| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 131592773 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Manchester Square includes the surrounding buildings .. they carry that as part of their address. Same in England. commented 2026-04-08 05:54:14 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 180976361 (Comments: 1) | Warin61 (Discussed changesets: 162) | Cool it a little. It’s an edit from half a decade ago. commented 2026-04-07 05:38:43 UTC by vaibhavnz ♦12 |
| 180881518 (Comments: 1) | JUngey1232 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id: 180925691 commented 2026-04-06 06:05:33 UTC by ajmat ♦133 |
| 180923074 (Comments: 1) | Cave Man NZ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-04-06 04:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,884 |
| 180922806 (Comments: 1) | Cave Man NZ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-04-06 03:57:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,884 |
| 180835107 (Comments: 2) | smithandjosh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thanks for that, I had seen that error and wasn’t sure where it was. Thank you very much for fixing it. Thanks, I missed that, looks like it would have been there from a previous editor that made changes for the T block constr... commented 2026-04-05 10:46:54 UTC by smithandjosh ♦1 |
| 180871595 (Comments: 1) | ralley (Discussed changesets: 42) | Source was actually local knowledge; LINZ Aerial Imagery commented 2026-04-04 20:10:28 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 177555326 (Comments: 1) | jaylowe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mulitploygon relation 20125744 residential deleted shared segments. Replaced with one simple way. A relation is not required. commented 2026-04-04 01:17:39 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 173303351 (Comments: 1) | Emma Js (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, the geoglyph sections were tagged with building:part as they are painted on the roof of the building and can be represented as part of the building. You can see how the building appears in 3D here: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=-39.0588860&lon=... commented 2026-04-03 16:11:20 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦213 |
| 180581519 (Comments: 1) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hi, please check the chargers you added across the world. - "socket:type2_combo:capacity" doesn't exist - it should be "socket:type2_combo". - there are stations with a strange capacity of 250. - ... commented 2026-04-03 13:09:28 UTC by mueschel ♦7,027 |
| 179009894 (Comments: 1) | cmaggggg (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi, could you please share your source for this edit? as far as i'm aware, construction will not start for another 20 years commented 2026-04-03 04:01:50 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 180608146 (Comments: 2) | applecuckoo (Discussed changesets: 2) | yeah, for the cycleway in particular they've already laid down concrete from the Burswood Drive side to somewhere behind the depot commented 2026-04-01 18:20:06 UTC by applecuckoo ♦4 |
| 180614399 (Comments: 1) | Rudy44352 (Discussed changesets: 1) | HI, Way 675830594 (forest) crosses it self. See red bits in https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=176.15680&lat=-38.52285&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cdupli... commented 2026-03-30 22:42:00 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 180436686 (Comments: 1) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi. Mulptipoygon outer ways cannot share segments. See blue segments in https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=176.25120&lat=-38.14064&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in... commented 2026-03-30 22:37:04 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 180573472 (Comments: 2) | Cookie_Cream (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes these are separate orgs that use the same venue (or parts of the same venue). commented 2026-03-30 21:30:33 UTC by Cookie_Cream ♦1 |
| 157523295 (Comments: 1) | Vardion (Discussed changesets: 3) | And leaving behind a broken relation 2749751. commented 2026-03-30 07:35:54 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 180539851 (Comments: 1) | Jasme98 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not remove paths just because they are informal - this was correctly tagged as informal, not visible and surface=grass. It is definitely navigable as can be seen from the Mapillary imagery --- ... commented 2026-03-30 00:04:36 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 176933403 (Comments: 3) | YT_JoshTransit (Discussed changesets: 1) | oh sorry i meant the ones in te papapa, not the CRL. You added main_M, but it should actually be either main_MM, main_MD, or main_MS commented 2026-03-27 08:16:11 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 115587099 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hi Multipolygon relation 13618251 parking Better mapped? Ways 1017013456, 1017013457, 1017013459 and 1017013458 can al be deleted - they have the wrong rolls anyway and can be replaced by ways 1017013452 and 1017013453 (gardens insid... commented 2026-03-26 06:03:51 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 159684835 (Comments: 1) | Vardion (Discussed changesets: 3) | It is a bit of a mess, insn't it! Relation 2724782 scrub is well and truly broken .. should it be deleted? Way: 1338514652 and Way: 1338953826 should be combined into one way... There are probably a lot more confused things here. commented 2026-03-26 05:42:22 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 180382217 (Comments: 1) | alexLuo1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | What is your source for the name here? I don't remember any signage --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180382217 commented 2026-03-25 23:46:02 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 180383341 (Comments: 1) | alexLuo1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't tag descriptions in the name field, it is for proper names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180380595 --- ... commented 2026-03-25 23:44:06 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 180233393 (Comments: 2) | Terry Gruijters (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your help. Still learning. I struggled trying to use the graphic interface only getting the right tags. It helped when I noticed the text entry option icon. The graphic interface only options just don't seem to allow correct designati... commented 2026-03-25 05:17:48 UTC by Terry Gruijters ♦1 |
| 180380595 (Comments: 1) | alexLuo1 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please don't tag descriptions in the name field, it is for proper names only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2026-03-24 23:46:12 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 131001117 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥_import (Discussed changesets: 29) | thanks boss 🫡 commented 2026-03-22 04:35:11 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 137370859 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Relation roles corrected commented 2026-03-21 03:53:53 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 137464827 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Relation roles corrected commented 2026-03-21 03:53:24 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 137442201 (Comments: 1) | vaibhavnz (Discussed changesets: 41) | Roles in relation 15980981 corrected. commented 2026-03-21 03:49:13 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 179849379 (Comments: 2) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks for this. commented 2026-03-20 00:47:58 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦10 |
| 179609274 (Comments: 1) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 14) | HI The roles in relation 20304766 are incorrect.. The outside has been given the role 'inner' and the inside has been given the role 'outer'. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=178.16222&lat... commented 2026-03-19 23:54:51 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 177245114 (Comments: 1) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, What feature is relation Rotorua Central Mall (20086689), v1 trying to map? An indoor corridor? A building? A shop? It is tagged for all 3 ... I think it should be mapping the shop=mall as Each building has ... commented 2026-03-19 23:35:53 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 180001400 (Comments: 1) | kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changing the name is not the correct way to handle stages of decay please look in to life cycle prefixes on the OSM wiki --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1800... commented 2026-03-17 23:45:22 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179860625 (Comments: 1) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 83) | thanks ian. these people are forced to contribute to OSM by their uni professor, so i've reverted the rest of the poor quality edits commented 2026-03-17 10:49:55 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179885648 (Comments: 1) | NeutralDisposition (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179981597 commented 2026-03-17 05:13:16 UTC by MappingMore ♦310 |
| 179737095 (Comments: 1) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | You appear to be tagging "Hills Hoist" washing lines as carpet hangers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179737095 commented 2026-03-17 00:14:36 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179914617 (Comments: 1) | Samreddy (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset appears to just be fantasy mapping/vandalism --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179914617 commented 2026-03-17 00:00:53 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179886909 (Comments: 1) | BlakeQin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not add a generic name to every object, the name field is for proper names only --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179886909 commented 2026-03-16 23:39:33 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179858240 (Comments: 2) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Additionally you created a park where one already was mapped an used the incorrect generic name "Park" --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179858240 |
| 179886519 (Comments: 2) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | You have also changed a bus stop to a cafe, leaving some of the bus stop tags amongst other errors. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179886519 commented 2026-03-16 23:21:45 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179888008 (Comments: 1) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset id: 179939592 commented 2026-03-16 09:42:02 UTC by ajmat ♦133 |
| 179586727 (Comments: 2) | DoubleA (Discussed changesets: 57) | I'll give you till this Friday to reply back, otherwise I'll revert it Saturday NZT. commented 2026-03-16 03:00:01 UTC by EleGlobe ♦12 |
| 179752279 (Comments: 1) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Revert of 179744094 commented 2026-03-15 09:03:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦310 |
| 179651605 (Comments: 2) | Logan Wowwee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, I have added pedestrian access. Cheers commented 2026-03-14 22:30:37 UTC by Logan Wowwee ♦1 |
| 179864300 (Comments: 2) | Pankoj_R (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position. commented 2026-03-14 16:17:00 UTC by iandees ♦1,121 |
| 179568312 (Comments: 1) | Ishraka (Discussed changesets: 1) | the bus stop at this location was already mapped, so I've deleted the one that you created commented 2026-03-13 10:11:26 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179556673 (Comments: 1) | Daweiiiii (Discussed changesets: 1) | is this forest really called 'Tree1'? that seems very unlikely commented 2026-03-13 10:10:46 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179728883 (Comments: 1) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | unfortunately I've had to revert all your changes. You've created a bus stop inside someone's house, which is clearly not correct commented 2026-03-13 09:49:57 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179729496 (Comments: 1) | Heena Nasit (Discussed changesets: 4) | this bus stop was already mapped, you created a new bus stop in exactly the same location commented 2026-03-13 09:47:55 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179734585 (Comments: 1) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | you created a postbox inside someone's private house, is this intentional? commented 2026-03-13 09:46:36 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179783320 (Comments: 1) | Puja_Pandit (Discussed changesets: 4) | is this really a carpet hanger? Carpet hangers are extremely rare in NZ, they only exist in Russia and ex-soviet countries commented 2026-03-13 09:43:24 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179723595 (Comments: 1) | Sandar Lynn (Discussed changesets: 3) | the kindergarten was already mapped. you've drawn a new area on top of the existing area, so i've deleted it commented 2026-03-13 09:41:13 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179790382 (Comments: 1) | Sandar Lynn (Discussed changesets: 3) | you've drawn a road on top of an existing road, which is not valid. Please don't ignore the errors in the editor. commented 2026-03-13 09:38:15 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179788849 (Comments: 1) | Sandar Lynn (Discussed changesets: 3) | please don't ignore the errors in the editor. If it shows a mistake, you should fix it commented 2026-03-13 09:37:05 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179753085 (Comments: 1) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Revert of 179725738 commented 2026-03-12 17:20:14 UTC by MappingMore ♦310 |
| 179756197 (Comments: 1) | mapnerd🤓 (Discussed changesets: 20) | ignore review_requested, accidentally misclicked commented 2026-03-12 12:34:58 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦10 |
| 179729321 (Comments: 2) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Bao, would like to know why landuse has been set to garages instead of landuse=grass? commented 2026-03-12 11:14:25 UTC by mapnerd🤓 ♦10 |
| 179570900 (Comments: 1) | Xiaotao_Wu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM - A few mistakes in these early edits... the name and shortname are not required as this information is in the address fields - name=4/13 Rengarenga Rise short_name=4/13 house Maybe also consider joining the OSM World dis... commented 2026-03-12 10:57:29 UTC by tastrax ♦1,201 |
| 179743574 (Comments: 2) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://discord.gg/openstreetmap commented 2026-03-12 10:48:58 UTC by tastrax ♦1,201 |
| 179742096 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This parking area does not need this name unless that is signposted somewhere at the location commented 2026-03-12 10:42:20 UTC by tastrax ♦1,201 |
| 179726196 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This lamp does not need a name. Description should also be information that you want to tell the map user about the object, rather than telling the world its your Uni home activity. commented 2026-03-12 10:40:28 UTC by tastrax ♦1,201 |
| 179725738 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This driveway doesnt need a name unless its signposted as such. It should also be connected to Glamorgan Drive commented 2026-03-12 10:37:18 UTC by tastrax ♦1,201 |
| 179729554 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This private parking area does not need a name unless signposted as such. commented 2026-03-12 10:35:28 UTC by tastrax ♦1,201 |
| 179725235 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | Welcome to OSM - This name on the street lighting is not required unless signed as such (which I doubt it is). If it has some reference number showing on the pole then it can have a ref key with the value (ie ref-1234B) commented 2026-03-12 10:33:01 UTC by tastrax ♦1,201 |
| 179729470 (Comments: 1) | BaoChang (Discussed changesets: 8) | This driveway should be highway=service service=driveway and no name unless its signposted as 'cb driveway' commented 2026-03-12 10:29:16 UTC by tastrax ♦1,201 |
| 171381614 (Comments: 2) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 14) | Further the multipoluygon should not share segments on the outer ways. In this case I have deleted the relation . Combined the 2 ways into one way and placed the tags on that way. commented 2026-03-12 04:05:08 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 179556695 (Comments: 1) | Houda568 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The name field is for real names only, not descriptions like "New houses are being built". Also building=house is for individual houses not a development area of multiple houses --- Published u... commented 2026-03-09 06:04:11 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179561665 (Comments: 1) | George_ZJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | You have connected the driveway to the footpath to the road which means it is unusable for vehicle routing --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179561665 commented 2026-03-09 06:01:23 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179558815 (Comments: 1) | lee_bei (Discussed changesets: 1) | You have changed the name and website but left the email, phone and operator unchanged, are these still correct? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179558815 commented 2026-03-09 05:58:41 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 179554144 (Comments: 2) | Danielle- (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have reverted the changeset --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179554144 commented 2026-03-09 03:24:19 UTC by CoyKoi ♦235 |
| 179556465 (Comments: 1) | Gracey13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, I have reviewed your changeset. These are good additions, thank you. I do have two points of feedback: Firstly, you have added an amenity=post_box but I think it's meant to be amenity=letter_box. You can read the distinction on O... commented 2026-03-09 03:06:58 UTC by CoyKoi ♦235 |
| 179518097 (Comments: 1) | KTT-NZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome. This changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks! commented 2026-03-08 11:59:27 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,210 |
| 166797454 (Comments: 1) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 14) | Relation deleted - shared segments, no roles Made simple way that includes surrounds and tagged that as community centre (no building tag as those are on the actual buildings) commented 2026-03-07 23:05:29 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 179376365 (Comments: 1) | kmaj008 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Revert of 179429774 commented 2026-03-06 07:18:07 UTC by 007Transformer ♦68 |
| 179373094 (Comments: 1) | theGradyConnell (Discussed changesets: 9) | thanks for all your edits! not sure if you're aware, but mapping details of bus depots somewhat helps AT's staff, since their software seems to use OpenStreetMap as a basemap - see timecode 00:10 in this video: https://facebook.com/reel/78... commented 2026-03-05 12:20:49 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179373891 (Comments: 1) | Warin61 (Discussed changesets: 162) | Changeset comment should be Resolve 'Moore Guy' from relation into simple way. Source - OSMInspector, OSM, bing commented 2026-03-05 00:34:32 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 178968052 (Comments: 2) | Little Yellow Bird (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179332531 (Restore previous tags) commented 2026-03-04 05:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,654 |
| 178968064 (Comments: 2) | Little Yellow Bird (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179048693 commented 2026-03-04 05:33:23 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,381 |
| 179250624 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 140) | sure, done commented 2026-03-03 10:41:57 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179250890 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 140) | Yay! Looks like it complies with 'the rules'. commented 2026-03-02 23:41:13 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 179161351 (Comments: 3) | AmineAusAlbuquerque (Discussed changesets: 2) | aah, got it. yeah the east side of the road is also private! :) commented 2026-03-02 12:17:18 UTC by AmineAusAlbuquerque ♦2 |
| 151169089 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 140) | whoops, yeah this was totally broken. changed to a simple multipolygon: relation/17558978 commented 2026-03-02 11:53:19 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 173296133 (Comments: 2) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 16) | the linked wikidata entry answers this question with a surprisingly detailed answer. so i've restored the relation commented 2026-03-02 11:46:55 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179063445 (Comments: 1) | Mortein (Discussed changesets: 3) | heya, shall we delete it then? this would be more suitable for https://openhistoricalmap.org commented 2026-03-02 11:43:11 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 179138761 (Comments: 2) | aleph_null (Discussed changesets: 9) | The polygon should be fixed now, sorry about that! commented 2026-03-02 10:33:20 UTC by aleph_null ♦20 |
| 177714931 (Comments: 2) | jepee (Discussed changesets: 24) | 14 days no response. commented 2026-03-02 06:46:53 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 179198542 (Comments: 1) | gullwstravels (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Relation 20274479 - heath has a problem Outer ways cannot share segments. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=169.37918&lat=-45.19754&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_n... commented 2026-03-02 06:37:32 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 170281222 (Comments: 1) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 16) | Name is for name only, not a description eg 'Terrace Houses'. Relation 19448184 deleted - shared segments. commented 2026-03-02 01:08:35 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 175602552 (Comments: 1) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 16) | Deleted relation 19927055 - 2 members both inners. commented 2026-02-28 22:44:09 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 178848599 (Comments: 2) | so-rose (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi ❤️🔥, sorry for the confusion. I didn't read the Vespucci manual well enough - still getting used to the workflows. Appreciate the heads-up. In this case I went for a guided hike on Pigeon island, and did a GPS track of one ... commented 2026-02-26 10:30:31 UTC by so-rose ♦1 |
| 169367985 (Comments: 4) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 16) | In this case there is only one mapped way around the whole thing ... with all of the tags on that. No relation. If the individual segments require separation then add separate ways as building:part. Still no relation. commented 2026-02-26 06:55:41 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 179014992 (Comments: 4) | jaybomb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Additionally these outlines are close to but not quite square whereas most buildings in NZ have largely 90 degree corners. Please use the Square option (short cut S) in the ID editor --- Published using ... commented 2026-02-25 17:53:35 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 178924737 (Comments: 1) | blandchipsss (Discussed changesets: 4) | another tip: after drawing an area, you can press Q on your keyboard to 'square' the building, so that it's a proper rectangle shape commented 2026-02-25 08:52:44 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 178932236 (Comments: 2) | blandchipsss (Discussed changesets: 4) | please use changeset comments to describe your edits. It looks like you deleted a number of important tags and changed the university to a high school. Without no changeset comment or explanation, it is likely that someone will just revert st... commented 2026-02-25 08:49:53 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 174224213 (Comments: 1) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 16) | Relation relation 19795228 deleted - conflicts with address nodes. separation of buildings only has role 'inners'. commented 2026-02-24 23:47:32 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 169590041 (Comments: 1) | bjankuloski (Discussed changesets: 16) | These are ONLY buildings. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard "An area of land WITH farm buildings" Secondly the name of the farm should be placed on the total area of the farm not just the build... commented 2026-02-22 23:14:59 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 178904286 (Comments: 1) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 14) | I forgot to say 1A instead of 1PO which is also displayed, & presumed alt name. commented 2026-02-22 15:47:59 UTC by EleGlobe ♦12 |
| 178842087 (Comments: 1) | blandchipsss (Discussed changesets: 4) | Please use changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-02-22 04:07:47 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 178015595 (Comments: 1) | jepee (Discussed changesets: 24) | Relation 20165239 ... deleted. A RELATION is NOT needed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Simply tag the ways. commented 2026-02-20 23:43:39 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 128020389 (Comments: 1) | R_Schicker (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is NOT the way to make multipolygon relations! commented 2026-02-20 23:26:13 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 177814561 (Comments: 1) | jepee (Discussed changesets: 24) | Part revert commented 2026-02-18 08:36:37 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 177842144 (Comments: 1) | jepee (Discussed changesets: 24) | Part revert. commented 2026-02-18 08:25:04 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 178586359 (Comments: 2) | jepee (Discussed changesets: 24) | Additionally you are using the same changeset comment on every change, please use descriptive changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments commented 2026-02-17 23:43:21 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 178124135 (Comments: 1) | Retrorocket (Discussed changesets: 1) | can you please add changeset comments in the future? thanks! commented 2026-02-17 21:47:58 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦50 |
| 178495140 (Comments: 1) | EleGlobe (Discussed changesets: 14) | Also removed old Bus Route that was previously Route 13 Napier =>Napier (via Taradale and Taradale) before the new Bus Route Changes. commented 2026-02-13 09:57:54 UTC by EleGlobe ♦12 |
| 165762526 (Comments: 3) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 140) | And thanks both for mapping and for a fix! commented 2026-02-11 14:33:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,724 |
| 162697956 (Comments: 2) | catgirlseraid (Discussed changesets: 37) | Thanks for noticing that! After doing a little research I must have accidetally added the wrong name as that relates to some form of music department. Should be fixed now. commented 2026-02-11 10:01:53 UTC by catgirlseraid ♦50 |
| 177134419 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥_import (Discussed changesets: 29) | thanks, this one fixed as well commented 2026-02-11 09:18:09 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 143961416 (Comments: 2) | JacksonDavey (Discussed changesets: 8) | No communication. commented 2026-02-11 02:08:34 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 174977805 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥_import (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi Warin, thanks your recent comments. All the multipolygon issues should be fixed now. And cheers for fixing the massive broken forest. I'll check back once the validator has updated also as an FYI, I'm working on improvements to iD... commented 2026-02-10 11:24:08 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 149340024 (Comments: 1) | Prosperosity (Discussed changesets: 14) | HI Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. So the relation has been deleted. The 3 buildings are now tagged building:part=yes A new way mapping the 3 buildings foot print has been created with the Sargood Centre tags. commented 2026-02-09 00:46:47 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 178255646 (Comments: 1) | Warin61 (Discussed changesets: 162) | Source - should add LINZ Imagery for area. commented 2026-02-08 08:25:16 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 163677826 (Comments: 1) | shannaxia33 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12669610501/history has shop = 2_dollar_shop that was added in this edit Is it shop=variety_store ? If not, how it differs from shop=variety_store? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=variety_... commented 2026-02-08 02:23:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,724 |
| 177049701 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥_import (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi The relation 20065830 Conservation Area - Stevens Wildlife Area is not closed. commented 2026-02-08 01:46:09 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 168581404 (Comments: 1) | BholeKiBhasam (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi, Comment? It looks to me like your trying to replace tree relations with tree ways. In this changeset relation 19329027 is some 243 km north to south while you r new way1412902847 is 3 km north to south and is almost fully contained in ... commented 2026-02-08 01:35:02 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 175800747 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥_import (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi Relation 19949406 is not closed. The import has remove some 300 nodes from this relation. Error? commented 2026-02-07 01:30:39 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 178122489 (Comments: 2) | Whitireia and WelTec (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think the following created relation may has introduced some issues: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20173719 Best regards, Pascal commented 2026-02-05 08:53:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,210 |
| 116167491 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 140) | Not all of Mount White Station is a meadow. commented 2026-02-05 02:59:21 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 155759687 (Comments: 1) | JacksonDavey (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi The relation 16692137 pedestrian .. that is not the way it is done. This has shared segments on the outer ways... There should be an outer way or more than one. But they should not share segments. Then there can be inner ways to make ho... commented 2026-02-05 01:49:08 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 161191883 (Comments: 1) | mannux (Discussed changesets: 3) | HI The guide is one feature = one OSM entry So one way for the roof, layer=1 and another way for the hall? I have deleted the relation and tagged the outer way for the building footprint. commented 2026-02-05 01:16:07 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 178027118 (Comments: 1) | oolaurence (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Relation 18972979 McLeans Island is now broken .... commented 2026-02-04 03:04:26 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 177322598 (Comments: 2) | ❤️🔥_import (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi Andy, these riverbanks/islands change after every flood, and I guess DOC doesn't update the legal boundaries when that happens, which is why we get such a mismatch. I've merged these boundaries together now to keep this area mor... commented 2026-02-03 22:59:28 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 177995916 (Comments: 1) | Sucl (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, what are you trying to achieve with these edits? if you ignore those validator warnings, it creates an enourmous mess that someone will probably revert. we don't map each individual lane as a lane, the previous layout was alr... commented 2026-02-02 08:51:04 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 169987280 (Comments: 6) | NyanSten (Discussed changesets: 59) | Hi, I don't think it issues fines. You're right, it should be a speed_display. commented 2026-02-02 07:18:42 UTC by NyanSten ♦45 |
| 176587878 (Comments: 1) | jepee (Discussed changesets: 24) | you changed the entire 600km² forest (https://osm.org/relation/2891664 ) into scrub - is that intentional? commented 2026-01-28 04:29:24 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 115742018 (Comments: 1) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 140) | Multipolygon outer way cannot share segments... See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=172.54630&lat=-43.48947&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segmen... commented 2026-01-28 03:44:05 UTC by Warin61 ♦2,784 |
| 177746121 (Comments: 4) | Numbergod (Discussed changesets: 23) | No worries. You're obviously more familiar with it than me. I'll stick it on my list of things to investigate next time I'm passing. commented 2026-01-27 06:46:59 UTC by Numbergod ♦11 |
| 177558583 (Comments: 1) | MartinBook (Discussed changesets: 4) | thanks for these edits, this is the new trail that's opening next week right? commented 2026-01-22 12:01:34 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |
| 177553826 (Comments: 5) | MartinBook (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello Martin, I'm sorry, but we do not delete objects that are present on the ground. It doesn't really matter to us who mapped them or where that person came from. Given that the woods, streams, and paths you deleted are pl... commented 2026-01-22 09:13:59 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,614 |
| 177553751 (Comments: 4) | MartinBook (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Taya, Thanks for your email. Under NZ health and safety laws, if someone hurts themselves while walking on my land, even if uninvited, then I am liable. We've had people coming onto our land because of these tracks. The person who mapped t... commented 2026-01-22 09:00:37 UTC by MartinBook ♦3 |
| 177553685 (Comments: 2) | MartinBook (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Taya, Thanks for your email. Under NZ health and safety laws, if someone hurts themselves while walking on my land, even if uninvited, then I am liable. We've had people coming onto our land because of these tracks. The person who mapped t... commented 2026-01-22 09:00:14 UTC by MartinBook ♦3 |
| 177539545 (Comments: 1) | Abgr7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions. Two points: please use meaningful changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and please include the country code in phone numbers as per https://wiki.ope... commented 2026-01-22 00:32:40 UTC by ralley ♦645 |
| 177462452 (Comments: 1) | markbegbie (Discussed changesets: 18) | Comment error. Actually modifying residential landuse polygon. commented 2026-01-20 08:00:21 UTC by markbegbie ♦30 |
| 176883060 (Comments: 1) | Kelerei (Discussed changesets: 6) | heya, nice work adding all these details ! do you have any thoughts on the tagging scheme itself? (https://osm.wiki/New_Zealand/Railways) I asked for feedback in a bunch of OSM forums, and got heaps of comments from Germans, Australians, etc. ... commented 2026-01-14 12:15:20 UTC by ❤️🔥 ♦474 |