| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 175266653 (Comments: 5) | confusedbuffalo (Discussed changesets: 90) | OK that seems quite clear. I'll try and watch out for that. Thanks for replacing the postal town BTW Sorry to bother you with all this commented 2025-12-08 10:45:12 UTC by ⇄ john paul jones & gringo ♦21 |
| 170540525 (Comments: 3) | AlmostSurelyRob (Discussed changesets: 5) | * I should *not* be taking wiki too literally, I meant. commented 2025-12-08 09:24:05 UTC by AlmostSurelyRob ♦5 |
| 175600292 (Comments: 5) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | That makes sense. Thank you for reminding me that we all have different mapping styles. In case you don't know about it, HDYC is a useful tool for keeping track of discussions that haven't been replied to (amongst other things): ... commented 2025-12-08 08:58:06 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 175605321 (Comments: 4) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 111) | You have cited the law several times in this and other discussions, but you haven't answered my question. Your recent blocks at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19112 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19125 have sugge... commented 2025-12-08 08:51:38 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 175410402 (Comments: 11) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | Yes, that's how sentences work, you can say one thing and then qualify it with another. "It is sunny today but there will be rain around 2pm." Facetiousness aside, a typical case is https://cycle.travel/map?from=&to=&fro... commented 2025-12-08 08:36:12 UTC by Richard ♦223 |
| 175606407 (Comments: 1) | Peter Motte (Discussed changesets: 3) | A single tree is not a wood. commented 2025-12-08 06:27:49 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,015 |
| 171889634 (Comments: 2) | caitnahc (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello, thank you for your message. I mapped this area through an OSM project which instructed me to not map residential sidewalks, but to tag the roadways with sidewalk= if I could see that there were sidewalks present from the imagery. <... commented 2025-12-08 00:36:25 UTC by caitnahc ♦2 |
| 175595315 (Comments: 5) | extua (Discussed changesets: 5) | fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175643734 commented 2025-12-07 23:48:48 UTC by extua ♦6 |
| 175624789 (Comments: 1) | Meatba11s (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this address. If you know the area well, then it would be great to add the other buildings and there addresses as well? Also if the construction work is finished we should be able to update the roads to re... commented 2025-12-07 23:15:51 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175543133 (Comments: 1) | gracar2002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, looks good. Do you have any questions? commented 2025-12-07 23:02:00 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175412527 (Comments: 1) | James Wheare (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Jmes, this looks good to me! commented 2025-12-07 22:53:13 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175356127 (Comments: 1) | Superstore Media (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this is tagged as leisure=fitness_centre sport=boxing I think the more normal way of doing this is to use leisure=sports_centre as well as sport = (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre ) commented 2025-12-07 22:17:15 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175583957 (Comments: 3) | RyanLittleKing (Discussed changesets: 1) | I meant to do lanes I'll fix that commented 2025-12-07 22:07:55 UTC by RyanLittleKing ♦1 |
| 155484309 (Comments: 1) | WakefieldMapper (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776541567/history has shop = bus that was added in this edit shop=bus ? What is sold here? bus tickets? bus vehicles? something else? commented 2025-12-07 19:38:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175521764 (Comments: 3) | tjnakano (Discussed changesets: 118) | I’ve reverted this change (as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175634900) as above. Happy to chat if you think the reasoning above is incorrect :) commented 2025-12-07 18:21:47 UTC by gurglypipe ♦953 |
| 174423070 (Comments: 1) | Elliot12345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/175634608 commented 2025-12-07 18:10:21 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,507 |
| 147970865 (Comments: 1) | mapboy63 (Discussed changesets: 2) | In the spirit of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element I suggest it makes sense to only map Chorltonville once, not twice. The feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107039785 with identical tag... commented 2025-12-07 17:34:06 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 135677248 (Comments: 2) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 131) | Yes, Tag:shop=trade + trade=building_supplies is equivalent here. I've updated the tags. commented 2025-12-07 14:28:50 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦292 |
| 174496109 (Comments: 3) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 8) | I have added a note about this area to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5082201 for someone who cares about the quality of the map to investigate. commented 2025-12-07 14:15:22 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 168895562 (Comments: 1) | MacLondon (Discussed changesets: 260) | Is there a crossing island at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12980053851 ? commented 2025-12-07 14:15:08 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 295594 (Comments: 3) | Ben (Discussed changesets: 4) | OK i have found the photos, but it's a photo from a long way back. It appears to be a bridge between 2 wooden fences that you climb over. I can't see more detail than that. commented 2025-12-07 11:23:31 UTC by Ben ♦3 |
| 171728646 (Comments: 4) | Pink Duck (Discussed changesets: 43) | Agreed, done. commented 2025-12-07 08:58:01 UTC by Pink Duck ♦164 |
| 175605771 (Comments: 1) | TobyTot (Discussed changesets: 1) | (Review requested) That looks fine, thanks for updating it. commented 2025-12-07 07:33:29 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 22122165 (Comments: 1) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 171) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164627765/history has shop = builders_merchant that was added in this edit shop=builders_merchant ? Is it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityourself or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag... commented 2025-12-07 04:22:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 166786171 (Comments: 1) | Tallguy (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12864977546/history has shop = builders_merchant that was added in this edit shop=builders_merchant ? Is it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityourself or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... commented 2025-12-07 04:22:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175355800 (Comments: 1) | Superstore Media (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just having a quick look at this, edit looks grat. commented 2025-12-06 21:07:05 UTC by Chris Fleming ♦381 |
| 175595227 (Comments: 1) | bbqman (Discussed changesets: 40) | also source: https://boringdonhall.co.uk/ and Wikipedia/Wikidata commented 2025-12-06 17:44:05 UTC by bbqman ♦34 |
| 146263214 (Comments: 1) | CjMalone (Discussed changesets: 111) | I'm not sure about the name change here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/54.518700/-1.502995 from "Morton Park Beefeater" to "Morton Park" The latter is the branch name used on the website, but... commented 2025-12-06 17:28:44 UTC by phodgkin ♦73 |
| 162246700 (Comments: 6) | mrpacmanmap (Discussed changesets: 49) | Hi again, Apologies if the links were not working, I'll explain with some images here - https://ibb.co/8LwhFMX7 This one here routes via Alwin road, while valid - you can simply stick to Powke Lane for a more direct route, it appears the ... commented 2025-12-06 12:25:38 UTC by FoldForever ♦1 |
| 174757286 (Comments: 1) | sjorford (Discussed changesets: 14) | Would planned:place=town suffice for the time being, seeing as its development plans envisions it as one? commented 2025-12-06 00:36:59 UTC by Aethonatic ♦16 |
| 164834965 (Comments: 2) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 25) | This really interesting (if you can excuse my enthusiasm). It seems that that UPRN was at the end of the road, but has then been moved. I added it manually when it was at the junction between "Huntington Road" and "Brandsby Grove"... commented 2025-12-05 23:56:48 UTC by philipcullen ♦15 |
| 146527689 (Comments: 1) | ZenPhil (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11538082797/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:19:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 154110145 (Comments: 1) | The Local Surveyor (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12061618925/history has reference = 12508 that was added in this edit maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref would fit? ref= is widely used for references commented 2025-12-05 15:52:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 152986220 (Comments: 3) | Yavotch (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks. I thought it was probably something like that. commented 2025-12-05 13:12:48 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175412690 (Comments: 8) | Pete Owens (Discussed changesets: 111) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19111 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19112 commented 2025-12-05 12:32:35 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 168543413 (Comments: 2) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 24) | I made it up. I did see that a couple days ago and think 'what a crazy tag, who put that there' and then I realised... I think the rationale was that the campsite is only open for visitors on a select few days of the year (for example the G... commented 2025-12-05 11:23:38 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 165346079 (Comments: 1) | Robert Whittaker (Discussed changesets: 131) | Do you think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4807749 is sufficient to delete that postbox? I see that you edited it just two months earlier commented 2025-12-05 09:19:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175535551 (Comments: 1) | AALICH (Discussed changesets: 1) | For a road, or other object which doesn't have an address in the conventional sense, the postal_code tag which you've already used is more appropriate. On roads, it's often truncated to just the postcode district (IG3). That... commented 2025-12-05 08:43:51 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175527041 (Comments: 1) | gwilliams2nd (Discussed changesets: 4) | (Review requested) Pedestrians are implicitly allowed on highway=cycleway ways in the UK, please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#Foot_access_on_cycleways and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags... commented 2025-12-05 08:18:57 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 90596307 (Comments: 1) | JMWT (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, I believe this land is Woodland Trust and cycling/horse riding is permitted, what is your source for bicycle=no and horse=no? Thanks commented 2025-12-05 00:19:42 UTC by letsridebikes ♦70 |
| 175506090 (Comments: 1) | run'n'ride (Discussed changesets: 17) | Why are you still doing this? You've been asked so many times to stop commented 2025-12-05 00:14:52 UTC by letsridebikes ♦70 |
| 175476817 (Comments: 3) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | OSM must reflect the world as it is not how you wish it was. The law is clear that cycling on pavements is prohibited; there is no exception for disabled people or children. And when folk rely on personal abuse to make a point it is a s... commented 2025-12-04 23:19:41 UTC by Pete Owens ♦73 |
| 174577957 (Comments: 5) | matty817 (Discussed changesets: 7) | The tags were added by mistake and have since been fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175477758 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175510217. commented 2025-12-04 18:05:32 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 173961876 (Comments: 3) | Loshu (Discussed changesets: 15) | Thank you for fixing this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175477758 - I have also fixed another case of the same problem in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175510217. commented 2025-12-04 18:04:49 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 175449595 (Comments: 5) | NTUllswatervalleyPaths (Discussed changesets: 4) | Great. I’ve made the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175498881 No worries, one of the great things about OSM is that things can always be changed again to improve them. If you could leave a bit more contextual info in ... commented 2025-12-04 14:54:01 UTC by gurglypipe ♦953 |
| 175468650 (Comments: 2) | DinoDoesMapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | You're right. I'm new to mapping here so thought I'd just edit a small section at once but I can get on that as soon as I can :) commented 2025-12-04 12:59:33 UTC by DinoDoesMapping ♦1 |
| 174355345 (Comments: 3) | Peter N Brooks (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you used the iD editor, which shows the house name alongside the other address fields you added. Let me know if you have any more questions or if you would like me to change this for you. Thanks again for your helpful work... commented 2025-12-04 12:53:49 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 160841042 (Comments: 4) | BarryMyles (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19916224 the new object for this area is still described as a forest of palm trees :) Regards, Marc commented 2025-12-04 12:09:50 UTC by marc__marc ♦1,327 |
| 167323216 (Comments: 4) | Paul Berry (Discussed changesets: 55) | Shop tag removed as advised. commented 2025-12-04 11:00:40 UTC by Paul Berry ♦135 |
| 175391036 (Comments: 1) | William Oldfield (Discussed changesets: 2) | This was correctly tagged, as the track is clearly visible in aerial imagery and is on OS OpenMap Local. Adding access=private was correct (thanks), deleting the other tags, presumably in order to stop it rendering, is not. Reverted in https:/... commented 2025-12-04 00:39:33 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175463452 (Comments: 1) | William Oldfield (Discussed changesets: 2) | Changing access=private to access=no changes the meaning from "access only with explicit permission" to "no access for any transport mode", which is unlikely to be correct. You can read the documentation for the access key ... commented 2025-12-04 00:34:22 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175466221 (Comments: 3) | philipcullen (Discussed changesets: 25) | I've now updated the casing in Bexhill and the database for any other updates. commented 2025-12-04 00:08:33 UTC by philipcullen ♦15 |
| 173098886 (Comments: 1) | jonwil28 (Discussed changesets: 2) | If the car park is open, why not tag this as amenity=parking? commented 2025-12-03 20:52:08 UTC by phodgkin ♦73 |
| 175461464 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 564) | shop=vacant was clearly leftover from older versions commented 2025-12-03 19:43:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 174717771 (Comments: 1) | Dave Venables (Discussed changesets: 114) | Thank you for your dilligent work. When making changes like this to work done by a new mapper, it's well worth leaving a comment on the changes you are fixing to share your valuable experience with new mappers. commented 2025-12-03 18:12:33 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 175440284 (Comments: 1) | Maptapper (Discussed changesets: 21) | As always, thank you for your good work on the map. What are these realignments based on, and are you sure they are more accurate than the previous routes? Writing changeset comments longer than two words helps reviewers understand your... commented 2025-12-03 17:58:14 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 174989830 (Comments: 1) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | Again, the description "track" makes these changes hard to understand and review. commented 2025-12-03 17:55:29 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 174989190 (Comments: 1) | TomJeffs (Discussed changesets: 44) | Please remember to write helpful, descriptive changeset comments. This modifies eight different ways and adds four, but the description "track" makes it hard for reviewers to understand what you did and why you did it: https://wiki.openstr... commented 2025-12-03 17:52:34 UTC by tomhukins ♦248 |
| 175441473 (Comments: 2) | plet (Discussed changesets: 2) | Got it. Thanks for the feedback commented 2025-12-03 16:29:40 UTC by plet ♦2 |
| 175361027 (Comments: 1) | sajeverett (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I've tweaked your changes so that instead of the footway being deleted, it's now marked as disused:highway=footway. This is because it's a public right of way, so it would be likely that someone would re-add the missing section, no... commented 2025-12-03 15:35:45 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 153395522 (Comments: 1) | LakatosVL (Discussed changesets: 20) | I think this is an incorrect edit. The track looks like a gravel track with grass up the middle. This isn't a road. commented 2025-12-03 15:05:06 UTC by daveemtb ♦29 |
| 152572862 (Comments: 1) | rory_070707 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5077552 ? commented 2025-12-03 14:26:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 152585761 (Comments: 1) | rory_070707 (Discussed changesets: 6) | can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5077551 ? commented 2025-12-03 14:25:38 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175377994 (Comments: 2) | gurglypipe (Discussed changesets: 140) | Ah, good point, I hadn’t realised that tag was deprecated now. Thanks. Added oneway:bicycle=no and cycleway:left:oneway=-1, and changed cycleway:left from opposite_track to track in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175448878 commented 2025-12-03 14:12:14 UTC by gurglypipe ♦953 |
| 175329354 (Comments: 1) | Jens Korth at airport-information dot com (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey Jens, are you aware of the current situation involving Nottingham City Airport whose runways you've retagged as being in use? News outlets have consistently reported this place as having been closed. commented 2025-12-03 13:02:23 UTC by Aethonatic ♦16 |
| 174395606 (Comments: 2) | matty817 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks. I haven't been completely indiscriminate here, but I'll be more careful in the future, particularly as someone else has raised similar concerns. commented 2025-12-03 12:05:54 UTC by matty817 ♦6 |
| 144637738 (Comments: 1) | HillWithSmallFields (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223714664/history has building:part = 14951 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-03 09:20:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175423720 (Comments: 1) | YMAMC (Discussed changesets: 1) | You inadvertently dragged a section of Campion Grange, which is why the editor displayed so many warnings. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175424400 commented 2025-12-03 00:11:35 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175312896 (Comments: 1) | ADHBEKB (Discussed changesets: 7) | Oops - I think that something's gone a bit wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238218979#map=19/52.032914/-0.550840 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238218977#map=19/52.033010/-0.550553 . They used to join - see https://overpass-t... commented 2025-12-03 00:05:39 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 174970701 (Comments: 1) | SithMaster (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175424358 - I suggest you learn what "standard tags" are before you start making damaging mass edits to OSM commented 2025-12-03 00:05:28 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 175035674 (Comments: 1) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 905) | Hi, it would have been better to do a complete revert of changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174970701 as it was basically all vandalism commented 2025-12-03 00:04:48 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 175407373 (Comments: 5) | run'n'ride (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello, Andy from the Data Working Group here - just picking up a couple of points from the above: > I also confirm on OS maps. For the avoidance of doubt, we can't use that as a source for OSM, unless it's either out of... commented 2025-12-02 21:43:11 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 139049543 (Comments: 9) | run'n'ride (Discussed changesets: 17) | 12pjw34 is still at it, damaging the map, nothing has changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175407373#map=16/51.66596/-2.31429 commented 2025-12-02 18:50:01 UTC by letsridebikes ♦70 |
| 175338726 (Comments: 1) | cotonouakchottawarsaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for making this change. Fyi your edit removed building=apartments which I have just restored. commented 2025-12-02 18:45:38 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 12641995 (Comments: 1) | blackadder (Discussed changesets: 33) | I realise that this edit was made a very long time ago, but would the un-gated and unadopted streets within the Four Oaks Park private estate now be better tagged as ownership=private + access=destination ? commented 2025-12-02 16:25:34 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 167832038 (Comments: 2) | run'n'ride (Discussed changesets: 17) | Access "All" is incorrect as it's a footpath. I'd amended to detail no to "All", but specify yes to footpath. By detailing yes to All you're opening the use to everything! All should be No, footpath should be Design... commented 2025-12-02 15:06:56 UTC by run'n'ride ♦9 |
| 175369190 (Comments: 3) | CherokeeXJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your reply. I've restored the pond (only) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175404206 commented 2025-12-02 14:03:11 UTC by rskedgell ♦1,674 |
| 175375385 (Comments: 3) | Mike61G (Discussed changesets: 1) | You've obviously not had to unpick situations like this (unjoining multiple area outlines from highways) to find a duplicated section of highway. Dystelegh Road had a duplicated section on top of Chantry Road that I traced and deleted after corr... commented 2025-12-02 11:42:56 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,015 |
| 169857414 (Comments: 1) | Klingsor78 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Strawberry Line is the name of a route which traverses along this path. There are numerous routes traversing along this path, therefore the name shouldn't be on the way, but in it relation. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/552... commented 2025-12-02 10:47:30 UTC by DaveF ♦1,590 |
| 175074353 (Comments: 2) | Palgrave Peter (Discussed changesets: 39) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-02 09:17:03 UTC by Palgrave Peter ♦20 |
| 175368901 (Comments: 1) | felix Markillie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your building outline duplicated an existing building, so I've removed it. Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-02 07:32:07 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,015 |
| 175378419 (Comments: 1) | daniella raffa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please see the comment about the other AED commented 2025-12-02 06:51:40 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,015 |
| 175378451 (Comments: 1) | daniella raffa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, If the AED isn't inside where is it? On the wall outside? Then it should be joined to the wall in the correct position and this indicated in a defibrillator:location= tag so folk can find it. Need help just ask. Regards Bernard... commented 2025-12-02 06:50:19 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,015 |
| 175369627 (Comments: 1) | Howie67 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your new residential area is within an existing mapped residential area, Way: 3707308. So it's not needed, (it wouldn't be tagged as a house anyway). I've removed the area, Way: 1455256230 D... commented 2025-12-02 06:39:30 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,015 |
| 173444988 (Comments: 2) | ThePigeonCompany15 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted due to clear vandalism deletion of motorway slip roads commented 2025-12-02 01:25:22 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 173403616 (Comments: 1) | Ayyayo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Can you check your edits here regarding oneway roads? I can see you've removed the roundabout, but the way the roads are set doesn't really make sense as it stands, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139529913. There's no up... commented 2025-12-02 01:17:36 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦142 |
| 174826705 (Comments: 3) | b-unicycling (Discussed changesets: 308) | (for completeness - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/b-unicycling/diary/407814 ) Thanks! commented 2025-12-01 23:24:19 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 86937588 (Comments: 3) | SK53 (Discussed changesets: 171) | Thanks - down to 388 now... commented 2025-12-01 23:22:54 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 175149795 (Comments: 1) | Phoebe lloyd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Phoebe, Many thanks for adding an AED to the map at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13333614301 Is there any chance you could provide a better location description though? I assume that the "bn124ee" is supposed to be t... commented 2025-12-01 22:53:13 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦292 |
| 175294966 (Comments: 1) | Akiera Smith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi , Could you check the location that you've given to the AED node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13341548901 ? At the moment it's placed inside a house. Is it really located there? Also, could you give a better location descrip... commented 2025-12-01 22:49:03 UTC by Robert Whittaker ♦292 |
| 175114505 (Comments: 3) | Simon Sustrans (Discussed changesets: 7) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-01 22:41:24 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,569 |
| 175365714 (Comments: 1) | peterjbeer (Discussed changesets: 1) | (I'm just a mapper, not part of OSM) Are you sure that putting street names from findmystreet complies with that site's licence conditions? commented 2025-12-01 19:46:04 UTC by poggie ♦5 |
| 174811077 (Comments: 3) | kitsee (Discussed changesets: 14) | I'm sorry for this, we should had communicate a bit more during RFC. It has been discussed on community forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/rfc-power-circuits-routing-proposal/128903 You should look at power=line_section as weel,... commented 2025-12-01 18:01:51 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦161 |
| 175360157 (Comments: 1) | Corey Wainwright (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure your mapping is correct? Are the apartments now a wood surface foortway? Is there really a footpath between the houses? Has that area now become a new residential area? Regards Bernard. commented 2025-12-01 16:23:40 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,015 |
| 174526748 (Comments: 3) | kitsee (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is it written on ground? I thought about this good practice otherwise: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things commented 2025-12-01 14:00:47 UTC by InfosReseaux ♦161 |