| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 3583981 (Comments: 1) | Michi (Discussed changesets: 18) | Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5214975 ? Is it existing or not? commented 2026-03-22 11:09:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,624 |
| 180232285 (Comments: 1) | MappingMore (Discussed changesets: 7) | @MappingMore Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180232285 would be v... commented 2026-03-22 06:59:38 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,076 |
| 179963600 (Comments: 3) | Journal Square (Discussed changesets: 1) | @MappingMore Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180232285 would... commented 2026-03-22 06:58:33 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,076 |
| 180227165 (Comments: 5) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 46) | The cables in Norway and other EU countries. It's getting crazy in South America because they are getting cars from all over the world (including China) and they now have charging stations with at least 4 different plugs. Take a look at this sta... commented 2026-03-22 06:49:51 UTC by TheNightRider ♦53 |
| 179830469 (Comments: 2) | Just Vanilla Bake Shop (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180234253 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-22 05:33:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179830680 (Comments: 2) | Luxury Ridess (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180234254 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-22 05:33:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179830391 (Comments: 2) | 15885420 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180234249 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-22 05:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179829700 (Comments: 2) | Dylan Hirsch-Shell (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179831145 commented 2026-03-22 05:33:11 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 179824357 (Comments: 2) | Cmccune (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179824644 commented 2026-03-22 05:33:08 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 180232727 (Comments: 1) | JamesonTC (Discussed changesets: 2) | What do you mean by "doesn't register as a POI"? Are you referring to a particular website or app? I'll remove the extra one you added and look into getting the original one tagged correctly. commented 2026-03-22 05:18:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 179374552 (Comments: 9) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 168) | You can add the noname=yes tag to avoid the validation error. commented 2026-03-22 04:48:43 UTC by compdude ♦173 |
| 180233268 (Comments: 1) | Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) (Discussed changesets: 1) | #UnmappedSmallTownUSA commented 2026-03-22 04:18:59 UTC by Preston Maness ☭ (aspensmonster) ♦1 |
| 173912155 (Comments: 3) | Sebasawk (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi pwbriggs, Thank you for reaching out. These edits were made as part of the United States – HOV Lanes to be Digitized Separately project (new geometry creation). I created separate HOV lane geometry in locations where there are double so... commented 2026-03-22 04:00:19 UTC by Sebasawk ♦18 |
| 179060952 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 168) | To connect the tertiary roads at either end of that very specific road segment. commented 2026-03-22 03:36:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦200 |
| 139013563 (Comments: 1) | jake-low (Discussed changesets: 7) | Do you happen to know if it's still open to people walking and biking? If so, I'd like to change it to highway=path. commented 2026-03-22 03:27:51 UTC by pesticides ♦37 |
| 177473349 (Comments: 18) | JeroenHoek (Discussed changesets: 98) | Yeah, I just mentioned memorial_name=* because it’s in use and matches federal terminology. I forgot that honorary_name=* is more common. But this would all need to be sorted out in a broader discussion, not here. commented 2026-03-22 02:34:04 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦604 |
| 180069274 (Comments: 2) | jhaluska80 (Discussed changesets: 28) | Thanks for noticing. I try to map to the best of my abilities. Hopefully it makes for a map people feel confident using and feel good contributing to. commented 2026-03-22 01:39:56 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦96 |
| 155556773 (Comments: 2) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 12) | Was trying to find the original way It was copied from when doing land coverage edits in the area. I also found it technically correct, but not a fan of how it was rendered in this use. I have removed the intermittent canal and renamed the grassland... commented 2026-03-22 01:23:12 UTC by j0hn33y ♦15 |
| 180231262 (Comments: 1) | jleedev (Discussed changesets: 23) | Revert of changeset/177083702 commented 2026-03-22 00:56:16 UTC by jleedev ♦303 |
| 177083702 (Comments: 2) | Snare King (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in changeset/180231262 commented 2026-03-22 00:56:05 UTC by jleedev ♦303 |
| 180230702 (Comments: 1) | ALTRIOSRailGuy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1072195562 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-22 00:20:25 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179266000 (Comments: 2) | kmenard (Discussed changesets: 2) | I have added the ref back as you have not responded with evidence that this is no longer a Florida state road and I my self (along with others I asked for help with this) could not find any such evidence. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-03-22 00:17:16 UTC by Udarian ♦677 |
| 180230412 (Comments: 1) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 79) | I already fixed the dragged node in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180224885 , that lead to this changeset disconnecting the road and rail lines from the level crossing vertex, I have fixed that in changeset https://www.openstreetm... commented 2026-03-22 00:14:41 UTC by Udarian ♦677 |
| 180220211 (Comments: 1) | StartChat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello welcome to OSM. This feature is not a public road, it is tagged as a private driveway. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground... commented 2026-03-22 00:05:14 UTC by MassCartog ♦335 |
| 180228610 (Comments: 1) | Brandomoney (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/110635845 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of ... commented 2026-03-21 23:59:04 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180223820 (Comments: 3) | MattMillerCR (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7165187797 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-21 23:58:56 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180228696 (Comments: 1) | mlysle (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10282580757 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-21 23:33:22 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179015806 (Comments: 1) | HoustonBikeGuide (Discussed changesets: 1) | This changeset moved the whole apartment complex way --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179015806 commented 2026-03-21 23:32:15 UTC by democat ♦26 |
| 180227998 (Comments: 2) | stillhart (Discussed changesets: 46) | Hey Udar, Frequency=0 is a wiki documented value for DC power. Tesla Superchargers are all DC EV fast chargers so 0 would apply and be valid. commented 2026-03-21 22:38:43 UTC by GA_Kevin ♦29 |
| 179360917 (Comments: 1) | Zol87 (Discussed changesets: 71) | i'm confused. aren't the shell chargers actually tesla chargers?? commented 2026-03-21 21:47:32 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 180079880 (Comments: 1) | ForestFurnace (Discussed changesets: 38) | Thanks, ForestFurnace! Appreciate your diligent work on the map in the Centre Region. commented 2026-03-21 21:06:58 UTC by mbeyerle ♦48 |
| 180184343 (Comments: 4) | MattMillerCR (Discussed changesets: 2) | also why did you remove the amenity, website and phone tags from way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295187753 as that website seems to still be up? Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-03-21 20:15:12 UTC by Udarian ♦677 |
| 180222880 (Comments: 1) | WaddleIsGood77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please let me know if I added this wrong. I put abandoned=yes so am pretty sure that is correct. commented 2026-03-21 19:29:53 UTC by WaddleIsGood77 ♦2 |
| 180183076 (Comments: 2) | WaddleIsGood77 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you! I’m new to OSM, have only made a couple edits but I’m traveling here and wanted to fix up the map a bit. Thanks for the tip! commented 2026-03-21 18:31:19 UTC by WaddleIsGood77 ♦2 |
| 180213553 (Comments: 2) | fowlerprecision3 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=* Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry. commented 2026-03-21 17:33:30 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180213410 (Comments: 2) | fowlerprecision3 (Discussed changesets: 4) | 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=* Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry. commented 2026-03-21 17:33:30 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179818607 (Comments: 2) | Damaris Royalty Realtor at Keller Williams Gulfport (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218650 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179801612 (Comments: 2) | itsystemsconsulting (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218641 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:16 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179794720 (Comments: 2) | Wendy Williams-Lacour: Allstate Insurance (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218636 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179791640 (Comments: 2) | selectautogreenville (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180218626 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 17:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 180181694 (Comments: 4) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 32) | Nevermind, I see that there are 916 or so. Removed. Hopefully solved commented 2026-03-21 17:30:48 UTC by I-76 ♦62 |
| 180210531 (Comments: 1) | Steven Splinter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7868937921, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7868937926 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move th... commented 2026-03-21 14:45:42 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180210091 (Comments: 1) | kiritimati_c7g (Discussed changesets: 6) | *fix traffic signals and cneter triskett rd commented 2026-03-21 14:20:45 UTC by kiritimati_c7g ♦6 |
| 175773922 (Comments: 1) | lapsly (Discussed changesets: 2) | Local knowledge here, this one is present on G Street view but it is not located here anymore. I suspect it is the one facing SSE down Mathis Rd, which is not visible on G Street view. commented 2026-03-21 11:10:24 UTC by Keith_Op ♦3 |
| 180168476 (Comments: 1) | M-NCPPC_Import (Discussed changesets: 29) | This import went wrong. All the objects contain many tags that shouldn't appear in OSM like "ROOF_TYPE". Height of buildings with nanometer precision are also pretty useless. This should be reverted and redone following all of the I... commented 2026-03-21 09:40:33 UTC by mueschel ♦7,001 |
| 180181997 (Comments: 1) | whammo (Discussed changesets: 74) | Hi, thanks for adding detail here, but you seem to have added several duplicate phone numbers that were already mapped using the contact: scheme e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10553314712 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266493096 ... commented 2026-03-21 08:54:25 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦364 |
| 177511938 (Comments: 7) | Ekaterina Nov G (Discussed changesets: 4) | The geometry is fixed but the hotel tags are back, you'll want to delete those commented 2026-03-21 08:11:04 UTC by tguen ♦107 |
| 179777748 (Comments: 2) | Nearest Green Distillery (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180188170 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-21 06:02:35 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179775094 (Comments: 2) | 500382522 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180188169 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-21 06:02:34 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 180173275 (Comments: 2) | 500376405 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-21 05:33:19 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180177954 (Comments: 2) | 500380450 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-21 05:33:19 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180170655 (Comments: 2) | 10006977 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-21 05:33:18 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179774958 (Comments: 2) | 500382315 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180187195 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-21 05:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179770024 (Comments: 2) | morpheonco (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180187194 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-21 05:33:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179768812 (Comments: 2) | 500385097 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180187189 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-21 05:33:02 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 180185314 (Comments: 1) | Ben Freeze (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-21 04:21:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180181037 (Comments: 1) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9680979424 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-20 23:13:36 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180181175 (Comments: 1) | Gaelan Steele (Discussed changesets: 1) | (er, chain) commented 2026-03-20 23:02:15 UTC by Gaelan Steele ♦1 |
| 180128752 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong weight restriction tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179857. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-20 22:07:27 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180127878 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong weight restriction tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179776. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-20 22:05:14 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180122357 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179725. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-20 22:02:37 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180122221 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180179583#map=19/42.262167/-71.463326. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-20 21:57:44 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180179079 (Comments: 1) | crushtheserpent (Discussed changesets: 16) | also added demolished:building tags where necessary commented 2026-03-20 21:38:14 UTC by crushtheserpent ♦20 |
| 180178979 (Comments: 1) | Standish Farm Supply (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 21:36:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180084405 (Comments: 1) | BeeBuzz01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi again :) the benches both look good --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180084405 commented 2026-03-20 21:29:04 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
| 180084468 (Comments: 1) | BeeBuzz01 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi there BeeBuzz01 :) thanks for taking the time to contribute to this project. You asked for a review of this changeset: - looks solid :) some things to change or consider: - capacity=* is currently only defined for numbe... commented 2026-03-20 21:28:25 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
| 179223012 (Comments: 2) | Openstreetmaplover2026 (Discussed changesets: 30) | Dear OpenStreetMapLover2026, please take note of the above comment. You have been active since, but you haven't fixed this issue yet! commented 2026-03-20 21:27:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,580 |
| 179972103 (Comments: 1) | UI Facilities Information (Discussed changesets: 2) | This hasn't pushed to google maps yet....must I do something to help push this? commented 2026-03-20 21:22:13 UTC by UI Facilities Information ♦1 |
| 180163494 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 9) | these are level updates from comaps commented 2026-03-20 20:47:37 UTC by synthfi ♦17 |
| 134038107 (Comments: 1) | yawfle (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10757201006/history has shop = equestrian that was added in this edit shop=equestrian ? Maybe shop=sports + sport=equestrian would work here equally well or better? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/... commented 2026-03-20 20:41:54 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,624 |
| 175939269 (Comments: 1) | KelsonV (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13376960525/history has shop = equestrian that was added in this edit shop=equestrian ? Maybe shop=sports + sport=equestrian would work here equally well or better? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/... commented 2026-03-20 20:41:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,624 |
| 180177049 (Comments: 1) | Earthworks Landscape Materials (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 20:36:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180176314 (Comments: 1) | 500387405 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 20:15:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180176000 (Comments: 1) | 500387266 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 20:03:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180175891 (Comments: 1) | 500381985 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 20:00:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180175806 (Comments: 1) | 500385827 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 19:57:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179236963 (Comments: 1) | Lenonn84 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your work! I've noticed you recently added some bike lanes that you mapped as bike paths. Please note that, for bike ways to be mapped as separate ways and tagged as cycle paths, they have to be not inherentl... commented 2026-03-20 19:24:59 UTC by chath_tsu ♦28 |
| 180145760 (Comments: 2) | Rambling Banjo (Discussed changesets: 2) | That makes sense. Now that I've looked into it, there is documentation on the wiki regarding this practice. I appreciate the feedback. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2026-03-20 19:21:57 UTC by Rambling Banjo ♦3 |
| 179418485 (Comments: 3) | 15334419 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Mhm commented 2026-03-20 18:21:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,076 |
| 179977923 (Comments: 1) | AngryPen (Discussed changesets: 3) | Angry! there were some hidden characters in the phone number, maybe from pasting? I've removed them. Thanks for the info, keep mapping! commented 2026-03-20 18:05:57 UTC by wireguy ♦559 |
| 177197789 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, it looks like your changes here have accidentally enlarged the building footprint to also encompass the parking area which doesn't match the latest imagery. I have gone ahead and updated the building to match the latest imagery. Please be... commented 2026-03-20 18:01:27 UTC by JessAk71 ♦125 |
| 180145858 (Comments: 1) | Brann Sullivan Trial Lawyers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Congratulations on your first OpenStreetMap edit! Here are some helpful tips for future additions to the map: 1. Phone number should be formatted in international format (starting with +1). 2. opening_hours has a specific syntax ... commented 2026-03-20 17:59:43 UTC by skquinn ♦812 |
| 173368565 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, it looks like you may have accidentally added a building tag to this area, the entire area is not a building so it should not have a building tag, instead it should have the poi type tag to represent the business such as a specific amenity. I ... commented 2026-03-20 17:56:07 UTC by JessAk71 ♦125 |
| 180170845 (Comments: 1) | Madres Modern Mexican (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180164860 (Comments: 2) | 15334419 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 17:33:24 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180161046 (Comments: 2) | Cornerstone Flooring LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 17:33:23 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179768647 (Comments: 2) | 500385818 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170916 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179768044 (Comments: 2) | 500386264 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170914 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179760853 (Comments: 2) | Treasure Coast Canvas And Upholstery (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170908 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179748869 (Comments: 2) | OneTouch Appliance Repair (Discussed changesets: 2) | 👍 Thank you for removing the text by https://osm.org/changeset/179749277 commented 2026-03-20 17:33:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 179760650 (Comments: 2) | 16736354 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180170907 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-20 17:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 180170033 (Comments: 1) | 500386733 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:15:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180169893 (Comments: 1) | Paint Doctors & Epoxy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:12:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180169776 (Comments: 1) | 500385912 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:09:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180169520 (Comments: 1) | 500375280 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 17:03:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 177782225 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, this changeset seems to have added business tags to this building which is incorrect since this building houses many businesses (more than 6) so the best thing to do is to make a node for the new business where its located instead of adding th... commented 2026-03-20 16:44:30 UTC by JessAk71 ♦125 |
| 167579082 (Comments: 1) | vanessatryfi (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, this changeset seems to have added the restaurant as a building which is incorrect since its located inside the already correctly mapped building, it should have an amenity restaurant tag and be mapped as a node here. I have updated this for y... commented 2026-03-20 16:40:58 UTC by JessAk71 ♦125 |
| 180134049 (Comments: 1) | Mom Tomahawk (Discussed changesets: 12) | This should be noname=yes; refs are not names. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180134049 commented 2026-03-20 16:31:04 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,395 |
| 180167801 (Comments: 1) | Queen Annes Lace (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 16:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180162734 (Comments: 1) | Chrisricketts82 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on th... commented 2026-03-20 15:52:11 UTC by MassCartog ♦335 |
| 178169012 (Comments: 1) | TB@HOTMAIL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for clarifying this for me! commented 2026-03-20 15:22:23 UTC by moonpenny ♦2 |
| 178789982 (Comments: 1) | Exporter7281 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a duplicate of the one several feet up the road in changeset 174626392? One may need to be deleted unless there are two there now; would not be the first redundancy in this city. commented 2026-03-20 15:12:54 UTC by moonpenny ♦2 |
| 180163979 (Comments: 1) | 500386532 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 15:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180163709 (Comments: 1) | RS Sports Cards (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:54:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180163291 (Comments: 1) | 500387125 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:45:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180163141 (Comments: 1) | 500386716 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:42:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180162981 (Comments: 1) | 500386998 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:39:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180162852 (Comments: 1) | 500386707 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 14:36:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180144098 (Comments: 2) | Conn Law (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10236532415 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead o... commented 2026-03-20 14:06:26 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180160810 (Comments: 1) | 500383360 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 13:54:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 164390360 (Comments: 1) | haprager (Discussed changesets: 9) | need more information as to why you think it needs to be routed along US 20 in the fixme? commented 2026-03-20 13:40:59 UTC by Natfoot ♦106 |
| 180157046 (Comments: 1) | Donald Roman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 12:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180132171 (Comments: 1) | santamonicaeliteroofers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:180152775 commented 2026-03-20 10:59:23 UTC by MappingMore ♦247 |
| 180023931 (Comments: 1) | JayEmm89 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:180148852 commented 2026-03-20 09:21:49 UTC by rajdhani ♦28 |
| 180147691 (Comments: 1) | howardbrown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-20 08:54:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180126918 (Comments: 1) | nitro_jesus (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for reading the Wiki!! Love that. commented 2026-03-20 05:34:46 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 180129371 (Comments: 2) | Lawrenceburg Home Boutique (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 05:33:14 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180128342 (Comments: 2) | Woodsense LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 05:33:14 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180127204 (Comments: 2) | 500384166 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-20 05:33:13 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179717846 (Comments: 2) | cravenbailbondsohio (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180140271 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-20 05:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 180136548 (Comments: 2) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 37) | they didn't annex the parkway/parking strip for some reason commented 2026-03-20 03:46:09 UTC by ieguy3 ♦37 |
| 180135682 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 37) | it was annexation of camelback road commented 2026-03-20 02:31:56 UTC by ieguy3 ♦37 |
| 179955222 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 211) | Okay, I guess that makes sense. Unrelated, but a long time ago, I downgraded Desert Inn Road west of Rainbow Boulevard to secondary. A few days ago, I upgraded Sky Vista Drive to primary because: a) It is the westernmost arterial (for now) of some... commented 2026-03-20 02:08:18 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦200 |
| 180134840 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 37) | jackrabbit trail was annexed. forgot to include it in the last update for this area commented 2026-03-20 01:19:39 UTC by ieguy3 ♦37 |
| 179588503 (Comments: 1) | B1llyB0nes (Discussed changesets: 1) | I did not spot any ALPR device in that intersection. What is there is a standard traffic camera. Be sure to reference the deflock.me for images on existing ALPRs. What's most commonly found on intersections like these are the white Genete... commented 2026-03-20 01:18:27 UTC by NG218 ♦9 |
| 180131366 (Comments: 1) | 500386668 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 22:00:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 178993590 (Comments: 1) | cwodwrth (Discussed changesets: 2) | 5.23 has been decommissioned and is now Taxiway J commented 2026-03-19 21:48:11 UTC by scs411scs ♦1 |
| 180130535 (Comments: 1) | 500378474 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 21:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180130426 (Comments: 1) | 10116091 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 21:24:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180130166 (Comments: 1) | Decadent Gifts & Gallery (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 21:18:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180128111 (Comments: 1) | Sounds Classic (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 20:15:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180127585 (Comments: 1) | Edible Arrangements (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:57:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180127365 (Comments: 1) | 500381930 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:54:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180127268 (Comments: 1) | 500386509 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:48:45 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180127123 (Comments: 1) | Fabric Frenzy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:45:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180126568 (Comments: 1) | 500386167 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:30:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180126400 (Comments: 1) | 500386670 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 19:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180118282 (Comments: 2) | 500382435 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 17:34:05 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180108439 (Comments: 2) | Ron’s Complete Auto Body (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 17:34:04 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179714366 (Comments: 2) | 500371997 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/180122439 commented 2026-03-19 17:33:54 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 179711106 (Comments: 2) | Lake Forest Pack & Ship (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122458 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:53 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179710504 (Comments: 2) | Skalitzky Culvert (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122456 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:52 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179708222 (Comments: 2) | Shady Spring Dental Care Bluefied (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122444 (Delete spam tags. First version) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:43 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179707649 (Comments: 2) | Express Lawn Care & Landscaping (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122441 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:41 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179706847 (Comments: 2) | 500371997 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122439 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:40 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179706727 (Comments: 2) | 500386242 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122438 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:37 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179706577 (Comments: 2) | 500385947 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122437 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:35 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179706287 (Comments: 2) | 500386077 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122434 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:34 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179704127 (Comments: 2) | 500385837 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122432 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:30 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179703763 (Comments: 2) | 500385325 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122430 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179703332 (Comments: 2) | 500380859 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122428 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:25 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179702021 (Comments: 2) | 500384946 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122426 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179701215 (Comments: 2) | 500385662 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122420 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179700222 (Comments: 2) | 500360688 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122417 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179689107 (Comments: 2) | Rob Ault (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180122413 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 17:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179677935 (Comments: 2) | hkmcincinnati (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179813253 commented 2026-03-19 17:33:03 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 180121929 (Comments: 1) | 500383422 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 17:24:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180080195 (Comments: 1) | Klutz Cargo (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reverted this change. The correct course of action to is to change it to a path, and update the access tag to private which I did. I also added the fences and gates. OSM maps private roads all the time, if we just delete them people may re... commented 2026-03-19 17:09:17 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦96 |
| 180114133 (Comments: 2) | Mike Glover (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Mike Glover, please don't remove roads in areas behind gates, these are valid features if they still exist. "Restricted and gated area" is not a valid reason to remove them from OSM. Please use OSM access tags instead, thanks. commented 2026-03-19 16:17:03 UTC by MassCartog ♦335 |
| 180118527 (Comments: 1) | Thomas Trailers and Equipment (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 16:09:52 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180117297 (Comments: 1) | cabotpsychologicalservice (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 15:45:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179726812 (Comments: 1) | VLD322 (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hi, could you check these crossings? "crossing:lines" is not used in other places, and the combination doesn't make sense: crossing:lines = no crossing:markings = lines commented 2026-03-19 11:26:45 UTC by mueschel ♦7,001 |
| 180059914 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 75) | Changed 40T/56' restriction to 18T/30' based on street signs. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180100504 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-19 10:18:19 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦69 |
| 180098131 (Comments: 1) | Cabot Psychological Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-19 09:30:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180033807 (Comments: 1) | eeweitongyi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id 180094309 commented 2026-03-19 07:50:49 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180064437 (Comments: 1) | iandees (Discussed changesets: 79) | Revert of 180039017 commented 2026-03-19 07:32:05 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 180075479 (Comments: 2) | Rock Run Events (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 05:33:40 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180071171 (Comments: 2) | 500383561 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 05:33:39 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 180075210 (Comments: 2) | 500374057 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-19 05:33:39 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179672845 (Comments: 2) | Regent Restoration Denton (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089548 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:34 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179668337 (Comments: 2) | hkmbirmingham (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179813230 commented 2026-03-19 05:33:31 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 179662032 (Comments: 2) | Maclean Of Duart Enterprises (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089546 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:29 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179660525 (Comments: 2) | 15283313 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089540 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:26 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179661041 (Comments: 2) | Dallas Mastic (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179661563 commented 2026-03-19 05:33:26 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 179660387 (Comments: 2) | 500384388 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089539 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:25 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179660273 (Comments: 2) | 500385523 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089537 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:24 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179660083 (Comments: 2) | 500385112 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089534 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179658704 (Comments: 2) | Panaderia y Tienda Guadalajara 3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089533 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:23 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179657957 (Comments: 2) | 500381413 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089528 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:20 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179657505 (Comments: 2) | 500382012 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089526 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179657762 (Comments: 2) | 500383852 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089527 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:19 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179657352 (Comments: 2) | 500385601 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089525 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:18 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179657005 (Comments: 2) | 10108521 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089523 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:17 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179656741 (Comments: 2) | 500385256 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089522 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:16 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179656506 (Comments: 2) | AirTec Heating (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089521 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:15 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179656211 (Comments: 2) | 500385324 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089520 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179656066 (Comments: 2) | 500385375 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089519 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179655734 (Comments: 2) | 500384017 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089516 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179655551 (Comments: 2) | 500377824 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089515 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:10 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179654459 (Comments: 2) | 500374490 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180089513 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-19 05:33:09 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179905419 (Comments: 1) | pvwheatley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! Please note that private driveways should still be mapped on OSM, as we have a practice of "map whats on the ground", regardless of if it is private or public property. Private driveways should instead be given the tag of acce... commented 2026-03-19 04:12:40 UTC by maxwellward ♦13 |
| 179543424 (Comments: 1) | lebedits (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hey, looks like you have 7 warnings flagged by the editor on this changeset (roads disconnected from the main road network, roads crossing each other and buildings). Please try to resolve those before uploading, unless the warnings are inaccurate. I&... commented 2026-03-19 03:51:14 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 180080302 (Comments: 1) | Th3eit (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. And address isn't "demolished" so don't add demolished prefixes to those tags. I've added them back on the building. Thanks! commented 2026-03-19 03:46:44 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 179498329 (Comments: 2) | bobthebuilder423468 (Discussed changesets: 13) | 👀 commented 2026-03-19 01:54:18 UTC by tguen ♦107 |
| 136918299 (Comments: 2) | treestryder (Discussed changesets: 29) | <shrug> The output was likely fat fingered. I must have been in a hurry, because at the time the practice was to use the official name of the Supercharger, "New Springfield, OH - Mahoning Valley Service Plaza" in this case (... commented 2026-03-19 01:12:22 UTC by treestryder ♦185 |
| 179884078 (Comments: 1) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 5) | Partially Revert of 179882859 commented 2026-03-19 00:50:48 UTC by MappingMore ♦247 |
| 179965539 (Comments: 1) | impiaaa (Discussed changesets: 27) | Partially Revert of 179882859 commented 2026-03-19 00:50:37 UTC by MappingMore ♦247 |
| 180024248 (Comments: 2) | TheRealMattRogers (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for letting me know! I have made the correction on the home address to S 4th Drive. I appreciate the help for a first-time editor! :) commented 2026-03-18 23:38:41 UTC by TheRealMattRogers ♦1 |
| 180037998 (Comments: 1) | DMisterS644 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I changed the road back to an alley. According to the OSM WIki, that is the correct tag for the way. I'll send you a message with more info about OSM and a link to the wiki. Let me know if you have any questions. --- ... commented 2026-03-18 22:43:51 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 180038288 (Comments: 1) | DMisterS644 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I removed the address node you added because the house already is tagged with the same address. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180038288 commented 2026-03-18 22:42:43 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 180079345 (Comments: 1) | 500383420 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 21:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180079189 (Comments: 1) | 500384183 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 21:09:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180079029 (Comments: 1) | 500386178 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 21:03:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180077138 (Comments: 1) | 500383974 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 20:03:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180076996 (Comments: 1) | 500385217 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 20:00:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180076910 (Comments: 1) | 15576678 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 19:54:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180076328 (Comments: 1) | 500384233 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-18 19:36:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179660496 (Comments: 4) | kaiyuen (Discussed changesets: 1) | This isn't updated yet. commented 2026-03-18 18:58:28 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 179749277 (Comments: 1) | OneTouch Appliance Repair (Discussed changesets: 2) | Is this marked on a sign at this building? Is it a place customers would go to to drop off appliances? commented 2026-03-18 18:48:06 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 180071494 (Comments: 1) | Bubble FTW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please do not add names to things that do not have names. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions commented 2026-03-18 18:38:08 UTC by impiaaa ♦461 |
| 179725885 (Comments: 3) | jb_seattle (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1487825283 really called 318th Street as well? If it has a designation at all, I'd expect it to be 103rd Avenue, since it's a north-south street. commented 2026-03-18 18:33:02 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 179876349 (Comments: 1) | terriblememory (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good, thanks for all the edits! If you have any questions, https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ is a great resource, or you can leave a message here. Thanks again and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-03-18 18:15:22 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 179971053 (Comments: 3) | LDiekmann (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the reply, and thanks for the understanding. The normal recommendation from the OSM community is exactly what It sounds like you are doing already. Make the ground reality match what you would like to see on the map. When the trail no logg... commented 2026-03-18 17:59:50 UTC by MassCartog ♦335 |
| 180071556 (Comments: 1) | birdrz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good, thanks for the contributions! If you have any questions about OpenStreetMap, please feel free to reach out to other local mappers here or at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ Welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-03-18 17:55:55 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 179649603 (Comments: 2) | Start Again Counseling (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180071779 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179648249 (Comments: 2) | The Cleaning Authority at Woodburn (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180071776 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 17:33:09 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179622322 (Comments: 2) | moleremovalsacramento (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180071769 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 17:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179964769 (Comments: 1) | MATNC (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id:180071519 commented 2026-03-18 17:28:52 UTC by MappingMore ♦247 |
| 158439485 (Comments: 1) | CraigPe (Discussed changesets: 3) | I don't think things like "Tributary H-2.2" are names - they're internal identifiers (possibly refs), but definitely not commonly known or used by the average person to refer to these waterways, as the `name` tag would suggest. Fo... commented 2026-03-18 17:14:28 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦37 |
| 180030852 (Comments: 1) | Yhor (Discussed changesets: 8) | A private to private connection should still just be private, not no. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180030852 commented 2026-03-18 16:17:19 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,395 |
| 180030968 (Comments: 1) | Yhor (Discussed changesets: 8) | Wonder if there's a FOSS version of something like that. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/180030968 commented 2026-03-18 16:15:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,395 |
| 180004198 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The unnecessary split has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180065664#map=17/42.520872/-70.922611. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 15:30:55 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179562276 (Comments: 2) | Natfoot (Discussed changesets: 66) | deletion should not be the option here even if it was gone. Abandoned can be used even if there are signs track was there. If you are only arm chair mapping via imagery. the key is that is on track MOW equipment on this spur and really should be tag... commented 2026-03-18 15:08:01 UTC by Natfoot ♦106 |
| 180059282 (Comments: 1) | trollface7 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11078831160, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7564900634 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move t... commented 2026-03-18 15:06:22 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180039017 (Comments: 1) | chickrocksusa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2846663732, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4971238093, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6450632092 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happen... commented 2026-03-18 15:05:18 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180027756 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong and unnecessary tags on the Appleton street have since been removed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180064160. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 15:00:33 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180046311 (Comments: 1) | navsolo (Discussed changesets: 1) | I will prefice this with this is a minor nit pick and you can feel free to ignore this but, when I first read this changeset comment (without knowing you are part of the amazon logistics team) I thought that this was a changeset where someone didnt l... commented 2026-03-18 14:51:27 UTC by Udarian ♦677 |
| 179996698 (Comments: 1) | vatlark (Discussed changesets: 3) | dawg this changeset should not span multiple countries. commented 2026-03-18 13:49:40 UTC by dmjab13 ♦87 |
| 173859848 (Comments: 1) | jhaluska80 (Discussed changesets: 28) | corrected school phone number in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180057612 commented 2026-03-18 12:34:36 UTC by wireguy ♦559 |
| 179320278 (Comments: 2) | PowerMapper77 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for the information. Always learning. We will be conducting a review of all of our uploads in a few days. commented 2026-03-18 11:07:29 UTC by PowerMapper77 ♦1 |
| 180028331 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 75) | Fixed 40T/56' restriction to 18T/30' based on street signs. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180052799 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 10:55:41 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦69 |
| 180029041 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 75) | Fixing 40T/56' restriction to 18T/30' based on street signs. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180052541 #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 10:51:45 UTC by IvanaŠokčević ♦69 |
| 180000383 (Comments: 3) | Inplace Studio (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in changeset id: 180047698 commented 2026-03-18 09:21:56 UTC by ajmat ♦79 |
| 175012676 (Comments: 1) | Troy Hartwig (Discussed changesets: 1) | Note the wiki description of tourism=camp_pitch : "The pitch must be located within an area tagged tourism=camp_site ". In other words, all these standalone “camp_pitch” should probably be created as “camp_site” inst... commented 2026-03-18 08:19:15 UTC by Lostmonkey ♦121 |
| 179856640 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 73) | Wrong hgv restriction that was made in this changeset was fixed in 180043735. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-18 07:51:49 UTC by JakovBušić ♦69 |
| 180029782 (Comments: 2) | 500361082 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-18 05:33:20 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179613516 (Comments: 2) | hkmmilwaukee (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🚫 Text removed by https://osm.org/changeset/179632882 commented 2026-03-18 05:33:15 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 179604079 (Comments: 2) | 500383427 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039151 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:14 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179603112 (Comments: 2) | Baum's Boots & More (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039150 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:13 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179602386 (Comments: 2) | 500379029 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039147 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179602698 (Comments: 2) | 500383121 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039148 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:11 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179602340 (Comments: 2) | High Value Signs (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039146 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179601105 (Comments: 2) | Country Lawn & Garden (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039141 (Restore previous tags. No changes) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179600646 (Comments: 2) | 15789254 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180039140 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-18 05:33:04 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179945058 (Comments: 3) | Shel_Sri (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi iandees, By visual appearance I reclassified as residential, but I didn’t realize it was inside a parking polygon at that time. I have made the corrections, thank you for pointing this out. commented 2026-03-18 05:13:04 UTC by Shel_Sri ♦8 |
| 180038281 (Comments: 1) | pesticides (Discussed changesets: 29) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5083454 commented 2026-03-18 05:09:20 UTC by pesticides ♦37 |
| 180028821 (Comments: 1) | OSMJon22 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi Jon, thanks for requesting a review and leaving a detailed, helpful changeset comment! it looks like this changeset entirely deleted the driveway and its nodes, instead of splitting the way and tagging it appropriately, as you've prope... commented 2026-03-18 05:00:56 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦111 |
| 178969801 (Comments: 2) | PedestrianMapping_MapObscura (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks for the feedback! I’ll make sure to add those where appropriate commented 2026-03-18 04:55:36 UTC by PedestrianMapping_MapObscura ♦3 |
| 179768883 (Comments: 1) | Lc4590 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lc4590, Is this defibrillator inside the Fourth & Vine Building? And are there 2 separate units, one on floor 1 and one on floor 5? Thanks, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! commented 2026-03-18 04:34:48 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 179930562 (Comments: 1) | rmx90210 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Please try to keep edits within a reasonable geographic area. It can make it difficult to decipher changelogs of local areas. commented 2026-03-18 02:06:38 UTC by Rambling Banjo ♦3 |
| 179446629 (Comments: 1) | trailrunner13 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, I noticed you've tagged a few locations with the same tags on the lot and the building. Please don't do this, it's against OSM guidelines. osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Also I don't think this counts as... commented 2026-03-18 00:50:55 UTC by tguen ♦107 |
| 180030061 (Comments: 1) | Moregon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks. Is this name written on a sign? What type of feature is it (shop, etc.)? commented 2026-03-18 00:38:25 UTC by pwbriggs ♦197 |
| 179839102 (Comments: 1) | TorCguy (Discussed changesets: 30) | As I have asked several times before, please stop using 'ref' tag for the state road tagging in North Carolina. The proper tag is 'unsigned_ref' commented 2026-03-18 00:08:05 UTC by rivermont ♦239 |
| 179883833 (Comments: 1) | TorCguy (Discussed changesets: 30) | What is NCCH Orthos? You are adding it as a source on tons of features commented 2026-03-18 00:07:03 UTC by rivermont ♦239 |
| 179733788 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Baloo Uriza, My name is Surander, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. I have corrected the way in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179926704#map=18/36.031... commented 2026-03-17 23:58:08 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦13 |
| 180030888 (Comments: 1) | dkronz6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/176011467 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of ... commented 2026-03-17 22:38:41 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 177902618 (Comments: 1) | Vivek Gupta Milpitas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maybe should be scrubbed entirely given the stated source of Google Maps, per OSM policy? commented 2026-03-17 22:35:28 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦111 |
| 177923593 (Comments: 2) | Vivek Gupta Fremont (Discussed changesets: 1) | Maybe it should be deleted entirely, though, given the stated source of Google Maps in violation of OSM policy... commented 2026-03-17 22:33:47 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦111 |
| 167934011 (Comments: 1) | homero89 (Discussed changesets: 2) | please check for duplicates before importing... commented 2026-03-17 22:02:27 UTC by stillhart ♦206 |
| 180029542 (Comments: 1) | Midwest Wellness Lounge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 21:48:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179908364 (Comments: 4) | imjustmappin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there :) there are some debatable things going on here: - sidewalkd crossing driveways don't need a highway=crossing node, at least that's what I took from the forum discussions. - you nestled several landuses here. ... commented 2026-03-17 21:38:35 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦3,922 |
| 179984262 (Comments: 1) | ajmat (Discussed changesets: 12) | This path is not passable, it is blocked on both ends to prevent access. commented 2026-03-17 21:24:15 UTC by I am Vigo ♦1 |
| 180014983 (Comments: 1) | JLMLH365 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6605488244, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8236460242 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move th... commented 2026-03-17 20:19:45 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 180026089 (Comments: 1) | crushtheserpent (Discussed changesets: 16) | I also removed recently added duplicate info from a Home Depot. Most of the information was already present in another way that is the outline of the entire store complex, not just the building. commented 2026-03-17 19:58:01 UTC by crushtheserpent ♦20 |
| 179878877 (Comments: 3) | Thomas Goyne (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks, I'll fix it! commented 2026-03-17 19:05:14 UTC by cuzi ♦151 |
| 180023696 (Comments: 1) | 500384947 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 18:39:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179775132 (Comments: 1) | mdroads (Discussed changesets: 32) | The road alignments here prior to your changeset were up-to-date. The new alignments are more visible in the Esri imagery which is dated Feb 22, 2025. commented 2026-03-17 18:24:44 UTC by Joseph R P ♦414 |
| 180000306 (Comments: 2) | Inplace Studio (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 The mentioned node appears to be part of a highway=* Businesses are usually mapped as standalone nodes (or within building polygons), rather than as part of a road geometry. commented 2026-03-17 17:33:17 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179594718 (Comments: 2) | 500377372 (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020676 (Restore previous tags. No changes) If you believe this was incorrect or would like to clari... commented 2026-03-17 17:33:12 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179575885 (Comments: 2) | filfilmke (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/180020655 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-17 17:33:07 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 179572371 (Comments: 2) | ruscoexteriors (Discussed changesets: 1) | ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179944647 commented 2026-03-17 17:33:04 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 180020594 (Comments: 1) | EvanSiroky (Discussed changesets: 13) | Source: https://southgaterecandpark.gov/wp-content/uploads/Southgate-Facilities-Map-2022.pdf commented 2026-03-17 17:32:30 UTC by EvanSiroky ♦63 |
| 179953842 (Comments: 1) | kobejim2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thanks for going back to clean up. Much appreciated. I did find a couple of near-fixes that you should be careful of going forward. See the area around https://openstreetmap.org/node/10274269213 for an example of a fairway still crossing a green. ... commented 2026-03-17 16:50:30 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 179964932 (Comments: 3) | molinamos (Discussed changesets: 3) | I've never looked that close before. thanks for pointing it out. commented 2026-03-17 16:50:10 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 179927648 (Comments: 1) | Esther_Rims (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please make sure fairways and greens don't intersect/overlap. Same can be said for the various other golf areas as well (tees, bunkers, water hazards, etc) commented 2026-03-17 16:43:36 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 180016932 (Comments: 1) | 500380215 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 16:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179827272 (Comments: 1) | AntiCompositeNumber (Discussed changesets: 11) | fixed area to just the park area and not the entire parcel owned by the town which included cemetery and transfer station. commented 2026-03-17 16:02:12 UTC by dkwolf ♦7 |
| 180010537 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit, fixed in changeset/180013549 commented 2026-03-17 15:25:25 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 180010180 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit and missed a segment, fixed in changeset/180013418 commented 2026-03-17 15:23:22 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 180013230 (Comments: 1) | 500385405 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 15:21:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 180009692 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit, fixed in changeset/180013217 commented 2026-03-17 15:18:36 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 180009003 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit fixed in changeset/180012901 commented 2026-03-17 15:16:25 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 180009384 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit fixed in changeset/180013059 commented 2026-03-17 15:15:04 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 180006433 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 27) | Used wrong unit, fixed in changeset/180012644 commented 2026-03-17 15:06:45 UTC by JakovRajić ♦17 |
| 159917629 (Comments: 4) | Ekaterina Nov G (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, The building is reverted back. Is it correct? commented 2026-03-17 13:32:30 UTC by Ekaterina Nov G ♦3 |
| 159917601 (Comments: 4) | Ekaterina Nov G (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, The building is reverted back. Is it correct? commented 2026-03-17 13:29:09 UTC by Ekaterina Nov G ♦3 |
| 180000511 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been corrected in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006724. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 13:03:03 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180000206 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been corrected in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006642#map=17/42.531141/-70.918626. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 13:01:41 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180006642 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | This changeset is the correction of the wrong tag from the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180000206. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 13:01:19 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180004710 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006133. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 12:50:08 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 180004376 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180006048. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-17 12:48:19 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179998620 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The redundant and incrrect tags have since been corrected in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180005918. commented 2026-03-17 12:45:40 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179998668 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The redundant and incrrect tags have since been corrected in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180005918. commented 2026-03-17 12:45:38 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 167258169 (Comments: 4) | Reino Baptista (Discussed changesets: 111) | Great. I completely agree. Suggested changes have been made. RB👋 commented 2026-03-17 10:15:30 UTC by Reino Baptista ♦109 |
| 179959461 (Comments: 2) | jm428 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revert of 179922358 commented 2026-03-17 09:17:37 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 179970410 (Comments: 1) | I am Vigo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in changeset id 179992234 commented 2026-03-17 09:09:19 UTC by 007Transformer ♦54 |
| 179991872 (Comments: 1) | Cuddpressure (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-17 09:03:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179884051 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 5) | Thank you for the feedback. I feel like this sort of topic has been discussed many times before, of whether to have many individual changesets or fewer but limited in scope. My conclusion is that there are various suitable tools to analyse his... commented 2026-03-17 07:29:58 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦364 |
| 179883615 (Comments: 1) | Emersade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in changeset id:179984773 commented 2026-03-17 06:45:57 UTC by rajdhani ♦28 |
| 179904897 (Comments: 1) | khag7 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13650119808/history has pedestrian = yes that was added in this edit Was it supposed to mark legal pedestrian access? In such case - foot=yes is the normal tag for it, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wi... commented 2026-03-17 06:43:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,624 |
| 179465836 (Comments: 4) | CIMDigital (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for your reply here. Your added description was not factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Feel free to add your business again. commented 2026-03-17 06:32:52 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,076 |
| 179883786 (Comments: 2) | NeisRevert (Discussed changesets: 9) | Thank you for your reply here. Your added description was not factual, and free from marketing or promotional language. Feel free to add your business again. commented 2026-03-17 06:32:21 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,076 |
| 179975157 (Comments: 5) | lncvyz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for fixing @jm428 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179977014 commented 2026-03-17 06:26:26 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,076 |
| 179971969 (Comments: 2) | 500384835 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-17 05:33:21 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179973088 (Comments: 2) | 500374808 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-17 05:33:21 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179962139 (Comments: 2) | 500384615 (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-17 05:33:20 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179962324 (Comments: 2) | 500384796 (Discussed changesets: 2) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-17 05:33:20 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 170999393 (Comments: 4) | ATownBike (Discussed changesets: 13) | ah. I added new imagery if you want to use it. commented 2026-03-17 05:22:15 UTC by Natfoot ♦106 |
| 179972718 (Comments: 1) | PeteyDC (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! I noticed that nodes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11363188673, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2937924554 were moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move t... commented 2026-03-17 04:22:15 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179976786 (Comments: 1) | Jarvis11 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! It looks like the website URL on way/409892940 may have been copied from Google Maps (it contained Google tracking parameters). Please be careful not to copy information from Google into OpenStreetMap, as Google's data is copyrighted. commented 2026-03-17 04:20:08 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179921700 (Comments: 3) | IsStatenIsland (Discussed changesets: 13) | I'm not questioning your sources. And I know that prefix tag is in some use, but I'm generally against about mapping features before they physically exist. My concern is that if the tags aren't updated later, we're left with in... commented 2026-03-17 04:11:12 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,524 |
| 179909320 (Comments: 1) | L28F422 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Revert of 179909230 commented 2026-03-17 03:40:05 UTC by MappingMore ♦247 |
| 179104012 (Comments: 1) | Windsor Essex Strong Towns (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, I saw your note on the Lower Peninsula relation. I'm not sure what the issue is, the Lower Peninsula is a distinct named geographic feature that people want to show on maps. There are dozens of natural=peninsula features of similar siz... commented 2026-03-17 02:34:37 UTC by quincylvania ♦86 |
| 179974944 (Comments: 1) | lncvyz (Discussed changesets: 2) | Various changes around Bell Boulevard: - Added more information to 18-25 212th Street, which houses PS 169 and Bell Academy - Added Bell Academy point alongside PS 169 - Adjusted outlines of several buildings commented 2026-03-17 01:59:03 UTC by lncvyz ♦2 |
| 179923702 (Comments: 1) | molinamos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179923702 commented 2026-03-17 01:51:08 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 179923606 (Comments: 1) | molinamos (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179923606 commented 2026-03-17 01:50:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,800 |
| 156078849 (Comments: 3) | UW Maddie (Discussed changesets: 41) | Thank you for the response, explanation, and fixes! commented 2026-03-17 01:31:31 UTC by Cookie Guru ♦13 |
| 179510339 (Comments: 1) | Jeremy T Blake (Discussed changesets: 1) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1486374280 et al Thanks for helping map golf courses. There are some problems with your edits however and your mapping process needs to be fixed going forward so you don't continue to step on the effo... commented 2026-03-17 00:20:11 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 179835798 (Comments: 2) | Ross Ortiz (Discussed changesets: 1) | are two sucursal commented 2026-03-16 22:56:46 UTC by Ross Ortiz ♦1 |
| 179972365 (Comments: 2) | NE2 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Good catch. Yes, they should, and I will fix it. commented 2026-03-16 22:01:43 UTC by NE2 ♦3 |
| 179877646 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tag has since been fixed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179973000. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-16 21:50:39 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 179972809 (Comments: 1) | 500384736 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 21:45:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179970010 (Comments: 1) | xhriswaltontexas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 20:21:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179651254 (Comments: 1) | ottwiz (Discussed changesets: 289) | There was no on-site survey - it's a mistake - I'm always converting task boundaries from Simple Tasking Manager as GPX files in JOSM so with highlighted color i can see the border of where I'm mapping - but it seems i forgot to remove... commented 2026-03-16 19:43:47 UTC by ottwiz ♦395 |
| 179875566 (Comments: 1) | IvaKraljić (Discussed changesets: 97) | The wrong tags for the park have since been removed in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179968300. #OptimoRoute commented 2026-03-16 19:32:23 UTC by IvaKraljić ♦62 |
| 177734816 (Comments: 1) | Ktr101 (Discussed changesets: 25) | Please do not create or assume names for features (e.g., “Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn”). Only add names when they can be verified from a street sign, official trail map, or municipal GIS source. If a road or track does not have a veri... commented 2026-03-16 19:16:58 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦141 |
| 179966435 (Comments: 1) | 500384753 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 18:42:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179964158 (Comments: 1) | unknown246 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Changeset 178160938 was reverted. Ignore above comment. commented 2026-03-16 17:51:38 UTC by unknown246 ♦11 |
| 178160938 (Comments: 2) | unknown246 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted. commented 2026-03-16 17:45:34 UTC by unknown246 ♦11 |
| 179963530 (Comments: 1) | Saint Arnold Brewing Company (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 17:33:53 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179947703 (Comments: 2) | LakshmySudeep (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🕵 It looks like you reintroduced text that was previously flagged as promotional and removed after a review. Could you please explain why it was added again? commented 2026-03-16 17:33:13 UTC by NeisAgent ♦63 |
| 179875903 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 211) | The correct tag for any sort of community within a larger community would be neighborhood, quarter, or suburb. "Community" is also a very vague word and thus would not make a good tag in OSM. You could essentially say that it already does e... commented 2026-03-16 17:25:09 UTC by Joseph R P ♦414 |
| 179963117 (Comments: 1) | Che Damian Hardy (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 17:24:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 176761888 (Comments: 7) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 168) | Despite this, I feel like physical construction is still an important part of road classification. Route 210 & Alvernon feature several grade separated interchanges in my opinion. commented 2026-03-16 16:51:14 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦149 |
| 179961415 (Comments: 1) | 500382905 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:48:50 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179961013 (Comments: 1) | 500365933 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:42:48 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179960345 (Comments: 1) | 500380512 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:30:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179960053 (Comments: 1) | 500383542 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:21:44 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179959852 (Comments: 1) | CarrTech: Smart Autobody Solutions (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:18:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179959602 (Comments: 1) | Baum’s Boots & More (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 16:15:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179926076 (Comments: 4) | thriswallors (Discussed changesets: 1) | Unfortunately there are many remaining trails that I suspect don't exist, as well as some buildings that certainly don't exist. However, I haven't verified on the ground, so I'm reluctant to remove them. commented 2026-03-16 16:10:06 UTC by thriswallors ♦1 |
| 179922656 (Comments: 1) | CalvinLewis26 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM! The outline of the building should show where the base of the building is. This is more difficult when the aerial imagery shows the imagery at an angle, because you'll end up with a much larger footprint th... commented 2026-03-16 15:42:57 UTC by jm428 ♦41 |
| 179957741 (Comments: 1) | Kate's Hallmark Shop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 15:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179957547 (Comments: 1) | Weber Sports (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 15:33:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179956363 (Comments: 1) | GLOW Medspa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 15:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179955895 (Comments: 1) | 500382959 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 14:57:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179849053 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 73) | The segments that were split unnecessarily have been merged back together in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179954121 commented 2026-03-16 14:16:27 UTC by TinPetreković ♦274 |
| 179062575 (Comments: 1) | UrbanUnPlanner (Discussed changesets: 20) | Nodes 92310197, 13599781835 and 13599779741 have yes' as value for lit, might that be a typo? commented 2026-03-16 14:08:41 UTC by Kees 59 ♦66 |
| 179950697 (Comments: 1) | bigbullyturfut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 12:57:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179940272 (Comments: 1) | partnerinaging (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 09:48:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179774711 (Comments: 3) | Stay Texas Hospitality Group (Discussed changesets: 1) | @MappingMore Thanks for fixing the mentioned issue and for commenting here. Would it be possible to add a direct link to the changeset instead of only the raw changeset ID? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179808537 would... commented 2026-03-16 07:56:11 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦6,076 |
| 179934302 (Comments: 1) | americanstoragesunbury (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 07:48:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 178516175 (Comments: 2) | Tre_brock (Discussed changesets: 6) | Was there any particular reason that you wanted to delete separately mapped sidewalks? commented 2026-03-16 06:35:18 UTC by jhuang97 ♦18 |
| 179652454 (Comments: 1) | Tre_brock (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello Tre, I would prefer if you did not delete sidewalks like this, see my comment under changeset 178516175. commented 2026-03-16 06:34:59 UTC by jhuang97 ♦18 |
| 179872823 (Comments: 1) | kobejim2 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Can you please go back and clean up all your fairways. They should not intersect or overlap with the green like you've done many times of the last few changes. Thanks. commented 2026-03-16 05:40:31 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 179797546 (Comments: 1) | RezGolf (Discussed changesets: 6) | RE: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1488525955 When drawing golf course areas (such as greens, fairways, bunkers, tees, etc.), please be aware that the ways used to outline those areas can't cross over each other. Fairway outlines shoul... commented 2026-03-16 05:27:10 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 179822414 (Comments: 1) | Taylor Gibson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Be careful marking out "rough" areas. They shouldn't extend deep into the trees. They also shouldn't intersect/touch other golf areas (like fairways and tees). Thanks. commented 2026-03-16 05:14:39 UTC by b-jazz ♦833 |
| 179927070 (Comments: 1) | Happy Labor LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 04:51:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179926767 (Comments: 1) | Happy Labor LLC (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-16 04:40:04 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 176201400 (Comments: 1) | ATownBike (Discussed changesets: 13) | according to the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway cycleway is still appropriate. this is also more important as this is part of USBRS 10 commented 2026-03-16 02:46:20 UTC by Natfoot ♦106 |
| 178968567 (Comments: 2) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 48) | My name is Gaurav, and I'm a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for your insight! There are different approaches on the OSM for adding turn:lanes. Our general approach is to add lanes & turn:lanes tag only when there ar... commented 2026-03-16 02:23:58 UTC by grawat_Lyft ♦16 |
| 178969535 (Comments: 2) | grawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 48) | Hi, my name is Gaurav and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your comment. Based on the most recent Lyft-owned aerial imagery(https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bvxjLNAX0ovVQJdJhGNgUBWZ3-H0wpKN/view?usp=sharing), it clearly sh... commented 2026-03-16 02:22:25 UTC by grawat_Lyft ♦16 |
| 179881105 (Comments: 3) | Channel91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yeah you are right that the grayed values are usually the implied defaults so it is strange that they are all set to yes. I asked some people who are more experienced than I am. One said they usually don't set the access tag unless it is signed ... commented 2026-03-16 01:57:46 UTC by jm428 ♦41 |
| 179922825 (Comments: 1) | CalvinLewis26 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! I noticed that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9733532751 was moved a long distance in this changeset. This is a common mistake that happens when you click on a point and drag to move the map. The point moves with your mouse instead of... commented 2026-03-16 01:22:33 UTC by iandees ♦950 |
| 179922358 (Comments: 1) | CalvinLewis26 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome, and thanks for your edits! I noticed a few unintended crossings between roads and/or between roads and buildings in this changeset. This usually happens when geometry snaps incorrectly. Additionally, changes to tagging (e.g. modifying... commented 2026-03-16 00:39:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179669801 (Comments: 5) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 168) | Oh, okay. I guess that makes sense. When I get the chance, I'll fix these road links (and fix the shoulders of the Beltway as well). commented 2026-03-15 23:15:20 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦200 |
| 179915556 (Comments: 1) | Tristan West (Discussed changesets: 13) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179919050 commented 2026-03-15 21:47:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,840 |
| 179477327 (Comments: 2) | IN Focus First (Discussed changesets: 1) | 👍 Thank you for updating the element by https://osm.org/changeset/179477700 commented 2026-03-15 17:33:07 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 179475902 (Comments: 2) | Regent Restoration Denton (Discussed changesets: 3) | ❌ Text fixed by https://osm.org/changeset/179483573 commented 2026-03-15 17:33:06 UTC by NeisReview ♦2,279 |
| 179474670 (Comments: 2) | Wilson Thompson Insurance Services (Discussed changesets: 1) | 🔄🤖 Partly reverted due to either a lack of response from the contributor or remaining promotional text by https://osm.org/changeset/179910352 (Clean up leftovers from previous edits) commented 2026-03-15 17:33:05 UTC by NeisRevert ♦1,462 |
| 30449790 (Comments: 2) | flierfy (Discussed changesets: 123) | I applied the current tagging scheme. And this scheme wants tracks, which are controlled by dwarf signals, to be tagged service= yard. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:usage commented 2026-03-15 17:22:23 UTC by flierfy ♦67 |
| 179909577 (Comments: 1) | successonthespectrum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 17:15:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 174398603 (Comments: 1) | GenericUsername4 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Take care with the flow direction of waterways - I've had to reverse the direction of many of these. You can also view either the National Map Topographic layer or the USGS Topographic Maps layer to find out what they are named. (For example, th... commented 2026-03-15 14:56:44 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦37 |
| 179899989 (Comments: 1) | Hoaglund and Sons Concrete (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! Your changeset was commented because your added description, note or slogan contain detailed text that may be interpreted as promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral a... commented 2026-03-15 14:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦6,359 |
| 179898164 (Comments: 2) | Cwan123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! It looks like a node in this changeset was accidentally moved. This can happen when panning the map. The node has been moved back to its previous position. commented 2026-03-15 13:44:01 UTC by iandees ♦950 |