| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 189603107 (Comments: 1) | UncleBoy12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21356 commented 2026-09-26 22:01:33 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,916 |
| 144058342 (Comments: 2) | jleedev (Discussed changesets: 25) | Almost certain that ` is an accident trying to press Tab to move fields. commented 2026-09-26 21:58:26 UTC by jleedev ♦306 |
| 184016299 (Comments: 15) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 15) | Although I am not so much familiar with LP, I just make a general comment from a neutral view. As a user editing the trails very often, I completely agree with the comment by @{kevin open street}. Clicking a relationship and then finding hundreds o... commented 2026-09-26 21:04:15 UTC by cdl02930 ♦2 |
| 189601954 (Comments: 1) | kevinparsonsjr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Kev. Address info should not be on roads, but on buildings. Abbreviations should be expanded, South for S, Road for Road, etc. I've adjusted. commented 2026-09-26 19:58:56 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 189401143 (Comments: 1) | SpeedBlade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Even BMX bikes not allowed? commented 2026-09-26 19:41:00 UTC by mbeyerle ♦53 |
| 188259675 (Comments: 1) | Yipper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yipper, welcome to OSM. I see you deleted the business, building and address node at 6 Coryell Street. Was the building demolished, or just the business gone. The address should still be there. Probably want to use the disued tag, see this item a... commented 2026-09-26 19:32:21 UTC by wireguy ♦587 |
| 188497509 (Comments: 2) | wolfgang8741 (Discussed changesets: 23) | Thanks for catching this, yes it should be sports. I fixed and added the brand tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189599734 commented 2026-09-26 17:53:03 UTC by wolfgang8741 ♦48 |
| 189429353 (Comments: 4) | lbilldt (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yeah, eliminating the "rough-in" would be preferred. It's sets off all sort of Q/A alarms and causes me and others extra work. It's better to just leave your work unsubmitted until you have things polished. Thanks. I don�... commented 2026-09-26 17:22:26 UTC by b-jazz ♦951 |
| 187622133 (Comments: 1) | Causeistheffect (Discussed changesets: 1) | For tracking purposes only but not really for solving other types of crimes commented 2026-09-26 16:12:44 UTC by Causeistheffect ♦1 |
| 189567632 (Comments: 3) | opensourceisbetter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Got it, Thanks for getting back to me. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of a feature being public or private, ... commented 2026-09-26 15:13:15 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 66131356 (Comments: 2) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Yes. I have fixed it. commented 2026-09-26 15:11:47 UTC by maxolasersquad ♦97 |
| 189569084 (Comments: 1) | Brynnan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi -- is there a reason the house number was removed with this update? commented 2026-09-26 11:23:55 UTC by noahheffron ♦30 |
| 174739097 (Comments: 1) | luke_unknown (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1449255592/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 08:05:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 109155864 (Comments: 1) | Andrew_pnnl (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970407449/history has building:levels = 0.5 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some ... commented 2026-09-26 08:05:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188642651 (Comments: 1) | GeoDave5280 (Discussed changesets: 14) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1556666985/history - that barrier is a typo, right? (or was, at least for that specific object - other may remain) commented 2026-09-26 07:25:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 83758209 (Comments: 1) | Krennel (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used surface=san on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51964993/history Have you maybe meant surface=sand ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 07:04:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 181286964 (Comments: 1) | bbmiller (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! You used surface=unpave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15902897/history Have you maybe meant surface=unpaved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2026-09-26 06:56:28 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 153752807 (Comments: 1) | AnnDee4444 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! You used surface=pave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1257945432/history Have you maybe meant surface=paved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objec... commented 2026-09-26 06:53:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 154719402 (Comments: 1) | 23rfsd25v1c81 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1284735554/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-26 06:48:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189560777 (Comments: 1) | KayViv (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI: holes (the centerline) shouldn't be drawn with so many nodes. See the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole for more info. commented 2026-09-26 06:48:01 UTC by b-jazz ♦951 |
| 189568564 (Comments: 1) | BMJ007 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Dairy farm commented 2026-09-26 06:12:51 UTC by BMJ007 ♦1 |
| 189571392 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | *Put the Water Street District node AT the main crossroads commented 2026-09-26 05:44:50 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 189488487 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 4) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-26 04:19:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189509599 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 17) | This was already tagged as service=driveway. Driveways can have names, too - maybe that's not the case here, but your changeset comment should reflect the change that you are actually making, and ideally why, if it's not immediately apparen... commented 2026-09-26 04:18:59 UTC by citrula ♦1,017 |
| 189487219 (Comments: 1) | Mint Hill Orthodontics (Discussed changesets: 4) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-26 04:17:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189195191 (Comments: 1) | AndreaSchmidtCo (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-09-26 04:15:00 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189569709 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | Source: https://gis.dot.nv.gov/trina/ (OSM-Revert does not allow you to specify a source when reverting, so I have to provide it in a comment instead.) commented 2026-09-26 03:54:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 189427387 (Comments: 2) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 55) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date commented 2026-09-26 03:12:46 UTC by Frank Peng ♦230 |
| 189568531 (Comments: 1) | Collinrenk23! (Discussed changesets: 1) | The crossing of first christian church and the parking lot aisle is a covered entrance to the building commented 2026-09-26 02:26:28 UTC by Collinrenk23! ♦1 |
| 61729605 (Comments: 1) | rjc3000 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617506117/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects ... commented 2026-09-26 01:41:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 135078468 (Comments: 1) | graham980 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817861194/history has building:flats = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to expres... commented 2026-09-26 01:36:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189565629 (Comments: 1) | Menchithecat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM. I notice that Island County GIS doesn't show these streets. They have Twin Oaks Lane ending at the 1881 Twin Oaks Lane house. Could these be highway=service with a possible tag of ownership=private and no name tag? |
| 98454261 (Comments: 1) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11979000/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:37 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 98519259 (Comments: 1) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! You used surface=dir on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17604289/history Have you maybe meant surface=dirt ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects w... commented 2026-09-26 00:18:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 183753521 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 143) | Don't know how that happened. Fixed commented 2026-09-26 00:15:20 UTC by Omnific ♦241 |
| 185212538 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 8) | can you explain this edit? commented 2026-09-25 23:37:16 UTC by Natfoot ♦131 |
| 189566107 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | The street addresses and ZIP codes came from OpenWeb. commented 2026-09-25 23:33:33 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 147163728 (Comments: 1) | Oversold (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used advertising=sign3 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11593868185/history Have you maybe meant advertising=sign ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2026-09-25 23:11:59 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189564226 (Comments: 2) | FDOT_Ryan (Discussed changesets: 7) | Happy to help. This area is very confusing to say the least. -Ryan commented 2026-09-25 23:06:39 UTC by FDOT_Ryan ♦7 |
| 189368154 (Comments: 7) | kmenard (Discussed changesets: 4) | seems to have been fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189564226 commented 2026-09-25 22:44:40 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
| 142247894 (Comments: 1) | zfish118 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213692963/history has building:flats = 1A,1B,1C,1D,1E,1F,1G,H that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended t... commented 2026-09-25 22:33:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 173245368 (Comments: 1) | Mike Moresi (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882625262/history has building:flats = 37-42 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended to express addresse... commented 2026-09-25 22:25:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178253345 (Comments: 1) | Relics (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used leaf_cycle=mixed;deciduous on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20188870/history Have you maybe meant leaf_cycle=mixed ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it ... commented 2026-09-25 22:23:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 138204690 (Comments: 2) | rivermont (Discussed changesets: 69) | A typo indeed! It has been fixed. Thanks commented 2026-09-25 22:22:18 UTC by rivermont ♦243 |
| 189420381 (Comments: 1) | rogerscgreg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. What's here now? A vacant storefront, or something new? commented 2026-09-25 22:14:51 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189430445 (Comments: 1) | noone2301 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution! In OpenStreetMap, we expand abbreviations, so we write "Street" instead of "St", "Northeast" instead of "NE", etc. This is because it's easier to automatically abbreviate names... commented 2026-09-25 22:07:56 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 187717409 (Comments: 3) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | Yes, I used the USGS Topographic maps when creating those ways initially. Sometimes you can combine that with aerial imagery - there's often a slight color change at the thalweg (different levels of turbidity where there's deeper water flow... commented 2026-09-25 21:57:45 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦47 |
| 168463562 (Comments: 1) | mycota (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello! You used crossing:island=n on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1366712693/history Have you maybe meant crossing:island=no ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited ... commented 2026-09-25 21:36:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188695342 (Comments: 2) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 14) | That node fixed. I occasionally see "pole" used on busbar structures (placed by others) though they're really not on poles per se. commented 2026-09-25 21:30:00 UTC by Mr Matt K ♦7 |
| 189124341 (Comments: 4) | atticquilt (Discussed changesets: 9) | You too, wow! commented 2026-09-25 20:39:14 UTC by atticquilt ♦13 |
| 155243592 (Comments: 3) | dknelson9876 (Discussed changesets: 14) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178208514 (Comments: 3) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 14) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:38:07 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 178647548 (Comments: 3) | VLD319 (Discussed changesets: 15) | And thanks for your mapping in general! Not only this specific fix. commented 2026-09-25 20:37:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189554668 (Comments: 1) | Mityaboxer (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189562037 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 124) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 189554668, 189555052, 189555071, 189557391, 189557466. commented 2026-09-25 20:31:57 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189557391 (Comments: 1) | MityastrongBoxer (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189555071 (Comments: 1) | Dimakishenko12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189555052 (Comments: 1) | Dimakishenko12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:56 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189557466 (Comments: 1) | MityastrongBoxer (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 189562037 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism commented 2026-09-25 20:31:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,216 |
| 189512121 (Comments: 1) | Skyeward (Discussed changesets: 1) | On the building you tagged as name=Saint Francis Hospital, I don't think this is correct. That's the name of the campus the building is on, but the building itself has multiple names for each tower. --- #REVIE... commented 2026-09-25 19:30:56 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188274385 (Comments: 3) | I W (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thanks for being so receptive! It's refreshing. I should say, I do like the work you're doing to add landuse and natural area on the map. Keep it up. commented 2026-09-25 19:30:00 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦47 |
| 189510778 (Comments: 1) | grphx (Discussed changesets: 2) | camera:type=destroyed would be invalid anyway (just remove the camera). Fixed would mean it doesn't turn. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189510778 |
| 164451499 (Comments: 1) | TJ Clark (Discussed changesets: 2) | ALPR no longer present commented 2026-09-25 19:08:23 UTC by TJ Clark ♦2 |
| 189369301 (Comments: 1) | dolph13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Was this name change made by the local authorities? Is there an official website where I can read about the new name? Thanks! commented 2026-09-25 19:07:33 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189027393 (Comments: 1) | Levanter66 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello Levanter66! Thanks for your edits to OSM! Can you describe why you deleted way/1553318210? It's often best to leave ways with `abandoned:highway` tags, so others don't re-add them. Learn more: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-09-25 18:07:00 UTC by uppermethow ♦4 |
| 189553829 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 4) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:28 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 189551244 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 4) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:21 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 189556320 (Comments: 1) | paxxom (Discussed changesets: 4) | millbrook* commented 2026-09-25 17:44:05 UTC by paxxom ♦3 |
| 188482074 (Comments: 3) | Jack_expl0res (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for the explanation! The best is to split the road into two parallel ones - one marked as ford, the other as bridge. Both can get their appropriate access tags, and the bridge can have a 'width' tag describing how wide it is. ... commented 2026-09-25 17:25:27 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 189136183 (Comments: 2) | stutterdirectly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Must've been by mistake, sorry commented 2026-09-25 17:09:00 UTC by stutterdirectly ♦1 |
| 189171338 (Comments: 1) | GeoSafe-Moshe_Import (Discussed changesets: 1) | These should be refs, not names, and probably also mapped as route relations as network=US:OK:Garvin --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189171338 commented 2026-09-25 17:01:47 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189132823 (Comments: 1) | erica_busright (Discussed changesets: 10) | Looks like it is one-way but the opposite direction it was originally mapped. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189132823 commented 2026-09-25 16:57:54 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188319949 (Comments: 3) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes I see that, good point, go ahead and change it. commented 2026-09-25 16:52:38 UTC by Killian Bath ♦1 |
| 189088005 (Comments: 1) | ArgyleZombie (Discussed changesets: 16) | Pretty sure these are county road numbers, not names. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189088005 commented 2026-09-25 16:48:57 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188676981 (Comments: 1) | skorasaurus (Discussed changesets: 20) | just to note, yes, it's odd that the lots size are inconsistent sizes, but that's what exists. commented 2026-09-25 16:47:30 UTC by skorasaurus ♦225 |
| 153668171 (Comments: 1) | PurpleLuckyCat (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used surface=grave on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608499561/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obje... commented 2026-09-25 16:43:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189065213 (Comments: 1) | visitingangels (Discussed changesets: 5) | Opening hours applies to when the location is physically open, not when the website is. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189065213 commented 2026-09-25 16:37:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188988521 (Comments: 1) | HeadHunter7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This optometrist got added in a drainage ditch equally distant from multiple buildings. Could you position this at the correct spot, please? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmch... commented 2026-09-25 16:32:29 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 47553785 (Comments: 2) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 44) | Well, that’s sat there for almost a decade with no one catching it… Yes, it is gravel. Not driving over graves! commented 2026-09-25 16:31:15 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦106 |
| 188698443 (Comments: 1) | FlockOffTulsa (Discussed changesets: 2) | Unlikely location (blocking sidewalk, please improve). --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188698443 commented 2026-09-25 15:20:51 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188599430 (Comments: 1) | ktr-osm (Discussed changesets: 3) | This building levitates? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188599430 commented 2026-09-25 15:00:34 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 30829045 (Comments: 1) | ihamr (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/343124425/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 157417105 (Comments: 1) | KINGDM76 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1319885443/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 176072931 (Comments: 1) | NK-Mapper (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1459431188/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:44 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 150086034 (Comments: 1) | cmitchell (Discussed changesets: 30) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1273087930/history has building:levels = 1.25 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has som... commented 2026-09-25 14:26:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 188540596 (Comments: 1) | AtlasVoyager (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are these really "anybody can park here" or are these "customer parking only"? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188540596 commented 2026-09-25 14:26:37 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188473534 (Comments: 1) | jeffmartin1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | So if I came to this location at 3 on a holiday Sunday morning, you'd be open for business? If not, then opening_hours=24/7 is not correct. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/... commented 2026-09-25 14:06:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188470872 (Comments: 2) | AaronFTD (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks like the florist tags were also missed. I updated this location. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188470872 commented 2026-09-25 14:05:20 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188429617 (Comments: 1) | crfdude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this someone's private farm access or is everyone legally prohibited from using this? access=no is relatively uncommon compared to access=private. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2026-09-25 14:01:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 188320590 (Comments: 2) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | Curious if you got a chance to see this or not? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188320590 commented 2026-09-25 13:59:55 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 148035279 (Comments: 1) | Guthrie (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1254958389/history has building:flats = 1911, 1912, 1913, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, 1925, 1926, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935, 1936 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected he... commented 2026-09-25 13:48:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189426421 (Comments: 2) | barefootstache (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thanks for fixing that with clarifications. I was hoping Vespucci had a validator, but it seems like it's not the case. commented 2026-09-25 12:46:20 UTC by barefootstache ♦15 |
| 143810341 (Comments: 1) | Ke945 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220816784/history has building:flats = 01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intended t... commented 2026-09-25 12:36:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 136634970 (Comments: 1) | blak-likorish (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312525567/history has building:flats = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 that was added in this edit What this tag means? Integer value is expected here with info how many flats are here If that was intende... commented 2026-09-25 12:30:13 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189474575 (Comments: 1) | Rooster_21 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189541613 commented 2026-09-25 12:17:55 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189501544 (Comments: 1) | Stannorth (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189540212 commented 2026-09-25 11:42:31 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189462496 (Comments: 1) | JDubMTB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189530595 commented 2026-09-25 07:44:03 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189419634 (Comments: 1) | Jaclyn5 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For way 1561443387 "Sunday: Closed, Monday:7am-6pm Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday: 9am-7pm, Friday:7am-6pm, Saturday: 8am-4pm" shou... commented 2026-09-25 05:00:44 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦79 |
| 186214886 (Comments: 2) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 13) | @Mateusz%20Konieczny the value is correct, the crossing is a crossing:markings=lines but with only one line instead of two commented 2026-09-25 03:10:14 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦16 |
| 189520045 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 39) | I removed them because i felt like it was sort of unsafe to have that detail, but im not sure, im sort of new to this. commented 2026-09-25 03:09:34 UTC by Winterfureternal ♦1 |
| 189508823 (Comments: 1) | Warren Wilcock (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Warren, did you realize that you changed the outline of the river to have highway=secondary? Since this is obviously a mistake, I've already taken care of reverting this change. What part of the bridge were you trying to fix? It appears to al... commented 2026-09-25 02:35:49 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦147 |
| 189369523 (Comments: 1) | jackson_gay (Discussed changesets: 2) | what is the source of these edits? these roads look fake commented 2026-09-25 02:35:03 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦16 |
| 172453306 (Comments: 1) | B-Mac A-Tac (Discussed changesets: 7) | Pine Plantation Trail should be removed- it is an unofficial trail, and the USFS would like to limit off-trail navigation due to ordinance, user safety, and ecological impact. commented 2026-09-25 02:32:16 UTC by srkniery ♦3 |
| 189522976 (Comments: 1) | srkniery (Discussed changesets: 2) | Trails plan documentation: https://woodlandswv.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/EAST_Trail-Master-Plan.pdf commented 2026-09-25 02:27:05 UTC by srkniery ♦3 |
| 186328363 (Comments: 1) | alpacaMaps (Discussed changesets: 10) | The mapper attested to this node being properly placed. Restoring node to the map! commented 2026-09-24 23:55:16 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189520537 (Comments: 1) | srkniery (Discussed changesets: 2) | Official USFS Mower Basin Trail Map can be found here: https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/nfs/files/publication/MowerBasinTrailMap_0.pdf Additional information about trails can be found on Mon Forest Towns Partnership Website: https://monforesttown... commented 2026-09-24 23:30:29 UTC by srkniery ♦3 |
| 189517471 (Comments: 1) | TrevMW (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is my first edit on OSM so happy to hear what I should work on! commented 2026-09-24 21:03:18 UTC by TrevMW ♦1 |
| 133274223 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 42) | Shouldn't the area around all the tennis courts be a recreation ground rather than a sport pitch or am I hallucinating commented 2026-09-24 20:21:34 UTC by I-76 ♦86 |
| 187245424 (Comments: 1) | FlockFree (Discussed changesets: 1) | This appears to be a CDOT traffic camera, not an ALPR. commented 2026-09-24 20:20:59 UTC by WhatHappened ♦1 |
| 189468188 (Comments: 6) | slyons17 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ahh that makes sense. Thanks so much! commented 2026-09-24 20:07:46 UTC by slyons17 ♦1 |
| 184777967 (Comments: 3) | Zynko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks so much for reaching out to let me know. I'll review what I can see about restoring the node tonight. Thanks again! commented 2026-09-24 19:38:22 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189143143 (Comments: 2) | VikasChandra_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 3) | it is still there on the 2026 aerial imagery from Miami Dade county, why did you disconnect it? Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-09-24 19:33:31 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
| 189510821 (Comments: 1) | Cavmir (Discussed changesets: 1) | this changeset was almost purely SEO, I have added the correct office=* tag to make it at least useful and removed the SEO language from the description as that is not allowed in OSM, for more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About_OpenSt... commented 2026-09-24 19:24:59 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
| 189511092 (Comments: 1) | slipstream-wa (Discussed changesets: 1) | * Capitol Forest not Taylor Mountain commented 2026-09-24 18:15:14 UTC by slipstream-wa ♦1 |
| 189503691 (Comments: 1) | Pulchritude (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Pulchritude, can you double-check the placement of this ALPR feature? This seems like a strange location for something like that. Perhaps this is more of a temporary construction-related camera? commented 2026-09-24 17:56:56 UTC by Xvtn ♦509 |
| 189504102 (Comments: 1) | PhilLowry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi PhilLowry, can you double check your reclassification of FR 168 from unclassified to path? My general rule of thumb is that singletrack is generally highway=path, while doubletrack or ways wide enough for a 4-wheeled vehicle typically should at le... commented 2026-09-24 17:54:09 UTC by Xvtn ♦509 |
| 733654 (Comments: 2) | alexrudd (Discussed changesets: 1) | It has since been changed to ref=* . A lot of streams in this area seem to have been imported with such tags in the name and there's been people moving some of them (not all) to ref. commented 2026-09-24 16:35:19 UTC by I-76 ♦86 |
| 189496289 (Comments: 1) | rsitoni_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 23) | Sorry to hijack this, but I would really like some input from the lyft team on something that requires newer imagery (both aerial and especially street level) than I currently have access to, as per https://go-ggi.com/northbound-i-95-exit-ramp-to-s-r... commented 2026-09-24 15:39:37 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
| 189458537 (Comments: 1) | Waxahachie GIS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the fix! Happy mapping commented 2026-09-24 14:18:42 UTC by citrula ♦1,017 |
| 189496384 (Comments: 2) | TFrank52 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also I was discussing this with another mapper, and it sounds like what you spotted here might be and LVT tower rather than an ALPR (https://www.lvt.com) commented 2026-09-24 13:37:16 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦41 |
| 185985161 (Comments: 1) | gvwaal (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi there 👋 You created some speed cameras here and in some other changesets (I see 14 around Minneapolis: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2x0D) But I’m not sure highway=speed_camera is quite the right fit for them. My understanding... commented 2026-09-24 13:02:28 UTC by scrambling_panda ♦24 |
| 189473543 (Comments: 1) | mikotiwa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, what is your reasoning for this change? None of these streets have residences along them, and they seem to mostly fit the definition at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified (notably, the tag does *not* mean the roa... commented 2026-09-24 11:43:38 UTC by willkmis ♦231 |
| 183193137 (Comments: 1) | AeonicB (Discussed changesets: 3) | Please check/correct: highway=0 !? (node 13881308468) Thx in advance. commented 2026-09-24 11:23:31 UTC by Ropino ♦429 |
| 123443212 (Comments: 2) | scarapella (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello. Happily this is a gravel quarry not a grave quarry. And for that matter I hope the practice of mining graves (e.g. for Mummy Brown https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummy_brown) is solidly in our collective past. fixed via: https://www.op... commented 2026-09-24 11:11:57 UTC by scarapella ♦65 |
| 189363048 (Comments: 1) | Jason19991112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189488556 commented 2026-09-24 10:08:36 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189359106 (Comments: 1) | Big Bubbles (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189486863 ; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189486689 commented 2026-09-24 09:32:20 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189376010 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 10) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189485523 commented 2026-09-24 09:05:57 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189380764 (Comments: 1) | John Joseph A Gatchalian (Discussed changesets: 61) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189483464 commented 2026-09-24 08:13:39 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189473236 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 08:12:33 UTC by Comino ♦408 |
| 189473148 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 08:07:35 UTC by Comino ♦408 |
| 189473078 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 08:02:52 UTC by Comino ♦408 |
| 189472994 (Comments: 1) | ArancioneMilano (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to BTCmap. By sharing information about Bitcoin friendly businesses, you’re helping to support the Bitcoin community. Your listing's tags were incomplete, so I have filled them in for you. Please ... commented 2026-09-24 07:48:53 UTC by Comino ♦408 |
| 189371123 (Comments: 1) | SLin07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189478272 commented 2026-09-24 07:15:26 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189372316 (Comments: 1) | Rog232 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189464002 commented 2026-09-24 07:12:58 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189350449 (Comments: 1) | Raul Candias (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189480832 commented 2026-09-24 07:01:58 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189479854 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 71) | there was 2 ocean hills for the same neighborhood commented 2026-09-24 06:28:27 UTC by ieguy3 ♦72 |
| 187167929 (Comments: 1) | Danylo Mostovyi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, original creator of the node here. Could I get some clarification regarding the purpose of its deletion? The device was present at the time that I added it to OSM. commented 2026-09-24 05:29:37 UTC by mappislandzuli ♦1 |
| 189458752 (Comments: 1) | MrPuffelFisch (Discussed changesets: 1) | what's the purpose of adding line=no to the boundary ways? commented 2026-09-24 04:26:54 UTC by citrula ♦1,017 |
| 189428778 (Comments: 5) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 47) | Just sent you a JOSM screenshot on Slack commented 2026-09-24 03:04:16 UTC by TheNightRider ♦84 |
| 189461745 (Comments: 1) | Tom Noogen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! For future reference, typically chain stores (Walmart, Safeway, Taco John's, etc.) don't include the city name in the name= field. Thanks! commented 2026-09-24 02:45:52 UTC by SD Mapman ♦99 |
| 189369963 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AJ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! I just had a couple suggestions for you to improve your mapping in the future: * opening_hours=* for Bridges Nepal Cuisine and Midwest Family Outlet did not follow the va... commented 2026-09-24 01:45:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189376276 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AJ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions here! I just had a few suggestions for you to improve your mapping in the future: * description=* and note=*, if used, should be strictly an objective description of the ... commented 2026-09-24 01:44:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189376370 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi AJ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! I just had one suggestion for you to improve your mapping in the future: make sure to strip out any extra tracking junk out of URLs--the website=* for Jimbo Auto Service had a w... commented 2026-09-24 01:41:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 186376040 (Comments: 1) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 14) | Don't use a descriptive name like "Former Rite-Aid" just leave it blank if it is currently vacant. commented 2026-09-24 00:51:11 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,101 |
| 189195360 (Comments: 1) | AndreaSchmidtCo (Discussed changesets: 2) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-24 00:31:59 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189348397 (Comments: 1) | Dslrocks10 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution! I just had a suggestion for you to improve your mapping in the future: Specifically. opening_hours=* did not follow the valid syntax, Ww-Ww HH:MM-HH:MM (e.g. Mo-Fr 09:00-17:... commented 2026-09-24 00:30:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189036451 (Comments: 6) | vngx32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | w128011127 Hard to tell on aerial imagery, but with the latest mapillary images in the area you can zoom in at the southern part of this way and see that it says "Bike Lane" even though on aerial it looks like a regular sidewalk. If you ... commented 2026-09-23 23:56:57 UTC by HolyCrapThatsALongUsername ♦13 |
| 189464252 (Comments: 1) | Matt Gatti (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2026-09-23 23:32:57 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 189459112 (Comments: 1) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Looks really good! I noticed that on https://indoorequal.org/#map=18.6/39.6302304/-77.6693418&level=0 the women's bathroom isn't showing up. I believe this is because it is missing a level=0 tag. commented 2026-09-23 22:05:44 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦17 |
| 176444179 (Comments: 2) | mueschel (Discussed changesets: 1023) | fixed. commented 2026-09-23 18:39:31 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 189409441 (Comments: 3) | unknown246 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Sounds good, thanks! commented 2026-09-23 18:12:13 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦17 |
| 189438486 (Comments: 1) | tarheelcons (Discussed changesets: 1) | moved, sanity check if you like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189459772 commented 2026-09-23 16:54:32 UTC by m86 ♦23 |
| 189452801 (Comments: 2) | Waxahachie GIS (Discussed changesets: 3) | Yes, Waterfront Drive is still named as such. commented 2026-09-23 16:22:06 UTC by Waxahachie GIS ♦1 |
| 180675101 (Comments: 1) | shinylman (Discussed changesets: 5) | I'm not convinced that we should be tagging routes from "suggested bike routes" layer on the city bike map. These are simple roads that are bike-friendly, which we can indicate using bicycle_road=yes. The fact that these routes have no... commented 2026-09-23 16:14:50 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦25 |
| 189455132 (Comments: 1) | timurmr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Follows the guideline: "if entering or exiting the HOV lane(s) is only permitted at certain locations, modeling the HOV lane(s) as separate ways is preferable." (hov=*) commented 2026-09-23 15:54:26 UTC by timurmr ♦2 |
| 189456706 (Comments: 1) | timurmr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Follows the guideline: "if entering or exiting the HOV lane(s) is only permitted at certain locations, modeling the HOV lane(s) as separate ways is preferable." (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hov) Existing example of su... commented 2026-09-23 15:53:27 UTC by timurmr ♦2 |
| 189376682 (Comments: 4) | Teddy5245 (Discussed changesets: 2) | So if Frederick PD has nothing to with Flock cameras within their City limits, who installing them? Is PD allowing “someone” to “spy” on their citizens? The PD should take down the remaining Flocks and other ALPR. They hav... commented 2026-09-23 15:14:17 UTC by Teddy5245 ♦1 |
| 175971535 (Comments: 2) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 20) | Added heights to all ways in the relation. Was likely a quick tweak for 3d render. 1 level is normally ~3m https://beakerboy.github.io/OSMBuilding/?type=relation&id=20068469 commented 2026-09-23 14:40:12 UTC by j0hn33y ♦21 |
| 189422918 (Comments: 1) | Blahblah_blah (Discussed changesets: 2) | Getting these on Panoramax, too, would be very helpful for mapping these accurately. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189422918 commented 2026-09-23 13:47:46 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 187447214 (Comments: 2) | btwhite92 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi there, This was deliberate; the trail is posted with both a 'blue' and 'black' designation, as opposed to other nearby trails in the same network with just a 'blue' or a 'black'. (https://imglink.cc/cdn/U... commented 2026-09-23 13:40:23 UTC by btwhite92 ♦111 |
| 182478728 (Comments: 3) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Alright, don't know how to tag that either. Just stumbled over this while researching how to tag a bath house. I'll leave it to you. commented 2026-09-23 12:53:39 UTC by LingM ♦19 |
| 147950133 (Comments: 2) | 1998alexkane (Discussed changesets: 62) | Never mind. commented 2026-09-23 09:43:53 UTC by MapsByEX ♦2 |
| 161764497 (Comments: 1) | Arefsn89 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1353386570/history has building:levels = 4.9 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some... commented 2026-09-23 08:57:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189358693 (Comments: 1) | Camron Day (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189432206 commented 2026-09-23 07:29:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189370878 (Comments: 1) | AJ_Domelle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189429268 commented 2026-09-23 07:27:21 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189406894 (Comments: 9) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 47) | So all the SfB brands will need to be set up in the NSI. They are coming out of the woodwork, too. I've got a running list. commented 2026-09-23 07:27:09 UTC by TheNightRider ♦84 |
| 189322083 (Comments: 1) | Skyshark95 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189393782 commented 2026-09-23 07:26:31 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189367917 (Comments: 1) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189433664 commented 2026-09-23 07:18:08 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189368243 (Comments: 1) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189433536 commented 2026-09-23 07:14:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189351326 (Comments: 1) | MikeShep (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189433246 commented 2026-09-23 07:04:33 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189351246 (Comments: 1) | MikeShep (Discussed changesets: 2) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189431611 commented 2026-09-23 06:15:24 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189328712 (Comments: 2) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello andrewrunner, On iD Editor, you’d need to scroll down on the left panel and below the “Feature Type” presets and the “Fields” section that has data forms, you’ll see the “Tags” section. The... commented 2026-09-23 05:44:33 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189425337 (Comments: 1) | Spyder_Monkey (Discussed changesets: 5) | noooo why would you make it all multipolygons whyyyy Please use regular areas for landuse, unless there is a cutout of a different landuse within one landuse, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318010105 Using exclusively multipoly... commented 2026-09-23 05:26:40 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦75 |
| 189364622 (Comments: 1) | calvelage (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189429974 commented 2026-09-23 05:16:54 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189334261 (Comments: 1) | Snowshoe Outlet (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you can use the "Q" keyboard shortcut to square all the corners of the building you're drawing. It helps a lot! commented 2026-09-23 03:30:58 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦54 |
| 189408439 (Comments: 1) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Welcome to Washington! You picked the best part of the state commented 2026-09-23 03:27:32 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦54 |
| 189189131 (Comments: 3) | carlosguerrero_lyft (Discussed changesets: 8) | I've created a forum post at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/what-service-value-for-fuel-pump-aisles-at-amenity-fuel/148007/2 commented 2026-09-23 02:49:48 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦147 |
| 188215667 (Comments: 3) | Robtieman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks Rob. I've updated it! commented 2026-09-23 02:01:51 UTC by will l ♦6 |
| 184774819 (Comments: 2) | Moonfire (Discussed changesets: 8) | My pleasure! I enjoyed cleaning up parts of 101 almost as much as I enjoyed driving it! The Avenue of the Giants was especially magical. commented 2026-09-23 00:57:51 UTC by Moonfire ♦8 |
| 68421475 (Comments: 1) | LukeyBear (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Do you have a source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/64039488? It runs entirely on service roads that parallel the Sloan Channel. Thanks! commented 2026-09-23 00:01:42 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 189401769 (Comments: 1) | xanderthemapper31 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, Why was this area set to landuse - grass? It is already marked as residential and has a mix of houses, grass and trees. commented 2026-09-22 23:02:19 UTC by MikeN ♦371 |
| 189275464 (Comments: 1) | Travln1620 (Discussed changesets: 12) | I added back the roads you deleted. Please stop vandalizing the map. OSM maps features that exist on the ground not how you wish things were. Your repeated vandalism of motorized routes in Utah has been noted. Please stop. commented 2026-09-22 21:31:15 UTC by pmckay419 ♦20 |
| 189128640 (Comments: 3) | alojmm (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-22 21:23:14 UTC by will l ♦6 |
| 189371618 (Comments: 1) | ClaireBotanist (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome back to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is ... commented 2026-09-22 21:18:58 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 189417548 (Comments: 1) | ersaz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you have mapped many areas and tagged them with animal=horse_walker that do not look like horse walkers but like round pens, example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1561425682 . Round pens are no horse walkers, see https://wiki.openstreetmap... commented 2026-09-22 21:00:59 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦913 |
| 189406032 (Comments: 3) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 143) | Oh, well that's an easy fix. I must have mislabeled that too, it should be using the post office tag. commented 2026-09-22 20:24:17 UTC by jorbit ♦2 |
| 189412492 (Comments: 1) | eric_1345 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, thanks for adding details here! For the future, it's generally considered preferable to modify existing elements rather than deleting and redrawing them, like you did for the parking aisles and woods here. See https://wiki.openstreetma... commented 2026-09-22 19:19:18 UTC by willkmis ♦231 |
| 189372867 (Comments: 2) | greatnameguys2472 (Discussed changesets: 17) | My bad, reverted commented 2026-09-22 18:51:47 UTC by greatnameguys2472 ♦35 |
| 187355428 (Comments: 2) | billatq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yup, fixed it. commented 2026-09-22 17:21:49 UTC by billatq ♦1 |
| 189362997 (Comments: 3) | Christopher Stouter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay, awesome! Thank you for your work. commented 2026-09-22 16:01:43 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦17 |
| 186733602 (Comments: 2) | maxolasersquad (Discussed changesets: 30) | Yes, it is a typo. commented 2026-09-22 15:08:03 UTC by maxolasersquad ♦97 |
| 58095779 (Comments: 2) | OceanVortex (Discussed changesets: 11) | Just a typo, I guess. I've fixed it. commented 2026-09-22 15:06:03 UTC by OceanVortex ♦20 |
| 189360909 (Comments: 1) | Cares8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please make the shapes match the building footprints. That's the whole reason why OSM hasn't blind-imported Bing's building detections, the shape is important. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Pub... commented 2026-09-22 15:02:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 97331693 (Comments: 1) | JriSv250 (Discussed changesets: 55) | Hello! You used shop=candle;cosmetics on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8313186666/history Have you maybe meant shop=candles;cosmetics ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (... commented 2026-09-22 15:02:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 144436347 (Comments: 1) | countrymouse (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7332028633/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 51693573 (Comments: 1) | MikeN (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077122147/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 3181241 (Comments: 1) | MikeN (Discussed changesets: 21) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/568121368/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-22 14:59:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 6316381 (Comments: 1) | BN1228 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/981662437/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects whe... commented 2026-09-22 14:58:45 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 15369289 (Comments: 1) | 123maps (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! You used shop=tile on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2202651327/history Have you maybe meant shop=tiles ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects wh... commented 2026-09-22 14:58:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 146682553 (Comments: 1) | Jon Hanson (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used parking:right=streetside on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391846966/history Have you maybe meant parking:right=street_side ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace ... commented 2026-09-22 14:49:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189253249 (Comments: 3) | Howpper (Discussed changesets: 207) | You can change it for now if you want. commented 2026-09-22 13:41:49 UTC by Howpper ♦122 |
| 189388826 (Comments: 1) | revent (Discussed changesets: 17) | This version actually comes closest to matching the ground truth (just use the correct separator on ref). The newer version as an area is an unusual way to map runways and goes off into the trees. --- Pu... commented 2026-09-22 13:35:10 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 189392192 (Comments: 1) | revent (Discussed changesets: 17) | It should be noted that references are separated by ; in OSM, even if the FAA doesn't do it that way. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/189392192 commented 2026-09-22 13:32:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,587 |
| 172213883 (Comments: 1) | elwwan (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13158337867/history so is tree or shrub? or have you meant that it is shrub that can/will/could grow into a tree? commented 2026-09-22 13:00:04 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189342414 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-AS (Discussed changesets: 88) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189395230 commented 2026-09-22 11:51:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189322354 (Comments: 1) | Feisty_Wench (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189393284 commented 2026-09-22 11:10:13 UTC by rajdhani ♦503 |
| 189385601 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 7) | source=local knowledge;aerial imagery commented 2026-09-22 08:28:33 UTC by h234a2hm ♦7 |
| 189203054 (Comments: 2) | Sergei Amuzinski (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, Baloo Uriza! Thanks for the feedback. I see your point, but I am not sure it would be appropriate to map this as a culvert. The existing way is an administrative boundary, not a waterway. The OSM Wiki describes tunnel=culvert as being used ... commented 2026-09-22 08:18:24 UTC by Sergei Amuzinski ♦10 |
| 189371508 (Comments: 1) | Melissa Engelsen (Discussed changesets: 10) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189381443 commented 2026-09-22 06:48:59 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189372020 (Comments: 1) | Woazboat (Discussed changesets: 11) | Mmm. Oh. Good pie. Yeah. commented 2026-09-22 06:36:54 UTC by marcmarti ♦106 |
| 189131560 (Comments: 1) | Mules_510 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Thanks for your contributions. I noticed a small thing that I wanted to let you know about. You've added the "lazy river" tag to a few swimming pools that aren't lazy rivers. They're a pretty particular thing. For ... commented 2026-09-22 06:04:45 UTC by watmildon ♦319 |
| 189286197 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189378047 commented 2026-09-22 04:42:12 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 187852520 (Comments: 1) | Christie91277 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I hate to break it to you, but splitting ways like this (ie the single lane mapping) isn't the approved OSM way of mapping and will confuse a lot of GPSes. The rule of thumb is not to split unless there is a physical separation, like a median.<... commented 2026-09-22 04:35:15 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦111 |
| 189294274 (Comments: 1) | FrenchToastFox (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189353098 commented 2026-09-22 04:20:03 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189281541 (Comments: 1) | John Joseph A Gatchalian (Discussed changesets: 61) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189342691 commented 2026-09-22 04:17:45 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189311378 (Comments: 1) | Tommy Pellettiere (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189328391 commented 2026-09-22 04:15:16 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 184554528 (Comments: 1) | Bub$ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Bub$,\r \r This edit appears to be incorrect according to a Lubbock resident and GSV. Please only update nodes that have been physically verified in the world. The node appears to point down Dowden Road by the aforementioned accounts.\r \... commented 2026-09-22 02:47:00 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦410 |
| 189142845 (Comments: 1) | Dookie Doctors Pet Waste Removal (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, this business has been removed in changeset/189374904 as it appears to have come from an SEO company that is adding many businesses incorrectly, always using incorrect tags that then demand cleanup from volunteer mappers. We have tried ... commented 2026-09-22 02:03:11 UTC by Joel Koen ♦87 |
| 189331128 (Comments: 1) | Aaaguards security (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset 189375499. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers. commented 2026-09-22 02:02:59 UTC by schobbish ♦83 |
| 187841092 (Comments: 1) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 11) | RE: way/123461877 & way/397498106 Why did you added foot=no tags to southbound Sepulveda Boulevard north of Imperial Highway? I don't recall seeing signs prohibiting pedestrians from those sections of road when I've walked/moved... commented 2026-09-22 00:17:12 UTC by crushtheserpent ♦28 |
| 189360508 (Comments: 2) | AmoebaWasTaken (Discussed changesets: 2) | Not a hard and fast rule, just wanted to explain my rationale since we're working on similar areas! :) commented 2026-09-22 00:14:26 UTC by cederbs ♦1 |
| 189372702 (Comments: 1) | goyslop (Discussed changesets: 1) | on various aerial imagery (including the 2026 imagery from Miami Dade County) this is positioned in a likely incorrect way, it is in the middle of the kerb which seems incredibly unlikely to me. Please double check its position and fix it using aeria... commented 2026-09-21 23:53:10 UTC by Udarian ♦944 |
| 189366471 (Comments: 1) | kiritimati7 (Discussed changesets: 13) | ** source=survey commented 2026-09-21 23:50:22 UTC by kiritimati7 ♦16 |
| 189352644 (Comments: 2) | zsmith3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted with changeset/189372691 commented 2026-09-21 23:21:18 UTC by Mxdanger ♦116 |
| 189352656 (Comments: 2) | zsmith3 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted with changeset/189372662 commented 2026-09-21 23:19:56 UTC by Mxdanger ♦116 |
| 189215414 (Comments: 1) | tmgessner (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi welcome to OSM. Please dont removed features that exist on the ground, instead just update the feature type to driveway. Thanks! commented 2026-09-21 23:00:25 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 187652799 (Comments: 5) | Sparks (Discussed changesets: 42) | - [/] **MD 4 SB → Suitland Pkwy → Dower House Rd/Marlboro Pike ramp**: check for a stray connection/tag letting routers go straight through the MD4/Suitland Pkwy signal instead of right-turn-then-ramp. Confirm turn:lanes / restriction refle... commented 2026-09-21 22:51:30 UTC by Sparks ♦39 |
| 188599607 (Comments: 7) | w0x0f (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello. I recently went to the area, and both directions of traffic are now open, as proved by my GPX files of the region. commented 2026-09-21 22:24:10 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 188498086 (Comments: 1) | washington_irving (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey there, I agree with the revert. Bollards and paint are not enough to denote a separate bikeway. The road should be tagged with cycleway=lane or cycleway:left=lane + cycleway:right=lane and the separate cycle path removed. See: https://wiki.openst... commented 2026-09-21 22:10:17 UTC by clambake92115 ♦14 |
| 189362777 (Comments: 2) | pkaiser0828 (Discussed changesets: 1) | @pitscheplatsch Yes, I'm new and just might use it to make some personal bike routes. So yeah, testing out the editing features. I don't know- what should I do to test, or watch? commented 2026-09-21 21:52:39 UTC by pkaiser0828 ♦1 |
| 180566042 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | Yes, actually. I had a brief discussion with Joseph R P here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180033654 commented 2026-09-21 21:35:45 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 188889301 (Comments: 2) | 5Nap (Discussed changesets: 3) | fair point... I checked the guidelines for US roads, it should be primary_link, you're right. Don't like this approach, but I'll revert my changes for the sake of consistency commented 2026-09-21 21:24:34 UTC by 5Nap ♦1 |
| 187100153 (Comments: 4) | oscarm_lyft (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi Udar, Thanks a lot for confirming this and for sharing the link to the 2026 Miami-Dade imagery! That custom layer is super helpful to have right in iD. Best regards and happy mapping, Oscar commented 2026-09-21 20:38:33 UTC by oscarm_lyft ♦6 |
| 189201635 (Comments: 1) | HansHansen123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Red Hawk Road continues as Red Hawk Road until it dead ends near the Blanco River. It does not change back to Lone Man Creek Drive. commented 2026-09-21 20:14:17 UTC by Lloyd Provost ♦1 |
| 188319736 (Comments: 1) | Citizen208 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Heads up on this one. There's a principle in OSM called "Names are not functions". You don't want to put a name on a road that doesn't have one, like a parking isle. The other tags make that clear. I've gone ahead and re... commented 2026-09-21 19:18:42 UTC by ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦34 |
| 188317527 (Comments: 1) | Citizen208 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Looks good! Welcome to the mapping community! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188317527 commented 2026-09-21 19:15:15 UTC by ColbyTheWorldTraveler ♦34 |
| 189264432 (Comments: 4) | AmoebaWasTaken (Discussed changesets: 2) | Okay, I just uploaded a revert. Thanks! commented 2026-09-21 19:01:11 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189315980 (Comments: 6) | Daniel Claassen (Discussed changesets: 1) | Even though you requested a review on your changeset, things you edit still go live immediately, so there's nothing for me to decline or restart. The request for review is why I looked at the changeset. You can make corrections yourself: go in t... commented 2026-09-21 18:53:20 UTC by Allison P ♦1,150 |
| 189217188 (Comments: 1) | Rainstone Water Heaters (Discussed changesets: 1) | Removed in changeset 189361046 due to promotional description and invalid tags. Please follow our tagging conventions and do not include promotional material in your edits. See osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers. commented 2026-09-21 18:05:15 UTC by schobbish ♦83 |
| 188896212 (Comments: 2) | SkySide (Discussed changesets: 2) | The path through the Hilton is for guests, I did add the correct path through the building around the perimeter commented 2026-09-21 17:33:20 UTC by SkySide ♦1 |
| 189358778 (Comments: 1) | chath_tsu (Discussed changesets: 17) | right turns from I-5 offramp to 64th are allowed; the arrows on the pavement are one-way reminder arrows and not turn restrictions commented 2026-09-21 16:50:41 UTC by chath_tsu ♦34 |
| 135985165 (Comments: 6) | Stretch Longfellow (Discussed changesets: 44) | Agreed. When I started this project (2017ish), such rules weren't in place, and I admittedly haven't kept up as well as I should have on changes to such rules. I'll work on getting those fixed! commented 2026-09-21 15:11:52 UTC by Stretch Longfellow ♦106 |
| 189353073 (Comments: 1) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 24) | source is AFDC commented 2026-09-21 14:53:35 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦58 |
| 189318388 (Comments: 1) | mikedotd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to oSM! Please be careful! You move the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7915560416 more over 100 meters over other buildings. I correct this to the old position commented 2026-09-21 12:19:48 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,858 |
| 189285830 (Comments: 1) | Nickkkk123 (Discussed changesets: 14) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189345031 commented 2026-09-21 12:16:14 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189324808 (Comments: 1) | dsabey3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be carefull you move the nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/521988427, https://www.osm.org/node/213541432 more than 100 meters over buildings and other streets. I move the node back to the original position. commented 2026-09-21 11:39:34 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,858 |
| 189311918 (Comments: 1) | capitalriftplayer1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This map data is actually used by people. Please don't add junk. commented 2026-09-21 11:10:17 UTC by InsertUser ♦500 |
| 189309317 (Comments: 1) | Blazearator (Discussed changesets: 4) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189339365 commented 2026-09-21 10:13:41 UTC by MappingMore ♦743 |
| 189178910 (Comments: 1) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, there is no need for new electric bicycle tags for the US: electric_bicycle:class_1 is equivalent to electric_bicycle. electric_bicycle:class_2 is equivalent to electric_moped (proposed only) electric_bicycle:class_3 is eq... commented 2026-09-21 10:00:15 UTC by mueschel ♦7,364 |
| 187469768 (Comments: 1) | Christie91277 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1174489610/history - you meant house=terraced, not house=terrace, right? commented 2026-09-21 09:36:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,122 |
| 189310863 (Comments: 1) | Loljhh (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189332077 commented 2026-09-21 07:30:38 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189302273 (Comments: 1) | andrewrunner (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189328712 commented 2026-09-21 06:02:52 UTC by ajmat ♦556 |
| 189280081 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | There were numerous errors with the original set that I wanted to fix. First and foremost, ramps should not have names. The fact that many primary links have names like "Arrivals," "Departures," and "Return to Terminal... commented 2026-09-21 05:40:13 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 188848156 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 299) | Okay, I will stop that. By the way, to save a lot of time, you can just use JOSM. commented 2026-09-21 05:22:44 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦372 |
| 189326459 (Comments: 1) | awdaviswa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. commented 2026-09-21 05:14:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189327329 (Comments: 1) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 31) | See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5528511 commented 2026-09-21 05:01:39 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 188074676 (Comments: 5) | Fountain0206 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Behind the OSM map data is a community of people that agree to some general guidelines about how to do things, and in many cases there are multiple approaches. Why I made a comment, though, is because what you seem to be creating as a standard practi... commented 2026-09-21 05:00:43 UTC by neuhausr ♦366 |
| 189274897 (Comments: 1) | waynejesse12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for the contribution. The opening_hours=* tag has a particular format that helps data consumers be able to more easily process opening hours in a computerized way. If you're interested, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_h... commented 2026-09-21 04:37:29 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 189266414 (Comments: 1) | maxwellward (Discussed changesets: 16) | Thanks. FYI, it looks like you added an extra semicolon at the end. I removed the semicolon. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-21 04:30:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 182854927 (Comments: 7) | RoseBTCmap (Discussed changesets: 6) | Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Good_practice#temporary_events_and_temporary_features_clarification. There is a strong pushback to discuss mapping tempy features elsewhere. Let me suggest joining the OSM US Slack and discuss the is... commented 2026-09-21 02:39:00 UTC by Glassman ♦6,040 |
| 189180210 (Comments: 2) | Darryl Wingfield (Discussed changesets: 1) | Lord have mercy why did you change every state-maintained road to primary and secondary?? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Values and also see how roads are generally tagged in the rest of the state. You will notice that mo... commented 2026-09-21 01:00:33 UTC by diamondarmorsteve ♦75 |
| 189304700 (Comments: 3) | Stetson P (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply, explanation, and understanding despite my typo! commented 2026-09-20 22:05:47 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 189270213 (Comments: 1) | Rush Bowls Rino (Discussed changesets: 1) | As an account mapping on behalf of a commercial business for financial gain, please be advised that you are expected to understand and carefully follow documented OpenStreetMap standards and conventions, which will both directly benefit the quality o... commented 2026-09-20 22:01:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189212152 (Comments: 4) | happy5214 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Unprefixed tags removed (and other minor issues fixed) in changeset 189318702, thanks! commented 2026-09-20 21:46:40 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 162189120 (Comments: 1) | deweyjungles (Discussed changesets: 6) | The correct name is B Bar S, not B Bar South. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189318663 commented 2026-09-20 21:44:20 UTC by Allison P ♦1,150 |
| 189261140 (Comments: 1) | Wtberry (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: If the name of the street isn't correct, you can revise it yourself. I've sent you a DM with a bunch of info on OSM. Let me know if you need more help. --- Published using OSMCha: https://... commented 2026-09-20 21:31:51 UTC by Glassman ♦6,040 |
| 184076163 (Comments: 1) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 77) | Requesting a review of a changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189315049) which changed the route=* type. Thanks! commented 2026-09-20 21:23:15 UTC by pwbriggs ♦498 |
| 187002098 (Comments: 37) | carciofo (Discussed changesets: 21) | We're all here to learn and if you see mistakes in edits I've made, please, point them out. I'd rather learn from a mistake rather than keep making the same mistake over and over and over and over. My definition of "local e... commented 2026-09-20 21:10:29 UTC by txemt ♦86 |
| 189179219 (Comments: 3) | leftybender (Discussed changesets: 12) | Let me go fix that now. I didn't realize that the person who claimed it was fixed was a troll who commented false or vulgar information on a lot of random notes on Jul 30 and has done nothing else with the account. commented 2026-09-20 19:31:10 UTC by tjasz ♦3 |
| 189281269 (Comments: 2) | Potatoleum (Discussed changesets: 3) | I accidentally edited an underground pipeline. I fixed it now. commented 2026-09-20 19:25:26 UTC by Potatoleum ♦4 |
| 189084965 (Comments: 5) | P Diddy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Right, but what is your source for the places closing down? Where or how did you acquire that information? Anything added to OpenStreetMap must be verifiable, see https://osm.wiki/Verifiability , and as DWG member @Glassman reminded you via D... commented 2026-09-20 19:18:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189275944 (Comments: 6) | Cobrapond (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yah thanks for improving your area, happy mapping! commented 2026-09-20 19:08:06 UTC by MassCartog ♦481 |
| 188792013 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 143) | It means not yet used. Unfortunately no option for that in Every Door. commented 2026-09-20 18:40:23 UTC by Omnific ♦241 |
| 189307238 (Comments: 1) | Mr Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted commented 2026-09-20 18:25:42 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,016 |
| 189310315 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 14) | this is adding levels to the buildings I was walking by commented 2026-09-20 18:04:04 UTC by synthfi ♦28 |
| 183935023 (Comments: 1) | BryanOSullivan (Discussed changesets: 11) | If you're connecting a dirt track directly to an interstate highway, you might take a moment to double check conditions around the highway. This changeset connected way/1528232844 to I 15, but as with most interstate highways, there's a fen... commented 2026-09-20 17:02:19 UTC by Kai Johnson ♦182 |
| 189307254 (Comments: 1) | bobthebuilder423468 (Discussed changesets: 35) | sorry I forgot I did a couple other things too! commented 2026-09-20 16:51:52 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦16 |
| 188868038 (Comments: 3) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 34) | Hi cr0wb0y, No worries, and thanks for getting back to me. I just made sure the relevant information is kept on OpenStreetMap while outdated information is removed. Thank you for your contributions, and please let us know if we can be of any h... commented 2026-09-20 12:45:46 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,014 |
| 189128971 (Comments: 2) | WebfootJack (Discussed changesets: 3) | Also, since you are interested in road classification, I'd like to invite you to discuss on the OSM US Slack Server https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ (there is a #highway-classification channel to discuss precisely these sorts of changes) commented 2026-09-20 12:26:48 UTC by 1998alexkane ♦93 |
| 189288865 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 71) | hey, can you guys make sure your edits align with the buildings. some of the roads had overlap and most are now zig zag. alleys are not residential streets commented 2026-09-20 10:03:42 UTC by ieguy3 ♦72 |
| 187610549 (Comments: 2) | kguenther24 (Discussed changesets: 28) | The Esri and Mapbox imagery show the pavilion and some paths under construction, as well as referencing the public diagrams of the park. There are definitely still some missing paths and details though that are harder to map without newer imagery. commented 2026-09-20 05:01:08 UTC by kguenther24 ♦26 |
| 189248075 (Comments: 1) | P Diddy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi P Diddy, Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. However, before you continue to map, please respond to the questions and and follow the feedback given to you on changeset 189084965 , namely to clearly explain your source(s) for the... commented 2026-09-20 02:49:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,175 |
| 189276425 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 71) | the portion of markham from roosevelt to wood is going to be redone and paved according the county transit website commented 2026-09-20 00:22:38 UTC by ieguy3 ♦72 |