2 changesets created by Bobby444 have been discussed with 3 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
59849270
by Bobby444
@ 2018-06-14 15:53
12018-06-19 14:27iccaldwell
♦24
When you added the new tenant of the shop you did not notice there was already a node there, with the shop tagged as vacant. I have mergeD the two nodes as there was address information on the original node.
58931809
by Bobby444
@ 2018-05-13 19:03
12018-05-14 09:02mueschel
♦6,575
Hi Bobby,

in your edits, I saw several tags like "bobby444:schema" - could you explain what it means? It's very uncommon to put ones username in a tag.

And: the tags like "pattern_saturday:interval" are not used in any other place.
The usual key for this is "inte...
22018-05-14 09:33Bobby444 The bobby444:schema is a private notation for me until I can get things stabilised. It is part of my nascent system for tagging bus services sensibly. When I've decided how it is going to work, I'll submit it as a proposal for people to vote on. I used my own username so as to avoid confli...
32018-05-14 10:20mueschel
♦6,575
Alright, work in progress is always good.
I don't really like the idea to have so much information in the key. This mostly ends in a huge mess of subkeys that no tool can parse easily.
Did you try to use the syntax used in :conditional tags? That would be the perfect way to tag arbitrary ti...
42018-05-14 11:06Bobby444 Yes, it's ugly, and I tried to explain what I was up against on the talk:buses page, but my edits got lost somehow.

A huge mess of subkeys is, as you say, a bad idea.

I'm not familiar with this conditional syntax that you mention. Is it documented anywhere ?

OSM doesn't seem ...
52018-05-14 11:08Bobby444 If you can provide me a link to the :conditional stuff, I'll try and rework my relations to use that, then I won't need to have 'my own' schema.