| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 183294100 (Comments: 1) | dinodino1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:183351522 commented 2026-05-29 11:57:20 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 180143851 (Comments: 1) | Numbergod (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13433682624/history has image = https://streetcomplete.app/p/329749.jpg that was added in this edit https://streetcomplete.app/p/329749.jpg is a link to a temporary files hosted at streetcomplete.app. Note... commented 2026-05-28 08:46:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 156995693 (Comments: 4) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 39) | open to interpretation! I'm thinking about possibly changing it, but am unsure as it's kind of recognisable now commented 2026-05-27 11:36:28 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦55 |
| 176333346 (Comments: 3) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 21) | brilliant, thanks for checking :) commented 2026-05-22 06:41:54 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 182855991 (Comments: 1) | Yhen Corsino (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:182956315 commented 2026-05-21 05:50:09 UTC by Wildsharky ♦506 |
| 182902399 (Comments: 1) | Huddy1234 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:182917706 commented 2026-05-21 05:41:35 UTC by Wildsharky ♦506 |
| 182010592 (Comments: 2) | lee_bei (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, good spotting. Can you change it to right tag as my phone app has no such cooking equipment Cheers commented 2026-05-20 01:01:40 UTC by lee_bei ♦1 |
| 182489472 (Comments: 1) | gabbarrion (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:182537158 commented 2026-05-12 11:29:14 UTC by Wildsharky ♦506 |
| 182012194 (Comments: 3) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway, in the members section, has riverbank or waterbody crossed through and not to be used in waterway relations. There is a link to the talk page about this. I think this is a good topic to ... commented 2026-05-11 03:01:29 UTC by nevw ♦2,226 |
| 182350962 (Comments: 1) | willgulliv5r (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 182453080 commented 2026-05-10 07:28:28 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 182143760 (Comments: 5) | DamianLewis851 (Discussed changesets: 1) | if you want a source of elevation data that we have permission to use, checkout the LiDAR DEM and DSM data from LINZ: https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/121859 and https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/122082 commented 2026-05-07 11:09:17 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 181522318 (Comments: 3) | Rudy44352 (Discussed changesets: 2) | A few more of the stray untagged nodes, hopefully to help you figure out what's causing them https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13763208533/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13763208555/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1376320... commented 2026-05-05 22:50:47 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦55 |
| 182199919 (Comments: 7) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 304) | Thank you, you are on the right track you are following a universally consistent format. It is difficult for editors when entering mobile numbers as the first digit following the mobile carrier prefix determines the format and not the number of digit... commented 2026-05-05 16:13:38 UTC by spongeb0b ♦2 |
| 181838334 (Comments: 4) | Romeowns (Discussed changesets: 2) | Legend, thank you for your efforts! commented 2026-05-03 10:01:55 UTC by Romeowns ♦1 |
| 164141670 (Comments: 1) | Healing Alexander Technique (Discussed changesets: 1) | this place is now call Feast Cafe commented 2026-04-29 07:02:49 UTC by Healing Alexander Technique ♦1 |
| 181530382 (Comments: 1) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 39) | Hello and welcome to OSM! I noticed that this building's geometry (w1343297228) became a bit tangled (self-intersecting) after your edit. I've gone ahead and fixed it using aerial imagery to keep the map accurate. Let me know if you have an... commented 2026-04-23 12:11:16 UTC by mikita_paloika ♦22 |
| 181655608 (Comments: 1) | johngc42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi johngc42, welcome to OSM editing. I have reviewed this edit to the bus stop 1378 on Wyndham Street. The name of the bus stop is Hobson Street (as confirmed in the GTFS data) . Note that AT bus stops are often named for the intersecting road when ... commented 2026-04-22 23:44:12 UTC by CoyKoi ♦236 |
| 181342500 (Comments: 1) | Far North District Council (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for your edits! In general, it's better to change attributes of roads rather than deleting them - otherwide someone might inadvertently add it back. in this case, i've restored the line but marked it as a 'private drivewa... commented 2026-04-17 11:19:17 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 181405896 (Comments: 1) | brevans (Discussed changesets: 15) | HI Relation 20455070 makes no sense. It only has one member and that has the role inner????????? I have deleted the relation and put the grass tags on the way 1499852180 commented 2026-04-17 10:35:27 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 177714931 (Comments: 3) | jepee (Discussed changesets: 24) | No response. Will not try to contact this mapper again! commented 2026-04-17 05:05:42 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 178027118 (Comments: 2) | oolaurence (Discussed changesets: 2) | No response. Part revert this changeset commented 2026-04-17 05:02:51 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 178526782 (Comments: 2) | AlwynWellington (Discussed changesets: 78) | hi and regret I am away from the country at present. And unable to make any considered comments on my phone. Kia ora, Alwyn commented 2026-04-16 09:49:53 UTC by AlwynWellington ♦60 |
| 180923074 (Comments: 2) | Cave Man NZ (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181253626 commented 2026-04-14 04:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,460 |
| 180922806 (Comments: 2) | Cave Man NZ (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/181253626 commented 2026-04-14 04:33:05 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,460 |
| 180671524 (Comments: 1) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 15) | Err no. Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=174.74034&lat=-36.73953&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_s... commented 2026-04-11 00:37:57 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 180436686 (Comments: 2) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 15) | I have taken the mall buildings and the Pukeroa Oruawhata House building relations and deleted them. I have replace them with simple ways with appropriate ways. The OSM guide is one feature = one OSM entry .. as the Mall has one entry that cov... commented 2026-04-11 00:31:41 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 103364992 (Comments: 1) | alpha-beta-soup (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, Another relation with shared segments see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.59368&lat=-40.36368&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segmen... commented 2026-04-10 05:30:50 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 112477778 (Comments: 1) | alpha-beta-soup (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.57803&lat=-40.37762&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_s... commented 2026-04-10 05:28:51 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 175434653 (Comments: 1) | lcmortensen (Discussed changesets: 167) | And again - outerways cannot share segments https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.59933&lat=-40.35591&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_i... commented 2026-04-10 05:22:53 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 180581519 (Comments: 4) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 60) | Should be done. I'm interested, how do you find all these issues? There are many charging attributes tagged very weirdly since it was not standardized for a while. Do you just go to taginfo, or just overpass turbo? commented 2026-04-09 18:17:29 UTC by stillhart ♦246 |
| 180803847 (Comments: 1) | lukexensen (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi, i'm not sure if "driveway" is correct for these shared alleyways which are effectively open to the public i believe the consensus in AU is to use service=pipestem. there are two other good suggestions if you click the link commented 2026-04-08 10:13:42 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 131592773 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Manchester Square includes the surrounding buildings .. they carry that as part of their address. Same in England. commented 2026-04-08 05:54:14 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 180976361 (Comments: 1) | Warin61 (Discussed changesets: 162) | Cool it a little. It’s an edit from half a decade ago. commented 2026-04-07 05:38:43 UTC by vaibhavnz ♦12 |
| 180881518 (Comments: 1) | JUngey1232 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 180925691 commented 2026-04-06 06:05:33 UTC by ajmat ♦213 |
| 180835107 (Comments: 2) | smithandjosh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thanks for that, I had seen that error and wasn’t sure where it was. Thank you very much for fixing it. Thanks, I missed that, looks like it would have been there from a previous editor that made changes for the T block constr... commented 2026-04-05 10:46:54 UTC by smithandjosh ♦1 |
| 180871595 (Comments: 1) | ralley (Discussed changesets: 42) | Source was actually local knowledge; LINZ Aerial Imagery commented 2026-04-04 20:10:28 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 177555326 (Comments: 1) | jaylowe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mulitploygon relation 20125744 residential deleted shared segments. Replaced with one simple way. A relation is not required. commented 2026-04-04 01:17:39 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 173303351 (Comments: 1) | Emma Js (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, the geoglyph sections were tagged with building:part as they are painted on the roof of the building and can be represented as part of the building. You can see how the building appears in 3D here: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=-39.0588860&lon=... commented 2026-04-03 16:11:20 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 179009894 (Comments: 1) | cmaggggg (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, could you please share your source for this edit? as far as i'm aware, construction will not start for another 20 years commented 2026-04-03 04:01:50 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 180608146 (Comments: 2) | applecuckoo (Discussed changesets: 2) | yeah, for the cycleway in particular they've already laid down concrete from the Burswood Drive side to somewhere behind the depot commented 2026-04-01 18:20:06 UTC by applecuckoo ♦4 |
| 180614399 (Comments: 1) | Rudy44352 (Discussed changesets: 2) | HI, Way 675830594 (forest) crosses it self. See red bits in https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=176.15680&lat=-38.52285&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cdupli... commented 2026-03-30 22:42:00 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 180573472 (Comments: 2) | Cookie_Cream (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes these are separate orgs that use the same venue (or parts of the same venue). commented 2026-03-30 21:30:33 UTC by Cookie_Cream ♦1 |
| 157523295 (Comments: 1) | Vardion (Discussed changesets: 3) | And leaving behind a broken relation 2749751. commented 2026-03-30 07:35:54 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 180539851 (Comments: 1) | Jasme98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not remove paths just because they are informal - this was correctly tagged as informal, not visible and surface=grass. It is definitely navigable as can be seen from the Mapillary imagery --- ... commented 2026-03-30 00:04:36 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 176933403 (Comments: 3) | YT_JoshTransit (Discussed changesets: 1) | oh sorry i meant the ones in te papapa, not the CRL. You added main_M, but it should actually be either main_MM, main_MD, or main_MS commented 2026-03-27 08:16:11 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 115587099 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi Multipolygon relation 13618251 parking Better mapped? Ways 1017013456, 1017013457, 1017013459 and 1017013458 can al be deleted - they have the wrong rolls anyway and can be replaced by ways 1017013452 and 1017013453 (gardens insid... commented 2026-03-26 06:03:51 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 159684835 (Comments: 1) | Vardion (Discussed changesets: 3) | It is a bit of a mess, insn't it! Relation 2724782 scrub is well and truly broken .. should it be deleted? Way: 1338514652 and Way: 1338953826 should be combined into one way... There are probably a lot more confused things here. commented 2026-03-26 05:42:22 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 180382217 (Comments: 1) | alexLuo1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | What is your source for the name here? I don't remember any signage --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180382217 commented 2026-03-25 23:46:02 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 180383341 (Comments: 1) | alexLuo1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't tag descriptions in the name field, it is for proper names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180380595 --- ... commented 2026-03-25 23:44:06 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 180233393 (Comments: 2) | Terry Gruijters (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your help. Still learning. I struggled trying to use the graphic interface only getting the right tags. It helped when I noticed the text entry option icon. The graphic interface only options just don't seem to allow correct designati... commented 2026-03-25 05:17:48 UTC by Terry Gruijters ♦1 |
| 180380595 (Comments: 1) | alexLuo1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't tag descriptions in the name field, it is for proper names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2026-03-24 23:46:12 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 131001117 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥_import (Discussed changesets: 29) | thanks boss 🫡 commented 2026-03-22 04:35:11 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 137370859 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Relation roles corrected commented 2026-03-21 03:53:53 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 137464827 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Relation roles corrected commented 2026-03-21 03:53:24 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 137442201 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Roles in relation 15980981 corrected. commented 2026-03-21 03:49:13 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 179849379 (Comments: 2) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Thanks for this. commented 2026-03-20 00:47:58 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦11 |
| 179609274 (Comments: 1) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 15) | HI The roles in relation 20304766 are incorrect.. The outside has been given the role 'inner' and the inside has been given the role 'outer'. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=178.16222&lat... commented 2026-03-19 23:54:51 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 177245114 (Comments: 1) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hi, What feature is relation Rotorua Central Mall (20086689), v1 trying to map? An indoor corridor? A building? A shop? It is tagged for all 3 ... I think it should be mapping the shop=mall as Each building has ... commented 2026-03-19 23:35:53 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 180001400 (Comments: 1) | kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changing the name is not the correct way to handle stages of decay please look in to life cycle prefixes on the OSM wiki --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1800... commented 2026-03-17 23:45:22 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179860625 (Comments: 1) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 85) | thanks ian. these people are forced to contribute to OSM by their uni professor, so i've reverted the rest of the poor quality edits commented 2026-03-17 10:49:55 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179885648 (Comments: 1) | NeutralDisposition (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179981597 commented 2026-03-17 05:13:16 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 179737095 (Comments: 1) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | You appear to be tagging "Hills Hoist" washing lines as carpet hangers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179737095 commented 2026-03-17 00:14:36 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179914617 (Comments: 1) | Samreddy (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset appears to just be fantasy mapping/vandalism --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179914617 commented 2026-03-17 00:00:53 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179886909 (Comments: 1) | BlakeQin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not add a generic name to every object, the name field is for proper names only --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179886909 commented 2026-03-16 23:39:33 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179858240 (Comments: 2) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Additionally you created a park where one already was mapped an used the incorrect generic name "Park" --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179858240 |
| 179886519 (Comments: 2) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | You have also changed a bus stop to a cafe, leaving some of the bus stop tags amongst other errors. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179886519 commented 2026-03-16 23:21:45 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179888008 (Comments: 1) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset id: 179939592 commented 2026-03-16 09:42:02 UTC by ajmat ♦213 |
| 179586727 (Comments: 2) | DoubleA (Discussed changesets: 57) | I'll give you till this Friday to reply back, otherwise I'll revert it Saturday NZT. commented 2026-03-16 03:00:01 UTC by EleGlobe ♦12 |
| 179752279 (Comments: 1) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Revert of 179744094 commented 2026-03-15 09:03:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 179651605 (Comments: 2) | Logan Wowwee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, I have added pedestrian access. Cheers commented 2026-03-14 22:30:37 UTC by Logan Wowwee ♦1 |
| 179864300 (Comments: 2) | Pankoj_R (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position. commented 2026-03-14 16:17:00 UTC by iandees ♦1,391 |
| 179568312 (Comments: 1) | Ishraka (Discussed changesets: 1) | the bus stop at this location was already mapped, so I've deleted the one that you created commented 2026-03-13 10:11:26 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179556673 (Comments: 1) | Daweiiiii (Discussed changesets: 1) | is this forest really called 'Tree1'? that seems very unlikely commented 2026-03-13 10:10:46 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179728883 (Comments: 1) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | unfortunately I've had to revert all your changes. You've created a bus stop inside someone's house, which is clearly not correct commented 2026-03-13 09:49:57 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179729496 (Comments: 1) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | this bus stop was already mapped, you created a new bus stop in exactly the same location commented 2026-03-13 09:47:55 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179734585 (Comments: 1) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | you created a postbox inside someone's private house, is this intentional? commented 2026-03-13 09:46:36 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179783320 (Comments: 1) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | is this really a carpet hanger? Carpet hangers are extremely rare in NZ, they only exist in Russia and ex-soviet countries commented 2026-03-13 09:43:24 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179723595 (Comments: 1) | Sandar Lynn (Discussed changesets: 3) | the kindergarten was already mapped. you've drawn a new area on top of the existing area, so i've deleted it commented 2026-03-13 09:41:13 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179790382 (Comments: 1) | Sandar Lynn (Discussed changesets: 3) | you've drawn a road on top of an existing road, which is not valid. Please don't ignore the errors in the editor. commented 2026-03-13 09:38:15 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179788849 (Comments: 1) | Sandar Lynn (Discussed changesets: 3) | please don't ignore the errors in the editor. If it shows a mistake, you should fix it commented 2026-03-13 09:37:05 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179753085 (Comments: 1) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 21) | Revert of 179725738 commented 2026-03-12 17:20:14 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 179756197 (Comments: 1) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 21) | ignore review_requested, accidentally misclicked commented 2026-03-12 12:34:58 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦11 |
| 179729321 (Comments: 2) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Bao, would like to know why landuse has been set to garages instead of landuse=grass? commented 2026-03-12 11:14:25 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦11 |
| 179570900 (Comments: 1) | Xiaotao_Wu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM - A few mistakes in these early edits... the name and shortname are not required as this information is in the address fields - name=4/13 Rengarenga Rise short_name=4/13 house Maybe also consider joining the OSM World dis... commented 2026-03-12 10:57:29 UTC by tastrax ♦1,206 |
| 179743574 (Comments: 2) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://discord.gg/openstreetmap commented 2026-03-12 10:48:58 UTC by tastrax ♦1,206 |
| 179742096 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This parking area does not need this name unless that is signposted somewhere at the location commented 2026-03-12 10:42:20 UTC by tastrax ♦1,206 |
| 179726196 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This lamp does not need a name. Description should also be information that you want to tell the map user about the object, rather than telling the world its your Uni home activity. commented 2026-03-12 10:40:28 UTC by tastrax ♦1,206 |
| 179725738 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This driveway doesnt need a name unless its signposted as such. It should also be connected to Glamorgan Drive commented 2026-03-12 10:37:18 UTC by tastrax ♦1,206 |
| 179729554 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This private parking area does not need a name unless signposted as such. commented 2026-03-12 10:35:28 UTC by tastrax ♦1,206 |
| 179725235 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | Welcome to OSM - This name on the street lighting is not required unless signed as such (which I doubt it is). If it has some reference number showing on the pole then it can have a ref key with the value (ie ref-1234B) commented 2026-03-12 10:33:01 UTC by tastrax ♦1,206 |
| 179729470 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This driveway should be highway=service service=driveway and no name unless its signposted as 'cb driveway' commented 2026-03-12 10:29:16 UTC by tastrax ♦1,206 |
| 171381614 (Comments: 2) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 15) | Further the multipoluygon should not share segments on the outer ways. In this case I have deleted the relation . Combined the 2 ways into one way and placed the tags on that way. commented 2026-03-12 04:05:08 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 179556695 (Comments: 1) | Houda568 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The name field is for real names only, not descriptions like "New houses are being built". Also building=house is for individual houses not a development area of multiple houses --- Published u... commented 2026-03-09 06:04:11 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179561665 (Comments: 1) | George_ZJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | You have connected the driveway to the footpath to the road which means it is unusable for vehicle routing --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179561665 commented 2026-03-09 06:01:23 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179558815 (Comments: 1) | lee_bei (Discussed changesets: 2) | You have changed the name and website but left the email, phone and operator unchanged, are these still correct? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179558815 commented 2026-03-09 05:58:41 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179554144 (Comments: 2) | Danielle- (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted the changeset --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179554144 commented 2026-03-09 03:24:19 UTC by CoyKoi ♦236 |
| 179556465 (Comments: 1) | Gracey13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, I have reviewed your changeset. These are good additions, thank you. I do have two points of feedback: Firstly, you have added an amenity=post_box but I think it's meant to be amenity=letter_box. You can read the distinction on O... commented 2026-03-09 03:06:58 UTC by CoyKoi ♦236 |
| 179518097 (Comments: 1) | KTT-NZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome. This changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks! commented 2026-03-08 11:59:27 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,578 |
| 166797454 (Comments: 1) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 15) | Relation deleted - shared segments, no roles Made simple way that includes surrounds and tagged that as community centre (no building tag as those are on the actual buildings) commented 2026-03-07 23:05:29 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 179376365 (Comments: 1) | kmaj008 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert of 179429774 commented 2026-03-06 07:18:07 UTC by 007Transformer ♦69 |
| 179373094 (Comments: 1) | theGradyConnell (Discussed changesets: 9) | thanks for all your edits! not sure if you're aware, but mapping details of bus depots somewhat helps AT's staff, since their software seems to use OpenStreetMap as a basemap - see timecode 00:10 in this video: https://facebook.com/reel/78... commented 2026-03-05 12:20:49 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179373891 (Comments: 1) | Warin61 (Discussed changesets: 162) | Changeset comment should be Resolve 'Moore Guy' from relation into simple way. Source - OSMInspector, OSM, bing commented 2026-03-05 00:34:32 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 178968064 (Comments: 2) | Little Yellow Bird (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179048693 commented 2026-03-04 05:33:23 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,460 |
| 178968052 (Comments: 2) | Little Yellow Bird (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332531 (Restore previous tags) commented 2026-03-04 05:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,815 |
| 179250624 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 142) | sure, done commented 2026-03-03 10:41:57 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179250890 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 142) | Yay! Looks like it complies with 'the rules'. commented 2026-03-02 23:41:13 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 179161351 (Comments: 3) | AmineAusAlbuquerque (Discussed changesets: 2) | aah, got it. yeah the east side of the road is also private! :) commented 2026-03-02 12:17:18 UTC by AmineAusAlbuquerque ♦2 |
| 151169089 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 142) | whoops, yeah this was totally broken. changed to a simple multipolygon: relation/17558978 commented 2026-03-02 11:53:19 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 173296133 (Comments: 2) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 16) | the linked wikidata entry answers this question with a surprisingly detailed answer. so i've restored the relation commented 2026-03-02 11:46:55 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179063445 (Comments: 1) | Mortein (Discussed changesets: 3) | heya, shall we delete it then? this would be more suitable for https://openhistoricalmap.org commented 2026-03-02 11:43:11 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦483 |
| 179138761 (Comments: 2) | aleph_null (Discussed changesets: 9) | The polygon should be fixed now, sorry about that! commented 2026-03-02 10:33:20 UTC by aleph_null ♦20 |
| 179198542 (Comments: 1) | gullwstravels (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Relation 20274479 - heath has a problem Outer ways cannot share segments. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=169.37918&lat=-45.19754&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_n... commented 2026-03-02 06:37:32 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |
| 170281222 (Comments: 1) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 16) | Name is for name only, not a description eg 'Terrace Houses'. Relation 19448184 deleted - shared segments. commented 2026-03-02 01:08:35 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,795 |