Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
60247542 by bogdan_andrei @ 2018-06-28 12:19 | 1 | 2019-01-21 11:57 | Minh Nguyen ♦564 | Thanks for untangling this road and all its turn restrictions into a proper dual carriageway. That must’ve been quite tedious! Unfortunately, this changeset introduced numerous routing errors, including broken road and bus route relations, missing turn restrictions, and missing traffic lights ... |
2 | 2019-01-21 12:04 | bogdan_andrei | Thank you for your updates! I'll keep in mind those aspects next time. | |
42271527 by bogdan_andrei @ 2016-09-19 14:13 | 1 | 2019-01-04 22:33 | AndreThib ♦5 | Hello! It looks like lane tags were added to Churchill Street located at 42.366583, -83.091421. However, Churchill street is a oneway up until shortly before it intersects with West Grand Boulevard. I have removed the lane=backward tag in favor of a oneway=yes tag as I believe it better represents t... |
2 | 2019-01-07 06:53 | bogdan_andrei | Thank you for the update,Bogdan Petrea | |
63295183 by shadty @ 2018-10-08 04:15 | 1 | 2018-10-26 07:44 | bogdan_andrei | Hi. I saw that you changed the one way to bidirectional, but using imagery(Digital Globe Premium) it's not clear that this way is bidirectional. Did you used any source?Thank you! |
2 | 2018-10-26 08:44 | shadty ♦12 | Hi bogdanp_telenav,Thanks for the update. Missed disconnecting the segment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/232957559. The segment to the right should have been bidirectional not the entire way.Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.Please let us know if you have an... | |
62340889 by bogdan_andrei @ 2018-09-06 11:55 | 1 | 2018-09-07 01:42 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | These ways are just in an apartment complex, and not named. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62340889 |
2 | 2018-09-07 01:42 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | These ways are just in an apartment complex, and not named. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62340889 | |
3 | 2018-09-07 01:43 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,108 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62359099 where the changeset comment is: Restoring noname=yes as verified on the ground. | |
4 | 2018-09-07 06:26 | bogdan_andrei | Hi. I took the names from tiger data 2017. Thanks for your feedback and your corrections. | |
41775223 by bogdan_andrei @ 2016-08-29 11:23 | 1 | 2016-09-08 16:16 | RoadGeek_MD99 ♦41 | Based on Bing image, I don't think this is one-way, as the yellow stripe and the turn channel to 44 Business show two-way travel. |
2 | 2016-09-09 05:32 | bogdan_andrei | Do you refer to Canal Street(way: 159118954) ? | |
3 | 2016-09-09 11:29 | RoadGeek_MD99 ♦41 | Sorry, yes, way/159118954 | |
4 | 2016-09-09 12:11 | bogdan_andrei | For adding one way i used ImproveOSM with TrafficFlowDirection function, and from 810 trips, 100% of the drivers go in that direction. The yellow strip is to separate the drivers who come from Lytle Avenue and those who come from Canal Street in south direction. I think this is the right solution. I... | |
5 | 2016-09-09 12:37 | RoadGeek_MD99 ♦41 | Thanks for the reply. I believe way/206465488 would have no purpose if way/159118954 was one-way (one-way now removed). I have seen a small number of the 100% ImproveOSM trips where the opposite direction had a very clear yellow line and a stop line at the intersection for 2 way travel. The yello... |