| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 188451746 (Comments: 1) | Pete77754 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Por favor, ¿Podrías ser más concreto a la hora de describir tus cambios? Describir tu changeset como "Actualización de elementos" no aporta información útil sobre tus cambios. Adem&aac... commented 2026-09-04 20:32:14 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 188536947 (Comments: 1) | dcapillae (Discussed changesets: 123) | Corregido etiquetado wikipedia y wikidata. Véase discusión en conjunto de cambios nr. 188532470 commented 2026-09-04 17:28:46 UTC by dcapillae ♦455 |
| 188532470 (Comments: 1) | uma_caruma (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hola. La Avenida Obispo Ángel Herrera Oria y el obispo Ángel Herrera Oria no son la misma cosa. Cada uno tiene su propio código wikidata. Si lo que quiere es indicar la etimología del nombre de la avenida, us... commented 2026-09-04 17:24:05 UTC by dcapillae ♦455 |
| 188512038 (Comments: 4) | marcmarti (Discussed changesets: 12) | No estic d'acord en treure detalls, per a mi són voreres i per a la Guàrdia Urbana també, si no s'emeten més receptes és per acord entre alguns veïns i el districte, però com que només s... commented 2026-09-04 15:32:38 UTC by aTarom ♦981 |
| 187259318 (Comments: 4) | Arturo Francisco Barbero (Discussed changesets: 65) | Perfecto así lo añado aquí y en https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13134732429/ con características análogas. commented 2026-09-04 11:06:01 UTC by Arturo Francisco Barbero ♦69 |
| 187747544 (Comments: 2) | reileis (Discussed changesets: 1) | O tramo desde Oroso ata unha zona intermedia entre Busto e Berdía está completada e finalizada, por outra parte, desde a estación da Sionlla ata os dous túneles estaba en obras polo menos hai 1 mes máis ou menos, e ... commented 2026-09-03 21:20:50 UTC by reileis ♦1 |
| 171024821 (Comments: 1) | Ludwig Stein (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424987734/history has building = balcony that was added in this edit that should be building:part=balcony, right? Without building=balcony as surely it is not a separate building commented 2026-09-03 21:12:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188486711 (Comments: 1) | viver (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hola viver, Gracias de nuevo por tus aportaciones. En este caso, como puedes ver en la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Objetos_que_generan_dudas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#C), un centro de salud se etiqueta como amenity=clinic y no como hospi... commented 2026-09-03 19:46:52 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 172666845 (Comments: 1) | Ludwig Stein (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434399978/history that should be building:part=balcony, right? Without building=balcony as surely it is not a separate building commented 2026-09-03 16:18:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188458428 (Comments: 2) | marcmarti (Discussed changesets: 12) | Bon dia, buscant el nom no trobava resultats a internet així que el vaig treure. No sé si el nom és rellevant, etiquetaria l'edifici com a building=rectory o englobaria ela edificis dins dels terrenys de l'esglés... commented 2026-09-03 14:40:44 UTC by marcmarti ♦68 |
| 188458109 (Comments: 1) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hi rajdhani, Thanks for correcting possible tagging errors, but I don't understand why I am considered to have incorrectly removed the address of an item in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188389970 I unders... commented 2026-09-03 14:15:09 UTC by anglacesc ♦1 |
| 186285563 (Comments: 1) | Calasanz (Discussed changesets: 28) | És una piscina privada. commented 2026-09-03 13:22:57 UTC by rogerpueyo ♦6 |
| 181526048 (Comments: 8) | Claudius Henrichs (Discussed changesets: 182) | Any feedback on whether we can reach a tagging consensus here to prevent power plant duplication in the database? commented 2026-09-03 09:51:07 UTC by Claudius Henrichs ♦227 |
| 188389970 (Comments: 1) | anglacesc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188458109 commented 2026-09-03 08:20:59 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188065370 (Comments: 5) | ivanruiz (Discussed changesets: 14) | Em sembla bé, si ho pots corregir t'ho agraeixo. commented 2026-09-02 18:14:54 UTC by ivanruiz ♦14 |
| 188370274 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 315) | Highways -> Landuse commented 2026-09-02 13:14:27 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,090 |
| 188319545 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 315) | Highways -> Landuse commented 2026-09-02 13:13:55 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,090 |
| 188320585 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 315) | Highways -> Landuse commented 2026-09-02 13:13:36 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,090 |
| 188417961 (Comments: 1) | marczoutendijk (Discussed changesets: 315) | Highways -> landuse commented 2026-09-02 13:13:17 UTC by marczoutendijk ♦3,090 |
| 188361817 (Comments: 3) | Sonja Emilie (Discussed changesets: 6) | Yes, I understand, what I'm referring to is that if you are removing the segregated=yes tag, you could add another similar tag so that people and data consumers can distinguish that this is a true cycleway instead of a shared cycle and foot way.... commented 2026-09-02 12:47:14 UTC by marcmarti ♦68 |
| 188410693 (Comments: 4) | IagoGV (Discussed changesets: 2) | Feito! commented 2026-09-02 11:21:18 UTC by IagoGV ♦2 |
| 188196324 (Comments: 1) | R Bonilla (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola R Bonilla: los cementerios municipales no tienen adscripción religiosa, tal como recoge la ley de cementerios. https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-1978-27612 commented 2026-09-02 10:02:52 UTC by MarinoBM ♦181 |
| 188195802 (Comments: 1) | R Bonilla (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola R Bonilla: los cementerios municipales no tienen adscripción religiosa, tal como recoge la ley de cementerios. https://www.boe.es/diario_boe/txt.php?id=BOE-A-1978-27612 commented 2026-09-02 10:02:46 UTC by MarinoBM ♦181 |
| 70843889 (Comments: 2) | MapMakerGal (Discussed changesets: 31) | Só repliquei no seu momento (hai case unha década) o nome que puxeran os usuarios nun treito, para que teña sentido en toda a vía. A Veiga queda na fronteira Asturias-Galiza, chámase Vegadeo en español. commented 2026-09-02 07:49:19 UTC by MapMakerGal ♦128 |
| 187651982 (Comments: 1) | mp04 (Discussed changesets: 1) | El ancho ya está establecido, por lo que es responsabilidad de las aplicaciones de navegación aplicar restricciones. De todos modos, he cambiado la vía a "residential", por lo que tendrá menos prioridad que como ... commented 2026-09-01 21:51:06 UTC by Rodrigo Rega ♦372 |
| 188308145 (Comments: 1) | GGZALAM (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola GGZALAM: OpenStreetMap es un proyecto que hacemos entre todos. Mis ediciones se pueden mejorar, pero elemento que eliminas es elemento que se pierde. Espero que mejores los que has eliminado en esta edición. Un saludo. commented 2026-09-01 19:06:51 UTC by MarinoBM ♦181 |
| 185210799 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | Es inaceptable eliminar información más completa como los edificios con número de portal y volver a dibujar los edificios genéricos sin esa información. Deberían de revertirse todos estos cambios. commented 2026-09-01 17:50:29 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 185213272 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | En este changeset se han eliminado edificios con etiquetas específicas de apartamento con el número de portal y se han sustituido erróneamente por edificios genéricos building=yes y sin el número de portal. commented 2026-09-01 17:48:22 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 185333026 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | De este changeset se han modificado los leisure=park a "natural=grassland". commented 2026-09-01 17:45:57 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 186007049 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | Changeset revertido por errores en la creación de una relación multipolígono en la plaza: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/161 commented 2026-09-01 17:43:23 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 188154446 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | Changeset revertido por creación irreal de parques: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/161 commented 2026-09-01 17:43:03 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 185588869 (Comments: 1) | GulhMaster (Discussed changesets: 7) | Changeset revertido por creación irreal de parques: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/usuarios-editando-en-espana-bajo-sospecha-vandalismo-malas-practicas-y-otros/2510/161 commented 2026-09-01 17:42:57 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 188323248 (Comments: 2) | banderas191 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hola, si, los revisé el sábado pasado. Siempre actualizo analizando previamente el terreno, y en raras ocasiones cuando tengo muy claro un cambio. Este sendero/camino de paso es muy interesante para conectar el Torrent de Rocamora ... commented 2026-09-01 14:05:08 UTC by banderas191 ♦2 |
| 188352697 (Comments: 5) | rogerpueyo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Queda estrany però no tinc alternativa en ment, ho poso a https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/nuevas-etiquetas-que-aparecen-en-espana-bienvenido-mister-tag-bmt/98218/885 per si algú te millor tag. Gràcies per respondre, s... commented 2026-09-01 13:45:45 UTC by aTarom ♦981 |
| 188076600 (Comments: 5) | MappingMore (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Vijomar, No problem at all, and thank you for checking the street name again. I’m glad it is now correct. Thank you for your help and for contributing to the map. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-01 04:34:37 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 188253786 (Comments: 1) | Ignacio Lorenzo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188322483 commented 2026-08-31 18:39:03 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 187395469 (Comments: 5) | LiudmilaBareika (Discussed changesets: 6) | "Hola, Sanchi. Dado que ya había justificado mi edición con datos verificables y que la reversión parece incorrecta, voy a restaurar mi edición original. Si tienes alguna objeción concreta que contradiga mis fu... commented 2026-08-31 14:06:35 UTC by LiudmilaBareika ♦8 |
| 188142984 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188255808 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188088962 (Comments: 2) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188174151 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188156357 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188092535 (Comments: 1) | user352007 (Discussed changesets: 6) | DWG revert - apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188287874 commented 2026-08-31 06:58:21 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188264091 (Comments: 1) | Merceria Lenceria Susana (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is not allowed on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account; see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers for more infor... commented 2026-08-31 04:21:32 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 174242392 (Comments: 7) | uk1967 (Discussed changesets: 1) | So, habe alles gefixt, so gut es ging. CS #188268531 commented 2026-08-30 19:50:57 UTC by krza ♦32 |
| 184907594 (Comments: 1) | tomcat83 (Discussed changesets: 319) | Este changeset contiene errores graves como haber modificado el nombre de una calle urbana por el nombre genérico del catálogo oficial de carreteras. Este tipo de cambios se considera una mala práctica. Ejemplo: Calle de Don Pedr... commented 2026-08-30 11:26:40 UTC by Jordi MF ♦1,872 |
| 188016246 (Comments: 1) | Toxiiita (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Toxiiita,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:37:28 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 184689446 (Comments: 2) | Sébastien Pi (Discussed changesets: 27) | Salut, Non, ce sont des notes qui sont là principale source (en plus de jeter un œil aérien). Ici, c'est https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2926865 qui parlait d'un sentier plus difficile que sa note préc&e... commented 2026-08-29 07:37:39 UTC by Sébastien Pi ♦159 |