| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54902958 by Moretonmill | 1 | 2017-12-25 20:56:21 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, the name field should only be used for actual names. Information like this should be put in a description or note field.Cheers Phil |
| 54369549 by Moretonmill | 1 | 2017-12-13 10:29:42 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi in this changeset way 544794534 has been tagged as highway=footway, access=no, foot=permissive and name=Forestry access track. I have moved the name to the description tag, but can you confirm whether this would be better tagged as highway=track?Thanks,Mike |
| 2 | 2017-12-13 11:16:03 UTC | Moretonmill | Hi Mike, it was created as a forestry access track but it’s now invaded with birch and pine and there’s only a narrow footpath left. Yours, Eddie | |
| 54368396 by Moretonmill | 1 | 2017-12-06 12:45:11 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, what is the source of this bridleway. It seems highly unlikely given the current ownership.Cheers Phil |
| 2 | 2017-12-06 17:36:27 UTC | Moretonmill | Dear Phil,I know what you mean. What with the generous use of barbed wire, the illegal gates and the threatening signs (shooting!), they seem to be trying to discourage walkers.However there's a planning sign for a bridle way on the gate post at O/S Grid 567277. I photographed it, but can't fi... | |
| 53561126 by Moretonmill | 1 | 2017-11-07 18:30:26 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this should be mapped as amenity=parking. Its name isn't CAR PARK.Cheers Phil |