| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 188507708 (Comments: 1) | Dnyaneshwarisolanke (Discussed changesets: 18) | Are these just copied and pasted? We have pretty good Bing imagery you don't seem to be using... commented 2026-09-04 06:33:19 UTC by Joel Koen ♦62 |
| 188468595 (Comments: 2) | Palitu (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Joel - I followed the tagging guidelines for Australian addr (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features#Addresses), i can see that there is conjecture whether addr:suburb should be included or not howeve... commented 2026-09-04 05:53:51 UTC by Palitu ♦1 |
| 188450881 (Comments: 2) | TheRattyGirl (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh thanks! That makes things a lot easier :) commented 2026-09-04 03:03:01 UTC by RatGirl ♦1 |
| 188449663 (Comments: 6) | AF NHVR (Discussed changesets: 3) | No worries thank you so much commented 2026-09-03 23:37:45 UTC by AF NHVR ♦1 |
| 173564153 (Comments: 2) | RahilPasha (Discussed changesets: 24) | Hi, I acknowledge and appreciate your feedback and the corrections. Thank you. I will take greater care to avoid these errors going forward. commented 2026-09-03 10:08:43 UTC by RahilPasha ♦21 |
| 188084530 (Comments: 1) | TheSwavu (Discussed changesets: 316) | Copilot said: Please keep the population value on node/13766899 as well. It does not cause any issues there, and it is helpful when we classify cities according to their importance. Other smaller cities also have population data attached to th... commented 2026-09-03 07:53:04 UTC by fukejs ♦29 |
| 188451816 (Comments: 2) | floogy (Discussed changesets: 1) | I remapped these and tagged as houses. This area already has the residential boundary mapped so there is no need to add those tags to the houses. The addr:state, postcode and suburb is optional and does not need to be mapped as these are already m... commented 2026-09-03 07:14:32 UTC by nevw ♦2,320 |
| 188449134 (Comments: 3) | Pheonix Karnasuta (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks! commented 2026-09-03 06:06:00 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188429353 (Comments: 1) | Pheonix Karnasuta (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451578 commented 2026-09-03 05:01:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188449576 (Comments: 2) | Pheonix Karnasuta (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - poor quality mapping https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451578 commented 2026-09-03 05:01:41 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188352605 (Comments: 1) | llemington (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello llemington, just letting you know that adding the postcode to a feature is optional in Australia as we have various postcode boundaries that will automatically fill these in. You don't need to specify them in Every Door. commented 2026-09-03 01:16:38 UTC by Joel Koen ♦62 |
| 150013617 (Comments: 3) | bruceas (Discussed changesets: 5) | This location is in Australia - so I guess the "u" wins. :) And from my recollection when I was there a couple of years ago - there was ... "a decorative wooden/metal archway used to ... create a welcoming entrance or passageway&quo... commented 2026-09-03 01:01:44 UTC by bruceas ♦4 |
| 87163282 (Comments: 1) | ChrisB999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/819301634/history has building = arbour that was added in this edit What was meant by building=arbour ? commented 2026-09-02 13:29:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188397531 (Comments: 1) | huntsman2832 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Streets don’t have addr tags. There is no need to add oneway=no as that is the default without the tag. Addr:state, suburb and postcode are not need in AU as these are already mapped by area. commented 2026-09-02 05:31:14 UTC by nevw ♦2,320 |
| 178046709 (Comments: 5) | ❤️🔥 (Discussed changesets: 148) | Thanks for those examples. That's why I didn't just change it. My main issue is I feel the expressway tag gives the impression the road is of a much higher standard than reality, especially when it comes up on a navigation app. I'll wo... commented 2026-09-01 03:10:50 UTC by Mappo99 ♦5 |
| 188287896 (Comments: 1) | Solaris07 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I swear I was about to get around to it : D commented 2026-08-31 10:41:09 UTC by SPLATPLAYS ♦8 |
| 188127806 (Comments: 1) | Try harder (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OSM! I'm just writing this to let you know that we map roads at the centreline (rather than at the border). Kind regards, Solaris commented 2026-08-31 06:53:25 UTC by Solaris07 ♦25 |
| 188283399 (Comments: 1) | SiljeKS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OSM! I'm just letting you know that you don't need to make a separate changeset for every building you edit. Doing this clogs up the area's history. Kind regards, Solaris commented 2026-08-31 05:01:22 UTC by Solaris07 ♦25 |
| 188137800 (Comments: 3) | George-jetson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Could be Axion? commented 2026-08-31 01:17:55 UTC by George-jetson ♦1 |
| 188234437 (Comments: 1) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 99) | Not enough room to say this is in regard to Note 5480263 by Oysterbay who stated Green Point road north of the roundabout was private access. No Mapillary or Bing to confirm commented 2026-08-30 09:02:34 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦512 |
| 186216539 (Comments: 2) | Ewen Hill (Discussed changesets: 99) | Thanks @alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-30 04:08:15 UTC by Ewen Hill ♦512 |
| 188225229 (Comments: 1) | zmcaleer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello zmcaleer, the work you're doing looks pretty cool - was just wondering if there's a meaning behind the R1 and R2 name you've put on the edge of the garden beds here? Also, the QLD Imagery layer in Background settings is m... commented 2026-08-30 02:53:46 UTC by Joel Koen ♦62 |
| 186790151 (Comments: 3) | craigray59 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Okay understood. The service roads do appear on all the available overhead imagery in id, but I guess it has all changed since. Cheers/Thanks. commented 2026-08-29 10:51:16 UTC by bob3bob3 ♦63 |
| 188035190 (Comments: 1) | Supt_of_Printing (Discussed changesets: 103) | Hello! area=yes is generally implied, and is not needed on four_square courts or on parking commented 2026-08-29 08:40:17 UTC by Ethan Grobin ♦15 |
| 188173933 (Comments: 2) | lephan (Discussed changesets: 7) | a node was deleted. nodes can be attached to more the one entity (line, polygon). should the node be deleted (accidentally), it destroys all the items that are attached to it. As sewerage line extending many kms is broken. accidental deletion of the ... commented 2026-08-29 06:27:43 UTC by lephan ♦4 |
| 188172662 (Comments: 4) | lephan (Discussed changesets: 7) | nothing further needs to be done here. commented 2026-08-29 01:24:54 UTC by lephan ♦4 |