Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
157627743 by jmarkell036 @ 2024-10-08 13:43 | 1 | 2025-03-26 17:46 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi jmarkell036, For a short term closure of Hill Road, I think access:conditional opening_hours on barrier nodes at each end of the closure would be better. No idea how exactly to do this. Personally, I wouldn't bother with closures for a couple weekends during the Fall. I did restore the ro... |
140917992 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2023-09-07 01:31 | 1 | 2024-11-28 18:28 | marczoutendijk ♦2,755 | Hi,About this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205663877landuse=area is nonsense! Have you ever seen landuse which is NOT an area?Please read this:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features#Landuselanduse=* should describe the type of landuse, not its dimensions.Marc Zout... |
2 | 2025-02-15 21:45 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Sorry about that typo and fixed it. | |
141082045 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2023-09-10 21:10 | 1 | 2024-08-26 05:38 | ivanbranco ♦2,698 | Hi RoadGeek,https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/391846890what's the meaning of building=layer?thanks and good mapping! |
2 | 2025-02-15 21:43 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Sorry about that and fixed it. | |
158192546 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2024-10-22 01:59 | 1 | 2025-01-03 14:17 | Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,069 | HelloWhy was this ramp tagged as a path?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38176253Is the ramp being demolished?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix |
2 | 2025-02-15 21:36 | RoadGeek_MD99 | You're right. I've changed these ramps to demolished or abandoned:highway= motorway_links and removed the other tags. | |
140563888 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2023-08-30 00:53 | 1 | 2023-08-31 06:42 | watmildon ♦246 | Hello! There's a bit of a data issue with the Rapid address feed right now. If you happen to know the addr:city for these it would be good to get them patched up as "Unincorporated" isn't a real postal city. ha.Just a heads up. I've posted about it here:https://commu... |
2 | 2023-09-01 16:44 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Thanks! I was trying to fix them as soon I created them, but a few Unincorporated cities slipped by. I've used Overpass to clean up all of them in Howard County. | |
3 | 2023-09-01 18:32 | watmildon ♦246 | No worries at all. It's quite sneaky! | |
90490864 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2020-09-06 19:14 | 1 | 2021-09-15 04:34 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | The new MD imagery show this area well. It has the new circle too. Want to update? |
2 | 2021-09-15 10:56 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Done and thanks for the comment! | |
110938331 by ElliottPlack @ 2021-09-08 20:53 | 1 | 2021-09-09 01:11 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hey Elliott, Did you mean to remove both the address and building tags or was that OsmAnd Maps? I see the building is for lease. Thanks and Happy Mapping, RoadGeek_MD99 |
2 | 2021-09-09 01:14 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | Oops this was supposed to be a note. It is out of business but OsmAnd seems to have made the edit | |
3 | 2021-09-09 01:16 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | Just reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110942674 | |
4 | 2021-09-09 01:17 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | And downgraded thanks to ID's friendly button for that https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110942706 | |
107281756 by amuppidi @ 2021-07-01 22:37 | 1 | 2021-08-21 00:41 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Amuppidi,I noticed you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/960213544, a jug handle from MD 32 SB to Dayton. Sorry to say, but I had to delete this, as the new construction of southbound MD 32 has erased this ramp. You can see this in https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=196870435615529&a... |
2 | 2021-08-21 03:48 | amuppidi ♦16 | okay that’s fine! thanks for letting me know! | |
74761530 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2019-09-22 00:42 | 1 | 2021-03-08 20:32 | DUGA ♦549 | Hi,Any reason of network=US:MD -> building=US:MD? |
2 | 2021-03-08 21:14 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Not sure how building=US:MD got set. Another mapper has fixed it. | |
91115049 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2020-09-18 13:23 | 1 | 2020-09-19 00:54 | DoctorSpeck ♦53 | awesome fix. Question for you though, Why put zip_code on a street? it would seem that postal codes are properties of addresses not the streets (rural areas can be one zip on one side and another zip on the other) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org... |
2 | 2020-09-19 12:44 | RoadGeek_MD99 | You're right, postal codes are properties of addresses, but it is acceptable/optional to put postal_code on the street (see wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:postal_code). | |
88952424 by tornado0910 @ 2020-08-05 01:24 | 1 | 2020-08-05 02:08 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Tornado0910,Thanks for all the work in Harford County. I noticed you added Aqua Culture at 22 Newport Dr. Are you sure of that location, as it is already mapped on Commerce Rd (just northeast of the end of the runway)? I was at 22 Newport on Aug 1st, and it was a vacant building. Thanks a... |
2 | 2020-08-05 15:38 | tornado0910 ♦11 | Hey RoadGeek_MD99!I’m glad you pointed that out to me. Now that I think of it I’m not exactly sure. When mapping Newport Drive I was referring to Google maps and street view imagery, as well as my memory. However, Google still said that Aqua Culture was still at 22 Newport, but Googl... | |
75204687 by ElliottPlack @ 2019-10-02 22:47 | 1 | 2019-12-17 12:06 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Re-opened Triadelphia Road bridge westbound over MD 32 only per survey (https://openstreetcam.org/details/2064838/1527/track-info) and https://twitter.com/MDSHA/status/1143149838797803523; https://www.roads.maryland.gov/pages/release.aspx?newsId=3480 |
76885390 by craigbeale @ 2019-11-11 03:42 | 1 | 2019-12-04 03:24 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Craig,Welcome to OSM! I noticed you edited the parking aisles for the shopping center in Columbia that has the Ale House Columbia. Unfortunately, the parking lot was been re-built after the Bing imagery was taken. You should check out the "MD Latest 6 Inch Aerial Imagery", which ... |
69460872 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2019-04-22 16:55 | 1 | 2019-09-29 15:48 | user_5359 ♦19,400 | Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6421541605/history! What ist the meaning of the U in the value open hours/opening_hours? |
2 | 2019-09-30 15:45 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi. My image of the opening hours was too blurry, so I've removed it (and the fixme). | |
49057765 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2017-05-29 01:05 | 1 | 2019-08-31 05:15 | user_5359 ♦19,400 | Hello! Short question to the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169787185/history : You add aeroway=taxiway (group aeroplane) and service=spur (group railway) in these changeset to the building. Is there a reason for this? |
2 | 2019-08-31 11:23 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Looks like a mistake (hot keys?) and has been removed. Thanks! | |
56566604 by Mapspro9 @ 2018-02-22 01:49 | 1 | 2019-01-22 17:32 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Umm, this law firm is 1,100 miles away in Florida. Could you remove this one? Thanks and Happy Mapping! |
64598750 by mapmaker1559 @ 2018-11-17 15:27 | 1 | 2018-11-22 02:40 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Map Maker 1559,Thanks for all the mapping! I noticed you are spelling out Maryland for addr:state. Addr:state is one of the very few things that OpenStreetMap-pers (see the Wiki on addr) have decided should be abbreviated, per USPS standards, so it should be addr:state=MD. I've fixed ... |
2 | 2018-11-22 17:00 | mapmaker1559 ♦14 | Hi RoadGeek_MD99, Sorry about the incorrect tagging! I'll remember this going forward and correct any I may come across.mapmaker1559 | |
63268871 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-10-07 01:18 | 1 | 2018-10-09 19:37 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Dartmouthmapmaker,FYI: I just fixed a node in the Trans Can Hwy, where your edit somehow threw the node about 30 kms southeast. (This one:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/452806403/history#map=11/46.2236/-67.3311). Not sure what JOSM was doing on that one. Thanks for the edits and Happ... |
62974365 by archivist @ 2018-09-27 11:29 | 1 | 2018-10-08 13:50 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Archivist,Thanks for the map edits! I noticed you are using addr:* tags on highways, like this street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6145033/history. Addr: tags are meant for points or buildings, not the highways or the parking lots. I can clean those up faster than iD, if you want me t... |
49597130 by PropertyVIEW® @ 2017-06-16 17:10 | 1 | 2018-08-12 16:42 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi PropertyVIEW®,Thanks for your hotel edits! However, this changeset needs to be reverted, as Tampa FL is several states away from Maryland. Also, it it OpenStreetMap practice to spell out the abbreviations in street names, so it should be West Cypress Street. If you want, I can fix this... |
2 | 2018-08-13 14:44 | PropertyVIEW® ♦6 | Interesting. This seems to have been a crossed wire or something. This is one of our hotels but it should not have been in Maryland. I'm not sure where that came from. We can fix it. | |
3 | 2018-08-13 16:55 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi PropertyVIEW®,I reverted your change on this hotel from today and last year, so that I could restore this hotel's tags, thus fixing the damaged bits. Also merged the adjacent Aloft hotel POI into the way, as the way was only tagged with building:levels and wouldn't render.RoadG... | |
4 | 2018-08-13 18:50 | PropertyVIEW® ♦6 | Thanks for the help. I just want to be sure we're on the same page. To clarify, the DoubleTree should not be there at all. I don't know how it did get there but that is a Tampa Florida hotel that does have a separate listing. This one should be deleted. This should just be the Aloft hotel.... | |
5 | 2018-08-13 19:04 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Thanks! I think we're on the same page. I only reviewed/fixed the two Maryland hotels: Element (was Doubletree Tampa Airport) and the adjacent Aloft. I deleted (reverted) your changes to the misplaced Doubletree, to restore the Element I had mapped 5 years ago. The Tampa Airport hotel in FL... | |
60353741 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2018-07-02 17:06 | 1 | 2018-07-17 19:12 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Worked in Texas and then back in Maryland (via survey), creating this super large "cafe". |
60153557 by catalinad_telenav @ 2018-06-25 14:42 | 1 | 2018-06-25 16:51 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Thank you Catalinad_Telenav. I am all for Telenav's review of construction roads (to see if they need to be opened), but *removing* a road without looking at the changeset comments (mine included field survey plus a link to an OpenStreetCam image) and/or asking the mapper does not seem right t... |
59599322 by catalinad_telenav @ 2018-06-06 11:33 | 1 | 2018-06-23 18:27 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Why did you delete this road? See http://openstreetcam.org/details/1181037/1584/track-info for my pic of this construction. Please revert this changeset. Thank you. |
2 | 2018-06-25 14:46 | catalinad_telenav ♦5 | I deleted the way as I could not see it on any of the satellite images. Now I reverted the changeset. Thank you for your help. | |
59978777 by Sina Dabiri @ 2018-06-19 13:08 | 1 | 2018-06-19 16:25 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Sina Dabiri,Welcome to OpenStreetMap! The Baltimore OSM community can always use another area mapper.I noticed you added names to the exit ramps. Please note that the tagging of things can be rather complicated. If you scroll toward the bottom of the "Edit Feature", and click... |
59312127 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2018-05-27 12:02 | 1 | 2018-05-27 15:45 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Additional source: TIGER 2017 tiles |
54394198 by Specialisterne Austria @ 2017-12-06 08:57 | 1 | 2018-03-19 10:47 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Specialisterne Austria,I noticed you created this point:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5267642121, which isn't in Austria. Could you fix it? Thank you and Happy Mapping!RoadGeek_MD99 |
2 | 2018-03-22 15:34 | Specialisterne Austria ♦1 | Hi RoadGeek_MD99,Thanks for letting us know. I just deleted the pin :) | |
3 | 2018-03-23 06:43 | freebeer ♦1,598 | Unf0rtunately, the BIPA in picturesque Sankt Ge0rgen is still t0 be found in a library building in Maryland, n0where near Gustav Klimt's summer lake... | |
4 | 2018-03-24 03:38 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Thanks freebeer! I've deleted the Austrian chemist POI found in Maryland, USA. | |
5 | 2018-03-27 09:49 | freebeer ♦1,598 | Just out of idle interest, I searched for the BIPA in Sankt Georgen, finding nothing.Apparently the usual wheelmap.org bug with POIs nowhere near their correct location.There is no POI for BIPA at the deleted node's address.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162280670#map=19/47.93430/13.48... | |
50069137 by JRyanCFW @ 2017-07-05 21:26 | 1 | 2018-02-14 23:49 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi J Ryan,I'm using OpenStreetCam images (like http://internal.openstreetcam.org/details/123799/4965 from Apr 21, 2017) to add details along TX 114 and I noticed you added a speed limit of 60 mph to this road:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367885691/history. The OSC images I'm usin... |
55500670 by erantr1 @ 2018-01-16 17:57 | 1 | 2018-01-20 15:53 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi erantr1,Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I've noticed that you have changed street names to the abbreviated form. It was 16th Street Northwest but you changed it to 16th St NW. Please do not shorten the long street names. The wiki says: "If the name can be spelled witho... |
2 | 2018-01-21 08:48 | erantr1 ♦23 | Hey,yes, my colleague already told me I shouldn't do it. Sorry about that.Thanks for commenting!Eran. | |
3 | 2018-03-29 18:19 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hello Eran,Can you tell us who you are working for? The "my colleague" comment above suggests that you might be working for someone.Best Regards,Andy | |
4 | 2018-05-06 08:47 | erantr1 ♦23 | Hi Andy,I answered you in a private message.Thanks,Eran. | |
5 | 2018-05-06 09:19 | SomeoneElse ♦13,390 | Hi Eran,I'd suggest that you add details of who you're working for to your OSM profile (your PM to me says that you are working for someone but doesn't say who). Currently there's no information on your OSM profile at all. To pick an example of how other comapnies tend to d... | |
6 | 2018-05-07 10:46 | erantr1 ♦23 | thanks for the suggestion, Andy. We will consider it. | |
54792419 by Memoire @ 2017-12-20 17:03 | 1 | 2017-12-24 02:09 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Memoire,I noticed you added a bridge along South Goshawk Trail from Bing imagery for new TX construction. That road was a temp construction road and has now moved to the north. Please check out Texas Orthophoto, as the Orthophotos may be newer than some of the Bing imagery. Thanks and Ha... |
54555432 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2017-12-12 03:24 | 1 | 2017-12-13 14:04 | highflyer74 ♦2,447 | Hi there!Could you please check this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93111427? There is some strange tagging on it...Thanks! |
2 | 2017-12-13 14:38 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Highflyer74,Thanks for catching this! I fixed my error.RoadGeek_MD99 | |
54183811 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2017-11-29 17:31 | 1 | 2017-11-29 19:03 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Forgot to close changeset: See last changeset for Maryland portion's comment. |
53366541 by saikabhi @ 2017-10-30 12:34 | 1 | 2017-11-03 12:12 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Saikabhi, I noticed on your oneway fix of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383087783 that you used oneway=1, which is a discouraged alternative to "yes". It is also rare, as "1" gets 0.04% versus 76.8% for "yes", according to Taginfo. Please consider using standa... |
2 | 2017-11-03 12:32 | saikabhi ♦159 | Hi Roadgeek_MD99,Thank you for pointing this out. I think I used it mistakenly when editing this road. Changing it to `oneway=yes`.CheersAbhishek | |
52400971 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2017-09-27 01:24 | 1 | 2017-09-29 15:51 | Harald Hartmann ♦827 | Hello RoadGeek_MD99. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527989952 you have tagged `constuction` instead of `construction`, right? #typo |
2 | 2017-09-29 16:06 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hello Harald Hartmann,Yes, #typo and fixed. Thanks! | |
46898457 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2017-03-16 13:31 | 1 | 2017-03-17 16:25 | RichRico ♦81 | Thanks for contributing with OSM.Could you share the image source you used to make this edition? |
2 | 2017-03-17 16:48 | RoadGeek_MD99 | I'm a local. Field survey: drove with OpenStreetCam running. See also Mapillary. Will try to GPS next week. | |
43813086 by mapmaker1559 @ 2016-11-20 01:05 | 1 | 2016-12-07 02:53 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Hi Mapmaker1559, while doing some QC, I noticed you had tagged a street with highway=residential_link. The wiki only goes down to tertiary_link and mapnik doesn't render, so I changed it to residential. Thanks! RoadGeek_MD99 |
40040202 by piligab @ 2016-06-15 14:41 | 1 | 2016-10-17 18:45 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Piligab: Noticed you had added node 4244431268 to Montgomery Road/MD 103 and accidentally added it to US 29/Columbia Pike. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4244431268). Please watch when adding a new node that you don't connect a bridge (tunnel) to another road at a different layer. I... |
2 | 2016-10-26 15:09 | piligab ♦60 | Hi RoadGeek_MD99,Thank you for notifying me about this error. This must have happened when I was splitting the Montgomery Road to add turn lanes. I will make sure to check for such errors before uploading. Thanks! | |
41775223 by bogdan_andrei @ 2016-08-29 11:23 | 1 | 2016-09-08 16:16 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Based on Bing image, I don't think this is one-way, as the yellow stripe and the turn channel to 44 Business show two-way travel. |
2 | 2016-09-09 05:32 | bogdan_andrei ♦5 | Do you refer to Canal Street(way: 159118954) ? | |
3 | 2016-09-09 11:29 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Sorry, yes, way/159118954 | |
4 | 2016-09-09 12:11 | bogdan_andrei ♦5 | For adding one way i used ImproveOSM with TrafficFlowDirection function, and from 810 trips, 100% of the drivers go in that direction. The yellow strip is to separate the drivers who come from Lytle Avenue and those who come from Canal Street in south direction. I think this is the right solution. I... | |
5 | 2016-09-09 12:37 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Thanks for the reply. I believe way/206465488 would have no purpose if way/159118954 was one-way (one-way now removed). I have seen a small number of the 100% ImproveOSM trips where the opposite direction had a very clear yellow line and a stop line at the intersection for 2 way travel. The yello... | |
39687683 by Selwyn Orren @ 2016-05-31 12:28 | 1 | 2016-06-29 19:56 | Jean Passepartout ♦20 | I noticed that Hippo Ave is now named Linuxweb. I think you want to add a node or a way for the building footprint and not "give" the street to Linuxweb. Thank you. |
2 | 2016-06-29 22:07 | Selwyn Orren ♦1 | Hello,You are 100% correct. I am not sure how I did that. The street is indeed Hippo Ave, I tried to add my company as a location in Hippo Ave. I honestly do not even recall how this was done in the first place. How do I change it back? | |
3 | 2016-06-30 00:31 | RoadGeek_MD99 | Selwyn, I see you figured out how to fix the street name with ID and added your company point. I cleaned up the street attributes and moved the rest of the Linuxweb values onto your point. Thanks! | |
4 | 2016-06-30 06:12 | Selwyn Orren ♦1 | Thanks yes I was so embarrassed by what I had done, I had to just try and figure it out. Turns out far easier than I had anticipated.Thanks so much for all your help with the cleaning up. | |
39842092 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2016-06-06 16:20 | 1 | 2016-06-09 14:12 | jakepg1 ♦2 | Closed since Hurricane Sandy |
2 | 2016-06-09 14:37 | RoadGeek_MD99 | I don't understand what is closed. My changeset only has two items: a house number in New Brunswick and a street name in Maryland with nothing in New Jersey. Could you give more details? Thanks! | |
27020939 by prajakta panchal @ 2014-11-25 12:46 | 1 | 2016-01-20 00:45 | RoadGeek_MD99 | This node appears to be for India, not Virginia, USA. Can you move it? Thanks. |
32986318 by RoadGeek_MD99 @ 2015-07-30 16:52 | 1 | 2015-09-22 10:16 | ElliottPlack ♦926 | I think you inadvertently changed the name of the street to "C" :) |
2 | 2015-09-22 10:43 | RoadGeek_MD99 | fixed |