Tomas_J ♦329 | :) tak to je slusny mikromaping. Zkusim ve volnych chvilich tak zmenit. :) | |
| 152213365 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-06-03 18:52 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | km2bp ♦289 | There is probably a ruin of a mill there https://pl.mapy.cz/zakladni?source=coor&id=15.178127777777776%2C52.47210277777778&sourcep=foto&idp=7788562&x=15.1780983&y=52.4720456&z=19&ovl=2 I hope that my photos that I add directly to Openstreet maps will one day also be ... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, I forwarded your message to someone in mapy.cz, who will decide if it's possible to import and use your photos (and other's as well) from OSM. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, we are not able to import those photos (they don't have compatible licence). Currently we are importing photos from wikimedia commons (compatible licence), if they are linked from wikidata (and the wikidata is linked from osm with wikidata=*).Hope you understand.Regards. | |
| 152030995 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-05-30 11:47 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Sorry for not splitting |
| 152002228 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-05-29 18:30 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Sry again for not spliting the changset. First change is at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/40.25448/23.50247The second: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/47.43687/11.87694Sry again |
| 147184003 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-02-07 16:40 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | JunosL ♦8 | Hi, are you sure this is a footway? I haven't seen this in person, but on Google Street View it seems it got rebuilt at some point to now allow for (presumably service) vehicle access. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, I fixed it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151638505Thanks for the correction. | |
| 144599159 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-11-29 18:17 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Road–Runner ♦221 | but pedestrians are still allowed ;) |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Sorry if I changed the foot tags. It was not on purpose. | |
| 148903815 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-03-20 10:25 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | majestixx-de ♦6 | Dear @vojtechzaborilI reverted your access:no in Change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151131344Although part of the trail is destroyed at KM 7 (from ribeiro frio) the Levada is still part of round trips, in-and-out-trails and even to Portela a detour |
| 150717075 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-04-30 16:36 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Sry for huge outbox, I forgot to split it :( |
| 149404642 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-03-31 19:06 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Sry for huge outboxI forgot to divide it to locations 31.7738,117.3594and47.3699,13.1056 |
| 143432993 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-10-31 16:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Malý hajzl ♦12 | Jako popisek máš napsat "D1 - zničil cizí robotu." a hned by bylo jasné, cos tam zrobil. Podle odhadu tam byly udělány přesně nájezdy s přesným navedením a zakreslením. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Malý hajzl ♦12 | *Podle odhadu jsem tam měl udělány ...+ Vaše "Tu jste měli odbočit" je při jízdě o nervy. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Takhle je to ale správně. Přečtěte si o tom prosím něco např na osm Wiki (např sekce Examples, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn). V mapě jsem samozřejmě označil kde se nachází odbočovací pruhy, je ale na navigačním sw toto brá... | |
| 149024069 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-03-22 17:29 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Road–Runner ♦221 | Hello. The piste difficulty here was edited multiple times from intermediate to easy and vice versa. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368372556/history.So is it really easy? Which source did you use for your edit? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, I used the current map of the ski areal.V | |
| 112225992 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-10-07 16:53 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | FraukeLeo ♦289 | Hallo, motorway_junction gibt es nur auf Autobahnen und autobahnähnlichen Schnellstraßen. Bitte nicht jede Ausfahrt einer einfachen Bundesstraße so taggen. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, ok, thanks for correction. | |
| 147208904 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-02-08 09:31 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Sorry, for the big changeset. It has to be divided in two. |
| 146871507 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-01-30 16:51 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | mcliquid ♦2,023 | Hi,please note: changesets should be local.To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)• keep changes within the same country• upload/save changes before... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, sorry for it. It's my mistake. I'm always trying to make local changesets. | |
| 146557351 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-01-22 15:00 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Should be "Demolished building #mapycz" |
| 146325447 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-01-16 14:10 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | arjunaraoc ♦641 | Your changeset bbox spans several countries and continents. Please split your edits restricting it to smaller areas no larger than a country in the worst case for facilitating review. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | I agree with you. It must be my mistake. | |
| 146066807 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-01-09 13:19 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Correct source is Bing; survey |
| 141260531 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-09-14 14:19 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Sandal man ♦406 | ¿Tal vez estos caminos tengan una función?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1207779381Saludos |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | It could be my mistake. I will have a look. Regards. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | I forgot to make a multipolygon from 4 ways. It is corrected now. | |
| 145917091 by vojtechzaboril @ 2024-01-05 11:08 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,032 | foot and bycicle combined way is highway=path+footway=designated+bicycle=designated+segregated=yes|no |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | My tagging is good according to (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway).The OSM wiki also mention that path and cycleway are equivalent.I change it to cycleway beacause path doesnt implies that the way is paved (which causes problems with bike navigation). | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | You also deleted surface=asphalt. Be more careful when reverting someones changeset! | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,032 | This is convention of tagging cycleways in Lithuania, this is how we expect/use it in our software. Be careful when tagging in foreign countries! :-) | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | I understand it. Where can I found those convensions?I'm doing my changes according to OSM Wiki (there is no Lithuanian version of higway=cycleway, so I have no idea about those convensions) | |
| 6 | ~ 2 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,032 | OSM wiki is just an opinion. Not a rule.Lithuanian agreements are here: https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai | |
| 7 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Thanks | |
| 86127398 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-06-03 09:50 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,682 | Hello,What was the logic for changing Chatsworth House into a castle here?Best Regards,Andy |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | From my point of view it looked more like a castle than anything else. But feel free to change it if you have more details.VZ | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,682 | Was that based on a visit or something? I see you changed Castle Howard to a castle too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35902933/history . That changeset says that it's adding a wikidata link, but even its wikipedia page says its not a castle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Castle%20Howa... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, I was adding wikidatas to castles, so maybe the category on Wikipedia confused me. | |
| 129533421 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-11-29 19:17 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | taky by to chtělo dělat aktualizace toho, co tam kreslíš, rozhazování poznámek po mapě nestačí |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Co konkrétního tady chybí? Dnes jsem tudy jel a na žádné změny jsem nenarazil. Rozhodně není moje povinnost aktualizovat nějakou část jen proto, že jsem ji někdy upravoval. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | jo aha, tak budeš kreslit rozestavěné cesty a necháš je trvale rozestavěné? když tak rád mluvíš o slušnosti, bylo by stehně slušné po sobě "uklidit" a když jsi tudy jel tak ten most tam snad nebyl?a ten mo... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Marián Kyral ♦77 | Pokud je tam nějaká změna, tak to uprav dle aktuálního stavu. O tom OSM je. O spolupráci a postupné evoluci. Peskováním ničeho nedosáhneš. Maximálně lidi od mapování odradíš a zůstaneš na v&... | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | Aha, tady někdo objevil Ameriku :D. Jasně, přizvi ještě další kamarády a může tu společně diskutovat. Hlavně se navážet do jiných, to je nejspíš tvoje záliba. Podle tvého názoru je tedy polovina práce lep&s... | |
| 6 | ~ 2 years ago | Marián Kyral ♦77 | Čau, tahle diskuse se mi objevila v RSS a zaujal mně. Nic více.Zřejmě si neuvědomuješ, že mapování nebude nikdy hotovo. Když někde něco jednou zmapuji, není mou povinností se o to navždy starat. Obzvláště, když mi do toho může... | |
| 7 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | Hele, strč si ty přemoudřelé rady někam ... | |
| 8 | ~ 2 years ago | Marián Kyral ♦77 | Díky za podnětnou diskusi. | |
| 9 | ~ 2 years ago | PulisakZ ♦51 | Sorry to start the topic again, but are these roads finished? Czechia CUZK orthophoto does not show any works and around these one 1078421085 on OSM they are finished. | |
| 10 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | No, it is under construction. You can visit rsd.cz for more information. | |
| 145007920 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-12-11 17:17 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | NightH ♦44 | The road 83 is not a trunk, it is a primary road. Yes it has 2x2 lanes and separated junctions, but it still is a primary road by the national authorities. Please do not tag it otherwise. |
| 113494211 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-07 19:51 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Na zaklade coho je https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238573147 access=no? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Už je to 2 roky, opravdu si už nevzpomenu, mohla to být o moje chyba | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | *i | |
| 142363074 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-10-09 19:06 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Awoobis ♦139 | building=ship is documented... it's not going anywhere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dship |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Awoobis ♦139 | building=airplane is logical extension to that | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, there is a note, not to map airplane as building.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:historic%3Daircraft | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Awoobis ♦139 | Thanks, didn't read that one | |
| 144054772 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-11-15 14:41 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Edit: changeset comment is "Stream wikidata #mapycz" |
| 98696306 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-02-04 10:03 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Jiří Komárek ♦18 | Ahoj, prosím tě: mýtné brány se mají značit jinak: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtoll_gantry A vzhledem k tomu, že dneska už se mýtu v ČR nevybírá pomocí mýtných bran, tak by se to mělo hroma... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Jiří Komárek ♦18 | tady můžeš mrknout, jak jsem to změnil u Nákla: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903735617 | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Ahoj, později už jsem to značil tak jako ty. Postupně opravuju ty moje, co jsou špatně značené, ale cíleně je nevyhledávám. Když na to najdu čas tak to zkusím opravit | |
| 143112958 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-10-25 12:21 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Nakaner-repair ♦8,403 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 143150774 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 143112958. These are two stations. Please do not edit complex railway stations if you do not have sufficient local domain knowledge. |
| 141270569 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-09-14 18:07 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | Most tam fyzicky nestojí, objekt bude smazán. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | Most tam fyzicky nestojí, objekt bude smazán. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Změnil jsem na proposed:man_made=bridge | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | Dobrý pokus, takový tag ale neexistuje. Bude smazáno. | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Takový tag právěže existuje. Stačí si na Wiki najít "předpona životního cyklu". Zkuste si i tom něco zjistit, než začnete kritizovat ostatní. | |
| 6 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | tag není zahrnut do menu pro editaci, proto jej nelze použít, to se pak dá podobným způsobem vytvořit jakákoliv blbost | |
| 7 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | To, ale neznamená, že se nesmí používat. Zkuste najít nějaké relevantnější argumenty a neargumentujte blbostmi. | |
| 8 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | Tak sem necpi něco co nejde. | |
| 9 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Asi nechápu co nejde, upravit tag tímto způsobem jde v JOSM i iD Editoru. | |
| 10 | ~ 2 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | Pokud je tag přípustný, automaticky se doplnuje v nabídkovém seznamu tabulky při popisu objektu. To samozřejmě neplatí pro přímý ruční zápis tagu. | |
| 141564592 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-09-21 15:14 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Argbjorn ♦44 | Hi, vojtechzaboril! I disagree about access=no. As wiki says, 'Access values describe legal permissions/restrictions and should follow ground truth'. There're no restriction signs at both sides of the bridge. --- Published using OSMCha: https://... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, I understand you. I removed access=no. Do you have any ideas how to map the fact, that crossing this bridge is dangerous? Thanks | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | skifans ♦37 | Just came across this bridge and yeah it's an an absolutely abismal state and needs something. Calling it a bridge almost feels like an exaggeration. I forded the river rather then using it.I'd like to make the suggestion of removing the highway=path tag but leaving everything else as ... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | In that case, add abandoned:highway=path and highway=abandoned | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | skifans ♦37 | Sounds good to me, I'll give it a bit to see if Argbjorn or anyone else has a view | |
| 6 | ~ 2 years ago | Argbjorn ♦44 | Hi there! Your proposal would make the bridge invisible for routers and, consiquently, for hikers who don't think the bridge is so dangerous.I believe description tag is enough. Out local community suggests to add condition=dilapidated or condition=poor. There isn't perfect decision, so ... | |
| 7 | ~ 2 years ago | skifans ♦37 | Hi! Honestly doing that was sort of my intention. It would still result in 2 seperate paths either side of the river - if people want to look and investigate what crossings there are then that is up to them. And the bridge is still in the data - complete with note. Most of the path has fallen into t... | |
| 141742193 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-09-25 17:48 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | #mapycz (I forgot to add hashtag) |
| 141414532 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-09-18 09:27 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Dawid2849 ♦851 | Construction of these roads is abandoned. You can see this on this more up-to-date picture: https://s14-odcinek2.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/1500-4800-19-2.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Ok | |
| 141414342 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-09-18 09:23 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Edit:source=Bing |
| 140793120 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-09-04 08:46 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | moje_konto ♦202 | www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2240375Are you sure this should be doubled? Informations about the stadium were on the relation, and you added those also on the building. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, the stadium is the building and also the whole area including the inner gap.You are right about doubling those tags, but what is the right place for them? Stadium as building or stadium as leisure?There is an example on wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dstadium) where a... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | moje_konto ♦202 | Hi, yes, it looks tricky with a multipolygon, the stadium linked on Wiki currently has:on relation/multipolygon - only the building,on outer line - the rest.But checking the history - it was changing, so probably there is no single best option. But better to choose one option then mix them, ... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | moje_konto ♦202 | www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140961268I edited as above, should be ok. | |
| 114107842 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-22 17:30 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Tomas_J ♦329 | Ahoj, sem (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1834739713) si doplnal wikidata tag. Preco si nedoplnil aj wikipedia tag? Pytam sa preto, ze ich teraz doplnam, tak aby som neurobil nieco nespravne... Dik. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Ahoj, Wikipedii jsem neřešil, pro můj účel stačila WD, klidně doplň. | |
| 129276661 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-11-23 11:00 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | AlejandroAlba ♦19 | hello! All the mountains and volcanoes that you incorporated in this edition were already in the database. Could you correct so they are not duplicates? |
| 129297383 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-11-23 20:55 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | evod ♦97 | Hi!I believe that connecting the barrier to the road (i.e. that they have a common node) is problematic for usage of OSM data in routing. So I would prefer removing the common node, or only mapping the retaining wall on both sides (as I would argue is the case in the real world). What are your tho... |
| 130118539 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-12-15 14:44 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | chris komang ♦1 | There is no mountain named Bratan. there is a mountain(old name Catur) now: Pucak Mangu but this mountain is not 2276meter mt.Batukaru is 2276 meter.look at: mountains-of-bali.orgfree.complease can you change this. best regards chris |
| 134876882 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-04-13 19:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | R3gi ♦21 | Ahoj, koukám na Tvé úpravy geometrie silnic. Nebylo by lepší nájezdy spíše nechat jak byly? Tj. aby silnice nepřekračovala plnou čáru a zároveň víc vizualizovala místo napojení.Vozidla by měla pro zrych... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Ahoj, osobně jsem došel k tomu způsobu z více důvodů. Při odbočovacím pruhu jej začínám v místě kde končí přerušovaná čára, neboť toto je nejzazší okamžik kdy lze pruh změnit. V případě připoj... | |
| 107553938 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-07-07 10:16 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Upravy pri Holiciach sposobili rozbitie relacie. Prosim uz nenicte SK mapu. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Hej, a nahodne zmeny klasifikacie konca dialnice pri Holiciach (oficialne je to tiez R7, ale samozrejme nie su tam pravidla ako pre dialnicu). Ale tam si to znaci kazdy ako chce, aj po nom to niekto zase zmenil.Zdroj ziadny. Aby sa dalo overit, preco napr. ta nova cyklocesta je access=no. Samozrej... | |
| 126980386 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-10-04 08:29 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,159 | what is highway=virtual? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | I found it somewhere on the wiki. It is a way, which doesn't exist but is needed for the connectivity. Feel free to delete it, but don't forget to modify the barrier to allow bicycles or resurvey the bicycle route. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,159 | I've modified the layout. Let me know if it doesn't work. | |
| 134035213 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-03-23 18:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Plus ostranění "plánované" silnice. |
| 117990261 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-03-01 18:36 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Milaviy4 ♦21 | Which of these two versions of D535 is going to be build? If ever? I haven't seen any progress on either of them |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Which location do you mean? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Milaviy4 ♦21 | Ow sorry about that. The size of the edit is probably what's confusing. Anyway: I was asking about the D535 road near Ravča junction on the Highway A1. If you check closely, there are two versions. One edited by you, and one by some other guy. I just want to know, which version is considered t... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, I think I just edited the N most point of the proposed road and don't really found out that there is two variants. You can view the history of that was to find the original author. | |
| 132012736 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-02-02 17:34 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | imperiumultimum ♦3 | Hi, the roundabout is not there yet, it will be constructed in spring. There is a temporary connection next to the Slovnaft gas station. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, please fix it. Many thanks | |
| 131026378 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-01-08 18:37 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Jakuje ♦64 | Proc jsi menil tvar strechy nove tramvajove zastavky, kdyz vubec neodpovida realnemu tvaru?Proc jsi pripojil nastupiste v podzemi k chodniku na povrchu? Pises zdroj bing, ale na bing fotomapach neni ze strechy videt vubec nic. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Pardon, koukal jsem i do nějaké stavební dokumentace, ale asi nebyla aktuální. Prosím o revert této sady. Případně ji revertnu sám. V | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Jakuje ♦64 | Ted jsem to prekreslil od oka jak jsem se tam dnes byl projit. Predpokladam, ze "nejaka stavebni dokumentace" asi neni nekde k dispozici k mapovani, co? | |
| 130815276 by vojtechzaboril @ 2023-01-03 08:05 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Piskvor ♦452 | Diky, tyhle dva kousky mi utekly v predchozim editu. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Není za co, taky se mi to stává | |
| 113532265 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-08 17:49 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244628521 ved v roku 1820 ulica ani neexistovala (boli tu lesy). Aj ta wiki, odkial to neopravnene odpisujete, pise nieco ine. Takze co ma byt to start_date=1820s? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den,buď to bude můj překlep nebo jsem to tak vložil omylem. Opravím. Díky.V | |
| 130247430 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-12-19 12:38 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Jan Olieslagers ♦209 | Thanks for the addition! May I inquire where the LZMASN local_ref was sourced from? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, there is a link on WD page to airports database where I found it.V | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Jan Olieslagers ♦209 | ? sorry, not very clear ... ? what is "WD"? what is the link? | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | In the object of airport there is the LZMAST ref and also wikidata link (https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q115712290) in which is the link to database (https://www.dl.cz/LZMASN).I'm sorry for too brief answer previously. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | Jan Olieslagers ♦209 | Apologies cheerfully accepted :) ! And it is now clear that the code stems from one private publisher - nothing wrong with that. Thanks again! | |
| 117331770 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-02-12 18:27 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Pontiac_CZ ♦33 | Ahoj, Fort XIII na Nové ulici jsi přejmenoval na "Fort VIII Holice" proč? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Ahoj,podle některých zdrojů (památkový ústav) se tak jmenuje. Myslím, že jsem to dělal především pro sjednocení formátu názvů fortů u Olomouce. Pokud však máte nějaký důvěryhodnější ... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Pontiac_CZ ♦33 | Ony jsou číslovány sekvenčně od jedničky po směru hodinových ručiček. A osmička už tam jedna je - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117331770#map=17/49.55974/17.27952Fort XIII (č. p. 1303) má v Památkovém ústavu záznam https... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Jo pardon, už vidím v čem je problém. Musel jsem omylem změnit 13 na 8. Sry. | |
| 113380653 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-04 18:35 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, aj tie semafory na Panonskej ceste na krizovatke s Labutou ulicou ste zistili z Wikipedie (odkial nesmiete nic kopirovat)? A este ani po roku nefunguju (su vypnute), kedze Labutia je stale nepristupna vo vystavbe. A Vy ste ich zadali ako funkcne. Zase zmeny bez rozmyslu a uvedenia legalneho... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, zdrojem semaforů Wikipedia určitě není. Nejspíše jsem to zakreslil z Ortofota. Ale opravdu si nepamatuji všechno co jsem dělal před 7 měsíci.V | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | No na Orotofoto je vidiet, ze ta Labutia je zablokovana, takze mat tam aktivne semafory by nemalo velmi zmysel. Ak odhadujete existenciu a funkcnost semaforov podla tych par tienov, ktore su na Ortofoto mozno vidiet, neviem ci je to spravny postup. | |
| 117804311 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-02-24 09:48 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ivanbranco ♦2,834 | Hi,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120040926seems weird to have a number in the name. 1623 was maybe the year the church was built? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi,it was a mistake. I fixed it.Regards.V | |
| 123696748 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-07-16 17:19 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Piskvor ♦452 | Ahoj, týhle relaci nerozumím: jestli to má znamenat "odbočit smí vlevo z Národní na Mas.nábřeží všichni, jen ne cyklisti," (v terénu i podle poznámky by to tak vypadalo) tak je v mapě vyznačená obr&aa... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den,relaci jsem nijak neupravoval. Pokud se podívám do historie, tak v tomto stavu je již 7 let od vaší sady změn (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31213507). Nejspíše jsem jen třeba rozdělil nějakou cestu, která v relaci by... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Piskvor ♦452 | Aha, to je možný. Že bych to tehdy byl udělal blbě já? To je taky dost dobře možný, opravím. | |
| 125358020 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-08-25 11:54 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1089058856. What is the meaning of the tag 1945 = květen 1955? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, i just copied it from a node, making a polygon. I will try to solve it, it has to be a mistake. | |
| 123625536 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-07-14 20:51 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ◪ Jarv ♦241 | You have changed the old slip road into a service road. However this is not a service road. it is a completely abandoned motorway slip road which is not used for even service access. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | The fact that its not used is reflected by access=no. How do you suggest tagging it? The road is still visible. Regards. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | ◪ Jarv ♦241 | I would have left it how it was. disused:highway = motorway_link shows that it is a highway, and disused as part of its lifecycle. disused:highway would suggest that the physical carriageway is still present, but disused which reflects the situation. It hasn't taken up any other purpose so does... | |
| 123602123 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-07-14 10:21 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | yasslay ♦95 | Hello! St Saviour's Close appears to be a cul-de-sac with a grassy patch in the middle and I have addressed the fixme request.Kind regards,AOOSMU |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | I changed it to turning_loop instead of turning_circle. In my opinion, it has the correct meaning.Regards.V | |
| 122677553 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-06-21 16:59 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | NunoCaldeira ♦565 | hello, can you explain why you changed the name of the ways, when the government legislation says the opposite? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, which names I changed? I just add English names and fix the locals according to sign at the tunnels. Greetings. V | |
| 116266402 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-01-17 18:20 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Pridavat wikidata na dialnicne exity ktore sa len nahodou volaju po najblizsej ulici je asi hlupost. Napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33033459 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den,blbost to určitě je.Nejspíš to vzniklo omylem.Opravím to.V | |
| 115137908 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-12-19 19:53 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | pehavel ♦4 | Zdravím, proč měníte silnici 1. třídy 1/33 od Semonic směrem k HK na silnici 2. třídy? Podle mapy ze ŘSD na https://geoportal.rsd.cz/apps/silnicni_a_dalnicni_sit_cr_verejna/ je stále vedena jako silnice první třídy. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den,měl jsem za to, že se takto po zprovoznění dalnice změnila. Každopádně existuje více podobných silnic, napadá mě třeba I47, která je pořád ve vlastnictví ŘSD, ale je označena jako secondary.V | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | pehavel ♦4 | Máte k této změně nějaký jiný zdroj nebo pokyn? Pokud je to jen domněnka, řídil bych se oficiálním stavem na ŘSD. Tam je podle mapy trasa stále vedena jako "silnice I. třídy". Zároveň propojka mezi 1/33 a d&aacut... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den,asi máte v tomto pravdu. Změním to zpět.Jinak zdroj rsd jsem uvedl i především kvůli přetrasování E67. | |
| 120048881 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-04-22 12:26 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Edit: Metro D |
| 119476258 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-04-08 15:47 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1050310672. What is the meaning of the tag 5 = 5.5? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Yep, its just a mistake. I deleted the tag. Thanks a lot.V | |
| 118749031 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-03-21 19:10 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | edit: changeset_name >> road geometry |
| 113936794 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-18 10:04 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, naco su dobre vymyslene cesty ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003913184? A tie asi z wikipedie tiez nemate. Podobne https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003913183, sice tam vyliaty asfalt je ale povazovat to za cestu je sporne a este k tomu za dve cesty (s https://www.openstreetmap.org... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Dalej preco vymaz https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2688836802 ?A cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003913185 ? Podla snimok Ortofotomozaiky ide cez novu budovu a je vidiet, ze je tou budovou prerusena. Mate nejaky tajny lepsi zdroj? Snad tu novovyzerajucu budovu uz zburali? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Máte pravdu, tato cesta nedává smysl: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003913184. Odstranil jsem ji stejně jako další podobné případy | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Tento bod jsem najspíš smazal omylem https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2688836802, napravím to | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Ale ten bod 2688836802 ste neobnovili, ale ste vytvorili novy. Tak sa to nerobi, teraz sa tvarite ako autor tych udajov.A neodpovedali ste na tu cestu pri Vapenke. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý večer,bod 2688836802 se mi nepodařilo obnovit, ani s pomocí wiki jsem nepřišel na to, jak revertnout smazání bodu, předpokládám, že víte jak na to, prosím vás tedy o radu. Díky | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Ohledně cesty ve Vápence nevím, co jsem udělal špatně. Myslím, že máte za to, že jsem ji tam tak zakreslil já, mám ale pocit, že jsem tu původní jen rozdělil (proto jsem u této části jako autor) a zakreslil její no... | |
| 8 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Na wiki obnovenie objektu nie je, je to vec konkretneho editoru. Kedze pouzivate JOSM, tak je to v menu Soubor -> Obnovit objekt.Pri Vapenke neviem preco spominate inu cestu, ked som pisal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003913185 . Mate pravdu, cesta tam bola uz davno pred Vami (napr. htt... | |
| 9 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, v menu Soubor bohužel nemám nic jako Obnovit objekt. Jako Wiki jsem myslel Wiki k JOSM Reverteru (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter)Ohledně vápenky jsem nejspíš neudělal vše co jsem měl, tedy nezakreslil budovu. | |
| 10 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Da sa pouzit aj reverter, ale takto pre jeden objekt je jednoduchsie to "Obnovit objekt". Polozku pridava tento plugin do JOSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Undelete . Aktivujete si ho v nastaveniach JOSM -> pluginy .Obnovil som pomocou toho povodny bod: https://... | |
| 11 | ~ 3 years ago | Dodko ♦1,300 | Na obnovu treba naištalovať plugin Undelete.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Undelete | |
| 12 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Děkuji za rady oběma. | |
| 13 | ~ 3 years ago | Patr1k_P ♦471 | a to place sa nepouziva pre neobyvane lokality? | |
| 14 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Tipujem, ze kedysi to bola neobyvana oblast. Ale to uz je otazka na povodneho autora bodu, nie tu. | |
| 15 | ~ 3 years ago | Patr1k_P ♦471 | No ja som narážal prečo ste trvali na obnovenie toho bodu keďže v dnešnej dobe to už neobývaná lokalita asi moc nie je | |
| 113298563 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-02 19:11 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Vy si naozaj nedate povedat, zase pochybne premenovanie mosta Lanfranconi:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282404783Keby ste si pozreli historiu objektu, zistili by ste, ze bol nedavno zamerne premenovany:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110336928Este aj na wikistranke, na ktoru ... |
| 113247621 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-01 17:30 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, to ako ste na wikipedii zistili, ze cesty okolo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925401901 su uz so zakazom vstupu? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Podobne predlzenie cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117172148 na severozapad je dost sporne, ked to vediete cez ostrovcek. Na najnovsich snimkach tam nic take nie je, ale keby ste si vsimli v tej oblasti sa to pred rokom zmenilo a zakreslil som to podla reality, kedze som tam bol (survey). Te... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, pardon, ale zapomněl jsem uvést Ortofoto Mozaic jako zdroj. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Nenapadlo mě, že je již zmapována aktuálnější situace než je na ortofotu, za což se omlouvám a prosím vás o opravu. Osobně v těchto případech staré cesty nemažu, jen změním tagy např na was:highway=*, abych přede&scar... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Ano to je dobry pristup. Treba si pozerat aj historiu objektov, aby ste videli kedy sa to naposledy menilo. A tie cesty prave prislupne su (ziadne access=no), aby sa auta dostali k tomu predajnemu miestu Nesto. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Inak tu krizovatku v novsom stave je uz vidiet na snimkach Maxar. Tam uvidite, ze moj stav je spravny. Teraz som to vratil do povodneho stavu. | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Děkuju, kouknu se na to. Jinak se ještě jednou omlouvám. | |
| 117958995 by vojtechzaboril @ 2022-02-28 20:55 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Tomas_J ♦329 | Nádhera. Plánujete mapovat i kryt na Parukářce a jine? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, bohužel se mi nepodařilo dohledat jakékoliv podklady, resp. se v nich správně zorientovat. Zatím tedy spíše ne. | |
| 106731229 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-06-21 18:01 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | manojkmohan ♦80 | Hi. Adding boundary and Admin level tags in ways not need. for that we handling that with relations. Pls check this https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11538927 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11302892 |
| 113025833 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-10-27 08:37 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | A na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24828660 ste zmenili Kuneradská na Kunerádska, lebo ste to opisali z Wikipedie. Pritom v registri adries je to Kuneradská, co je po slovensky spravne, ak je to pomenované podla obce Kunerad. Wikipedia to má podla mna zle. Ano,... |
| 113808013 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-15 14:26 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, preco nam nahodne prepisujete nazvy ulic? Neviete si ani len pozriet historiu objektov? Mozno by ste sa dozvedeli preco su tak pomenovane, napr.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98236818 . Gratulujem k dokladnemu bordelu v adresach v Bratislave: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den,čerpal jsem z oficiální osm Wiki, která tvrdí, že do name patří celé názvy, nikoliv zkratky. Pokud je z nějakého důvody třeba zachovat zkrácený název, hodilo by se to mít třeba v tagu note z... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Suhlasim, ale tu neslo o skratky, ale oficialne nazvy. Ano, mozete namietat ze moze byt v 'name' plny nazov a oficialny nazov v 'official_name' (co vacsinou byva dlhsi nazov, tu by bol kratsi).Je to zial vecna debata aj na slovenskom fore a snazime sa to upratovat podla roznych... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Inak to s tym "plnym nazvom do 'name'" ste si neprecitali kompletne:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29Mate tam viacero prikladov, kedy sa nazov nema expandovat. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Díky za vysvětlení. Pořád to ale neřeší třeba náb. > nábrežie atd. | |
| 114396384 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-30 10:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Zdravim. Jednu vec po sebe opravite, dakujem, a hned vytvorite novu chybu. Posunuli ste nod kde sa spajaju cesty a vytvorili cestu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007591583 ktora ma akoze 4 pruhy, ale ja tam vidim len 3,5 pruhu. Stoji mam to za to? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, tohle je jen otázkou pojetí toho co je pruh, pokud pruh končí má se značit až do jeho konce nebo jen do chvíle kdy se začne zužovat? Zastávám názor že končí až na konci, tedy když přestane existovat. Za mě te... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Je za tym subjektivny pohlad, ale nebolo by na skodu aby to bolo vsade maximalne rovnake. V pripade Slovenska sme to mali na celkom SK nastavene +- rovnako. Ak si vyberate len hrozienka, tak potom rozbijate jednotnost. Prosim upravte to na celkom SK alebo vratte zmeny spat. Nie vzdy kvantita uprav z... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, chápu vás a uznávám váš argument, budu to na Slovensku dělat stejně, tedy končit tam kde se pruh začíná zužovat.V | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Dakujem. Cca pred rokom som zjednotil cele Slovenko, ci uz podla aktualnej ortofoto a na novych usekoch poda video zaznamov ci poznacenych gps pozicii.Pekny den. | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Pruh v OSM konci tam, kde konci jeho plna sirka, teda kde sa zacina zuzovat. Nie je to vymysel Slovenska, je to na wiki, napr. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations | |
| 77171938 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-11-16 18:30 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ravipalev ♦7 | It is a flyover, tunnel is not correct --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/77171938 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Fixed right now | |
| 77172199 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-11-16 18:42 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ravipalev ♦7 | It is flyover we should give bridge not tunnel --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/77172199 |
| 115003965 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-12-16 11:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦6,918 | Hi,could you check the bicycle parkings you edited here? They got a "typ_stojan" tag - I guess you wanted to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Oh. That's my mistake. It's a ramain of imported data. I will fix it. Thanks | |
| 114935762 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-12-14 18:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | Když už kritizuješ ostatní, tak sám dodržuj celistvost map. Tady je chyba. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Můžete specifikovat včem je dle vás chyba. Díky | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | v tagování koleje | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Díky za specifikaci. Kolej je dle mě otagovana správně. Můžete prosím říct co je dle vás špatně např. usage=industrial je špatně. Díky | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | tak možná že se to ještě nepřekreslilo v zobrazení ale svítí to tam pěkně | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, když se podívám do historie tohoto prvku, vidím, že jste jej před 9 měsíci vytvořil právě vy. Asi před měsícem provedl úpravu někdo další, ale tagy nezměnil. Poslední editace je moje, a opravuje nejsp&i... | |
| 114842078 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-12-12 10:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | A tady je co ??? V tomto úseku není ostrůvek mezi jízdními pruhy ani svodidla, jen patníky !!! Tak proč sem kreslíš dvě samostatné silnice ??? Děláš to samé co kritizuješ u ostatních, napřed si rozmysli, ... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, patník je překážka, kterou nelze přejet (běžně). Proto je silnici zakreslena takto.S pozdravem. VZ | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | jenže ty patníky jsou přenosné, konkrétně to jsou pouze vodící desky, které tam jsou umístěny dočasně, na silnici je dvojitá plná čára a tu jinak přejed lze | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | V tom případě to zakreslím jako jednu cestu. Díky za upozornění. | |
| 113741580 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-11-13 18:48 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Oprava: D56 |
| 111587927 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-09-23 11:44 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | highflyer74 ♦2,451 | Hello!Please do not add random disconnected highway parts that are not even highways. I am referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986220084 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986220083.I am sorry but they will be removed again. All the best to you! |
| 112626106 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-10-17 20:16 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦6,918 | Hi,you used many tags like "proposed_maxspeed" here. There's a slight spelling mistake: It should be "proposed:maxspeed". Could you check these roads and fix this? |
| 112129831 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-10-05 15:49 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Edit: source is "North Rhine-Westphalia aerial photograph" instead of "Metropole Ruhr: Luftbilder (10 cm)" |
| 111287889 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-09-16 12:00 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | 'wd' ako 'wikidata'? Az tak by ste pismenami setrit nemuseli. Ale inak dakujeme. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Pardon, nenapadlo mě, že tato zkratka není úplně obecně známá. | |
| 111493836 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-09-21 12:17 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | streckenkundler ♦1,126 | Please never use Bing for Brandenburg! Only use this source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/GeoportalA second comment on: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27270907The ref was correct. Compare the signposting at this point. I will restore the ref tag. Yes, it's funny, but... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Okay. Thanks for your advice. I think that the ref is just a mistake, sorry for that.Vojtech | |
| 106349237 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-06-14 16:58 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Dobrý deň, podľa miestopisu je daná cesta označená I/12. Prečo ste jej zrušili hodnotu ref? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Chybu treba opraviť. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Máte li na mysli toto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253871010,tak opravím.V | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Dobrý deň, človek by očakával pri takom množstve úprav že viete pozrieť do histórie. Tak isto, že poznáte aj zdroje kde sú uvedené oficiálne informácie. Už chápem všetku tú povrchnú prácu...ht... | |
| 107553088 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-07-07 10:06 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Illio ♦89 | Zdravím. Názov mosta "Lužný most" ešte nie je schválený. Prečo ste ho presunuli z proposed:name do name? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Zdravím. To by aj mňa zaujímalo. Tento pánko veľmi rád upravuje veci na Slovensku, ale bez znalosti súvislosti! | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Most cez Dunaj nebude mať 3 pruhy. Nekomunikujete a vyslovene škodíte mape. Do keby budete škodiť???Žiadam Vás vyhýbajte sa Slovensku.To sa tak nerobí do psej matere! | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Sorry, beriem späť, tie 3 pruhy tam pridal Rafael Osvald, Vy ste len niektoré cesty rozdelili.PS: To že nekomunikujte a od stola meníte cesty platí, t.j. škodíte mape. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Po úpravách vojtechzaboril-a utrpeli aj relácie. | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Moze teda niekto opravit ten pocet pruhov? Dakujem. | |
| 7 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Neviem či sa oplatí snažiť, veď príde rúbať vojtechzaboril ;) Zmaže segmenty s históriou a nahradí ich novými, vlastnými. | |
| 105679157 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-06-01 12:47 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, ako piseme inde, tato zmena je celkom dobre, nove polohy ciest sedia lepsie na snimky Ortofotomozaiky (povodny stav bol z katastra a inych zdrojov), ale tiez ste urobili par chyb ako zbytocne odstranenie a znovuvytvorenie motorway_junction cim nicite historiu, posuvanie rozpajania jaznych p... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Na dialniciach v SR sa snazime pouzivat koncepciu rozdelovania jazdnych pruhov podla nasledovnych wiki stranok:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_linkhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_assist/Examples/Motorway_exithttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_assist/Ex... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobrý den, mám na to stejný názor. Také tuto koncepci využívám, buď to tak takto bylo předtím, nebo jsem to špatně zakreslil, za což se omlouvám. V | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zial v minulosti ste cesty, co uz takto boli zakreslene, zmenili a porusili tuto koncepciu (a a ste nereagovali na komentar). Takze ak podla nej postupujete, davajte vacsi pozor. Dakujem | |
| 105622990 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-05-31 12:11 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Zdravim. Videli ste tuto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949019166 cestu postavenu? Ona sa spolocne s D4 nestavia. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Dnes uz tretia uprava od stola! Tato https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949053271 cesta nie je postavena a ani dlhe roky nebude. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Teraz vidim, ze ste zrusili cestu v smere BA ako v stutocnosti vedie. Nicite mapu!!! Ziadam Vas o vratenie stavu vsetkych ciest ako boli nakolko 100% zodpovedali skutocnosti. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | vojtechzaboril uz zase nici cesty po Slovensku? A dokonca tvrdi, ze zdroj je "survey". Takze ak to tam v skutocnosti takto nevyzera, tak klame. Treba ho nahlasit na DWG a zablokovat a odstranit jeho zmeny. Ani popisy sad zmien nepise poriadne (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/vojtechzabo... | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Omlouvám se, zdroj jsem chybně uvedl. Správně tam mělo být ortophoto mosaic slovakia.Většina mých změn souvisí pouze se zpřesněním polohy dálnice/silnice dle leteckých snímků. Opravdu se nesnažím mapy ničit. Oml... | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Su zmeny, ktore su podla ortophoto, ale vo viacerych si len primitivne domyslate stav. Tam kde je hlina inej farby neznamena ze bude teraz cesta, aj ste zrusili skutocnu cestu. Dokazete dat 3 vyjazdy po sebe, rusite historiu ciest... a v pripade tunela na D1, ktory nema vysutazeneho zhotovitela tech... | |
| 7 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Podla Ortofoto je mozne kreslit hotove objekty. Ale nemozete podla rok starych snimok menit objekty, ktore ini ludia menili nedavno podla inych novsich zdrojov. Ked kreslite od stola (co nie je nutne zle) treba trochu s citom a zamysliet sa ci uz nie je v OSM novsi stav. Pozriet si vzdy historiu obj... | |
| 8 | ~ 4 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zmeny v Rakusku nevyzeraju az tak zle, ale tiez robite chyby (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105694941). Davajte viac pozor, rovnako napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949385846 . Ale to v Rakusku su zrejme uz hotove dialnice viditelne na snimkach. Ale na rozostavanych dialniciach neuv... | |
| 105694941 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-06-01 19:08 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Nielkrokodil ♦110 | Achtung, bei dieser Änderung wurde die Wienerwald-Relation zerschossen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/918904Ich versuche mal, ob ich es wieder hinbekomme. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | I'm so sorry. Thank you for the correction. Can I ask you what was that mistake I made? Thanks. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Nielkrokodil ♦110 | Hi,I think you accidently closed (=connected both ends) this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26381133which is part of the outer-polygon of the Wienerwald-Mutlipolygon.I recognised it when suddenly parts of the Wienerwald did not render any more. Best Nielkrokodil | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Hi, thank you once more, for the explanation especially. Best regards.V | |
| 105624429 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-05-31 12:34 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Zdravim. Dalsia potrebna uprava... |
| 105614570 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-05-31 09:58 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Zdravim. Aky ma zmysel uvazdat rychlost v tuneli, ktory este nema narysovanu ani ciarku v projekte? |
| 105616678 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-05-31 10:28 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Zdravim. Odstranili ste cesty, ktore boli v sulade s dokumentaciu a po vasich upravach zostali 3 miesta na ktorych je motorway_junction 25. Mate nejaku dokumentaciu, ktora moze byt aktualnejsia? |
| 79459765 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-01-11 20:06 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | ty potoky co jsou podél dálnice, sjezdů u pod. by asi bylo lepší mapovat jako příkop nebo strouhu s tagem vysychající (stažení dešťové vody), např. https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=18/50.03198/14.28361 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | HaPe-CZ ♦99 | o pardon, to kreslil někdo jinej | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | V pořádku. Sám jsem nevěděl, jestli to náhodou není moje chyba. | |
| 99264757 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-02-14 19:52 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Dobry den. Minimalne pol roka si vsimam, ze upravujete geometriu podla nejakych iluzii, nastavuje kategorie v rozpore so skutocnostou a ine nezmysly. Komu tato https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/48.4660/19.5496 uprava R2 prospela? Vyzyvam vas prestante nezmyselne upravovat mapu! |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Dobry den, většinu těchto změn jsem dělal na základě katastrálních map. Kategorie a značení silnic neměním a určitě si je nevymýšlím. Na otázky typu "komu tato změna prospěla" reagovat nebudu. S pozdravem. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | mapko ♦113 | Ak je v katastralnej mape zavadzajuci stav tak sup s nim do OSM? Ani nahodou sa vam nezadala tak upravena krizovatka nejako znetvorena? | |
| 98158702 by vojtechzaboril @ 2021-01-26 09:18 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mueschel ♦6,918 | Hi,could you check this node, something went wrong with the name tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8363794082 |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | vojtechzaboril | I accidentally typed name instead of tag. I will fix it. Thanks | |
| 92831761 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-10-21 12:01 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | FrameXX ♦3 | Děkuji vám Vojto že jste přidal to nové el. vedení poblíž pramenů ve Slavkovském lese. Dnes jsem tamtudy šel a všiml si že nové vedení v mapě není, ale když jsem se doma podíval do editoru příjemně mě pře... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | EFT2 ♦1 | Dle informací z webu oenergetice.cz by mělo být původní vedení Vítkov – Přeštice 220 kV zrušeno a nahrazeno 400 kV (V490/V491) s uvedením do provozu v roce 2022. Pouze informuji, nevím v jakém stavu se vedení nach&... | |
| 86288809 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-06-06 19:32 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdraivm, preco posuvate spajacie a rozpajacie body odbociek z dialnice (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/319676122) z pozicii, na ktorych tu boli? Maju byt na miestach kde sa fyzicky rozpajaju/spajaju cesty, nie kde zacina plna ciara a akoze sa neda uz prejst do odbocovacieho pruhu. Ale sani... |
| 92190735 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-10-08 18:14 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | sokol15 ♦32 | Prosím, nepředbíhejme realitu. Přeložka silnice ještě není hotová, jezdí se po starém. Dnes jsem tam jel. |
| 91002083 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-09-16 18:21 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mueschel ♦6,918 | Hi,please check these edits. The nodes all have several strange tags that don't look like they should be in OSM, e.g.ref_GmlID=zony260.99ref_id_pa=131ref_ogc_fid=99 |
| 86920473 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-06-20 20:15 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, prosim neposuvajte koniec pripajacieho pruhu (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26107988) az na miesto, kde konci plna ciara a je mozne sa preradit. Bod ma byt tam, kde sa cesty fyzicky spajaju, bez ohladu na moznost preradenia sa medzi jazdnymi pruhmi. Na to sluzi znacka 'chang... |
| 89268282 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-08-11 20:05 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Comment change: Obchvat Opočna |
| 88822890 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-08-01 19:14 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, prosim skuste pisat zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn |
| 86200646 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-06-04 17:08 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, naco bolo potrebne zalozit novu relaciu pre rieku Zitava, ked uz jedna existovala (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5538519) ? Okrem toho pokial viem z wikipedie sa nesmie nic odpisovat, okrem hodnot do znaciek wikipedia a wikidata. |
| 88263362 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-07-20 19:50 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,548 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/828240794. What is the meaning of the tag 3.45 = 4.1? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | vojtechzaboril | Its my mistake, thank you for notice. It must be width=3.45. I accidentaly changed key instead of value. I will repair it. | |
| 85147173 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-05-13 13:08 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Milancer ♦49 | Zdravím, nedávejte prosím na provozované silnice tag "proposed". Některé routovací programy přes tyto silnice neroutují a hledají objízdné trasy.Děkuji.https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osr... |
| 85069720 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-05-12 07:54 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | YjM ♦20 | Ahoj,stromy se v KN neevidují a ve snímcích z Bingu taky ještě být vidět nemohou.Jakým způsobem jsi je mapoval?Díky |
| 82918970 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-04-01 10:59 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | tkk ♦49 | Zdravim, proc jste u uzlu 5115564838 odstranil polozku ref? V cem vam vadila?Dekuji tom.k |
| 69614873 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-04-26 20:27 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mmahmud ♦32 | Hello, Osmose is showing issues for inconsistent tagging for a Primary road you drew. It has both highway = primary & construction = primary tags. Any of the one should be used. Can you confirm if the construction is completed and fix the issue? Here is the road: https://www.openstreetmap... |
| 80550801 by vojtechzaboril @ 2020-02-04 19:13 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦6,918 | Hi,this way got 2 'proposed' and 2 'ref' tags - which one is right?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766225066Jan |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | vojtechzaboril | First it will be primary (I/34), then it will be reclassified to secondary (II/634) | |
| 78439386 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-12-15 20:23 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, aky je toto za experiment? Preco preklasifikovavate navrhovane useky D3 na uz hotove dialnice a potom na servisne cesty? Existuju tie useky vobec? Je tam uz nieco postavene? |
| 78071229 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-12-06 20:28 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | tkk ♦49 | Zdravim, prosim o kontrolu cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309027067 - jsou tam hodne podivne upravy pro nazvy tagu ref a source, to je bud preklep nebo jina chyba. Dekuji. |
| 75925477 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-10-19 10:00 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | literan ♦6,985 | Согласно https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification тег highway=motorway_link ставится на те отрезки, "на которых действуют те же правила движения, что и на highway=motorway.". В России (в... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | literan ♦6,985 | https://yandex.ru/maps/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=37.044164%2C56.139215&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=128.768077%2C0.282616&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.044385%2C56.139658&panorama%5Bspan%5D=117.343977%2C72.630440&z=16.24 например | |
| 71701377 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-06-28 10:02 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,905 | hola. estás editando Panamá, haciendo referencia a Colombia. o sea, seguramente está bien, pero el comentario es "misleading> |
| 71106993 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-06-10 15:16 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | azakh-world ♦287 | Hi.Please, combine railway=station with associated stop_positions, platforms and subway_entrances via a stop_area relation. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping#Stop_Area |
| 71068773 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-06-09 11:15 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | azakh-world ♦287 | Hello.Metro data is used in application and has rather complex structure, so it's worth to change it with care. Please correct Blue Line of Delhi metro:1) "Indaprastha" and "Yamuna Bank (Blue Line)" now have duplicate station objects (objects with railway=station tag). C... |
| 67630269 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-02-27 20:23 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | aceman444 ♦2,798 | Zdravim, ta krizovatka pri ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673459529 je trochu prekomplikovana na to aka je bezvyznamna a ani to nemate dobre, nezakreslili ste zakazy odbocenia.A prosim priste zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien ako "#update". Dakujem. |
| 66398960 by vojtechzaboril @ 2019-01-17 15:17 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Piskvor ♦452 | Dobrý den, podle leteckých snímků pořizovaných na konci roku 2018 jsou PAPI pro RWY 12 tam, kde byly zmapovány před touto úpravou - před několika lety došlo k jejich přesunu, jak je dosud vidět i na snímcích ( http://i.imgur.com/U... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Piskvor ♦452 | Pro Prahu jsou pro OSM k dispozici aktuální ortofotomapy IPR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:WikiProjekt_%C4%8Cesko/freemap#Ortofotomapy_IPR_Praha |