Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-04-16 21:53:15 UTCbigfatfrog67 Hi, I'm concerned that you are using copyrighted material as a source for these map changes?
Jonathan
22017-04-16 22:26:45 UTCwhat_what What changes are you referring to?
32017-04-16 22:47:01 UTCwhat_what OK I have worked out what you are referring too. The original link I used is no longer working, it is now http://www.malvernhills.org.uk/media/1102/cycling-on-the-malverns-information-sheet-2016.pdf
The reference to this PDF is for the change of Access. The path was already on the OSM before I ma...
42017-04-19 08:27:13 UTCbigfatfrog67 OK. I feel it is always best practice to base changes on a survey because while we may not be restricted by the OS copyright we don't know what copyright the Malvern Hills Trust may be applying.
52017-04-19 08:34:53 UTCwhat_what I'm in contact with and working with the Malvern Hills Trust to update OSM.
62017-04-20 09:40:37 UTCbigfatfrog67 OK thanks, sounds like you've got it all covered.
12016-06-19 21:34:43 UTCbigfatfrog67 Checking against an OS Map is in breach of OS Copyright. What was "checked"?
22016-06-19 22:26:21 UTCwhat_what This was a removal of a path that I knew was not there from personal knowledge but I also checked that it did not appear on the OS map to confirm my belief.
2 changeset(s) created by what_what have been discussed with a total of 8 comment(s)