| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 179103285 (Comments: 2) | NKA (Discussed changesets: 145) | Thanks commented 2026-02-28 06:16:30 UTC by NKA ♦254 |
| 179146602 (Comments: 1) | Fl4k76 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej Tänkte bara kolla om du även kollade tunnelbaneplanet, då kiosken var taggad med level=-1 commented 2026-02-27 20:16:13 UTC by Snusmumriken ♦155 |
| 170356912 (Comments: 1) | Reitstoen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello Is this really a path? It crosses a marsch with no sign of any path from the aerial photos (which of course could be out of date). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421834993 commented 2026-02-27 15:31:52 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦636 |
| 176185937 (Comments: 3) | Michael Axlin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Readded. However. I don't understand why it isn't enough with speed on the road. I mean, you don't put speed tags on land next to a big road to cover the case if gps jump...!?! commented 2026-02-27 12:31:13 UTC by YraFyra ♦56 |
| 178668457 (Comments: 2) | Jesper Songer (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/178669254 commented 2026-02-25 17:33:07 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,101 |
| 179000000 (Comments: 1) | Andreasl01 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 179 mil woo commented 2026-02-24 18:30:35 UTC by kylor ♦29 |
| 178733806 (Comments: 5) | salgo60 (Discussed changesets: 20) | Stort tack.... commented 2026-02-22 12:21:12 UTC by salgo60 ♦15 |
| 178727433 (Comments: 1) | idk what to do bc im bored (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted petty vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178728020 commented 2026-02-18 14:11:25 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,401 |
| 178355758 (Comments: 1) | JBHall (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what does "stop_point" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place. I suspect 'ref' or some 'ref:XYZ' would be appropriate. commented 2026-02-15 11:18:10 UTC by mueschel ♦6,935 |
| 178522534 (Comments: 3) | Snusmumriken (Discussed changesets: 43) | Sorry, it wasn't you - the tag was added here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178355758 commented 2026-02-15 11:17:47 UTC by mueschel ♦6,935 |
| 178320010 (Comments: 3) | wombatmaper (Discussed changesets: 41) | Thanks for fixing this and for improving the map! commented 2026-02-11 15:52:30 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦636 |
| 178042766 (Comments: 1) | timmyBird (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ändra inte path med foot=designated och bicycle=designated till cycleway. Cycleway är för när det endast är skyltat som cykelbana, dvs inte GC-bana. commented 2026-02-05 16:45:51 UTC by maasa123 ♦16 |
| 60022941 (Comments: 2) | Essin (Discussed changesets: 24) | Should be colour commented 2026-02-05 15:29:08 UTC by Hidoo00 ♦80 |
| 178051684 (Comments: 4) | timmyBird (Discussed changesets: 2) | Märkligt nog är det ingen som försöker rutta mig genom övergången 250-300 m längre västerut som hade varit kortare. Jag har svårt att förstå skillnaden. commented 2026-02-05 09:10:39 UTC by timmyBird ♦1 |
| 177890205 (Comments: 7) | bobbyxng (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm sorry if I'm sounding a bit harsch, that's not my intention. I'm not able to find the source now. I did read a lot of information for upgrades of the power lines/stations but it was some years ago. I see now that the OS... commented 2026-02-04 22:04:58 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦636 |
| 177721220 (Comments: 1) | Colorful_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Really cool changeset! commented 2026-02-04 13:31:49 UTC by automotive_guy ♦1 |
| 177962559 (Comments: 1) | Fjellrev (Discussed changesets: 4) | snyggt! commented 2026-02-01 15:21:15 UTC by pangoSE ♦412 |
| 109297700 (Comments: 1) | Mathy77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hej. Du har satt "bicycle=no" och "horse=no" på en eller flera vägar här. Vad baseras det på? Enligt allemansrätten får man generellt cykla på alla vägar, inklusive enskilda. Mvh commented 2026-01-31 12:50:11 UTC by ChristianA ♦45 |
| 177801397 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 936) | In my opinion yes, but if you look at the tag statistics both b7 and diesel_b7 are used almost equally often. commented 2026-01-28 23:05:51 UTC by mueschel ♦6,935 |
| 176947693 (Comments: 3) | toponymia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Jag ändrar i enlighet med ditt förslag. commented 2026-01-26 23:18:37 UTC by Tooga ♦10 |
| 177738198 (Comments: 1) | Spunken (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Spunken, thank you for your contribution. I believe you accidentally moved this parking lane and connected it with bäckeskogstgatan. This seems like a mistake and I have reverted it. Please use more descriptive changeset comments ... commented 2026-01-26 21:23:46 UTC by wombatmaper ♦90 |
| 177589788 (Comments: 1) | toponymia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you added "addr:postnumber" here which seems to be a mistake and should be "addr:postcode"? commented 2026-01-25 11:31:39 UTC by mueschel ♦6,935 |
| 166289084 (Comments: 2) | 007Transformer (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Hidoo00, You are absolutely right! Thank you for checking and letting me know about my mix-up. I have made the corrections on the date format. I appreciate your kind support. I’ll be more aware in my future edits. commented 2026-01-21 08:41:16 UTC by 007Transformer ♦24 |
| 176978847 (Comments: 2) | Birger Canerstam (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hej igen! Hur var det med dessa vägar? Får man verkligen inte vistas på dom? commented 2026-01-20 00:22:52 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦636 |
| 177299830 (Comments: 4) | T med ett g (Discussed changesets: 3) | Inte superpetigt, det räcker med typ "according to local laws" eller "Transportstyrelsen RDT" eller liknande. Det viktiga med källhänvisningen/ändringskommentaren är för att kunna upptäcka nä... commented 2026-01-19 15:30:48 UTC by Hidoo00 ♦80 |
| 177097696 (Comments: 4) | T med ett g (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_valhalla_bicycle&route=57.736715%2C12.975465%3B57.74314%2C12.978716#map=16/57.73905/12.97354&layers=D commented 2026-01-19 15:20:26 UTC by T med ett g ♦4 |
| 177226995 (Comments: 2) | UliFR (Discussed changesets: 41) | Hello, you made a ginormous edit spaning half of Europe with like 20 edits. Next time try to keep the edit localized, not on two different spots commented 2026-01-15 18:43:59 UTC by Ondřej Lopatka ♦27 |
| 177240935 (Comments: 2) | Peuxy (Discussed changesets: 3) | To clarify, this is a work in progress. commented 2026-01-15 00:51:21 UTC by Peuxy ♦5 |
| 177131452 (Comments: 1) | Yann Vernier (Discussed changesets: 1) | I was confused about the portion referenced in StreetComplete. These little bits aren't separate houses but valves in conjoined houses; they have no external doors of their own. commented 2026-01-12 17:52:00 UTC by Yann Vernier ♦1 |
| 177002182 (Comments: 3) | Johand199 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177114830 :D commented 2026-01-11 21:55:00 UTC by Johand199 ♦2 |
| 177043177 (Comments: 3) | simer_lkpg (Discussed changesets: 5) | Den är vakant. commented 2026-01-11 16:56:14 UTC by lotug ♦2 |
| 177037994 (Comments: 2) | Spunken (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted node move in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177096409 commented 2026-01-11 13:39:18 UTC by leojth ♦31 |
| 176736550 (Comments: 5) | archie (Discussed changesets: 292) | Efter mer grävning ser jag att det är just när motor_vehicles=no, som man specifikt måste säga att fast cykel är ok för vissa routing algoritmer. Jag kommer gå över ett större område och uppda... commented 2026-01-11 13:26:42 UTC by T med ett g ♦4 |
| 159890679 (Comments: 3) | ChristianA (Discussed changesets: 25) | The other user created their copy one day before you, maybe just unlucky and had outdated data downloaded? commented 2026-01-08 09:08:19 UTC by wombatmaper ♦90 |
| 176921719 (Comments: 1) | mbr-g (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ändrade fel busslinje och vet inte om eller hur man kan göra en "rollback" så kommer rerouta tillbaka den till rätt position commented 2026-01-06 22:30:17 UTC by mbr-g ♦1 |
| 176847443 (Comments: 3) | jsn4625 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tackar! commented 2026-01-05 21:39:21 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦636 |
| 176870578 (Comments: 2) | Brickblock1 (Discussed changesets: 5) | The only error that is given by the validator is because I merged all of TC into one stop area. The validator should be updated to match since this reflects the on the ground reality better than the old tagging. Regarding the stop area groups ... commented 2026-01-05 18:36:46 UTC by Brickblock1 ♦17 |
| 174344445 (Comments: 1) | archie (Discussed changesets: 292) | OSM routar bilar på vägen, trots att den inte är öppen för motortrafik (och har en bom! fast bommen är ju inte med i kartan). Samtidigt routas fotgängare och cyklister på omvägar längs skogsstigar f... commented 2026-01-02 09:41:54 UTC by arvidma ♦1 |
| 176590316 (Comments: 5) | Yukiroshi (Discussed changesets: 31) | Also there is two different tags, both very poorly documented commented 2025-12-31 07:37:24 UTC by Yukiroshi ♦42 |
| 173581203 (Comments: 1) | jphoenix11 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Även om den inte fastställts på metern när, är det hyfsat klart var banan ska gå och jag ser ingen anledning till varför den informationen inte ska kunna vara med på kartan. commented 2025-12-27 20:18:51 UTC by Fyris ♦2 |
| 171096866 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import (Discussed changesets: 2463) | Sorry! This edit was incorrectly performed - changesets tags are partially wrong, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087 This import was subsequently approved, se... commented 2025-12-26 06:55:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import ♦2,445 |
| 171096870 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import (Discussed changesets: 2463) | Sorry! This edit was incorrectly performed - changesets tags are partially wrong, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087 This import was subsequently approved, se... commented 2025-12-26 06:54:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import ♦2,445 |
| 171096874 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import (Discussed changesets: 2463) | Sorry! This edit was incorrectly performed - changesets tags are partially wrong, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087 This import was subsequently approved, se... commented 2025-12-26 06:53:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import ♦2,445 |
| 171096876 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import (Discussed changesets: 2463) | Sorry! This edit was incorrectly performed - changesets tags are partially wrong, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087 This import was subsequently approved, se... commented 2025-12-26 06:52:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import ♦2,445 |
| 171096877 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import (Discussed changesets: 2463) | Sorry! This edit was incorrectly performed - changesets tags are partially wrong, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087 This import was subsequently approved, se... commented 2025-12-26 06:51:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import ♦2,445 |
| 171096879 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import (Discussed changesets: 2463) | Sorry! This edit was incorrectly performed - changesets tags are partially wrong, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087 This import was subsequently approved, se... commented 2025-12-26 06:50:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import ♦2,445 |
| 171096881 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import (Discussed changesets: 2463) | Sorry! This edit was incorrectly performed - changesets tags are partially wrong, see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/sorry-for-a-bot-edit-escaping-its-supposed-borders-adding-website-tags/135087 This import was subsequently approved, se... commented 2025-12-26 06:49:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny - bot account - ATP import ♦2,445 |
| 176285779 (Comments: 3) | TheDJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | For reference to others, the OSM relation in question is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17973382 and discussion started at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17973382/history/6 commented 2025-12-23 11:58:54 UTC by TheDJ ♦1 |
| 158269974 (Comments: 1) | Torgau2020 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Who got the brilliant idea to remove the old relation which had a wikidata tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174647646 and not link it in this new one? commented 2025-12-22 23:09:04 UTC by HuggeK ♦3 |
| 176143916 (Comments: 1) | T med ett g (Discussed changesets: 3) | New to editing. Should the adress be added separately on Bergskroken 3? commented 2025-12-19 14:50:38 UTC by T med ett g ♦4 |
| 161302745 (Comments: 1) | the_battledroid (Discussed changesets: 3) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1350871871/history what was meant by tourism=church ? that it is a tourism attraction? commented 2025-12-18 05:51:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 176056213 (Comments: 2) | Aerond (Discussed changesets: 49) | Oj, måste blivit fel tag när den skapades. Fixat nu, tack för infon. commented 2025-12-18 04:51:54 UTC by Aerond ♦68 |
| 175903637 (Comments: 1) | GumUlf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hej! Är det diken eller bäckar? I skogen ser det ut som bäckar som slingrar sig, men jag har aldrig sett dom med egna ögon, så du vet garanterat bättre. commented 2025-12-14 22:42:01 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦636 |
| 138621227 (Comments: 2) | thumbsup (Discussed changesets: 4) | Sorry, yes that was by 99% supposed to be grass. commented 2025-12-14 18:00:16 UTC by thumbsup ♦3 |
| 137644183 (Comments: 3) | Lynx86 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I missed your comment when you wrote it. If I remember correctly I adjusted after cycling it and following markers along the route. I will try to answer quicker in the future! commented 2025-12-14 00:51:53 UTC by Lynx86 ♦2 |
| 175324976 (Comments: 1) | Hovastro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Hovastro! Please don't use natural=* with multiple values, such as natural=coastline;bare_rock. Do map bare rock, gravel, sand or other such areas as separate elements, otherwise islets will not be renderered. https://www.openstreetmap... commented 2025-12-13 15:41:37 UTC by Something B ♦149 |
| 159132142 (Comments: 1) | Lucas Liebler (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12339421585/history has amenity = convenience that was added in this edit What was meant by amenity=convenience? Is it a convenience shop? Then shop=convenience is likely a better tagging, see https://wiki... commented 2025-12-11 16:56:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 175810226 (Comments: 1) | Nadja15 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revertad. De har fortfarande lokaler här med. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175810803 commented 2025-12-11 16:24:01 UTC by Nadja15 ♦17 |
| 175733958 (Comments: 2) | GumUlf (Discussed changesets: 2) | Tack för tipset Anders! commented 2025-12-10 01:38:48 UTC by GumUlf ♦1 |
| 175614682 (Comments: 3) | Lysol90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Tack för svar och snabb ändring! commented 2025-12-07 22:29:44 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦636 |
| 168372819 (Comments: 2) | larsdahlin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Have changed osm.org/node/12967280400/history . It was the effect in the charging pole. commented 2025-12-07 20:00:13 UTC by larsdahlin ♦1 |
| 168251795 (Comments: 1) | Andy6325 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12960570334/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 156098641 (Comments: 1) | Daniel Heimburgg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12151592164/history has power = 22 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means commented 2025-12-07 19:36:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 127962974 (Comments: 2) | torger (Discussed changesets: 7) | As I said in the last of these values you commented, there was an import error for NVDB data at a period when lots of data was imported. The number is "correct", but has a tail of garbage decimals. I have rounded it to 4.8 now. If you see m... commented 2025-12-07 13:29:19 UTC by torger ♦13 |
| 162714534 (Comments: 1) | Hidoo00 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12601657140/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 23:59:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 175538712 (Comments: 4) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 591) | Thanks for your reply, admitting to, and quickly fixing your error! I want to thank you as well for the work you do in increasing the data quality. commented 2025-12-05 22:53:55 UTC by AndersAndersson ♦636 |
| 175538686 (Comments: 5) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 591) | it seems so, but if I find myself completely mistaken I prefer to map something else after reverting myself. commented 2025-12-05 20:56:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,532 |
| 123333135 (Comments: 2) | Christian Nilsson (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. You are correct, that was the intention here. Thank you for discovering it. commented 2025-12-05 11:47:47 UTC by Christian Nilsson ♦1 |
| 172008808 (Comments: 1) | archie (Discussed changesets: 292) | Archie, why do you keep removing the oneway tag here? Is it not correct? Please discuss this with your fellow editors instead of engaging in edit wars. commented 2025-12-04 12:34:20 UTC by wombatmaper ♦90 |
| 175459990 (Comments: 1) | DanBikeSwe (Discussed changesets: 2) | WTF commented 2025-12-03 19:02:33 UTC by DanBikeSwe ♦3 |