| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 174016633 (Comments: 2) | Gary E Adams (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Law firm Pellettieri Rabstein & Altman" commented 2025-10-31 11:39:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 174014357 (Comments: 2) | castleexteriors (Discussed changesets: 2) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Contracting company serving Wisconsin Illinois and Kentucky" commented 2025-10-31 10:45:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173268766 (Comments: 2) | anautiyal_lyft (Discussed changesets: 6) | My name is Sumit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft and Abhishek’s Teammate. Thank you for catching this mistake and bringing it to my attention. You are absolutely right — in this case, I shouldn’t have connected these... commented 2025-10-31 10:01:34 UTC by skumarchandela_lyft ♦12 |
| 174010897 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 165) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 174010934 The node served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174010934 commented 2025-10-31 09:19:50 UTC by TinPetreković ♦180 |
| 174008801 (Comments: 2) | carmilcabinetryfl (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Kitchen cabinetry company in St Petersburg" commented 2025-10-31 08:27:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 174008502 (Comments: 2) | hunterappraisal (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Real estate appraisal service in Dallas Fort Worth area" commented 2025-10-31 08:21:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173990853 (Comments: 1) | Bootheel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1396142027. What is the mean of the tag "land manager" = "USFS"? Did you mean USFS = yes? commented 2025-10-31 08:13:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 174008282 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 165) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 174008363 The node served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174008363 commented 2025-10-31 08:13:04 UTC by TinPetreković ♦180 |
| 173999714 (Comments: 2) | TheEasyLife777 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Or have a look on your first flock camera: https://www.osm.org/node/13123524559 commented 2025-10-31 07:51:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 174005868 (Comments: 1) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 86) | Oops, reused wrong changeset description. This was a revert on a bad change that violated basic golf course etiquette (fairways crossing over greens) commented 2025-10-31 06:44:50 UTC by b-jazz ♦745 |
| 173928219 (Comments: 2) | achauhan_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Changeset: 173928219 Date: 30/10/25 Task Comment from silversurfer83 about 13 hours ago Hi there :) shouldn't this be a conditional access like access:conditional=no @ delivery cheers --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2025-10-31 03:01:33 UTC by achauhan_Lyft ♦2 |
| 173297770 (Comments: 3) | deusjz (Discussed changesets: 2) | It is. Painted bike lanes that are part of the roadway are always mapped using the `cycleway=lane` tag on the road itself. Separated or protected bike lanes that run alongside a road can either be mapped as a separate `highway=cycleway` or as a `cycl... commented 2025-10-31 02:45:34 UTC by pesticides ♦29 |
| 173962549 (Comments: 2) | ZLima12 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Hi, Even if the trail was created "illegally and in secret", it should not be removed from the map. Legality only might affect the access value. That being said, this trail is on public land, so I'm not sure that `access=private... commented 2025-10-31 00:04:47 UTC by ZLima12 ♦276 |
| 173908030 (Comments: 2) | DippetyDoodah (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173995517 commented 2025-10-30 21:03:02 UTC by ion_chi ♦35 |
| 173901316 (Comments: 2) | Loye Young (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is no building called Victory Commons. Rather, "Victory Commons" is the area around the garage, the American Airlines Center, and the two Victory Plazas. The entire structure marked with a P (which seems to be also labeled &quo... commented 2025-10-30 20:55:15 UTC by Loye Young ♦1 |
| 173991618 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 91) | If there is, in fact, a sign indicating its name, I couldn't find it, and it's definitely not along the main highway. Is it buried on some random intersection hidden from Street View? commented 2025-10-30 19:06:34 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦118 |
| 173973237 (Comments: 1) | Guardian Protection (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.... commented 2025-10-30 18:40:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173989123 (Comments: 1) | SarahAr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.o... commented 2025-10-30 18:14:41 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173735746 (Comments: 1) | Spencer_MHD (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, thanks for this changeset! The only thing is that the change from grassland to farmland near the southshore may be what the aerial photos show, but I don't think it's current use. The area is currently an empty field and planned for fu... commented 2025-10-30 17:07:37 UTC by HoubkneghteS ♦2 |
| 173977894 (Comments: 2) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 14) | I was doing some cleanup and added some abandoned rail using usgs 3d elevation program data and compared it to esri data. commented 2025-10-30 17:03:44 UTC by Isopycnic ♦8 |
| 168254609 (Comments: 1) | nikdavid (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Phil from the Data Working Group here. We have received from some mappers who are concerned by the use of the Nerf Map Editor. For the avoidance of doubt an editor which providing links to disallowed sources, in this case streetview, i... commented 2025-10-30 16:59:26 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,402 |
| 173985115 (Comments: 1) | Helmchen42 (Discussed changesets: 43) | Hydrogeography in north WY, US commented 2025-10-30 16:26:21 UTC by Helmchen42 ♦24 |
| 173977694 (Comments: 1) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 14) | I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changese... commented 2025-10-30 16:23:23 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173979076 (Comments: 1) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 14) | I'm not seeing any evidence on Bing or Esri aerials that this abandoned right of way exists anymore. Do you have updated imagery that shows it? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changes... commented 2025-10-30 16:22:23 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173982054 (Comments: 1) | skumarchandela_lyft (Discussed changesets: 12) | Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes. If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all. Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice. --- ... commented 2025-10-30 16:20:43 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173979714 (Comments: 1) | rkothiyal_lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please refrain from incorrectly tagging turn lanes. If you're not able to determine the legal moves from a particular lane, don't map lanes at all. Adding inaccurate information does everyone a disservice. --- ... commented 2025-10-30 16:18:44 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 167762520 (Comments: 2) | Frogs Magoo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also displaying the speed limit from other sources is not allowed in an OSM editor. commented 2025-10-30 14:44:50 UTC by trigpoint ♦2,402 |
| 173960232 (Comments: 1) | superiorplum (Discussed changesets: 1) | This POI contains ad copy, which is inappropriate in OSM. This POI is also in the middle of an intersection, not a place of business. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173977743 commented 2025-10-30 13:49:34 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 166939587 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | This appears to be an incomplete polygon for the Town Plaza mall, not just the doggy daycare. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166939587 commented 2025-10-30 13:05:05 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173971466 (Comments: 2) | modsagency (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Digital agency in Minnesota" commented 2025-10-30 11:33:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173821177 (Comments: 1) | Ediats (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Ediats, Someone has deleted the things that you added here because they say that they did not exist. They did that before, after they asked you about it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163509587 , but you did not reply. Best... commented 2025-10-30 11:32:31 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,485 |
| 173669161 (Comments: 4) | bhartinegi_lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for clarification. commented 2025-10-30 11:32:01 UTC by bhartinegi_lyft ♦1 |
| 173969856 (Comments: 2) | diamondscapewny (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Landscape and design company in Lockport" commented 2025-10-30 11:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 148918756 (Comments: 4) | MHNS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, I removed the access restrictions because this is a public park and a public street. If parking is not allowed on the street, then map that. commented 2025-10-30 09:22:11 UTC by ZLima12 ♦276 |
| 173964754 (Comments: 2) | safetreellc (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tree services company" commented 2025-10-30 09:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 148917986 (Comments: 3) | MHNS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, Even if the trail was completely on private property, deleting it from the map is not allowed. You can read about this here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F So either way, the trail should b... commented 2025-10-30 08:32:13 UTC by ZLima12 ♦276 |
| 173947908 (Comments: 1) | Haley Patel (Discussed changesets: 1) | ## Movement of a node Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/11227635392, https://www.osm.org/node/7047003588 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the nodes back to the original pos... commented 2025-10-30 06:48:00 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173957378 (Comments: 3) | hardikpatelallstateinsurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | I removed the blatant rubbish/ad copy description. commented 2025-10-30 06:20:37 UTC by skquinn ♦808 |
| 173954655 (Comments: 2) | LanceSong77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Removed toilet amenities, including name and attributes" commented 2025-10-30 04:56:26 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173829452 (Comments: 2) | Ra_colate (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thank you for the message. I’m glad to help, happy mapping! commented 2025-10-30 04:41:04 UTC by Ra_colate ♦17 |
| 168993087 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 91) | To be more specific, the issue with this approach is that when someone marks the road open again the turn restrictions aren't likely to be removed since the access tag is the usual method to mark a road that's closed. commented 2025-10-30 04:17:45 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127 |
| 173954046 (Comments: 1) | Danny Witt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2025-10-30 02:21:16 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173949124 (Comments: 1) | Bootheel (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2025-10-30 02:10:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173734605 (Comments: 3) | K&K13 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Awesome! I just know some armchair mappers overseas don't usually realize cul de sacs at corners like that usually denote a two-way intersection here and wanted to make sure. commented 2025-10-30 00:47:27 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173734471 (Comments: 3) | K&K13 (Discussed changesets: 3) | No worries, glad to help! commented 2025-10-30 00:45:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173952365 (Comments: 2) | pophob (Discussed changesets: 1) | Here is a sample comment based on your map edits: "Added surveillance cameras with ALPR type, Flock Safety manufacturer, for school and traffic zones" commented 2025-10-29 23:56:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173951676 (Comments: 1) | kechan_Rapid (Discussed changesets: 13) | *and roads commented 2025-10-29 23:04:49 UTC by kechan_Rapid ♦6 |
| 165290910 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Changing the layer means this is above the ground, not on the ground. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165290910 commented 2025-10-29 21:54:43 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173943101 (Comments: 1) | PaulDavis249 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for keeping the map up to date. The point you moved is on the wall of the building. Is that where the entrance for your office is? Typically we put the place point inside the building and have a separate point for the entrance. commented 2025-10-29 21:52:38 UTC by iandees ♦752 |
| 163015786 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Probably should be name=K-9 Resorts branch=Westbury. Name should only be the name. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163015786 commented 2025-10-29 21:49:07 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 159153734 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | Please don't adapt buildings into landuse like this. Easiest way to add a dog park if you're not sure how to map it is to just add a single point node, not to decide a building doesn't exist and is now a different shape. ... commented 2025-10-29 21:13:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173367931 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 11) | No, this isn't a building. Accuracy matters. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173367931 commented 2025-10-29 21:04:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173098189 (Comments: 1) | mapmakersami (Discussed changesets: 1) | hi there! while i do not disagree with your change, please note that "unclassified" has a very distinct meaning in OSM highway tagging, it is not an "unidentified" road type. commented 2025-10-29 20:47:22 UTC by jcarlson ♦117 |
| 173937062 (Comments: 1) | BlueMethod (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/13267350845. Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at ht... commented 2025-10-29 20:27:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173940736 (Comments: 3) | valaise (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks for understanding! And apologies for the rash revert (wanted to avoid further conflicts in case additional park details were being added today). Appreciate your help in adding amenity details to these parks, as I hadn't been able t... commented 2025-10-29 20:10:44 UTC by MapSpot ♦97 |
| 173944070 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 68) | Thank you! commented 2025-10-29 19:27:17 UTC by valaise ♦17 |
| 173899882 (Comments: 2) | agarrett528 (Discussed changesets: 2) | thank you! commented 2025-10-29 18:45:50 UTC by agarrett528 ♦1 |
| 156834765 (Comments: 2) | KDTW Flyer (Discussed changesets: 9) | proceeding, got no response commented 2025-10-29 18:25:30 UTC by notmyproblem1 ♦110 |
| 173908084 (Comments: 1) | jadynm (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Add the flock device as a separate node. I look for the pole's shaddow to place the node. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173908084 commented 2025-10-29 17:09:48 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173865424 (Comments: 1) | Whattaflock (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: The device should be on a stand alone node not on a existing way. I look for the pole's shaddow to determine where to place the node. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1... commented 2025-10-29 16:59:24 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173931914 (Comments: 1) | Agoraphilic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Did this building get destroyed or the address removed? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173931914 commented 2025-10-29 15:37:50 UTC by iandees ♦752 |
| 173931822 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 165) | According to the official source the road should be part of the National Netowrk, however the abundance of signs that state it is prohibited for trucks makes the National Network tags on that road incorrect #OptimoRoute commented 2025-10-29 14:01:38 UTC by TinPetreković ♦180 |
| 173817748 (Comments: 2) | seateaeye (Discussed changesets: 10) | I think I just wasn't careful while editing, thanks for noticing this and correcting it. commented 2025-10-29 13:44:55 UTC by seateaeye ♦4 |
| 173906819 (Comments: 1) | David L Hill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just a heads up, if there's no lane lines, then lane_markings=no should be used, not lanes=2. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173906819 commented 2025-10-29 13:19:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173921295 (Comments: 3) | chriscolemanallstateinsurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | The description tag, or anywhere else in OSM, is a wholly inappropriate venue for ad copy. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173921295 commented 2025-10-29 13:17:57 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173928471 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 165) | The node was accidentally created and it was deleted in changeset 173928592 since it served no purpose https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173928592 commented 2025-10-29 12:58:39 UTC by TinPetreković ♦180 |
| 173899234 (Comments: 1) | CowCowManThingit (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted fictional edits https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173927529 commented 2025-10-29 12:33:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,464 |
| 173921825 (Comments: 2) | TA Hale (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Van Zandt County community location" commented 2025-10-29 10:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173917963 (Comments: 2) | planetjane0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Cannabis dispensary in Ypsilanti Michigan" commented 2025-10-29 09:09:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173206283 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916553 commented 2025-10-29 08:25:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,464 |
| 173206386 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916553 commented 2025-10-29 08:25:17 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,464 |
| 172768921 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916535 commented 2025-10-29 08:24:48 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,464 |
| 172768882 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531 commented 2025-10-29 08:24:43 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,464 |
| 172768863 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531 commented 2025-10-29 08:24:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,464 |
| 172768876 (Comments: 1) | VerifiedUser916 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted fictional places https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173916531 commented 2025-10-29 08:24:42 UTC by Taya_S ♦1,464 |
| 173908996 (Comments: 1) | shreyagandi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6481173570 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-10-29 06:52:35 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173909103 (Comments: 1) | william619 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please refrain from adding private information to OSM and thereby engaging in vandalism. If you want to make meaningful additions, please read the wiki article on addresses https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Addresses and enter them in your a... commented 2025-10-29 06:35:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173909073 (Comments: 1) | william619 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-10-29 06:19:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173909172 (Comments: 1) | TornadoKegan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, why did you delete the buildings rather than updating the geometry of the building? commented 2025-10-29 04:12:51 UTC by QuiLe ♦2 |
| 173257307 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thank you for the valuable feedback. I have reverted the edit . I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you commented 2025-10-29 03:31:16 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173163856 (Comments: 2) | rboda (Discussed changesets: 28) | Apologies for the mistake I committed. Thank you for the valuable feedback. I look forward to your suggestion/feedback in the future as well. Thank you. commented 2025-10-29 03:04:22 UTC by rboda ♦13 |
| 173895726 (Comments: 1) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 72) | Please try and use descriptive changeset comments and avoid acronyms and made up words. OSM is a multilingual project, it is mean to exclude people based on their heritage. --- Published using OSMCha: htt... commented 2025-10-28 22:36:34 UTC by EqualBoat1886 ♦5 |
| 173893629 (Comments: 1) | bohbrat (Discussed changesets: 1) | The "Q" key in the web editor can square those corners for you. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173893629 commented 2025-10-28 21:48:27 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173894387 (Comments: 1) | Playtri St Petersburg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-10-28 20:25:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173894752 (Comments: 1) | AbbyZzz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You changed a fottway to a bench (see https://www.osm.org/way/557849061). I must reverted your change set. Please try it again. commented 2025-10-28 20:22:20 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173898476 (Comments: 1) | jamesbmc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please add the new information to the park area instead of adding an additional point to the park. commented 2025-10-28 20:15:23 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 170457331 (Comments: 1) | Redprintblueprint (Discussed changesets: 1) | u are a bad person fuck u commented 2025-10-28 19:36:09 UTC by CowCowManThingit ♦1 |
| 173885187 (Comments: 1) | alexpharrison (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello welcome to OSM. I wanted to to let you know, a feature being on private property is not a valid reason to remove it. If it exists on the ground it can be include in OSM. Removing features that exist is actually considered vandalism. The ... commented 2025-10-28 18:02:38 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173862950 (Comments: 4) | rpoulsen47 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Nice! Thanks for finding that! commented 2025-10-28 17:42:21 UTC by rpoulsen47 ♦1 |
| 173884879 (Comments: 1) | Blurry Kitteh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi welcome to OSM. Looks like you are removing private roads. This is not correct. Private roads are valid to be mapped in OSM and should not be removed. The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or a... commented 2025-10-28 17:35:33 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173885381 (Comments: 1) | Blurry Kitteh (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi welcome to OSM. Looks like you are removing private roads. This is not correct. Private roads are valid to be mapped in OSM and should not be removed. The correct way to handle this is to use OSM's tagging system. access=private, or a... commented 2025-10-28 17:35:22 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173887104 (Comments: 2) | ConnorGa (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Ion, There's no wear pattern or anything indicating the existence of a footpath, informal or not, and pretty much all grass is traversable. I'm not sure what you mean from a routing perspective, but I think the priority should be... commented 2025-10-28 17:16:44 UTC by ConnorGa ♦2 |
| 157308968 (Comments: 2) | TheBestIdea (Discussed changesets: 70) | Exclusively for bikes. It is very similar to way 1217875370 (except is has a concrete island instead of a painted one). commented 2025-10-28 17:15:27 UTC by TheBestIdea ♦115 |
| 173856687 (Comments: 2) | Alexander Avtanski (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks! Fixed that. commented 2025-10-28 16:40:38 UTC by Alexander Avtanski ♦3 |
| 140397458 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny (Discussed changesets: 551) | confirmed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3854000 commented 2025-10-28 16:38:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,303 |
| 173715973 (Comments: 1) | midget sub (Discussed changesets: 8) | I think highway=path might have been correct, according to the wiki "Paths kept mainly by people repeatedly walking on them, or those that are only minimally constructed, are usually tagged as highway=path" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org... commented 2025-10-28 15:46:19 UTC by jm428 ♦19 |
| 173848853 (Comments: 1) | Soccer's dumb 6 7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is the bridge literally named "Cool Bridge"? If not, then the name=* tag isn't the right tag for that. description=* would be better in that case, though describing why it's cool would be ideal. --- ... commented 2025-10-28 13:57:05 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 173878600 (Comments: 1) | nathpass2002 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. Did you have any more information for a natural = cave_entrance inside of a building? commented 2025-10-28 13:44:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173884150 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 165) | Identical road segmetns were split for no reason since the same truck restricion applies to both of them and there are signs on each end of the West 50th Street. Segments were merged back together in changeset 173884234 https://www.open... commented 2025-10-28 13:42:06 UTC by TinPetreković ♦180 |
| 173876961 (Comments: 2) | lifelonghealth (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Health clinic in Clarendon Hills and Burr Ridge" commented 2025-10-28 10:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173876317 (Comments: 2) | sanprova (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Pest control services in Richmond VA" commented 2025-10-28 10:30:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173782471 (Comments: 2) | Qiu Weiping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM (again)! Please be careful! You moved the two nodes https://www.osm.org/node/8461388253, https://www.osm.org/node/9975077297 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-10-28 08:18:27 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173811620 (Comments: 1) | Sonatagardener (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/12233738856 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome! commented 2025-10-28 08:07:11 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173820594 (Comments: 1) | JacksonMiller03 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lanes. I will delete your change. commented 2025-10-28 07:59:52 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173831533 (Comments: 1) | dankarcherconstruction (Discussed changesets: 1) | ## Reverted ## Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-10-28 07:52:22 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173861208 (Comments: 1) | Yomapman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please don't overpaint an existing street for renaming. I correct your modification commented 2025-10-28 07:24:15 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173866900 (Comments: 1) | Axcess Accident Center of Provo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! I remove your entry, because you are not part of a praking slot. For a better description (if you can't find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-10-28 07:05:33 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 154959926 (Comments: 2) | ratrun (Discussed changesets: 155) | Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. In this changeset, I fixed an obviously wrong edit. Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171146756#map=18/35.178579/-106.543897&layers=VN was connected with this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/n... commented 2025-10-28 03:48:19 UTC by ratrun ♦250 |
| 173862876 (Comments: 1) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 8) | thank you! commented 2025-10-28 02:50:00 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| 167157565 (Comments: 3) | ZeLonewolf (Discussed changesets: 152) | Yes, this is the sign. - The "No Trespassing" sign in the background is meant for the forest adjacent to the road; not the road itself. - The Title 31 definition of "Private road" is to be interpreted as the definition in th... commented 2025-10-28 02:26:50 UTC by aduxas ♦37 |
| 173777769 (Comments: 1) | campbelltree (Discussed changesets: 2) | Actual source: private correspondence with HOA --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173777769 commented 2025-10-28 02:05:17 UTC by campbelltree ♦22 |
| 173698505 (Comments: 1) | bluehoneybees (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello there! The changes mostly looks good, except for the one use of 'surface=ground' on way/1444414047 - use an actual descriptive tag, not the generic 'paved' 'unpaved' 'ground'. The other thing to notice is... commented 2025-10-28 01:44:30 UTC by campbelltree ♦22 |
| 88604290 (Comments: 1) | ppjj Imports+NHD (Discussed changesets: 16) | I just noticed that your NHD import was added (2020) after my mapping of the Tununak River and tribs. (2017). I wish you had done a better job of checking for existing waterways before the import operation. commented 2025-10-28 00:09:58 UTC by AlaskaDave ♦170 |
| 88604307 (Comments: 1) | ppjj Imports+NHD (Discussed changesets: 16) | I just noticed that your NHD import was added (2020) after my mapping of the Tununak River and tribs. (2017). I wish you had done a better job of checking for existing waterways before the import operation. commented 2025-10-28 00:06:03 UTC by AlaskaDave ♦170 |
| 173070480 (Comments: 2) | VeryFakeName (Discussed changesets: 1) | The trail is real. I hiked the entirety of it commented 2025-10-27 22:42:46 UTC by VeryFakeName ♦1 |
| 173697375 (Comments: 1) | Dblcut3 (Discussed changesets: 21) | thanks for the update; went to do it myself and saw you already had :D commented 2025-10-27 22:31:50 UTC by skorasaurus ♦217 |
| 173290846 (Comments: 1) | deusjz (Discussed changesets: 2) | I think this should be at least partially reverted. The bike lanes here are on the street and are better represented by tags on the street's Way. In notes on OSM Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_features , there is a discus... commented 2025-10-27 21:55:21 UTC by aldimond ♦4 |
| 173854743 (Comments: 1) | Devin Markley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please don't reclassify a residential road just because it intersects the two carriageways of one road. An unnamed road that does this would be classified as a tertiary LINK, but this road is clearly not unnamed. Thanks! https://ww... commented 2025-10-27 21:44:55 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦118 |
| 173848870 (Comments: 1) | lwfsu71 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2025-10-27 20:27:59 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 173814143 (Comments: 1) | arihein2024 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I see that you've added sidewalk:[side] tagging to one or more sidewalks. I haven't seen that tagging scheme before; I've only seen it used on roadways to indicate that there's a sidewalk to the left or right of the ... commented 2025-10-27 20:04:03 UTC by MapAwayThePain ♦12 |
| 173855347 (Comments: 1) | Strongthany (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please remove, I added address to wrong location. commented 2025-10-27 20:02:10 UTC by Strongthany ♦3 |
| 173852685 (Comments: 2) | Tulip Bloom Boutique (Discussed changesets: 1) | For example, a more neutral and factual version of your description could be: "Tulip Bloom Boutique women's clothing and accessories store in West Des Moines IA" commented 2025-10-27 18:48:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173848602 (Comments: 1) | StefanoHatari (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi in this changeset you dragged a lot of nodes out of place while trying to add a camera. This is the 2nd time you have done this. Always check the Warning and Changes section to see what changes you have made before clicking publish! ... commented 2025-10-27 18:20:41 UTC by MassCartog ♦217 |
| 173817909 (Comments: 3) | LizArtjuh (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. --- ... commented 2025-10-27 16:59:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173789792 (Comments: 3) | Aleksei Besogonov (Discussed changesets: 1) | The building outline is already tagged with the address. It just doesn't render so you can see it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173789792 commented 2025-10-27 16:54:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173738686 (Comments: 4) | Tim Niblett (Discussed changesets: 4) | You're right, I re-read it. I've removed all of the bikeways and checked the road tags for bike lanes. commented 2025-10-27 15:38:09 UTC by Tim Niblett ♦4 |
| 173547777 (Comments: 2) | dmjab13 (Discussed changesets: 2) | i mean, sure, but the baseball fields look so pretty when i mark the outfield as sports centre and the dirt as the pitch, lol commented 2025-10-27 14:51:17 UTC by dmjab13 ♦21 |
| 173332203 (Comments: 1) | BMoney2 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why did you mark the current Shands Bridge as motorway? It's not grade separated from local traffic. commented 2025-10-27 10:13:19 UTC by OrdinaryScarlett ♦14 |
| 173826804 (Comments: 2) | tanksnyc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just to help illustrate what I mean, here is how your description could look in a more neutral, factual form: "Environmental services company" commented 2025-10-27 08:54:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 171984822 (Comments: 8) | Michael N (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for the clarification. Just to be clear, when I said “treated as a public street,” I wasn’t referring to ownership — only that it’s listed in the city’s GIS as a named street and used for addresses. I unders... commented 2025-10-27 03:29:27 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦124 |
| 173811964 (Comments: 4) | ion_chi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Yes, exactly. No problem commented 2025-10-27 01:57:52 UTC by ion_chi ♦35 |
| 173792705 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 388) | That would be my typo 😆 Good catch, thanks! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173792705 commented 2025-10-27 01:09:50 UTC by Kinsio ♦24 |
| 172679720 (Comments: 1) | Michael N (Discussed changesets: 6) | Soden Place should be listed as a pedestrian street — it’s shown in the city’s GIS map and has properties that use that address. commented 2025-10-27 00:28:29 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦124 |
| 173465063 (Comments: 1) | KB-01 (Discussed changesets: 35) | This changeset messed up the turn restrictions at Wootton Parkway & Fleet Street, though some popular routers were still able to guess what was intended. I fixed the turn restrictions in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173815915 . commented 2025-10-26 23:48:14 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦73 |
| 173809414 (Comments: 2) | kevin open street (Discussed changesets: 1) | The chance of it being re-added is very unlikely. The habitat/environment was restored. commented 2025-10-26 22:36:32 UTC by matthewfecica ♦6 |
| 173810887 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 53) | I'm guessing the error was caused by TIGER misalignment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup/Alignment) and the TIGER tags were intended to apply to the northern way, so I moved the TIGER tags rather than just deleting them, FWIW. commented 2025-10-26 20:16:56 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦73 |
| 173727627 (Comments: 4) | Halfdeaf007 (Discussed changesets: 12) | I didn't say that you can't, I said that it's less detail to have it where the nodes intersect. Do you have a good reason for why less detail would be preferable? commented 2025-10-26 19:45:56 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦53 |
| 173777095 (Comments: 1) | JeffKirk (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: driveways typically are not named, but you could add your address to the building so software can route you to your home. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173777095 ... commented 2025-10-26 19:33:06 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173791099 (Comments: 2) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 8) | Looks like it got dragged and merged. Un-merged. commented 2025-10-26 18:09:12 UTC by ICT_maps ♦6 |
| 173802365 (Comments: 2) | Lusent (Discussed changesets: 1) | There is also a new black mailbox for this address on the road at GPS approx. 36.852957453323015 -81.74456238258507 commented 2025-10-26 16:24:38 UTC by Lusent ♦1 |
| 173738604 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 195) | OSM doesn't exactly have a threshold for how much population a place needs to be classified as a city. Wyoming has no cities that come close to passing 100k in population, but has 10 places tagged as cities in OSM. Colorado itself has a notable ... commented 2025-10-26 14:11:29 UTC by Joseph R P ♦378 |
| 173493224 (Comments: 1) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 9) | Note on adding track/access roads on private farmland - please make sure to mark the access as "private" as these are not publicly accessible paths (off South Branch Rd near Norz Hill Farm) - thanks. commented 2025-10-26 12:43:08 UTC by vngx32 ♦2 |
| 173612465 (Comments: 3) | Trusted Heating & Air Conditioning (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637880 commented 2025-10-26 10:15:36 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173621915 (Comments: 3) | Jersey Behavioral Health (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637387 commented 2025-10-26 10:15:14 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173622667 (Comments: 4) | kinggatesbuilders (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173637254 commented 2025-10-26 10:14:48 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173628487 (Comments: 3) | Door Pros (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173636875 commented 2025-10-26 10:13:02 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173654141 (Comments: 4) | davewarrencdjr (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173657427 commented 2025-10-26 10:11:55 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173659284 (Comments: 3) | Thomas Hodgkiss (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173681642 commented 2025-10-26 10:10:56 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173668575 (Comments: 3) | Southern VIP & Foot Rescue Surgery Center Fulton KY (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173680482 commented 2025-10-26 10:09:18 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173671349 (Comments: 3) | Valence coatings (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/173786696 where the changeset comment is: Remove unclear map edits commented 2025-10-26 10:08:39 UTC by NeisRevert ♦314 |
| 173672944 (Comments: 3) | Dr Thomas Hodgkiss (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173786659 commented 2025-10-26 10:07:56 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173703648 (Comments: 3) | Desaihealth (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173717592 commented 2025-10-26 10:06:32 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173742093 (Comments: 3) | Jerrit Burgess (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👎 (Partly) Reverted due to lack of response from the original contributor by https://osm.org/changeset/173786465 commented 2025-10-26 10:03:57 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173742371 (Comments: 3) | OnPoint Solar Panel Cleaning Encinitas (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173743111 commented 2025-10-26 10:03:29 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173743357 (Comments: 4) | Shane Adam Thompson (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173764259 commented 2025-10-26 10:02:53 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173754929 (Comments: 3) | Heliodore Houenou (Discussed changesets: 1) | ✅ Corrected by https://osm.org/changeset/173768882 commented 2025-10-26 10:00:52 UTC by NeisReview ♦1,328 |
| 173777632 (Comments: 1) | Loweball (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please check that the entry is correct. The aerial photograph shows a damaged building with poor transport links. commented 2025-10-26 08:09:19 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173769603 (Comments: 1) | NC Locksmith Experts (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You only added the name of a business to the building, but did not note that there is also a business there. If you do not know the spelling of the tag, please look it up in the wiki https://wiki.osm.org. commented 2025-10-26 08:05:46 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173780082 (Comments: 1) | camman29 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11646934645 (a tree) more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome! Please have also a look on https://w... commented 2025-10-26 07:42:51 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173727701 (Comments: 1) | SD Mapman (Discussed changesets: 30) | Great job, looks like we’re almost done with all the townships East River! commented 2025-10-26 05:35:24 UTC by Molandfreak ♦13 |
| 173776604 (Comments: 1) | S-zation (Discussed changesets: 32) | reverted by c/s 173777252 after additional research commented 2025-10-26 01:22:03 UTC by S-zation ♦117 |
| 173733446 (Comments: 1) | seakid6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: add the address to the house outline. Just select the outline in the editor and fill in the address fields. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173733446 commented 2025-10-26 00:19:08 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 162031932 (Comments: 5) | Saintry17 (Discussed changesets: 2) | They’ll always show, but the segments through the gates should prevent people from being routed through there. Heads up, though….there’s a lot of road construction going on in the port. commented 2025-10-25 23:44:46 UTC by txemt ♦75 |
| 161803589 (Comments: 1) | Mystik8973 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Does this Flock camera on Meriden Road in Wolcott still exist? I've checked mapillary.com streetview imagery from March 7, 2025 and did not see anything in front of the Hertz. Thank you! commented 2025-10-25 22:00:12 UTC by S-zation ♦117 |
| 173624406 (Comments: 1) | StrikeMind (Discussed changesets: 5) | reverted. please provide a source for major road deletions https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173771486 commented 2025-10-25 20:30:38 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,127 |
| 172439522 (Comments: 4) | vngx32 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I think there's some subjectivity, rather than a hard rule, whether driveway can be used when shared between two adjacent residences. There are plenty of examples in the forums and questions online where the OSM community supports using service/... commented 2025-10-25 19:32:31 UTC by vngx32 ♦2 |
| 173761745 (Comments: 1) | Partsguy74 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station commented 2025-10-25 18:53:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173766527 (Comments: 1) | Rcordero1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OSM. I just want to apologize that I deleted your baseball diamond. The baseball field was already drawn and that's what we normally map for baseball pitches, and having two on top of each other is kind of confusing. If you wa... commented 2025-10-25 18:06:35 UTC by gpserror ♦224 |
| 173724598 (Comments: 2) | Benji Gillman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the feedback and the welcome! Yes, I see I've used an incorrect tag. I'll check the wiki more from now on 👍 I'll remove that tag now. commented 2025-10-25 10:37:52 UTC by Benji Gillman ♦1 |
| 173732022 (Comments: 2) | draconic_mapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, thanks for finding that. It means I should have taken a break from mapping earlier :P It was a mistake while entering name, I typed over the key instead of the value in the dialog ;) I have fixed it, along with the street next to it where the sam... commented 2025-10-25 10:21:10 UTC by draconic_mapper ♦6 |
| 173747498 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.buckeyeaz.gov/government/city-clerk/mayor-and-council/see-a-map-of-district-boundaries commented 2025-10-25 09:34:50 UTC by ieguy3 ♦6 |
| 173728353 (Comments: 1) | NachoGtz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please be careful! You moved the four nodes more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I must reverted your chnge set. Please take a new try to add ALPR withwout destroying the existing streets. commented 2025-10-25 07:55:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173729540 (Comments: 1) | natergibson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice a name isn't a address! Did you see https://www.osm.org/way/419909888? Please move a address to the main building, not to the street crossing. commented 2025-10-25 07:48:38 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173733870 (Comments: 1) | DZehavi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thanks for your modification. Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/18068055, https://www.osm.org/way/35415556. There are still road overlaps here that cannot be resolved without local knowledge. commented 2025-10-25 07:36:02 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173733789 (Comments: 2) | Swell Air Conditioning (Discussed changesets: 2) | PLUS also please REMOVE the payment:cryptocurrencies=yes ! The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NOT accepted. Source: ... commented 2025-10-25 07:27:37 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 173734163 (Comments: 1) | Swell Air Conditioning (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2025-10-25 07:26:14 UTC by Comino ♦202 |
| 173739666 (Comments: 1) | JustinJBrown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition! Please move the node to the main building. Could please add also the key religion, denormination, service_times? commented 2025-10-25 07:08:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 173740425 (Comments: 1) | ydounot90 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/11552533563 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position. If you need help, you are welcome! commented 2025-10-25 06:54:54 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |
| 172216922 (Comments: 1) | wolfy1339 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Même si le projet d'interchange est en pause, l'imagerie aérienne détaillée du MERN montre que la station d'interconnexion (chemin 1219412604) est pratiquement complétée. Il est important &agr... commented 2025-10-25 01:58:05 UTC by PierZen ♦272 |
| 173739077 (Comments: 2) | thd10045 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Based on your map edits in this changeset, I’ve drafted a suggestion for what a comment could look like: "Removed toilet facility" commented 2025-10-25 00:46:28 UTC by NeisBot ♦3,142 |
| 173686299 (Comments: 1) | pnwcascades (Discussed changesets: 5) | We don't use descriptive names, like closed landfill. Instead tag it as landuse=landfill + disued=yes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dlandfill --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2025-10-25 00:06:59 UTC by Glassman ♦5,448 |
| 173585975 (Comments: 1) | soloeye (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please don’t adjust road types based on navigation system behavior. Classifications should reflect real-world conditions, not routing outcomes. commented 2025-10-25 00:04:39 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦124 |
| 171244770 (Comments: 1) | AstroSinclaire (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverting changes so that it matches actual condition on roads. There are cycle paths/lanes here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173738686 commented 2025-10-24 23:57:24 UTC by Tim Niblett ♦4 |
| 173737316 (Comments: 1) | David L Hill (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oops, didn't mean to botch that! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173737316 commented 2025-10-24 23:54:04 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,208 |
| 172773459 (Comments: 1) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 5) | Just wanted to comment: I reverted N Empire Rd and Bard Creek Rd Back to tertiary since both the county and my Public Works contact at the town of Empire classify these two main roads as arterial roads for the area, as they connect Bard Creek Valley/... commented 2025-10-24 23:41:48 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦5 |
| 163836445 (Comments: 2) | ion_chi (Discussed changesets: 8) | Please delete it. It was probably a heatmap artifact commented 2025-10-24 20:18:48 UTC by ion_chi ♦35 |
| 173296247 (Comments: 5) | PWSpaces (Discussed changesets: 1) | Let me check into that and see if I can get some solid advice for you. Would you mind messaging me on OpenStreetMap (not in this changeset, as it's public) with your email address so I can follow up with you there? commented 2025-10-24 18:58:32 UTC by MapAwayThePain ♦12 |
| 173645787 (Comments: 2) | jumbanho (Discussed changesets: 19) | Thanks! commented 2025-10-24 18:55:34 UTC by jumbanho ♦149 |
| 170006242 (Comments: 2) | Map_Rivers (Discussed changesets: 200) | reverted edits that added suspect data, it is from a suspect account, as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166617410 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164649036 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163053969 remain not answer... commented 2025-10-24 17:48:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,303 |
| 173724520 (Comments: 1) | Discount House Furniture (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/162153490 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-10-24 16:54:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,212 |