| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 175597389 (Comments: 1) | Trevor_1 (Discussed changesets: 185) | Hi! Thanks for the update. However, why merge the dual carriageways at intersection? Is it standard? Can you point to the wiki explaining we should do that? It adds transitions where there are none. commented 2025-12-07 10:46:10 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦449 |
| 175598074 (Comments: 1) | map_improver_xyz (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello, my changes (work of more than an hour) from just before got lost. I assume they are in the previous version. How can I reverse this here? commented 2025-12-06 19:20:50 UTC by map_improver_xyz ♦5 |
| 141001003 (Comments: 1) | skfd (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11177573877/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:19:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 133060280 (Comments: 1) | ti-lo (Discussed changesets: 869) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5150402677/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with cha... commented 2025-12-05 21:12:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 175462379 (Comments: 4) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi there, I fixed Allen Road according to what the City of Toronto said. I contacted Toronto 311 and was told that it should be classified as a Primary road and not a motorway, as it is not a highway at all and is classified as a municipal major road... commented 2025-12-05 20:00:02 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 164918453 (Comments: 1) | DENelson83 (Discussed changesets: 54) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671676471/history has shop = fruit that was added in this edit shop=fruit ? Maybe shop=greengrocer was intended? If they truly sell solely only fruit then maybe extra tag like greengrocer=fruit would be bet... commented 2025-12-05 08:11:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 170808600 (Comments: 3) | EPMPaul (Discussed changesets: 1) | glad to hear that this was useful! commented 2025-12-05 08:08:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 175500459 (Comments: 1) | ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist (Discussed changesets: 6) | Before anybody comments, this bus route is PUBLICLY operated by the Municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc and the Cities of Sarnia & London. I am NOT making any privately operated bus routes in this map (eg: Megabus, Flixbus) as it ruins the ... commented 2025-12-04 15:25:09 UTC by ThatOneFilipinoExtremeist ♦12 |
| 175425092 (Comments: 5) | MoG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, this seems to have worked as intended. commented 2025-12-04 15:01:03 UTC by mueschel ♦6,746 |
| 175449372 (Comments: 1) | regulardoors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! I removed the oneway tag because it is permitted to u-turn from atwater going south to atwater going north. There is no sign prohibiting it, so we must keep the segment two-way. Thanks and have a nice day! commented 2025-12-04 13:38:06 UTC by ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy ♦449 |
| 175381776 (Comments: 5) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thanks for the clarification! : ) commented 2025-12-04 12:53:10 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 175462463 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 3) | Again, your comment is false. You changed the type and access of roads only. commented 2025-12-04 12:14:48 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175461442 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 3) | You didn't even divide any streets in this changeset. The only change you made was to the access of a road. So your summary comment is completely false! Please do not do that! commented 2025-12-04 12:14:00 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175458122 (Comments: 1) | MatiasSpare (Discussed changesets: 3) | Your changeset message is false: you changed some roads from service roads to residential roads. commented 2025-12-04 12:08:45 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175468484 (Comments: 4) | Alejandra_Sterling (Discussed changesets: 2) | This changeset also split ways that are administrative boundaries and sidewalks, what is even the point of doing that? commented 2025-12-04 03:05:19 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175420545 (Comments: 2) | DuckMan2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome DuckMan2! Just another minor thing: you missed the + at the start of the phone number for Little Ceasars. You did it correctly for 13th Floor Cannabis, so it was obviously just a minor oversight. Thanks for the great contribution, and k... commented 2025-12-03 23:05:15 UTC by Adam Dunn ♦22 |
| 175376622 (Comments: 2) | MoG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrigé commented 2025-12-03 16:17:34 UTC by MoG ♦2 |
| 175414695 (Comments: 1) | fudoreaper (Discussed changesets: 6) | The ESRI imagery seems to have the new updates if you don't zoom in too far, that was enough for me to do some improvements. Take a look and see what you think. commented 2025-12-03 15:19:54 UTC by Roydon Olive ♦58 |
| 175384354 (Comments: 1) | fuzzyorange (Discussed changesets: 1) | Ha, I drove past and noticed the "Puffin Palace" vape shop this morning, and was going to add it, but you beat me to the punch! :P commented 2025-12-02 19:23:42 UTC by hoserab ♦212 |
| 144735760 (Comments: 2) | joel56dt (Discussed changesets: 21) | Fixed, thanks. commented 2025-12-02 17:44:16 UTC by joel56dt ♦187 |
| 156159223 (Comments: 2) | eerib (Discussed changesets: 62) | Just a typo. Fixed in latest CS. Thank you! commented 2025-12-02 17:40:22 UTC by eerib ♦213 |
| 175407718 (Comments: 1) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | this chnageset should not be so big, i only changed the river at the top a little bit commented 2025-12-02 15:22:57 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 169581998 (Comments: 1) | Stephen Hinde (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! You used surface=paved---- on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256257165/history Have you maybe meant surface=paved ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some o... commented 2025-12-02 10:26:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |
| 156203490 (Comments: 2) | mtmail (Discussed changesets: 51) | That was added in the previous changeset. My changeset only fixed the typo in the tag name. I see you already opened a discussion in the previous changeset, too. commented 2025-12-02 10:10:36 UTC by mtmail ♦161 |
| 159217987 (Comments: 2) | dalmond (Discussed changesets: 7) | You are correct this is a typo on my part. I have fixed it properly to culvert commented 2025-12-02 04:10:30 UTC by dalmond ♦6 |
| 175374662 (Comments: 2) | 349179440 (Discussed changesets: 9) | I understand, I will provide better mapping next time. commented 2025-12-02 00:49:27 UTC by 349179440 ♦7 |
| 174530307 (Comments: 4) | TagaSanPedroAko (Discussed changesets: 327) | Thanks for linking me to that conversation! I'm happy for us in Winnipeg to follow any agreed standard, but I want "the docs" to be updated as well to avoid... honestly to avoid this kind of bickering :P I agree that the name f... commented 2025-12-01 22:50:02 UTC by mf8s003j ♦25 |
| 172263252 (Comments: 1) | Dartmouthmapmaker (Discussed changesets: 144) | Very nice catch on the incorrectly named street! BTW: Is adding the postal code, town, and / or province to buildings really worth it? This can be found very easily with a spatial search ("building addr:housenumber=... addr:street=... IN ... commented 2025-11-30 16:31:08 UTC by aseigo ♦5 |
| 102359192 (Comments: 1) | Johnwhelan (Discussed changesets: 36) | would you be fine with lamp_type=led tagging? see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/poll-led-vs-led/138681/ commented 2025-11-30 14:04:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,774 |