| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51155875 by dmogle @ 2017-08-16 01:32 | 1 | 2017-08-18 17:56 | treestryder ♦184 | It is great to have another Lansing mapper.I'm not sure that the nodes you added, with only a Name tag will ever be rendered. You may want to at least add shop=yes ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop "Shop yes" in OSMand) or office=* ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/... |
| 2 | 2017-08-18 19:57 | dmogle | Yeah, I did these real quick on my phone while I was walking by. Planning to come back and flesh them out someday when I have time. So maybe never :/ | |
| 3 | 2017-08-18 20:43 | treestryder ♦184 | I completely understand. | |
| 47912826 by dmogle @ 2017-04-18 17:26 | 1 | 2017-04-18 20:23 | treestryder ♦184 | I could be wrong and in this case, it might be fine. However, it has been my experience that it is preferred to have a generic building, with a detailed POI Node. ... It is simple matter to upgrade a POI, by surrounding it with a generic building. It works well for buildings containing multiple POI ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 21:25 | treestryder ♦184 | I stand corrected by the following article...https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element |