Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
45701594 by Ronnie Nys @ 2017-01-31 23:45 | 1 | 2021-05-03 17:24 | Marcos_Itba_Kaart ♦149 | De conversiebeperking 6934486 is verbroken, kunt u dit oplossen? |
2 | 2021-05-03 19:20 | Ronnie Nys | Did you mean the "no_u_turn" restriction? I can delete it, i think it has no function anymore. | |
3 | 2021-05-03 23:33 | Marcos_Itba_Kaart ♦149 | Hi,only one of the restriction members has been deleted, the relation still exists as can be seen here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6934486 | |
88309790 by Ronnie Nys @ 2020-07-21 19:29 | 1 | 2020-07-23 06:39 | Joseph E ♦137 | Hello Ronnie.I noticed that you have added the tag "residential=irregular_settlement" to several areas in this part of Brazil. I am trying to learn how this tag is used by other mappers. What does this tag mean to you?Olá Ronnie.Percebi que você adicionou a tag "res... |
2 | 2020-07-23 13:45 | Ronnie Nys | Hello JosephRegular settlements are characterized by formal planning and regularly spaced and arranged houses and roads as part of large-scale urban planning. Irregular settlements, conversely, have an unplanned layout that includes narrower and irregular growth of roads and houses. Irregular sett... | |
3 | 2020-07-23 18:23 | Joseph E ♦137 | Thank you. So, you are able to determine this by looking at aerial imagery? It's not necessary to check whether or not the settlement was planned by the local government - but usually these irregular settlements are not planned or approved, right? | |
56917311 by Ronnie Nys @ 2018-03-05 22:16 | 1 | 2018-03-11 06:57 | escada ♦168 | Beste,blijkbaar hebt u een kleine fout gemaakt, de weg die hieronder aangeduid staat als 77618642 is een grens, geen "unclassified". Waarschijnlijk per abuis mee geselecteerd.Ik zal het aanpassennog een prettige zondag |
2 | 2018-03-11 21:30 | Ronnie Nys | Beste, bedankt om dit recht te zetten. Groeten | |
56443112 by Ronnie Nys @ 2018-02-17 15:36 | 1 | 2018-02-18 14:57 | wille ♦523 | Hi Roonie!The website you have added to the church seems to be wrong: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285592027 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56443112 |
2 | 2018-02-19 16:56 | Ronnie Nys | Hi Wille, thanks for your info. I changed de website in a more concrete adres. | |
3 | 2018-02-19 17:57 | wille ♦523 | Thanks, but now you deleted the wikidata tag that was correct. Could you fix it? | |
4 | 2018-02-20 00:57 | Ronnie Nys | Ok Wille, i entered the wikidata tag again. Thanks for the info. | |
45725743 by Ronnie Nys @ 2017-02-01 19:53 | 1 | 2017-02-14 13:32 | naoliv ♦1,783 | Ronnie, most of the time it's not necessary to create "no_u_turn" restrictions here in Brazil when the "from" and "to" way are the same.See https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527 |
2 | 2017-02-19 11:09 | Ronnie Nys | Ok thanks, i will not make this "no u turn" restrictions for the future. | |
45904530 by Ronnie Nys @ 2017-02-08 04:22 | 1 | 2017-02-09 07:21 | poornibadrinath ♦176 | Hi Ronnie Nys, This particular highway has both motorway tag and primary tags. Several parts of this highway is on OSM since 2011 and several others are newly drawn by you. Is there a reason of such edits and inconsistent tags? Please make it all consistent to one tag, either motorway or primary.... |
2 | 2017-02-09 13:34 | Ronnie Nys | HiCurrently this motorway has a reform, from one to dual lanes on both sides , more like a motorway. Today i made changes as you asked.RegardsRonnie Nys | |
27853478 by Ronnie Nys @ 2015-01-02 01:53 | 1 | 2016-10-13 14:48 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | Is this complete? Strava GPS traces suggest it is.There are also Strava user error reports:Temos um circuito muito bom neste local e não podemos marcar como rota. Aguardo ajuda. |
2 | 2016-10-13 21:05 | Ronnie Nys | The Google satellite images are very recent (2016) and show that these new roads are already in use. When zooming in on the following link you can see the details.https://www.google.be/maps/@-12.7086332,-38.3050097,1191m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=nl | |
3 | 2016-10-14 01:11 | CloCkWeRX ♦343 | Thanks, I've updated it based on the GPS traces |