| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 188411505 (Comments: 4) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 42) | You can at least redraw it even if deleting it, which you should avoid as seen from the possibility of forgetting to do it commented 2026-09-04 09:10:05 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188411162 (Comments: 3) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 42) | Ok commented 2026-09-04 08:44:37 UTC by silveragestum ♦3 |
| 188447132 (Comments: 1) | bigmanbusman (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please stop creating non-existent `=crossing` commented 2026-09-03 07:52:15 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188420791 (Comments: 2) | flightwastaken (Discussed changesets: 1) | (You should only move them if they are positioned wrongly) commented 2026-09-03 07:50:36 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188346817 (Comments: 1) | clsunny (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please only remove the `name=` , not delete the entire `building=` commented 2026-09-01 07:59:34 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188333347 (Comments: 1) | clsunny (Discussed changesets: 2) | 1. Please only remove the `name=` if the names are wrong, not delete the `=bare_rock` 2. `name=` doesn't need to be official. It only needs to be commonly known. If it's not, it can be `loc_name=` etc. commented 2026-09-01 07:56:35 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188281740 (Comments: 1) | 旧加卷 (Discussed changesets: 15) | 电子版香港法例文件A207与内地流传的《中华人民共和国国务院令第221号》文本针对附件《中华人民共和国香港特别行政区行政区域界线文字表述》中“10号点”的描述存在差异，在此... commented 2026-08-31 04:08:46 UTC by 旧加卷 ♦94 |
| 188206162 (Comments: 4) | srkbrmx (Discussed changesets: 5) | The main purpose of this changeset was resolving the incorrect (foot=no / bicycle=no) restrictions that break real-world navigation. Feel free to refine the access hierarchy as you see fit. commented 2026-08-30 12:39:02 UTC by srkbrmx ♦1 |
| 188205038 (Comments: 1) | srkbrmx (Discussed changesets: 5) | Are you sure `emergency=yes` + `locked=yes` ? commented 2026-08-30 09:15:09 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188020401 (Comments: 2) | HK Bitcoin City (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am unable to verify the acceptance of Bitcoin. No Bitcoin sign on their website or social media. commented 2026-08-29 10:42:56 UTC by Comino ♦401 |
| 187973976 (Comments: 4) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 210) | The modifications focus on the Lau Fau Shan "eat fish" area. We know Bing and Mapbox have different imagery, generally in separate years. We see a consistent "carved" coastline from both sources. We also see there is extra ... commented 2026-08-29 10:04:30 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦209 |
| 187973771 (Comments: 3) | vectorial8192 (Discussed changesets: 210) | So far I see the market names are not formalized names. Dockyard area doesn't seem likely to have names. We could still use the proper "Lau Fau Shan" suburb node outside to address the whole neighbourhood. commented 2026-08-29 09:58:27 UTC by vectorial8192 ♦209 |
| 188090438 (Comments: 5) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 42) | Also from past problems with you, it's unclear whether you mean there's no longer any road here, or the alignment has changed. If it's the latter, you should be editing its shape, not deleting entirely. From the remaining short section... commented 2026-08-29 09:11:03 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 187529787 (Comments: 3) | HAL_Study (Discussed changesets: 1) | `=unclassified` means minor road, not non-identified roads commented 2026-08-29 08:51:25 UTC by Kovoschiz ♦3,022 |
| 188032738 (Comments: 1) | silveragestum (Discussed changesets: 42) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188184446 commented 2026-08-29 08:24:52 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |