xujiayi_1256 participated in the following changeset discussionsxujiayi_1256 participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64069586 by 云爱山 @ 2018-11-01 08:09 | 1 | 2019-02-25 09:22 | xujiayi_1256 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639927413这里有路？ |
| 33884665 by 云爱山 @ 2015-09-08 14:55 | 1 | 2019-02-25 09:18 | xujiayi_1256 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369692769请不要这样画线 |
| 63339774 by xujiayi_1256 @ 2018-10-09 10:08 | 1 | 2018-10-14 05:30 | aharvey ♦1,727 | Could you reference which dataset is being used for the names? There are many different datasets on services.land.vic.gov.au, eg. Vicmap Addresses or Vicmap Transport |
| 2 | 2018-10-14 05:42 | aharvey ♦1,727 | For https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/286898692 what's the reason for removing service=laneway? | |
| 3 | 2018-10-15 16:28 | xujiayi_1256 | Hi @aharvey, the dataset that we have been using is the Vicmap Transport that is on data.vic.gov.au. Should we go back and change the source tag to be more specific? The service=laneway tag was removed since it was caught by JOSM validation tool giving an error saying it's uncommon value and I ... | |
| 4 | 2018-10-15 23:41 | aharvey ♦1,727 | Yes I think it would be helpful to specify that this is Vicmap Transport specifically.Just because it's an uncommon value doesn't mean it should be removed, instead it's best to check with the mapper that added it originally with a changeset comment to see what their intention was... | |
| 63242073 by xujiayi_1256 @ 2018-10-05 20:12 | 1 | 2018-10-06 01:39 | aharvey ♦1,727 | See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roundabouts the accepted practice in Australia is to always draw out the roundabout in full. If you want to discuss this please open a discussion on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/ |
| 2 | 2018-10-06 01:55 | xujiayi_1256 | Thank you for the tip! I have reverted the changeset and please let me know if there's any other issues. | |
| 60386714 by xujiayi_1256 @ 2018-07-03 18:01 | 1 | 2018-09-24 04:59 | Warin61 ♦2,666 | Hi,The two ways marked Yundamindra - Linden Road and Mount Celia Road over lap each other. Only one way should be there as there is only one road. Please delete one of them where they overlap. |
| 2 | 2018-09-24 18:20 | xujiayi_1256 | Hi Warin61, thanks for pointing this out. I've corrected the overlapping ways and will keep it in mind for future projects. Please feel free to leave a comment if you see more of them and I will clean it up ASAP. Thanks! | |
| 57204557 by Shabby @ 2018-03-15 09:34 | 1 | 2018-06-01 21:32 | xujiayi_1256 | Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM! I see that you added this roundabout based on a custom imagery layer that looks like a future planning map. Are these features in this area still being proposed or they have been built? I'm trying to get some local knowledge on improving this area. Thanks ... |
| 56910428 by xujiayi_1256 @ 2018-03-05 17:38 | 1 | 2018-04-22 10:48 | joel7 ♦20 | Moggill Road Exit and Cedarleigh Road Exit. Make no sense given that they are sliproads that merge onto said road. Even if you did get it from the official government data. I'm going to take away the "Exit" since there is no sign saying this on the ground anyways. |
| 2 | 2018-04-23 17:35 | xujiayi_1256 | Hi @ClipArtJoel, thank you for pointing this out. I'm wondering if this is a common thing to look out for in government datasets? | |
| 57416357 by noa_m @ 2018-03-22 10:10 | 1 | 2018-03-28 23:26 | xujiayi_1256 | Please don't delete a road and create a new one when you edit something in order to preserve the history. Also, no abbreviation on road names please. |
| 2 | 2018-03-29 04:04 | aharvey ♦1,727 | no idea how that street turn into three, I've tried to clean it up while still keeping the original road for history, admittedly i split it up a fair bit to add turn lanes. @xujiayi_1256 sorry if some of your turn restrictions got lost, I tried to avoid but could you double check it looks okay ... | |
| 3 | 2018-03-29 17:54 | noa_m ♦2 | sorry for that, it was done by mistake, I will fix it xujiayi_1256 | |
| 4 | 2018-03-29 17:55 | noa_m ♦2 | @xujiayi_1256 |