| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62868509 by vvrddy @ 2018-09-24 06:12 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | oba510 ♦274 | Since the street is only temporarily closed for construction you could have changed it to highway=construction instead of deleting it outright. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | vvrddy | Hi oba510, Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Its a misake from my end. Shouldn't have deleted the road. Thanks for reverting the changes. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community.Regards,vvrddy | |
| 67100214 by vvrddy @ 2019-02-11 13:21 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Baloo Uriza ♦2,404 | motor_vehicle=yes on this type of way is already default. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67100214 |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Hi Paul,Thanks for looking into this edit. We are coming across two different types of track roads where some roads are in good shape to route motor-vehicles and the other roads are not. To overcome this issue we looked into OSM wiki and identified it is better to add motor_vehicle=yes to certai... | |
| 67100033 by vvrddy @ 2019-02-11 13:15 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Baloo Uriza ♦2,404 | "unclassified" looks more accurate. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67100033 |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Hi Paul,Thanks for looking into this edit and fixing it. Since there are couple of houses associated with this road we changed it into a residential road. But in the larger context I believe unclassified is more accurate. Going forward we will keep this in mind.Let us know if there are any o... | |
| 65543980 by vvrddy @ 2018-12-17 09:54 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Surely some of these are parking aisles |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Hi NDM,Again thanks for looking into our edits. I totally agree to your point on some of the roads being parking_aisles in this changeset. From our previous editing experience we noticed a bit of disconnect on judging a parking_aisel. Just to make sure wrong information is not added to OSM, we a... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Thanks for helping to improve OpenStreetmap here in Bristol -- please ensure all edits are accurate and based on up to date information.Best regards,NeilP.S.This appears to be "organised editting" can you indicate the hashtag you are using and the wiki page you have set up, as ... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | yes Neil, we are improving OSM data to improve delivery programs of Amazon. You can find more information of our team from the following wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_LogisticsLet us know if there any recommendations or suggestions that can improve our mapping process.Rega... | |
| 65542846 by vvrddy @ 2018-12-17 09:06 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Are you sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655566640 is a loop? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | jguthula ♦65 | Hi NDM,Thanks for looking into our edits. Can I know what you meant by a loop in this case? Do you mean to split the road? From the Satellite imagery it looks like the complete segment belongs to one entity.Do let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | ndm ♦889 | Checked Bing Streetside - looks more plausible than satellite imagery alone. |