5 changesets created by Moretonmill have been discussed with 2 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
55296972
by Moretonmill
@ 2018-01-09 15:59
12019-10-10 11:59trigpoint
♦2,373
Hi
I have changed these to public footpaths as they have been dedicated as footpaths on the basis it is a simpler process.

It is likely that the bridleway people will now apply for them to be upgraded as bridleways, so will monitor events.

Cheers Phil
54902958
by Moretonmill
@ 2017-12-25 09:42
12017-12-25 20:56trigpoint
♦2,373
Hi, the name field should only be used for actual names. Information like this should be put in a description or note field.

Cheers Phil
54369549
by Moretonmill
@ 2017-12-05 15:34
12017-12-13 10:29Mike Baggaley
♦630
Hi in this changeset way 544794534 has been tagged as highway=footway, access=no, foot=permissive and name=Forestry access track. I have moved the name to the description tag, but can you confirm whether this would be better tagged as highway=track?

Thanks,
Mike
22017-12-13 11:16Moretonmill Hi Mike, it was created as a forestry access track but it’s now invaded with birch and pine and there’s only a narrow footpath left. Yours, Eddie
54368396
by Moretonmill
@ 2017-12-05 15:08
12017-12-06 12:45trigpoint
♦2,373
Hi, what is the source of this bridleway. It seems highly unlikely given the current ownership.

Cheers Phil
22017-12-06 17:36Moretonmill Dear Phil,
I know what you mean. What with the generous use of barbed wire, the illegal gates and the threatening signs (shooting!), they seem to be trying to discourage walkers.
However there's a planning sign for a bridle way on the gate post at O/S Grid 567277. I photographed it, but can...
53561126
by Moretonmill
@ 2017-11-06 17:48
12017-11-07 18:30trigpoint
♦2,373
Hi, this should be mapped as amenity=parking. Its name isn't CAR PARK.

Cheers Phil