| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 191213773 (Comments: 1) | Sophia Hilbert (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191270092 commented 2026-10-31 10:18:24 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191259559 (Comments: 1) | Speedy Pit Stop (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I flagged this changeset because at least one modified OSM element contains only tags commonly used for names or promotional content, without a tag describing the actual feature. While these tags can be perfectly valid, they should ... commented 2026-10-31 10:16:20 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191204426 (Comments: 1) | jeff-quade (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I flagged this changeset because at least one modified OSM element contains only tags commonly used for names or promotional content, without a tag describing the actual feature. While these tags can be perfectly valid, they should ... commented 2026-10-31 10:16:12 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191219407 (Comments: 1) | emeadows (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1573512956. What is the mean of the tags CTIVITY = Hike CLIMB_M = 12.8 CLOSED = 0 CREATED = 2021-05-18 DESCENT_M = -8.8 DIFFICULTY = White DIRECTION = Both Directions... commented 2026-10-31 10:06:08 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 191245512 (Comments: 1) | magnoliahomestores (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, In your edit you use the tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=yes". The tag "payment:cryptocurrencies=*" was a payment tag proposal which was rejected by the OSM community. Use this tag only when cryptocurrencies are NO... commented 2026-10-31 09:31:18 UTC by Comino ♦426 |
| 191268345 (Comments: 1) | leeagibsteinmd (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-31 09:30:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191268217 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | a small portion of romoland still exists after menifee incorporation annexed about 28 sq miles commented 2026-10-31 09:23:30 UTC by ieguy3 ♦75 |
| 190598555 (Comments: 1) | Hazard K9 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190644614 commented 2026-10-31 08:43:29 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191266965 (Comments: 1) | Arora Tech Blackwood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-31 08:36:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191257296 (Comments: 2) | Alex Wilson07 (Discussed changesets: 3) | User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21502 commented 2026-10-31 07:03:36 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191069415 (Comments: 2) | Royal Caribbean (Discussed changesets: 18) | User has been blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21487 commented 2026-10-31 07:02:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191229268 (Comments: 3) | lucidoffices (Discussed changesets: 25) | > And of course, a useless `.` as a changeset comment like in most of their previous changesets Which, to note, was exactly what you yourself banned them for (with the exact same comment), *twice* (because they kept at it after the first ti... commented 2026-10-31 07:00:51 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 191217008 (Comments: 1) | Rmacaraig (Discussed changesets: 16) | As you have been told well over a dozen times by now https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=24569206 and never once acknowledged, your changesets contain numerous malformed tags, such that the information you are trying to add wi... commented 2026-10-31 06:47:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 191264101 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 53) | Forgot to mention shortening the service road to the entrance until we get aerial imagery of the new road layout. commented 2026-10-31 06:18:03 UTC by TheNightRider ♦90 |
| 190984166 (Comments: 2) | bartpio (Discussed changesets: 3) | yes, good catch. I reverted 190984166. I'll work on another changeset that focuses more on Utley Brook, with standard tags. commented 2026-10-31 03:55:18 UTC by bartpio ♦3 |
| 191245252 (Comments: 1) | Calvin Gluck (Discussed changesets: 1) | This already exists (node 14156601801). I merged your new node with the previously existing node. commented 2026-10-31 03:04:50 UTC by caseywittmier ♦13 |
| 191199417 (Comments: 1) | Val (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Val, in the future please be sure to actually add junction=roundabout to new roundabouts, and match the highway=* tag according to the guidelines on the wiki page for roundabouts commented 2026-10-31 03:02:29 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191219400 (Comments: 1) | RainBirdLover (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi RainBirdLover, please be sure to use specific changeset comments. Something as simple as "Added street lights" is helpful to fellow mappers reviewing changes and others who look through histories. commented 2026-10-31 02:57:17 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191259226 (Comments: 1) | BradCW (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Brad, welcome to OSM, and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you. The specific problem here is that Lazy M Ct is comes closer to the middle of the building than Lazy Water Cv. Adding a fake parking lot at the end of the driveway does not he... commented 2026-10-31 02:56:07 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191147762 (Comments: 6) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | Hello Joseph P R, I may consider leaving this section of road trunk. However, I want to have the entire highway tagged with appropriate "maxspeed" values. You can use overpass turbo, Google Maps Street View, and Here Map Crea... commented 2026-10-31 02:25:03 UTC by BigSushi ♦6 |
| 188985293 (Comments: 6) | people128256 (Discussed changesets: 6) | I found one residential road named Northeast Campesinos Boulevard. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1391056686. I do believe it would be good to bring this issue up on either the Community Forum or Slack. commented 2026-10-31 02:07:45 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 191172656 (Comments: 1) | DonT155 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191259163 commented 2026-10-30 23:42:25 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190223638 (Comments: 4) | Royal Caribbean (Discussed changesets: 18) | Thanks - reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191258936 and blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21502 . Please let us know if you see any others! commented 2026-10-30 23:30:29 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,925 |
| 191245358 (Comments: 2) | Bill Folk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you. Noted. Will not happen again. Cheers. commented 2026-10-30 21:17:09 UTC by Bill Folk ♦1 |
| 191122494 (Comments: 1) | northpacific (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, I can confirm this (also visible on King County 2025 orthoimagery, available in the backgrounds sidebar on the right of the editor). Good catch, I didn't see that this hadn't been updated in OpenStreetMap yet. I'm going through an... commented 2026-10-30 21:10:20 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 191255563 (Comments: 1) | DRinTexas (Discussed changesets: 1) | Set up within last 2 days of 10/30/2026. Picture avail. commented 2026-10-30 21:08:35 UTC by DRinTexas ♦1 |
| 191250240 (Comments: 1) | 68916 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi 68916, Thanks for your contribution. FYI, in RapidEditor you can use the Q hotkey to square a building so every angle is 90 degrees. It makes the resulting buildings look a lot cleaner commented 2026-10-30 19:25:30 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 189705131 (Comments: 2) | HolyCrapThatsALongUsername (Discussed changesets: 9) | Sounds good! Thanks for letting me know commented 2026-10-30 15:58:20 UTC by HolyCrapThatsALongUsername ♦14 |
| 191148092 (Comments: 27) | scrambling_panda (Discussed changesets: 3) | "I am fine with the conditional access. I am not fine with gates being removed even though they currently exist. Let's do hope that the closure is lifted tomorrow because I am very pessimistic with this whole construction project and whethe... commented 2026-10-30 15:02:30 UTC by Huong Dang ♦13 |
| 48480811 (Comments: 2) | AlaskaDave (Discussed changesets: 67) | I obtained GPS traces from a person who rode a bicycle over the Iditarod Trail. The small details are not verifiable by me and, in fact, the actual position of the trails varies from year to year depending on many factors. Also, in Alaska riv... commented 2026-10-30 14:38:49 UTC by AlaskaDave ♦182 |
| 189743583 (Comments: 1) | FunkyPomeranian39 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I always love seeing somebody put so much care into building outlines. Great job. commented 2026-10-30 13:38:25 UTC by jhaluska80 ♦113 |
| 190903374 (Comments: 3) | Payton C (Discussed changesets: 1) | It would make sense to explain this term under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access. commented 2026-10-30 13:21:49 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 180024725 (Comments: 2) | Roseland (Discussed changesets: 1) | I dont believe i touched that, just the roads in town. commented 2026-10-30 13:20:50 UTC by Roseland ♦1 |
| 191236069 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Sazanovich (Discussed changesets: 13) | correction: HOV tags were added to the trunk road commented 2026-10-30 12:48:34 UTC by Maksim Sazanovich ♦16 |
| 190858523 (Comments: 1) | Pabtlope (Discussed changesets: 1) | You added this camera as part of a crosswalk. Could you please move this to the correct location and detach it from the crosswalk? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190858523 ... commented 2026-10-30 12:44:25 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 190863321 (Comments: 1) | NRutt2005 (Discussed changesets: 3) | It's generally a good idea to include the street name on sidewalks as well. Pedestrians like turn by turn instructions, too! Also foot=yes is redundant a bicycle=yes and horse=yes are highly unlikely for sidewalks. --- ... commented 2026-10-30 12:43:32 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,623 |
| 191234464 (Comments: 1) | savannahsterling (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-30 12:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191225995 (Comments: 1) | AboveAllGarageDoors (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-30 08:21:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191225939 (Comments: 1) | AboveAllGarageDoors (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-30 08:18:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191219273 (Comments: 1) | restorationuplift (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/191223192 Comment: "Remove spam" commented 2026-10-30 06:49:08 UTC by NeisRevert ♦2,076 |
| 191143193 (Comments: 2) | restorationuplift (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191195668 commented 2026-10-30 06:48:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 188541796 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Yes, this is standard. A nearby example where the road has its own identity is the New York State Thruway which crosses the Hudson River via the Tappan Zee Bridge. But in the case of many of the bridges of NYC, the bridge itself is its own roadway, a... commented 2026-10-30 06:41:59 UTC by ZLima12 ♦293 |
| 191218972 (Comments: 2) | henins1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your revision! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191219212 commented 2026-10-30 06:38:51 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191215338 (Comments: 2) | 911SentinelLynnwood (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Glassman, thanks for checking. This is a real, newly registered business (911 SENTINEL, LLC) at 15806 Hwy 99 Ste 1, Lynnwood, WA 98087. The pin was placed slightly off by mistake, which I'll correct. I'll re-add it inside the correct bui... commented 2026-10-30 05:25:03 UTC by 911SentinelLynnwood ♦1 |
| 183232720 (Comments: 4) | alexwohlbruck (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello, can you please respond to the comments? The Wiki is back up; there is no documentation. commented 2026-10-30 04:38:47 UTC by rivermont ♦246 |
| 191128926 (Comments: 1) | broiledskull (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191220414 commented 2026-10-30 03:59:24 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191162120 (Comments: 1) | WJones18 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191220079 commented 2026-10-30 03:38:44 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191169754 (Comments: 1) | MLY1989 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191219774 commented 2026-10-30 03:20:42 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191075130 (Comments: 1) | Espresso95 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! What's specifically is the source for this information? Do you have local knowledge to indicate that these railroads are all operated by this company? Thanks! commented 2026-10-30 02:56:23 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 191153972 (Comments: 1) | rodentshieldbellingham (Discussed changesets: 1) | removed node - seo spam. Not even in a building - plus looks like a residential area. unlikely to be open for people to stop in --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/191153972 ... commented 2026-10-29 23:47:53 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190422852 (Comments: 1) | RTMKE (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Thanks for being on top of new bike infrastructure. It looks like you're pretty new to OSM, so I recommend reading into The Great Path Controversy. One of the common agreements in the wake of the Controversy is that protected bike lanes can ... commented 2026-10-29 23:45:23 UTC by BPTT ♦97 |
| 190598445 (Comments: 3) | Hazard K9 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Thanks for the cleanup! commented 2026-10-29 23:01:27 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 188935351 (Comments: 1) | GNR8 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Be sure to put the right street name on the right houses on a specific block. Some are incorrect by several blocks. commented 2026-10-29 21:03:41 UTC by Zol87 ♦51 |
| 191209241 (Comments: 1) | Karen@Digible (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-29 19:39:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190797860 (Comments: 1) | ckronenburg (Discussed changesets: 2) | The airport diagram has been outdated and is not an accurate source. The FAA is behind on the publication, but the new diagram should release today. You can already see it on the FAA Weathercams site for KGPI. Please revert your changes to what we ac... commented 2026-10-29 19:23:36 UTC by GPIA-mgmt ♦2 |
| 190797494 (Comments: 1) | ckronenburg (Discussed changesets: 2) | The airport diagram has been outdated and is not an accurate source. The FAA is behind on the publication, but the new diagram should release today. You can already see it on the FAA Weathercams site for KGPI. Please revert your changes to what we ac... commented 2026-10-29 19:23:11 UTC by GPIA-mgmt ♦2 |
| 191208109 (Comments: 1) | IntegrityCrimeSceneGlendale (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-29 19:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191207230 (Comments: 1) | Karen@Digible (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-29 18:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191148515 (Comments: 2) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 238) | For the record the buildings I deleted were very large building=construction polygons spanning multiple detached houses and very roughly tracing the row houses, both of which were too poorly-mapped to utilize that plugin without remapping them first. commented 2026-10-29 18:33:58 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 191192914 (Comments: 2) | 0x4273 (Discussed changesets: 9) | Apologies for dumping a 130 message thread on you, but its part of a work in progress to formalize this tagging. Turns out recreation_grounds as the original definition intended are basically just a big grass field where you play soccer. https://comm... commented 2026-10-29 18:04:23 UTC by 0x4273 ♦5 |
| 191082045 (Comments: 1) | Gaviero62 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191205135 commented 2026-10-29 17:45:48 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191197737 (Comments: 2) | Café DIOR by Dominique Crenn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191198777 commented 2026-10-29 16:16:35 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190895215 (Comments: 3) | voidmain42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Oh and CourseBuilder exports to an open source repository here: https://github.com/SpotGolf/CourseData I'd love to rework the OSM tags to match the CourseData model. commented 2026-10-29 15:43:19 UTC by voidmain42 ♦1 |
| 191172739 (Comments: 1) | ICT_maps (Discussed changesets: 20) | A few points here, first it would be wonderful if there are separately mapped sidewalks along a road when you split the bridge out of a road that you do the same with the sidewalks since the sidewalks are also going to be on a bridge, either the same... commented 2026-10-29 15:37:37 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 191197957 (Comments: 1) | Sergei Amuzinski (Discussed changesets: 11) | based on mapbox owned-licensed telemetry data* commented 2026-10-29 14:55:24 UTC by Sergei Amuzinski ♦13 |
| 191170985 (Comments: 1) | mwchipper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi I see you requested a review on this changeset. You have a typo in the operator tag. Other than that, it looks fine. commented 2026-10-29 14:50:34 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 191170081 (Comments: 1) | mwchipper (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi and welcome to OSM. I see you requested review on this changeset. Looks fine to me! Happy mapping. commented 2026-10-29 14:46:04 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 191197216 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 33) | #mapbox_hov commented 2026-10-29 14:38:04 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦34 |
| 191187703 (Comments: 2) | JJ_P (Discussed changesets: 13) | Hello! Sorry for removing that name; I couldn’t find any confirmation of it. Thank you for your feedback. commented 2026-10-29 14:37:18 UTC by JJ_P ♦11 |
| 190255738 (Comments: 3) | JXKPomelo (Discussed changesets: 12) | 6th Ave between Monaghan Rd & Del Ray St is still undivided, with EB/WB traffic still using the future WB 6th ave lanes. I changed the EB lanes back to construction. commented 2026-10-29 14:31:18 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦17 |
| 191182009 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 33) | #mapbox_hov commented 2026-10-29 14:16:49 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦34 |
| 191181007 (Comments: 1) | Maksim Hradaboyeu (Discussed changesets: 33) | #mapbox_hov commented 2026-10-29 14:15:55 UTC by Maksim Hradaboyeu ♦34 |
| 191080467 (Comments: 1) | bbhme (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191190638 commented 2026-10-29 12:08:25 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 191082209 (Comments: 1) | Sonoran Desert Sanctuary (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191189414 commented 2026-10-29 11:38:37 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 191073363 (Comments: 2) | Foster Cardoza (Discussed changesets: 1) | I wasn’t 100% sure so I marked it down just in case,I agree that it also looks temporary, however Kroger has had their ‘temporary’ cameras up for a while. I assumed that placing the nodes would be fine and if not someone else... commented 2026-10-29 11:23:25 UTC by Foster Cardoza ♦1 |
| 191082208 (Comments: 1) | Gaviero62 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191187666 commented 2026-10-29 10:57:05 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 191125638 (Comments: 1) | bbhme (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191187574 commented 2026-10-29 10:55:05 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191113970 (Comments: 3) | JaeWitThaK (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @Wildsharky commented 2026-10-29 10:44:09 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191081602 (Comments: 1) | Sonoran Desert Sanctuary (Discussed changesets: 2) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191186218 commented 2026-10-29 10:22:40 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 191112983 (Comments: 1) | BAFAMI (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191185979 commented 2026-10-29 10:18:31 UTC by MappingMore ♦793 |
| 191125722 (Comments: 1) | bbhme (Discussed changesets: 4) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191184383 commented 2026-10-29 09:44:56 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191036262 (Comments: 1) | jusman79 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected database in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191183526 commented 2026-10-29 09:21:58 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191116589 (Comments: 1) | WyattZZZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191178258 commented 2026-10-29 06:52:52 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191177181 (Comments: 1) | ImranKhanFL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-29 06:12:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191076002 (Comments: 2) | ClaytonL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Unfortunately I don't remember and I probably won't be able to revisit the site. Doing some research online, it looks like all the connected docks are included in the marina but I've been unable to confirm that 100%. Given that, do you... commented 2026-10-29 06:01:59 UTC by ClaytonL ♦1 |
| 191167080 (Comments: 2) | RiddlersBailBondsCA (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for your revision @RiddlersBailBondsCA https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191167389 commented 2026-10-29 05:39:45 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191120699 (Comments: 3) | CadencePHL (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @pkoby https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191166940 commented 2026-10-29 05:26:34 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191166689 (Comments: 3) | SwiftPro Heating Cooling and Plumbing (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the revision @SwiftPro%20Heating%20Cooling%20and%20Plumbing 👍 commented 2026-10-29 05:25:18 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191166179 (Comments: 2) | SwiftPro Heating Cooling and Plumbing (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thanks for the revision @SwiftPro%20Heating%20Cooling%20and%20Plumbing 👍 commented 2026-10-29 05:24:47 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191173651 (Comments: 1) | Asa Foreman (Discussed changesets: 5) | The changeset comment is an error, I was unaware I had previous edits sitting in the editor before I uploaded the changeset. In addition to the node change, I converted Bellview Baptist Church to an area. The node by which it was previously represent... commented 2026-10-29 02:32:39 UTC by Asa Foreman ♦4 |
| 170951377 (Comments: 2) | svansing (Discussed changesets: 10) | It was an error. It was intended to be "Location.transition = yes". It has been corrected. commented 2026-10-29 02:32:21 UTC by svansing ♦7 |
| 187824226 (Comments: 1) | Nasdaq500 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Nasdaq500, based on feedback provided by another user, these cameras are not made by Axon, instead they are normal CCTV cameras. I have preserved the objects you have added, but changed the tags from ALPR to camera. You may not be able to see t... commented 2026-10-29 01:36:02 UTC by SherbetS ♦175 |
| 187716963 (Comments: 3) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | That new alignment is a temporary relocation of the road during the construction phase. commented 2026-10-29 00:51:53 UTC by AmpereBEEP ♦3 |
| 191066502 (Comments: 1) | Bodega Marine Reserve (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. The feature you removed in this changeset is valid. Please don’t remove valid OSM data. You have a new account and might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on ... commented 2026-10-28 23:42:13 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191053270 (Comments: 2) | BrettJeffries (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome Back* commented 2026-10-28 23:34:24 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191170703 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | source=survey, not source=streetlevel_imagery... 🤦♂️ commented 2026-10-28 23:30:57 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 191151296 (Comments: 1) | gwb2 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of ... commented 2026-10-28 23:27:45 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191166369 (Comments: 1) | Casa Bella Residences (Discussed changesets: 1) | there where a few issues with these 3 edits so I will put them here. From the get go I went through and fixed what I could but as you know the property better if you see anything I did wrong please feel free to respond here or edit your self. Firs... commented 2026-10-28 23:25:46 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190908399 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 9) | Hi! I see this phone number cannot be valid; 184 is not a valid central office code as NANP central office codes cannot start with "1". I added a fixme=* in changeset 191170435, but would be great if you could help fix it or at least point ... commented 2026-10-28 23:09:11 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 191162147 (Comments: 1) | RickS22-49 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of ... commented 2026-10-28 22:54:49 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 189655590 (Comments: 2) | Landsat6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected, thanks. commented 2026-10-28 22:21:27 UTC by Landsat6 ♦1 |
| 191159478 (Comments: 1) | alpacaMaps (Discussed changesets: 11) | This node is legit! Many apologies to Hermit405 who submitted it originally. The node is attached to the light pole on this side street and appears to be operated on city power as it lacks the solar panel component. commented 2026-10-28 21:36:30 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 188068488 (Comments: 5) | Hermit405 (Discussed changesets: 1) | My sincerest apologies, you are entirely correct! I apologize for incurring your extra time to validate a previously correct edit, also. I had already stepped out to run by there and also validated the node is placed on the aforementioned light pole ... commented 2026-10-28 21:33:41 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦431 |
| 191167289 (Comments: 1) | Jack0188 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 21:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 186308516 (Comments: 3) | Loopslol7 (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi Loopslol7, Thanks for correcting so fast, but only 'yes' or 'no' should be used and 'yes;designated' should not be used (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling#Recycling ). Kind ... commented 2026-10-28 20:29:55 UTC by lyctkel ♦391 |
| 191028551 (Comments: 16) | ion_chi (Discussed changesets: 14) | Response from Luisa Torres. I'll also ask her to send out a broader email to people subscribed to the construction updates so we're clear. commented 2026-10-28 20:11:30 UTC by Huong Dang ♦13 |
| 191162091 (Comments: 1) | georgemasonjr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for contributing! While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node. The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cr... commented 2026-10-28 18:27:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191159104 (Comments: 1) | Lonen (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, some of the deleted ways were edited in recent months, and several are still visible in satellite imagery. Could you please clarify whether these paths have actually disappeared on the ground or whether access has simply been restrict... commented 2026-10-28 18:27:02 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191072606 (Comments: 1) | jayboknows (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191161923 commented 2026-10-28 18:20:59 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191160440 (Comments: 1) | eskimo_pi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Accidentally flagged this for review! The edits are standard updates and don't actually need a second look commented 2026-10-28 17:47:59 UTC by eskimo_pi ♦1 |
| 190849028 (Comments: 1) | mcoopersmith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Unless we're talking about something like the Brooklyn Bridge, we shouldn't tag small inconsequential bridges like this with a name (unless it really is a named bridge). commented 2026-10-28 17:27:35 UTC by b-jazz ♦976 |
| 190812730 (Comments: 2) | TheBestIdea (Discussed changesets: 74) | I try! commented 2026-10-28 16:22:21 UTC by TheBestIdea ♦120 |
| 191008919 (Comments: 1) | devemporer (Discussed changesets: 5) | why remove construction=motorway, that tag looks correct in this case to me? Happy mapping, Udar commented 2026-10-28 16:18:21 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 190098799 (Comments: 3) | Buttons Cheely (Discussed changesets: 35) | so I am putting the hashtag in the wrong box...i will make the adjustment. I apologize for that commented 2026-10-28 16:17:09 UTC by Buttons Cheely ♦2 |
| 191147595 (Comments: 2) | Buttons Cheely (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hope that helps! Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-28 15:21:45 UTC by JuanElDemografo ♦59 |
| 191148108 (Comments: 1) | rockymountainent (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 13:39:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191127878 (Comments: 2) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 11) | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191148092 commented 2026-10-28 13:37:25 UTC by scrambling_panda ♦26 |
| 190371291 (Comments: 5) | BigSushi (Discussed changesets: 9) | Reverted in changeset/191147762 commented 2026-10-28 13:27:26 UTC by Joseph R P ♦476 |
| 191147547 (Comments: 1) | Gary Baptiste (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 13:24:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191106510 (Comments: 2) | RB Neville (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi RB Neville, Thanks for your clarification. I've tried to address your concerns and update the map accordingly. You can review my changes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191147409 Could you please take a l... commented 2026-10-28 13:21:07 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191106803 (Comments: 4) | RB Neville (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi RB Neville, Thanks for your clarification. I've tried to address your concerns and update the map accordingly. You can review my changes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191147409 Could you please take a l... commented 2026-10-28 13:21:00 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 475302 (Comments: 1) | firefighter (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25519895/history has location = yes that was added in this edit what is the meaning of this tag? commented 2026-10-28 13:15:52 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 191144279 (Comments: 1) | Timely Health (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 12:03:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 184441153 (Comments: 3) | Marcthenarc (Discussed changesets: 2) | You can upload that photo to https://imgur.com and post link here. commented 2026-10-28 11:26:09 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,582 |
| 191132225 (Comments: 1) | Dean the handyman (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! No business entry without any real address . I will remove this spam. commented 2026-10-28 10:18:59 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 155001654 (Comments: 3) | Derek Morr (Discussed changesets: 6) | sorry for a duplicate :( commented 2026-10-28 08:41:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 185052822 (Comments: 1) | RailandSea (Discussed changesets: 21) | hello! Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5604116 ? commented 2026-10-28 08:41:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190720568 (Comments: 1) | SherbetS (Discussed changesets: 34) | Over 500 nodes get deleted, by whom and for what reason? commented 2026-10-28 08:00:19 UTC by anticommie ♦1 |
| 135916775 (Comments: 1) | happilymappingrway (Discussed changesets: 33) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10882368693/history has location = yes that was added in this edit what is the meaning of this tag? commented 2026-10-28 08:00:03 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 191040154 (Comments: 1) | spacex02 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191131179 commented 2026-10-28 06:03:52 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 190941136 (Comments: 2) | Lkumar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 23) | Hi carciofo, My name is Lalit, and I am a mapper on the OpenStreetMap team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. I’ve removed the leftover road segment and the associated no_u_turn restriction in this changeset (http... commented 2026-10-28 05:37:11 UTC by Lkumar_lyft ♦9 |
| 191130051 (Comments: 1) | kghomesmn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-28 05:00:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191051173 (Comments: 2) | sarya_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 28) | Hi Alexey Lukin, My name is Surander, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for reaching out and sharing the latest information. Regarding my edits, I updated the road direction based on Lyft-owned street-level imagery from Septe... commented 2026-10-28 04:23:21 UTC by sarya_Lyft ♦18 |
| 191038312 (Comments: 2) | santoshipanwar_lyft (Discussed changesets: 7) | Hi Udarian, My name is Santoshi, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. After reviewing the edit again, I realized that I had relied on outdated sources and failed to verify the history of ... commented 2026-10-28 04:19:01 UTC by santoshipanwar_lyft ♦8 |
| 189853931 (Comments: 2) | DividedFrame (Discussed changesets: 9) | I drove by on McEmurray Road--the side I usually don't see--this afternoon. There is a sign for 21 Golf Club construction and contractor's trailer, but not much else visible from the road. I've changed this to landuse=construct... commented 2026-10-28 03:58:26 UTC by bdentremont ♦64 |
| 191127224 (Comments: 1) | dxapanta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for contributing! While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node. The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cr... commented 2026-10-28 01:51:39 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 180976298 (Comments: 1) | AsterT (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi AsterT. Thanks for adding some buildings. I've fixed these up, but when adding building outlines, please don't put the house number in the 'name' field. That field is reserved for buildings that have an actual name. The house n... commented 2026-10-27 20:38:11 UTC by Adam Franco ♦172 |
| 191114935 (Comments: 1) | florisje (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thank you for adding this commented 2026-10-27 20:05:46 UTC by Adam850 ♦11 |
| 191116290 (Comments: 4) | Captain Kit Carson (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @Captain%20Kit%20Carson 👍 commented 2026-10-27 19:30:57 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190762514 (Comments: 83) | matthewfecica (Discussed changesets: 16) | Yeah, see also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/tagging-implied-access-restrictions-for-hiking-route-member-ways/149178/20 for my attempt to break down where the disagreement is happening commented 2026-10-27 18:25:42 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190811580 (Comments: 1) | Brantley Warren (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1570212689. What is the mean of the tags legal = PT FRL SW millage_rate = 49.9 owner_mailing_address = 6042 Lock & Dam Road, Ozark, AK 72949 plot_type = Ex. Government... commented 2026-10-27 18:13:21 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 191113435 (Comments: 2) | OneSpecificSunday (Discussed changesets: 1) | I may have inadvertently moved more than the camera node that I had intended. This can be reverted to restore the accidental changes and I can add the camera node back. commented 2026-10-27 17:49:04 UTC by OneSpecificSunday ♦1 |
| 190993763 (Comments: 2) | Kellner21 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Info from the city's own files on its drainage infrastructure. Just deleting it all, no interest in finding out the meaning of all that info. More info is not better if it's not understood. commented 2026-10-27 17:23:05 UTC by Kellner21 ♦3 |
| 177834378 (Comments: 1) | ieguy3 (Discussed changesets: 74) | You do nice work. commented 2026-10-27 17:17:24 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 180877284 (Comments: 1) | mapadu (Discussed changesets: 10) | Is there a reason why Salton Sea State Recreation Area does not use wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2933976? commented 2026-10-27 17:11:52 UTC by Precision Guesswork ♦11 |
| 189376988 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 114) | Thank you, Sir – according to Overpass Turbo (nwr["traffic_sign"~"^US:D2.*a$"]), you have added the first and only Bicycle Distance road signs in the USA so far. I could see and enjoy them on Apple Maps. As a European (where... commented 2026-10-27 15:41:29 UTC by MapsByEX ♦3 |
| 190908043 (Comments: 1) | j0hn33y (Discussed changesets: 22) | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1570961046, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1570961058. What is the mean of the tags ACREAGE = .180 ADDRESS = 1009 JACKSON RD AVIS = 0029 CITY_TEXT = PARK HILLS CLASS_TEXT ... commented 2026-10-27 15:08:43 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,942 |
| 190910589 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 14:14:52 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 191103819 (Comments: 1) | tsjordan (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 14:06:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191100912 (Comments: 1) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello! I am not familiar with OsmAnd's routing but I can make a guess. I believe that since Student Circle is marked as a driveway, routers might ignore the fact that access=no and motor_vehicle=private. I imagine this is because many drivewa... commented 2026-10-27 13:54:38 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 191037311 (Comments: 2) | jmapb (Discussed changesets: 53) | Thanks, missed that one -- reverted commented 2026-10-27 12:59:31 UTC by jmapb ♦435 |
| 191034762 (Comments: 1) | dallasoruser1 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191098345 commented 2026-10-27 12:04:12 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191098084 (Comments: 1) | kghomesmn (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 12:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191094951 (Comments: 1) | OTR Truck Trailer Repair (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 10:45:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191024987 (Comments: 1) | ResplendentGrace (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191092186 commented 2026-10-27 09:39:46 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191091769 (Comments: 1) | GetGuttersJax (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 09:27:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191037976 (Comments: 1) | ttyylllrr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191091323 commented 2026-10-27 09:16:34 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191090609 (Comments: 1) | PIOfAtlanta (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 09:03:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191090140 (Comments: 1) | One of One (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 08:51:41 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191065361 (Comments: 6) | Get Your Fizzy (Discussed changesets: 1) | I agree with @Omnific. OSM maps verifiable, real-world features, not virtual businesses or service areas. commented 2026-10-27 07:15:53 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 182977588 (Comments: 2) | Brennen T Reilly (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191066619 commented 2026-10-27 07:10:20 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191066556 (Comments: 1) | DrRandazzo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thank you for your contribution. Could you please confirm whether the street signs you observed are current, and whether the official renaming has been implemented? Recent street-level photographs would be helpful. Please note th... commented 2026-10-27 07:09:13 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 191066619 (Comments: 1) | DrRandazzo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, thank you for your contribution. Could you please confirm whether the street signs you observed are current, and whether the official renaming has been implemented? Recent street-level photographs would be helpful. Please note th... commented 2026-10-27 07:09:03 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190960917 (Comments: 4) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 28) | I understand that your point is really that edit stacking makes reverting more difficult. I can't think of an easy way to detect spam like this automatically, so what do you think would work well as a solution? Maybe something like... commented 2026-10-27 07:03:55 UTC by confusedbuffalo ♦505 |
| 191086143 (Comments: 1) | WE Grapple Inc (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-27 07:00:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190532225 (Comments: 4) | TesseractPi (Discussed changesets: 2) | Should be fixed now commented 2026-10-27 05:17:59 UTC by TesseractPi ♦1 |
| 190981893 (Comments: 3) | Justin Wyse (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks @dknelson9876 commented 2026-10-27 05:17:43 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190910609 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:47:08 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 190953559 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:46:47 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 190978355 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:46:29 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 190994126 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:46:17 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 190994670 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:45:46 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 191053021 (Comments: 1) | tastywater (Discussed changesets: 9) | I accidentally set the mapillary= tag to persistent in Vespucci, but that image is not relevant to this changeset. commented 2026-10-27 04:44:42 UTC by tastywater ♦10 |
| 189896962 (Comments: 2) | SteveRal (Discussed changesets: 7) | And the exit from the neighborhood south of Ohio ave on S Lincoln st is now missing an exit from the alleyway, causing routing errors. Please be more careful when editing in the future as this interchange area now needs lots of work with all the now ... commented 2026-10-27 04:40:52 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦17 |
| 190905941 (Comments: 1) | G's (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi G's, can you provide a source that this parking lot is named "350 KwH"? A measurement is an odd name for a parking lot, especially a power measurement for a parking lot that doesn't have eV charging. And that the correc... commented 2026-10-27 03:19:06 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191069274 (Comments: 1) | swimdb (Discussed changesets: 56) | Hi swimdb, looks like added a way with just the tag building:part=yes with no other details, and it also doesn't cover the entire building=yes area (which is an expectation of Simple 3D Buildings). Was this intentional? commented 2026-10-27 03:08:18 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191068280 (Comments: 1) | hassan10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi hassan10, you appear to have added a duplicate of a POI that was already present on the map. Was this intentional, or is there a website, app, or tool that is failing to show the existing location? commented 2026-10-27 03:05:53 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191068140 (Comments: 1) | hassan10 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi hassan10, you appear to have added a duplicate of a POI that was already present on the map. Was this intentional, or is there a website, app, or tool that is failing to show the existing location? commented 2026-10-27 03:05:44 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 191036889 (Comments: 1) | LeahLouvie (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi LeahLouvie, welcome to OSM and mapping in Utah! We're happy to have you, and thank you for your contributions. Please note that there is an expected format that mappers have agreed upon for address conventions, which you can read about at htt... commented 2026-10-27 03:03:34 UTC by dknelson9876 ♦166 |
| 190898373 (Comments: 3) | tjasz (Discussed changesets: 3) | Er, I mean I'll be using both of those more in the future. For this crossing, just `hawk`. commented 2026-10-27 02:41:35 UTC by tjasz ♦4 |
| 191033907 (Comments: 1) | Malcolm Maas (Discussed changesets: 14) | Butland Court is listed as a road in the Massachusetts GIS. The wiki does not establish a minimum width for a road, so narrowness alone is not sufficient justification to reclassify it. commented 2026-10-27 00:50:43 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦213 |
| 146689250 (Comments: 1) | Mr Matt K (Discussed changesets: 15) | Good edit with the note on way 11922660, I immediately figured out what was going on with the PPL line overlap It might be better to just make a separate way for dissimilar circuits commented 2026-10-27 00:36:22 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦34 |
| 170625878 (Comments: 2) | convissor (Discussed changesets: 14) | Thank you for the heads up. Didn't realize it would be a problem. I created a new relation for all the trails and fixed all the access tags. commented 2026-10-27 00:12:25 UTC by convissor ♦11 |
| 191078602 (Comments: 1) | DFWPestGuard (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-26 23:51:47 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 183609202 (Comments: 1) | mneko (Discussed changesets: 28) | Are you sure about the location of this dock? It appears to be in a detention pond on all available imagery. commented 2026-10-26 23:50:50 UTC by hobbesvsboyle ♦22 |
| 190902596 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 44) | o7, thanks! commented 2026-10-26 23:12:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 190980144 (Comments: 1) | Ridder8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a flock camera. This is a weather camera installed by DOT to help analyze road conditions. This does not capture and does not have the ability to capture license plates, and is not a surveillance camera. If you continue to re-add it marke... commented 2026-10-26 22:58:27 UTC by RedSkies ♦16 |
| 190826792 (Comments: 2) | confusedbuffalo-bot (Discussed changesets: 28) | and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14304690924/history commented 2026-10-26 22:13:32 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,925 |
| 191073478 (Comments: 1) | Lakeside Pet Spa (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-26 20:39:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 191072533 (Comments: 1) | JRBrown (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome, and thanks for contributing! While reviewing your changeset, I noticed a potentially unintended geometry change involving a moved node. The automated check looks for situations where moving a node may cause connected ways to cr... commented 2026-10-26 20:09:40 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 43812883 (Comments: 2) | Ballard OpenStreetMap (Discussed changesets: 5) | I removed those 3 tags in lieu of a response. Happy mapping! commented 2026-10-26 19:21:47 UTC by pwbriggs ♦520 |
| 190965349 (Comments: 1) | Jwheels98765 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello there :) "cleanup" does not describe what you did. Please read and apply https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments to future changes at OSM. Thank you commented 2026-10-26 19:21:09 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,434 |
| 191069751 (Comments: 1) | Melbious99 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap :) thanks for taking care of Warwick. You asked for a review of your edit and I can say that all four of them to date look fine. Regarding this school you might wish to take a look at our wiki ... commented 2026-10-26 19:17:50 UTC by silversurfer83 ♦4,434 |
| 190890862 (Comments: 1) | NoPeekin1234567890 (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, I see that you've added footway=sidewalk to a lot of the footpaths around here. Apologies if this is a bit nit-picky, but I believe that per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway=sidewalk#What_is_considered_a_sidewalk, a ... commented 2026-10-26 19:16:07 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦25 |
| 191032309 (Comments: 1) | MidwestMapGeek (Discussed changesets: 37) | Have you considered adding a wikidata tag for the operator? (Q5382468) commented 2026-10-26 18:17:03 UTC by KFCmenomonie ♦12 |
| 191020875 (Comments: 1) | p**um***u****m*******p********v************** (Discussed changesets: 10) | Hello, How come you removed the name from the Savanna Avenue alleway? Local GIS and the plat of South Orchard Phase 2 show this alleway being named Savanna Avenue. Do you have any evidence otherwise? commented 2026-10-26 17:54:32 UTC by ScrawnyMeowth1 ♦59 |
| 191063516 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 313) | Source: Bing commented 2026-10-26 16:23:34 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦405 |
| 191034627 (Comments: 1) | JaacobRaamos (Discussed changesets: 7) | Did you mean to add ford=yes to 6th St? The ford tag is for roads and paths that cross rivers without a bridge commented 2026-10-26 16:14:05 UTC by ion_chi ♦111 |
| 191048712 (Comments: 1) | Digitaleo (Discussed changesets: 57) | Are you sure this is the right place? Seems a bit odd to have a random node in small town midwest US with contact information for some place in France. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/chang... commented 2026-10-26 14:54:45 UTC by mrpenner ♦5 |
| 191026520 (Comments: 1) | Medieval (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191048572 commented 2026-10-26 10:59:31 UTC by ajmat ♦666 |
| 191045903 (Comments: 1) | novacafeastoria (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-26 09:54:43 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 190953384 (Comments: 5) | Unknown Sample (Discussed changesets: 2) | https://trails.lacounty.gov/Files/QuickGuide/HastingDebris.pdf commented 2026-10-26 09:41:21 UTC by Unknown Sample ♦1 |
| 190991303 (Comments: 1) | Firearch (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191044609 commented 2026-10-26 09:21:42 UTC by Wildsharky ♦1,271 |
| 191035636 (Comments: 1) | ConnerRudi (Discussed changesets: 4) | Your changeset was tagged as using Bing imagery, but it's from September 2023. Did you use some other source, such as Esri? Esri is from May 2026, for reference. commented 2026-10-26 07:31:04 UTC by Allison P ♦1,154 |
| 191033889 (Comments: 2) | Mercy Patrick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/191039471 commented 2026-10-26 06:33:55 UTC by rajdhani ♦642 |
| 190420481 (Comments: 1) | Rhino Roofers: San Antonio Roofing Company (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-26 06:30:49 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 119513931 (Comments: 1) | UrbanUnPlanner (Discussed changesets: 22) | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050592207 railway=loading_rack ? what is that? commented 2026-10-26 06:14:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190993202 (Comments: 1) | ajpennyroblox2ii (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please do not make up names on OpenStreetMap commented 2026-10-26 03:39:55 UTC by willkmis ♦234 |
| 191035888 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:17:44 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 191035900 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:17:32 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 191035929 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:17:24 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 191035967 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:17:08 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 191035992 (Comments: 1) | tjboegle (Discussed changesets: 5) | you dont need a "permit" to ride these - only a membership or day pass. setting them as permit only prevents them from being used on routing software like ride with gps. commented 2026-10-26 03:16:48 UTC by tjboegle ♦6 |
| 189845522 (Comments: 3) | Hesh123 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Sorry I am so late with a response, but as can be seen in the example screenshot I have attached below the ALPR (the one selected) is within the road area, please use aerial imagery to make sure that the position is correct, ALPR's are very rare... commented 2026-10-26 03:09:53 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 191031366 (Comments: 1) | SwellTime (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi welcome to OSM. Could you describe why you removed the trails in this changeset? Try to let people know what sort of thing in your changeset comments "Route classification" was not very helpful. Thanks commented 2026-10-26 00:58:39 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191033140 (Comments: 1) | MassCartog (Discussed changesets: 40) | spoke too soon missed this "HASTINGS DEBRIS BASIN TRAIL IS CLOSED TO PROTECT PUBLIC SAFETY AND SUPPORT THE ECOSYSTEM’S RECOVERY FROM THE 2025 EATON FIRE. " commented 2026-10-25 23:56:24 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 190837278 (Comments: 3) | Transit Captain (Discussed changesets: 2) | I reverted it. I want you to know it's possible your edit may technically be correct due to one or two conditions: Amtrak might not have bothered to reprogram the transponders and might not have bothered to add the ATC cab signal codes for speed... commented 2026-10-25 23:44:07 UTC by IsStatenIsland ♦34 |
| 188109079 (Comments: 1) | Unknown Sample (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of ... commented 2026-10-25 23:38:40 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 191032600 (Comments: 1) | Potatoleum (Discussed changesets: 6) | also divided meadows blvd and golden meadows way into two one-ways where there is a median commented 2026-10-25 23:25:52 UTC by Potatoleum ♦6 |
| 191026416 (Comments: 1) | OneTusi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome to OSM. Wanted to let you know, If the feature exists on the ground, it is valid. You might not be aware, on OSM, we do not remove features if they exist on the ground. If it exists on the ground, it is valid data regardless of ... commented 2026-10-25 22:22:21 UTC by MassCartog ♦503 |
| 141664342 (Comments: 2) | AntiCompositeNumber (Discussed changesets: 13) | Operator just comes from knowing the territory, ref will usually come from a marker on the pole or line. You usually have to see the same number more than once to confirm that it's a line number and not a pole number. There's a good view of... commented 2026-10-25 20:15:35 UTC by AntiCompositeNumber ♦38 |
| 176244754 (Comments: 1) | tguen (Discussed changesets: 39) | maybe building=houseboat would be better for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1460408755 and similar ones? commented 2026-10-25 18:52:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 157720583 (Comments: 1) | briansquared (Discussed changesets: 1) | maybe building=houseboat would be better for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204859081 ? commented 2026-10-25 18:51:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 191012768 (Comments: 1) | J k for e (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-10-25 18:26:31 UTC by Udarian ♦992 |
| 191017794 (Comments: 1) | Steven Vance (Discussed changesets: 7) | I traced Bing aerial maps commented 2026-10-25 16:04:38 UTC by Steven Vance ♦13 |
| 83618721 (Comments: 1) | dmccoy129 (Discussed changesets: 1) | hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5599795 ? commented 2026-10-25 15:44:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 164413107 (Comments: 2) | tguen (Discussed changesets: 39) | And for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368220605 - maybe building=static_caravan would be better? commented 2026-10-25 15:11:31 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,339 |
| 190886570 (Comments: 3) | SpeedPro North Houston (Discussed changesets: 1) | Yes, thanks a lot for cleaning this up, CAM. I really appreciate it! :) NeisRevert hasn't been re-enabled for this process yet, though. At the moment, NeisBot is only checking the US, since you're one of the few people who have activ... commented 2026-10-25 14:33:37 UTC by pitscheplatsch ♦7,210 |
| 190992671 (Comments: 1) | Evan Nichols (Virtual Tours) (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey Evan, thanks for adding some missing buildings to the map. You might want to hit `Q` after drawing rectangular buildings to make them actually rectangular. Alternatively you will find the function in the context menu on the building outline. H... commented 2026-10-25 12:11:33 UTC by aighes ♦63 |
| 190985426 (Comments: 1) | elpigz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction: Added informal trail connecting FS370 to Spring Gulch Road. commented 2026-10-25 02:51:20 UTC by elpigz ♦1 |
| 190535231 (Comments: 2) | towerrail (Discussed changesets: 1) | Very sorry! I must've pulled it on accident while moving around. Thanks for fixing it! commented 2026-10-24 23:04:17 UTC by towerrail ♦1 |
| 190684856 (Comments: 3) | Kellner21 (Discussed changesets: 3) | No worries, thanks for the quick response. I'll add the tag again. commented 2026-10-24 21:10:59 UTC by carciofo ♦197 |
| 181434989 (Comments: 4) | NE2 (Discussed changesets: 17) | > As for the changeset by Kellner21, they seem to be local, so it's possible it is signed now. I commented on that changeset to ask for details. Yup, that was going to be my next step. Thanks for the fast response! commented 2026-10-24 21:08:34 UTC by carciofo ♦197 |
| 190683802 (Comments: 4) | Kellner21 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Thanks. I'll change the tags. commented 2026-10-24 20:28:05 UTC by NE2 ♦15 |
| 190460171 (Comments: 7) | Dek77 (Discussed changesets: 1) | How can I attach a picture of the boundaries so you can see them? commented 2026-10-24 20:24:57 UTC by Dek77 ♦1 |
| 190962754 (Comments: 1) | kenmorelocksmith (Discussed changesets: 1) | Deleted. node was added to a parking lot --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/190962754 commented 2026-10-24 19:36:37 UTC by Glassman ♦6,059 |
| 190898381 (Comments: 1) | washington_irving (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the phone numbers added here were not in a valid format--they contained an incorrect +01 country code instead of the correct +1, and were in the E.123 format (space seperators) instead of the NANP-standar... commented 2026-10-24 19:28:57 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,268 |
| 189080789 (Comments: 1) | TheAmazingSparky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for editing. This building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1243552787) is not ALL Sherwin Williams. The business is already mapped as a node. There are additional businesses in the building. commented 2026-10-24 18:22:39 UTC by x000111 ♦2 |
| 190977223 (Comments: 1) | rubyros_map (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am not sure how to add it but the building number is 5955 commented 2026-10-24 18:18:52 UTC by rubyros_map ♦1 |
| 190981369 (Comments: 1) | Seasidegde (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, welcome and thank you for your contribution to OSM! I noticed that text in a description, note or slogan tag in your changeset may be promotional or SEO-related. To ensure OSM remains neutral and focused on map data, I recommend keeping... commented 2026-10-24 17:39:42 UTC by NeisBot ♦7,518 |
| 185595937 (Comments: 2) | GNR8 (Discussed changesets: 13) | Resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190975579 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190975481 commented 2026-10-24 15:01:02 UTC by Casey_boy ♦89 |