iMarbot participated in the following changeset discussionsiMarbot participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74984667 by MacLondon @ 2019-09-27 00:14 | 1 | 2019-10-13 13:54 | iMarbot | Where is it documented as a "roundel"? Did you even read the officially published documents I've linked multiple times which clearly call it a roundabout. |
| 2 | 2019-10-13 23:11 | MacLondon ♦215 | Hi. 'Roundels' are clearly documented in the official https://new.enfield.gov.uk/services/improving-enfield/neighbourhood-regeneration-information-ponders-end-high-street-new-junction-faqs.pdf:"Generally these suggest that the junction is operating as anticipated,with drivers an... | |
| 72749328 by iMarbot @ 2019-07-28 23:58 | 1 | 2019-07-28 23:58 | iMarbot | Details here: http://cycleenfield.co.uk/construction/a1010north/ |
| 65858111 by MacLondon @ 2018-12-29 05:02 | 1 | 2019-02-04 23:57 | iMarbot | They weren't mini miniroundabouts to begin with, it was just normal plain old junctions. I just didn't have the data to be able to draw the new layout accurately at the time. |
| 48575309 by woodpeck_repair @ 2017-05-10 21:44 | 1 | 2017-05-10 21:45 | iMarbot | thanks |
| 48534979 by thomaswest7891 @ 2017-05-09 15:23 Active block | 1 | 2017-05-10 21:41 | iMarbot | .... |
| 2 | 2017-05-10 21:45 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48575309 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism | |
| 48242494 by thomaswest7891 @ 2017-04-28 23:30 Active block | 1 | 2017-04-29 07:19 | pitscheplatsch ♦5,393 | Hi thomaswest7891, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting so many well mepped objects in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48242494 |
| 2 | 2017-04-29 16:29 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48260079 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism | |
| 3 | 2017-04-29 16:53 | iMarbot | They're still at it I see... | |
| 48010799 by woodpeck_repair @ 2017-04-21 17:55 | 1 | 2017-04-21 18:45 | iMarbot | Thanks, hopefully it survives this time |
| 48005343 by thomaswest7891 @ 2017-04-21 14:37 Active block | 1 | 2017-04-21 16:38 | iMarbot | http://www.longbeach.gov/park/park-and-facilities/directory/marina-green/ |
| 2 | 2017-04-21 17:55 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48010799 where the changeset comment is: revert deletion of a park mistaken for a fictional pokemon attractor | |
| 3 | 2017-04-29 16:29 | woodpeck_repair ♦33,903 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48260079 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism | |
| 47976966 by Luis36995 @ 2017-04-20 16:16 | 1 | 2017-04-20 20:32 | iMarbot | Good luck keeping this park here. Someone keeps deleting it |
| 47937551 by Curt Decker @ 2017-04-19 12:37 | 1 | 2017-04-19 15:18 | iMarbot | Stop deleting real features |
| 47766289 by Curt Decker @ 2017-04-14 05:41 | 1 | 2017-04-14 17:36 | rgt ♦2 | there are multiple references to this being a park on the internet so actually it is |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 22:43 | iMarbot | @rgt they are a malicious account. Look at their change history. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-19 15:45 | woodpeck ♦2,425 | Curt, could you explain why you believe this is not a park. I found this on the web http://www.longbeach.gov/park/park-and-facilities/directory/marina-green/ which seems to say that at leas the city of Long Beach believes it is a park. | |
| 45531379 by iMarbot @ 2017-01-26 21:50 | 1 | 2017-01-26 21:51 | iMarbot | Reverted Changeset: 45244443 |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 21:59 | iMarbot | Some proof it exists: http://imgur.com/sFSB3bf | |
| 45244443 by madtruc @ 2017-01-17 14:31 | 1 | 2017-01-17 17:26 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the footway. I can see the way on the aerial images of BING! |
| 2 | 2017-01-26 21:09 | iMarbot | Not again... We had someone delete these before too... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-26 21:12 | user_5359 ♦19,375 | Can I help? Should I revert this changeset? | |
| 4 | 2017-01-26 21:52 | iMarbot | Didn't expect someone to reply this fast, already reverted it. Thanks anyway! | |
| 5 | 2017-01-26 21:58 | iMarbot | Some proof it exists: http://imgur.com/sFSB3bf | |
| 44612908 by DavidKewley @ 2016-12-23 06:36 | 1 | 2016-12-23 18:21 | iMarbot | I already re-crated the path and re-did the whole park and added all its feature, so this revert was not needed. There is a now an overlapping path, so I will delete the original. |
| 2 | 2016-12-23 18:59 | DavidKewley ♦195 | Oops, sorry about that. Thank you for re-doing the park and undoing my revert! | |
| 44603197 by Curt Decker @ 2016-12-22 21:49 | 1 | 2016-12-23 01:50 | DavidKewley ♦195 | Hi Curt, thank you for helping improve OpenStreetMap! You write that the object you deleted is not a path. I'm curious what it is? I do not know this park, but from aerial imagery, it looks like the object you deleted is a dirt area of uniform width around the entire park, and I would have gues... |
| 2 | 2016-12-23 04:01 | iMarbot | This is indeed a gravel-based path that goes around the edge of the park and should not have been deleted. | |
| 3 | 2016-12-23 06:38 | DavidKewley ♦195 | Since two users (shinewend and iMarbot) say this path exists, and it appears to exist in aerial imagery, and one user says it's not a path (Curt Decker), I've gone ahead and reverted this deletion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44612908. Curt, feel free to respond explaining your ... |