Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | ResultMaps | Latest OSM discussions | Autoreload 5:00 min | Page limited to max. 500 changesets
sfrank participated in the following changeset discussions
Discussed changesets of this contributor | More details | Discussions Include blocked users | Discussions without answer | Discussions without own answer | RSS feed
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
163065008
by sfrank
@ 2025-02-28 18:33		12025-04-08 06:19user_5359
♦19,376		 Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/12513977731 (one of sixty-eight objects). Did you mean source:population:tribe instead of source:populattion:tribe?
22025-04-10 17:05sfrank Hello,
Many Thanks.
Correct, I will fix it.

32025-04-10 17:39sfrank I hope, I had fixed all.
156950006
by mueschel
@ 2024-09-22 12:45		12024-09-23 21:08sfrank Thank you for fixing the tags !
156793125
by sfrank
@ 2024-09-18 20:42		12024-09-22 05:49user_5359
♦19,376		 Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12184851604 (one of sixty six objects). Did you mean name:en instead nem:en?
22024-09-23 21:07sfrank Hello,

Thank you. Correct, should be name:en.
was already fixed by user mueschel.
111165321
by sfrank
@ 2021-09-13 20:58		12024-08-17 03:10marc__marc
♦1,265		 Hello,
suggestion :
instead of imagery_used=Maxarpremium, retreived 09/2021
use imagery_used=Maxar premium
imagery_used:date2021-09
this would make it easier to find objects made with oldimagery
Regards,
Marc
22024-08-17 17:46sfrank Thank you,
I will use it from now on.
150681895
by sfrank
@ 2024-04-29 21:14		12024-05-02 15:45NLBRT
♦15		 Hi there! I'd like to thank you for taking your time and adding these hamlets. However, I see that there's loads of macrons in a lot of these names. Do you mind replacing these with standard Latin letters?
22024-05-03 08:49sfrank Hi, many thanks!
Feel free to change, if you know the correct spelling. The documents I use are using this "macrons" at the "real" name (i.e. exported data from geonames.nga.mil - old variant and patially old india survey maps). I do not know, what is the correct spelling only i...
32024-05-06 15:12sfrank Hi,
I checked some other sources outside OSM. Even "Survey of India" (www.surveyofindia.gov.in) uses this type of letters with macron at its "englisch" maps.
145635130
by sfrank
@ 2023-12-28 20:00		12024-01-18 16:57Vinber-Pro
♦1,247		 hi sfranck
do you know why there is 2 objects for dam ?
this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100497100
and this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205729455

it's a practice or an error ?

regards
22024-01-19 19:18sfrank hi,
I asked myself the same thing when I changed there.
there were 2 objects/ways ID:205729455 and ID:100497100 for Farakka Barrage. I didn't change it because I wasn't sure why, too.
dam ID 100497100 was created by PlaneMad changeset #7334148 13 years ago, dam with ID 205729455 was cre...
32024-01-25 16:46Vinber-Pro
♦1,247		 hi,
i think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205729455 is better as area.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100497100 is "only a way", i erased this duplicate
regards
42024-01-25 16:49Vinber-Pro
♦1,247		 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146681038
122667212
by Shel_Sri
@ 2022-06-21 12:41		12023-01-01 20:13sfrank Hello,
It seems you removed the highway part from the MDR225 route relation (relation no. 14136594). I have fixed it, but be careful at your next editings or comment it, if you did it intentionally.
22023-01-03 02:26Shel_Sri
♦4		 Hi sfrank,

I only aligned this secondary highway (way/174064476) without editing any route relation. I checked my changeset and the history of this relation (14136594), but I can't find my edits on the route relation. It would be much appreciated if you could help me identifying it.

Than...
32023-01-03 21:38sfrank Hello Shel_Sri,
Sorry. I checked the changeset too and also couldn't find the missing route. Maybe I was too quick with my comment to you.
Maybe I accidentally removed the route myself.
Thanks sfrank.
42023-01-04 11:41Shel_Sri
♦4		 Thank you sfrank!

123404794
by sfrank
@ 2022-07-09 15:44		12022-07-11 11:28user_5359
♦19,376		 Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1077149992 (one of thirty four objects). What ist the meaning of the tag crnae:mobile = work_site? Did you mean crane:mobile = work_site?
22022-07-12 18:17sfrank Hello!
Thanks for the comment.
Was wrong tag spelling.
Must be crane:mobile = work_site, I fixed it.
83077404
by sfrank
@ 2020-04-04 17:13		12022-06-06 13:57Basstoelpel
♦368		 Hallo sfrank,

bitte kein man_made=tower an Strommasten.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
22022-06-06 15:04sfrank Hallo Baßtölpel,
soweit ich das sehe (Maxar, Bing imagery) sind die beiden Freileitungen korrekt getaggt. Daneben sind 2 Objekte, die ich nicht genau deuten kann. Eines davon wurde mit man_made=tower von robram2004 (Änderungssatz 71151336) schon vor mir getaggt (stammt also nicht vo...
118070441
by sfrank
@ 2022-03-03 20:48		12022-03-08 07:45user_5359
♦19,376		 Hallo! Schau Dir mal den Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036973096 an. Was meinst Du mit landusees = 2 ?
22022-03-08 18:01sfrank Hallo,
Danke für den Hinweis. Habe es entfernt. Ist wohl bei der JOSM Autovervollständigen Funktion irgendwie rein gerutscht.
Frank
115925263
by sfrank
@ 2022-01-08 21:58		12022-01-10 16:32user_5359
♦19,376		 Hello! Please have look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22dete%3Aelectrified%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22dete%3Aelectrified%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22dete%3Aelectrified%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=23.38882;85.01536;11 Did you mean date:electrified instead dete:electrified?
22022-01-15 10:13sfrank Hello! Thank you for the comment.
I have fixed the tags with the wrong spelling.
115467037
by sfrank
@ 2021-12-28 11:54		12021-12-29 08:28user_5359
♦19,376		 Hallo! Bitte sieht Dir mal den Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134530465 an. Was ist die Beduetung des Schlüssel Alt?
22021-12-29 09:48sfrank Hallo, Danke für den Hinweis.
Hatte mich vertippt, war der Name vom GNS. Jetzt fefixt.
111515644
by sfrank
@ 2021-09-21 21:41		12021-10-02 08:19mueschel
♦6,568		 Hi,
is "date:end_NG" the date the railway ended to be narrow gauge? Neither "date:end" nor suffizes like "_NG" are common.
Following common tagging schemes, the most reasonable tag would be
"narrow_gauge:end_date". Would you mind changing that?
22021-10-02 08:52sfrank Hi,
Thank you for your comment. I uploaded the change right now. Sometimes it is not easy to find a good tag name.
geetings from germany
90774316
by sfrank
@ 2020-09-11 18:59		12020-09-12 08:59mueschel
♦6,568		 Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of keys, it's 'name:oc', not 'name_oc'. I just fixed 50 of those.
22020-09-12 11:45sfrank Hi,
Thank you for fixing. I didnt erecognize it until now that I used wrong tag. Sure, right tag is name:oc
51385345
by Trockennasenaffe
@ 2017-08-23 19:04		12019-08-11 16:41sfrank Hallo,

ich war grade im Urlaub da und OsmAnd+ hat weder die Bahnübergänge angesagt /angezeigt noch wurden die Gleise angezeigt. ich würde vorschlagen statt railway:preserved lieber railway:rail und railway:preserved=yes verwenden wollen. (siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w...
22019-08-12 15:54Trockennasenaffe
♦16		 Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe das so nicht angelegt, das war adjuva, aber ich kann mir das bei Zeiten gerne mal anschauen.
32019-08-12 19:34sfrank OK, danke. Ich wollte das "nichteinfachso" ändern, da ich nicht genau weiss, warum das so getaggt wurde.
42019-08-13 11:50Trockennasenaffe
♦16		 Ich denke dein Einwand ist berechtigt. Ich werde das mal ändern.
67328120
by rodrigodlt
@ 2019-02-18 19:57		12019-02-19 18:36sfrank Hello
This is not an road!
is is an multipolygon relation.
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boundary.
I will revert this change.
66040028
by BUtesch
@ 2019-01-05 05:21		12019-01-29 20:58sfrank you are sure node 6185295931 is a marked road crossing??
66590763
by Naganjaneyulu Chaganti
@ 2019-01-24 06:00		12019-01-29 20:34sfrank This is not a higway! this is a boundary (border) of a village as multiüpolygon ralation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary; india: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India/Boundaries and https://wiki...
66374552
by MapCoates
@ 2019-01-16 20:07		12019-01-29 20:34sfrank This is not a higway! this is a boundary (border) of a village as multiüpolygon ralation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary; india: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India/Boundaries and https://wiki...
66080387
by sfrank
@ 2019-01-06 21:00		12019-01-08 21:38Abruzzzo
Active block		 Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option.
22019-01-09 18:38sfrank It is a little bit tricky, because there are not many free sources for this. As far as I do "armchair mapping" it is impossible for me to check this on ground. And most villages around I have mapped by myself. I use a long list with names from Census and from govermental sources. But the...
53884445
by sfrank
@ 2017-11-17 20:03		12017-11-18 11:23mueschel
♦6,568		 Hi,
here you added the tag "mdds:code", a week ago it was "MDDS_Code". Could you change to a common spelling of the key?
Btw, if this is kind of a reference number used by government, I'd consider "ref:mdds" as better.

Cheers, Jan
22017-11-18 21:17sfrank Hi,
first I did not find any tag for the MDDS-code (sort of e goverment code, found in census2011 documents and others), and also only less information for village tagging in india. But then I found a (older) discussion entry https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2012-May/001630.html (...
46987245
by sfrank
@ 2017-03-19 16:36		12017-03-20 08:49ulmtuelp
♦56		 Hier hat es versehentlich ein große Menge Verschiebungen einzelner Punkte und damit von Flächen und Straßen im Bereich des Stausees Unterbecken gegeben. Bitte mal schauen.
22017-03-20 20:15sfrank Sollte jetzt gefixt sein.
JOSM hat nicht aufgehört, Daten zu laden, dabei ist wohl was schief gegangen.
46193990
by sfrank
@ 2017-02-18 14:37		12017-02-23 11:35mueschel
♦6,568		 Hi,
you used the keys railway:date_start and :date_end. The usual key for this is railway:start_date and :end_date.
Could you have a look and correct this?
Cheers, Jan
22017-02-26 16:20sfrank Hi,
I fixed it. Was accidently used, because first I used date:start and date:end.
Frank