| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54291335 by RossA | 1 | 2017-12-04 18:11:37 UTC | trigpoint | Hi, this edit seems very odd and a little wrong.The Cock is primarily a pub, a very good one with 10 handpulls. That is why it was mapped as amenity=pub. It a bit of a stretch to call it a hotel, it has a few rooms hence the accomodation=yes tag, which you seem to have removed. Why do you consid... |
| 2 | 2018-06-28 23:09:46 UTC | trigpoint | No response as to the reason so have reverted based on my local knowledge | |
| 60108326 by RossA | 1 | 2018-06-28 15:43:20 UTC | trigpoint | If these ways are private, how do customers access the campsite? |
| 58076708 by RossA | 1 | 2018-04-17 15:01:21 UTC | Mike Baggaley | Hi, in the change a number of ways (31140891, 299417582, 41121952, 43462076, 5096325) have been set with foot=permissive;yes. Can you please review and set one value or the other as appropriate?Thanks,Mike |
| 2 | 2018-04-17 15:53:24 UTC | RossA | Well spotted Mike - what do you use to spot this sort of thing? I’ve corrected I think but will double check when home later. | |
| 3 | 2018-04-17 16:09:11 UTC | Mike Baggaley | I use mkgmap to build a Garmin map from OSM data, and my build process includes checks for various things, one of which is unrecognised access values. | |