| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 172014119 (Comments: 2) | Ruvimbo_29 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hie Gregory. I do not think the image is very clear . Thank you for the review. Will however work on that in future tasks commented 2025-09-18 06:33:40 UTC by Ruvimbo_29 ♦1 |
| 172086850 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Here is a good example of footprints that likely represent multiple buildings. It appears that the way the Eastern two were mapped previously was more accurate. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contrib... commented 2025-09-18 03:48:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172086495 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 8) | You did very well improving footpritns and deleting likely non-buildings. Some of the footprints you mapped are mapped as well as the imagery allows so I did not modify them during validation. --- On a few occasions you mapped some complex footprints... commented 2025-09-18 03:45:20 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172082128 (Comments: 1) | YokoP (Discussed changesets: 11) | The pentagonal footprint here is likely square and it just looks like it's not in the imagery becasue it was taken at an angle. I cross referenced mapbox and it looks square there. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Ty... commented 2025-09-18 03:25:19 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172081801 (Comments: 1) | YokoP (Discussed changesets: 11) | You improved the accuracy of some footprints here. Generally try to modify features instead of deleting and re mapping. In this case there's not much loss because there was not much history. Did you check it before making the deletions? ... commented 2025-09-18 03:20:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172081166 (Comments: 1) | YokoP (Discussed changesets: 11) | Buildings with silver/grey roofs tend to be square. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172081166 commented 2025-09-18 03:16:37 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172080592 (Comments: 1) | YokoP (Discussed changesets: 11) | It looks like you mapped some non-buildings here. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osm... commented 2025-09-18 03:15:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172039624 (Comments: 1) | Akanbi12 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, the footprint you mapped here represents a building and seems fairly well sized, but it should have been squared and contains an excess node. Use backspace to undo the placement of nodes. After tracing and tagging features which are likely... commented 2025-09-18 03:11:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172013207 (Comments: 1) | Ruvimbo_29 (Discussed changesets: 2) | All footpritns you mapped represent buildings but are oversized. Please do not include the shadow a building casts in its footprint. You appropriately mapped the western footprint as T shaped. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape ac... commented 2025-09-18 03:04:24 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172083770 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Good job modifying the existing data instead of deleting it; you improved basically all footprints here. The deletions you made were valid. The long T shaped footprint envelopes 2 buildings. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience ... commented 2025-09-17 22:00:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172063981 (Comments: 1) | Stella8020 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Stella, It looks like you're identifying buildings in imagery but not mapping them as accurately as they could be. It seems like you might be accidentally tagging them with "name=q" instead of squaring them with the shortcut... commented 2025-09-17 20:45:59 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172067496 (Comments: 1) | NRmapper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator. --- ... commented 2025-09-17 17:36:44 UTC by martien-176 ♦350 |
| 172053557 (Comments: 1) | NRmapper (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, you requested a review of your mappings. These buildings were probably deleted bc of buildings mapped on top of existing buildings. But please always leave a changeset comment (in addition to the already existing hashtag comment). ... commented 2025-09-17 09:59:10 UTC by martien-176 ♦350 |
| 172042855 (Comments: 2) | Ricken Lazlo Hale (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you - that's helpful advice. I had a tough time with this one. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172042855 commented 2025-09-17 06:35:43 UTC by Ricken Lazlo Hale ♦1 |
| 172042888 (Comments: 1) | Ricken Lazlo Hale (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, the footprint you mapped here represents a building and you followed the correct procedure to map it, but it's slightly oversized. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/172043726 When mapping buildings, please trace th... commented 2025-09-17 05:20:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172042585 (Comments: 1) | Enisa Nurkovic (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi Enisa, All these footpritns represent buildings, but could be more accurate. In short I recommend mapping the footprints of buildings with pitched roofs slightly smaller than the roof. See how I mapped them in https://osmcha.org/changesets... commented 2025-09-17 04:48:18 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172022406 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 7) | All footprints represent buildings; good job spotting them. Generally I recommend mapping footprints slightly smaller than the roof you see to account for overhang and any change in shape that occurs when squaring. --- #... commented 2025-09-17 04:19:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172021440 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Why did you delete the existing residential area here? --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172021440 commented 2025-09-17 04:10:49 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171986971 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, The vast majority of footprints represent buildings. Some footprints could be slightly shorter. Use the shadow to inform the size and shape of footprints you map. --- The arrow-head footprint is inaccurate, becasue you traced the roof instead of ... commented 2025-09-17 04:03:51 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171898656 (Comments: 3) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 7) | I forgive you😉 I've made mistakes when contributing and will continue to do so; it's impossible not to. I had a look at your more recent contributions and the building footprint accuracy is greatly improved; thank you very much fo... commented 2025-09-17 03:57:13 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172022840 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi, The building footprints you mapped here all represent buildings visible in imagery and are very accurate. You created some shared nodes with a river bank when adding them: hold alt in ID to prevent this. --- Please do not connect the corners of b... commented 2025-09-16 17:04:53 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 172013209 (Comments: 1) | Sara1981 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners and we need our mapping to reflect that. Ac... commented 2025-09-16 17:04:34 UTC by martien-176 ♦350 |
| 172024700 (Comments: 1) | Ale61906 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Most buildings do have right angled corners a... commented 2025-09-16 16:58:51 UTC by martien-176 ♦350 |
| 171801177 (Comments: 2) | NRmapper (Discussed changesets: 3) | These were intentional deletions. Another mapper seems to have used another imagery and entered numerous faulty buildings. commented 2025-09-15 11:25:13 UTC by NRmapper ♦1 |
| 171940435 (Comments: 1) | alicew02 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Alice, the vast majority of footprints here represent buildings, though most of the circular footprints actually represent vegetation i.e. bushes and trees, due to their colour. Zooming in and out tends to aid imagery interpretation. The NW... commented 2025-09-15 00:35:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171938673 (Comments: 1) | RedLily (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you mapped this footprint based on only one half of a pitched roof and did not appropriately square the footprint. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_... commented 2025-09-15 00:15:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171907379 (Comments: 1) | Arktorus (Discussed changesets: 14) | This is generally a high quality contribution. There are some minor inaccuracies here and there, but on the whole it looks like you took care to accurately map the buildings here. You updated the river to match the imagery. Please consider th... commented 2025-09-14 23:49:29 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171933904 (Comments: 1) | Oscar Felipe Hoyos Carvajal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you generally identified buildings visible in imagery and correctly tagged and squared the vast majority of them, however some are not as accurate as the imagery allows e.g. the footprints in the North, and a significant ammount share common node... commented 2025-09-14 23:03:51 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171936770 (Comments: 1) | tekvet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! The vast majority of footprints you mapped here represent buildings; I think that two do not. They could be more accurate, and all buildings I saw in the imagery likely had square footprints. Consider that you are looking at the roofs... commented 2025-09-14 21:25:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171935451 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 8) | All footprints you mapped here represent buildings. You improved the accuracy of an existing footprint; well done. When appropriate, please remember to square footprints after moving their nodes. Thank you for your contribution. Resolved by; C... commented 2025-09-14 20:48:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171934087 (Comments: 1) | kenVaiphei (Discussed changesets: 3) | Good job modifying the exisitng footprints here rather than deleting and remapping. You may want to map footprints slightly smaller than the roof you see to give yourself a buffer for the change in shape that occurs during squaring. Thank you for you... commented 2025-09-14 20:25:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171933687 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, you appropriately moved the highway to prevent data overlaps and make the relative position of features more accurate. The vast majority of footprints here represent individual footprints, but two in the South with complex shapes envelope... commented 2025-09-14 20:13:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171932949 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, this is overall a good cahngeset, but the arrow head shaped building in the NW is likely just a rectangular building and just looks that way becasue the imagery was taken at an angle. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical... commented 2025-09-14 19:52:16 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171931479 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, you are generally identifying buildings. A few of the buildings you mapped are almost as accurate as the imagery allows. Consider that you are looking at the roofs of buildings which likely overhang the walls somewhat. You created invalid shared ... commented 2025-09-14 19:40:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171930102 (Comments: 1) | Josh OB443 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Resolved by https://osmcha.org/changesets/171933411 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171930102 commented 2025-09-14 19:20:36 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171930543 (Comments: 3) | Josh OB443 (Discussed changesets: 3) | See how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171933411 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from o... commented 2025-09-14 19:19:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171929843 (Comments: 1) | Josh OB443 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, in a couple of places you created shared nodes between buildings that share nodes: hold alt to prevent the creation of shared nodes. Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or resident... commented 2025-09-14 19:05:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171751299 (Comments: 4) | Wilfried Jansky (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the eye-opening links. From now on I will write expressive descriptions. commented 2025-09-14 17:39:09 UTC by Wilfried Jansky ♦2 |
| 171900886 (Comments: 1) | KaiPankrath (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, the buildings you added here are generally valid but oversized. This led to issues where some footprints overlapped other unmapped buildings visible in the imagery. Unless you're sure that a building shares a wall with another it's best... commented 2025-09-14 06:25:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171901456 (Comments: 2) | Gregory Peony (Discussed changesets: 7) | Accidental comment on my own changeset. OSMCha failed to load the target changeset. commented 2025-09-14 06:24:23 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171898730 (Comments: 2) | manjita pandey (Discussed changesets: 5) | See how I mapped the footpritns here in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171900733 commented 2025-09-14 05:21:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171900402 (Comments: 1) | katya75 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you identified buildings in imagery but most footpritns you map are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in ... commented 2025-09-14 05:20:30 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171899921 (Comments: 1) | katya75 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, There's reason to believe that all footprints you've mapped here represent buildings, however they are generally oversized; please map the footprints slightly smaller than the pitched roofs you see in imagery. Thank you for your contrib... commented 2025-09-14 04:48:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171898499 (Comments: 1) | Vibhi356 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, when mapping square features please right click and select square, or press q after tagging to square the corners of features. I resolved this in Changeset: 171898709 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you... commented 2025-09-14 02:41:26 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171893514 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello, you have generally identified buildings in the imagery and mapped them quite accurately. They'd be even more accurate if you map the footprint slightly smaller than the roof you see. You created some invalid shared nodes between buildings... commented 2025-09-14 02:27:33 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171897448 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Welcome to OSM! The footprint you added here represents a building in the imagery, well spotted! I think this building is actually square becasue the shadow it casts is straight. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898153 I... commented 2025-09-14 01:49:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171897457 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 7) | Welcome to OSM! The footprint you added here represents a building in the imagery, well spotted! It is however oversized and should be squared. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898110 When mapping buildings, please trace... commented 2025-09-14 01:43:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171897086 (Comments: 1) | Vibhi356 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! All footprints you added here represent buildings in the imagery but they should be squared and sometimes you only used one half of the roof to map them. Condider the roof shape and how the scene is lit. See how I mapped the northern ... commented 2025-09-14 01:38:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171753166 (Comments: 1) | lilith hotaro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, all footprints you mapped here represent buildings in the imagery. They could be more accurate if you genearally mapped them smaller because pitched roofs tend to overhang building walls. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape acc... commented 2025-09-13 18:09:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171751064 (Comments: 1) | AnyaBond (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, every footprints you added here represents a building in the imagery but they could be more accurate and should have been squared. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population esti... commented 2025-09-13 18:00:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171751393 (Comments: 1) | AnyaBond (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the NE footprint envelopes multiple buildings. Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snap... commented 2025-09-13 17:57:52 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171751603 (Comments: 1) | AnyaBond (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Anya, Assuming you were asking if the western most footprint here represents a building my answer is that, yes, it does, and I think that all the footprints you added here represent buildings. It is obscured by vegetation, but there is evid... commented 2025-09-13 17:53:41 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦957 |
| 171853986 (Comments: 1) | Oscar Felipe Hoyos Carvajal (Discussed changesets: 2) | None of your mappings was squared: After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners. All your mappings were oversized. The humanitarian teams use the size of ... commented 2025-09-13 15:56:55 UTC by Kraan46 ♦24 |