| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 166581088 by wireguy @ 2025-05-21 18:06 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | wireguy | odd, josm didn't prompt for comment... so here it is:buildings, addresses, pools, and tennis courts in Wendover Drive area of Princeton |
| 162799473 by wireguy @ 2025-02-21 23:20 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | wireguy | detailed info https://phillyyimby.com/2023/12/construction-complete-at-620-moore-street-in-wharton-south-philadelphia.html |
| 162008909 by wireguy @ 2025-02-01 12:31 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mark Dominus ♦4 | "Needs updating" how? I live right near here, and would be glad to go by and take a look if that helps. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | wireguy | The outline for the college seems to need updating. Looks like it includes a garage/mechanic next door. Also, some buildings may be vacant. thx. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Mark Dominus ♦4 | That CCP address include car maintenance as part of its curriculum and has a garage on-site, so it's quite possible that it's correct. I can go by and take a look to be sure. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Mark Dominus ♦4 | I drove past here an hour ago.This is actually two buildings and a parking lot. I separated the buildings. The northwest building is divided into two spaces, the north half is vacant and the south half is the Speedy Lube. There seemed to be two separate ways for the CCP boundary; I delete... | |
| 161173551 by wireguy @ 2025-01-09 15:07 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Stretch Longfellow ♦99 | Whoops; thanks! |
| 158544506 by wireguy @ 2024-10-30 14:30 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | wireguy | https://www.ocfrealty.com/naked-philly/%25neighborhood%25/the-mystery-of-york-avenue-part-1/https://www.ocfrealty.com/naked-philly/%25neighborhood%25/the-mystery-of-york-avenue-part-2/addresses need to be surveyed. are they now 4th Street? |
| 105382662 by wireguy @ 2021-05-26 22:53 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | HubMiner ♦271 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8770461400/historyI moved opening_hours to description. opening_hours need to show ranges. Need to resurvey OH. |
| 146555167 by wireguy @ 2024-01-22 14:11 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | George McMann ♦4 | Thanks for correcting my error. |
| 146527202 by wireguy @ 2024-01-21 20:33 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | questfinder ♦10 | Thanks for the update. I cannot outline a shape to accommodate the address tag; if the address tag is outside of the building shape, the address tag should be dragged into the proper location, not the other way. |
| 146511776 by wireguy @ 2024-01-21 13:00 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ZeLonewolf ♦576 | Thanks! |
| 129965290 by wireguy @ 2022-12-11 14:55 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | watmildon ♦292 | Some of the building footprints here had some small bad geometry. They do seem to be caught by the JOSM validator so just be on the lookout.I also suspect that the chunk of buildings with housenumber 12021 may need specific of different address info. If that's the case I've been leavin... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | watmildon ♦292 | Oh, here's the small fix I made to the building geometry here. In case that is helpful to see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131218810#map=19/40.12251/-75.01550 | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | wireguy | Watmildon, thanks for making the corrections. It's odd. I run the validator multiple times while I'm making the changes, and fix many issues. There are several times that it misses spikey buildings or small overlaps. I've seen a few MR spikey building updates fixing things. T... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | watmildon ♦292 | Sometimes to tools are inscrutable ha. When I did the Indianapolis address import, if the address were somewhat suspicious, I would leave addresses off the buildings entirely and place an address node near the "middle" of the building group with the one address. My hope was this would ... | |
| 129709705 by wireguy @ 2022-12-04 16:03 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | BPTT ♦91 | Cheers, thanks for the help. These were some of my first, while I was still learning. Maybe I shouldn't map after midnight! |
| 126199069 by wireguy @ 2022-09-14 21:47 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Raphaelkaart ♦35 | Good evening!Thanks for correcting this mapping of buildings in the city of Dom Inocêncio. |
| 121567322 by wireguy @ 2022-05-27 10:06 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Fred73000 ♦223 | Hi,be careful with roles : outer is only for ways, for nodes you have the choice between admin_centre and label, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundaryI fixed it.Best regards |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | wireguy | must have mis-clicked. thanks for fixing. | |
| 118975917 by wireguy @ 2022-03-27 10:39 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ElliottPlack ♦934 | Thanks. This relation is growing a bit unwieldy |
| 118979727 by wireguy @ 2022-03-27 12:51 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | wireguy | #2022032710000091reverted 118846474118846480118846503118846518118846539118846552118846567118846570118846592118846602118865576118865609118865627118865642118865651118865679 |
| 111601975 by wireguy @ 2021-09-23 15:33 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | JeroenHoek ♦716 | Hello,In Taginfo the tag kerb=lower drew my attention. It looks like this tag-value is used mostly (or only) by you:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/kerb#valuesCould this be a misspelling of kerb=lowered? Are there data consumers that specifically expect kerb=lower? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | wireguy | Yep, seems like a typo. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | JeroenHoek ♦716 | Thanks.I've documented it as such on the wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb#Possible_tagging_mistakesYou sure mapped a lot of kerbs! Nice. | |
| 117309212 by wireguy @ 2022-02-12 04:08 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ftcat ♦211 | Hi Wire Guy,Suggest you use MAXAR Premium imagery, it is more current, you will notice most these buildings no longer exist. They tend to be temporary anyway as it is a flood plain and the 'buildings' are built by fishermen when the water levels drop then they move away when it rises a... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | wireguy | Ok, thanks for the info. I was mostly correcting the typo on the tag value. Removed. | |
| 114895358 by wireguy @ 2021-12-13 19:28 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | George McManus ♦7 | Hi wireguy,do beginners like https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Brent%20Haselhoff/history get money from AWS for their contribution? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | wireguy | Why would I know about him?I can tell you that I do not work for AWS, am not paid, just a volunteer.Why do you ask? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | George McManus ♦7 | Hi wireguy,I know that you are a volunteer, very productive along with it. Are these mappers AWS employees or is AWS sponsoring the Hackathon? | |
| 114383595 by wireguy @ 2021-11-30 03:02 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,686 | Hello,I appreciate you've spent time tidying up the stuff that was imported here, but I'm concerned that as we don't know the source of the original data, we have no way of knowing whether it is licence-compatible with OSM (all attempts at communicating with the original importer fa... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | wireguy | the house numbers are the same from mapwithai. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | wireguy | as for the footways, I think they just need to be continued across the blacktop driveways. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,686 | Re the licence, just to transfer some comments from Slack, so that everyone can read them.Someone mentioned https://github.com/facebookmicrosites/Open-Mapping-At-Facebook/wiki/Esri-ArcGIS-FAQ , and someone else mentioned https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/United_States_Addresses .https... | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | wireguy | surveyed area and verified address are correct, updated footways and added more in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114450748 | |
| 113055842 by wireguy @ 2021-10-27 21:00 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ljb_nj ♦25 | Thanks for fixing this! I've been trying to figure out what was wrong with the updated boundary relation for a few days now. It queried OK but would not render on the default map layer. I guess that weird area with the 2 touching regions was the problem. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | wireguy | YW. It's probably easier to fix with josm. Let me know if there are any others you see that need fixing. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | ljb_nj ♦25 | It looks like you slightly offset 2 parts of the boundary to fix it. Were they actually overlapping, or was just touching enough to break it? I mapped it as 2 separate areas because one is restricted access. I meant to have them touch but not overlap. I would like to know what I did wrong, for fut... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | wireguy | The 2 outers were overlapping. Outers can't overlap or touch in more than one point. | |
| 105928420 by wireguy @ 2021-06-06 18:25 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Frans S ♦10,455 | Hello. Thanks for mapping here.A rather difficult job due to the bad imageryBest is to check the Bing imagery as well to get a better view about the building in this dense area.Best regards |
| 102335691 by wireguy @ 2021-04-05 12:54 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | akadouri ♦62 | Hey, are you sure this crosswalk is possible? Looks like there's a fence there from bing streetside but that could be outdated. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/926219270 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | wireguy | you are correct. verified with https://www.nycpedramps.info/surveydirect link if you want to check: https://s3.amazonaws.com/nycdot_software/gis/Cyclomedia_Images/Ramps/112991.jpegchanged to path and added Kerb lowered. | |
| 96689473 by wireguy @ 2020-12-30 20:28 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | wireguy | Wrong comment... sorry. Buildings in Highlands nj near bridge |
| 83083995 by wireguy @ 2020-04-04 21:47 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ppjj ♦56 | Hi wireguy - Thanks for your work on the island. However, I have always seen the mapping of sidewalks as separate ways as not ideal. It complicates walking directions and crowds up the map. For example, look at the south side of Ocean Street on the bay side. The sidewalk just ends halfway down the b... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | ppjj ♦56 | One thing that would be worth keeping is the crossing nodes on streets though -- that is very useful to navigation! Otherwise, take a look at the discussion pages on the wiki for more info on what I'm talking about. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | wireguy | Notice that I didn't start in Holgate. I wasn't sure how I wanted to handle the patchwork of sidewalks. In a beach town people just use streets as walkways. For Beach Haven, I liked separate ways, so curb lower and tactile paving can be expressed where it exists. I'll pause... | |
| 70971393 by wireguy @ 2019-06-06 01:11 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | wireguy | comment wrong. just squaring house. |