| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 183228545 (Comments: 2) | phodgkin (Discussed changesets: 39) | Good spot - It was meant to be `name=Oak Tree`. Fixed! commented 2026-09-04 20:02:58 UTC by phodgkin ♦88 |
| 188529649 (Comments: 1) | Skinkos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and many thanks for spotting and removing that little bit of vandalism. commented 2026-09-04 19:31:11 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188529984 (Comments: 2) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 18) | Apologies, I do intend on doing so in the future. commented 2026-09-04 18:47:35 UTC by Aethonatic ♦81 |
| 188525553 (Comments: 1) | yasminehabra (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, your test mapping upload dragged Euston Road out of alignment. I've reverted the changes, so all is now OK. OSM is a live worldwide database from which maps are compiled. Please don'... commented 2026-09-04 16:38:23 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188525009 (Comments: 1) | PDMMDP (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I’ve seen a lot of edits like this from you recently. They look useful, but I’d like to double check your sources, as they need to be compatible with OSM’s licensing in order to be used on the map. Which street view servi... commented 2026-09-04 15:56:09 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 188473205 (Comments: 1) | sleet2412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't add 'Station' to the station's name. You've now made operator:website the same as nettwork:website. commented 2026-09-04 14:51:24 UTC by DaveF ♦1,683 |
| 141907183 (Comments: 1) | Kabads (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706074809/history is restaurant also disused? commented 2026-09-04 12:45:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187934915 (Comments: 1) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi, I agree that adding and correcting the postal city is helpful, I'm just not so sure that addr:county is. It's not really part of addresses any more since the abolition of postal counties some 30 years ago. Do you have a particular use c... commented 2026-09-04 11:50:53 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 181947488 (Comments: 2) | ohmanger (Discussed changesets: 28) | I agree they can over complicate things. I'll keep this in mind in the future. Thanks for the nudge and doing the work! commented 2026-09-04 10:19:30 UTC by ohmanger ♦48 |
| 188194002 (Comments: 2) | Guyroscope (Discussed changesets: 3) | I’m assuming it was accidental and have removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188516207, let me know if that’s not correct, thanks! commented 2026-09-04 09:40:38 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 188382558 (Comments: 4) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | What other uses of addr:county are there or could there be? We are not referring to is_in here, but a property of the address I don't seem to be able to see any thread in the forum yet commented 2026-09-04 08:58:43 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 184045120 (Comments: 3) | ClearCarbon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Brilliant thank you, yeah StreetComplete is brilliant but obvs a limited interface. Will do interpolation ways soon. commented 2026-09-04 08:39:00 UTC by fisherthewol ♦1 |
| 188508262 (Comments: 1) | Goodmayes Pharmacy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Address tweaked. commented 2026-09-04 07:13:54 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188492342 (Comments: 1) | Rafaella123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, you made many mistakes here, too many to list them all. Building-part tags removed, many school and building tags altered incorrectly, duplicated Battersea Park outline to state a few. I thin... commented 2026-09-04 07:08:16 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188499651 (Comments: 1) | On the Go J (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi - this appears to relate to a new housing estate off Hill Top Road which will need various survey data adding: roads, actual houses, construction area polygon. Do you need a hand? commented 2026-09-04 06:27:35 UTC by no details provided here ♦58 |
| 188406755 (Comments: 2) | Paul Berry (Discussed changesets: 60) | That's OK. When you want to use a postcode as a geolocator only, use postal_code. commented 2026-09-03 23:17:01 UTC by Paul Berry ♦143 |
| 183644742 (Comments: 2) | Yuliya_Petrash (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi rskedgel! Thank you for pointing this out and for checking the imagery! You're completely right — I missed the existing `highway=stop` tag on the node. I've separated the `highway=stop` from `highway=crossing` and updated the... commented 2026-09-03 18:44:10 UTC by Yuliya_Petrash ♦10 |
| 188489722 (Comments: 1) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 63) | Mapbox commented 2026-09-03 18:31:14 UTC by Alex_457 ♦83 |
| 183492368 (Comments: 3) | squeaker_andrus (Discussed changesets: 16) | We have no objection at all if you or the local community choose to revert or adjust any of the separate sidewalks from our changesets that impact pedestrian routing. Please check your inbox for the full email response! Best regards, squeak... commented 2026-09-03 18:23:27 UTC by squeaker_andrus ♦16 |
| 183011572 (Comments: 1) | Cesca Brint (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, This style of tagging for a crossing with an island has been deprecated for a while. For the crossing node, it should be: highway=crossing + crossing:island=yes And for the crossing way: highway=footway + footway=crossi... commented 2026-09-03 16:52:09 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188466932 (Comments: 2) | carloabayon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Bernard, thanks for your comment. This was intended to map locations in the UK where acro yoga jams are regularly held. I'll review the tagging in light of OSM guidelines. commented 2026-09-03 16:49:22 UTC by carloabayon ♦3 |
| 188466631 (Comments: 2) | carloabayon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Bernard, thanks for your comment. This was intended to map locations in the UK where acro yoga jams are regularly held. I'll review the tagging in light of OSM guidelines. commented 2026-09-03 16:48:58 UTC by carloabayon ♦3 |
| 188465060 (Comments: 2) | carloabayon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Bernard, thanks for your comment. This was intended to map locations in the UK where acro yoga jams are regularly held. I'll review the tagging in light of OSM guidelines. commented 2026-09-03 16:45:22 UTC by carloabayon ♦3 |
| 188382458 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hi, Can I ask why you are removing perfectly valid address data from multiple locations? I fundamentally disagree that addr:county is not part of an address. Have you discussed the mass edit with the community please? Thanks,<... commented 2026-09-03 16:34:49 UTC by James Derrick ♦90 |
| 188382903 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hi, Can I ask why you are removing perfectly valid address data from multiple locations? Have you discussed the mass edit with the community please? Thanks, James commented 2026-09-03 16:34:38 UTC by James Derrick ♦90 |
| 188382538 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Hi, Can I ask why you are removing perfectly valid address data from multiple locations? I fundamentally disagree that addr:county is not part of an address. Have you discussed the mass edit with the community please? Thanks,<... commented 2026-09-03 16:33:53 UTC by James Derrick ♦90 |
| 105507167 (Comments: 1) | mc85eu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496892 ? commented 2026-09-03 16:16:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 153089126 (Comments: 1) | caierith (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, do you have a source for the field names used here? A few of them don't seem to line up with the modern land parcels so I'm not sure how valid they are. Thanks commented 2026-09-03 16:00:13 UTC by ohmanger ♦48 |
| 187927048 (Comments: 1) | snackattack (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi snackattack, There is already a building on this spot. Are you able to add additional details to that building instead and remove this one you've added? commented 2026-09-03 15:43:42 UTC by Slartibartfast141 ♦2 |
| 172881895 (Comments: 1) | livmakesmaps (Discussed changesets: 5) | In this changeset, you changed two pelican crossings correctly tagged as crossing=traffic_signals + crossing:signals=yes to crossing=marked (removing the crossing:signals=* tag ). The UK's pelican, puffin, toucan and pegasus pedestrian cr... commented 2026-09-03 15:20:29 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188477319 (Comments: 1) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hold on, clearing up these conflicts... commented 2026-09-03 15:08:47 UTC by Aethonatic ♦81 |
| 128076661 (Comments: 1) | cjl6 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496893 ? commented 2026-09-03 15:04:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 117222320 (Comments: 1) | mc85eu (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496901 ? commented 2026-09-03 12:39:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188469541 (Comments: 1) | samjcorbin (Discussed changesets: 3) | See changeset comment here for further context: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177906899 commented 2026-09-03 12:38:33 UTC by samjcorbin ♦6 |
| 116758397 (Comments: 1) | ⇄ john paul jones & gringo (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496895 ? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 125583506 (Comments: 1) | Mal_B (Discussed changesets: 3) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5496850 ? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188467399 (Comments: 1) | Super Villain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. It’s a map which needs to be useful to everyone, so please refrain from adding personal notes/games to it, thanks. commented 2026-09-03 12:03:00 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 188466427 (Comments: 1) | carloabayon (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If there is no feature 'on the ground' here that any passerby can verify, then the meeting place should not be mapped to OSM. If its not a visible feature the node should be removed. Regards Berna... commented 2026-09-03 11:52:33 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188459772 (Comments: 3) | Figsontoast (Discussed changesets: 3) | Then it's a service road, access=private which means all access is private. Tags amended. commented 2026-09-03 11:42:29 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188453796 (Comments: 1) | Theydon Bois Pharmacy Epping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Address tweaked commented 2026-09-03 11:20:22 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188459443 (Comments: 1) | Figsontoast (Discussed changesets: 3) | Access beyond the gate is private. commented 2026-09-03 11:16:51 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188459479 (Comments: 1) | Figsontoast (Discussed changesets: 3) | All access beyond the gate is private commented 2026-09-03 11:16:12 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188461397 (Comments: 1) | Ethlered (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, you added this building on top of the existing building, duplicated building. Thus, I've reverted the changeset, adding your new info to the existing building outline. Regards Ber... commented 2026-09-03 10:51:48 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188138057 (Comments: 1) | tfoubert1 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour, ce changeset a brisé la continuité de plusieurs itinéraires pédestres qui passent par là. Je vais tenter la réparation. commented 2026-09-03 09:47:17 UTC by StC ♦518 |
| 163325455 (Comments: 1) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 156) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188398230 (Comments: 1) | thetornado76 (Discussed changesets: 161) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 172409270 (Comments: 1) | jordann6531 (Discussed changesets: 3) | When you added a separate sidewalk on the N side of Snow Hill ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1432619398 ), was there any particular reason why you drew it across, and mostly on the wrong side of, the kerb line which was already mapped? commented 2026-09-03 06:59:22 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188382407 (Comments: 1) | sixfoureight (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, your long path line Way: 1554311821 self-intersected several times with unconnected crossing points. I've corrected it; OK now. Regards Bernard. commented 2026-09-03 04:55:56 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188379037 (Comments: 1) | Cat_Mac (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, welcome to Open Street Map! I'd just like to draw your attention to some house numbers you've added. You have put them in "name", but there is a dedicated tag for house numbers which is "addr:housenumber". Just thou... commented 2026-09-02 20:29:07 UTC by Jack_Regan ♦3 |
| 141003009 (Comments: 3) | okwithmydecay (Discussed changesets: 40) | I am a bit surprised that arbour counts as a building or is this one more buildingy? commented 2026-09-02 20:23:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187810783 (Comments: 2) | lukepfarrar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I haven't passed again yet to check I have it correct. Will get a photo the next time I'm there. commented 2026-09-02 18:22:52 UTC by lukepfarrar ♦1 |
| 187716608 (Comments: 1) | Paul Scriven (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Paul, In this changeset you added the tag: * defibrillator:location="is there a defibrillator or just a bl ed kit?" to the amenity=defibrillator node at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14018174476 which you had pr... commented 2026-09-02 16:36:54 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦341 |
| 185113989 (Comments: 2) | emmelcee (Discussed changesets: 2) | A little late, but, hello :) commented 2026-09-02 15:52:52 UTC by emmelcee ♦1 |
| 166914374 (Comments: 2) | ohmanger (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi, a fair question. The details for Woodlands Outdoor Education Centre were duplicated on both the main building and the surrounding area. I removed the details from the building to keep to the "One feature, one OSM element" rule. |
| 172474213 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_GeoRelay (Discussed changesets: 6) | Drawing way/1433254414 as a sidewalk of Camomile Street so that it twice crosses the main road of which it is a sidewalk was unhelpful. I have now seen so much low quality pedestrian mapping from PedstrianMapping_* that I am inclined to propo... commented 2026-09-02 12:30:48 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 172468499 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_HopMapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please don't split highway=footway + footway=crossing ways either side of a crossing island unless you also split the road. This leaves a single highway=crossing node intersecting a non-crossing way and two crossing ways without crossing nodes.<... commented 2026-09-02 11:14:53 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 181674867 (Comments: 1) | Satiz125 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Undiscussed and low quality edits removed #UberUnhelpful Please don't edit OSM unless you know and care what you are doing. commented 2026-09-02 09:35:19 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 178043336 (Comments: 3) | Megadyptes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah, grand. Sounds like a little more investigation might be needed then. I'll have a look next time I'm in the area. commented 2026-09-02 08:58:55 UTC by mstrbrid ♦62 |
| 188400863 (Comments: 1) | BCNorwich (Discussed changesets: 263) | Thank you for these fixes, very much appreciated! I'm trying to spot them as I edit but it's not always clear commented 2026-09-02 08:14:51 UTC by ceirios ♦145 |
| 187399633 (Comments: 6) | zackrossdino2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I highly apologise for everything I did, I will leave OSM for a while and slowly understand it before coming back, thanks for making me realise what I did commented 2026-09-02 07:04:16 UTC by zackrossdino2 ♦2 |
| 188386198 (Comments: 1) | liveistikhara (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed online business that has no presence on Oxford Street commented 2026-09-02 05:07:16 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188360925 (Comments: 1) | Alvinearthworm8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there. I'm about half a mile away and last time I checked, at least part of Hell Nook has asphalt so can be labelled as such until it veers on to fields (it's now down as unpaved throughout). OSM doesn't include all the designatio... commented 2026-09-01 20:07:30 UTC by no details provided here ♦58 |
| 188370338 (Comments: 1) | Mauls (Discussed changesets: 132) | Hi Mauls, What have you added here? Just "South Wales" isn't very helpful Cheers, Ceirios commented 2026-09-01 18:12:05 UTC by ceirios ♦145 |
| 186946811 (Comments: 1) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hey just to make sure you know, some of these changes were fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188294982 due to a copy+paste error commented 2026-09-01 14:58:45 UTC by ntzm ♦73 |
| 172422432 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_GeoRelay (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please don't split a highway=footway footway=crossing way into two separate crossing ways unless you have also split the road and added two separate highway=crossing nodes . Doing half a job is not actually helpful for pedestrian routing and pot... commented 2026-09-01 14:49:31 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188304101 (Comments: 1) | SmithyScotland (Discussed changesets: 26) | Thank you! commented 2026-09-01 13:30:46 UTC by jayaddison ♦49 |
| 188362267 (Comments: 1) | Huw Ants (Discussed changesets: 1) | Prynhawn da, and croeso mawr i OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your edit and for adding this information. It is generally correct, however, the `name` tag is only used for places, object, roads etc. with a recognised name, while `addr:housename`... commented 2026-09-01 13:05:52 UTC by Preben Vangberg ♦9 |
| 188235205 (Comments: 1) | Planko87 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188343529 commented 2026-09-01 12:27:50 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188207460 (Comments: 3) | mbenntll (Discussed changesets: 1) | No worries, I understand you were using StreetComplete and what its limitations are. It’s a great tool! I’ve edited the map to add that detail in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188360494, thanks for your help! :) commented 2026-09-01 11:56:51 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 188108344 (Comments: 1) | WhiskyMacK (Discussed changesets: 18) | The relation is completely invalid, with lots of outer polygons enclosed by the site's outer boundary - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-3.21831&lat=56.18021&zoom=17&baselayer=OSM%20Carto%20(OSMF)&opacity=... commented 2026-09-01 10:37:01 UTC by tms13 ♦91 |
| 188346231 (Comments: 1) | Iwouldneverkillmyself (Discussed changesets: 2) | There may be a CCTV installation here, but it's not Flock ANPR as they don't operate in the UK. commented 2026-09-01 08:52:54 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188347045 (Comments: 1) | Iwouldneverkillmyself (Discussed changesets: 2) | There may be a CCTV installation here, but it's not Flock ANPR as they don't operate in the UK. commented 2026-09-01 08:52:17 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,918 |
| 188299456 (Comments: 5) | niallain (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yep, sadly, at least the ones you've got from the postcode finder. There are some threads on the forums where people have got postcodes from UPRN data - it's not something I do but it may help you. https://community.openstreet... commented 2026-08-31 17:12:03 UTC by ceirios ♦145 |
| 186568540 (Comments: 2) | Darac Marjal (Discussed changesets: 1) | sorry meant temporary as in not permanent... commented 2026-08-31 15:57:18 UTC by Tim Grose ♦15 |
| 188258807 (Comments: 2) | chrisb2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the comments. This is my first go at updating data. I take the point about the private tags, and will remove the tags for bicycle, foot, horse and motor vehicle. I live locally and the riverside path is a current topic of interest. I wa... commented 2026-08-31 14:57:47 UTC by chrisb2 ♦1 |
| 182767347 (Comments: 2) | M V Ramana (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I acknowledge and appreciate your feedback and the corrections. Thank you. I will take greater care to avoid these errors going forward. commented 2026-08-31 11:00:34 UTC by M V Ramana ♦1 |
| 79984201 (Comments: 2) | Dean Woodhouse (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes. Will do. Thanks commented 2026-08-31 09:05:56 UTC by Dean Woodhouse ♦1 |
| 184869939 (Comments: 1) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 55) | It seems wrong that https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/667468130 has been changed to a living_street yet foot=no and bicycle=no? commented 2026-08-31 08:36:24 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,865 |
| 188262815 (Comments: 1) | james74949 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I've reduced the volume of the names. commented 2026-08-31 05:47:27 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,356 |
| 188265073 (Comments: 1) | Bus5top (Discussed changesets: 1) | so far I have only edited the northern part of HS2 above Birmingham, however when/if this gets approved I can do the rest. commented 2026-08-30 18:40:41 UTC by Bus5top ♦1 |
| 188264759 (Comments: 1) | MagicPocketbook462 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Paper advertisement leaflet and the legal address in the website privacy policy points to Lagness Road, while FHRS seems to incorrectly list Pagham Road. commented 2026-08-30 18:29:46 UTC by MagicPocketbook462 ♦16 |
| 7681297 (Comments: 1) | drcoffee (Discussed changesets: 1) | did you end up exporting this? commented 2026-08-30 15:27:03 UTC by zackrossdino2 ♦2 |
| 188235672 (Comments: 2) | Ravenacre (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I can’t see what changes you made. It looks like you out the wrong path in again? The one I took off. KU11 and KU19 are the ones you’re referring to, which I am aware of. KU19 leaded up the field and then back down again. Th... commented 2026-08-30 11:52:15 UTC by Ravenacre ♦1 |
| 188212615 (Comments: 2) | Slartibartfast141 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you! It's nice to see the town up to date. commented 2026-08-30 08:02:14 UTC by Slartibartfast141 ♦2 |
| 185555652 (Comments: 1) | Flockfucker69 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Flockfucker69,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:39:01 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 187794520 (Comments: 1) | Yellowellohello (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Yellowellohello,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:38:26 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 158576076 (Comments: 1) | DorneyLake123 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Thank you! commented 2026-08-29 21:10:22 UTC by HandyHat ♦6 |
| 169408308 (Comments: 2) | jSeke (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello, here is the Scottish Government's Gaelic names authority's page for the street: https://www.ainmean-aite.scot/?id=39210 which says the name has been used since the 1890s. I don't have records from them but I did find on the seco... commented 2026-08-29 21:02:50 UTC by jSeke ♦32 |
| 188194206 (Comments: 5) | dudone (Discussed changesets: 102) | It’s nothing to do with my opinion of the wiki, it’s to do with the need for a way to document and achieve community consensus on what tags mean. Not everyone’s interpretation of “one feature, one element” is always goin... commented 2026-08-29 20:37:35 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 186197631 (Comments: 1) | ChezFrogLegs (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi chez, the links onto/off New Airport Way (for buses and taxis) should not have motor_vehicle=designated added, as this implies that all motor vehicles are permitted, when they are not. commented 2026-08-29 18:30:46 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦377 |
| 188207482 (Comments: 1) | Mapikids (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hiya, thanks for the additions. This changeset spans four countries; please split your edits up in future so that local mappers can review them without having to review changes for different countries which they’re not familiar with. Thi... commented 2026-08-29 18:15:26 UTC by gurglypipe ♦1,109 |
| 188206431 (Comments: 1) | Adam Neil Baker (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for adding these buildings! Please make sure to use 'Q' to square each building, this will make them look neater and will be more accurate :) commented 2026-08-29 16:39:43 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦377 |
| 188203743 (Comments: 1) | Alex_457 (Discussed changesets: 63) | source also bustimes.org commented 2026-08-29 15:36:24 UTC by Alex_457 ♦83 |
| 176449186 (Comments: 2) | mapman555 (Discussed changesets: 1) | dunno what the best practice is but it looks like it's a separate way now, I walked by the other day and I've got no complaints about how it looks! commented 2026-08-29 15:11:14 UTC by mapman555 ♦1 |
| 185565146 (Comments: 1) | sleet2412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Not sure about adding small driveways (major task & cluttersome), but would at least need private tags. commented 2026-08-29 13:58:39 UTC by RunningSeeds ♦3 |
| 186581859 (Comments: 1) | sleet2412 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, you may wish to check if the use of relations of footpaths and school building is appropriate here at West End Primary School. What happens in some route planners is that a dotted 'named walking route' (like Leeds Country Way)... commented 2026-08-29 12:51:37 UTC by RunningSeeds ♦3 |
| 188154315 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 113) | Thanks for the report, it was an incorrect copy/paste of a postcode. Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188188804 commented 2026-08-29 10:13:49 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 186666462 (Comments: 3) | SalliSiiri45 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! Sorry for the late reply! Sure, thank you for updating it! commented 2026-08-29 08:24:20 UTC by SalliSiiri45 ♦2 |
| 187460776 (Comments: 3) | Yorvik Prestigitator (Discussed changesets: 91) | Ok, well I have removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188178805 commented 2026-08-29 04:39:40 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 188012325 (Comments: 3) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 48) | Thanks, that looks better now commented 2026-08-29 04:36:27 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦445 |
| 188175328 (Comments: 1) | Berdly (Discussed changesets: 20) | I accidentally hit upload while trying to select the proper text to change the changeset name. That’s why it’s a false duplicate of my last summary :p commented 2026-08-29 01:09:39 UTC by Berdly ♦21 |