| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71643901 by Garrett2497 @ 2019-06-26 16:23 | 1 | 2019-08-26 04:22 | UAN51 ♦15 | Volunteer responding - do you have evidence to suggest that "Tucker Leadership Lab" exist as a park? It is not listed as a "park" on the William Jewell website. |
| 2 | 2019-08-26 22:58 | Garrett2497 | I will admit, this is somewhat of a gray area because, for all intents and purposes, it is a park. A public green space with a public playground/obstacle course as well as a private larger course that can be reserved. I felt is was the most accurate descriptor even though it is not technically liste... | |
| 3 | 2019-08-27 21:41 | UAN51 ♦15 | OSM Volunteer responding - After further review of the area, labeling the "Tucker Leadership Lab" as a park is NOT appropriate. Looking through their website further, it cost money to use the facility and must be reserved before use. This area is on private property or a property the city ... | |
| 55045770 by Garrett2497 @ 2017-12-30 21:48 | 1 | 2018-01-02 23:43 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,110 | Looks like a cycleway with visible lanes got retagged as a footway, which is not correct. |
| 2 | 2018-01-03 02:12 | Garrett2497 | I’m on mobile right now so can’t see for sure but it’s very possible I made a mistake. I visit the area semi regularly but am not confident that the changes were perfect. If you are more familiar with this area feel free to correct it. | |
| 3 | 2018-01-03 02:53 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,110 | I'll defer to your knowledge of Mitch Park, but I would appreciate another look since the aerials seem to suggest it is a cycleway. Generally speaking, footways would be narrower and built to accommodate pedestrians first and might not even allow bicycles. | |
| 4 | 2018-01-03 04:26 | Garrett2497 | From what I know, most of the park paths are for walking primarily and the markings were removed/faded to the point where I couldn’t see them. But I may switch it to a general path rather than specify because I am not 100% sure. | |
| 47850753 by Garrett2497 @ 2017-04-16 22:33 | 1 | 2017-04-17 06:40 | DavidKewley ♦195 | This changeset deleted the outline of the Kanza Education and Science Park. Was that deliberate? If so, why? http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47850753 |
| 2 | 2017-04-18 14:43 | Garrett2497 | That was accidental. I hadn't even realized I had removed it until you mentioned it. | |
| 3 | 2017-04-18 15:39 | DavidKewley ♦195 | No problem, mistakes happen; I only asked because I noticed it. If you need help reverting or just undoing the delete of Kanza, I suggest you ask the Data Working Group for help -- data@osmfoundation.org. | |
| 4 | 2017-04-18 17:25 | Garrett2497 | Thanks I will do that when I get back on from my computer. |