Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-12-04 13:23:48 UTCSHARCRASH Hello HAL! Sorry to say this but you've repositioned the way for these steps not correctly. Their descent is nearly straight, slightly curved to the left, not much curved to the right as you had repositioned, according my memory, my GPS trace (here: https:/...
22017-12-04 16:41:34 UTCHAL_lux Hi,

Thank you for your comment and correcting my mistake. Unfortunately I couldn't´t access your link to the GPS trace as they are not public. If you encounter any more errors feel free to correct them :)
32017-12-04 16:49:35 UTCSHARCRASH SOrry i gave you the link from the brower, not the accessible link, indeed my traces are private. Here:
12016-07-04 09:27:31 UTCSHARCRASH Hello HAL_Lux!

For this way You've set it as access=private and bicycle=yes. Doesn't this mean instead that its access is permissive?

Also, if bicycles have access, wouldn't pedestrians (foot) have the same right of access?
22016-07-04 10:55:28 UTCHAL_lux Hi,

Oh yes i see.... i didn't see the bicycle tag, i will remove it later, since there is a "Chemin privé" sign
32016-07-04 16:31:02 UTCSHARCRASH Thanks for the response! I corrected anyway since I noticed another tag issue on the same way + others (route=bicycle should only be used on relations), will check if there is a cycling route. :)
42016-07-05 04:47:39 UTCHAL_lux Thanks to you too for correcting it :) It was on the Auto-Pédestre of Steinfort i've noticed it that it was a private path... btw, it was a nice little circuit ;)
12016-05-13 16:07:44 UTCSHARCRASH Hello! Does this path continue?
22016-05-13 16:37:49 UTCHAL_lux Hi, apperently it does... but a man i've encountered on that way said to me that it was way too dangerous to continue on that track because of the many sinkholes and crevices there. So i've mapped only where i encountered him with a hazard tag...
32016-05-13 16:41:20 UTCSHARCRASH OK! I will check it one of these next days. I added a fixme=continue just in case i forget. Thank you! :)
42016-05-13 16:46:55 UTCHAL_lux No Problem, but be careful and just walk it on your own risk. I will have a look on it here on OSM, but personally i will never walk it again ;)
52016-05-13 16:55:25 UTCSHARCRASH OK! Thanks for the advice but you increased even more my curiosity. LOL
62016-05-14 08:26:26 UTCSHARCRASH I checked it yesterday, needed a walk anyway... even had a rain shower, LOL. The 1st large part of the way is actually a track unused for long, so i changed tags accordingly, added details and the noexit tag on the final node. The rest is not even a path since no sign of recurrent use, just less lit...
3 changeset(s) created by HAL_lux have been discussed with a total of 13 comment(s)