| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 169912580 by BeaconOSM @ 2025-08-03 15:55 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | BPTT ♦91 | Hi. Please be advised that the straight, parallel ways you draw as paths are actually firebreaks and should be tagged as barrier=trench. This is to keep people on designated paths to lessen the impact on the environment. I've retagged them for now, but in the future, please reach out if you hav... |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | BPTT ♦91 | I mean to say that the preset feature type is Trench but the tag is barrier=ditch, not barrier=trench. | |
| 166451641 by BeaconOSM @ 2025-05-18 23:18 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | quincylvania ♦84 | Hi BeaconOSM, just an FYI I had to revert this changeset since Skippack isn't an admin boundary, it's a census designated place. |
| 169424226 by BeaconOSM @ 2025-07-24 22:22 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | danieldegroot2 ♦705 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19385743Preferably simple polygons are added as area, not multipolygon, unless not otherwise possible, or prefered by the local community (which it is unlikely to be). --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... |
| 134551439 by BeaconOSM @ 2023-04-05 19:27 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | DUGA ♦551 | Junk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160031626/history/ removed. |
| 148609728 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:25 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete operator= tag here? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609728 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Misuse of operator tag | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | How is it misuse if it lists who's the operator? | |
| 148617097 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:51 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete this business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617097 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Research of the company shows that this pin was placed here by a bot/person for advertisement purposes and not does not reflect an actual entity address. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Please provide this supporting evidence that it doesn't exist here. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | https://www.brighterdaymh.com/locations/waterbury | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | + In person investigation; its just a Walmart. | |
| 148617237 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:58 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you completely delete this node rather than use lifecycle prefixes? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617237 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Research of the company shows that this pin was placed here by a bot/person for advertisement purposes and not does not reflect an actual entity address. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Even if this company didn't exist here, the address tags are valid and should've been left intact. | |
| 148617250 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:59 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this hotel? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617250 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Misuse of description tag | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | How is deleting every other tag of this hotel relates to correcting "Misuse of description tag"? | |
| 148609881 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:30 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete payment tags here? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609881 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Misuse of description tag for a business | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | How is deleting accurate payment tags fixes "Misuse of description tag for a business"? 🤨 | |
| 148617120 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:52 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete this valid building? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617120 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | The building was replaced | |
| 148617233 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:58 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617233 |
| 148617211 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you complete delete this node rather than fixing its tags? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617211 |
| 148617207 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617207 |
| 148617200 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617200 |
| 148617194 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:56 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617194 |
| 148617178 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:56 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags on this feature but didn't fix actually incorrect ones? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617178 |
| 148617154 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:54 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617154 |
| 148617146 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:54 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617146 |
| 148617131 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid description tag? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617131 |
| 148617103 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:51 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this building? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617103 |
| 148616957 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:43 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete this business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148616957 |
| 148616947 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:43 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148616947 |
| 148616918 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:41 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete this valid business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148616918 |
| 148616843 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:37 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148616843 |
| 148615382 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 22:26 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148615382 |
| 148615262 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 22:22 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete contact information from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148615262 |
| 148612830 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:55 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612830 |
| 148612755 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you not transfer VALID information into proper inscription tag?!There's NO advertisement in this node, please write accurate and meaningful changeset comments. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612... |
| 148612555 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:48 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid payment methods from this node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612555 |
| 148612545 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:48 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete this valid business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612545 |
| 148612537 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:48 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete this valid business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612537 |
| 148612474 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:46 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you completely delete a valid business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612474 |
| 148612443 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:46 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete an apparently valid INSCRIPTION from this statue?Why didn't you change the name of this tag instead of outright just deleting it? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612443 |
| 148612329 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:42 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you completely delete this node, instead of actually doing proper tag clean up and preserving at least address information?! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612329 |
| 148612318 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:42 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete legitimate description from this school? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612318 |
| 148612308 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:42 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete valid tags from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612308 |
| 148611923 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:33 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete name= tag from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148611923 |
| 148611859 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:31 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete this node of apparently legit business? And why did you do it without transferring address information? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148611859 |
| 148611828 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:30 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Instead of deleting the whole feature and then creating a new one, why didn't you just remove incorrect tags?!Why when you created a new building you didn't restore address tags?! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... |
| 148611303 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:16 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Here again, "Opens Summer 2024" is not a real feature name. Feature description must NOT be used as its name.If you want to encode when this station is planned to be operational you can use opening_date= tag as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date ... |
| 148610536 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:52 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | "Opens summer 2024" is an invalid feature name. Feature name must NOT be used as its description.We have opening_date= tag, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date to indicate a date when a feature finishes construction or activates. --- ... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Additionally, why did you create a multipolygon relation with just a single feature? 17342788 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148610536 | |
| 148609708 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:24 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Street name tag is invalid here.Why was it necessary merging this node with the building? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609708 |
| 148609691 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:23 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete description tag here? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609691 |
| 148608958 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:01 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete this biz POI?It seems to be there.Or at the very least, why did you not keep the address tags intact? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608958 |
| 148608935 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:01 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete all these legitimate tags?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:* --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608935 |
| 148608822 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 18:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | This is not a valid street name.Why did you just delete amenity= instead of fixing it? Now this POI has no primary category. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608822 |
| 148608649 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 18:51 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete description= tag here? This looks to be a perfectly legitimate, neutral tone description of the business.Also why did you delete nysgissam:nysaddresspointid tag? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608649 ... |
| 148605647 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 17:40 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Why did you delete nysgissam:nysaddresspointid tag here? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148605647 |
| 148605291 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 17:33 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Once again you deleted a legitimate biz poi... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148605291 |
| 148604974 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 17:26 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Hello.Why did you delete this apparently legitimate business?Valid biz listings on OSM is not advertisement... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148604974 |
| 148603659 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 16:52 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Hello.If you were cleaning up ads from the description tag, why did you delete all the biz-specific tags?And even more so, why did you delete all the address tags from this building?!This is borderline map vandalism! The deleted information MUST be restored! --- #REVI... |
| 148612396 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:44 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Hello.Why did you delete this law office tags? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612396 |
| 148608467 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 18:46 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Hello.Please do NOT delete nycdoitt:bin=* tags!They uniquely identify each building in NYC DOT's database which allows for metadata conflation and enrichment.If you don't know what a tag does, please do not delete it. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA P... |
| 148611903 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:32 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | jhaluska80 ♦93 | Kind of impressed you found that. I learned about the alt_name tag after making that change and forgot to update it. |
| 141439788 by BeaconOSM @ 2023-09-18 19:46 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Hello.Could you please elaborate on this edit? The latest satellite imagery shows that this is some sort of construction site or a staging area for one. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141439788 |
| 126224617 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-09-15 13:20 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Frans S ♦10,455 | Hello Again,This task is not validated as it should be done. Issues with crossed buildings and connected nodes not corrected as well as buildings not squared.Best regards |
| 126224505 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-09-15 13:17 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Frans S ♦10,455 | HelloA remark, I am a Sr validator and review validated tasks at random.You missed here a number of issuesNot all buildings squared. (22)Overlapping buildings, not solved.Untagged ways, issue with crossing.Please also solve issues which pops up when you want to upload your mappings.... |
| 124499173 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 22:22 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124500659 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-05 00:07 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124498937 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 22:06 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124500184 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 23:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124498105 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 21:25 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124499094 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 22:17 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124500476 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 23:53 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124498210 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 21:29 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124500525 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 23:56 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124499265 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 22:27 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦72,134 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 116436268 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-01-21 15:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mkarau ♦11 | Your Edits are incorrect. You used Aerial imagery, and I used the most up to date GPS traces that actually represent the new road patterns. Please Revert. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | mkarau ♦11 | Your Edits are incorrect. You used Aerial imagery, and I used the most up to date GPS traces that actually represent the new road patterns. Please Revert. | |
| 108714756 by BeaconOSM @ 2021-07-28 02:22 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Hello.Do you have some supporting information that there's a neighborhood named Ravel there?As far as I'm aware that area is referred to as Brooklyn Heights. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108714756 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | jmapb ♦420 | Chiming in -- never heard of this "Brooklyn Community Board Recognized Colloquial Neighborhood" -- what's your source? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,522 | Since I found nothing about this feature online and this user didn't respond in 4 days, I deleted that neighborhood. Perhaps their other changes should be reviewed as well. |