| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 188530010 (Comments: 1) | TransAct-JT (Discussed changesets: 15) | Please do not abbreviate street names. Spell out the full street name per OSM standards. Please refer to this link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations --- Published using OSMCha: https://os... commented 2026-09-04 21:28:10 UTC by Frank Peng ♦229 |
| 188450179 (Comments: 1) | dknelson9876 (Discussed changesets: 13) | I updated the office tag to "office=it", as that matches the closest. TaxHawk is a software company that runs tax prep websites, you're correct that they don't expect public visitors. commented 2026-09-04 20:37:34 UTC by WarnerK ♦1 |
| 187493114 (Comments: 4) | Matthew Grund (Discussed changesets: 27) | Hi Matthew, thanks for getting back to us. A zero-hour block is put in place when a mapper is making errors and not responding to comments or communications trying to establish a dialog. The block is immediately lifted once communication is establish... commented 2026-09-04 20:25:31 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188500816 (Comments: 1) | gregcrago (Discussed changesets: 42) | Though the road continous "below" the block and therefore should also do so in OSM. The block has proper access-tags, so that's a router-issue. I will revert your change. --- Published usin... commented 2026-09-04 20:00:59 UTC by aighes ♦58 |
| 188543300 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | I completely forgot to add a source 🤦 Anyway, here it is: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=SHC§ionNum=311. commented 2026-09-04 19:59:21 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188476209 (Comments: 1) | Khellhound (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution, and welcome! A couple comments. First, if these are truly not Flock cameras, please remove the "Flock" brand and wiki-data (theres a trashcan at the bottom of the panel in ID, next to the 'wikidata&... commented 2026-09-04 19:42:18 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦3 |
| 188502555 (Comments: 1) | PuddlesMapping (Discussed changesets: 1) | Re: Possible Import flag. Guaranteed human; just bored. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188502555 commented 2026-09-04 19:29:59 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦3 |
| 188390510 (Comments: 1) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 6) | Great work! Couple follow-up questions: Would the name for the lake Clear Lake also apply to the town Clear Lake? Should the name for the Dells go on the (currently-unmapped) geographic feature rather than the city-run recreation area? ... commented 2026-09-04 18:49:40 UTC by SD Mapman ♦93 |
| 185674950 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | Oh, no, it's not! The addr:street=* of this node is absolutely incorrect! The closest street is "Inner Circle." I honestly have no idea how I didn't catch that 😅 Thanks for fixing this anyway! commented 2026-09-04 18:07:02 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188474373 (Comments: 1) | PeterThiel6 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thanks peter commented 2026-09-04 18:04:39 UTC by schobbish ♦80 |
| 181556853 (Comments: 2) | Goofball5388 (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm not attached to it. I was just trying to clean up the mess that existed. I think around the coast I took some minor liberties anyway because the coastline in OSM and in the Boston dataset didn't align perfectly anyway and it was a lot o... commented 2026-09-04 17:42:17 UTC by Goofball5388 ♦1 |
| 180484935 (Comments: 1) | PedestrianMapping_CartoBypass (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi! Please be more careful: "cycleway:both=shared_parking_lane" broke the bike lane rendering on this roadway in both CyclOSM and OpenCycleMap. That tag is not compatible with these rendering services. commented 2026-09-04 17:39:19 UTC by BPTT ♦96 |
| 188536274 (Comments: 2) | SomeoneElse_Revert (Discussed changesets: 1938) | 2 were excluded from the revert: interim modification by user ion_chi on way 461219677 - skipping this interim modification by user iandees on way 1465615143 - skipping this They match addresses and had already been move... commented 2026-09-04 17:17:30 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,865 |
| 188534228 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Wrong source, should be this: https://www.a2gov.org/parks-and-recreation/parks-and-places/garden-homes-park/ commented 2026-09-04 16:26:12 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 187816176 (Comments: 3) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 18) | Hello @GA_Kevin, Sorry for the late reply, I didn't get a notification that you had replied. Yeah, I just noticed that I had incorrectly set `capacity=2` on each of the ones I'd created but I just fixed it. They are also live ... commented 2026-09-04 16:06:00 UTC by MacOSMapper ♦3 |
| 188135427 (Comments: 1) | rittoch (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hi rittoch, thanks for your contribution. However, there are a few significant issues here: By de-facto local convention, the directional suffix isn't currently in any of the Blacksburg street name=* s nor addr:street=* (except for Turner... commented 2026-09-04 15:37:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach ♦304 |
| 188530024 (Comments: 2) | IamJesse (Discussed changesets: 2) | Reverted. commented 2026-09-04 15:23:11 UTC by Glassman ♦6,031 |
| 188447867 (Comments: 4) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | doing landuse as multipolygon vs single polygon is not a settled debate and I prefer multipolygon's so I do not see the problem. If there wasn't any landuse bordering the hospital then yes a single polygon is better but in cases like this w... commented 2026-09-04 15:14:30 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188525783 (Comments: 1) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | In my head since I was a kid if you asked me if that grass and trees by the canal where part of the hospital I would tell you they are but I can accept the new alignment, but in Miami Dade landuse when attached to other landuse is done as multipolygo... commented 2026-09-04 15:07:08 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188448452 (Comments: 1) | Chris4856 (Discussed changesets: 0) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188529622 commented 2026-09-04 14:53:51 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188528282 (Comments: 1) | cstromw (Discussed changesets: 3) | More updates needed to add new city hall building and other features as construction finished commented 2026-09-04 14:24:54 UTC by cstromw ♦3 |
| 157855403 (Comments: 5) | valhikes (Discussed changesets: 11) | oh right, I thought about something closer to https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Outhouse_cm01.jpg commented 2026-09-04 13:54:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 182139005 (Comments: 2) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 44) | Sorry, my mistake. Added correct phone number. commented 2026-09-04 13:41:15 UTC by FlamingoOSM ♦15 |
| 185883668 (Comments: 1) | Dark Phantom (Discussed changesets: 3) | You already removed it, but I believe the claim that this camera is operated by Acton Police to be entirely incorrect. I have seen no evidence that Acton has any flock relationship. More importantly, it's not a Flock camera; it's Vu... commented 2026-09-04 13:26:46 UTC by gdt ♦59 |
| 188392572 (Comments: 3) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 230) | Look bud, I live here. Do us a favor and focus on your own town's neighborhoods. All I have to say is if you delete any more of ours you'll be reported. I created the exact boundaries of the neighborhoods starting with the neighborhoods aro... commented 2026-09-04 12:55:55 UTC by Lionturtledisciple ♦1 |
| 188520764 (Comments: 1) | Dima News nyc Cancun (Discussed changesets: 1) | im a designer not a hacker I work with the MTA. I'm helping them. I'm a technician. Please not block me again thank you. Have a happy Labor Day. commented 2026-09-04 11:30:45 UTC by Dima News nyc Cancun ♦1 |
| 168989612 (Comments: 1) | Jackso (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for adding more details to this area! Just a friendly note that we shouldn't use name tags to describe features that don't have names. I've removed some of the name="Tunnel" tags for the underpasses on th... commented 2026-09-04 10:37:39 UTC by ohmanger ♦48 |
| 188436575 (Comments: 1) | Map307 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188514491 commented 2026-09-04 09:03:09 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188390616 (Comments: 4) | _Shootz (Discussed changesets: 1) | Move the node back to the original position. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188510280 commented 2026-09-04 07:17:01 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188329279 (Comments: 1) | Heyyotag (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188491376 commented 2026-09-04 06:48:52 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188454332 (Comments: 2) | OHClNaMg (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood. Apologies for the rookie mistake, and thanks for the guidance! commented 2026-09-04 05:40:19 UTC by OHClNaMg ♦1 |
| 188444234 (Comments: 1) | Kenzie pflaum (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188507307 commented 2026-09-04 05:25:00 UTC by ajmat ♦418 |
| 188430499 (Comments: 1) | iliketrainsandplanes (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188506945 commented 2026-09-04 05:02:05 UTC by MappingMore ♦685 |
| 153913166 (Comments: 1) | hwierzbicki (Discussed changesets: 25) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12052073514/history has building = no that was added in this edit if something is not a building, then not adding building key is enough... No need for building=no commented 2026-09-04 04:31:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 166503210 (Comments: 3) | EuleKC (Discussed changesets: 8) | thanks! commented 2026-09-04 04:29:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188458366 (Comments: 1) | Adam Ferreira (Discussed changesets: 8) | Further block due to CoMaps problem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21240 commented 2026-09-04 04:24:38 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188318482 (Comments: 1) | troussos9 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Thanks for your contributions here! I just wanted to give you a heads up that the standard format for phone=* in the NANP (including the US) is +1-NNN-NNN-NNNN ; see https://osm.wiki/Key:phone#United_States . I fixed this for you (a... commented 2026-09-04 04:22:58 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188145348 (Comments: 1) | MrNate Geek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I have reverted this edit because you seem to have removed plaques that are still present. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188504976 commented 2026-09-04 03:13:50 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 188145092 (Comments: 1) | MrNate Geek (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello. I have reverted this edit because you seem to have removed plaques that are still present. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188504976 commented 2026-09-04 03:13:50 UTC by mewhenthe ♦25 |
| 188503428 (Comments: 2) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | DWG revert - sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188504056 commented 2026-09-04 02:33:12 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 187957659 (Comments: 2) | shinterro (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hey! Thanks for reaching out! Topically I would say it is probably a fine icon. I'll lean with the consensus that it represents the idea of 'dojo' and/or 'martial_arts' well enough at a glance, given that I have a US-c... commented 2026-09-04 01:58:30 UTC by shinterro ♦13 |
| 188428443 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:36 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188418442 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:31 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417896 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:26 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417709 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:21 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417615 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:17 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417316 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188417072 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:21:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188414531 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:20:54 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188414080 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:20:49 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188413302 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502772 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:18:24 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188431114 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502697 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:12:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188431319 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502662 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:11:23 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188431441 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502653 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:10:48 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188490093 (Comments: 1) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | Reverted sockpuppet vandalism in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188502616 See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21218 commented 2026-09-04 01:08:44 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188471761 (Comments: 2) | Belén Chicaiza_ADO_Bus (Discussed changesets: 16) | It's a sockpuppet of blocked user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mayor%20Dima%20Kishenko commented 2026-09-04 00:47:41 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188496329 (Comments: 2) | RaySorian (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood, so don't add those unless explicitly stated with signage. Do you want me to remove those tags? commented 2026-09-04 00:40:02 UTC by RaySorian ♦1 |
| 188460674 (Comments: 1) | dindidindi (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Not sure what the point of this change is. Miami is already represented by way #183831887, and the normal address for the university is 501 East High Street, not 900 something? commented 2026-09-04 00:19:08 UTC by Eiim ♦33 |
| 188500991 (Comments: 1) | ihateflockersss (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-03 23:59:33 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188501002 (Comments: 1) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 4) | To clarify, this was for the commuter rail portion of Newark Broad Street Station. commented 2026-09-03 23:35:13 UTC by jg027 ♦5 |
| 188379277 (Comments: 2) | Erin Gravley (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thank you for this information. I will tag them instead, as you suggested. commented 2026-09-03 23:07:36 UTC by Erin Gravley ♦1 |
| 188499899 (Comments: 1) | JoshW2021 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Correction: this changeset carries the wrong description. My editor reused the comment from my previous changeset. This changeset does NOT add SJ Storage - it adds Realcovery, a sober living residence at 676 Shoup Ave W, Twin Falls, from information ... commented 2026-09-03 22:38:45 UTC by JoshW2021 ♦1 |
| 188469607 (Comments: 1) | rajdhani (Discussed changesets: 35) | Hello! I was wondering why this was reverted? It is a separate cycleway that has a barrier in between the road and the bike path. commented 2026-09-03 21:24:01 UTC by washington_irving ♦1 |
| 188397622 (Comments: 2) | Mxdanger (Discussed changesets: 29) | Yeah, I figured it would be drained out eventually. You should create a note at this location with that information so other users are aware. commented 2026-09-03 18:24:26 UTC by Mxdanger ♦111 |
| 179554472 (Comments: 3) | whats9plus1021youstupid (Discussed changesets: 3) | thanks commented 2026-09-03 18:22:37 UTC by bobthebuilder423468 ♦14 |
| 188487316 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 6) | source = arcgis source_ref = https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/1f89e5ccada04b658ffe698310b9843d commented 2026-09-03 17:50:42 UTC by h234a2hm ♦6 |
| 188335286 (Comments: 1) | Revelry (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188464071 commented 2026-09-03 17:34:10 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188401329 (Comments: 4) | skillingholmejournal (Discussed changesets: 1) | for the revert commented 2026-09-03 17:09:09 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188481708 (Comments: 1) | Matt McCutchen (Discussed changesets: 61) | I originally mapped the tunnel in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115836408, then it was deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145393462, presumably inadvertently. I only know the location of the tunnel approximately. I t... commented 2026-09-03 16:18:26 UTC by Matt McCutchen ♦81 |
| 188405750 (Comments: 1) | Pixelpotato13 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! You add 18 nodes with the tags ALPR = yes NonCarTracking = yes What is the mean of the tags? Did you known the tag surveillance:type = ALPR? We also prefer keywords that are written in lowercase letters. commented 2026-09-03 16:09:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188474354 (Comments: 1) | Polk County 911 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! Please notice you add "only" a building with name Pioneer Fellowship Church". You don't add a church. Please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship commented 2026-09-03 15:55:40 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188479315 (Comments: 1) | lbacud (Discussed changesets: 1) | Please revert this. I accidentally added my edits as new ways instead of editing the existing ones. commented 2026-09-03 15:47:51 UTC by lbacud ♦1 |
| 188422082 (Comments: 1) | ihasmagyk (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, direction of the golf=hole lines is significant. They should point from the tee to the green. I corrected this one and another one you created in the last 24 hours and thought you'd want to know. commented 2026-09-03 15:35:07 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188478502 (Comments: 1) | J Doherty (Discussed changesets: 1) | Corrected position. The flock camera is on bank side of the road entering the plaza. Repositioned the view direction. commented 2026-09-03 15:29:26 UTC by J Doherty ♦1 |
| 188475716 (Comments: 1) | felicettilaw (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, while the tags look good there is one minor issue, the comment you left on this changeset is not very helpful, in OSM it is very helpful to leave a good changeset comment describing what you did and "-" is not real... commented 2026-09-03 15:28:17 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 179722424 (Comments: 2) | apm-wa (Discussed changesets: 18) | I think leaving the current medical icon as it is would be more appropriate. My opinion. commented 2026-09-03 15:13:50 UTC by apm-wa ♦262 |
| 180218806 (Comments: 2) | DUGA (Discussed changesets: 40) | Looks good. Note that I tag places doing Chinese martial arts, dojo, jiujitsu, tae kwon do and karate. It looks generally acceptable. commented 2026-09-03 14:12:30 UTC by DUGA ♦552 |
| 96749314 (Comments: 1) | kylebakerpa05 (Discussed changesets: 37) | I've reverted a lot of the road changes in parking lots. Per [the driveway documentation](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway), service roads in and around parking lots should not have the `driveway` tag. commented 2026-09-03 14:10:40 UTC by PuddlesMapping ♦3 |
| 176887150 (Comments: 1) | FLprivacyadvocate (Discussed changesets: 1) | Appears gone commented 2026-09-03 13:13:52 UTC by TuringYurtGb ♦1 |
| 188450365 (Comments: 1) | Friends of Hanlan's (Discussed changesets: 0) | let's try to keep these type of edits localized in the future... do a changeset in cali and a changeset in mass commented 2026-09-03 13:01:30 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 188467618 (Comments: 1) | Dyl's Travels (Discussed changesets: 1) | modifying nodes this far apart (Millville and Paterson??) in the same changeset is bad practice, man commented 2026-09-03 13:00:54 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 188318071 (Comments: 1) | washington_irving (Discussed changesets: 1) | Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188469607 commented 2026-09-03 12:37:53 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 175968072 (Comments: 1) | MapGirl_HannaH (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615635748/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:16 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 146657321 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 216) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1010709830/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:35:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188280378 (Comments: 1) | B1uu_ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188468514 commented 2026-09-03 12:16:11 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 181562484 (Comments: 1) | Scott Fraser (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825715450/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:15 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 169981111 (Comments: 1) | Daniel_Malloy (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1420079525/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 166809167 (Comments: 1) | duduewgdu (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1389986442/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:12 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 171637389 (Comments: 1) | Marc Toe (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1427974972/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:14:10 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 166274550 (Comments: 1) | cereal_cable (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330454095/history has building = utility that was added in this edit is building=utility a duplicate of more popular building=service ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 12:10:22 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 153609524 (Comments: 1) | brendan77 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205175062/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:43 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 145555306 (Comments: 1) | j_b_ (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724819073/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 133806332 (Comments: 1) | Jarrardi (Discussed changesets: 45) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761870854/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:41 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 180471896 (Comments: 1) | mvexel (Discussed changesets: 42) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523183252/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:39 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 139662243 (Comments: 1) | atlas-3d (Discussed changesets: 17) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161134877/history has building = disused that was added in this edit it really should be building= + disused=yes commented 2026-09-03 11:44:35 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188330862 (Comments: 2) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 6) | Block lifted as apparently an accidental change, not a bug commented 2026-09-03 11:00:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188330539 (Comments: 1) | ayanbs (Discussed changesets: 6) | Hello, Whenever it's happened to me, an "unexpected large number of changes" usually means that lots of things were selected and one of them was moved slightly. JOSM interprets that as "apply that to everything" and moves... commented 2026-09-03 10:45:39 UTC by SomeoneElse ♦13,865 |
| 188390700 (Comments: 1) | Leicham (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188459061 commented 2026-09-03 08:41:38 UTC by rajdhani ♦424 |
| 188177010 (Comments: 1) | The_Prot0type_01 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! What is the mean of the tags NOT surveillance = public bruh = 2025-05-19 ? commented 2026-09-03 07:54:31 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188456710 (Comments: 1) | indoztri (Discussed changesets: 1) | Included street entrance addresses, as they're often different from the buildings nearest to them. Added "house number" to each main building for same reason. commented 2026-09-03 07:51:47 UTC by indoztri ♦1 |
| 120997477 (Comments: 1) | MidwestMapGeek (Discussed changesets: 36) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:33 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 182492291 (Comments: 1) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 33) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 151335561 (Comments: 1) | TheDutchMan13 (Discussed changesets: 220) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 185876908 (Comments: 1) | wcedmisten (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:48:17 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 185615099 (Comments: 1) | Andrew Matheny (Discussed changesets: 22) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:58 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 179474580 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188308056 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 75) | Is ribbon an appropriate icon for oncologists within iD presets? Can you take look at https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2736#issuecomment-5355985226 and judge is it working well? (alternative is to keep generic doctor ico... commented 2026-09-03 07:47:49 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187776005 (Comments: 8) | Wildsharky (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hi AgileMaster, The agreed changes have now been made. The former alignment is tagged as disused:highway=track, and we’ve also added a note mentioning that it was discontinued at the 1977 Antrim Town Meeting. This way, the histori... commented 2026-09-03 06:31:18 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188448397 (Comments: 1) | Falkhorn (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, Are you sure what you saw was a Motorola ALPR? If not, then I can delete this. Thanks, BubbaJuice commented 2026-09-03 06:20:35 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦170 |
| 188220835 (Comments: 1) | archpdx (Discussed changesets: 67) | Thank you for contributing to Aloha High School commented 2026-09-03 05:55:00 UTC by 9142322 ♦5 |
| 188438117 (Comments: 1) | ~aflojun< (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious items and personal info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451814 commented 2026-09-03 05:14:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188437869 (Comments: 1) | ~aflojun< (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious items and personal info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451814 commented 2026-09-03 05:14:11 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188437438 (Comments: 2) | ~aflojun< (Discussed changesets: 3) | DWG revert - fictitious items and personal info https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188451814 commented 2026-09-03 05:14:10 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188449305 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:54 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449338 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:51 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449375 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:45 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449422 (Comments: 2) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:40 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188449514 (Comments: 1) | NoctZan (Discussed changesets: 13) | Also updated dog and phone tags commented 2026-09-03 03:18:28 UTC by NoctZan ♦12 |
| 188337411 (Comments: 2) | captainwacky (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! I see there's some maps from USDOT and utah.gov but I'm not sure which one I could use to import as a layer into JOSM to merge in that data. I've also been making most of my edits in the iD editor so it might take me some time t... commented 2026-09-03 01:35:32 UTC by captainwacky ♦1 |
| 141703407 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:19:06 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 167584789 (Comments: 1) | TheDutchMan13 (Discussed changesets: 220) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 141886909 (Comments: 1) | Kovirii (Discussed changesets: 33) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:51 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 180237681 (Comments: 1) | Brian'sPants (Discussed changesets: 4) | Do you think that https://pinhead.ink/#joint would work well to represent rheumatology in iD presets? See https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2734#issuecomment-5353968217 for how it would look like in editor I am ask... commented 2026-09-03 01:18:20 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 162166681 (Comments: 1) | kittttt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1356925827/history has building = home that was added in this edit is building=home a duplicate of more popular building=house ? Maybe changing to it would be fine? commented 2026-09-03 00:51:46 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188446464 (Comments: 1) | deepmind0804 (Discussed changesets: 1) | My first contribution, go easy on me commented 2026-09-03 00:32:41 UTC by deepmind0804 ♦1 |
| 188446238 (Comments: 1) | BubbaJuice (Discussed changesets: 81) | Based on survey. commented 2026-09-03 00:17:26 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦170 |
| 188419374 (Comments: 2) | Oregonian3 (Discussed changesets: 47) | It completes the loop, but what two cities does this actually form the "best" connection between? If someone is going to Golden from Broomfield I'd wager that most people would take I-25 to I-76 to I-70 rather than taking Highway 128 t... commented 2026-09-02 23:34:05 UTC by Oregonian3 ♦60 |
| 188151626 (Comments: 1) | neuhausr (Discussed changesets: 17) | I've had adding this building on my to-do list, so thanks for adding it! I've cleaned it up a bit in changeset/188445314 commented 2026-09-02 23:27:29 UTC by O1S ♦34 |
| 178843386 (Comments: 2) | m86 (Discussed changesets: 35) | Yes - it looks good. commented 2026-09-02 22:52:05 UTC by m86 ♦22 |
| 180424307 (Comments: 3) | geometrix (Discussed changesets: 1) | As the more local, would you like to delete the other OSM node for the same camera now? (Sounds like you'll be checking all 6; news says 4 including this one gone already and last 2 on sep 8 and 9, I think.) commented 2026-09-02 22:35:04 UTC by gdt ♦59 |
| 152565678 (Comments: 1) | aduxas (Discussed changesets: 12) | In OSM, access=private indicates a legal restriction on public access and should only be added when supported by verifiable evidence, such as gates, access control, “No Trespassing” signs, or other documented restrictions. In instances wh... commented 2026-09-02 22:20:40 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦188 |
| 188341556 (Comments: 2) | emeadows (Discussed changesets: 2) | capture_date_range is a field brought in via Microsoft Building footprints. It is automatically tagged when using the AI generated building footprints. In this case the footprints were generated from aerials captured from 6/1/2018-7/31/2018. I do not... commented 2026-09-02 22:12:10 UTC by emeadows ♦2 |
| 187418586 (Comments: 2) | hhartsoe (Discussed changesets: 6) | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV2H7eZ5-Mc commented 2026-09-02 21:49:50 UTC by hhartsoe ♦2 |
| 184201595 (Comments: 9) | OpenStreetGoober (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good catches, those are no longer under construction. I will remove those tags. Thank you! commented 2026-09-02 21:49:21 UTC by OpenStreetGoober ♦1 |
| 187454944 (Comments: 3) | Loopslol7 (Discussed changesets: 16) | absolutely no problem, these kind of typo is easy to spot commented 2026-09-02 21:30:47 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 179467205 (Comments: 3) | cuzi (Discussed changesets: 29) | Okay, thanks for confirming! Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-02 20:59:16 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188396089 (Comments: 2) | thatonedoge (Discussed changesets: 2) | they're owned by Crossroads, although i haven't been able to get them to admit that yet. Scheels has told me over the phone that they don't own them. thanks for keeping the map accurate with me :) if you are able to confirm ownership, ... commented 2026-09-02 20:30:49 UTC by thatonedoge ♦3 |
| 188437728 (Comments: 1) | OhHiNoU (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a real camera? commented 2026-09-02 20:11:33 UTC by DividedFrame ♦5 |
| 188036435 (Comments: 1) | Joshua Leclair (Discussed changesets: 1) | I do not believe this is accurate. There is no flock camera at this location on the side of the highway. There is no building or business here and Michigan is not putting up 1 camera in the middle of nowhere for some random reason. This Joshua person... commented 2026-09-02 19:02:06 UTC by A Michigan Resident ♦1 |
| 183783199 (Comments: 1) | PlainJane999 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM; I see you are pretty new. In june you added an ALPR here, and there is also one added in March: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180424307#map=19/42.556006/-71.485602&layers=N It seems likely there is only 1 c... commented 2026-09-02 19:00:52 UTC by gdt ♦59 |
| 187608410 (Comments: 1) | Jer spark (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a Flock ALPR camera. This is a Frost Solutions weather monitoring camera. https://www.frostsolutions.io/mini-weather-station commented 2026-09-02 19:00:02 UTC by McDreimiller ♦2 |
| 188274147 (Comments: 1) | CAPT JB (Discussed changesets: 1) | Does the shed really have an address? The address you added looks the same as the one on the house. commented 2026-09-02 18:20:19 UTC by pwbriggs ♦470 |
| 188427768 (Comments: 1) | jkrift (Discussed changesets: 6) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-02 18:16:23 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188427603 (Comments: 1) | jkrift (Discussed changesets: 6) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-02 18:15:20 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188382349 (Comments: 1) | thisisfranklin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for the contribution! The format +1-206-322-1717 is correct here in OpenStreetMap. I changed it back. commented 2026-09-02 18:00:14 UTC by pwbriggs ♦470 |
| 179155730 (Comments: 3) | gpserror (Discussed changesets: 61) | no, Carto is not influenced by that this is purely about how it shows up in editor commented 2026-09-02 17:54:01 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 188305470 (Comments: 1) | nbargolf (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hey nbar, I noticed your changes on this course, and I see that they can use a lot of improvement. Take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1553866095 for instance. Granted, the satellite imagery and course quality is really low for th... commented 2026-09-02 16:56:23 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188416809 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 6) | because half of the lehigh valley wasn't mapped properly until this decade commented 2026-09-02 16:50:53 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 188281522 (Comments: 1) | SabersKiss (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi there! I see you're adding lots of businesses, which is great, but I just wanted to let you know you've got the opening_hours format a bit off. There needs to be a colon between the hour and minute values, e.g. Mo-Fr 08:30-16:00. What yo... commented 2026-09-02 15:30:40 UTC by salisburymistake ♦31 |
| 187822911 (Comments: 2) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks for reaching out! I think it would be a very reasonable icon to use for martial arts gyms. Martial arts styles look very different, so some aren't going to have kicks (e.g. BJJ, judo, sumo, boxing, etc.), but I don't think there is o... commented 2026-09-02 15:27:34 UTC by lunar_jaws812 ♦18 |
| 188389714 (Comments: 1) | sun_lab (Discussed changesets: 4) | It's a good idea to include name=* on sidewalks the same as you would another carriageway on a road. This aids greatly with pedestrian instructions. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... commented 2026-09-02 13:47:15 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188394908 (Comments: 1) | Yizhi Liang (Discussed changesets: 1) | We generally don't abbreviate in street names, since computers are good at making abbreviations when desired but bad at telling things like "Mount" and "Mountain" apart or "Street," "Saint" and "Sault... commented 2026-09-02 13:46:18 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 183379732 (Comments: 2) | willkmis (Discussed changesets: 24) | I think it's suitable for iD presets. As mentioned in the PR, it's probably not quite representative of all martial arts but it gets the point across. commented 2026-09-02 11:20:51 UTC by willkmis ♦229 |
| 186480742 (Comments: 2) | MikeN (Discussed changesets: 19) | I think the icon represents the overall category well, even if some activities do not look quite like that. commented 2026-09-02 10:54:59 UTC by MikeN ♦370 |
| 188410421 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 6) | Tagged from the beginning of Ponce to the Wells Street and North Clarendon Avenue intersection. commented 2026-09-02 10:11:45 UTC by h234a2hm ♦6 |
| 187007833 (Comments: 1) | Overcomzr (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, what is a "highway_loop"? This tag is not used in any other place. commented 2026-09-02 09:42:41 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 106763941 (Comments: 2) | Minh Nguyen (Discussed changesets: 184) | Thanks for reaching out. Seems reasonable to me. Some disciplines aren’t primarily about kicking (for example, Limalama), but I suppose a kicking icon would be more recognizable than one depicting punches or holds. Maybe in the future there cou... commented 2026-09-02 08:59:38 UTC by Minh Nguyen ♦653 |
| 52459373 (Comments: 1) | redsteakraw (Discussed changesets: 8) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:48:08 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 175524648 (Comments: 1) | impiaaa (Discussed changesets: 29) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:53 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 167468390 (Comments: 1) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 230) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:30 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 185973359 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 216) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:27 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 166638330 (Comments: 1) | KelsonV (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:19 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 185442730 (Comments: 1) | MapSpot (Discussed changesets: 75) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:47:14 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 130191308 (Comments: 1) | Timothy Smith (Discussed changesets: 325) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:57 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 172319428 (Comments: 1) | daniel_solow (Discussed changesets: 59) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:50 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187672668 (Comments: 1) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 138) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:48 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 186039333 (Comments: 1) | HJUdall (Discussed changesets: 14) | Hello! You used amenity=dojo multiple times (including in this preset) I want to ask you for advise about its icon in presets (wider discussion in https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/2773 ) Would https://pinhead.ink/... commented 2026-09-02 08:46:42 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 187017002 (Comments: 1) | VikasChandra_Lyft (Discussed changesets: 2) | Parkway drive was converted to have southbound traffic to only be able to turn onto US 85 north, this is a brand new configuration. commented 2026-09-02 07:25:00 UTC by GarliccBread1 ♦9 |
| 188395525 (Comments: 1) | SwiftersEdge (Discussed changesets: 1) | Is this a real Flock camera? The City of Springfield canceled the contract and all Flock cameras were removed. commented 2026-09-02 06:05:49 UTC by Adam850 ♦10 |
| 188379962 (Comments: 1) | whats9plus1021youstupid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, These two buildings have been tagged with this building=* and layer=* by experienced mappers for the past six years, and this is apparently the standard convention for such per this comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/10905256... commented 2026-09-02 05:39:05 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188342780 (Comments: 2) | jdouglass (Discussed changesets: 1) | Understood, thanks for the update! commented 2026-09-02 04:49:32 UTC by jdouglass ♦1 |
| 188375513 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188375252 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188397600 (Comments: 2) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:48 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188373344 (Comments: 1) | Mayor Dima Kishenko (Discussed changesets: 4) | DWG revert - Apparent sock-puppet vandalism https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188397818 commented 2026-09-02 03:17:47 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188397067 (Comments: 1) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 4) | Correction/clarification: the source referenced in the changeset comment is the MTA 2025–2029 Capital Plan, not a “2025 Capital Plan.” The Central Branch electrification project was included in the MTA 2020–2024 Capital Progra... commented 2026-09-02 02:43:30 UTC by jg027 ♦5 |
| 178769536 (Comments: 1) | thompsonrestoration (Discussed changesets: 1) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-02 02:14:46 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188341190 (Comments: 1) | ben_harris369 (Discussed changesets: 1) | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Waterways/River_modernization indicates that only the waterway ways should have a name and the water areas should be unnamed. at least one or two bridges now end in the water too. this should be ... commented 2026-09-01 23:17:23 UTC by OddlyAngled ♦137 |
| 187417229 (Comments: 1) | Fuckflock6557 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Fuckflock6557, I observed this intersection today and I saw no ALPR present. Are you sure what you saw was an ALPR? Reference https://deflock.org/identify for future identifications. Thank you, BubbaJuice commented 2026-09-01 22:57:41 UTC by BubbaJuice ♦170 |
| 188380058 (Comments: 1) | Tuwewanzi (Discussed changesets: 6) | 211 iD 2.42.2 commented 2026-09-01 22:25:46 UTC by Jesera ♦1 |
| 188330939 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330948 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:58 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330955 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:58 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330970 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:57 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330965 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:57 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188330978 (Comments: 1) | Deflocktheflock1234 (Discussed changesets: 19) | We were contacted previously about node removals and would like to revert these additional changes until you verify these have been truly removed.\r \r Please feel free to DM or respond here with affirmation the nodes were removed physically fr... commented 2026-09-01 22:06:56 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 188340770 (Comments: 1) | CacheValleySystems (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Since you requested a review, I looked over your changes. In this case, could a visitor from the public show up to your office here for services? Anyway, tagging looks good! commented 2026-09-01 20:40:15 UTC by Xvtn ♦507 |
| 188375817 (Comments: 1) | wlgann (Discussed changesets: 13) | Oops, this was houses not fences. commented 2026-09-01 20:33:00 UTC by wlgann ♦5 |
| 188311765 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 6) | if it's got a name i'm not so sure commented 2026-09-01 19:56:27 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 188280703 (Comments: 1) | CurlingMan13 (Discussed changesets: 216) | this is great - thanks CurlingMan. Impressed you spotted new imagery for Metuchen HS this quickly commented 2026-09-01 19:56:20 UTC by mbeyerle ♦51 |
| 188311819 (Comments: 1) | tooeasy (Discussed changesets: 6) | atleast mark it unpaved... it's clearly not a "driveway" commented 2026-09-01 19:55:45 UTC by dmjab13 ♦143 |
| 186479624 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 38) | Hey, thanks for reaching out and cooperating--I definitely appreciate it, since the vast majority of SEO accounts don't. Yup, should be--if you do happen to make a good-faith mistake, I can fix them for you. Just make sure to use this sam... commented 2026-09-01 18:37:04 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 181653723 (Comments: 1) | sadadada (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OpenStreetMap! In the future, when mapping things like buildings, consider using the "square" tool (shortcut Q in iD) so they aren't weirdly shaped polygons. Happy mapping! commented 2026-09-01 18:26:19 UTC by neuhausr ♦364 |
| 188323002 (Comments: 3) | nuclearifle (Discussed changesets: 1) | They're not even near the stoplight poles. Though most stoplights (including all that were that were installed or upgraded in the last 20 years) feature video traffic detection (they don't record) and I have seen some incorrectly mapped as... commented 2026-09-01 17:18:13 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 187863675 (Comments: 3) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 39) | To be clearer, the property to the west is not a church, it's the tech center. commented 2026-09-01 16:36:27 UTC by dannmer ♦34 |
| 188327716 (Comments: 3) | bally213 (Discussed changesets: 3) | The issues have been fixed in changeset/188368312. commented 2026-09-01 16:10:20 UTC by Flynn Marquardt ♦82 |
| 187800360 (Comments: 1) | flockfinderUSofA (Discussed changesets: 2) | This is likely not a flock camera but Walmart's internal security. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187800360 commented 2026-09-01 16:01:12 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 187800819 (Comments: 1) | flockfinderUSofA (Discussed changesets: 2) | I think you tagged traffic detection cameras (which do not record, only monitor the queuing area for waiting vehicles) incorrectly as flock cameras. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https:... commented 2026-09-01 15:54:49 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188219965 (Comments: 1) | Ryan4n6 (Discussed changesets: 3) | You have made a common error when you saw a fairway that looked like it didn't have a proper "Feature Type" defined and decided to add the fairway tag. The hole was already properly tagged, but was part of a relation of multiple object... commented 2026-09-01 15:34:52 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 187857076 (Comments: 2) | dametenshi (Discussed changesets: 3) | 🤦 You’re totally right. My apologies 🙏 commented 2026-09-01 15:26:22 UTC by dametenshi ♦1 |
| 188370948 (Comments: 1) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 119) | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 188049395, 188124458, 188192727, 188218482, 188222822, 188222974, 188222995, 188223306, 188224949, 188225996, 188227719, 188240075, 188243567, 188244354, 188248713, 188248763, 188248853, 188... commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188244354 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188248763 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188243567 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188337835 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188269728 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:24 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188218482 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276545 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276623 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188278565 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188275080 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188222822 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277898 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188370779 (Comments: 2) | woodpeck (Discussed changesets: 119) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:23 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188312078 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188251090 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188251183 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188274221 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188274621 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276882 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188279497 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188222974 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:22 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188279858 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188223306 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276823 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277369 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188254659 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276566 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188258779 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:21 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188270269 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188280290 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188268155 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188268061 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277827 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188280977 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188222995 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:20 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188271798 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277161 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188277694 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188271499 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188310290 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188240075 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276411 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188225996 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:19 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188227719 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188248853 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188049395 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188257974 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188224949 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276941 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188124458 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:18 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188271779 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188192727 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188248713 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188276313 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188280244 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:17 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188280394 (Comments: 3) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188310363 (Comments: 2) | Dima gamer12 (Discussed changesets: 57) | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 188370948 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional edits, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/21215 commented 2026-09-01 15:15:16 UTC by woodpeck ♦3,134 |
| 188167716 (Comments: 2) | ItsTheDangWind (Discussed changesets: 1) | I am working on an OpenTripPlanner implementation and the walking direction routing is not appropriately mapping the walk routing. It seems like the platform is not properly mapped to the walking network. It was my understanding that relating the con... commented 2026-09-01 15:06:22 UTC by ItsTheDangWind ♦1 |
| 187872900 (Comments: 1) | freefloatz (Discussed changesets: 3) | In this case it would have been better to split the untagged boundary where it overlaps with the fence, and then tag that section as fence (keeping it a part of the multipolygon) than it is to draw over. --- ... commented 2026-09-01 15:06:00 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 184703336 (Comments: 1) | StopWatchingUs (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi StopWatchingUs, I passed through this intersection a few days ago, and I believe I saw the cameras you were referring to. I think these are just traffic cameras, not manufactured by flock. Do you have evidence this is a flock model cam... commented 2026-09-01 14:56:15 UTC by SherbetS ♦172 |
| 188011712 (Comments: 1) | Bradinator (Discussed changesets: 5) | I added the street names, sidewalks should include name=* when the name of the street is known. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188011712 commented 2026-09-01 14:52:37 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188046448 (Comments: 1) | 1MattG (Discussed changesets: 2) | Abbreviations aren't used in street names or addr:street. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188046448 commented 2026-09-01 14:23:50 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188057265 (Comments: 1) | RandomizedNoise (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you moved the camera to the southbound left lane of the street, which doesn't seem likely. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188057265 ... commented 2026-09-01 14:16:26 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 187764834 (Comments: 1) | Dark Phantom (Discussed changesets: 3) | Where is the source that "Dartmouth College Police" operates this camera? "Dartmouth College Police" is not an actual organization. "Dartmouth College Safety and Security" is. It seems highly unlikely that Dartmouth C... commented 2026-09-01 13:05:19 UTC by bicoid ♦1 |
| 188226967 (Comments: 1) | Sanches12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188343722 commented 2026-09-01 12:28:27 UTC by Wildsharky ♦926 |
| 188356995 (Comments: 1) | RM23 (Discussed changesets: 5) | If Bings the eye in the sky... Who has their ear to the ground? commented 2026-09-01 10:51:21 UTC by Nicki Grider ♦1 |
| 188349001 (Comments: 1) | TheNightRider (Discussed changesets: 41) | Oops! I accidentally checked the review_requested box and saw it the moment I hit the upload button. No review needed. Sorry! commented 2026-09-01 08:02:58 UTC by TheNightRider ♦75 |
| 188337543 (Comments: 3) | jlgsea (Discussed changesets: 1) | Thanks for clarifying. That's an interesting building. Since it's technically one structure, I've gone ahead and redrawn the outline from the aerial imagery. Generally with retail tenants, we're just adding or modifying a node for... commented 2026-09-01 05:59:49 UTC by extraordinarymachine ♦1 |
| 188231545 (Comments: 3) | Sam2521 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just as a heads up for node 14134388882, I converted "Mo-Sat 09:30-17:30, Sun 13:00-5:30" to "Mo-Sa 09:30-17:30; Su 13:00-17:30" because I'm assuming that Mo-Sa and Su both close at 17:30 PM instead of Su closing at 5:30 AM..... commented 2026-09-01 05:41:47 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188325060 (Comments: 1) | cbhizz12 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Wasn't this removed? commented 2026-09-01 05:36:58 UTC by Adam850 ♦10 |
| 188114076 (Comments: 1) | Karen@Digible (Discussed changesets: 1) | When specifying buildings as apartments, please use building=apartments tag instead of landuse=residential, residential=apartments. I have added the building tag back commented 2026-09-01 05:02:51 UTC by alexwohlbruck ♦24 |
| 188339360 (Comments: 1) | UnFlockMeNow (Discussed changesets: 1) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-09-01 04:39:12 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188054728 (Comments: 2) | icarus72180 (Discussed changesets: 1) | thank you so much! yes, you are right, i got way too excited, and tbh, they are fun to make.... when they work. I did notice you fixed one, thank you, it made me think, hey... im not doing this right. so i did what i should have and read the wiki.... commented 2026-09-01 03:53:19 UTC by icarus72180 ♦2 |
| 188302677 (Comments: 1) | iShootPhotos (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, just so you're aware, the phone number formatting you edited isn't the accepted formatting (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#United_States). Just so you're aware for future work. Thanks for adding POIs in t... commented 2026-09-01 03:07:14 UTC by SD Mapman ♦93 |
| 188170785 (Comments: 2) | PiXeLStick (Discussed changesets: 1) | Just to clarify, the value was correct except it was just missing the colon (::") separator between the values and the minutes. It seems you've already been going around fixing them, thanks! There were a handful of remaining opening_... commented 2026-09-01 03:02:13 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188315238 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | Thanks, but NB, they already had a POI node here, node 14127937701 added in changeset 188082813 , which you already cleaned up a few days ago, in changeset 188109030 . Therefore, I removed this newer duplicate in changeset 188339698 . https://... commented 2026-09-01 02:47:37 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188287076 (Comments: 1) | Peak Performance Partners (Discussed changesets: 3) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-09-01 02:47:09 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188328369 (Comments: 1) | bmrell (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, I saw you requested a review for this edit. For the most part its a good addition, but you didn't connect the roads together. When connected the intersections between roads should be gray. Also, don't abbreviate names (we leave abbrevia... commented 2026-09-01 02:21:32 UTC by Jonathan Delaney ♦11 |
| 161477661 (Comments: 2) | UW Amy Bordenave (Discussed changesets: 4) | When `highway=traffic_signals` is mapped either at the intersection node or at each approach, and when the `crossing:markings=*` and `crossing:signals=*` tags are present, there is no good reason to add the older-style `crossing=*` tag, as its value ... commented 2026-09-01 02:12:00 UTC by UW Amy Bordenave ♦5 |
| 188151352 (Comments: 1) | Zandor469 (Discussed changesets: 1) | This is not a flock camera. commented 2026-09-01 00:56:47 UTC by Daniel Wiser ♦1 |
| 185915483 (Comments: 1) | PowerFan (Discussed changesets: 2) | Did you possible accidentally undelete the transmission towers? There are a bunch of towers on the map now where there are none (presumably because it's an underground line) commented 2026-08-31 23:21:20 UTC by hobbesvsboyle ♦21 |
| 174962716 (Comments: 1) | Danfox Davies (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, I think these should be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_pitch . I have fixed this. commented 2026-08-31 21:22:57 UTC by wombatmaper ♦115 |
| 188326530 (Comments: 1) | Meowcat285 (Discussed changesets: 2) | I misspelled entrance, whoops commented 2026-08-31 19:47:27 UTC by Meowcat285 ♦2 |
| 188263849 (Comments: 1) | dannmer (Discussed changesets: 39) | Oh, this is such a nice rest stop, albeit small. I appreciate you giving it some love! commented 2026-08-31 19:46:53 UTC by Pap_Redpaw ♦1 |
| 187610041 (Comments: 1) | whats9plus1021youstupid (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello. Could you please elaborate on your change here? Why did you remove roof:height= tag and change the height= tag? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187610041 ... commented 2026-08-31 19:44:22 UTC by MxxCon ♦3,581 |
| 183167839 (Comments: 4) | lunar_jaws812 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-31 19:44:11 UTC by Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,583 |
| 174205168 (Comments: 1) | Zol87 (Discussed changesets: 75) | Thanks for adding these. FYI I fixed two of them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188322106#map=15/41.85318/-88.32548&layers=T commented 2026-08-31 19:34:30 UTC by BataviaBusStopFixes ♦1 |
| 188314248 (Comments: 1) | alexz12548 (Discussed changesets: 1) | I can upload documents but I'm not sure how commented 2026-08-31 18:25:42 UTC by alexz12548 ♦1 |
| 188312398 (Comments: 1) | sfrank78 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Can you use the highway=construction tag for streets still under construction going forward? Thanks! commented 2026-08-31 18:09:14 UTC by acschind ♦2 |
| 188319949 (Comments: 1) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | These seem more like access=private than foot=no, being random farm tracks. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188319949 commented 2026-08-31 18:07:02 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188320590 (Comments: 1) | Killian Bath (Discussed changesets: 3) | Is this prohibition posted anywhere? Under state law, if it's not posted as prohibiting pedestrians, and there's no minimum speed limit, it is open to pedestrians. --- Published using OSMCha: h... commented 2026-08-31 18:06:09 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188126163 (Comments: 1) | GeoSafe-Dustin (Discussed changesets: 2) | Phone numbers use ITU format, for example, +1 539 529 4700 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188126163 commented 2026-08-31 17:40:21 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188146262 (Comments: 1) | KingGISard and the lizard wizard (Discussed changesets: 1) | I'm not quite sure what you were trying to map here, could you give me a hint? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188146262 commented 2026-08-31 17:26:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188162253 (Comments: 1) | gncnpk (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi something about your mapping of Normandale has broken the rendering. I don't do a lot of indoor mapping myself, so encourage you to review https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging to confirm recommended editing. One thing I d... commented 2026-08-31 17:02:28 UTC by neuhausr ♦364 |
| 163103803 (Comments: 1) | Ayumu "Osaka" Kasuga (Discussed changesets: 37) | Looks like a couple dozen buildings in Hominy, Osage Nation got added as single, pangea-buildings. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163103803 commented 2026-08-31 16:54:19 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188305937 (Comments: 1) | motov8 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hello, thanks for the contribution. However, Lake Ontario already exists in OSM, so it doesn't need to be duplicated. Furthermore, the name 'Lake America' is not the commonly used and accepted name of the lake, which is what the ... commented 2026-08-31 16:53:33 UTC by sykul ♦93 |
| 188278425 (Comments: 2) | J-Co-De (Discussed changesets: 1) | Additionally, please remember to actually review the tags on an object, in this case, the note tag on this object explained the situation. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.o... commented 2026-08-31 16:52:55 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 188311879 (Comments: 1) | jkrift (Discussed changesets: 6) | looking at this ALPR on various aerial imagery in iD it seems to be within the road area, being positioned like this is highly unlikely so please double check the position of this ALPR and fix it. Happy mapping, Udar. commented 2026-08-31 16:06:08 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188302186 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:59:02 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188302080 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:58:41 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188302060 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:56:58 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 188301921 (Comments: 1) | BonesTM (Discussed changesets: 7) | manufacturer:wikidata=* should have an actual wikidata id "Q108485435" is one "Sentio" is not. Please check what the actual wikidata entry for "Sentio" is and update the tag with it. see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wik... commented 2026-08-31 15:48:31 UTC by Udarian ♦918 |
| 187823948 (Comments: 1) | trevb312 (Discussed changesets: 1) | FYI, you shouldn't compose greens like the 10th by combining two polygons with a hole in the middle for a bunker. Look into how to construct multipolygon relations in the future. (Reach out if you need help.) commented 2026-08-31 15:46:13 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188156549 (Comments: 1) | neuhausr (Discussed changesets: 17) | Thanks for fixing these! commented 2026-08-31 15:29:19 UTC by ion_chi ♦91 |
| 188105662 (Comments: 3) | Ras_Iva (Discussed changesets: 1) | The roads are under construction, so I updated the street names and Tags based on the comments that were provided. commented 2026-08-31 14:11:09 UTC by Ras_Iva ♦1 |
| 187646131 (Comments: 6) | William Baxter (Discussed changesets: 1) | I completely agree with you. This is not an OSM issue and the node was fairly accurate. That doesn’t mean people aren’t actively misunderstanding what this node actually represents via the Deflock application. As to my understanding a flo... commented 2026-08-31 14:03:03 UTC by William Baxter ♦1 |
| 170455435 (Comments: 2) | GMoney0805 (Discussed changesets: 22) | Good morning….that would be my mistake. Back when I made these changes….i read that the transition from minor line to power line was at 41.6. I looked it up again as soon as I saw your message, and I see it’s now between 45 and 50... commented 2026-08-31 13:51:00 UTC by GMoney0805 ♦8 |
| 187715365 (Comments: 13) | GA_Kevin (Discussed changesets: 18) | @:BHSPitMonkey This changeset was done with JOSM, not iD, which starts to warn you when the number of changes gets too large. Also, it would not be good practice to do a continent-wide edit in one changeset, unless it was an automated edit that was p... commented 2026-08-31 09:58:45 UTC by TheNightRider ♦75 |
| 188293794 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 428) | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188294370 commented 2026-08-31 09:28:37 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188294118 (Comments: 1) | user_5359 (Discussed changesets: 428) | see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188294370 commented 2026-08-31 09:28:29 UTC by user_5359 ♦20,833 |
| 188289771 (Comments: 1) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! Using another technique compared to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188277116, I cut the roads up to segments around this plot of land. I used this segments to draw parallel lines (feature of JOSM), like an inset then recombined th... commented 2026-08-31 07:52:08 UTC by 'Lex ♦6 |
| 187670266 (Comments: 2) | NeeDiva (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've gone ahead and retagged these segments with maxspeed:advisory commented 2026-08-31 06:54:24 UTC by archpdx ♦554 |
| 179456268 (Comments: 2) | RailandSea (Discussed changesets: 20) | I do know there’s a dead section after you leave MNR trackage going west on the Amtrak hell gate. The books and the trains show 13+ KV on the power voltage I believe there was discussion about this before to settle on the 13KV power. commented 2026-08-31 05:05:02 UTC by RailandSea ♦26 |
| 188260270 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-31 04:31:43 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188207117 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS at Rochester (Discussed changesets: 2) | SEO spam, advertising and mistagging by commercial mappers is strictly prohibited on OpenStreetMap and is subject to immediate removal and possible further consequences for your account. Please see https://osm.wiki/About_OpenStreetMap_for_SEO_mappers... commented 2026-08-31 04:31:39 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188209646 (Comments: 2) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 4) | I think you're right. My bad. I'll revert my edits accordingly. commented 2026-08-31 03:22:36 UTC by jg027 ♦5 |
| 185825485 (Comments: 8) | jg027 (Discussed changesets: 4) | All good :) commented 2026-08-31 03:16:37 UTC by RailandSea ♦26 |
| 188226268 (Comments: 2) | Jake Bridges (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188280176 commented 2026-08-31 02:12:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 187515049 (Comments: 1) | Jake Bridges (Discussed changesets: 2) | DWG revert - apparent fictitious names https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188280176 commented 2026-08-31 02:12:06 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188277116 (Comments: 1) | 'Lex (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi! I'm used to see multipolygon landuses on the countryside (Hungary) and these plots around the area are kinda perfect for them. What is the standard in the USA? I have seen the other usual methods as well: landuses running parallel with ro... commented 2026-08-30 23:56:38 UTC by 'Lex ♦6 |
| 187002098 (Comments: 35) | carciofo (Discussed changesets: 21) | To answer the question, no. With the previous version of this intersection (the one you reverted it back to), there were no turn restrictions needed for the intersection. When FDot put plastic bollards in, creating 2 separate turn lanes, then a turn ... commented 2026-08-30 22:42:29 UTC by txemt ♦86 |
| 188271351 (Comments: 1) | peterthiellover (Discussed changesets: 1) | Are these actual Flock cameras? commented 2026-08-30 21:56:09 UTC by DividedFrame ♦5 |
| 188167633 (Comments: 2) | boykisser (Discussed changesets: 1) | tysm!!!! i've changed the time to 26:00 and removed the note :3 commented 2026-08-30 20:29:50 UTC by boykisser ♦1 |
| 188232610 (Comments: 1) | Chor Lee (Discussed changesets: 1) | Flock is not known to be operating in Alaska. commented 2026-08-30 19:43:38 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 186539624 (Comments: 1) | candidecoating (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi candidecoating,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-30 19:10:43 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 187916194 (Comments: 1) | Jwheels98765 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey there J, You were doing some unorthodox things with breaking a fairway into two pieces: one around the fairway and one around the green and then relating them with a multipolygon. This is rather nonstandard and should be avoided. I've... commented 2026-08-30 16:55:41 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188206295 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 138) | Fixed, thanks for the heads up. commented 2026-08-30 15:59:15 UTC by Omnific ♦237 |
| 188205849 (Comments: 2) | Omnific (Discussed changesets: 138) | Fixed, thanks for the heads up. commented 2026-08-30 15:58:03 UTC by Omnific ♦237 |
| 188223938 (Comments: 1) | PUFFZ (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM PUFFZ. I've modified your changes a bit here. Please modify existing features instead of drawing a second fairway on top of an existing fairway (or green over green). You don't need to "name" the green &... commented 2026-08-30 15:03:31 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188200117 (Comments: 1) | lbilldt (Discussed changesets: 4) | You actually don't want to be tagging the outer ring of hole 1's multipolygon as a "fairway". The description of the fairway lies on the multipolygon relation itself. See this wiki for help in understanding: https://wiki.openstree... commented 2026-08-30 14:51:36 UTC by b-jazz ♦942 |
| 188251134 (Comments: 1) | Baloo Uriza (Discussed changesets: 109) | Sorry, changeset comment should read "fast and easy building fixes." commented 2026-08-30 14:34:33 UTC by Baloo Uriza ♦2,560 |
| 186884736 (Comments: 5) | 0235 (Discussed changesets: 11) | Oh no, i understand that it was not this singular building that is the issue, but the data is correct. it shows the rectangular building. So the images are not obsolete, there is no square building, which is why i am doubly confused that it wa... commented 2026-08-30 10:41:52 UTC by 0235 ♦51 |
| 186891688 (Comments: 1) | jollybubbly (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, please check the socket tags you added here. 'socket:type' is not a valid tag, 'type' needs to be replaced with the actual type of the socket. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14071364390#map=19/36.760093/-118.901807 commented 2026-08-30 08:54:00 UTC by mueschel ♦7,309 |
| 188215453 (Comments: 2) | dima monsky (Discussed changesets: 19) | Hi mewhenthe, it is plastic covered (warehouse?) i saw here https://youtu.be/kuJ3o8To140?t=1250 maybe temporary? commented 2026-08-30 07:18:57 UTC by dima monsky ♦14 |
| 188126660 (Comments: 2) | Yep It's Me (Discussed changesets: 1) | @PostaMap_Infinite ... Thank you 🙏🏼. I'm a noob, with those being some of my first edits after joining. I appreciate your guidance and help! commented 2026-08-30 06:05:53 UTC by Yep It's Me ♦1 |
| 187817293 (Comments: 1) | Zcubed (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, could you please clarify if the service_times tag hours for the church apply to a specific day? Currently, the tag is not valid because it doesn't apply to a specific day. For example if this church has service times only on Sunday, t... commented 2026-08-30 05:53:42 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188154815 (Comments: 1) | matthewCmatt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi! Please note that opening_hours=* hours timespans must be written in hh:mm format, even for single digit hours. It's also standard practice to separate rules that don't interfere with each other with a semicolon, even if using a comma is... commented 2026-08-30 05:11:23 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188227668 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 26) | *Hallmark XD commented 2026-08-30 04:34:59 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188098874 (Comments: 2) | Melody5291 (Discussed changesets: 1) | DWG revert of all CS - apparent fictitious mapping & improper deletions: 188227531 commented 2026-08-30 04:27:46 UTC by Fizzie-DWG ♦34,812 |
| 188225804 (Comments: 1) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | This area actually represents a planning district, not necessarily a single place with a distinct identity. Therefore, this entire area would (likely) be better tagged as place=borough. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/188227298 commented 2026-08-30 04:12:03 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188226038 (Comments: 1) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 66) | Hi Mitch, just a reminder, per what I mentioned to you on a few of your previous changesets, when there is a single node for an object and you want to map the outline of the building or campus, please keep the node (without its tags) in the outline (... commented 2026-08-30 03:55:40 UTC by Frank Peng ♦229 |
| 178167355 (Comments: 1) | compdude (Discussed changesets: 8) | relation/20180240 doesn't need to be a multipolygon - it could just be two separate areas. Pushing changeset that converts each line to an area soon. commented 2026-08-30 02:50:28 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 182468891 (Comments: 1) | hanhdbui (Discussed changesets: 1) | As a general practice in OSM, access restrictions like foot=no should only be added when there is clear on-the-ground signage or another verifiable legal basis. The absence of a sidewalk does not, by itself, mean that pedestrians are prohibited. In t... commented 2026-08-30 02:38:25 UTC by StreetSurveyor ♦188 |
| 187914209 (Comments: 1) | MoeDirt (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, this node can be taken down. I drove by today and got a more exact location for the camera and made a new node. Sorry for any trouble, I just wanted to give the best reporting possible. commented 2026-08-30 02:15:28 UTC by MoeDirt ♦1 |
| 188224386 (Comments: 2) | Jacoblightning3 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Also It appears that JOSM discarded the descriptions from the other edits I made: For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18888637/history/15: Add Recommended (advisory) maxspeed For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16464769/history/3... commented 2026-08-30 01:37:55 UTC by Jacoblightning3 ♦1 |
| 165474658 (Comments: 1) | goldfndr (Discussed changesets: 51) | Did you mean to make way/6462234 into a retaining wall? Not editing since I don't want to destroy any tags that should be moved elsewhere. commented 2026-08-30 01:17:42 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 183903543 (Comments: 1) | Anonymous897234 (Discussed changesets: 16) | Looks like this changeset introduced way/1528039485. But way/428005364 has already had cycleway=lane for 10 years. commented 2026-08-30 01:01:57 UTC by KTibow ♦8 |
| 188221190 (Comments: 1) | MiddleverseAI (Discussed changesets: 1) | I've deleted the node - It was placed in the middle of the street and the tags were wrong. I suggest you read the wiki.openstreetmap.org for how to contribute correctly. commented 2026-08-30 00:37:20 UTC by Glassman ♦6,031 |
| 188218459 (Comments: 1) | Sage Dryer Vent (Discussed changesets: 1) | reverted - seo spam - these are residential homes commented 2026-08-30 00:31:06 UTC by Glassman ♦6,031 |
| 183230708 (Comments: 1) | JuletDeltaKilo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi JuletDeltaKilo,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:41:26 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 183227702 (Comments: 1) | JuletDeltaKilo (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi JuletDeltaKilo,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:41:25 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 181858548 (Comments: 1) | CameraCheckerLocal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CameraCheckerLocal,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 181787430 (Comments: 1) | CameraCheckerLocal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi CameraCheckerLocal,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:59 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 182490136 (Comments: 1) | Fauxheroes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fauxheroes,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:35 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 182490062 (Comments: 1) | Fauxheroes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Fauxheroes,\r \r The country that these nodes are placed in does not currently operate any Flock ALPR. \r \r https://deflock.org/identify is an excellent resource for identifying ALPRs.\r \r - alpacaMaps commented 2026-08-29 23:40:34 UTC by alpacaMaps ♦339 |
| 174439499 (Comments: 1) | NTLOSM (Discussed changesets: 1) | This camera location has been removed. commented 2026-08-29 22:25:01 UTC by deflockfremont ♦2 |
| 181946439 (Comments: 1) | allthepotatoes (Discussed changesets: 2) | This camera location has been removed. commented 2026-08-29 22:23:59 UTC by deflockfremont ♦2 |
| 186884304 (Comments: 2) | 0235 (Discussed changesets: 11) | They are a mappable Areoway feature, so get mapped. Places use data on parking spaces. commented 2026-08-29 21:59:30 UTC by 0235 ♦51 |
| 162149265 (Comments: 3) | iismitch55 (Discussed changesets: 66) | View this changeset on OSMCha, which may be easier to review, and shows you the map objects created, modified, or deleted in this changeset immediately rather than in FacilMap, where it takes longer to show them depending on the amount of objects cha... commented 2026-08-29 21:07:44 UTC by Frank Peng ♦229 |
| 181116939 (Comments: 3) | FlamingoOSM (Discussed changesets: 44) | Thanks, I wasn't sure if there wasn't a subdivision actually called West Pam Beach or not. commented 2026-08-29 21:06:16 UTC by JeroenHoek ♦797 |
| 188114223 (Comments: 2) | mcnv (Discussed changesets: 3) | I'm trying to follow what you're saying here. I didn't add the cartpath or the stream, those were already tagged. As I was reviewing the course I kept seeing warnings about the cart path going over the stream, and at one point I adde... commented 2026-08-29 20:10:26 UTC by mcnv ♦2 |
| 186840266 (Comments: 4) | watmildon (Discussed changesets: 51) | I appreciate you mentioning it! commented 2026-08-29 18:54:58 UTC by watmildon ♦318 |
| 120768351 (Comments: 2) | PhilNi (Discussed changesets: 5) | Agreed. Just a mistake on my part. No need to comment, just fix it. I’d (and OSM) schema has changed a bit when I first did my sidewalks and accessibility changes so just go ahead and update. I’ve been going over some of them myself a... commented 2026-08-29 17:37:07 UTC by PhilNi ♦4 |
| 188124456 (Comments: 1) | User-2945 (Discussed changesets: 6) | A highway should only be classified as a motorway if, among many other things, it is divided. This means there must be a physical barrier between the directions of travel. Since this segment of Southern Parkway lacks a physical barrier between its ca... commented 2026-08-29 17:32:55 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188202224 (Comments: 3) | b-jazz (Discussed changesets: 93) | Thanks! commented 2026-08-29 16:37:04 UTC by schobbish ♦80 |
| 188197746 (Comments: 4) | Joseph R P (Discussed changesets: 230) | I see. These edge cases really should be documented somewhere on the OSM Wiki. If you recall, I also upgraded a short segment of Galleria to primary for the same reason (I have since reversed that change) since an Interstate is, in my opinion, even m... commented 2026-08-29 16:15:07 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188178282 (Comments: 3) | Robert Hardin (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi thanks for the reply! I'd suggest changing the path type to =path rather the removing it. Let me know if you need help doing that. commented 2026-08-29 16:12:42 UTC by MassCartog ♦465 |
| 187966730 (Comments: 4) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | I see. Well, I guess I'll have to re-downgrade this segment to highway=primary then. Since TRINA 2.0's map displaying AADT is broken, I've been trying to recreate it (on my own .OSM file) using data from NDOT's traffic stat... commented 2026-08-29 15:36:25 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188020731 (Comments: 3) | Huong Dang (Discussed changesets: 9) | I get where you're coming from on the routing part. That's actually why I switched to the conditional access tags. A lot of OSM-based maps and routers only update their data every month at best, so a 2-day closure can turn into a month+ clo... commented 2026-08-29 13:37:24 UTC by ion_chi ♦91 |
| 188107486 (Comments: 1) | Aaron Shafer (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I noticed you accidentally made an invalid opening_hours=* tag. For node 14129261827 "Tue-Thu 8-6 Fri-Sat- 8-8" should actually be formatted as "Tu-Th 08:00-18:00; Fr-Sa 08:00-20:00".... commented 2026-08-29 07:15:41 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 160860018 (Comments: 1) | jdmontes (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hello jdmontes, The opening_hours value for RHS Cafe is invalid. "7:15 - 7:30 also Durring both Lunches" does not follow the proper syntax for opening_hours values. I went ahead and fixed it to the best of my ability, but I d... commented 2026-08-29 06:29:36 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188180710 (Comments: 1) | PostaMap_Infinite (Discussed changesets: 26) | Well, at a second look it's not too regularly, but they have updated it before so they absolutely could update it in the future! commented 2026-08-29 06:13:49 UTC by PostaMap_Infinite ♦62 |
| 188179540 (Comments: 1) | Clairness (Discussed changesets: 6) | Just re-read the wiki on amenity=parking... I will fix the incorrectly mapped areas later. commented 2026-08-29 05:30:06 UTC by Clairness ♦5 |
| 188178889 (Comments: 1) | 010ender56 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Insignificant but iD Beta editor did not correctly populate the imagery_used field, I used both Esri World Imagery and Bing Maps Aerial. commented 2026-08-29 04:45:33 UTC by 010ender56 ♦1 |
| 188169471 (Comments: 1) | COST CUTTERS at Webster (Discussed changesets: 2) | Updated the now-outdated/incorrect brand:wikidata=* in changeset: https://osm.org/changeset/188178868 commented 2026-08-29 04:43:08 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188062885 (Comments: 1) | mcnv (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hello mcnv, When you have a relation like you do on this course with a fairway surrounding a green, you need to tag the *relation* as golf=fairway as you've done, but you don't want to tag the outer polygon as fairway as well. |
| 187396916 (Comments: 3) | ianmlq (Discussed changesets: 1) | Of course, you're most welcome! Thanks for understanding! commented 2026-08-29 03:27:55 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188018978 (Comments: 3) | TetrisEffect (Discussed changesets: 8) | Sure thing! I used to have that impression myself, but in fact contact:mobile=* (and the somewhat ambiguous mobile=*) is used to indicate that an _additional_ number leading to a mobile phone, and does not necessarily imply anything about texting cap... commented 2026-08-29 03:27:10 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 188080305 (Comments: 2) | CAM-Gerlach_Repair (Discussed changesets: 38) | It's suggested for toll-free numbers here: https://osm.wiki/Key:phone#Free_to_Call_Numbers_(Toll_Free_Numbers) And described in more detail here: https://osm.wiki/Key:phone#Support_for_multiple_countries Specifically:... commented 2026-08-29 03:09:18 UTC by CAM-Gerlach_Repair ♦2,008 |
| 168713934 (Comments: 1) | MrYouse (Discussed changesets: 1) | As of 6/28/26 or before this camera is gone. commented 2026-08-29 03:03:58 UTC by Gabe006 ♦1 |
| 187908950 (Comments: 1) | rmiessler (Discussed changesets: 1) | Good edit. Welcome to OSM and helping us track the flock changes! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/187908950 commented 2026-08-29 03:01:14 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,100 |
| 188145828 (Comments: 1) | keweenawking (Discussed changesets: 1) | Looks good. I agree, that road needed to be moved back. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/188145828 commented 2026-08-29 02:59:43 UTC by CurlingMan13 ♦2,100 |
| 188125000 (Comments: 2) | Flap Slimy Outward (Discussed changesets: 286) | I'll go change it back. Just an FYI: Some other user began downgrading multiple motorway "dangling spurs" in the Western US. They also did this to Lake Mead Parkway and Boulder City Parkway in Henderson and Boulder City, respectively. commented 2026-08-28 23:54:03 UTC by Flap Slimy Outward ♦352 |
| 188173765 (Comments: 1) | h234a2hm (Discussed changesets: 6) | source_ref=https://www.dekalbschoolsga.org/schools/all-schools commented 2026-08-28 23:33:04 UTC by h234a2hm ♦6 |