| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 188537351 (Comments: 2) | YvesB (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for your comments, but are you sure about this ? The canal areas I have tagged were precisely the only one not having water:canal on the enclosing area. The linear features have the tag waterway:canal (and not water:canal). But you are much... commented 2026-09-04 19:29:05 UTC by YvesB ♦2 |
| 188540117 (Comments: 2) | YvesB (Discussed changesets: 2) | thanks for your explanations. Sorry, it was not vandalism. It is my first edits... I'll read your document osm-addresses.pdf. Looks very interesting. commented 2026-09-04 19:22:39 UTC by YvesB ♦2 |
| 187377369 (Comments: 3) | FrankBroux (Discussed changesets: 1) | wat je had verwijderd was iets over het landgebruik, niet een eigenschap van dat gedeelte meerstraat. let er gewoon in het vervolg op commented 2026-09-04 17:53:50 UTC by Joske1020 ♦53 |
| 158531284 (Comments: 3) | Tom Ameye (Discussed changesets: 117) | best laag natuurbeheerplannen gebruiken op geopunt. commented 2026-09-04 17:51:00 UTC by Joske1020 ♦53 |
| 188468406 (Comments: 1) | brunnerd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1547424784. amenity=parking_space should not be used on its own. It should be inside amenity=parking. P.S. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390230054 is a bit of an out-layer. It would be better ... commented 2026-09-04 10:09:30 UTC by Kees 59 ♦117 |
| 188472288 (Comments: 1) | kigpo (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Thanks for your edit. Unfortunately, you merely added a name to an existing building. This is not a correct way to edit OpenStreetMap. Adding a name to a building is only if the building itself has a name (very few buildings do) and if... commented 2026-09-03 16:22:49 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 188471491 (Comments: 1) | Arnaud Vanroose (Discussed changesets: 15) | ## REVERTED CHANGESET Again, please do not duplicate information. The address (street name + house number) is already on the map, in this case on the container building. Duplicating an identical address to the restaurant itself is not ... commented 2026-09-03 14:06:04 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 188470636 (Comments: 1) | Arnaud Vanroose (Discussed changesets: 15) | Hello, I regret to tell you that we’ll have to reject your edit again. A node with all the relevant information has been on the map since 2024. On OpenStreetMap, information must only be written once. Duplicating all... commented 2026-09-03 14:03:52 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 155200624 (Comments: 2) | OSMDoudou (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello, Thanks for reaching out. Given the small size and monochromatic icon, I can't think of something better. Had there been multiple colors, the icon could have displayed red hotspots on white bones (e.g. white hand or foot skeleton with join... commented 2026-09-03 13:39:19 UTC by OSMDoudou ♦21 |
| 188444976 (Comments: 1) | Djdunord993 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello "Brussels environnement" is an invented name. Make sure to always use the official name. This keep the OSM database consistent, we need this to query all the objects run by the same operator. The name used everywhere on... commented 2026-09-03 00:09:57 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 188445457 (Comments: 1) | Djdunord993 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM. Attention : sur OpenStreetMap les tags sont toujours en anglais, pas en français. Mercredi se dit Wednesday → "We" dans les opening hours. Ne pas ajouter des doublons d'adr... commented 2026-09-02 23:56:13 UTC by bxl-forever ♦3,058 |
| 186075853 (Comments: 2) | Waaslander (Discussed changesets: 57) | Ik heb het rudimentair gereconstrueerd aan de hand van een MER kaartbijlage commented 2026-09-02 17:18:37 UTC by Waaslander ♦66 |
| 186664090 (Comments: 8) | Kamerijker (Discussed changesets: 9) | Je hebt misschien wel een punt. Als je hier door de geschiedenis https://historical.osm.be/#14/50.7057/4.3029/MostrecentNGIBasemap-OpenStreetMapRoads rolt, dan zie je inderdaad eerste Bois de Hal veel meer richting zuid-oost van het bos. Later schuif... commented 2026-09-02 11:44:22 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187590069 (Comments: 1) | Oli vdB B-Fr (Discussed changesets: 2) | Bonjour! Je me suis permis de corriger votre ajout sur un cabinet de kiné à Rochefort. En effet, vous aviez uniquement mis le nom du cabinet sur le batiment, sans ajouter le tag qui renseigne que c'est un cabinet de kin&eacu... commented 2026-09-02 07:10:55 UTC by juminet ♦110 |
| 188348840 (Comments: 6) | Coucou Germaine (Discussed changesets: 1) | Cool, thanks a lot. And my apologies for the inconvenience commented 2026-09-01 16:54:51 UTC by Coucou Germaine ♦1 |
| 187899322 (Comments: 1) | mitchi (Discussed changesets: 2) | On essaye toujours d'eviter de dupliquer l'information. Dans ce cas, j'ai fais un seule site de sport (avec nom, dans le futur peut etre encore des autres infos) et j'ai supprimé les noms des terrains de jeu eu meme. commented 2026-09-01 14:21:25 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187326292 (Comments: 1) | putman122 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Je hebt hier de manage toegevoegd https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14089272642 die reeds bestond https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269142962. Ik heb je dubbel weer verwijderd. commented 2026-09-01 14:12:33 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187683900 (Comments: 1) | Hansiepanzie (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Hansiepanzie, Don't forget to add your source for edits commented 2026-09-01 12:52:30 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187001580 (Comments: 1) | 225kV (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for these additions. As underground cables are not visible from imagery nor easily in the field, please state your sources! commented 2026-09-01 12:50:17 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187758525 (Comments: 1) | Kugelbaum (Discussed changesets: 8) | Based on the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577091141, I'd say it's a building=church but not an amenity=church. I'll change it, let me know if you think I'm wrong commented 2026-09-01 12:38:28 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187788005 (Comments: 1) | Oli vdB B-Fr (Discussed changesets: 2) | S'il y a deja un polygone pour un objet, c'est certainment pas necessaire de le dupliquer avec un point! Je supprime. La Maison du Lac a l'air d'etre une maison de vacance, je change le type d'objet commented 2026-09-01 10:40:30 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187678214 (Comments: 1) | Ty_XLV1K (Discussed changesets: 1) | This hospital already exists: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944752309 I'll delete your version commented 2026-09-01 10:27:46 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187372130 (Comments: 1) | plicploc (Discussed changesets: 4) | Je m'imagine que StreetComplete ne te dis grand chose sur les objets que tu as edité ici - mais amenity=hospital n'est surement pas correct pour un maison médicale! Je corrige. commented 2026-09-01 10:13:51 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 187757100 (Comments: 1) | fredlenoir (Discussed changesets: 17) | Pourtant, la policlinique a besoin d'un tag amenity=clinic. Je l'ajoute! commented 2026-09-01 10:10:49 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188350753 (Comments: 1) | borishag (Discussed changesets: 50) | Hello, You (again) duplicated existing address in Belgium, actual concensus is not to do that. In this precise case , the address of the store is incorrect : Housenumber 100 is not on this building it's on another side of the road ... commented 2026-09-01 09:01:50 UTC by RaphaelPasloin ♦143 |
| 187172418 (Comments: 3) | Aurelien1685 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for your quick response. Guido commented 2026-09-01 05:06:23 UTC by gscholz ♦2,960 |
| 188337669 (Comments: 1) | ndf_maypole (Discussed changesets: 9) | *part ii commented 2026-09-01 01:20:43 UTC by ndf_maypole ♦17 |
| 184232047 (Comments: 2) | HenriqueCT (Discussed changesets: 16) | Oké het is geen Nederland, maar het klopte toch niet. Uit Mapillary-beelden blijkt dat de winkel Louis Delhaize heet en de beheerder EG Group is. commented 2026-08-31 18:55:13 UTC by A67-A67 ♦1,194 |
| 188118330 (Comments: 3) | BartHanssens (Discussed changesets: 7) | Inderdaad, die "aan een muur" functie is specifiek om je punt te plakken aan de outline van een reeds bestaand gebouw. Moest de binnenkant van het ziekenhuis gemapped zijn, zou het misschien wel correct gewerkt hebben commented 2026-08-31 13:44:34 UTC by joost schouppe ♦1,553 |
| 188266219 (Comments: 2) | Jakka (Discussed changesets: 250) | It’s quite possible that this might not have been necessary. But you haven undermined someone's efforts, whether intentionally or unintentionally. With this large changeset, you can be sure that you haven’t affected anything else, as... commented 2026-08-31 07:01:44 UTC by Jakka ♦1,878 |
| 188201915 (Comments: 3) | ndf_maypole (Discussed changesets: 9) | Bonsoir, Effectivement... Je n'étais pas remonté si loin. Merci à vous en tout cas. Il serait temps que le spw mette à jour les orthophotos 😅 Jim commented 2026-08-30 21:26:29 UTC by SFGJimStreet ♦16 |
| 188043869 (Comments: 2) | tracestrack-edits (Discussed changesets: 4) | Bonjour ! Je n'ai rien supprimé. Il s'agit uniquement d'ajouter une relation. Je vois qu'elle a été mise à jour par quelqu'un d'autre : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21284095. Pourrie... commented 2026-08-30 19:27:19 UTC by tracestrack-edits ♦4 |
| 187922850 (Comments: 1) | Bastinax (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Bastinax,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:37:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188219698 (Comments: 2) | tracestrack-edits (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks. Will do in following changes. commented 2026-08-29 22:16:54 UTC by tracestrack-edits ♦4 |