| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 175659209 (Comments: 1) | UW Maddie (Discussed changesets: 39) | If some of the curbs look like they don't match aerial imagery, that's because I used the latest 2025 mapillary images to verify the newly constructed curbs commented 2025-12-08 10:30:10 UTC by UW Maddie ♦28 |
| 175651707 (Comments: 1) | UW Maddie (Discussed changesets: 39) | If some of the curbs look like they don't match aerial imagery, that's because I used the latest 2025 mapillary images to verify the newly constructed curbs commented 2025-12-08 07:35:27 UTC by UW Maddie ♦28 |
| 175344030 (Comments: 3) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 51) | No biggie! If there was indeed a reduction in the number of lines then all could be well! Just check the subway validator (I think the one at vk.com runs often) after making rapid transit changes. CoMaps' runs a few times a month. commented 2025-12-08 07:23:25 UTC by orthocircular ♦122 |
| 155841906 (Comments: 1) | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (Discussed changesets: 110) | Could someone get it worked out so clicking on the Stansbury Island, UT node would create a boundary similar to what Antelope Island, UT has? commented 2025-12-08 07:12:41 UTC by OquirrhMountainMan ♦2 |
| 175636133 (Comments: 1) | Lonestargut (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/3621209058 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-08 07:07:58 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 175647040 (Comments: 1) | KyanJ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/65523264 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-08 06:42:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 174933403 (Comments: 7) | likeToTravel (Discussed changesets: 4) | We are not talking about the name of the path, but about the spelling. Please refer to the wiki https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Names; even the abbreviation is undesirable. commented 2025-12-08 05:59:54 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 175479968 (Comments: 1) | RobertS (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175479968 commented 2025-12-08 05:10:37 UTC by jmarchon ♦438 |
| 175473980 (Comments: 1) | Sequoia626 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Looks good1 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175473980 commented 2025-12-08 05:09:30 UTC by jmarchon ♦438 |
| 175614191 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | be careful not to use data from other sources! they have to have compatible licensing, copying something from google maps/google streetview is prohibited. heres a little tip, you may use bing streetside which is built right into ID editor! hit &qu... commented 2025-12-08 04:19:00 UTC by Fen <3 ♦9 |
| 175643004 (Comments: 2) | MadCat3D (Discussed changesets: 1) | nope, that was a mistake, not sure how I did that but I will fix that, thanks for pointing that out. commented 2025-12-08 03:57:01 UTC by MadCat3D ♦2 |
| 175644338 (Comments: 1) | uranium2662 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello uranium2662, and welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. Because of our slightly unusual street names here in Utah, we have a specific page on the wiki about it (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/Naming_Conventi... commented 2025-12-08 03:50:16 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦59 |
| 175645343 (Comments: 1) | Rick sanches (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there, and welcome to OSM! I see you added a Flock camera in a parking lot, but I don't think the camera is here. Could you please adjust the camera's geometry to be along the road? commented 2025-12-08 03:48:19 UTC by QuiLe ♦14 |
| 175423928 (Comments: 2) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 11) | From the direction of the I-5 hey lead to military bases Marine Corps Recruit Depot and Naval Base Point Loma. It also leads to the tourist destination Liberty Station. The corridor may also be used by students and faculty of Point Loma Nazarene Univ... commented 2025-12-08 03:47:06 UTC by Yushclay ♦13 |
| 175643969 (Comments: 1) | kaleidoscopica (Discussed changesets: 12) | Heeeeeey, could you be a little more descriptive on your change set names? it makes them harder to review when they're all just "various changes" --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... commented 2025-12-08 03:42:16 UTC by patmorgan235 ♦3 |
| 175645978 (Comments: 1) | yahirthebravo (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Thanks for your contribution! In the future try and square up your building foot prints so they're nice and pretty. You can do this by pressing q if you're using the iD editor on OpenStreetMap.org --- ... commented 2025-12-08 03:30:53 UTC by patmorgan235 ♦3 |
| 175646180 (Comments: 1) | chumpy100 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey thanks for your contribution! in the future please square up your tennis courts, you can do this by pressing Q if your using the iD editor on OpenStreatMap.org --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmc... commented 2025-12-08 03:27:53 UTC by patmorgan235 ♦3 |
| 146324882 (Comments: 3) | emersonveenstra (Discussed changesets: 75) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-08 01:55:55 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 117336427 (Comments: 2) | KB-01 (Discussed changesets: 37) | That was me converting "maxweight = 33 Tons" into standard metric tons because I didn't know how to properly tag US short tons. maxweight = 33 st would be more appropriate. commented 2025-12-08 01:21:08 UTC by KB-01 ♦26 |
| 175592282 (Comments: 1) | Fan7787 (Discussed changesets: 24) | Please specify a source for new roads commented 2025-12-08 01:10:05 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,139 |
| 175644562 (Comments: 1) | lasagna (Discussed changesets: 12) | Additional sources: https://www.bawsca.org/uploads/userfiles/files/2024%20State%20of%20the%20Regional%20Water%20System%20Report_Final%202024-12-05_5PM.pdf https://www.nps.gov/yose/getinvolved/hetchyproject.htm Bing Streetside commented 2025-12-08 00:43:38 UTC by lasagna ♦45 |
| 175339246 (Comments: 1) | sconner1987 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello sconner1987, and welcome to Openstreetmap! I just have an FYI about your change here - Unless "Maintenance" is the official name of this building, please don't tag it as such. You could retag the building as a shed, maybe, but pl... commented 2025-12-08 00:11:55 UTC by I-76 ♦41 |
| 174316240 (Comments: 3) | Dark_Valor (Discussed changesets: 19) | If you hadn't tuned out of the thread immediately, you'd have noticed that the general majority landed on there's no reason to remove them, and they are useful for data consumers. commented 2025-12-07 22:55:02 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175454381 (Comments: 3) | saunter (Discussed changesets: 54) | Thanks, I fixed those issues https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175639988 commented 2025-12-07 20:57:19 UTC by saunter ♦17 |
| 172981669 (Comments: 1) | ellaisabellacat (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12823859387/history has shop = smoke that was added in this edit Is it the same as shop=headshop - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=headshop ? Or the same as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/... commented 2025-12-07 20:05:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 128444727 (Comments: 1) | Linz8444 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10154905549/history has shop = home_improvement that was added in this edit Is it shop=doityourself ? If not, how it differs from shop=doityourself? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=doityou... commented 2025-12-07 20:01:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 161983358 (Comments: 2) | vojtechzaboril (Discussed changesets: 152) | Hi, yes definitely. I fixed it now. Thanks for notice. commented 2025-12-07 19:50:47 UTC by vojtechzaboril ♦225 |
| 175595624 (Comments: 1) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 7) | The node that was accidentally created was deleted in changeset 175635551 since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175635551 commented 2025-12-07 18:41:38 UTC by JakovBušić ♦17 |
| 173697375 (Comments: 2) | Dblcut3 (Discussed changesets: 21) | on further update, the building construction tag should only be used when the building actually exists and has 4 walls, near completion, so i have deleted it; the landuse=construction surrounding the site is still there and applicable. commented 2025-12-07 17:40:54 UTC by skorasaurus ♦217 |
| 175470971 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_MapObscura (Discussed changesets: 2) | Why are you adding highway=crossing nodes at intersections of sidewalks and driveways or other minor service ways? For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6907099584#map=19/34.135201/-118.009412 This is not standard on OSM, and ... commented 2025-12-07 17:11:28 UTC by CRCulver ♦204 |
| 175568670 (Comments: 2) | Apathetic_Engineer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Oh good point. I was assuming river ment commercially navigable (Calcasieu, Mississippi, Sabine River, intracostal), but I reviewed the wiki and see that I need to reduce my threshold for what a big channel would be. I’ll update it. Good tip on... commented 2025-12-07 16:09:44 UTC by Apathetic_Engineer ♦2 |
| 175605911 (Comments: 1) | Gemma Petite (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please don't remove the outlines of the building unless they have been demolished, just remove the tags that specify what the building is if that has changed. commented 2025-12-07 15:18:36 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175610983 (Comments: 5) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hey, welcome to OSM. Just FYI, we can't use Google Maps as a source. That tends to get people pretty riled up around here. Let me know if you have questions, I'm a local editor. commented 2025-12-07 10:50:16 UTC by Omnific ♦212 |
| 175547818 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted since maxheight was applied to too long segment and unnecessary split was made #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175614340 commented 2025-12-07 09:16:31 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175613418 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Extra part of the descripton: Been here many times, it's a road commented 2025-12-07 08:55:59 UTC by JasiahMaps1010 ♦3 |
| 175611110 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, welcome to OSM. This changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. Best regards, Pascal commented 2025-12-07 08:32:05 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,710 |
| 175611903 (Comments: 1) | JasiahMaps1010 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hi, welcome to OSM. This changeset should be reviewed by the local community. Thanks. Best regards, Pascal commented 2025-12-07 08:29:12 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦5,710 |
| 175591365 (Comments: 1) | VitoVejnović (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted since restriction was not set in the full extent of York road east end and unnecessary split was made #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175612773 commented 2025-12-07 08:15:23 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175589201 (Comments: 1) | VitoVejnović (Discussed changesets: 2) | Removing accidental node creation #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175612533 commented 2025-12-07 08:04:01 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175601167 (Comments: 2) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, From the website:- https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/bellevue-south-park/facilities/dogareas, it looks like leashed dogs are allowed in the park but not in play areas. Imagery suggests the playground area is still a playground. commented 2025-12-07 06:47:24 UTC by BCNorwich ♦5,015 |
| 174972076 (Comments: 1) | Akiba220 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, unless the bench is known as "Bench" you don't need to tag "name=Bench" The name key is used for the name of the feature as it is called, for example a bench could be called John Memorial's Bench. ht... commented 2025-12-07 05:54:10 UTC by akadouri ♦60 |
| 118387937 (Comments: 3) | h551w (Discussed changesets: 64) | shop=trade trade=plumbing_supplies ? commented 2025-12-07 05:46:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 171562716 (Comments: 1) | Dzertanoj (Discussed changesets: 5) | Please avoid using multipolygons unless they are really necessary. They make features harder to edit and in this case they provide no benefit. commented 2025-12-07 05:37:16 UTC by tguen ♦88 |
| 175554264 (Comments: 6) | TMil31 (Discussed changesets: 1) | It's more like the validator doesn't really highlight that error very well. commented 2025-12-07 05:23:11 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175606245 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Color values in OSM should in lower case. In general in OSM other than proper names and a few other exceptions, all tag values should be lower case. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha... commented 2025-12-07 04:40:44 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175600040 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. While your edit is not wrong, generally if a feature has a wikidata= tag then wikipedia= tag is unnecessary since it can be extracted from wikidata. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.or... commented 2025-12-07 04:34:42 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175597018 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. In this edit you moved a library node a few buildings over. Was that intentional? Also it looks like you tagged what appears to be an apartment building as a single-family house. Could you please elaborate on this change? ... commented 2025-12-07 04:30:30 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175596128 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | If you think that somebody needs to be fixed about a feature that you can't, rather than using note= tag, it's better to use fixme= tag. If you'd like you can try using https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to generate opening_hours t... commented 2025-12-07 04:28:12 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175592369 (Comments: 2) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Also while you cleaned up biz tags from the building itself, you left opening_hours= tag on it, which obviously is not necessary for an apartment building. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/c... commented 2025-12-07 04:19:34 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175514011 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. When adding facebbok info it's sufficient to use just 1 tag. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175514011 commented 2025-12-07 04:12:54 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175513391 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. You can tag this as a vacant business or use lifecycle prefix until the new biz opens. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175513391 commented 2025-12-07 04:11:47 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 174708804 (Comments: 2) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Changeset reverted to restore this POI. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175608699 commented 2025-12-07 04:05:17 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175132721 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Rather than delivery=partner, it's more correct to use delivery=yes and delivery:partner=* as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:delivery:partner --- Published using OSMC... commented 2025-12-07 04:00:01 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 172793172 (Comments: 2) | manjurawat_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | Fixed commented 2025-12-07 03:59:10 UTC by Spaghetti Monster🍝 ♦2,139 |
| 174708996 (Comments: 1) | SamosaMunch (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello. Rather than using shop=vacant, it's better to use "disused:" lifecycle prefix as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix While your change is not outright wrong, there are some that consider sho... commented 2025-12-07 03:54:52 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175568804 (Comments: 1) | masonthemapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome! try to briefly describe what you are updating in the change-set comment something like "added address tags" commented 2025-12-07 03:09:36 UTC by Fen <3 ♦9 |
| 175607816 (Comments: 1) | pootriarch (Discussed changesets: 33) | it's not clear to me whether we remove the street entirely, but i opted for just access:no for now. there are no street markings, just bollards. i didn't take note of whether the two blocks on the larkin side exist commented 2025-12-07 02:48:28 UTC by pootriarch ♦26 |
| 59365356 (Comments: 1) | Doug777 (Discussed changesets: 8) | This node is seriously in the wrong place. Was the restaurant really on the corner of Washington and Washington Court in May of 2018? I have moved it to the actual location based on on-the-ground survey. commented 2025-12-06 23:57:04 UTC by gdt ♦51 |
| 175522880 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 119) | Since this is such a short section and these are only minor informal at-grade track road connections, mostly made by by maintenance vehicles, off road vehicles, and traffic trying to take shortcuts from the frontage roads, I think leaving it as motor... commented 2025-12-06 23:53:35 UTC by Joseph R P ♦383 |
| 174997736 (Comments: 3) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 11) | When someone comments on any of your changesets, you should almost always respond, even if that answer might be "I don't know" - or if you fixed the mistakes yourself, as it helps prevent further issues on OSM and builds trust with oth... commented 2025-12-06 23:45:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 36701868 (Comments: 4) | richlv (Discussed changesets: 40) | Oh, haha, that's... 10 years ago :) Looking at my pics from that area, I visited the place on 2016-01-17. This changeset was on 2016-01-20. In the pics, I can see an infoboard there, but I cannot find a pic with infoboard contents. I mu... commented 2025-12-06 23:39:12 UTC by richlv ♦406 |
| 175573595 (Comments: 3) | InfosecSnipe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the quick reply.. Yes, I saw that you are relatively new to OSM. I don't want to discourage you from continuing with OSM if you enjoy it. You are by no means the only one who has used the horse_riding tag for other things, example: ht... commented 2025-12-06 23:34:51 UTC by Hufkratzer ♦854 |
| 119350356 (Comments: 1) | Skunkman56 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hi, i think there are some leftover untagged lanes that are not in relations from this change but I'm not sure https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175604607 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175604426 commented 2025-12-06 23:13:02 UTC by tuttiton ♦28 |
| 162189702 (Comments: 2) | K_D_R (Discussed changesets: 1) | I mean this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049366884/history/18 commented 2025-12-06 22:15:04 UTC by tuttiton ♦28 |
| 175520375 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverted because of unnecessary splits and restrictions set on part of the way not covered by a traffic sign #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175600849 commented 2025-12-06 20:52:05 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175519147 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverting west side of Sherwood Forest Road edit since split was done at the wrong crossroad #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175600107 commented 2025-12-06 20:26:26 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175517628 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverting since split was not done at the crossroad #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175599679 commented 2025-12-06 20:10:33 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175405116 (Comments: 2) | benguuuuu (Discussed changesets: 1) | I was using it to close out the line. Still new at this - relax. commented 2025-12-06 19:47:02 UTC by benguuuuu ♦1 |
| 174297077 (Comments: 1) | Steve_NC60 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Steve, Thanks for contributing to golf course mapping. We need all the help we can get. However, there are some problems with how you're mapping and I want to make sure you correct those behaviors so they don't continue int... commented 2025-12-06 19:21:12 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175415246 (Comments: 1) | stevethomp (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hi Steve, Thanks for contributing to golf course mapping. We need all the help we can get. However, there are some problems with how you're mapping and I want to make sure you correct those behaviors so they don't continue int... commented 2025-12-06 19:04:52 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175003692 (Comments: 1) | cbbcbail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for updating W Wash to reflect the recent changes. I noticed that you tagged the split sections as `highway=tertiary_link`. I changed it back to tertiary. Link is only when the road connections to a lower classified road. commented 2025-12-06 15:46:43 UTC by hobbesvsboyle ♦17 |
| 175494155 (Comments: 2) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 2) | Accidental node relocation made, node change reverted #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175587293 commented 2025-12-06 13:57:08 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175500501 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 3) | Whole Hutton Street should have been restricted, there is a sign from the north at Granville Drive. Reverting because of unnecessary split #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175583406 commented 2025-12-06 12:18:52 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 144918050 (Comments: 1) | Max Ogden (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402438943/history - surface=5 ? was it supposed to be lanes=5 ? commented 2025-12-06 10:07:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 166990430 (Comments: 3) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 21) | > ref by itself is mysterious, so why not name it better? no idea who had this idea, maybe it makes more sense fot UK native speakers? Either way, it has got established and widely used. BTW, there are sillier ones, see https://wiki.open... commented 2025-12-06 09:33:21 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 167706450 (Comments: 3) | PropertyVIEW® (Discussed changesets: 31) | Instead of stuffing city into the name= tag, you are more than welcome to use "branch=*" tag to distinguish individual locations of a chain/franchise/whatever. --- Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2025-12-06 07:58:33 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175557979 (Comments: 1) | Fhacker (Discussed changesets: 1) | please make sure golf course areas don't overlap in the future. fairways shouldn't intersect tees or greens for example. commented 2025-12-06 07:48:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175475455 (Comments: 1) | Paytonhenry04 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Payton, I've reverted this changeset as there are dozen of problem edits that would take more effort to fix than to apply correctly. There were a ton of golf objects that were sloppily overlapping other objects (fairways and tee... commented 2025-12-06 07:03:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175436008 (Comments: 2) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hello MxxCon, Thanks for reaching out. Yes, I’ll look into getting my set-up updated to a more recent JOSM version. Happy Mapping! commented 2025-12-06 06:42:59 UTC by rajdhani ♦7 |
| 175564707 (Comments: 1) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 4) | It looks like you may've applied English Bayou to one or two segments it probably shouldn't go on. I would consult the USGS GNIS domestic name search map for river names. When you pin a stream from the search results it will show the mouth ... commented 2025-12-06 04:12:19 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦11 |
| 171931503 (Comments: 1) | niartenyaw (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, this seems like a mistake? The diet:vegan/vegetarian=only tags are for places that *only* serve vegan/vegetarian food, respectively. In other words, diet:vegan=only is for a place that does not serve any animal products at all, and diet:vegetaria... commented 2025-12-06 02:29:36 UTC by Legimet ♦1 |
| 175564690 (Comments: 1) | midget sub (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi, I reverted this changeset because there is no longer a path there. The imagery isn't up to date but there is a new computer science building that just opened this fall that connects to the right side of the old computer science building, so ... commented 2025-12-06 02:13:01 UTC by jm428 ♦21 |
| 175561564 (Comments: 3) | Beinardus (Discussed changesets: 5) | Aah. Yeah, row buildings can be hard to tell apart sometime. A good context clue in the US and western Canada (especially railroad boom towns like this one built ~1880-1930) is that the tightest density tends to be near the railroad tracks, and st... commented 2025-12-06 01:48:49 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 5100894 (Comments: 3) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 97) | Also 15 years ago...wow, that would have been one of my earliest Oklahoma edits... commented 2025-12-06 01:35:32 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175569514 (Comments: 1) | synthfi (Discussed changesets: 3) | also changed a ford into a bridge as that was obvious from imagery commented 2025-12-06 01:03:48 UTC by synthfi ♦7 |
| 173867375 (Comments: 4) | S-zation (Discussed changesets: 33) | Nice - thank you for your additions to the map! commented 2025-12-05 23:35:04 UTC by S-zation ♦118 |
| 157479345 (Comments: 2) | Hb- (Discussed changesets: 112) | It was a best guess. commented 2025-12-05 22:18:55 UTC by Hb- ♦308 |
| 175566475 (Comments: 2) | Thunderhead380 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also now OSM has it correctly marked, private access will be more clear, and routing engines will not route people that way any longer if they are using OSM data. But it is NOT correctly mapped on Google Maps, they have it as a road. People a... commented 2025-12-05 22:18:19 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175526751 (Comments: 1) | EBurgDeflocker (Discussed changesets: 1) | It doesn't seem likely that the Flock device is in the middle of the intersection. Can you move it to a more exact position? Look for pole shadows to help determine what it is physically. --- Publish... commented 2025-12-05 21:37:34 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 174039460 (Comments: 1) | mbeyerle (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10205355086/history has bicycle:repair = yes that was added in this edit service:bicycle:repair is much more common way of expressing the same info as one from bicycle:repair key. Would you be fine with ch... commented 2025-12-05 21:12:32 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175558349 (Comments: 1) | osmcrsdrv (Discussed changesets: 1) | This appears to be centered in a driveway. What's the camera mounted on? I might be able to better locate it. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175558349 commented 2025-12-05 18:55:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 128706585 (Comments: 3) | salisburymistake (Discussed changesets: 13) | thanks! I was guessing that unit conversion may be root cause, but I was only guessing commented 2025-12-05 17:40:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175555043 (Comments: 1) | UEisemann (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, why did you split these highways? That only makes them harder to edit. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175556616 commented 2025-12-05 16:55:14 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦140 |
| 175174333 (Comments: 1) | SC_AE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, happened upon your edits, and I noticed a couple areas where the farmland extends through forest, which seems questionable. (there is landuse=orchard if they're fruit trees) Hoping you can be more careful about this, especially in places whe... commented 2025-12-05 16:38:09 UTC by neuhausr ♦338 |
| 88899137 (Comments: 1) | nmjwx (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I happened upon your edit, which created a beach entirely within the body of water. As I read the wiki, natural=beach should be the water's edge. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach Sand flats exposed at low tide would be t... commented 2025-12-05 16:27:45 UTC by neuhausr ♦338 |
| 174712131 (Comments: 3) | Trail_Caretaker (Discussed changesets: 37) | Thank you. In this case the issues beyond the size of the changeset (it's HUGE) are: - Your description. It needs to be much more specific. - You mapped a trail (way ID 1451006980) wrong. What you mapped does not exist in reality. Plea... commented 2025-12-05 15:29:04 UTC by c0nsumer ♦12 |
| 137989387 (Comments: 3) | Shawn Riley (Discussed changesets: 2) | Ah interesting, thanks for checking. I've updated the road name commented 2025-12-05 15:28:21 UTC by rivermont ♦228 |
| 161614394 (Comments: 1) | aedbauer (Discussed changesets: 10) | Be sure to watch all tags when changing things... your redone Cimarron Turnpike eastbound onramp was tagged as going to Hallet and Jennings as OK 99... commented 2025-12-05 14:57:06 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 145720321 (Comments: 1) | Constance-IRG (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11471939560/history has reference = LB101 that was added in this edit maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref would fit? ref= is widely used for references commented 2025-12-05 14:28:05 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 126798425 (Comments: 1) | PCarew_EG (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/118127518/history has shop = crystal that was added in this edit shop=crystal ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openst... commented 2025-12-05 12:01:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 82368469 (Comments: 1) | EricRz512 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397729037/history has shop = Pizzeria that was added in this edit shop=Pizzeria ? Is it amenity=fast_food cuisine=pizza or amenity=restaurant cuisine=pizza by any chance? Or are they selling pizza not ready... commented 2025-12-05 08:12:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 109048711 (Comments: 2) | Paul Grossman (Discussed changesets: 2) | Just to follow up, I don't think "Unknown Building" would be a good name for a building you don't know the type of or don't know the name of. If you don't know what type of building it is or don't know the building&... commented 2025-12-05 04:13:31 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 164904625 (Comments: 1) | Justin1234 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Good commented 2025-12-05 03:34:29 UTC by 13 mG ♦1 |
| 173727957 (Comments: 1) | Isopycnic (Discussed changesets: 16) | Hello, why did you 'change type' back on this way? Railroad does not exist here today commented 2025-12-05 03:32:06 UTC by rivermont ♦228 |
| 174165252 (Comments: 1) | CamelCityMapping (Discussed changesets: 6) | Please be careful about just clicking the buttons in iD editor. The entirety of Bent Creek Road is not a bridge. commented 2025-12-05 03:21:02 UTC by rivermont ♦228 |
| 175517961 (Comments: 3) | Apathetic_Engineer (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yeah that'll definitely be the end state, though keeping it separate with landuse=construction may be appropriate for the time being. commented 2025-12-05 03:10:12 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦11 |
| 175468928 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/19103 commented 2025-12-05 02:52:25 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175464170 (Comments: 6) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 15) | Okay, I took your advice and visited this area. What I found is a trail exactly where it was expected. (I'm talking about osm.org/way/526531575) The trail was visible enough that I had no problem running the whole thing back and forth, wi... commented 2025-12-05 02:14:40 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175471716 (Comments: 2) | Marcus Batson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you! I wasn't sure how to resolve the crossing warning but your information is helpful. commented 2025-12-05 02:00:43 UTC by Marcus Batson ♦1 |
| 175518451 (Comments: 1) | 0101010 (Discussed changesets: 1) | The link doesn't work on my end. commented 2025-12-05 01:32:15 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦140 |
| 175426606 (Comments: 2) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 12) | Agreed, but this one was a duplicate node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9155415177/ commented 2025-12-05 01:09:26 UTC by ICT_maps ♦9 |
| 175504464 (Comments: 1) | brookwalshy (Discussed changesets: 1) | The Q key will auto square building corners for you. It'll help you make nicer looking buildings. commented 2025-12-04 23:19:01 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦87 |
| 175467192 (Comments: 6) | PeterK2003 (Discussed changesets: 1) | PeterK2003, there is no legal basis for you to request the deletion of accurate data from our database. You might just as well request your driveway be deleted from Google imagery or from your county's GIS database. The fact that your driveway i... commented 2025-12-04 23:12:49 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,493 |
| 162268157 (Comments: 11) | End0fLine (Discussed changesets: 11) | Just added a description about the bus loop on the service road ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580976575 ) commented 2025-12-04 22:02:24 UTC by TheNightRider ♦35 |
| 175241111 (Comments: 3) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | The grey shading shows the area of the bridge. When you look a imagery you see https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=175241111#map=20/40.9333128/-73.7599364 , which doesn't correspond to the co-ordinates you mention? Where d... commented 2025-12-04 21:58:52 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦33,229 |
| 175454503 (Comments: 1) | Benny21815 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hi Benny, We've discussed this with you several times in the past. You are deleting valid map objects that belong to relations and are recreating the objects (fairways typically) from scratch leaving broken multipolygon definitions around... commented 2025-12-04 21:58:32 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 174565044 (Comments: 2) | dvlpmnt (Discussed changesets: 21) | its in the description: sentinel2 imagery commented 2025-12-04 20:56:03 UTC by dvlpmnt ♦5 |
| 175518201 (Comments: 1) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Surveyed with video capture commented 2025-12-04 20:44:19 UTC by I-76 ♦41 |
| 175453704 (Comments: 1) | Agent300 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. In this edit you also dragged intersection node a few houses over. I fixed this. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175453704 commented 2025-12-04 20:37:47 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175461607 (Comments: 1) | Agent300 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. When mapping features please be careful when panning the map around. In this edit you seemed to accidentally dragged a road a few blocks over. I'll fix this, but in the future, please be pay attention on the changeset submission... commented 2025-12-04 20:27:52 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,466 |
| 175469289 (Comments: 1) | JettJohnsonSFNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | driveways should be tagged as highway=service +service=driveway. Can you correct? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175469289 commented 2025-12-04 20:23:29 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175469051 (Comments: 1) | JettJohnsonSFNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | The best way is to just put a barrier= node on the way to prevent routers from use it as a thoughfare. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175469051 commented 2025-12-04 20:22:09 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175468967 (Comments: 1) | JettJohnsonSFNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | That appears to be just a service (driveway) than a track. I made the change, let me know if you disagree. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175468967 commented 2025-12-04 20:20:46 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175459622 (Comments: 1) | JettJohnsonSFNL (Discussed changesets: 4) | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175459622 commented 2025-12-04 20:14:36 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175458193 (Comments: 1) | wtseo (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: the node with tag barrier= is not needed since you added the fence way --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175458193 commented 2025-12-04 20:11:54 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175457938 (Comments: 1) | wtseo (Discussed changesets: 2) | #TIP: the addr=* is not needed since the building is tagged with an address. Router will take you to the closes way to the address. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175457938 ... commented 2025-12-04 20:10:35 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175511804 (Comments: 1) | N0bodyInParticular (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thanks for making change on the map. If a building isn't there anymore, you can delete it instead of changing the name like this. If there's construction happening (or another building in its place), feel free to map it to the be... commented 2025-12-04 20:05:29 UTC by iandees ♦758 |
| 175470518 (Comments: 1) | Murali3 (Discussed changesets: 17) | does the address for this building have Southwest 26th Street or Southwest 25th Court as the road (addr:street) of the address, aka what is the addr:street of the address? Just adding addr:housenumber is not enough as it is not a full address. commented 2025-12-04 19:10:21 UTC by Udarian ♦537 |
| 175512498 (Comments: 1) | traveleditor (Discussed changesets: 49) | thank you! commented 2025-12-04 18:55:13 UTC by mbela ♦6 |
| 175504367 (Comments: 1) | traveleditor (Discussed changesets: 49) | This update should be added as an 'alt_name', rather than the change of the 'name' or 'name:en'. commented 2025-12-04 18:47:14 UTC by mbela ♦6 |
| 175257591 (Comments: 2) | 01345790 (Discussed changesets: 88) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance I'm curious I don't see anywhere where it says anything about lowercase and upper case. And then another osm is adding gantry when there is no mention of it. Can you ex... commented 2025-12-04 18:23:36 UTC by 01345790 ♦2 |
| 175487318 (Comments: 1) | AllTech Construction (Discussed changesets: 1) | I reverted this edit. You replaced a nearby highway with a barrier. Please, do the built-in tutorial and try again. Additionally, google maps cannot be used as a source for edits to OSM. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175511189 commented 2025-12-04 18:23:28 UTC by citrula ♦974 |
| 175455511 (Comments: 2) | KelsonV (Discussed changesets: 8) | Thanks for catching that! I must have just clicked the wrong number of times. Yeah, none of the residential/residential intersections in the grid between 190th and Robinson and between Aviation and Inglewood has islands, just some of the bigge... commented 2025-12-04 17:53:31 UTC by KelsonV ♦7 |
| 175465275 (Comments: 1) | Leo Z Huang (Discussed changesets: 1) | I have changed the way to a drive way rather than a residential road, thank you for improving the map! commented 2025-12-04 16:30:30 UTC by Fen <3 ♦9 |
| 174996289 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 11) | It looks like you edited or adjusted the commercial area in this changeset rather than just "Add" it since you already added it. commented 2025-12-04 15:10:17 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 174357801 (Comments: 1) | Tre_brock (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thanks for working on this area. I removed the name of this school area, see comment on changeset 175498800. commented 2025-12-04 14:54:13 UTC by jhuang97 ♦13 |
| 175472078 (Comments: 1) | tkotnala_lyft (Discussed changesets: 9) | Your spelling could use some work, as you misspelled "left|through|through;right". --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175472078 commented 2025-12-04 14:15:35 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 168409851 (Comments: 2) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 20) | Hi Spaghetti Monster🍝! My name is Sumit, and I’m a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft and Lalit’s Teammate. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. I apologize for the mistake — you are absolutely correct that the ro... commented 2025-12-04 14:00:24 UTC by skumarchandela_lyft ♦14 |
| 175458854 (Comments: 2) | u2IdbX51OyQ8NLmRN3niHFs5rGDy6x1ge1e2l69B8RnhdhNgy (Discussed changesets: 2) | my bad. edits were made in CoMaps App and doesn't allow control on how many of the changes upload at a time. I'll try to space them out more and see if it helps commented 2025-12-04 13:35:52 UTC by u2IdbX51OyQ8NLmRN3niHFs5rGDy6x1ge1e2l69B8RnhdhNgy ♦1 |
| 175493886 (Comments: 1) | MxW (Discussed changesets: 1) | As per* commented 2025-12-04 13:28:07 UTC by MxW ♦1 |
| 175492024 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 173) | The node that was accidentally created was deleted in changeset 175492108 since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175492108 commented 2025-12-04 12:54:17 UTC by TinPetreković ♦188 |
| 175452090 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverting because the whole street should have been tagged with truck restrictions #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175487886 commented 2025-12-04 11:44:07 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175449318 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverting because the whole street should have been tagged with truck restrictions #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175487792 commented 2025-12-04 11:42:25 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 127378946 (Comments: 1) | The_Cre8r (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077810948/history has roof:shape = pitched that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here? Or roof:shape=gabled? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape=pitched commented 2025-12-04 10:48:36 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 137467072 (Comments: 1) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846884937/history has roof:shape = pitched that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=skillion was intended here? Or roof:shape=gabled? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:roof:shape=pitched commented 2025-12-04 10:48:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 107459459 (Comments: 1) | Scott McKee (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4768838 if you are still in this area? commented 2025-12-04 10:23:00 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175460176 (Comments: 1) | WarrenJWells (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, thank you for your effort to map cycling infrastructure. Unfortunately, (or more like fortunately, in this case) these protected bikeways/cycle tracks were already mapped. I would suggest taking a look at the "CyclOSM" layer under &quo... commented 2025-12-04 09:27:45 UTC by oba510 ♦271 |
| 175381365 (Comments: 1) | 44mpr (Discussed changesets: 2) | regarding the replacing of "St." with "Saint" in place names, please see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/st-stephen-new-brunswick-or-saint-stephen/130485 and participate in that discussion before you repeat this kind of edit... commented 2025-12-04 08:56:55 UTC by woodpeck ♦2,493 |
| 164057264 (Comments: 2) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 11) | I corrected the direction of the Gateway Lane Northeast one-way roads in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175475244 by clicking on the "Change Direction" button in the "One Way" field of the ways in iD editor. commented 2025-12-04 07:05:47 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 70402050 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 124) | Hey, I'm curious why you expanded the name. Isn't the signed name just "Molly Moon's" or perhaps "Molly Moon's Ice Cream" and that other information, especially the Columbia City location name, best included in... commented 2025-12-04 06:56:56 UTC by pwbriggs ♦100 |
| 175356024 (Comments: 2) | JakovBušić (Discussed changesets: 7) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175455246 commented 2025-12-04 06:45:43 UTC by JakovBušić ♦17 |
| 175343961 (Comments: 2) | Swihail (Discussed changesets: 31) | Hi dmjab13, Thank you for the message. Happy mapping! commented 2025-12-04 04:51:13 UTC by Swihail ♦34 |
| 175466788 (Comments: 1) | Not George (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is the camera located on the telephone pole on the northwest corner of the intersection? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175466788 commented 2025-12-04 03:14:32 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175451719 (Comments: 2) | SD Mapman (Discussed changesets: 31) | Thanks! Missing the plain dirt areas out by Mirror (no good tag) and I still haven't got around to doing the landuse out by Cox. commented 2025-12-04 01:36:37 UTC by SD Mapman ♦48 |
| 175410009 (Comments: 3) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 97) | Reverting those changesets was done to restore names incorrectly stripped from cycleways and sidewalks. commented 2025-12-04 01:18:52 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 147554944 (Comments: 11) | RussNelson (Discussed changesets: 33) | True, but that is beside the point. commented 2025-12-04 01:16:01 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 175425275 (Comments: 1) | DaveTheHorse123 (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names like Garage, 516... Instead just use the appropriate tags --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175425275 commented 2025-12-04 01:03:14 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175465201 (Comments: 1) | muzics547 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Your comment should not be “PUNK!”, but instead should describe what you did. commented 2025-12-04 00:38:41 UTC by Coel312 ♦1 |
| 175426507 (Comments: 1) | Walleyflock (Discussed changesets: 2) | This might be an accidental remap of the camera on 300 West? There doesn't seem to be a camera here. commented 2025-12-04 00:02:15 UTC by HashFerret ♦10 |
| 175465769 (Comments: 1) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 169) | Also fixed some gaps in boundary relations along the river. commented 2025-12-03 22:12:37 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦591 |
| 175411077 (Comments: 2) | mdeveney (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Yushclay, Yes, I'm with the Pala GIS Department and I'm trying to update the reservation boundary using JOSM, which I'm clearly still new to. I will get the boundary relations sorted out asap. commented 2025-12-03 22:09:01 UTC by mdeveney ♦1 |
| 166179048 (Comments: 1) | quincylvania (Discussed changesets: 65) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444208347 is a segment of a river, not a flowline that only exists for theoretical purposes in OSM. For example, Mobridge is on Lake Oahe but it’s also on the Missouri River. commented 2025-12-03 22:08:58 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦591 |
| 174836636 (Comments: 2) | VLD299 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello KelsonV, I apologize for any inconvenience, and I’ll make sure to use the more current bing imagery for this area going forwards. Thank you for your help! -VLD299 / Conor commented 2025-12-03 22:04:34 UTC by VLD299 ♦6 |
| 174793353 (Comments: 2) | Rwags (Discussed changesets: 2) | It's right inside the fence looking down the road. Road T's there. commented 2025-12-03 21:58:42 UTC by Rwags ♦1 |
| 175430616 (Comments: 2) | maddog107 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry about that. I did not see your edit commented 2025-12-03 21:33:58 UTC by maddog107 ♦2 |
| 175461271 (Comments: 1) | Wyatt Sibilia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists o... commented 2025-12-03 21:14:54 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175463304 (Comments: 1) | Sam Omiotek (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your object, please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:aeroway. commented 2025-12-03 21:10:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 13994242 (Comments: 7) | RussNelson (Discussed changesets: 33) | Many people disagree with that claim. commented 2025-12-03 21:08:48 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 174568846 (Comments: 2) | RussNelson (Discussed changesets: 33) | Tracks in the pavement 200' to the south, the shape of the building, and the obvious railbed going north eventually joining to active tracks. commented 2025-12-03 20:56:04 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 134557696 (Comments: 4) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 204) | Given rails poking through the pavement 300' to the north and 100' to the south, you'd think it would be obvious that this is an abandoned railway. It was obvious to me when I was there. Do I need to post photos? commented 2025-12-03 20:47:44 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 130584222 (Comments: 2) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 204) | Right here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/PMQAA9Sq44pfkXH78 commented 2025-12-03 18:42:19 UTC by RussNelson ♦51 |
| 170083909 (Comments: 3) | arichnad (Discussed changesets: 20) | and thanks for fixing it! have a nice mapping day! commented 2025-12-03 18:37:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175451635 (Comments: 1) | Anticom76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This camera is still very into the intersection, what's it mounted on? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175451635 commented 2025-12-03 18:22:38 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 160954577 (Comments: 2) | Ianmia (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes they sell carports, sheds, and barns. commented 2025-12-03 18:12:56 UTC by Ianmia ♦1 |
| 175379564 (Comments: 3) | maddog107 (Discussed changesets: 2) | My bad. I initially left it broken so you could see the problem but then as I was fixing other errors, I came back to it again and not realizing it was one I mentioned to you, I went ahead and fixed it again. I'll let you know if I see another e... commented 2025-12-03 18:03:30 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175416057 (Comments: 2) | I-76 (Discussed changesets: 17) | well, driveways and footpaths commented 2025-12-03 16:36:52 UTC by I-76 ♦41 |
| 175312185 (Comments: 1) | OEleven (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists o... commented 2025-12-03 16:06:52 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175453132 (Comments: 1) | TinPetreković (Discussed changesets: 173) | The node that was accidentally created has been removed in changeset 175453288 since it served no real purpose. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175453288 commented 2025-12-03 16:04:58 UTC by TinPetreković ♦188 |
| 175449542 (Comments: 1) | KCMapterpiece (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Some of the features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it ... commented 2025-12-03 15:38:49 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175451873 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Removed truck restrictions from the middle the street and left only on both ends because there aren't any sings from smaller roads #OptimoRoute osm.org/changeset/175452090 commented 2025-12-03 15:37:03 UTC by JakovRajić ♦2 |
| 175451306 (Comments: 1) | bat fragrance (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is that loop of streets four different streets? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175451306 commented 2025-12-03 15:22:12 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175429657 (Comments: 1) | meagullseagull (Discussed changesets: 4) | On the circular path you tagged as a footway with motor_vehicle=designated...is this an alleyway? If so, the motor_vehicle tag could be dropped and highway=service, service=alley would be a better fit. --- ... commented 2025-12-03 15:19:01 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175429164 (Comments: 1) | meagullseagull (Discussed changesets: 4) | It's best to avoid abbreviations like "Rd" when possible. Computers are notoriously bad at expanding abbreviations but can easily create them if desired. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Publishe... commented 2025-12-03 15:02:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175423488 (Comments: 1) | Anticom76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This appears to be between the two eastbound lanes of the street, centered in front of a driveway. Could you provide additional information that could help us position this more accurately? --- Published... commented 2025-12-03 14:58:19 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175423428 (Comments: 1) | Anticom76 (Discussed changesets: 3) | This looks to be about 1 lane into the northeast corner of a large intersection. Could you describe the location of the camera so we could more accurately position it on the map? --- Published using OSMC... commented 2025-12-03 14:57:24 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 141481625 (Comments: 1) | cmitchell (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209167158/history has roof:levels = hipped that was added in this edit Maybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape commented 2025-12-03 14:22:18 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175357876 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Removed truck restrictions from a part of the way because there isn't a sign for traffic going north-west #OptimoRoute osm.org/changeset/175446344 commented 2025-12-03 13:17:45 UTC by JakovRajić ♦2 |
| 175420773 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Reverting maxspeed tag since not confirmed by a proper sign and not currently in the scope of the project #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443719 commented 2025-12-03 12:04:01 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175420690 (Comments: 1) | Ante Žunić (Discussed changesets: 5) | Revering maxspeed tag since not confirmed by a proper sign and not currently in the scope of the project #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443671 commented 2025-12-03 12:03:16 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175417093 (Comments: 1) | IvanaŠokčević (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted because a traffic sign which is mandatory was not found in integrated street imagery #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443378 commented 2025-12-03 11:54:58 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175358431 (Comments: 1) | JakovRajić (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted because a traffic sign which is mandatory was not found in integrated street imagery #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175443222 commented 2025-12-03 11:50:41 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175417041 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverted because a traffic sign which is mandatory was not found in integrated street imagery #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175442896 commented 2025-12-03 11:40:04 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175413287 (Comments: 1) | MirkoKunac (Discussed changesets: 3) | Reverting because a node was moved #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175442766 commented 2025-12-03 11:35:58 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 172291111 (Comments: 2) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 20) | Thanks, I didn't know this map! commented 2025-12-03 09:10:57 UTC by cuzi ♦136 |
| 175414887 (Comments: 1) | Alitzel Razon (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/54484753 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings. I moved the node back to the original position. commented 2025-12-03 08:37:03 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 175417227 (Comments: 1) | SimonaHudoletnjak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Change undone in a later changeset #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175417370 commented 2025-12-03 08:19:43 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175422469 (Comments: 1) | ohdeera (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Did you see the https://www.osm.org/note/5076700? commented 2025-12-03 08:11:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 175423731 (Comments: 1) | Ironfractal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! Please don't add any shop as landuse and name. Please paint the building and add the shop (with additional description) as node. commented 2025-12-03 08:09:10 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 162708482 (Comments: 3) | pwbriggs (Discussed changesets: 15) | yes, I am pretty sure it is have a nice day! commented 2025-12-03 08:05:29 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 175366166 (Comments: 1) | lotharben333 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Another problem is when you draw the fairway and it crisscrosses over other elements (like the bunker near the green). You should share every node at the boundary between the two (if you aren't leaving a gap). Some helpful information can be gle... commented 2025-12-03 04:23:41 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 175367901 (Comments: 1) | lotharben333 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Lothar, Please don't delete a valid fairway like this only to recreate a nearly identical fairway moments later. It's best to keep the history of the fairway and all of its previous versions for people to review and understand why... commented 2025-12-03 04:18:32 UTC by b-jazz ♦772 |
| 171806395 (Comments: 1) | CowCowManThingit (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Thanks for adding all this lovely stuff. You had one side stream segment that was pointed upstream, I fixed it up but something to pay attention to for sure. Happy mapping! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429116693/history#map... commented 2025-12-03 03:26:52 UTC by watmildon ♦261 |
| 19560421 (Comments: 1) | yakingman (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2588622274/history has shop = hardwood_lumber that was added in this edit shop=hardwood_lumber ? Why not shop=trade trade=timber ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade commented 2025-12-03 01:08:25 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 172984088 (Comments: 2) | Skyryk (Discussed changesets: 1) | This was indeed a mistake. Thank you for catching that. Will correct. commented 2025-12-02 23:58:32 UTC by Skyryk ♦1 |
| 175419048 (Comments: 1) | SimonaHudoletnjak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted because of a wrong tag used and also the restriction was not confirmed by a road sign #OptimoRoute https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175423262 commented 2025-12-02 23:05:21 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175417896 (Comments: 1) | SimonaHudoletnjak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fixed tags missed by a team member Fixes in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175423140 commented 2025-12-02 23:00:55 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175417491 (Comments: 1) | SimonaHudoletnjak (Discussed changesets: 4) | Fixed missing tags caused by another team member. Fixes in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175422878 commented 2025-12-02 22:57:22 UTC by MarkoŠatrak ♦59 |
| 175385158 (Comments: 1) | Levanter66 (Discussed changesets: 1) | If you check the counties parcel map, https://www.skagitcounty.net/Maps/iMap/?mapjs=parcel this road is named. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#National_Forest_Road_System suggests how to add FR1570 as a ref tag. Can yo... commented 2025-12-02 22:09:05 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 174827683 (Comments: 1) | animebirder (Discussed changesets: 13) | I believe this is actually a river - per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream a stream can be jumped across by an "active, able-bodied person". By this definition, very few streams are visible on aerial imagery, and con... commented 2025-12-02 21:24:28 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦27 |
| 175417427 (Comments: 2) | meagullseagull (Discussed changesets: 4) | The newly constructed building (behind tribal affairs building) was originally intended to serve only as a bereavement center, but it is now also rented out for events such as birthdays, graduations, and weddings in addition to funeral services. The ... commented 2025-12-02 21:00:47 UTC by meagullseagull ♦1 |
| 167619871 (Comments: 1) | geogidon (Discussed changesets: 37) | Actually, I believe this to be a river. A stream is small enough in width that it can be jumped across by an "active, able-bodied person", which does not fit the definition of almost any named waterway in Texas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.o... commented 2025-12-02 19:19:49 UTC by kaleidoscopica ♦27 |
| 175163342 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 3) | please try and keep edits to one state or region commented 2025-12-02 19:17:31 UTC by dmjab13 ♦53 |
| 175162411 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 3) | please try and keep edits to one region or state commented 2025-12-02 19:17:13 UTC by dmjab13 ♦53 |
| 175346891 (Comments: 1) | cedotix (Discussed changesets: 3) | please try to keep edits in one state or region commented 2025-12-02 19:12:32 UTC by dmjab13 ♦53 |
| 175390776 (Comments: 1) | growandglowagency (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Please only draw in existing objects and facts. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-02 19:01:24 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 174539054 (Comments: 2) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yeah, I'm debating on what to do here, but I'm leaning on removing trunk tags from Pacific Hwy east of Barnett Ave and tag the rest of Barnett Ave and Lytton St to Rosecrans. I did have a DM with the suggestion to connect the trunk roads a... commented 2025-12-02 17:50:13 UTC by Yushclay ♦13 |
| 175385606 (Comments: 3) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 11) | Yeah, I guess I went too far for this one. I'll undo it. The logic I was going with was expressway being mostly controlled access with and little to no contact with the opposing direction outside of intersections. commented 2025-12-02 17:33:35 UTC by Yushclay ♦13 |
| 174311316 (Comments: 2) | Yushclay (Discussed changesets: 11) | Ah yeah, I tagged that one as trunk before I learned about the 2022 Hwy Classification Guidelines. I'll undo this one. commented 2025-12-02 17:27:39 UTC by Yushclay ♦13 |
| 175364283 (Comments: 1) | MFT1330 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Please don't use the name tag field for descriptions. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions commented 2025-12-02 16:38:59 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 174308000 (Comments: 1) | Dark_Valor (Discussed changesets: 19) | Please don't remove names from sidewalks. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174308000 commented 2025-12-02 16:17:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 174555047 (Comments: 1) | Dark_Valor (Discussed changesets: 19) | This has been a diverging diamond interchange for a few years now. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175409773 commented 2025-12-02 16:15:19 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175404844 (Comments: 1) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 17) | Please make sure the data you're updating against is actually still valid and relevant. This has been a diverging diamond interchange for years at this point. It's generally inadvisable to map places you haven't been and aren&#... commented 2025-12-02 16:10:15 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175399964 (Comments: 1) | Lacetransport (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello Hello, welcome to OSM. The features you removed in this changeset are valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it ex... commented 2025-12-02 15:03:10 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175000731 (Comments: 2) | lapsly (Discussed changesets: 1) | This node was not in this location, pointed in this direction. Editing is not currently functional on the Deflock app. Node was deleted and replaced. commented 2025-12-02 14:33:12 UTC by lapsly ♦1 |
| 174961895 (Comments: 3) | nickvet419 (Discussed changesets: 78) | Thanks! commented 2025-12-02 14:29:17 UTC by RidecoBrad ♦4 |
| 175404173 (Comments: 1) | CensuraIFLA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted as this building still exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175405154 commented 2025-12-02 14:24:11 UTC by ion_chi ♦45 |
| 175377025 (Comments: 1) | CensuraIFLA (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CensuraIFLA, You changed the whole building. I've reverted this change here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175405191 If you want to add an office for the ALA, it should be a new node commented 2025-12-02 14:23:30 UTC by ion_chi ♦45 |
| 170731381 (Comments: 2) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 37) | Fixed, typo commented 2025-12-02 13:45:19 UTC by DUGA ♦550 |
| 166626472 (Comments: 1) | KFCmenomonie (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello! You used surface=gravel= on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21474224/history Have you maybe meant surface=gravel ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some obj... commented 2025-12-02 10:25:56 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |
| 174521499 (Comments: 1) | DetailedMaps4Fun (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, Please be sure to only map turn restrictions when they are actually signed on the ground. Some of the restrictions you've created look like you just figured that cars shouldn't do that, but this is usually not enough to add a ... commented 2025-12-02 08:52:13 UTC by ZLima12 ♦285 |
| 175373780 (Comments: 1) | Samwise_Gamgee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please move the node inside a building and add more information (like religion, address,..) to the church. commented 2025-12-02 08:38:39 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 175386176 (Comments: 1) | Hazard K9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between a name and a description. If you need more information (and cannot find any examples or ask anyone else), please visit our wiki at https://wiki.osm.org. I have reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-02 08:25:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 175387419 (Comments: 1) | Jennifer Kim Dermatology (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! Sorry, but business entries without addresses are not in line with OSM. Please add the street and house number, or we will have to mark this as SPAM. I have now reverted your changes. commented 2025-12-02 08:22:14 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,425 |
| 113457771 (Comments: 1) | dougb0 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just an FYI, you could have tagged the former Chickahominy Drive way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59149099) as old_name=Chickahominy Drive and then renamed it to Givens Lane, rather than merging the former Chickahominy Drive way into its adjoin... commented 2025-12-02 06:51:49 UTC by Frank Peng ♦46 |
| 175382182 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 119) | Did I say, "Corrected road direction"? I meant that I re-aligned road geometry based on... Blah, blah, blah, it's too long and verbose to list here. commented 2025-12-02 02:52:05 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦140 |
| 175333356 (Comments: 1) | Kerry Irons (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the fix here, Kerry, I had not noticed this. commented 2025-12-02 02:17:57 UTC by stevea ♦315 |
| 171713070 (Comments: 1) | Matthew Grund (Discussed changesets: 26) | Hi, you probably know this already, but be careful about mapping stop lines as stop signs because traffic lights often have stop lines too, I noticed you had some stop signs at the intersection of Morgan Rd and Piper Rd commented 2025-12-02 01:55:46 UTC by jm428 ♦21 |
| 175327787 (Comments: 1) | sbodapati (Discussed changesets: 1) | #TIP: street names are spelled out in OSM because software has a hard time with abbreviations. But the rest looks great. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. --- Published using OSMCha: https... commented 2025-12-02 01:16:21 UTC by Glassman ♦5,644 |
| 175323316 (Comments: 2) | Marv8125 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, yes the deletions were intentional, I'm new to this and I might be trying to be to precise. I like how easy it is to get started. Thanks for checking. commented 2025-12-02 00:02:44 UTC by Marv8125 ♦1 |
| 160187400 (Comments: 10) | Mashin (Discussed changesets: 41) | Generally, in cases like the I-91/CT-159 interchange, I feel that it is better to not change the classification of the connecting road (Meadow Road in this case). The ground truth is that CT-159 is the primary road, and you have to get off onto a sid... commented 2025-12-01 21:21:59 UTC by ZLima12 ♦285 |
| 175338357 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 198) | I've fixed this in changeset #175376236 https://osmcha.org/changesets/175376236 as well as refined the Price's Fork eastbound positioning to better align with reliable imagery and reduce the skew in that direction, as well as using `placeme... commented 2025-12-01 21:08:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦55 |
| 175368068 (Comments: 1) | Ebo9 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Comparing to Bing and Esri aerial imagery, it appears that you have moved City Hall from the location both aerial imageries agree is the base of the building, to the outline of the roof of the building, and flattened the round side of the building. ... commented 2025-12-01 17:20:38 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 175366594 (Comments: 2) | Ebo9 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Yes, they expanded the parking lot to accommodate more visitors for the new Aquatics center commented 2025-12-01 17:12:36 UTC by Ebo9 ♦1 |
| 175335851 (Comments: 7) | NoneyaBidness (Discussed changesets: 2) | OSM is all volunteer and if you are not interested in taking on the work to update the trails no worries. But we ask for you not to removed existing work that others before you have done without replacing it with more accurate information. Thi... commented 2025-12-01 17:04:31 UTC by MassCartog ♦255 |
| 175342587 (Comments: 1) | OrdinaryScarlett (Discussed changesets: 51) | Ways were intentionally segmented to support speed reduction zones during long-term track maintenance. Stop time prediction accuracy will be less accurate with these merges. --- Published using OSMCha: ht... commented 2025-12-01 15:40:36 UTC by red_pandas ♦2 |
| 54666658 (Comments: 4) | they (Discussed changesets: 14) | I acknowledge the don’t tag for the renderer and generally agree. But if we were to argue for the use of permit then every road and path in theme parks and national parks would have to be tagged by permit. I appreciate you sharing the history o... commented 2025-12-01 14:42:16 UTC by Zandu ♦128 |
| 175352880 (Comments: 1) | wholesalecomputersupply (Discussed changesets: 1) | Your business is already on the map; please consider updating that object before adding duplicates. Please be aware advertising copy is inappropriate in OSM. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175360436 commented 2025-12-01 14:17:40 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,266 |
| 155386239 (Comments: 3) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 7) | thanks! commented 2025-12-01 12:52:40 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,791 |