| Country | Changeset | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
 | 171898656 (Comments: 2) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Sorry, my mistake. commented 2025-09-15 02:37:21 UTC by nvh12 ♦1 |
| 171940435 (Comments: 1) | alicew02 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Alice, the vast majority of footprints here represent buildings, though most of the circular footprints actually represent vegetation i.e. bushes and trees, due to their colour. Zooming in and out tends to aid imagery interpretation. The NW... commented 2025-09-15 00:35:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171938673 (Comments: 1) | RedLily (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, it looks like you mapped this footprint based on only one half of a pitched roof and did not appropriately square the footprint. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical_errors_in_the_interpretation_of_roof_geometry_... commented 2025-09-15 00:15:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171907379 (Comments: 1) | Arktorus (Discussed changesets: 14) | This is generally a high quality contribution. There are some minor inaccuracies here and there, but on the whole it looks like you took care to accurately map the buildings here. You updated the river to match the imagery. Please consider th... commented 2025-09-14 23:49:29 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171933904 (Comments: 1) | Oscar Felipe Hoyos Carvajal (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you generally identified buildings visible in imagery and correctly tagged and squared the vast majority of them, however some are not as accurate as the imagery allows e.g. the footprints in the North, and a significant ammount share common node... commented 2025-09-14 23:03:51 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171936770 (Comments: 1) | tekvet (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! The vast majority of footprints you mapped here represent buildings; I think that two do not. They could be more accurate, and all buildings I saw in the imagery likely had square footprints. Consider that you are looking at the roofs... commented 2025-09-14 21:25:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171935451 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | All footprints you mapped here represent buildings. You improved the accuracy of an existing footprint; well done. When appropriate, please remember to square footprints after moving their nodes. Thank you for your contribution. Resolved by; C... commented 2025-09-14 20:48:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171934087 (Comments: 1) | kenVaiphei (Discussed changesets: 3) | Good job modifying the exisitng footprints here rather than deleting and remapping. You may want to map footprints slightly smaller than the roof you see to give yourself a buffer for the change in shape that occurs during squaring. Thank you for you... commented 2025-09-14 20:25:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171933687 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, you appropriately moved the highway to prevent data overlaps and make the relative position of features more accurate. The vast majority of footprints here represent individual footprints, but two in the South with complex shapes envelope... commented 2025-09-14 20:13:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171932949 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, this is overall a good cahngeset, but the arrow head shaped building in the NW is likely just a rectangular building and just looks that way becasue the imagery was taken at an angle. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling#Typical... commented 2025-09-14 19:52:16 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171931479 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, you are generally identifying buildings. A few of the buildings you mapped are almost as accurate as the imagery allows. Consider that you are looking at the roofs of buildings which likely overhang the walls somewhat. You created invalid shared ... commented 2025-09-14 19:40:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171930102 (Comments: 1) | Josh OB443 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Resolved by https://osmcha.org/changesets/171933411 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171930102 commented 2025-09-14 19:20:36 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171930543 (Comments: 3) | Josh OB443 (Discussed changesets: 3) | See how I mapped these buildings in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171933411 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from o... commented 2025-09-14 19:19:50 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171929843 (Comments: 1) | Josh OB443 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, in a couple of places you created shared nodes between buildings that share nodes: hold alt to prevent the creation of shared nodes. Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or resident... commented 2025-09-14 19:05:39 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171751299 (Comments: 4) | Wilfried Jansky (Discussed changesets: 2) | Thank you for the eye-opening links. From now on I will write expressive descriptions. commented 2025-09-14 17:39:09 UTC by Wilfried Jansky ♦2 |
| 171900886 (Comments: 1) | KaiPankrath (Discussed changesets: 12) | Hi, the buildings you added here are generally valid but oversized. This led to issues where some footprints overlapped other unmapped buildings visible in the imagery. Unless you're sure that a building shares a wall with another it's best... commented 2025-09-14 06:25:17 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171901456 (Comments: 2) | Gregory Peony (Discussed changesets: 7) | Accidental comment on my own changeset. OSMCha failed to load the target changeset. commented 2025-09-14 06:24:23 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171898730 (Comments: 2) | manjita pandey (Discussed changesets: 5) | See how I mapped the footpritns here in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171900733 commented 2025-09-14 05:21:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171900402 (Comments: 1) | katya75 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you identified buildings in imagery but most footpritns you map are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in ... commented 2025-09-14 05:20:30 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171899921 (Comments: 1) | katya75 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, There's reason to believe that all footprints you've mapped here represent buildings, however they are generally oversized; please map the footprints slightly smaller than the pitched roofs you see in imagery. Thank you for your contrib... commented 2025-09-14 04:48:27 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171898499 (Comments: 1) | Vibhi356 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, when mapping square features please right click and select square, or press q after tagging to square the corners of features. I resolved this in Changeset: 171898709 Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you... commented 2025-09-14 02:41:26 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171893514 (Comments: 1) | SaDa1979 (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hello, you have generally identified buildings in the imagery and mapped them quite accurately. They'd be even more accurate if you map the footprint slightly smaller than the roof you see. You created some invalid shared nodes between buildings... commented 2025-09-14 02:27:33 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171897448 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! The footprint you added here represents a building in the imagery, well spotted! I think this building is actually square becasue the shadow it casts is straight. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898153 I... commented 2025-09-14 01:49:00 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171897457 (Comments: 1) | nvh12 (Discussed changesets: 3) | Welcome to OSM! The footprint you added here represents a building in the imagery, well spotted! It is however oversized and should be squared. See how I mapped it in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171898110 When mapping buildings, please trace... commented 2025-09-14 01:43:31 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171897086 (Comments: 1) | Vibhi356 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Welcome to OSM! All footprints you added here represent buildings in the imagery but they should be squared and sometimes you only used one half of the roof to map them. Condider the roof shape and how the scene is lit. See how I mapped the northern ... commented 2025-09-14 01:38:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171753166 (Comments: 1) | lilith hotaro (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, all footprints you mapped here represent buildings in the imagery. They could be more accurate if you genearally mapped them smaller because pitched roofs tend to overhang building walls. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape acc... commented 2025-09-13 18:09:04 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171751064 (Comments: 1) | AnyaBond (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, every footprints you added here represents a building in the imagery but they could be more accurate and should have been squared. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population esti... commented 2025-09-13 18:00:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171751393 (Comments: 1) | AnyaBond (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi, the NE footprint envelopes multiple buildings. Please do not connect the corners of buildings to other buildings or features such as highways or residential areas. In the iD Editor, hold down the `Alt` key to prevent your cursor from snap... commented 2025-09-13 17:57:52 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171751603 (Comments: 1) | AnyaBond (Discussed changesets: 3) | Hi Anya, Assuming you were asking if the western most footprint here represents a building my answer is that, yes, it does, and I think that all the footprints you added here represent buildings. It is obscured by vegetation, but there is evid... commented 2025-09-13 17:53:41 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171853986 (Comments: 1) | Oscar Felipe Hoyos Carvajal (Discussed changesets: 2) | None of your mappings was squared: After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners. All your mappings were oversized. The humanitarian teams use the size of ... commented 2025-09-13 15:56:55 UTC by Kraan46 ♦24 |
| 171801177 (Comments: 1) | NRmapper (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi NRmapper, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions to the map. I have reviewed your recent edits and noticed that 87% of the changes in this set involve deletions, including: - 88 building(s) Could you please confirm if th... commented 2025-09-11 19:58:35 UTC by NeisBot ♦2,630 |
| 171752409 (Comments: 1) | lamplanne (Discussed changesets: 2) | All footprints you mapped here represent buildings in imagery. The Western group of buildings is generally more accurate than the Eastern group which is oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building f... commented 2025-09-10 19:31:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171750716 (Comments: 1) | JonaClaudio (Discussed changesets: 1) | The footpritns you added here all appear valid but some are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps. Zoom in so that you... commented 2025-09-10 18:56:23 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171750720 (Comments: 1) | PiumaLuna (Discussed changesets: 1) | Welcome to OSM! some of the footprints you added are very accurate and I could not have done a better job myself, others however are oversized and are not squared when they should be. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately.... commented 2025-09-10 18:53:46 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171750725 (Comments: 1) | Innocent_Toepper (Discussed changesets: 1) | The vast majority of building footprints you mapped here are really accurate. Remember to exclude the shadow a building casts from its footprint shape and map the footprint slightly smaller than the roof you see in imagery. Good job on improving the... commented 2025-09-10 18:49:20 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748617 (Comments: 1) | flaviaBle (Discussed changesets: 2) | The vast majority of footprints you mapped here are valid however one may be enveloping two buildings and another may infact represent a barrier like a fence or wall (I flagged these). Otherwise remember to square footpritns when appropriate. |
| 171748602 (Comments: 1) | geopaules (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi all of the footpritns you mapped represent buildings though some are slightly oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps.... commented 2025-09-10 18:35:38 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748587 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | This looks like an improvement from your previous contributions. Some of these building footprints are very accurate and I could not have mapped them better myself. Others are slightly oversized or have needlessly complex shapes. Try mapping ... commented 2025-09-10 18:33:32 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748571 (Comments: 1) | RCD49 (Discussed changesets: 10) | Good job spotting these footprints! Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/ ... commented 2025-09-10 18:26:19 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748547 (Comments: 1) | lamplanne (Discussed changesets: 2) | The footprintd you added here are all valid and quite accurate. The shapes are correct but they tend to be oversized. Try mapping the footpritns slightly smaller than the roof you see in the imagery. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to ex... commented 2025-09-10 18:24:43 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748546 (Comments: 1) | Noortjevdam (Discussed changesets: 2) | See how I mapped some of the footprints here in https://osmcha.org/changesets/171750127 Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon.... commented 2025-09-10 18:22:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748513 (Comments: 1) | sg17843 (Discussed changesets: 7) | The footprints you mapped here are generally valid and accurate, consider mapping them slightly smaller than the roof. See how I mapped a couple of the buildings here in Changeset: 171749837 --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA |
| 171748496 (Comments: 1) | Farbfernseher91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | The footprints here are generally valid but a good proportion are oversized and include the building's shadow in the footprint's size. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid popula... commented 2025-09-10 18:08:21 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748424 (Comments: 1) | ryansnooker (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you identified buildings here but the footprints you mapped are not as accurarte as they could be and the footprints should have been squared. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid pop... commented 2025-09-10 18:05:28 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748419 (Comments: 2) | chrisble (Discussed changesets: 1) | If I understand you correctly then please add these hashtags to your changeset comment when you save/upload to keep track of the mapathon stats. It is not reasonable to apply them to the project as a whole becasue there is much activity not associate... commented 2025-09-10 18:03:49 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748155 (Comments: 1) | RCD49 (Discussed changesets: 10) | These look like valid and accurate footprints to be. good job identifying the Southern one since it looks like a tree is obscuring its shadow. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from... commented 2025-09-10 17:59:22 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748247 (Comments: 1) | remimage (Discussed changesets: 13) | Valid footprints, though ever so slightly oversized. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://o... commented 2025-09-10 17:56:20 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748254 (Comments: 1) | Noortjevdam (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Noort, you identified and mapped the buildings here quite well, though they could be slightly smaller and you enveloped two buildings with the footprint I flagged. Pay attention to shadows to better tell where one building ends and another begins.... commented 2025-09-10 17:55:05 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748267 (Comments: 1) | Danica42 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Danica, you identified buildings in imagery, but the footprints could be more accurate. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estimates and prevent issues like data overlaps.... commented 2025-09-10 17:51:59 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748286 (Comments: 1) | flaviaBle (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Flavia, you identified buildings in the imagery and mapped most of them quite well but there are a couple with rather unique shapes that should be square. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpri... commented 2025-09-10 17:49:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748130 (Comments: 1) | Farbfernseher91 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi Farb, you identified buildings in the imagery and shaped them correctly but the imagery allows for some of them to be more accurate; generally they are oversized. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building ... commented 2025-09-10 17:46:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171748151 (Comments: 1) | lena_re (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi Lena, you added a valid and accurate footprint here. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https:... commented 2025-09-10 17:43:44 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171747128 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | Hi, you identified and mapped some buildings accurately here, however others inappropriately share nodes with others, have not been appropriately shaped or envelope multiple buildings visible in imagery. I flagged some footprints here I think could b... commented 2025-09-10 17:33:42 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171745050 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | This footprit is in fact square. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a m... commented 2025-09-10 17:17:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171742553 (Comments: 1) | august32 (Discussed changesets: 2) | Hi, you correctly identified, tagged and squared building footprints. Most are quite accurate but the imagery allows for some to be more so. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population... commented 2025-09-10 17:17:08 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171744993 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | You generally identified buildings in the imagery here but they imagery allows their footpritns to be mapped more accurately. Zoom in and out to aid your interpretation and consider the roof shape of the buildings you're mapping. When map... commented 2025-09-10 17:06:55 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171743028 (Comments: 1) | Ruixin Jiang (Discussed changesets: 5) | You added valid and accurate footpritns here. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.o... commented 2025-09-10 16:51:48 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171744557 (Comments: 1) | Måns Dahl (Discussed changesets: 4) | Hi, you identified buildings here, but the imagery allows them to be more accurate. Zoom in and out to better interpret the imagery. When mapping buildings, please trace the shape accurately. Accurate building footpritns aid population estima... commented 2025-09-10 16:45:11 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171743658 (Comments: 1) | EnriqueG07 (Discussed changesets: 1) | Hi, you generally correctly identified buildings in the imagery and tagged them correctly, but they could be more accuate. I have some feedback for you so that you can improve your future contributions. The circular building you added actuall... commented 2025-09-10 16:18:40 UTC by Gregory Peony ♦936 |
| 171738491 (Comments: 2) | Kraan46 (Discussed changesets: 18) | Sorry, only reading this comment already feels like a waste of time and delays progress. I know how to map a building with the available imagery quality. This is not motivating at all. commented 2025-09-10 16:14:51 UTC by Kraan46 ♦24 |