| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 183376803 (Comments: 1) | mccflute (Discussed changesets: 1) | Instead of adding the ALPR to the buiding, it should just be a node. Can you fix this edit? Let me know if you need help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183376803 ... commented 2026-05-30 22:34:02 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 127073167 (Comments: 3) | Belle Haven Mapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood, and I agree with everything you said. I probably just missed it. Thanks! commented 2026-05-30 22:14:51 UTC by arichnad ♦41 |
| 183407010 (Comments: 1) | MarkM10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-30 21:18:39 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183407209 (Comments: 1) | MarkM10 (Discussed changesets: 3) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-30 21:16:29 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183327487 (Comments: 1) | pj4070 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you mentioned in your note that you source the name from Google Streetview, but that data is copyrighted and not allowed on OSM. I went ahead and reverted this change commented 2026-05-30 20:59:54 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦16 |
| 161484047 (Comments: 1) | Soccer Asylum (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with promotional, misleading and nonsense tagging in changeset 183417711 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183417711 commented 2026-05-30 20:37:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 161376117 (Comments: 1) | Soccer Asylum (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted adding SEO spam POI with promotional, misleading and nonsense tagging in changeset 183417711 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183417711 commented 2026-05-30 20:37:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 183330900 (Comments: 6) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 95) | Oh yeah, some ways got deleted during the revert too. I used streetside imagery to confirm the surfaces on some segments of sidewalk, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1524104611/history And I'd also added some crossings, which got d... commented 2026-05-30 18:32:26 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦13 |
| 183412917 (Comments: 1) | EliteMooseTaskForce (Discussed changesets: 2) | Are transit schedules allowed in OpenStreetMap? For instance: arrival and departure times? commented 2026-05-30 18:28:24 UTC by EliteMooseTaskForce ♦2 |
| 183346083 (Comments: 1) | Viktoryia Kaluhina (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Viktoryia, mappers in Utah as a local community have already worked very hard to correct all TIGER names in Utah, as it did a very poor job of handling our street names (In this case, "University Village" is the name of the complex, not ... commented 2026-05-30 18:27:29 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦104 |
| 183412272 (Comments: 1) | EliteMooseTaskForce (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is this good? This is my first time contributing to openstreetmap! commented 2026-05-30 18:10:09 UTC by EliteMooseTaskForce ♦2 |
| 162680094 (Comments: 2) | Aenet (Discussed changesets: 17) | I named it that because I saw signs that point to it saying “food scrap drop off”. I’d be okay with the “name” tag being removed, I really don’t think what is essentially a compost bin needs a name commented 2026-05-30 17:36:04 UTC by Aenet ♦23 |
| 183377177 (Comments: 2) | BTMapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | It does not have a name, similar to the campground of 3 tent sites just south. They are both dispersed camping on a first come, first served basis. commented 2026-05-30 17:10:47 UTC by BTMapper ♦1 |
| 183367525 (Comments: 1) | Nancy Mickleberry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Nancy: Welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contributions to this neighborhood. Please take a look at the following regarding how not to use the name=* tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_render... commented 2026-05-30 16:33:54 UTC by bdentremont ♦63 |
| 183354290 (Comments: 1) | jgphaneuf (Discussed changesets: 1) | The semantics of `no` for access are that walking or biking there is disallowed by signage or law, so it should probably not be applied here. The presence of a sidewalk with `bicycle=yes` should generally be enough for router not to recommend the bri... commented 2026-05-30 14:39:32 UTC by John Kastner ♦63 |
| 162775762 (Comments: 4) | PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad (Discussed changesets: 2) | There are no "alcohol shops" in New York. You may serve beer, wine, and spirits at a bar. You may not sell beer, wine, and spirits for home consumption all from the same store, so the tag shop=alcohol does not apply. commented 2026-05-30 11:32:34 UTC by PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad ♦2 |
| 183393047 (Comments: 2) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 43) | Tagging the road with bicycle=yes would be fine, but unnecessary because all roads in the area allow cycling by default. commented 2026-05-30 10:19:50 UTC by pesticides ♦51 |
| 171022154 (Comments: 1) | Eric Ramos Law PLLC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed additional SEO spam tags and corrected others for Eric Ramos Law office POI in changeset 183391313 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183391313 commented 2026-05-30 09:39:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 161477188 (Comments: 1) | Clean Recovery Centers Sarasota (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam image=* tag, fixed malformed addr:street=* and disambiguated mobile=* in changeset 183390547 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183390547 commented 2026-05-30 09:21:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 161218690 (Comments: 1) | Will Graham (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam description=* from Nashville Appliance Rental POI (and tagged building=* appropriately) in changeset 183390261 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183390261 commented 2026-05-30 09:15:53 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 183327655 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 208) | Oh. "Frewway" is 100% a typo. I meant "Freeway." commented 2026-05-30 06:53:32 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦248 |
| 183272416 (Comments: 1) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2qQu. What is the mean of the tag UNITNUM? What is the difference to addr:unit ? commented 2026-05-30 06:04:09 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,573 |
| 176912102 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 131) | Thanks for fixing up the flags in front of the air museum! commented 2026-05-30 04:38:05 UTC by watmildon ♦308 |
| 182527044 (Comments: 4) | cubbe8 (Discussed changesets: 95) | It’s all done now, been fixed commented 2026-05-30 02:48:48 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 182731918 (Comments: 1) | Btian Paul Dorsam (Discussed changesets: 4) | this is yard industrial track part of NYA Fresh Pond Yard no longer a branch line. commented 2026-05-30 02:20:23 UTC by RailandSea ♦23 |
| 182948572 (Comments: 1) | AeonicB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, please be careful with reclassifying roads as the different types of roads form a hierarchy of importance. Tertiary, secondary, and primary roads are all different forms of major roadways while residential and minor/unclassified roads are vari... commented 2026-05-30 02:14:23 UTC by Joseph R P ♦432 |
| 183379012 (Comments: 1) | Fizzie-DWG (Discussed changesets: 141) | I guess I must have forgotten to mention in the report that I already manually removed the remaining SEO spam tags for their changesets, so it seems I ended up wasting both of our times here without anything to show for it. Oh well--lesson learned fo... commented 2026-05-30 01:58:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 156835326 (Comments: 1) | jztrailg (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. Is "access road" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282335763 access=no? do you have a website or map that corroborates this? commented 2026-05-30 01:14:20 UTC by SherbetS ♦158 |
| 180443454 (Comments: 4) | Pinnacle Periodontics and Dental Implants (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent SEO spam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183379012 commented 2026-05-30 00:51:16 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,911 |
| 183331395 (Comments: 1) | cederbs (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: square bldgs by selecting the outline then just type a "q" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183331395 commented 2026-05-30 00:26:39 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183327935 (Comments: 1) | aConfusedAmpwave (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time unabbreviating --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183327935 commented 2026-05-30 00:24:22 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183320934 (Comments: 1) | Hailey Calixtro (Discussed changesets: 2) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. reverted edit ... commented 2026-05-30 00:21:31 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183319624 (Comments: 1) | Hailey Calixtro (Discussed changesets: 2) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Reverted changeset... commented 2026-05-30 00:20:57 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183376825 (Comments: 3) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | Sounds reasonable. We'll see if the other user has information to the contrary. commented 2026-05-29 23:50:42 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183371620 (Comments: 3) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | Cool, thanks! commented 2026-05-29 23:49:12 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183367422 (Comments: 1) | cipherchief (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks! Re: navigation searches (also known as geocoding), depending on what app you're using, you can expect it to be updated in a couple weeks or more with new data—a lot of apps (CoMaps, OSMAnd, etc.) only process and download new data ... commented 2026-05-29 22:43:07 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183368012 (Comments: 2) | cipherchief (Discussed changesets: 2) | It looks like it is based on their website, so I moved WPC to that building instead of at the Our Lady gym. I added more details to the campus as well—your edits were mostly good, my edits just built on top of them. I don't b... commented 2026-05-29 22:40:01 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183279091 (Comments: 1) | UtMtnMan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gentec LPR cameras on BYU property as you exit to University Ave from the OIT and Philanthropy Buildings. Almost certainly owned by BYU. commented 2026-05-29 22:31:28 UTC by UtMtnMan ♦2 |
| 183279083 (Comments: 1) | UtMtnMan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Gentec LPR cameras on BYU property as you enter towards the OIT and Philanthropy Buildings. Almost certainly owned by BYU. commented 2026-05-29 22:30:13 UTC by UtMtnMan ♦2 |
| 183130803 (Comments: 1) | brooke10101010 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Another user has set this back to vegan only in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183376825. Please comment there to explain why you think this place is not exclusively vegan. Thanks! commented 2026-05-29 22:28:20 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183376170 (Comments: 2) | recollect124 (Discussed changesets: 1) | South row of detached homes have North facing carports, again separation on Tuner Street. commented 2026-05-29 21:52:06 UTC by recollect124 ♦1 |
| 183360549 (Comments: 1) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 33) | the url for the image linked to the building way and the node are broken, "osition=0&yposition=380&rw=768&rh=430.jpg" is not a valid url, please update it to point to the correct url. happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-29 21:14:12 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183367255 (Comments: 1) | Gravityslc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Based off this being in slc it's probably a motorola rather than a flock. Are you able to check the reference images on this page and confirm? https://deflock.org/identify. Thanks for adding. I think there's still a few unmapped hid... commented 2026-05-29 20:03:49 UTC by HashFerret ♦16 |
| 183279767 (Comments: 2) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Acknowledged. commented 2026-05-29 19:45:26 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦16 |
| 183335024 (Comments: 1) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks. In OpenStreetMap at least in the United States, we include the country code (1) and use hyphens for every group, like so: +1-206-708-6637. I've updated this one's format. Thanks for the contribution! commented 2026-05-29 19:29:19 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183353539 (Comments: 2) | MikeBockserman (Discussed changesets: 8) | https://imgur.com/a/ovSMFEf commented 2026-05-29 19:28:43 UTC by gfletcherces ♦1 |
| 183233392 (Comments: 1) | eugenenine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, aren't these nodes milestones? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmilestone There's also no tag like "distance units" - you have to add the unit directly in the "distance" tag. commented 2026-05-29 18:00:01 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183308734 (Comments: 1) | Glassfrog (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding data around Appleton! In this changeset, you added some sidewalks that double back on themselves, but they shouldn't be drawn that way. It's OK to stop a line, then start a new one! Also, I not... commented 2026-05-29 16:11:05 UTC by neuhausr ♦354 |
| 173502147 (Comments: 1) | ClockRoach (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the survey and edits! commented 2026-05-29 16:09:44 UTC by ElliottPlack ♦939 |
| 183159466 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 45) | Wrong tag, changed in changeset/183348504 commented 2026-05-29 10:43:38 UTC by JakovRajić ♦37 |
| 183340191 (Comments: 1) | Viktoryia Kaluhina (Discussed changesets: 2) | *Added road alt name according to Bing Streetside commented 2026-05-29 09:22:45 UTC by Viktoryia Kaluhina ♦1 |
| 183319080 (Comments: 1) | user567843 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183342983 commented 2026-05-29 09:02:13 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183324288 (Comments: 1) | Roadtonowherelv (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I deleted all the wrong added crypto tags. Tags like "payment:bitcoin=yes" are deprecated. Use ISO 4217-style codes. Happy mapping, Edwin Comino BTC Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Comino commented 2026-05-29 07:04:31 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 182985958 (Comments: 1) | jellyfish twink (Discussed changesets: 6) | natural=wood should generally not go on parcel boundaries as the "woods" are not bounded by this. Thanks. commented 2026-05-29 04:59:44 UTC by TomPar ♦124 |
| 156086658 (Comments: 1) | ReVIDA Recovery Center - Morristown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed/fixed SEO spam tags and corrected/split out name=* in changeset 183332726 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332726 commented 2026-05-29 04:20:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 162230770 (Comments: 1) | ReVIDA® Recovery - Tullahoma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam tags and corrected/split out name=* in changeset 183332639 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332639 commented 2026-05-29 04:17:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 160935709 (Comments: 1) | ReVIDA® Recovery Sparta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam tags and corrected/split out name=* in changeset 183332470 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332470 commented 2026-05-29 04:10:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 160886527 (Comments: 1) | Movers Development (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed nonsense name=* added to building by SEO account in changeset 183332373 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332373 commented 2026-05-29 04:06:35 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 160843468 (Comments: 1) | Premiere Dental (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted SEO spam tags and blatantly promotional description=* added to POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332312 commented 2026-05-29 04:04:15 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 160843076 (Comments: 1) | Premiere Dental (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted SEO spam tags and blatantly promotional description=* added to POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332299 commented 2026-05-29 04:03:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 160843054 (Comments: 1) | Premiere Dental (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted SEO spam tags and blatantly promotional description=* added to POI https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332289 commented 2026-05-29 04:03:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 183261646 (Comments: 4) | EvanRoss41 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply, No need for pictures, I believe you. I'm going to restore the part of the road that still exists to the south. When it is actually removed from the ground feel free to remove the rest of it! Thanks commented 2026-05-29 03:57:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦396 |
| 160802029 (Comments: 1) | The Tint Shop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted inexplicable removal of building=* tag by SEO spam account https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183332128 commented 2026-05-29 03:56:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 183271894 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Revert of 183271087 commented 2026-05-29 01:51:39 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183268034 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 208) | A road with full or near full access control is typically an expressway by default. As I said it is a case-by-case basis but a fairly common type of expressway are roads that would otherwise be motorways or be a continuation of a motorway if not some... commented 2026-05-29 01:23:30 UTC by Joseph R P ♦432 |
| 183327486 (Comments: 1) | pootriarch (Discussed changesets: 35) | bike route 45 relation looks like a mess. it has bits of northbound and southbound octavia mixed in, and lots of gaps. i made sure to fix my own split, but is the route supposed to be linear? a loop? commented 2026-05-28 23:14:06 UTC by pootriarch ♦28 |
| 183281688 (Comments: 2) | bogardpd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the info! I believe I've now updated them in accordance with the naming conventions, let me know if it still needs correction. commented 2026-05-28 23:03:58 UTC by bogardpd ♦1 |
| 183326407 (Comments: 2) | GeoVern (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction: Roslyn Place is the correct name, Roslyn Terrace is not a valid street. I've made a separate edit to fix that issue. commented 2026-05-28 22:35:39 UTC by GeoVern ♦1 |
| 179557054 (Comments: 1) | jellyfish twink (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi there! The element you have edited is not for the municipality of Hawley. That would be (https://www.osm.org/relation/1839615), and it is currently tagged with border_type=town to represent what kind of municipality it is. The element you h... commented 2026-05-28 22:19:50 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦67 |
| 183325481 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 15) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4941503 commented 2026-05-28 21:31:36 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦19 |
| 170813898 (Comments: 2) | Ronyu (Discussed changesets: 2) | its been a while but I'm pretty sure its from the image at the bottom of this website: https://www.orlandgrassland.org/looking-at-the-land#dataItem-ipq3q9ei commented 2026-05-28 21:12:07 UTC by Ronyu ♦1 |
| 183323018 (Comments: 1) | Rainbow Phoenix (Discussed changesets: 1) | No clue how to delete this. Was placed in wrong spot. commented 2026-05-28 20:27:39 UTC by Rainbow Phoenix ♦1 |
| 183306163 (Comments: 1) | BestDoc (Discussed changesets: 2) | This dentists office already existed on the map, by adding another copy of it you duplicated it, that is generally discouraged. It would have been better if you had modified the existing object. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-28 19:36:46 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183319534 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | the church isn't the only tenant of this building, so i wouldn't tag the whole thing based on the church. also landuse doesn't go on buildings --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCh... commented 2026-05-28 18:54:51 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183319490 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | sorry, landuse doesn't go on buildings either. the whole property --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183319490 commented 2026-05-28 18:54:04 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 182999832 (Comments: 1) | MVEMJSUNP (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi, it looks like you've been doing a lot of editing in this area, thanks! Wondering if you could adjust the buildings on Broadway so they don't overlap the sidewalk? It looks like a lot of buildings are traced to the roofline (which is dis... commented 2026-05-28 18:30:57 UTC by neuhausr ♦354 |
| 183282947 (Comments: 1) | User67676767editor (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please use the changeset description to describe what you changed and why; for example, "Added the correct name of a café, after visiting." You can find more examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik... commented 2026-05-28 18:26:28 UTC by impiaaa ♦471 |
| 183271345 (Comments: 1) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hi, please check this area, it got only strange tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1523748915 commented 2026-05-28 18:25:31 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183276017 (Comments: 1) | WrenC (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks for fixing so many of these building shapes! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183276017 commented 2026-05-28 18:02:29 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183314892 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | landuse doesn't belong on POI nodes. also, this is a case where the OSM tag and US english don't perfectly align. i would actually tag this as education=kindergarten and drop the amenity tag --- ... commented 2026-05-28 17:54:32 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183315944 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI. you could tag the church property area, though --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183315944 commented 2026-05-28 17:50:35 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183316643 (Comments: 1) | saraihdez (Discussed changesets: 15) | the landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183316643 commented 2026-05-28 17:50:01 UTC by jcarlson ♦134 |
| 183271222 (Comments: 1) | Roobidium (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183271222 commented 2026-05-28 17:02:59 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183314923 (Comments: 1) | Aethonatic (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wrong links provided. Actual changesets are https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171251063 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171251078. commented 2026-05-28 16:55:20 UTC by Aethonatic ♦52 |
| 183235763 (Comments: 1) | Daviskj (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Davis, There are a bunch of problems with your course edits and I wanted to point them out so that you can correct your mapping on future projects. 1. You're deleting other people's work. For instance, there are some green ... commented 2026-05-28 15:59:37 UTC by b-jazz ♦873 |
| 182622455 (Comments: 2) | carlosguerrero_lyft (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, cubbe8, My name is Carlos, and I’m part of the OSM team here at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out regarding these edits, and thank you for the feedback. The concrete curbs and impact attenuators (which match our internal telemetry)... commented 2026-05-28 15:51:53 UTC by carlosguerrero_lyft ♦4 |
| 167720534 (Comments: 1) | travelhike (Discussed changesets: 9) | hello please use man_made=mast + tower:type=communication for describing objects such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12920600376 The man_made=communication tag is for very large structures that are only common in europe commented 2026-05-28 15:37:22 UTC by SherbetS ♦158 |
| 183237081 (Comments: 1) | DividedFrame (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks Frame, But please make sure you don't intersect golf features. One of your water areas was overlapping a fairway on a golf course. The intersection of the two was declared as both water and grass at the same time. Instead, share th... commented 2026-05-28 15:26:42 UTC by b-jazz ♦873 |
| 183237031 (Comments: 2) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | Oops, done. commented 2026-05-28 14:58:09 UTC by brianstrauch ♦3 |
| 183309310 (Comments: 1) | PlausibleParaphenalia (Discussed changesets: 3) | Plan to add the multitude of missing buildings and houses in my neighborhood. commented 2026-05-28 14:38:03 UTC by PlausibleParaphenalia ♦3 |
| 182179303 (Comments: 2) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi again! I noticed that this changeset re-adds the crosswalk at Belle Mead-Blawenburg Road and Skillman near the post office. Just a heads-up from a local mapper: this crosswalk no longer exists on the ground. It was removed during a repaving... commented 2026-05-28 11:47:11 UTC by vngx32 ♦5 |
| 183270283 (Comments: 1) | 1luhgodchild (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:183298075 commented 2026-05-28 10:40:19 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 183180523 (Comments: 3) | Hogmite (Discussed changesets: 3) | "golf_slope" and "golf_rating" and in general "golf_*" are also not used. You can check current statistics on https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ You'll see that these are already used, although only 6 tim... commented 2026-05-28 09:11:32 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183182043 (Comments: 1) | roamingsonaa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, please don't try to add the full menu of some restaurant - OSM is not the right place for that. The food:* tags are meant to point out some categories of food specialities, but not for detailed lists of everything on the menu. commented 2026-05-28 09:03:22 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183274216 (Comments: 4) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/20716 commented 2026-05-28 07:59:01 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
| 183236258 (Comments: 1) | accuratejanitorial (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id: 183289098 commented 2026-05-28 07:29:07 UTC by rajdhani ♦129 |
| 183254579 (Comments: 1) | Gotta Dance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a dancing school? commented 2026-05-28 07:16:31 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183129571 (Comments: 1) | brooke10101010 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks. FWIW, that description doesn't add more information to the map—the affiliation with safeway is already captured in the tag brand=Safeway, and the machine-readable equivalent brand:wikidata=Q1508234. Thanks again for your con... commented 2026-05-28 06:23:20 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183000711 (Comments: 1) | Dpark12300 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. If possible, do try to write more meaningful changeset comments. Other editors do see your changeset comments and it helps a lot to be able to know what you were trying to edit. Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenSt... commented 2026-05-28 06:16:50 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 43812883 (Comments: 1) | Ballard OpenStreetMap (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hey, do you happen to know what you meant by female=no male=no unisex=no on this hairdresser shop? What audience does this shop serve? Is one of those tags incorrect? Thanks! commented 2026-05-28 05:15:57 UTC by pwbriggs ♦277 |
| 183281883 (Comments: 1) | Mxdanger (Discussed changesets: 27) | Master edit can be found here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183280765 commented 2026-05-28 02:30:35 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
| 183280100 (Comments: 1) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281883 commented 2026-05-28 02:27:52 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
| 183280285 (Comments: 1) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281883 commented 2026-05-28 02:27:45 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
| 169047704 (Comments: 1) | Murphi AI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Changeset 169067912 fixed the rest of the SEO spam; I fixed the invalid building=* tag in changeset 183281677 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169067912 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183281677 commented 2026-05-28 02:14:03 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183190093 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 14) | Partially Revert of 183176584 commented 2026-05-28 01:58:11 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 183237554 (Comments: 1) | Anton Owner (Discussed changesets: 1) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. removed bad seo ed... commented 2026-05-28 01:54:00 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183236087 (Comments: 1) | Bropple (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: house outlines should follow the roof line. Plus, if you select the outline then just type a "q" the building will be square. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/1832... commented 2026-05-28 01:48:42 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183233192 (Comments: 1) | Paprika_Campus (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183233192 commented 2026-05-28 01:46:11 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183233117 (Comments: 1) | Paprika_Campus (Discussed changesets: 2) | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. You removed the ro... commented 2026-05-28 01:45:14 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183232696 (Comments: 1) | Evan Slosser (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: it is smart not lo leave any personal information. Unfortunately without deleting the edit, it is going to be there forever. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183232696 ... commented 2026-05-28 01:35:52 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183271818 (Comments: 1) | brianstrauch (Discussed changesets: 5) | #TIP: you removed a stand alone address node. It's good to leave address nodes so when a new business moves in it save the time to add the address. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chan... commented 2026-05-28 01:34:02 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 169101557 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 414) | Yup, as you surmised the location of the node was already incorrect and then they inexplicably changed the details for this Fort Collins, CO location to those of the Amarillo, TX location. I reverted this, moved the point to the correct location per ... commented 2026-05-28 00:47:30 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 169093153 (Comments: 1) | Two Men and a Truck Moving in Amarillo TX (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted POI address and details being changed to those of a different brand location in a complete other state, moved point to correct location per address and fixed other tags in changeset 183280371, and merged the relevant tags with the actual int... commented 2026-05-28 00:44:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183279106 (Comments: 3) | LordGarySugar (Discussed changesets: 33) | "A borderline case may be where a railway was dismantled and replaced with a road of the same geometry." This isnt even close to the current status of the ROW. Get a job man stop wasting your life editing all day for ur own sake. commented 2026-05-28 00:08:47 UTC by idkwhatname2use ♦15 |
| 183274605 (Comments: 2) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | Sure! commented 2026-05-27 23:59:08 UTC by idkwhatname2use ♦15 |
| 183263752 (Comments: 1) | mitchspicer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, in this changeset you have created overlapping ways that cause routing issues. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183279436 commented 2026-05-27 23:48:17 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 183273936 (Comments: 1) | mitchspicer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. As seen on OSM wiki, roads that lead to a bus depot should be tagged highway=service + access=no + bu... commented 2026-05-27 23:45:36 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 182940136 (Comments: 1) | mitchspicer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183279202 commented 2026-05-27 23:40:56 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 183273492 (Comments: 1) | mitchspicer (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, I see you are a new editor to OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately, I've had to revert this changeset as it is inconsistent with OSM guidelines. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183279202 commented 2026-05-27 23:40:56 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 182365012 (Comments: 1) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | As this railway no longer exists, it should not be mapped in OSM. OHM is the best place for historic railways. commented 2026-05-27 23:22:35 UTC by LordGarySugar ♦268 |
| 183219415 (Comments: 2) | LAX_maps (Discussed changesets: 1) | you should probably watch every YouTube video about the keywords ""CAHSR is bad" (plus there is even the possibility that the whole rail line won't even exist because the train is going too fast at 220 mph) commented 2026-05-27 23:20:49 UTC by LAX_maps ♦1 |
| 169104056 (Comments: 1) | Futurism Technologies (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed dragged node and abbreviated addr:street=* and added more specific top-level tags in changeset 183278700 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278700 commented 2026-05-27 23:11:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183277947 (Comments: 1) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 43) | The entire road has a shoulder, but it varies from 7' to less than 1'. In the absence of any guidance on the OSM wiki, I chose 4' as threshold for cycleway=shoulder. Per WSDOT, this is the minimum width of a shoulder that "facilit... commented 2026-05-27 22:42:23 UTC by pesticides ♦51 |
| 169574650 (Comments: 1) | Glassman (Discussed changesets: 80) | Thanks! I in changeset 183278028 removed the SEO spam description=* that was evidently accidentally left after this cleanup. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278028 commented 2026-05-27 22:41:38 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 169472515 (Comments: 4) | Landmark Roofing and Siding (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam description=* (that was evidently accidentally left after the previous cleanup) in changeset 183278028 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183278028 commented 2026-05-27 22:39:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183274079 (Comments: 1) | idkwhatname2use (Discussed changesets: 84) | Zero remanence of the track left. This will be reverted. I recommend you use https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ commented 2026-05-27 22:23:57 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
| 107998761 (Comments: 1) | juhygf (Discussed changesets: 1) | it is 370m, where did you see 120? commented 2026-05-27 22:00:18 UTC by pasciakd ♦1 |
| 183274017 (Comments: 1) | Callen Lynch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please remember to add detailed changeset comments that help other mappers know what you added! commented 2026-05-27 21:56:45 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦28 |
| 183230355 (Comments: 1) | Lorae (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Lorae, Thanks for helping add farmland and other landuse! A few tips for moving forward: Try not to attach landuse areas to non-landuse features like roads or boundaries. This makes it harder to edit the landuse in the future, becaus... commented 2026-05-27 21:51:01 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦28 |
| 183266154 (Comments: 3) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Very good, 'tracktype' is the most common but also quite coarse tag. If you want to add further details you might want to look into 'surface' and 'smoothness'. commented 2026-05-27 19:46:11 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 181329406 (Comments: 2) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 90) | Looks like it was part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180969802 and the other components of that "ecoregion" were deleted. This lingering way should have also be deleted, but was probably missed because they were only looking fo... commented 2026-05-27 19:28:29 UTC by b-jazz ♦873 |
| 183232720 (Comments: 2) | alexwohlbruck (Discussed changesets: 13) | These came from the county dataset, I'll filter these out commented 2026-05-27 18:56:11 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦21 |
| 183090296 (Comments: 1) | Hogmite (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check the spelling of keys: they should be in lower case without capital letters. E.g. 'position' instead of "Position" commented 2026-05-27 18:26:34 UTC by mueschel ♦7,146 |
| 183251746 (Comments: 2) | Drthunder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Afternoon - There is no road name...it's not even a road anymore.. I only put decommissioned to ensure someone had context that this was once a driveway for a building, but that building no longer exists. commented 2026-05-27 18:20:24 UTC by Drthunder ♦1 |
| 183220114 (Comments: 3) | bhietsch (Discussed changesets: 24) | Yeah, I tried to capture as many of the alternates as possible but feel free to add more to alt_name as you see fit! commented 2026-05-27 18:17:25 UTC by bhietsch ♦69 |
| 182354817 (Comments: 3) | VLD317 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi HLD317. This discussion was scattered across a number of interactions between individual mappers, however I was recommended to forward you to this thread on the OSMUS Slack team (https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C6E4S4CQG/p1777661542940159?... commented 2026-05-27 17:42:13 UTC by NE_SwampYankee ♦3 |
| 183092361 (Comments: 1) | AnthonyG3124 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hey, why did you add a "Future I-11" designation to this portion of US 95? There aren't any signs alongside this portion of US 95 that indicate that this portion of US 95 is part of Future I-11. commented 2026-05-27 17:33:36 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦248 |
| 183139641 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 14) | Partially Revert of 183094923 commented 2026-05-27 16:30:18 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 153873849 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 78) | what does the tag "fixme:atp" signify? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153873849 commented 2026-05-27 10:23:40 UTC by Kovirii ♦51 |
| 183129812 (Comments: 1) | calyptcs (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in changeset id:183247323 commented 2026-05-27 10:02:29 UTC by MappingMore ♦453 |
| 181458347 (Comments: 3) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 30) | Thank You commented 2026-05-27 05:32:57 UTC by Natfoot ♦119 |
| 169654451 (Comments: 1) | A Ma Maniére (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam tags, fixed address and opening hours and added/corrected other tags for POI in changeset 183235506 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183235506 commented 2026-05-27 03:12:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 173329343 (Comments: 1) | Nevada Registered Agent LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | (2/2) Revert added SEO spam POI missing top-level tags, an incorrect name and other other SEO spam and invalid tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183234982 commented 2026-05-27 02:37:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 173329570 (Comments: 1) | Nevada Registered Agent LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Revert added SEO spam POI with incorrect top-level tags, a blatantly promotional description and many other SEO spam and invalid tag values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183234958 commented 2026-05-27 02:35:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 183176912 (Comments: 1) | jstnbl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Couple of questions, is the road posted no trespassing? If it isn't it would be more appropriate to tag it as ownership=private. Otherwise someone will likely remove the access tag. Also, the county shows it as Northeast Flicker Hill Lan... commented 2026-05-27 02:10:26 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 182851003 (Comments: 2) | mamanakis (Discussed changesets: 20) | It's one of my goto elements for connecting sidewalks that don't have any natural crossings to make them more rout-able for foot traffic. commented 2026-05-27 00:14:24 UTC by mamanakis ♦9 |
| 183232290 (Comments: 2) | Edward35 (Discussed changesets: 9) | https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?location=42.376171%2C-71.029431%2C17 commented 2026-05-26 23:31:04 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 183210069 (Comments: 1) | Edward35 (Discussed changesets: 9) | This is not a secondary road per https://gis.data.mass.gov/datasets/massgis::massgis-massdot-roads/explore?filters=eyJDTEFTUyI6WzEsNl0sIkZfQ0xBU1MiOlszLDNdfQ%3D%3D&location=42.377309%2C-71.028930%2C17 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changese... commented 2026-05-26 23:25:27 UTC by cubbe8 ♦93 |
| 182672497 (Comments: 1) | Ctown1875 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Looking at your changes here, it looks partially good but there are also a few issues. The name tag is reserved for the actual name of the feature. Mapping notes and so on should go in note= or description=. Also, it... commented 2026-05-26 23:10:36 UTC by Xvtn ♦492 |
| 183181076 (Comments: 2) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! As far as I can tell, this is not actually a hospital, so I replaced this with a more accurate POI. commented 2026-05-26 22:56:54 UTC by wcedmisten ♦10 |
| 183181131 (Comments: 2) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 7) | Nice find! Mapped as a doctor's office in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183231587 commented 2026-05-26 22:51:18 UTC by wcedmisten ♦10 |
| 182310778 (Comments: 4) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 13) | Okay I see what you are talking about. In those cases, the existing data on OSM was significantly off from what was visible in the Strava Heatmap. I started fixing those trails from one end, but only got so far in one sitting and didn't finish, ... commented 2026-05-26 22:02:58 UTC by matthewfecica ♦10 |
| 183039883 (Comments: 3) | SherbetS (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks for fixing James! I have written an email to find out which Bitcoin payment types are accepted. To be continued. Edwin BTC Map commented 2026-05-26 21:50:14 UTC by Comino ♦349 |
| 170768623 (Comments: 1) | billbonelawgroup (Discussed changesets: 1) | Three duplicate SEO-added POIs with SEO spam tags cleaned up and consolidated in changeset 183181851 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181851 commented 2026-05-26 21:38:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 177953950 (Comments: 1) | NV333 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks! I must have accidentally edited this parking lot while extending SR 157 east by a few hundred feet/meters. commented 2026-05-26 21:26:56 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦248 |
| 183117551 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 182) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183228831#map=19/38.939755/-76.924723. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-05-26 21:00:08 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦147 |
| 183042774 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 182) | The tagged area has since been shortened in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183228715#map=18/40.712070/-74.362021. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-05-26 20:57:13 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦147 |
| 182452180 (Comments: 2) | blue389 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed in changeset 183226750. commented 2026-05-26 19:50:38 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦622 |
| 183224516 (Comments: 1) | Cyberbeast26 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Edit done in error. Street in question was unnamed on map and has been corrected (Will Cherry Road) commented 2026-05-26 19:15:00 UTC by Cyberbeast26 ♦1 |
| 183206781 (Comments: 2) | melcomsx (Discussed changesets: 16) | I try to improve commented 2026-05-26 18:12:38 UTC by melcomsx ♦15 |
| 181434106 (Comments: 1) | Rimrocker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reviewing your edits and it looks good. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181434106 commented 2026-05-26 17:18:34 UTC by Natfoot ♦119 |
| 67437463 (Comments: 3) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 46) | Sorry for not responding. Yes. One must use Ctrl+Shift+{ and Ctrl+Shift+} shortcuts in iD jumping directly to the first or last node along the way. List of members of the main boundary relation can also be used to jump to pieces of the border. The co... commented 2026-05-26 17:09:57 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦34 |
| 67306727 (Comments: 3) | ervinjoshuadelrosario (Discussed changesets: 46) | Sorry for not responding. Relation name already changed from United States Mainland to Contiguous United States, with United States Mainland placed as an alternative name. Thank you. commented 2026-05-26 17:04:35 UTC by ervinjoshuadelrosario ♦34 |
| 182139255 (Comments: 3) | bobthebuilder423468 (Discussed changesets: 27) | barrier=yes or barrier=bollard or barrier=wall specify material and height if desired. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182139255 commented 2026-05-26 16:50:18 UTC by Natfoot ♦119 |
| 181745814 (Comments: 2) | cgreggescalante (Discussed changesets: 2) | That's definitely correct, thanks for the note. I'm starting work on correcting my previous edits --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181745814 commented 2026-05-26 16:17:37 UTC by cgreggescalante ♦2 |
| 183043587 (Comments: 2) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | There is an over lapping line in this change set. https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?note=5305252 both Ian Ave and East Stanford Avenue are overlapping. we also don't abbreviate Ave. we write it out as Avenue as a standard. commented 2026-05-26 16:16:13 UTC by Natfoot ♦119 |
| 183182364 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 214) | In the event this change were to be reverted, I think Georgetown stands even more as a city now with its population surpassing 100k and its insanely rapid growth since the 2020 census. commented 2026-05-26 16:12:37 UTC by Joseph R P ♦432 |
| 183211690 (Comments: 1) | schobbish (Discussed changesets: 8) | Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183212510 commented 2026-05-26 14:39:57 UTC by schobbish ♦56 |
| 183084683 (Comments: 1) | Aiden Kelly (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey Aiden, It's usually better update a node with shop=vacant or disused:amenity=restaurant than to delete the nodes. This helps preserve the history: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history commented 2026-05-26 13:58:46 UTC by ion_chi ♦73 |
| 170151305 (Comments: 2) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 414) | I’m changing all images under the “image” tag to “logo” if they don’t show the actual object. Admittedly, I’m not taking the legal situation into account here, since even a link to the WordPress media library... commented 2026-05-26 09:03:36 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,573 |
| 170153344 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed blatently SEO spam description and other SEO spam tags in changeset/183193308 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183193308 commented 2026-05-26 08:22:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 146539079 (Comments: 1) | Pinnacle Periodontics and Dental Implants (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed blatently SEO spam description and other SEO spam tags in changeset 183193308 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183193308 commented 2026-05-26 08:19:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 170148617 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removed SEO spam description as well as image=*/logo=* in changeset 183192452 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183192452 commented 2026-05-26 07:58:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183182589 (Comments: 3) | Lonen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello there, I think there's no need for intervention here by the DWG because it seems that user Lonen is already clear about this, just stating it for the sake of completeness: There is almost nothing that is "not permitted to be mapped&qu... commented 2026-05-26 07:29:58 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,651 |
| 183179777 (Comments: 1) | Hotshotitaliano (Discussed changesets: 1) | When adding it directly to the map, please also don't submit a note.... commented 2026-05-26 05:12:40 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,096 |
| 183068782 (Comments: 1) | StreetSurveyor (Discussed changesets: 92) | btw, it looks like cubbe8 reverted this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183071407#map=13/42.35448/-71.07948 commented 2026-05-26 03:57:43 UTC by synthfi ♦20 |
| 182131542 (Comments: 1) | Udarian (Discussed changesets: 107) | Thanks for fixing the other issues. Seems the SEO spam description was missed here; removed in changeset 183183544 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183544 commented 2026-05-26 02:40:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 182102939 (Comments: 1) | Parrish Bail Bonds (Discussed changesets: 1) | Many problems fixed in changeset 182131542 ; I then removed the SEO spam description=* in changeset 183183544 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182131542 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183544 commented 2026-05-26 02:38:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181135227 (Comments: 1) | Spendable (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed SEO spam POI with no meaningful tags, reverted name change of entire building to one POI within, and fixed bad address tagging in changset 183183242 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183242 commented 2026-05-26 02:17:01 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183126869 (Comments: 2) | JesseFTW (Discussed changesets: 17) | Yes, good idea. Please do so! commented 2026-05-26 02:14:03 UTC by JesseFTW ♦155 |
| 181258184 (Comments: 1) | Levels AI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted SEO addition of name=* to building with no other meaningful tags https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183183145 commented 2026-05-26 02:09:12 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 181442468 (Comments: 1) | Bill Bone Bike Law (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted the SEO spam road name change, removed POI name from entire building and merged three SEO-added POIs for Bill Bone law into one in changeset 183181851 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181851 commented 2026-05-26 00:52:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181454859 (Comments: 1) | Sundays Sun Spa Wellness (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted addition of non-existent/promotional beauty=* subtags, and also fixed website=* to point to this specific location in changeset 183181642 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181642 commented 2026-05-26 00:40:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181454600 (Comments: 1) | Sundays Sun Spa Wellness (Discussed changesets: 4) | In changeset 183181571 I reverted this incorrect change of a location-specific website=* URL to the general homepage, and fix the malformed opening_hours=* added here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181571 commented 2026-05-26 00:37:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181453383 (Comments: 1) | Sundays Sun Spa Wellness (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted the inexplicable SEO spam change of a strip mall suite from building=retail to building=service in changset 183181482 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181482 commented 2026-05-26 00:30:50 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 181453006 (Comments: 1) | Sundays Sun Spa Wellness (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted SEO spam: Tags for one POI were incorrectly added to an entire strip mall building, and most tags added/changed on the POI had incorrect/malformed values https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183181429 commented 2026-05-26 00:25:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 183089094 (Comments: 2) | maddog107 (Discussed changesets: 15) | Ok yes, I fixed all the stuff. Thanks for telling me! commented 2026-05-25 23:18:34 UTC by maddog107 ♦14 |
| 181959183 (Comments: 2) | Ave Arboris (Discussed changesets: 1) | I believe Tulsa's currently not installing anything less than 6 feet wide, and most everything south of the tracks is likely at least 7... I'd recommend actually measuring. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA ... commented 2026-05-25 22:33:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,421 |
| 177667774 (Comments: 1) | BallbusterFtheGOV (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks for the add. commented 2026-05-25 22:04:44 UTC by skorasaurus ♦221 |
| 183128763 (Comments: 1) | DSanchez777 (Discussed changesets: 6) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1521074656, et al When drawing golf course areas (i.e. greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways (lines) used to outline those areas must not cross over each other. Fairway outl... commented 2026-05-25 21:58:13 UTC by b-jazz ♦873 |
| 183135000 (Comments: 1) | Noelia<3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I visited this park in March 2026 and realized that the OSM routes were so different than the actual park map that I had to come back and fix it. My GPS track appears to match the official park map, which I consulted along the way: https://parks.alam... commented 2026-05-25 20:08:01 UTC by Noelia<3 ♦1 |
| 183129347 (Comments: 1) | Pinecorn (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: please leave a changeset comment, it will help you and others. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more info. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changeset... commented 2026-05-25 18:50:13 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183129683 (Comments: 1) | calyptcs (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: please leave good changeset comments. I will help you and others. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more informations --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... commented 2026-05-25 18:48:49 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183117608 (Comments: 1) | dhcmrlchtdj (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: we spell out street names in OSM because softare has a hard time unabbreviating --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183117608 commented 2026-05-25 18:44:32 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183080695 (Comments: 1) | Advanced Pest Management Services Inc - Residential & Commercial Exterminators (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam fully reverted. commented 2026-05-25 17:16:03 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,537 |
| 183079340 (Comments: 1) | Advanced Pest Management Services Inc - Residential & Commercial Exterminators (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam fully reverted. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183079340 commented 2026-05-25 17:15:29 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,537 |
| 183164168 (Comments: 1) | Robert Lazu (Discussed changesets: 10) | None of those appear to be a tertiary road, most of them appear to be driveways and then residential roads. I'd like to recommend you learn more about road classifications before you continue editing. I've been following your edits and almo... commented 2026-05-25 16:36:12 UTC by CoryS89 ♦12 |
| 183166530 (Comments: 1) | EP_Repair (Discussed changesets: 24) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 178008082, 178008636, 178048810, 178102167, 179275692, 179304824, 179305488, 179317327, 179317427, 179400451, 179404764, 180306953, 180645564, 180646868, 180676408, 180732227, 180733807, 180... commented 2026-05-25 16:20:44 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 182206099 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:43 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179317327 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:43 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179275692 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:43 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179305488 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:42 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179400451 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:42 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 178048810 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:41 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180646868 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:41 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180733807 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:40 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 178102167 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:40 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 182206429 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:39 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179304824 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:39 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 178008082 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:38 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 178008636 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:38 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179404764 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:37 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180645564 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:37 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 182220084 (Comments: 2) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:36 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180733887 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:36 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180306953 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:35 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 179317427 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:35 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180732227 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:34 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 180676408 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:34 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 181992571 (Comments: 1) | kris507 (Discussed changesets: 4) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 183166530 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets adding vegetation traced from water and boundary ways, causing disruption to both features. User block issued. commented 2026-05-25 16:20:33 UTC by EP_Repair ♦586 |
| 163210843 (Comments: 2) | rsavoye (Discussed changesets: 63) | That's a very unusual way to find an area to do some mapping in! My last changeset just reverted my drag mistake, but otherwise the geometries were the same as what was already there. All I was doing was adding name and/or ref where they were la... commented 2026-05-25 15:22:59 UTC by rsavoye ♦48 |
| 183131775 (Comments: 1) | infaog (Discussed changesets: 1) | We don't delete roads just because they're private, we put access=private on them instead. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183131775 ... commented 2026-05-25 13:52:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,421 |
| 183132232 (Comments: 2) | DunDan8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Kk, I'll try to cross reference more with NAD and Bing Streetside commented 2026-05-25 13:00:49 UTC by DunDan8 ♦1 |
| 182710112 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 45) | Removed the tag east of South Webster Ave in changeset/183152683 commented 2026-05-25 11:39:58 UTC by JakovRajić ♦37 |
| 183143244 (Comments: 3) | PlausibleParaphenalia (Discussed changesets: 3) | The trees issue is also a problem with the detached garage of the home that was missing, as you can only see part of it on Bing Maps Aerial. commented 2026-05-25 08:40:24 UTC by PlausibleParaphenalia ♦3 |
| 183140180 (Comments: 1) | PlausibleParaphenalia (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm not entirely sure whether the road that goes underneath the building should be considered a "tunnel" or not, since it's just going underneath the roof of the gas station. I don't really know, since I am new to this... commented 2026-05-25 07:28:39 UTC by PlausibleParaphenalia ♦3 |
| 183124467 (Comments: 1) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source is survey not imagery commented 2026-05-25 02:13:12 UTC by jm428 ♦50 |
| 183133302 (Comments: 1) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source is survey not imagery commented 2026-05-25 02:13:00 UTC by jm428 ♦50 |
| 183133318 (Comments: 1) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source is survey not imagery commented 2026-05-25 02:12:48 UTC by jm428 ♦50 |
| 183133333 (Comments: 1) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source is survey not imagery commented 2026-05-25 02:12:28 UTC by jm428 ♦50 |
| 182937352 (Comments: 1) | Nate U (Discussed changesets: 1) | While this is a sweet gesture, it actually goes against OSM's 'On the Ground Rule' and the 'Don't invent names' good practice guidelines on the OSM Wiki. Features can only be given names that actually exist in real life,... commented 2026-05-25 01:57:58 UTC by Cheeser ♦1 |
| 171384719 (Comments: 1) | Outdoor Warehouse Supply Plano (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed blatantly promotional SEO spam description and logo tags in changeset 183130361 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130361 commented 2026-05-24 23:17:29 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 171611008 (Comments: 2) | Coastal Marine Charters (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed remaining SEO spam tags in changeset 183130280 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130280 commented 2026-05-24 23:13:20 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 171811379 (Comments: 4) | Saint Raphael Roofing (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted due to being a SEO spam POI apparently added at the wrong location https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183130207 commented 2026-05-24 23:09:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Revert ♦90 |
| 172989135 (Comments: 3) | TN Computer Medics (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed remaining SEO spam tags in changeset 183129988 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129988 commented 2026-05-24 22:55:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172589184 (Comments: 4) | Apple Roofing Urbandale (Discussed changesets: 1) | NB Pascal, in case you see this, you might want to strip logo=* and image=* in these cases as well as they are commonly added by these SEO spam accounts, and typically link to non-free, copyrighted and trademarked images hosted on external sites (and... commented 2026-05-24 22:48:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172730343 (Comments: 3) | Apple Roofing Lakewood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Stripped additional SEO spam tags in changeset 183129751 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129751 commented 2026-05-24 22:43:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 175778369 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing - Plymouth (Discussed changesets: 2) | Stripped SEO spam tags, and fixed incorrect opening hours and address tags in changeset 183129696 https://osm.org/changeset/183129696 commented 2026-05-24 22:41:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 170331275 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing Blue Springs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Stripped SEO spam description and tags, and fixed incorrect address tags in changeset 183129644 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129644 commented 2026-05-24 22:37:52 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 170333125 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing Blue Springs (Discussed changesets: 3) | Stripped SEO spam description and tags, and fixed incorrect address tags in changeset 183129644 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129644 commented 2026-05-24 22:37:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172526042 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing in St Peters (Discussed changesets: 1) | Incorrectly abbreviated street name and city fixed in changeset 183129515 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129515 commented 2026-05-24 22:32:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 170414009 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing Plano (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam removed in changeset 170421265 and changeset 183129395 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170421265 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129395 commented 2026-05-24 22:29:15 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 174554916 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing in Springfield (Discussed changesets: 1) | Fixed wrongly-abbreviated street name (that was already fixed for you before) in changeset 183129352 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183129352 commented 2026-05-24 22:25:06 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 172252626 (Comments: 1) | Apple Roofing Lincoln (Discussed changesets: 1) | You attempted to change the address of an existing building, which in fact did not move to a totally different location but rather it was merely the business inside that did (the actual location of which was not actually moved at all to match). There... commented 2026-05-24 22:22:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183123490 (Comments: 3) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Cheers! commented 2026-05-24 21:26:57 UTC by Mxdanger ♦99 |
| 183123323 (Comments: 1) | Casteo (Discussed changesets: 5) | Casteo, please create smaller changesets and give a proper description of what you changed for which reason. Road is under construction, when you change a road to highway- construction. Do not span your edits that large and just call the chang... commented 2026-05-24 21:02:15 UTC by aighes ♦44 |
| 182961912 (Comments: 1) | vrkrebs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! commented 2026-05-24 20:32:28 UTC by stevea ♦318 |
| 183044721 (Comments: 1) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | #TIP: just add the address to the building outline unless the building has multiple addresses. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183044721 commented 2026-05-24 20:21:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183042188 (Comments: 3) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183042188 commented 2026-05-24 20:19:44 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183041887 (Comments: 1) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | when adding a driveway, it needs to be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Can you fix this? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183041887 commented 2026-05-24 20:18:49 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183041279 (Comments: 1) | mushymapper (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183041279 commented 2026-05-24 20:17:12 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183037215 (Comments: 1) | idalis_laboy (Discussed changesets: 2) | When adding a gate to a private road, it makes sense to tag the section of the road as private to inform routers --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183037215 commented 2026-05-24 20:15:11 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183036900 (Comments: 1) | idalis_laboy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183036900 commented 2026-05-24 20:13:47 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 183035593 (Comments: 1) | AwestG (Discussed changesets: 1) | It looks like you acidentially dragged a node when updating the polygon. It has been fixed. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183035593 commented 2026-05-24 20:11:23 UTC by Glassman ♦5,943 |
| 182622528 (Comments: 3) | zunaKejas (Discussed changesets: 2) | Okay, thanks for the information! I also did not know about the FastDraw plugin. Perhaps I'll give it a try. As for the portions around the Vegas metro area that need the most attention (IMO), I think the westernmost section needs the mos... commented 2026-05-24 19:38:21 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦248 |
| 183116521 (Comments: 1) | MapmakerrrJohn (Discussed changesets: 7) | Please dont revert this changeset commented 2026-05-24 18:26:36 UTC by MapmakerrrJohn ♦5 |
| 183075783 (Comments: 5) | Brad McConnell (Discussed changesets: 4) | (Oops, made a mistake of my own and accidentally submitted before I was quite finished editing my comment--meant to say at the beginning "might want to consider doing some research or consulting the community before conducting a far-reaching pro... commented 2026-05-24 17:42:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦227 |
| 183026190 (Comments: 2) | Taya_S (Discussed changesets: 97) | Hello sus242424, Please look at the shape of the residential landuse I removed. It was basically just a city sized blob that had no regards for what is actually on the ground or what has already been mapped. Right on top of motorways; on top o... commented 2026-05-24 15:35:56 UTC by Taya_S ♦2,660 |
| 34294943 (Comments: 2) | OceanVortex (Discussed changesets: 10) | I made that edit almost 11 years ago. I believe the building is now occupied by an auto body shop, so the power_ question is now moot. commented 2026-05-24 15:02:25 UTC by OceanVortex ♦19 |
| 170995276 (Comments: 1) | AlexTriloba (Discussed changesets: 5) | grade1 for unpaved? commented 2026-05-24 13:05:35 UTC by andrewsuzuki ♦101 |
| 182349395 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 182) | The wrongly tagged segment has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183106502. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-05-24 12:51:56 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦147 |
| 182344745 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 182) | The wrongly tagged segment has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183106308#map=16/32.48720/-93.75054. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-05-24 12:48:11 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦147 |
| 76475823 (Comments: 1) | AdamTheWebMan (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245883124/history has shop = power_equipment that was added in this edit shop=power_equipment ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is shop=power_equipment used intentionally instead of https://wiki.openstre... commented 2026-05-24 08:14:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,901 |
| 183093207 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Kvalheim (Discussed changesets: 8) | JOSM bugged out; actual description and tags are in changeset 183093226. commented 2026-05-24 06:54:45 UTC by Andrew Kvalheim ♦25 |
| 183090149 (Comments: 1) | alexwohlbruck (Discussed changesets: 13) | I got rate limited mid upload and now can't revert these changes. I will try tomorrow, but if anyone would like to revert sooner feel free commented 2026-05-24 03:35:36 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦21 |
| 183089749 (Comments: 2) | schobbish (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thank you QuiLe………. commented 2026-05-24 03:29:23 UTC by schobbish ♦56 |
| 183088858 (Comments: 1) | Brad McConnell (Discussed changesets: 4) | it is good that the brand and brand:wikidata have been added but the addresses are still incorrectly formatted, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#United_States Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-05-24 02:37:21 UTC by Udarian ♦753 |
| 183088043 (Comments: 2) | nobodi3390 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Portable speed detector with a pair of cameras pointed towards both sides of the road. Placed in the diagonal yellow stripes zone (no crossing). commented 2026-05-24 02:00:13 UTC by nobodi3390 ♦2 |
| 182098869 (Comments: 1) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 27) | Maple St / Old Maple St is a bit confusing on the ground. I’ve updated the previous edit to reflect MassGIS road data alongside on-the-ground signage. MassGIS shows the corridor primarily as Maple St, but it also supports a short segment near t... commented 2026-05-24 01:47:53 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦161 |