| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45950418 by what_what | 1 | 2017-04-16 21:53:15 UTC | bigfatfrog67 | Hi, I'm concerned that you are using copyrighted material as a source for these map changes?Jonathan |
| 2 | 2017-04-16 22:26:45 UTC | what_what | What changes are you referring to? | |
| 3 | 2017-04-16 22:47:01 UTC | what_what | OK I have worked out what you are referring too. The original link I used is no longer working, it is now http://www.malvernhills.org.uk/media/1102/cycling-on-the-malverns-information-sheet-2016.pdf The reference to this PDF is for the change of Access. The path was already on the OSM before I ma... | |
| 4 | 2017-04-19 08:27:13 UTC | bigfatfrog67 | OK. I feel it is always best practice to base changes on a survey because while we may not be restricted by the OS copyright we don't know what copyright the Malvern Hills Trust may be applying. | |
| 5 | 2017-04-19 08:34:53 UTC | what_what | I'm in contact with and working with the Malvern Hills Trust to update OSM. | |
| 6 | 2017-04-20 09:40:37 UTC | bigfatfrog67 | OK thanks, sounds like you've got it all covered. | |
| 39450552 by what_what | 1 | 2016-06-19 21:34:43 UTC | bigfatfrog67 | Checking against an OS Map is in breach of OS Copyright. What was "checked"? |
| 2 | 2016-06-19 22:26:21 UTC | what_what | This was a removal of a path that I knew was not there from personal knowledge but I also checked that it did not appear on the OS map to confirm my belief. | |