33 Changesets created by vsahith have been discussed with 20 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor
Changeset # ⏱️ Last updated Contributor Comment
126445097
by vsahith
@ 2022-09-21 04:08
~ 3 years ago
1 ~ 3 years agovsahith Added a path as per Driver feedback
126218885
by vsahith
@ 2022-09-15 11:00
~ 3 years ago
1 ~ 3 years agovsahith Hi , edit made based on driver feedback.
Thanks,
vsahith.
123181803
by vsahith
@ 2022-07-04 09:48
~ 3 years ago
1 ~ 3 years agovsahith added access restriction as per driver feedback
122308245
by vsahith
@ 2022-06-13 06:34
~ 3 years ago
1 ~ 3 years agovsahith Added a delivery restrictions as per driver feedback
122008715
by vsahith
@ 2022-06-06 07:24
~ 3 years ago
1 ~ 3 years agovsahith Added delivery restrictions based on driver feedback
116850896
by vsahith
@ 2022-02-01 06:26
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agovsahith Added restrictions based on Driver feedback
95921902
by vsahith
@ 2020-12-16 07:13
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agoalzyee
♦26
Which changeset and why?
2 ~ 4 years agovsahith Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the changeset. I have reverted a non-existent primary link road which was wrongly added in the changeset #93603242, the necessary changes have been made and the roads have been re-aligned in the changeset #95922439.
Let me know if there are any further concerns regardin...
114875413
by vsahith
@ 2021-12-13 09:37
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agovsahith Added an access based on driver feedback
114432467
by vsahith
@ 2021-12-01 07:59
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agovsahith Hi ,
Edited access tag as per Driver feedback.
Thanks,
vsahith.
114121173
by vsahith
@ 2021-11-23 03:30
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agovsahith Added a access restriction based on driver feedback
113680815
by vsahith
@ 2021-11-12 06:55
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agovsahith Added access restrictions based on Driver feedback.
113509708
by vsahith
@ 2021-11-08 08:01
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agovsahith Edited access tag as per Driver feedback.
112680039
by vsahith
@ 2021-10-19 06:06
~ 4 years ago
1 ~ 4 years agorjgambrel
♦27
The edit you made introduces navigation mistakes: You have made it impossible for S bound traffic to turn East and impossible for N bound traffic to turn W. Please make corrections to this edit
2 ~ 4 years agovsahith Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing the feedback.
I have made the necessary corrections in the changeset #112744183.
Please do let me know, If incase there are any more suggestions regarding this edit.
Thanks once again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Rega...
3 ~ 4 years agorjgambrel
♦27
Vsahith, thank you for taking the time to look at the issue and make changes. I am going to suggest what I think it is a better change (although for complicated intersections like this there can be differences of opinions). I tried the change I am proposing and it seems like it will work and look be...
4 ~ 4 years agovsahith Hi,
Thank you for the checking and validating the edit. I appreciate the insights provided on the changes made.
Since this intersection is complicated and seems to be a busy intersection, it would be a great help if you can make the necessary changes required, so that i can follow the same in futu...
5 ~ 4 years agorjgambrel
♦27
Vsahith. I made the changes. Not perfect but the crossovers now show how cars would flow from S to W and from N to E. My changeset is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112846245 This link should zoom in on the intersection: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=112680039#map=19/45.06...
103020105
by vsahith
@ 2021-04-15 22:53
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoiandees
♦1,284
Hello! Normally we don't split a road into a dual carriageway unless there's a physical barrier between the two carriageways. Snelling doesn't have that physical barrier along this piece of road. Would you consider undoing this change?
---

Publi...
2 ~ 5 years agovsahith Hi,

Thanks for the reviewing the changeset, I have used Bing/Esri world(2020) and Private Maxar imageries for the edit made and I've also attached the screenshot of Bing imagery 2020 (https://snipboard.io/UoEZdh.jpg) where the physical barrier is visible .
Please let us know if there are a...
3 ~ 5 years agoiandees
♦1,284
Thanks, I see it now. The separation was farther south than I had looked.
78450048
by vsahith
@ 2019-12-16 04:38
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoblackboxlogic
♦459
I'm really curious about your decision to add this turn restriction. I see there is a sign there, but it is facing south west and you added a restriction from the North East
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10415026
2 ~ 5 years agovsahith Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit. Apologies for the wrong edit, I've made the necessary changes in the changeset(#101490044). Looking forward to learn from you.

Regards,
vsahith.
96409710
by vsahith
@ 2020-12-25 06:09
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agodbaron
♦82
Why was this edit made? There's no physical barrier or divider here, so I don't think this road should be dual carriageway.
2 ~ 5 years agovsahith Hi ,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I had split the road based on the barrier which is visible in bing ariel imagery and mapillary street side (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=jlgDVe0lAaAybf0Gz5YBka&focus=photo&lat=37.452466359622754&lng=-122.15964248826936&z=17).Please let...
92894906
by vsahith
@ 2020-10-22 12:01
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoSparks
♦38
Greetings. I just reverted this change. This road is no longer there due to recent construction. Thanks!
2 ~ 5 years agovsahith Hi ,
Thanks for looking into my edits and making a necessary changes, Always happy to learn from community.
Regards,
vsahith.
3 ~ 5 years agoSparks
♦38
No worries, just wanted to let you know why I was making a change to one of your edits. Wish there was a better way to communicate when roadways go away but are still showing up on imagery. Thanks for your work!
94707762
by vsahith
@ 2020-11-24 12:53
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agovsahith Apologies for using internal comments
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94707762
94680678
by vsahith
@ 2020-11-24 06:23
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agovsahith Edit made based on Private Maxar imagery
93522104
by vsahith
@ 2020-11-04 07:14
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agovsahith Modified Highway tag
79142929
by vsahith
@ 2020-01-03 06:14
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoskquinn
♦812
Please double check which way each side goes the next time you do this. (The US drives on the right.)
2 ~ 5 years agovsahith Hi,

Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the addition of incorrect directions. Will ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn from you.

Regards,
vsahith.
91764933
by vsahith
@ 2020-09-30 11:23
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoskquinn
♦812
For future reference, these should actually be highway=motorway_link. I have already fixed this one.
2 ~ 5 years agovsahith Hi,
Thanks for reviewing and correcting the edit. Will ensure not to repeat such mistake. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
vsahith.
91191137
by vsahith
@ 2020-09-20 23:56
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agovsahith split the road into dual carriageway as per Private Maxar imagery.
85385705
by vsahith
@ 2020-05-18 13:00
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agoBaloo Uriza
♦2,404
That median was recently removed.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85385705
2 ~ 5 years agovsahith Hi Uriza,
Thanks for your response and notifying me on this issue. Apologies that I missed to check on the deep history before editing. I've referred to Bing Imagery 2019 to edit and assumed it to be recent. I've reverted my changeset under #85420739
Looking forward to learning from you....
84697070
by vsahith
@ 2020-05-05 12:53
~ 5 years ago
1 ~ 5 years agochachafish
♦462
Hello. The relation you created in Colorado appears as an error in OSM Inspector. What is the purpose of this large relation? It seems to have no tags. You can see the error message here: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=-104.84930&lat=39.88559&zoom=13&overlays=nodes...
2 ~ 5 years agovsahith Thanks for looking into my edits, I didn't intentionally created this relation, this could have happened due to glitch with OSM. Thanks for bringing this to my notice, I've made the corrections under changeset #84760208
Regards ,
vsahith.
83460491
by vsahith
@ 2020-04-13 08:20
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoRecHeller23
♦1
Hi
81858678
by vsahith
@ 2020-03-06 08:31
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agoBaloo Uriza
♦2,404
What gives? Have you recently been on this road? It's still very much under construction and OklaDOT is still asking people to avoid it.
2 ~ 6 years agoBaloo Uriza
♦2,404
This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82184305 where the changeset comment is: Still under construction.
3 ~ 6 years agovsahith Hi Baloo,

Apologies for the incorrect edit. I missed to check the construction tag and have edited the road according to the available imagery. Thanks for reverting the changeset.

Regards,
vsahith.
78195070
by vsahith
@ 2019-12-10 08:51
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agomueschel
♦7,043
Hi,
is it true that this short piece of road suddenly got 5 'tiger:zip' tags or was this a mistake?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/754199423
2 ~ 6 years agovsahith Hi,

We only re-modeled road into dual carriageway due to the presence of physical median,(https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/325016166) please refer to this link which clearly shows these tags were added 5 years ago by another user.

Thanks,
vsahith.
3 ~ 6 years agomueschel
♦7,043
I refer to
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/754199423
This way was created by you. Having five zips on a few dozen meter of road just doesn't make sense. It might be correct for the original, mile-long street but not for this short piece.
4 ~ 6 years agovsahith Hi,

Thanks for reviewing my edit. While remodeling road into dual carriageway I created twin segment with same tags. Please refer to this link https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78195070/. Considering your suggestion, I have deleted additional tiger_zip tags here(please refer to this changeset ...
75827655
by vsahith
@ 2019-10-17 10:34
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agouser_5359
♦20,548
Hello! Please check the following ways
https://osm.org/way/735475537 unknown key lanes:
https://osm.org/way/735475537 unknown key turn:lanes:
https://osm.org/way/735475538 unknown key turn:lanes:
https://osm.org/way/735475540 unknown key lanes:
https://osm.org/way/735475543 unknown key lanes:
...
2 ~ 6 years agovsahith Hi,

Previously road was bi-directional, in the process of converting it into dual carriageway, I mistakenly left the semi-colons. Apologies for the error, I will rectify it ASAP.

Regards,
Sahith.
3 ~ 6 years agouser_5359
♦20,548
I am pleased to see that they are now partially using JOSM instead of ID. May I ask which check routines are used? We can discuss details at osm-edit-escalations@amazon.com who already know my private email address.
4 ~ 6 years agouser_5359
♦20,548
Please see also the other ways with the same error type https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/NeZ.
5 ~ 6 years agovsahith Hi

I will make the necessary corrections. Apologies and thanks again.

regard,
sahith
75835122
by vsahith
@ 2019-10-17 12:19
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agouser_5359
♦20,548
Hello! Why did you cut the key on way https://www.osm.org/way/399962989 (now turn:lanes:)?
2 ~ 6 years agovsahith Hi,

Previously road was bi-directional, in the process of converting it into dual carriageway, I mistakenly left the semi-colons. Apologies for the error, I will rectify it ASAP.

Regards,
Sahith.
75841020
by vsahith
@ 2019-10-17 13:31
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agouser_5359
♦20,548
Hello, why did you cut the keys on https://www.osm.org/way/532909980 (now access:) and https://www.osm.org/way/428092626 (now access:lanes:)?
2 ~ 6 years agovsahith Hi,

Previously road was bi-directional, in the process of converting it into dual carriageway, I mistakenly left the semi-colons. Apologies for the error, I will rectify it ASAP.

Regards,
Sahith.
75841461
by vsahith
@ 2019-10-17 13:36
~ 6 years ago
1 ~ 6 years agouser_5359
♦20,548
Hello! Why Did you change the key access:lanes:forward to access:lanes: on way https://www.osm.org/way/428092615?
2 ~ 6 years agovsahith Hi,

Previously road was bi-directional, in the process of converting it into dual carriageway, I mistakenly left the semi-colons. Apologies for the error, I will rectify it ASAP.

Regards,
Sahith.
65469846
by vsahith
@ 2018-12-14 11:36
~ 7 years ago
1 ~ 7 years agoGlassman
♦5,828
TIP: Capitalize Street Names. I fixed cedar spring drive.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65469846
2 ~ 7 years agovsahith Hi Glassman,

Thanks a lot for your support and tips. It is motivating and helpful for a new editor like me.
Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. Always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Vsahith