Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
147561013 by mbe57 @ 2024-02-17 08:51 | 1 | 2024-02-18 08:28 | mavl ♦76,070 | Hello. I was in this place and I did not see this peak. What your source, please? |
2 | 2024-02-19 12:10 | mbe57 | TXs for coming back re. this "peak".I am preparing a new release of the OAM world maps and - after 6 years from the initial peak selection and rendering - revisit this topic. While in the Urals, Pamir, etc. etc. you have dramatic peaks, there is nothing like that in huge areas of Russia ... | |
3 | 2024-02-19 12:28 | mbe57 | PS: the DEM is the Copernicus GLO-30 one. | |
146818955 by mbe57 @ 2024-01-29 12:08 | 1 | 2024-01-30 00:57 | ❤️🔥 ♦367 | Hey, what source are you using for elevation? According to the background imagery "LINZ NZ Topo50 Gridless Maps", the elevation is 152 metres. LINZ is the source used for almost all elevations in NZa second source also says "over 148 metres": https://mustdonewzealand.co.nz/to... |
2 | 2024-01-30 13:11 | mbe57 | Sorry, a mistake of mine, will revert the change.Background: after 5 years I'm re-building the rendering of peaks depending on their isolations for the world maps at openandromaps.org. Back then I was shocked to find the highest peak at the Philippines, at 28,000+ and tons of elevations in fe... | |
3 | 2024-02-02 09:49 | ❤️🔥 ♦367 | no problem, thanks for doing this validation work :) | |
146713878 by mbe57 @ 2024-01-26 15:20 | 1 | 2024-01-27 17:22 | willkmis ♦173 | Hello,Thanks for going through these mistagged elevations (I'm guessing you're prompted in part by https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/announcement-openlandcovermap/108392?). I agree that this and others that you're editing are almost certainly unit errors where the ele=* tag cont... |
2 | 2024-01-27 20:53 | mbe57 | Hello Will,I will not disregard, and I hear you.So, for future edits I will adapt the wording.What do you think about this: "ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation meter field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc... | |
3 | 2024-01-28 00:05 | willkmis ♦173 | No worries! I don't know if pollute is the word I would choose, as it again seems a bit strong and negative (imagine if you were a new mapper and someone says that adding a perfectly true elevation you saw on a sign during your hike to the database was polluting OSM!). So I don't even thin... | |
4 | 2024-01-28 11:50 | mbe57 | Next try :-)"ele wrong by a factor of about 3, which hints at feet figures put into the OSM elevation field that requires meter values. Feet figures obviously create havoc in the OSM data."Thank you also for the additional link; interesting discussion, but not a magic wand either. I... | |
5 | 2024-01-28 18:49 | willkmis ♦173 | Yeah that seems much less prone to misinterpretation! Thanks for engaging with my input :) | |
6 | 2024-01-28 19:13 | mbe57 | You're welcome. | |
121234998 by mbe57 @ 2022-05-20 10:13 | 1 | 2022-05-22 21:28 | 4004 ♦1,887 | these are all oil wells/exploration sites. No idea where the power plant tags came from, don't think any of these landuses are generating any electricity |
84977531 by mbe57 @ 2020-05-10 16:11 | 1 | 2020-05-15 21:49 | wurzelast ♦1,560 | statt löschen besser mit disused: markierenhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused: --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84977531 |
55098965 by mbe57 @ 2018-01-02 12:12 | 1 | 2019-10-03 14:15 | Jojo4u ♦265 | I reverted this. Please discuss on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:capital before making changes. |
55636691 by mbe57 @ 2018-01-21 20:00 | 1 | 2019-08-31 15:19 | mariotomo ♦1,895 | hi. I'm reviewing stuff put in the database by ArielRod, and I notice your edit, which makes me wonder what's your data source. cheers and be welcome to the Telegram group for OSM Panama. |
2 | 2019-09-02 09:57 | mbe57 | Hi, I am generating world overview maps for OpenAndroMaps that also include significant peaks (high isolation and prominance). For such I am analyzing ALL peaks in OSM by calculating the ration between ele in OSM and SRTM. And for the most brutal anomalies I have a "manual" look, and corre... | |
68808511 by mbe57 @ 2019-04-02 18:55 | 1 | 2019-04-10 19:51 | Øukasz ♦163 | Hi mbe57. Can you let me know please what's the source of your data to set Longana as municipality? Thanks |
2 | 2019-04-10 20:35 | mbe57 | Wikipedia is not very clear here. So, if somebody with local knowledge can take care this is very appreciated.My interest are local province capitals. Being well aware, that "province" means different things in different places; sometimes simply use another term for it. | |
3 | 2019-04-14 19:45 | Øukasz ♦163 | Glad to be of help then:Longana is not a municipality, town, villageb, or even a populated place. It is a general highland area of East Ambae. The capital of the Penama province has been located in Saratamata, and this is where all the offices are still located. In November 2018 however the ... | |
4 | 2019-04-16 05:23 | mbe57 | For this country, province is clear, I know.Happy to substitute "municipality" by something more meaningful. What is the right "place" type then, pls ?But should not "capital" be removed, too ?And put to Saratamata? | |
5 | 2019-08-28 22:40 | Øukasz ♦163 | I would say place=region makes the most sense per the OSM wiki description | |
71354862 by mbe57 @ 2019-06-18 07:21 | 1 | 2019-06-18 08:45 | archie ♦1,304 | Du treibst dein Unwesen allso weiter. Der Tag admin_level ist fuer boundaries allso ways oder relations. Nicht fuer nodes! Hier ist er ueberfluessig, weil die Relation fuer Östergötland (county) (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/940675) schon Linköping als admin_centre beinnhalt... |
2 | 2019-06-18 09:01 | mbe57 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_levelZitat daraus: UsageThe admin_level=* values are also used for the capital=* and heritage=* tags. Besides administrative boundaries, the admin_level=* tag currently has very few usage on features tagged with government=*.Dein Capital "coun... | |
71286869 by mbe57 @ 2019-06-15 19:14 | 1 | 2019-06-15 19:42 | archie ♦1,304 | So, jetzt ist deine unnötige Arbeit futsch. JOSMs Fehlerbereinigung hat alle deine is_in* Tags gelöscht. Wozu der Aufwand veraltete Tags einzufuegen? |
2 | 2019-06-15 20:35 | mbe57 | Ich habe im Wiki die Definitionen nachgelesen. Außer, dass JOSM das tötet, ohne Begündung, ohne Hinweis auf Ersatz, habe ich nichts gefunden.Das "Rationale" ist immer noch gegeben. Und Nominatim mag ein Ersatz sein für gewisse OSM Webseiten Services, aber löst m... | |
3 | 2019-06-15 23:22 | archie ♦1,304 | Lies wiki richtig! "Wenn gute und flächendeckende Boundaries, Places und/oder Multipolygone vorhanden sind, ist dieser Tag überflüssig und soll nicht mehr verwendet werden! "Welche Untersuchungen hast du unternommen um festzustellen, dass es hier in Schweden keine "gu... | |
71287162 by mbe57 @ 2019-06-15 19:30 | 1 | 2019-06-15 19:35 | archie ♦1,304 | Was soll der Unsinn? is_in:contry usw sind veraltete Tags. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is%20in:country?uselang=sv |
69056688 by mbe57 @ 2019-04-09 18:05 | 1 | 2019-04-10 17:00 | Allison P ♦1,136 | The is_in tag is deprecated due to most countries having boundary polygons. I removed those tags for this reason. While I can't stop you from adding them back, I wanted to let you know. |
2 | 2019-04-10 20:37 | mbe57 | Well, the OSM database speaks differently. And in my work, I deal with nearly 200 countries ...is_in:countryDas Tag is_in wird verwendet, um anzugeben, in welchem Staat sich eine Stadt befindet.Filter:Kein FilterVergleichsliste (0 Einträge)XAPI JOSM Level0 Editor Overpass turbo\... | |
3 | 2019-04-10 20:50 | Allison P ♦1,136 | I understand that the tag is still used on hundreds of thousands of nodes and ways. There are likely some countries where is_in still has some use, but seeing as how the country, state, county, and city borders are already mapped, there is no need, mapping applications are able to determine those, m... | |
69007567 by mbe57 @ 2019-04-08 13:40 | 1 | 2019-04-08 21:43 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | Me and the Norwegian OSM community would appreciate if you could remove these is_in-tags. We spent some time removing them.The whole country and every county, city and municipality are multi-polygons so is_is is quite useless now. It just confused Nominatim |
2 | 2019-04-08 23:12 | mbe57 | Frederik, s there a proper query in your paradigm that gives all province capitals?I am dealing with world maps, and the chaos you spot on the way is incredible. "Islands" of "traditions", incomaptible, intransparent. And the worst of all were peaks with elevations in feet - wi... | |
69010434 by mbe57 @ 2019-04-08 14:51 | 1 | 2019-04-08 21:41 | FredrikLindseth ♦203 | I'm pretty sure this isn't in Norway ;-D |
2 | 2019-04-08 23:07 | mbe57 | You are SO right ! TXs a lot. | |
68828350 by mbe57 @ 2019-04-03 08:50 | 1 | 2019-04-06 14:35 | Nesim ♦50 | Please let's not change it again, it is the district of Antakya official records.http://www.antakya.gov.tr/tarih |
60610220 by mbe57 @ 2018-07-11 11:21 | 1 | 2018-07-14 16:16 | maraf24 ♦5,269 | What for? This is useless tag for cities.Administrative boundaries are used to determine country. |
2 | 2018-07-14 16:39 | mbe57 | This is a province capital, hence it makes sense to know the associated country. Maybe useless for you personally, not useless for others. | |
3 | 2018-07-14 16:50 | maraf24 ♦5,269 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in | |
60340099 by mbe57 @ 2018-07-02 08:26 | 1 | 2018-07-02 10:22 | dgitto ♦934 | fixed position and elevation (DTM & CTR) |
2 | 2018-07-02 11:06 | mbe57 | Grazie | |
54923297 by mbe57 @ 2017-12-26 08:18 | 1 | 2017-12-26 08:21 | mbe57 | comment wrong, in fact converted ft -> m |
54653384 by mbe57 @ 2017-12-15 13:28 | 1 | 2017-12-15 13:31 | mbe57 | Sorry, location was wrong, but elevation has a massive gap between Wikipedia and SRTM/OSM information |
54468124 by mbe57 @ 2017-12-08 19:34 | 1 | 2017-12-11 10:50 | amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️🌈 ♦363 | It looks like that value of 280m was added in 2010 by pf_irl ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/5155134 ), I've left a comment on that changeset. |