Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
53951415 by 23248453 @ 2017-11-20 14:46 | 1 | 2025-04-07 12:44 | GylesLee ♦1 | 你好,这条船底顶的路线虽然大部分还是准确的,但已经是7年前绘制,我打算按我前段时间走的轨迹重新绘制,并删除这条路线,先征求你的同意,谢谢。 |
2 | 2025-04-07 17:21 | 23248453 | 你好,感谢你的联系。我绘制这条路线的时候是参考了户外助手路网以及Strava的路网的,在当时应该是比较准确。当然,这么多年过去了,也许有些地方路线会有改道,需要大家一起来修正。不过,我建议可以局部修正,而... | |
89629588 by CoursSaleya @ 2020-08-19 11:09 | 1 | 2020-10-07 15:04 | 23248453 | Please don't modify features just base on aerial image. You changed the map to align Maxar Imagery. However Maxar Imagery has big offset. Your alignment just made the map worse. |
2 | 2020-10-08 23:40 | CoursSaleya ♦2 | Hi acette, thank you for reaching out and letting me know about the offset in this area - I used Maxar since it’s the most updated, but I can see that Strava shows the offset you’re referring to. Thank you for the fix. I also noticed that after your reversion there are some missing layer... | |
3 | 2020-10-15 08:15 | 23248453 | My reversion deleted your work on fixing map errors. I'm really sorry for that. I made reversion because it is the simplest way to correct the offset problem. It's difficult to fix by hand and no tool can help. Please go ahead to make changes.I'd verified with GPS tracks from ... | |
4 | 2020-10-19 03:39 | CoursSaleya ♦2 | Hey acette, no problem. Thank you for providing further details about imagery in Guangzhou - that’s really helpful! Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any more questions or concerns! | |
89726034 by Santurce @ 2020-08-21 06:33 | 1 | 2020-10-07 14:48 | 23248453 | Please don't modify features just base on aerial image. You changed the map to align Maxar Imagery. However Maxar Imagery has big offset. Your alignment just made the map worse. |
2 | 2020-10-08 23:58 | Santurce ♦4 | Thanks for the info about the offset here acette. | |
89731149 by MatterOmaps @ 2020-08-21 08:04 | 1 | 2020-10-07 14:48 | 23248453 | Please don't modify features just base on aerial image. You changed LuHu outline to align Maxar Imagery. However Maxar Imagery has big offset. Your alignment just made the map worse. |
2 | 2020-10-09 00:02 | MatterOmaps ♦4 | Hi acette, thank you for reaching out, I agree with your offset analysis after checking with Strava, thanks for the fix. | |
66568513 by Kingtin @ 2019-01-23 12:48 | 1 | 2019-07-07 16:51 | 23248453 | 为啥把军区内部的道路都标记成三级道路呢?不属于公共道路系统啊 |
71524424 by Kingtin @ 2019-06-23 06:45 | 1 | 2019-06-30 15:28 | 23248453 | 有部分人行道直接使用了用地边界(重叠),我在修改相关元素的时候把人行道删除了。道路应当是独立的线。 |
63347677 by sunsuuuuun @ 2018-10-09 13:57 | 1 | 2018-12-15 13:54 | 23248453 | footway=sidewalk 是指“人行道”——大马路两旁供行人行走的,用于巷子不合适。直接用 highway=footway “步行道路”就可以了。 |
61317913 by CnEnTranslateBot @ 2018-08-03 06:40 | 1 | 2018-08-09 14:19 | 23248453 | 请不要将footway修改为alley。highway=service,service=alley是行车道路,参考https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley :If a narrow street is prohibited for motor vehicles, consider using highway=footway or highway=pedestrian. |
2 | 2018-08-11 16:36 | CnEnTranslateBot ♦2 | 您好。1. service=alley并没有提到是行车道路。2. 注意到用词是"consider",并不是"should", "must",没有要求一定要用footway.3. 从定义上,alley远比footway合适:(1) narrow service road usually located between properties to provi... | |
3 | 2018-08-12 03:21 | 23248453 | 首先,看看highway=service的useful combinations就可知service road基本上都是用作行车道路,而alley是service road的一种子类型。再看footway的解释:For designated footpaths, i.e. mainly/exclusively for pedestrians. 并且内文中也解释了很多使用场景。从... | |
4 | 2018-08-15 04:43 | CnEnTranslateBot ♦2 | 您好,您的回复已仔细阅读。从分类上来看,alley就与footway有本质上的区别。从Highway的分类来说,service road(包括alley)是roads的一种,而footway是Path的一种。Roads的标签有种种不同,主要由重要度区分,每一类道路在路网中... | |
5 | 2018-08-16 14:47 | 23248453 | 我一定程度上认同你关于城市路网的观点,但是我不认为highway=*下的几大分类(road,linked road,path,special road type...)是区分是否属于城市路网的分类依据,因而对于你认为的service road是路网的组成部分而footway不应属于路网的... | |
6 | 2018-08-21 01:47 | 23248453 | 再思考了一下,我们关注的问题都是毛细路网的级别区分度不够:按照我的方式,缺乏小巷和非重要人行路径的区分;按照你的方式,分辨不出一般街道和窄巷。理想情况是增加新的标签,但要推广至广泛接受,可行性很低。... | |
59653666 by 87188358 @ 2018-06-08 03:38 | 1 | 2018-06-16 13:34 | 23248453 | way 499672950 你是根据什么修改的呢?改得完全错误了。原来的路线我是实地GPS记录过轨迹的,而且卫星图上也能看得出来。 |
59695549 by j694936 @ 2018-06-09 17:10 | 1 | 2018-06-16 12:24 | 23248453 | 你的一个修改集合太大了 |
2 | 2018-06-16 12:28 | 23248453 | 白云山景区内的路在大部分时间内都是不允许机动车通行的,将其设置为 motor_vehicle=designated 并不合适 | |
56084722 by sunsuuuuun @ 2018-02-05 13:17 | 1 | 2018-02-13 05:38 | 23248453 | 住宅小区的attribute是:place=neighbourhood + landuse=residential请不要删除neighbourhood标签。见:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_China |
55070205 by Frederick Tang @ 2018-01-01 06:56 | 1 | 2018-02-12 08:03 | 23248453 | sidewalk是路边人行道;内街小巷不应该设置为sidewalk |
54022088 by Carson_gor @ 2017-11-23 10:07 | 1 | 2018-01-21 09:00 | 23248453 | 地铁出入口的ref是有标准规范的,如 “A”,“B1”,参见 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=subway_entrance你将它们改成 "EXIT A" 是错误的修改。我会将这些修改回退。 |
2 | 2018-01-21 12:50 | Carson_gor ♦7 | sorry , please not to modify the text. It is used "EXIT A" on the station. so it should used EXIT A | |
3 | 2018-01-24 01:32 | 23248453 | Sorry I was too fast.But I saw most of the subway entrances in Guanghzou are named into "station name + ref". Perhaps you have to persuade mappers who contribute on Guangzhou subway a lot, e.g. 羊角忠实黑, otherwise they will modify them back. | |
55128758 by Frederick Tang @ 2018-01-03 13:15 | 1 | 2018-01-17 05:45 | 23248453 | 玉带濠我实地考察过,是人行街道,车辆无法进入的。生活性街道是汽车可以进入的居民区道路。这个属性更改并不妥当。 |
2 | 2018-01-20 05:24 | 23248453 | reverted | |
54475937 by HolloWorld @ 2017-12-09 04:38 | 1 | 2017-12-09 10:02 | 23248453 | A guide on modelling using aerial imagery: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling |
54275470 by itsl @ 2017-12-02 16:53 | 1 | 2017-12-06 05:39 | 23248453 | 欢迎参与到OSM的编辑,这是一个充满探索乐趣的地图世界!一些参考资料可以看看: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:China_Tagging_Guidelines |
53811593 by HolloWorld @ 2017-11-15 18:03 | 1 | 2017-12-03 16:22 | 23248453 | 請注意當衛星不是在正上方,可看到建築物側面時,不要將建築物側面也描繪出來。地圖上應當是建築物的平面圖。同時要留心衛星影像的位置偏移。 |
2 | 2017-12-03 16:30 | 23248453 | 例如這個:https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/496481783 (我已恢復,show more 可以看到區別) | |
3 | 2017-12-04 05:36 | HolloWorld ♦40 | Thanks for the advises ! | |
53687069 by Seandebasti @ 2017-11-11 10:12 | 1 | 2017-11-30 16:16 | 23248453 | The city is changing rapidly and the images are outdate. Please don't edit map just base on aerial image.You have mapped some man mades which were disappear or rebuilded. |
2 | 2017-12-03 12:48 | Seandebasti ♦124 | can you refer to an example that I understand, thx | |
3 | 2017-12-03 16:15 | 23248453 | You had made too many changes in this changeset and I can't find them out. One example I can remember is a chimney which has been pulled down.You are welcome to map China area. There are a large of empty area on map. But I would suggest to avoid map urban area without local knowledge, since m... | |
54172298 by wei_z @ 2017-11-29 09:50 | 1 | 2017-11-30 16:12 | 23248453 | 请注意卫星图的位置可能有偏差的,要比较几种不同卫星图册和周围已有地图特征的位置来确定。特别是高层建筑,在卫星图中是侧面拍摄的时候,不能按照屋顶的位置来描绘。 |
53797356 by sunsuuuuun @ 2017-11-15 09:53 | 1 | 2017-11-16 04:21 | 23248453 | 孙中山像不应该设置 amenity=place_of_worship,这个tag是用于宗教场所的,例如寺庙、教堂等,参见:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship对于户外雕塑,应该使用 tourism=artwork 和 artwork_type=sculpture |
53667155 by sunsuuuuun @ 2017-11-10 13:50 | 1 | 2017-11-14 05:28 | 23248453 | 暨南大学不是一个行政区域,添加 admin_level 和 boundary=administrative 是不适当的 |
2 | 2017-11-14 05:32 | 23248453 | “根据缺省名称遵从本地语言的规则,中国大陆区域的名称应使用简体中文字符。其他语言译名,包括少数民族语言文字,请使用 name:code=* 独立标注。”https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:China_Tagging_Guidelines | |
53559649 by sunsuuuuun @ 2017-11-06 16:49 | 1 | 2017-11-09 05:58 | 23248453 | 欢迎来到OSM。请参考 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:China_Tagging_Guidelines,了解大陆地区作图规则。名称只需中文,英文地名应该放在多语言的英文标签之下。 |
2 | 2017-11-09 05:58 | 23248453 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:China_Tagging_Guidelines | |
53494162 by Esperanza36 @ 2017-11-04 02:57 | 1 | 2017-11-09 05:41 | 23248453 | man_made=tower 是塔,子类型包括通信塔、暸望塔、灯塔、钟楼等等(见https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:type)。你将高层建筑的类型修改为“塔”不太合适。 |
53055497 by 茶雲卡頓 @ 2017-10-19 00:39 | 1 | 2017-10-23 06:56 | 23248453 | 缺省名称遵从本地语言,不应该加上英文。其他语言译名使用 name:code=* 独立标注,地图软件根据当前语言配置选项会自动显示。 |
28201126 by 单人旁 @ 2015-01-17 04:47 | 1 | 2017-10-17 01:12 | 23248453 | 请问这些溪流是根据什么数据来源画出来的呢? |
52594604 by Austin Zhu @ 2017-10-03 12:20 | 1 | 2017-10-05 08:07 | 23248453 | 这个changeset修改了一万个node,查看了一部分,都是将经纬度都增加了0.0000003,是不是一个错误的提交? |
2 | 2017-10-06 04:51 | Austin Zhu ♦34 | 是的。。。 | |
52279386 by 20isa @ 2017-09-22 14:55 | 1 | 2017-09-30 01:48 | 23248453 | 篮球场:sport=basketballleisure=pitch |
2 | 2017-09-30 01:49 | 23248453 | 宿舍:building=dormitory | |
52167119 by 来自青山下 @ 2017-09-19 08:33 | 1 | 2017-09-20 06:05 | 23248453 | 你确认“乃千多”这个名字不是笔误吗?应该是“乃干多”吧? |
2 | 2017-09-21 00:37 | 来自青山下 ♦1 | 谢谢提示,参考天地图,修正为乃干多。 | |
51743219 by 几把彦 @ 2017-09-05 09:28 | 1 | 2017-09-13 16:26 | 23248453 | 你将地图改乱了,如果不是确认的修改请不要保存 |
2 | 2017-09-15 06:24 | 23248453 | 已经修复错误的路:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52058440 | |
52030483 by Zhang Tai @ 2017-09-14 08:59 | 1 | 2017-09-15 05:49 | 23248453 | building=apartment |
52030665 by Zhang Tai @ 2017-09-14 09:07 | 1 | 2017-09-15 05:45 | 23248453 | 住宅楼:building=apartment |
52011507 by 20isa @ 2017-09-13 15:54 | 1 | 2017-09-13 16:54 | 23248453 | 请问原来地图上广东工业大学是否有错误呢?为什么需要把它删除了? |
51926525 by n_near @ 2017-09-11 05:00 | 1 | 2017-09-13 15:48 | 23248453 | 欢迎!这次修改有几个问题:1. 白云堡是属于居住区吧?为什么要将landuse=residential删除呢?2. 请不要添加对别人无意义的信息(“黑客他家”) |
2 | 2017-09-14 06:53 | n_near ♦1 | 1.没印象了,可能我不小心点错了吧2.开个玩笑开个玩笑 | |
3 | 2017-09-14 07:02 | n_near ♦1 | 不好意思 | |
51367582 by 茶雲卡頓 @ 2017-08-23 09:07 | 1 | 2017-09-02 11:57 | 23248453 | alley 是可以行车的,只能行人的用 footpath |
46681721 by 羊角忠实黑 @ 2017-03-08 14:16 | 1 | 2017-08-30 18:43 | 23248453 | 兰亭盛荟东区(建设中):landuse=constructionconstruction=residential |
51429841 by 23248453 @ 2017-08-25 10:19 | 1 | 2017-08-26 16:10 | Supaplex ♦10,446 | 我覺得只要是軍方管理的都可以加上landuse=military |
2 | 2017-08-30 18:07 | 23248453 | landuse=military 在地图上会显示为很显眼的禁区,而这个医院是对普通民众提供服务的 | |
51574624 by 茶雲卡頓 @ 2017-08-30 11:54 | 1 | 2017-08-30 16:46 | 23248453 | 农田应该用 landuse=farmland, village_green是城市绿化带 |
51572164 by sn0wblind @ 2017-08-30 10:46 | 1 | 2017-08-30 16:14 | 23248453 | 为何删除临江大道临时便道呢?改道已经至少一年了,我昨天经过依然是要改道的,而且看起来还要持续很长一段时间。原来的路已经废弃了,也不知道施工完成后是否会恢复原来的走向。 |
51109259 by 24j @ 2017-08-14 12:06 | 1 | 2017-08-28 06:03 | 23248453 | 临时性的地标没有必要加入OSM了,依赖OSM的各种地图服务的更新通常都数月甚至更久 |
51030634 by 茶雲卡頓 @ 2017-08-11 11:32 | 1 | 2017-08-25 10:42 | 23248453 | 应该首先标注现今正式地名,旧名作为注释 |
51048610 by 茶雲卡頓 @ 2017-08-12 03:14 | 1 | 2017-08-17 06:26 | 23248453 | 请问为何要将 Node 244085033 删除呢?这个点是越秀区 relation的一部分,标记为 as admin_centre |
51135104 by 茶雲卡頓 @ 2017-08-15 09:44 | 1 | 2017-08-16 06:01 | 23248453 | 你将很多街道(boundary: administrative)相关的 admin_center 改名成与街道名不一致的名字,我认为这些名字不应该修改,因为它反映街道(是大陆城市中的行政区域,不是一条街)的名字。 |
51134641 by 茶雲卡頓 @ 2017-08-15 09:31 | 1 | 2017-08-16 05:57 | 23248453 | 这个点是“Part of Relation 光塔街道 (4069906) (as admin_centre)”,改名为惠福不合适。 |
51135413 by 茶雲卡頓 @ 2017-08-15 09:53 | 1 | 2017-08-16 05:54 | 23248453 | 这个point是:“Part of Relation 大塘街道 (4069912) (as admin_centre)”不应该改名为大东门。可以另外创建大东门的point,准确位置应该在东濠涌与中山路交界处。 |
51134775 by 茶雲卡頓 @ 2017-08-15 09:35 | 1 | 2017-08-16 05:48 | 23248453 | 这个point是relation的一部分,是珠光街道的admin_centra,改名为“南关”是否不太妥当?如果要标记南关这一地名,添加一个新的point更合适吧?见历史:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3098740420/history |
48855452 by nmsl🤣 @ 2017-05-21 05:48 | 1 | 2017-08-08 06:01 | 23248453 | Subway entrance:railway=subway_entranceref=Aname=体育中心A |
49997143 by Ab_Travel @ 2017-07-03 02:13 | 1 | 2017-07-04 05:36 | 23248453 | The location of POIs are wrong. Maybe because of the map offset in China. |
49292029 by Nathalie legendre @ 2017-06-06 02:46 | 1 | 2017-06-13 01:38 | 23248453 | It's duplicated. IKEA was already on map. |
46698811 by Eva Blue @ 2017-03-09 04:45 | 1 | 2017-05-14 04:37 | 23248453 | Your change set removed a building -- you must see garden from satellite map and believe it's on the ground -- actually the garden is on the roof of the building! |
43957059 by 23248453 @ 2016-11-26 03:44 | 1 | 2016-11-26 04:47 | Supaplex ♦10,446 | railway=subway_entranceref=D |
2 | 2016-12-18 05:07 | 23248453 | thanks, done. |