| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 171947153 (Comments: 1) | Dogtopia of Columbus-Downtown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-09-15 06:21:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,630 |
| 171941760 (Comments: 1) | Sooperstar (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! What kind of business is Jiffy Lube? commented 2025-09-15 06:10:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171946501 (Comments: 1) | tguen (Discussed changesets: 32) | thank you! commented 2025-09-15 06:09:09 UTC by chath_tsu ♦6 |
| 171938094 (Comments: 1) | g4sPHiend (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Did you see the dopg park https://www.osm.org/way/737396261. Which opening_hours is correct? commented 2025-09-15 06:03:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171940624 (Comments: 1) | HazelLily1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes (by https://www.osm.org/changeset/171946433). Your business isn't part of a river. commented 2025-09-15 05:56:26 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171945516 (Comments: 1) | theortegafirm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-09-15 05:21:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,630 |
| 171843924 (Comments: 4) | SpeedMcCool (Discussed changesets: 9) | UnusualWorld, I am seeing this for the first time, and it is clear from this comment that you do not understand what tag I was adding. Please, revert your reversion and I will do my best to ensure future changesets do not span large areas (which, as ... commented 2025-09-15 04:50:33 UTC by SpeedMcCool ♦15 |
| 171855452 (Comments: 4) | UnusualWorld (Discussed changesets: 6) | The tag being updated was not "wikidata" but rather "name:etymology:wikidata". Therefore, the linked entity should be the namesake of the feature rather than the feature itself. The only example you gave of incorrect data was &quo... commented 2025-09-15 04:12:04 UTC by Gabe DeFreitas ♦8 |
| 171944070 (Comments: 1) | Ryan Watern (Discussed changesets: 15) | Not sure how "for bridge" got added lol but its tags for the construction site. commented 2025-09-15 04:07:10 UTC by Ryan Watern ♦7 |
| 171752992 (Comments: 1) | aspoon (Discussed changesets: 2) | Cycle lanes that are part of the road should be mapped using the cycleway=lane tag, not mapped as separate cycleways disconnected from the road. Additionally, shared use paths should replace any existing sidewalks/footways, not be mapped separate fro... commented 2025-09-15 00:01:16 UTC by jake_penguins ♦7 |
| 171803434 (Comments: 1) | Shuuk Ollie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for contributing. Try not to delete roads/paths/buildings that still exist on the ground. Instead change access and other tags and other tags to prevent routing through them. It's a common mistake. I have resolved the is... commented 2025-09-14 20:26:53 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦81 |
| 171904279 (Comments: 1) | Richardt59 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The name of the node seems to point to a legal requirement to protect eagles but not a specific area. See https://www.fws.gov/law/bald-and-golden-eagle-protection-act Can you review this edit to determine if the node should be in OSM? We only ... commented 2025-09-14 19:46:17 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171329176 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 64) | Okay, I've since downgraded it (and portions of Hughes Park Drive) back to primary. Thanks! commented 2025-09-14 17:44:57 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦79 |
| 171860041 (Comments: 4) | PoppaShell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ah, good to know. And yes, that is unfortunate, as I also assume the permissible sources will be too dated to keep up with the adoption pace of Flock and other ALPR/surveillance cameras out there. But I will survey those permissible sources to check ... commented 2025-09-14 16:29:14 UTC by PoppaShell ♦1 |
| 171531607 (Comments: 3) | James pand (Discussed changesets: 1) | yes i'll review it commented 2025-09-14 16:24:01 UTC by James pand ♦1 |
| 171925656 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 376) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes with https://www.osm.org/changeset/171925656. commented 2025-09-14 16:05:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171922893 (Comments: 1) | CyberCatBlues (Discussed changesets: 1) | And by doing it right, I am replacing the nodes with actual building areas, so I wanted to make sure the addresses would still show up. So far, looks good. commented 2025-09-14 15:09:48 UTC by CyberCatBlues ♦1 |
| 171814702 (Comments: 2) | Paul Schuchard - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171832621 commented 2025-09-14 08:44:35 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171819835 (Comments: 2) | Bodyrevivalnp (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171832536 commented 2025-09-14 08:43:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171820751 (Comments: 2) | phillipsconnect (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905579 commented 2025-09-14 08:43:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171823486 (Comments: 2) | Rich Plack - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171832318 commented 2025-09-14 08:42:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171830043 (Comments: 2) | Edgewater Dental Arts (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171832078 commented 2025-09-14 08:42:09 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171858591 (Comments: 2) | Terry Sparks - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171862507 commented 2025-09-14 08:40:13 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171875029 (Comments: 2) | James Lewis Electrical (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171876797 commented 2025-09-14 08:39:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171887966 (Comments: 2) | Golden Shield Life Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905427 commented 2025-09-14 08:38:19 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171902615 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Fort Worth - Downtown (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171903415 commented 2025-09-14 08:37:12 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171728130 (Comments: 2) | Hyperion Home Remodel & Contracting (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/171905297 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-09-14 08:35:26 UTC by NeisRevert ♦239 |
| 171728996 (Comments: 2) | Doug White: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171733814 commented 2025-09-14 08:34:38 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171761866 (Comments: 3) | La Habra Concrete Corp (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905218 commented 2025-09-14 08:33:23 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171765604 (Comments: 2) | Laxmeesh Mike Nayak (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171768216 commented 2025-09-14 08:30:01 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171771035 (Comments: 2) | Gonzalo Duran (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905039 commented 2025-09-14 08:29:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171772980 (Comments: 2) | iykykloungenyc (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171905013 commented 2025-09-14 08:28:20 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171778190 (Comments: 3) | Jeremy Normand - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171781096 commented 2025-09-14 08:25:49 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171784656 (Comments: 2) | Alex Tsekhanovsky (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171792690 commented 2025-09-14 08:25:24 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171811379 (Comments: 3) | Saint Raphael Roofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171813160 commented 2025-09-14 08:24:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171668688 (Comments: 2) | advantagehpe (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171670670 commented 2025-09-14 08:23:35 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171669849 (Comments: 2) | advantagehpe (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171673053 commented 2025-09-14 08:23:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,135 |
| 171671194 (Comments: 2) | airwaydentalmore (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171673020 commented 2025-09-14 08:21:30 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171671241 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Davis (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171672927 commented 2025-09-14 08:21:00 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171673705 (Comments: 3) | oaktreeresidence (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171674827 commented 2025-09-14 08:19:56 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171675018 (Comments: 2) | Alexlucky0102 (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171686024 commented 2025-09-14 08:19:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171680955 (Comments: 2) | portcityfamilycosmeticdentistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171685632 commented 2025-09-14 08:17:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171714589 (Comments: 2) | premiervascularny (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171904635 commented 2025-09-14 08:16:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171719792 (Comments: 2) | ARCE NACARIO: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171720751 commented 2025-09-14 08:16:08 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171540431 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Bellevue (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171556214 commented 2025-09-14 08:12:08 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171554121 (Comments: 2) | Kawsar Hosain (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171574608 commented 2025-09-14 08:11:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171558106 (Comments: 2) | Kawsar Hosain (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171570913 commented 2025-09-14 08:10:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171576476 (Comments: 3) | Dogtopia of Columbus - Dublin (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171581420 commented 2025-09-14 08:10:22 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171576554 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Canton (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171581278 commented 2025-09-14 08:09:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171595684 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Chesterfield (Discussed changesets: 2) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171599401 commented 2025-09-14 08:08:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171599268 (Comments: 3) | Dogtopia of Carriage Crossing (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171615918 commented 2025-09-14 08:07:25 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171610206 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Dedhams (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171615826 commented 2025-09-14 08:06:38 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171616873 (Comments: 2) | afixsecurityguardservices (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171620072 commented 2025-09-14 08:06:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171653130 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Daybreak (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171654046 commented 2025-09-14 08:04:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171654143 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Cypress (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171745860 commented 2025-09-14 08:03:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171660838 (Comments: 2) | Dogtopia of Decatur (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171670840 commented 2025-09-14 08:02:59 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171664751 (Comments: 2) | drschinpharardentistry (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171670612 commented 2025-09-14 08:02:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171533602 (Comments: 1) | ZLima12 (Discussed changesets: 26) | Thank you for doing reverting this. commented 2025-09-14 06:34:10 UTC by Aeuri ♦2 |
| 171888500 (Comments: 1) | Rhamear (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi again! When you saved this changeset you added what's called a "node drag", where one of the nodes that was under your mouse while panning the map got moved accidentally. It's easy to do – especially in dense areas l... commented 2025-09-14 02:24:14 UTC by iandees ♦736 |
| 171897099 (Comments: 2) | cardboardBox (Discussed changesets: 1) | I thought it was being knocked down but whoops, just renovated. I put it back. commented 2025-09-14 01:58:22 UTC by cardboardBox ♦1 |
| 171602226 (Comments: 1) | MarkZhang2026 (Discussed changesets: 2) | hi there! its good practice to leave changeset comments so its more clear to other local editors what is changing. it can be simple like *added bicycle parking* , *added benches* , etc. Happy mapping! -Fen commented 2025-09-13 23:30:31 UTC by Fen <3 ♦6 |
| 171752702 (Comments: 1) | MangoTheCorgo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, I have reverted this changeset for the following reasons: 1. The renaming was only done for the alternative name, in which the renaming is partially complete, but causes discrepancies. 2. Name of the road was correctly labeled according... commented 2025-09-13 21:54:32 UTC by mewhenthe ♦5 |
| 171835421 (Comments: 2) | xman456 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thank you so much-i was a little confused. i dont see them on the map now. they are FLOCK cameras. commented 2025-09-13 20:08:59 UTC by xman456 ♦1 |
| 170416422 (Comments: 1) | cdevers (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please stop changing roads to prohibit foot traffic unless there is a legal restriction in place. commented 2025-09-13 20:06:53 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦119 |
| 171507003 (Comments: 1) | cdevers (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please stop changing roads to prohibit foot traffic unless there is a legal restriction in place. The presence of sidewalks already indicates pedestrian access, so edits should reflect official, verifiable rules—not assumptions. commented 2025-09-13 20:04:12 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦119 |
| 171854351 (Comments: 1) | Sim713 (Discussed changesets: 1) | please don't use descriptive names like "Grassy area" - not every object needs a name! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only commented 2025-09-13 19:56:15 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171859283 (Comments: 1) | mcdonaldsworker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM! Glad to see a new editor. (One thing I’ll mention here is that the school names you’re adding are already tagged on the school grounds area, so don’t need to be added again.) Thanks again, there’s a little ... commented 2025-09-13 15:10:04 UTC by seattlefyi ♦375 |
| 171864862 (Comments: 1) | Mittul Shah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5971791871 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-09-13 13:57:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171871727 (Comments: 1) | Keith_Op (Discussed changesets: 1) | Accidentally moved Hard Labor creek connector ~10-15’. Didn't realize until after I saved and can't figure out how to revert. Sorry about that. commented 2025-09-13 12:39:25 UTC by Keith_Op ♦1 |
| 171847522 (Comments: 1) | norvig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Can you please add some footway for the bridge? commented 2025-09-13 07:51:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171862544 (Comments: 1) | Glove5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Glove5, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. Th... commented 2025-09-13 07:46:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,630 |
| 171850116 (Comments: 1) | Baldest Doodler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, there's a bunch popping up. I added 3 on the southwest side of town commented 2025-09-13 03:54:17 UTC by d3phunk37 ♦1 |
| 171856827 (Comments: 1) | Calamity_Engine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Calamity_Engine, Welcome to OSM, and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. I'd like to point out that because our street names here are a little unusual, we have a wiki page with specific guidance: https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-09-13 03:31:42 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦46 |
| 160152319 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 10) | Several months later, as a more experienced mapper, I now realize that this changeset was in error: micro-mapping of parking stalls is a real thing. Sorry! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171857575 commented 2025-09-13 03:06:48 UTC by pwbriggs ♦62 |
| 164049056 (Comments: 1) | dcsohl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, What was your thought process for mapping this as a mini roundabout? Did you survey it? I am just confused cos to my eye from driving though here it just seems like a standard mass roundabout with a significant (>6") raised central... commented 2025-09-13 02:18:46 UTC by RedEyedVireo ♦21 |
| 169799448 (Comments: 2) | PaPaMooSe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, If I don't get a response on this soon I am going to be left with no choice but to revert this edit as the edit to the nashua river is defiantly incorrect. I do belive that this was a mistake and if you would like help fixing this or ... commented 2025-09-13 02:10:26 UTC by RedEyedVireo ♦21 |
| 171845729 (Comments: 3) | Anthrosen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Which website did you use? If any object in your view belongs to a relation, you can select an object (like a tram stop), scroll down to the "Relations" section, and type the route's name or ref. commented 2025-09-13 02:01:17 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦79 |
| 171850387 (Comments: 1) | Circuit360 (Discussed changesets: 2) | First edit jitters, I get it. So the north building is Circuit360? What kind of business is this? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171850387 commented 2025-09-13 01:14:20 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171850458 (Comments: 1) | Circuit360 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is the email address still circuit360okc@gmail.com? Is the phone number still +1 813 444 5879? Also be aware that the name tag should only contain the name, not the branch. There's a branch tag for that. --- ... commented 2025-09-13 01:10:24 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171854290 (Comments: 1) | norrellb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the update! You can find more that hasn't been updated recently in the StreetComplete app on Android and iOS. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2025-09-13 01:09:24 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171805308 (Comments: 1) | dechandler (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Include the tag addr:city=Tacoma when adding addresses to buildings and businesses. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171805308 commented 2025-09-13 00:24:26 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171835881 (Comments: 2) | HashFerret (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wonder if we can use https://deflock.me/map#map=12/40.738933/-111.860218 commented 2025-09-12 22:50:29 UTC by mvexel ♦145 |
| 171811375 (Comments: 1) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 11) | this parking seems to be for the court house so I am unsure if access=private is correct in this case, can you prove that this is only for employees or something, or could it also be for those that are defendants etc because then it may not be privat... commented 2025-09-12 22:47:53 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171811272 (Comments: 1) | Metauro (Discussed changesets: 5) | based on on the aerial imagery this looks like more of a parking you pay for not for any particular business so I am unsure if private is the best value. commented 2025-09-12 22:45:22 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171740319 (Comments: 1) | Iwaku (Discussed changesets: 1) | I was the one who added the Tram Tag, i will gladly understand if that was incorrect, however, when i saw that road, i saw Rails (now unused) in the road indicative of a past use as a tram way commented 2025-09-12 22:13:41 UTC by CharliStarry ♦1 |
| 171847911 (Comments: 1) | Rhamear (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding details to the map. Two important things to point out: 1. Please don't copy from Google Maps. It's against their terms of service and against the rules of OSM. It looks like the details for at lea... commented 2025-09-12 20:57:06 UTC by iandees ♦736 |
| 171848705 (Comments: 1) | N_Inman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi N_Inman, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. T... commented 2025-09-12 20:07:05 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,630 |
| 168862137 (Comments: 1) | Soozcat (Discussed changesets: 2) | haha, it took a while for somebody to notice https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1414386787 (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4952611). But please don't map made-up things in the future, we don't want to start a trend of vandalism. commented 2025-09-12 19:48:57 UTC by pwbriggs ♦62 |
| 171470697 (Comments: 2) | blueridgeautoga (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171479980 commented 2025-09-12 18:02:54 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171471657 (Comments: 2) | JenAtoZPartyRental (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/171844688 commented 2025-09-12 18:02:15 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171483199 (Comments: 2) | atlantavideoprod1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/171576455 commented 2025-09-12 18:01:16 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,563 |
| 171813366 (Comments: 1) | Metauro (Discussed changesets: 5) | have you checked if any of the parking at this highschool is for student parking, because if there is access=private doesn't seem like the correct tag for the situation. commented 2025-09-12 15:54:05 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171813637 (Comments: 1) | Ky_AT (Discussed changesets: 17) | these are clearly residential roads, just because there is parking along the road does not mean that it is a service road. commented 2025-09-12 15:51:48 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171814188 (Comments: 1) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 10) | have you checked if any of the ap0rking lots at this highschool allow student parking because it any do then access=private would be inaccurate. commented 2025-09-12 15:49:08 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171817279 (Comments: 1) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 10) | are you sure that this parking is not for LoanDepot Park, because if it is then I am not sure that access=private would be appropriate. commented 2025-09-12 15:41:36 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171823735 (Comments: 1) | Gorger (Discussed changesets: 10) | if you look at the imagery this is a oneway commented 2025-09-12 15:28:11 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171827727 (Comments: 1) | BR_pebble (Discussed changesets: 11) | looking at their website I do not think that access=no is warranted https://hachidoggrooming.com/ commented 2025-09-12 15:25:50 UTC by Udarian ♦475 |
| 171831473 (Comments: 1) | mecknr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. Is there a reason you removed the "Spider Social Trail"? Looks like there is a good amount of activity there in the last 12 months that indicates it actually exists on the ground. You have a new account and might ... commented 2025-09-12 13:53:06 UTC by MassCartog ♦152 |
| 156863796 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Baloo Uriza, I apologize for missing placement tags. Thank you for your insights. Best regards, Surander commented 2025-09-12 09:35:55 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦6 |
| 158205452 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Baloo Uriza, Thank you very much for explaining why you split the roads that I added. We will update our best practices mapping with these kinds of examples. Best regards, Surander commented 2025-09-12 09:31:14 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦6 |
| 171800387 (Comments: 1) | Yaroslava Tyler Morehouse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please don#T existing objects from the map. You can add acces=private for private streets. I have already done it. commented 2025-09-12 07:06:06 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171797301 (Comments: 1) | Nononoeducationalpirpouses (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please move the camera on the correct side of the street. commented 2025-09-12 07:02:25 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171796848 (Comments: 1) | Piper Leigh Berry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please move restaurant The Manufactory to the correct building. (it isn't part of the street) commented 2025-09-12 07:00:55 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171797010 (Comments: 1) | Tyler Medley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I remove your speedlimit of 545 mph or 877.1 kmh. It's a bit too oversized for an asphalt road. commented 2025-09-12 06:58:17 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171800891 (Comments: 1) | MaxMaps337 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6738898866 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-09-12 06:48:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171806768 (Comments: 1) | Totokid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/10010986741, https://www.osm.org/node/10010986742 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the nodes back to the original position. commented 2025-09-12 06:31:45 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171696212 (Comments: 1) | Biochembob (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi! I was just curious how you were aware of the new segment between US 41 and US 60 opened to traffic and was designated as KY 3690? commented 2025-09-12 06:13:48 UTC by OrdinaryScarlett ♦13 |
| 171611905 (Comments: 10) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 153) | Thank you for pointing me on your proposal on the forum on that matter. I think that I understood most of it, but probably not well enough to explain how the combination of the tags area:highway / (area+highway) make sense according to your defini... commented 2025-09-12 05:24:31 UTC by ratrun ♦249 |
| 171803854 (Comments: 1) | hayvenhurst-x (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171807656 commented 2025-09-12 00:50:35 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦32,254 |
| 171710934 (Comments: 2) | Ken Weaver (Discussed changesets: 2) | I didn't hear back from you so I changed the street back to the original configuration --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710934 commented 2025-09-11 22:27:28 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171758549 (Comments: 1) | gregcrago (Discussed changesets: 40) | This actually isn't a waterbody of any sort, though it does look like it on aerial imagery-- that's part of why on the ground verification is important for OSM. This is actually a large black tarp with tires placed on it. It collects water ... commented 2025-09-11 21:41:39 UTC by colorful-corvid ♦6 |
| 141323724 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 128) | I am sorry for all the work you've had to do. Just can you try to use less 'snarky' block messages, and message me the reason for 10rex's block and the email address to 10rex? -Hayvenhurst41 commented 2025-09-11 21:25:19 UTC by hayvenhurst-x ♦2 |
| 141045464 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 128) | I am sorry for these vandilizations and will not creating any more socks in the future. I understand if you block me, just please don't revert my edits without looking at them first. Also, I still don't know why I was banned. As you ... commented 2025-09-11 21:22:53 UTC by hayvenhurst-x ♦2 |
| 171794080 (Comments: 2) | SimplyLivingNow (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you!! commented 2025-09-11 20:44:04 UTC by SimplyLivingNow ♦1 |
| 169656055 (Comments: 1) | PizzaTreeIsland (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hi, please use fewer nodes for your ways with irrigation=pivot. I have to come thru after you, and reduce them to a 30cm threshold. There is nothing in an agricultural area which is more precise than 30cm. commented 2025-09-11 18:55:22 UTC by bdiscoe ♦52 |
| 171750842 (Comments: 3) | Buttons Cheely (Discussed changesets: 33) | don't think so - turning left at that entrance works fine in OSRM now. commented 2025-09-11 18:38:34 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171793939 (Comments: 1) | Great Carmania MS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I didn't see any street Davis Road near by, you website has an error, the aerial image shows no building. Did you get the point right? commented 2025-09-11 18:07:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171697135 (Comments: 4) | Anonymous897234 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please feel free to ask for some feedback in the forums, but my hunch is that the general gist is that this is too much for OSM. commented 2025-09-11 18:06:41 UTC by mueschel ♦6,658 |
| 171790322 (Comments: 3) | BooShooter (Discussed changesets: 1) | The one south on 27 is next to Northland Mini Storage south of N Ranger Station Rd. commented 2025-09-11 17:54:27 UTC by iandees ♦736 |
| 171710664 (Comments: 2) | Ken Weaver (Discussed changesets: 2) | It's also a good to add a tag to describe the business of Lux AutoHouse. In the editor, just search for the type of business to add the tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/... commented 2025-09-11 17:53:56 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 168530688 (Comments: 1) | zluuzki (Discussed changesets: 119) | FYI, this changeset with church which has been gone for years. https://www.osm.org/note/4956347 commented 2025-09-11 17:51:01 UTC by bdentremont ♦56 |
| 171796183 (Comments: 1) | tangue (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi tangue, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. Th... commented 2025-09-11 17:38:15 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,630 |
| 171791617 (Comments: 4) | GPS Renting (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you. have a great day ahead! commented 2025-09-11 17:25:03 UTC by GPS Renting ♦1 |
| 171785354 (Comments: 2) | friendsacademylibrary (Discussed changesets: 1) | The building is both called Kumar Wang Library and contains a library. commented 2025-09-11 16:35:03 UTC by friendsacademylibrary ♦1 |
| 171792438 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 376) | Wrong comment: Add via node to u-turn restriction. commented 2025-09-11 16:05:48 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 160852047 (Comments: 4) | ZeLonewolf (Discussed changesets: 149) | Relations are just a collection of member ways. I'm not sure what you're asking. commented 2025-09-11 15:34:13 UTC by ZeLonewolf ♦567 |
| 171787307 (Comments: 1) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | Looks more like it goes through the gate on the west side of that building rather than under it --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171787307 commented 2025-09-11 15:11:18 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦4 |
| 171636576 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171779624 Segments were merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171779624#map=16/42.39032/-82.95843&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:59:06 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171629443 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171787662 Segments merged back together http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/171787662 commented 2025-09-11 14:58:35 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171602774 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171787329 Segments merged back together http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/171787329 commented 2025-09-11 14:57:49 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171600049 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171786971 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171786971#map=18/42.405000/-82.932761&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:57:24 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599933 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171786777 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171786777#map=14/42.40409/-82.93276&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:57:11 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599743 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171785824 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171785824#map=16/42.41142/-82.93848&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:56:55 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599253 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171785544 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171785544 commented 2025-09-11 14:56:39 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599138 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171785239 Segments merged back together http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/171785239 commented 2025-09-11 14:56:23 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599002 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171783041 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171783041 commented 2025-09-11 14:56:02 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171597681 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171782421 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171782421 commented 2025-09-11 14:55:46 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171560002 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171782204 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171782204 commented 2025-09-11 14:55:27 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559917 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171781853 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171781853 commented 2025-09-11 14:55:09 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559822 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171781107 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171781107#map=17/42.414168/-82.926931&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:54:49 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559727 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171780741 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780741 commented 2025-09-11 14:54:22 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559485 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171780658 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780658 commented 2025-09-11 14:53:41 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559352 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171780549 Segments merged back together http://openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780549 commented 2025-09-11 14:53:13 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171558929 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780446#map=16/42.41418/-82.92693&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:52:34 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171558530 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171780157 Segments merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171780157#map=17/42.412917/-82.927839&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 14:51:46 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171761810 (Comments: 1) | evanpeterjones (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like you tagged the landuse area around it and the neighboring business, but no worries, I did a little homework and moved that information to the correct building. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Publish... commented 2025-09-11 13:32:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171768971 (Comments: 1) | thehousewashere (Discussed changesets: 1) | You can just use the unit designator without "suite" in the address. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171768971 commented 2025-09-11 13:16:45 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171777449 (Comments: 1) | tegabo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you made edits across a pretty big geographic area. It's best to keep them local so that they're easier to review and don't alert people across the country :) commented 2025-09-11 13:11:36 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦4 |
| 171635934 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset Segments were merged back together and wrong restrictions were removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171779133#map=14/42.38705/-82.95744&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 11:18:02 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171626122 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171777770 Segments were merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171777770#map=17/42.399704/-82.963700&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 10:50:18 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171602512 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171777252 Segments were merged back together and wrong restrictions were removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171777252#map=15/42.39744/-82.94638&layers=N commented 2025-09-11 10:37:04 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171624970 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171776537 Segments were merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171776537 commented 2025-09-11 10:30:00 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171603175 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Fixed in changeset 171775592 Segments were merged back together https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171775592 commented 2025-09-11 10:05:42 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 161768408 (Comments: 1) | zabik (Discussed changesets: 1) | dude u supposed to tag them maxspeed=25 mph not maxspeed=25 please fix it thanks commented 2025-09-11 09:36:36 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦76 |
| 171741623 (Comments: 1) | Quinnhilla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcolme to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/4950470545. Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at ht... commented 2025-09-11 07:49:05 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171749273 (Comments: 1) | AlphaDesignSEO (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I assume you want to map the layout of the church. The standard procedure for this is called indoor mapping and is described in the wiki at https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging. Could you please adjust your change according... commented 2025-09-11 07:35:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171763497 (Comments: 1) | E J Roberts - State Farm Insurance Agent (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-09-11 07:16:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171753345 (Comments: 1) | Gabi Claire gambill (Discussed changesets: 1) | test comment. 👋😆 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171753345 commented 2025-09-11 02:33:10 UTC by buy_osmand ♦127 |
| 171728454 (Comments: 1) | Dark_Valor (Discussed changesets: 16) | I went ahead and tagged the stairs as bridge=yes where it overlaps with the section below it. Layer tags on overlapping ways don't really do much without a bridge=* or tunnel=* tag. commented 2025-09-11 02:10:34 UTC by pontificator_extraordinaire ♦15 |
| 171610739 (Comments: 2) | pontificator_extraordinaire (Discussed changesets: 6) | wrong changeset commented 2025-09-11 02:10:23 UTC by pontificator_extraordinaire ♦15 |
| 171277489 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 190) | Roads are classified based on their connectivity rather than their designation, especially since highway designations are often arbitrary in the scope of navigation and tend to reflect which entity maintains the road more than anything (particularly ... commented 2025-09-11 01:29:07 UTC by Joseph R P ♦368 |
| 171756417 (Comments: 1) | Matt_COB (Discussed changesets: 1) | On OSM, we use the fully expanded suffix for street names ("Berry Branch Ln" should be "Berry Branch Lane", for example) Let me know if you need help fixing this! commented 2025-09-10 23:19:30 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171757659 (Comments: 1) | ChillisFan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. highway=residential is a necessary tag and describes the type of road this is. I readded it for you. commented 2025-09-10 23:16:53 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171744210 (Comments: 1) | George S (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi, how do you know that the trail is abandoned? commented 2025-09-10 22:36:09 UTC by Mashin ♦571 |
| 171706866 (Comments: 1) | GraceRobinson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey welcome to OSM! These ways through parking lots were actually mapped correctly. Check out other examples if you are unsure about how to map things. Thanks! commented 2025-09-10 18:49:56 UTC by MassCartog ♦152 |
| 171642801 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 123) | Fixed it! commented 2025-09-10 17:23:59 UTC by Omnific ♦206 |
| 158074243 (Comments: 2) | skumarchandela_lyft (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hi, Baloo Uriza! My name is Sumit and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. You are absolutely right. I shouldn’t add name on the whole way. My apologies. I will be more attentive when pus... commented 2025-09-10 15:17:53 UTC by skumarchandela_lyft ♦6 |
| 171726208 (Comments: 2) | DimaLebedev (Discussed changesets: 3) | clarification: Added missing roads and relations according to Bing Maps Aerial and Bing Streetside #mapbox_linters --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171726208 commented 2025-09-10 13:39:41 UTC by DimaLebedev ♦3 |
| 158439782 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hi Baloo Uriza, My name is Surander, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you very much for sharing your local insights and for removing our edits. Best regards, Surander commented 2025-09-10 11:44:09 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦6 |
| 171690459 (Comments: 1) | Evington (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I have adjusted hgv to destination as trucks can enter but should not cut through. Cheers commented 2025-09-10 11:20:14 UTC by Mashin ♦571 |
| 171724824 (Comments: 1) | Cameroncounseling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. You business isn't a street crossing! commented 2025-09-10 10:39:43 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 167811740 (Comments: 1) | uftyv (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I wanted to make you aware that this changeset added several dozen nodes without any tags. It might be worth reviewing to confirm the changeset saved as expected. commented 2025-09-10 10:16:24 UTC by Mapiate ♦28 |
| 171624826 (Comments: 2) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Udarian, Thank you for your comments. I referred the following resources and tagged as private according to the community guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=employees?uselang=en https://help.openstreetmap.org/questi... commented 2025-09-10 08:19:37 UTC by Nar_ach ♦10 |
| 171624551 (Comments: 2) | Nar_ach (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Udarian, Thank you for your comments. I referred the following resources and tagged as private according to the community guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=employees?uselang=en https://help.openstreetmap.org/questi... commented 2025-09-10 08:17:52 UTC by Nar_ach ♦10 |
| 171624257 (Comments: 2) | Metauro (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Udarian, The service road within the parking lot already carries the access=private tag, which was prompted by an OSMOSE flag and brought to our attention. The available Mapillary imagery (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=114014654075833&am... commented 2025-09-10 08:11:44 UTC by Metauro ♦6 |
| 171698252 (Comments: 1) | Ignacio Padilla (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. Your business isn't a park. commented 2025-09-10 08:08:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171713252 (Comments: 1) | Pewter10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Pewter10, welcome and thank you for your contribution to the OSM project! To help improve collaboration and make your edits easier for others to understand, please consider providing brief descriptions of your changes in the comment field. ... commented 2025-09-10 02:59:54 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,630 |
| 171712256 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 201) | Thank you for adding all of the path details from my notes! I will look into the StreetComplete app. commented 2025-09-10 02:55:23 UTC by ForestFurnace ♦49 |
| 171706416 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 190) | Alright then, thanks for the information! commented 2025-09-10 02:26:23 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦79 |
| 156693884 (Comments: 1) | COBAddressing (Discussed changesets: 4) | highway=secondary is not for driveways commented 2025-09-10 02:10:00 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,090 |
| 171711760 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 201) | This is awesome, thanks CurlingMan commented 2025-09-10 01:29:41 UTC by mbeyerle ♦46 |
| 170246323 (Comments: 1) | DawsZed (Discussed changesets: 8) | For self storage places, the name should be added to the larger landuse area or as a node if there is more than one building. commented 2025-09-10 01:10:25 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,058 |
| 171293775 (Comments: 1) | Daitruxdd (Discussed changesets: 9) | Is "116 Bayard Street" the actual name? Please provide a source for the name and update accordingly if that isn't the actual name. I advise you to read up on the name wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:... commented 2025-09-10 01:01:12 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,058 |
| 171711226 (Comments: 1) | jtracey (Discussed changesets: 57) | Resolves https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4888474 commented 2025-09-10 00:53:40 UTC by jtracey ♦168 |
| 171663575 (Comments: 3) | drakeerv (Discussed changesets: 1) | No problem! Awesome job on adding all these buildings etc. Anthon is looking great! commented 2025-09-09 22:56:44 UTC by pwbriggs ♦62 |
| 171650651 (Comments: 2) | vdrumman (Discussed changesets: 1) | The property is owned by a friend, and is no longer used as an airport despite its appearance, thanks. commented 2025-09-09 22:21:58 UTC by vdrumman ♦1 |
| 171652066 (Comments: 1) | PingMars (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you also add a tag to describe the type of business. The editor allows a search for tags. And the wiki at wiki.openstreetmap.org can also help --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets... commented 2025-09-09 21:43:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171650111 (Comments: 1) | Pewter10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | turning loop isn't needed when you actually draw the loop. Can you remove it? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171650111 commented 2025-09-09 21:30:28 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171612198 (Comments: 1) | floreli (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Leave the address node when removing the business. Hopefully a new business will take over the same address making it easier for the next mapper. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... commented 2025-09-09 21:28:39 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171610235 (Comments: 1) | athenianpenguin (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: check out the ESRI World Imagery. Select the background icon then select ESRI World Imagery for more current views. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171610235 ... commented 2025-09-09 21:26:47 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171610180 (Comments: 1) | athenianpenguin (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time with abrevations --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171610180 commented 2025-09-09 21:24:51 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171456067 (Comments: 1) | allthepotatoes (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera was just moved commented 2025-09-09 19:16:52 UTC by allthepotatoes ♦1 |
| 171293110 (Comments: 1) | Daitruxdd (Discussed changesets: 9) | Is the name really "705 Joyce Kilmer Avenue" or is that just the placeholder? If you don't have an actual name, please leave it blank. Name is only a name and not an address. commented 2025-09-09 18:13:18 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,058 |
| 162064201 (Comments: 2) | TeeEn (Discussed changesets: 1) | wait, maybe this edit only split this road? commented 2025-09-09 17:23:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,012 |
| 117621048 (Comments: 1) | UrbanUnPlanner (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8963458/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign |
| 171639985 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171695794 commented 2025-09-09 16:37:46 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171639046 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because the wrong road was tagged #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171695583 commented 2025-09-09 16:32:28 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171636271 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because the wrong road was tagged #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171694565 commented 2025-09-09 16:10:54 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171635024 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because the wrong road was tagged #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171693595 commented 2025-09-09 15:49:56 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171634744 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171693055 commented 2025-09-09 15:38:16 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171634458 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171692765 commented 2025-09-09 15:33:13 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 170807581 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 64) | According to streetlevel imagery, not all street signs in the area display directional prefixes. Therefore, adding them would be a violation of the "on-the-ground" rule. This doesn't even count the fact that some streets' directio... commented 2025-09-09 15:01:06 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦79 |
| 171689262 (Comments: 1) | YuliyaSurta (Discussed changesets: 54) | Wrong action was mentioned. Changed road class. commented 2025-09-09 14:18:41 UTC by YuliyaSurta ♦54 |
| 171683428 (Comments: 1) | Magjul (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/108119884. What is the mean of the tags crossing:markings=no description=not part of lakeside dr. name=driveway ? Does this path not exist up to the node https://www.o... commented 2025-09-09 12:51:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171602998 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171684301 commented 2025-09-09 12:37:58 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171600855 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171683756 commented 2025-09-09 12:26:51 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171600482 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split and wrong restriction limits#OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171681989 commented 2025-09-09 11:50:52 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171600177 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split and sign removal #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171681492 commented 2025-09-09 11:41:51 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171599390 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171680906 commented 2025-09-09 11:30:00 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 167227204 (Comments: 4) | carolinek22 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Would you mind switching it back from access=private? That would keep the tagging consistent with how “Private Way” is treated in Massachusetts. Thanks! commented 2025-09-09 10:55:28 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦119 |
| 171671465 (Comments: 1) | viktoriia_frolova (Discussed changesets: 1) | road geometry was fixed and turn restrictions were added based on Esri World Imagery (2022) commented 2025-09-09 10:37:26 UTC by viktoriia_frolova ♦1 |
| 171559216 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171677207 commented 2025-09-09 10:11:10 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171559079 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171676056 commented 2025-09-09 09:45:33 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171667338 (Comments: 1) | charliemikeprotectionaz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description or slogan contains detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and fo... commented 2025-09-09 06:30:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,630 |
| 166726108 (Comments: 2) | Mountain_Hiker (Discussed changesets: 1) | To elaborate, ford=yes should be treated like bridge=yes or tunnel=yes. The entirety of a highway that features a bridge should not be tagged with bridge=yes, but rather the way should be broken into sections and only the section involving th... commented 2025-09-09 06:10:56 UTC by ericrw_ ♦4 |
| 171508786 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.nps.gov/pore/planyourvisit/tomales-bay-boat-in-camping.htm > There are no designated campsites along Tomales Bay. Instead, there are a number of beaches on which one may camp, if one has a boat-in camping permit. Deleted... commented 2025-09-09 01:33:24 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171506971 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171660439 I moved the campground to a different location based on the pictures on the NPS website. I believe that the location it was originally is private cabins not operated by the NPS commented 2025-09-09 01:03:05 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 171506627 (Comments: 1) | marnib (Discussed changesets: 1) | I added a more specific website link. Thanks for your contribution commented 2025-09-09 00:46:57 UTC by citrula ♦923 |
| 169686124 (Comments: 1) | Corey Fonseca (Discussed changesets: 3) | I checked out this path. In fact, it is for rainwater runoff drainage. Not a path. Also, it's on private land, owned by Crossharbor Capital Partners LLC and as such not intended as a path. commented 2025-09-09 00:39:44 UTC by aduxas ♦36 |
| 171636695 (Comments: 1) | H Casey (Discussed changesets: 1) | Old roads rarely are straight up deleted unless they were added incorrectly, or completely razed. Instead we often do a prefix code to indicate they exist, but were states of disrepair. This is sometimes useful for hikers and for people to no... commented 2025-09-09 00:03:44 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦81 |
| 171513664 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | I merged this trailhead with the other POI for the same trailhead nearby --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171513664 commented 2025-09-08 23:25:59 UTC by jake-low ♦38 |
| 171513674 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | I fixed a typo in this trailhead's name ("Alum Cave Trailhead Trailhead") --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171513674 commented 2025-09-08 23:25:36 UTC by jake-low ♦38 |
| 171514109 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | FYI, it looks like this changeset accidentally included a couple of redundant trailhead nodes. I've edited them again to fix this. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171514109<... commented 2025-09-08 23:11:02 UTC by jake-low ♦38 |
| 171514231 (Comments: 1) | tstellini (Discussed changesets: 12) | FYI, I've removed this trailhead since it doesn't meet OSM's definition (a place where someone could start a hike or journey), since it's deep in the wilderness at the USFS/NPS boundary. This was an issue with the source dataset, ... commented 2025-09-08 23:05:13 UTC by jake-low ♦38 |
| 171655645 (Comments: 2) | camerawoman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, I will use the expanded comment going forward! commented 2025-09-08 21:18:27 UTC by camerawoman ♦1 |
| 171655597 (Comments: 1) | Lumikeiju (Discussed changesets: 47) | Deleted duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13000000101 commented 2025-09-08 20:42:43 UTC by Lumikeiju ♦109 |
| 171649655 (Comments: 2) | Kabooshki (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, they have a solar panel with a branch-shaped antenna on top of a pole. They have been on campus for quite a few years at this point. commented 2025-09-08 20:32:56 UTC by Kabooshki ♦3 |
| 171505995 (Comments: 1) | RentManagerWeb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Mall parcel is inclusive of multiple addresses; if this address is the property management office, then the property management office should be tagged. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: ht... commented 2025-09-08 20:03:18 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171641000 (Comments: 1) | Meredith McLaughlin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3342210427 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-09-08 20:00:42 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171653617 (Comments: 1) | Austin Lamb (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/2531462949 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position commented 2025-09-08 19:45:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171566199 (Comments: 7) | ChrisWray (Discussed changesets: 1) | I believe you should be good now. I also went and fixed the house outlines. Feel free to work on the rest. The City of Pasco has a good database of house numbers. https://maps-cityofpasco.hub.arcgis.com/apps/389edcfba6324ad48c147aa1d25c6878/explore commented 2025-09-08 18:43:22 UTC by Glassman ♦5,366 |
| 171642796 (Comments: 1) | NEConstruction (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I checked their website and it still says that the restaurant is open. Is there a reason for deleting it? commented 2025-09-08 18:14:51 UTC by Mashin ♦571 |
| 171608524 (Comments: 3) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks! Nice work improving all these features! commented 2025-09-08 17:14:47 UTC by MassCartog ♦152 |
| 171514641 (Comments: 2) | elvee@AT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! I should have flagged that for human review because I was on the fence. They have it on their website despite not being accessible by road, which seemed odd! https://www.nps.gov/places/000/bridger-lake-trailhead-6k4.htm commented 2025-09-08 16:44:49 UTC by elvee@AT ♦1 |
| 171608274 (Comments: 2) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | I have re installed the building commented 2025-09-08 16:29:58 UTC by Goappr Studios ♦5 |
| 171608377 (Comments: 2) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | I have re installed the building commented 2025-09-08 16:26:26 UTC by Goappr Studios ♦5 |
| 171608510 (Comments: 2) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | I have re installed the building commented 2025-09-08 16:23:46 UTC by Goappr Studios ♦5 |
| 171608476 (Comments: 2) | Goappr Studios (Discussed changesets: 5) | I have re installed the 2 building commented 2025-09-08 16:19:39 UTC by Goappr Studios ♦5 |
| 171636868 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 147) | Reverting because of a malfunction on revert #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171642349 commented 2025-09-08 15:34:54 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171642023 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 147) | Reverting because of a malfunction on the revert #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171642130 commented 2025-09-08 15:30:24 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171558245 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171642023 commented 2025-09-08 15:28:29 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171641764 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 147) | Reverting because of a malfunction on the revert #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171641942 commented 2025-09-08 15:26:56 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171558162 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171641287 commented 2025-09-08 15:13:45 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171634969 (Comments: 1) | listenheardiagnostics (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Welcome to OSM. If the building still exists on the ground (has not been demolished) then you should just remove the tags and keep the building outline. Could you go back through your changes and correct this? replace or restore building... commented 2025-09-08 15:06:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦152 |
| 171554915 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171640651 commented 2025-09-08 15:01:51 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171554442 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171640051 commented 2025-09-08 14:52:14 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171554274 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171639579 commented 2025-09-08 14:44:17 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171389631 (Comments: 11) | bhartinegi_lyft (Discussed changesets: 1) | Situation normal for Lyft... commented 2025-09-08 14:42:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,167 |
| 171553927 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171639293 commented 2025-09-08 14:39:34 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171516254 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171638640 commented 2025-09-08 14:27:19 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171516084 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171637751 commented 2025-09-08 14:10:02 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171515864 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171637478 commented 2025-09-08 14:05:15 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171515741 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171636868 commented 2025-09-08 13:54:08 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171515538 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171636700 commented 2025-09-08 13:51:00 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171511291 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171636480 commented 2025-09-08 13:47:04 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171505602 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171635405 commented 2025-09-08 13:28:12 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171626476 (Comments: 1) | rollinghomesrvrepair (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes by https://www.osm.org/changeset/171634663 commented 2025-09-08 13:15:07 UTC by user_5359 ♦19,897 |
| 171504125 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171634454 commented 2025-09-08 13:09:46 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171501710 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171634147 commented 2025-09-08 13:03:58 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171499689 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171633333 commented 2025-09-08 12:46:58 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171499384 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171632215 commented 2025-09-08 12:24:04 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171499188 (Comments: 1) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171630435 commented 2025-09-08 11:44:05 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |
| 171497847 (Comments: 2) | IvaLedinščak (Discussed changesets: 89) | Reverting because of an unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171630273 commented 2025-09-08 11:40:01 UTC by TinPetreković ♦168 |