| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 125777126 by HAL_lux @ 2022-09-04 15:24 | 1 | 2022-09-04 16:27 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hi HAL_lux! Welcome back, long time no see. :) FYI, fenced=yes is deprecated now. The key barrier=* regroups all values for all barriers such as wall, hedge, etc. The sub key fence_type=* is still active though. More infos on the key barriers here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barr... |
| 2 | 2022-09-04 16:42 | HAL_lux | Hi Sharcrash,Indeed, a long time ago, very long... ;) Seems that i missed it that this tag is not longer use. Thanks for updating it :)Have a great evening :) | |
| 51182148 by HAL_lux @ 2017-08-16 17:38 | 1 | 2018-06-21 21:36 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hi HAL, did the crossing that was here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/321536339 (also visible on any Geoportail.lu image sat.) moved where you placed it here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1555778496 ? Some months ago, i had a ride there and i don't recall any changes of the trail an... |
| 2 | 2018-06-26 17:20 | HAL_lux | Hi,You´re a day late and a dollar short, aren´t you? That´s almost 1 year ago I did modify the way so if you think that I´m wrong please feel free to modify it :)Btw. You were right on that way in Boulaide, so I´ve deleted mine.. | |
| 3 | 2018-06-27 12:49 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Well, i don't know if you're wrong and i said i don't recall any change yet i'm unsure, that's why i'm asking you for the reason why the change. ;) OK I'll change it then since i don't recall any change, the image sat shows the crossway being on the other plac... | |
| 46745265 by HAL_lux @ 2017-03-10 18:10 | 1 | 2018-03-05 10:36 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hello! I see that you've cut this way and added fixme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479762849 I'm wondering if it actually should be in this way position i've inserted now https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566639653. I've plotted mine thanks to Geoportail.lu's im sat 201... |
| 2 | 2018-03-05 18:47 | HAL_lux | Hi,Yes indeed i cut that way because i didn´t know how to map the surface of that. Did you walk the Auto-Pédestre of Boulaide 2? That way is part of it, so i´ve checked and it seems that you´re right. On my GPS data it goes straight as yours, but, there are several other... | |
| 53903371 by HAL_lux @ 2017-11-18 15:07 | 1 | 2018-02-16 10:04 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hi HAL! About the parc Edmond Dume and its ways behind the Miami University (MUDEC) in Differdange, isn't all that private? |
| 2 | 2018-02-16 10:05 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Right now i'm editing them but I've put a stop, please don't edit or will get conflicts. Thanks! :) | |
| 3 | 2018-02-16 10:17 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Found my answer: http://www.differdange.lu/visiteurs/parcs/parc-edmond-dune/I used to work there more than 10 years ago and at that time it was private. | |
| 4 | 2018-02-16 17:44 | HAL_lux | Hi,I´ve walked there many times so it is of course open to the public, as you read on the site of the commune of Differdange.Have a nice weekend :) | |
| 5 | 2018-02-16 20:11 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | I used to work at MUDEC a long time ago. It was private at that time. Thank you and you too have a nice weekend! :) | |
| 54079101 by HAL_lux @ 2017-11-25 18:27 | 1 | 2017-12-04 13:23 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hello HAL! Sorry to say this but you've repositioned the way for these steps not correctly. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95464018 Their descent is nearly straight, slightly curved to the left, not much curved to the right as you had repositioned, according my memory, my GPS trace (here: ht... |
| 2 | 2017-12-04 16:41 | HAL_lux | Hi,Thank you for your comment and correcting my mistake. Unfortunately I couldn't´t access your link to the GPS trace as they are not public. If you encounter any more errors feel free to correct them :) | |
| 3 | 2017-12-04 16:49 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | SOrry i gave you the link from the brower, not the accessible link, indeed my traces are private. Here: https://www.gpsies.com/map.do?fileId=cylzufcuulocrqrk&authkey=AA06EE4F27F57D10077854962983CA6A472E76E3F1ED9592 | |
| 40459427 by HAL_lux @ 2016-07-03 14:22 | 1 | 2016-07-04 09:27 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hello HAL_Lux! For this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38684925 You've set it as access=private and bicycle=yes. Doesn't this mean instead that its access is permissive?Also, if bicycles have access, wouldn't pedestrians (foot) have the same right of access? |
| 2 | 2016-07-04 10:55 | HAL_lux | Hi,Oh yes i see.... i didn't see the bicycle tag, i will remove it later, since there is a "Chemin privé" sign | |
| 3 | 2016-07-04 16:31 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Thanks for the response! I corrected anyway since I noticed another tag issue on the same way + others (route=bicycle should only be used on relations), will check if there is a cycling route. :) | |
| 4 | 2016-07-05 04:47 | HAL_lux | Thanks to you too for correcting it :) It was on the Auto-Pédestre of Steinfort i've noticed it that it was a private path... btw, it was a nice little circuit ;) | |
| 37782391 by HAL_lux @ 2016-03-12 12:45 | 1 | 2016-05-13 16:07 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | Hello! Does this path continue?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403277999 |
| 2 | 2016-05-13 16:37 | HAL_lux | Hi, apperently it does... but a man i've encountered on that way said to me that it was way too dangerous to continue on that track because of the many sinkholes and crevices there. So i've mapped only where i encountered him with a hazard tag... | |
| 3 | 2016-05-13 16:41 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | OK! I will check it one of these next days. I added a fixme=continue just in case i forget. Thank you! :) | |
| 4 | 2016-05-13 16:46 | HAL_lux | No Problem, but be careful and just walk it on your own risk. I will have a look on it here on OSM, but personally i will never walk it again ;) | |
| 5 | 2016-05-13 16:55 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | OK! Thanks for the advice but you increased even more my curiosity. LOL | |
| 6 | 2016-05-14 08:26 | SHARCRASH ♦752 | I checked it yesterday, needed a walk anyway... even had a rain shower, LOL. The 1st large part of the way is actually a track unused for long, so i changed tags accordingly, added details and the noexit tag on the final node. The rest is not even a path since no sign of recurrent use, just less lit... |