gsa participated in the following changeset discussionsgsa participated in the following changeset discussions| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82477222 by Gemeinde Völs @ 2020-03-22 08:55 | 1 | 2020-07-22 20:57 | gsa | Die Positionen der Trinkwasserstellen "Mumelter-Brunnen" und "Binderstube" waren viel zu ungenau eingetragen. Die anderen Stellen kenne ich nicht, eventuell muss man die genaue Lage ebenfalls überprüfen. |
| 70582806 by Tariq Kamal Ajoonzai @ 2019-05-24 11:23 | 1 | 2019-12-29 11:49 | gsa | Hi, you added several peaks in this changeset (Chumbar ...). For example, you set "ele=15470" in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6497515037 This cannot be true: the ele tag measures the elevation of a peak in meters. Even if you used feet as a unit, I cannot verify this. 15470 ft is equ... |
| 67600148 by ManelG @ 2019-02-26 23:19 | 1 | 2019-03-31 13:53 | gsa | What is your source for the heigth of Mount Joffre? You changed it from 3450 m to 3433 m. |
| 2 | 2019-03-31 16:00 | ManelG ♦6 | Canadian Digital Elevation Model shows 3427 and bivouac.com (refered by the Wikipedia article) shows 3433. Other sources (peakbagger, peakvisor) also indicate 3433m. | |
| 3 | 2019-03-31 17:56 | gsa | Thanks | |
| 68256914 by andershl @ 2019-03-18 12:35 | 1 | 2019-03-27 09:58 | andershl ♦88 | This is one of 9 change sets introducing base geographical names for North Eastern Greenland. For more information see http://www.xoz.dk/public/nordost/ |
| 2 | 2019-03-31 13:59 | gsa | Now we have two "Petermann Bjerg" on the map: Yours (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6344916343) and an older one (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2059718202). Please check what you are doing. | |
| 3 | 2019-03-31 15:21 | andershl ♦88 | I have imported the official coordinates for peaks. Do not know where the other came from..... | |
| 4 | 2019-03-31 15:22 | andershl ♦88 | And the officially registered elevations. | |
| 5 | 2019-03-31 17:53 | gsa | I haven't looked at your changes, I just noticed this particular mountain. If you import something, you have to check before that you don't create duplicate data. Is this an import according to the import guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines, or are you doing so... | |
| 6 | 2019-04-01 06:23 | andershl ♦88 | The database received contained 4635 official points with coordinates. It is no surprise if there are a few typos. There will inevitably be a few such that cannot be verified/corrected against other sources and must therefore be deleted. Any assistance in such is highly appreciated. | |
| 7 | 2019-04-05 17:11 | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦70,576 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68929617 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import in Greenland following reported problems and request from original importer - message said 'And if someone want to delete the whole thing for a better start: Di i... | |
| 8 | 2019-04-08 17:50 | MarkusHD ♦176 | Now we do not have a "Petermann Bjerg" anymore. If you know your changes have been reverted, then please revert your own reversions: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68747344 | |
| 9 | 2019-04-08 18:16 | andershl ♦88 | Yep. It will reappear together with 1200 others. I am in contact with other participators, so everything will be done correctly... | |
| 10 | 2019-06-26 06:05 | MarkusHD ♦176 | Three months later it still isn't fixed. Guessed so... | |
| 11 | 2019-06-26 14:51 | andershl ♦88 | Markus: This is summer. Come winter and I shall meticulously revise and suggest some better imports. Only some 10-15 peaks were previously defined in the southernmost part of the vast area and all shall be up for review then. | |
| 67634668 by Fluffýs @ 2019-02-27 23:36 | 1 | 2019-03-31 13:46 | gsa | Wenn bei Project-GC etwas falsch angezeigt wird, dann ist das ein Fehler von Project-GC und muss auch dort behoben werden. Ich glaube, dass die alte Angabe von 3510 m richtig war. Bitte rückgängig machen. |
| 64871264 by Rob Dyson @ 2018-11-25 16:40 | 1 | 2019-01-19 18:03 | gsa | If you add the "ele" tag to a peak, please make sure that the elevation is in metres, not in feet. |
| 54399769 by StileQ12 @ 2017-12-06 12:39 | 1 | 2018-04-21 17:37 | gsa | Heißt der Pimmelmann Platz wirklich so? Jedenfalls ist ein Tippfehler zu beheben: PLatz -> Platz |
| 2 | 2018-11-17 11:21 | Nakaner-repair ♦8,261 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64593104 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (all changesets by user StileQ12) | |
| 24425534 by dodgesedan @ 2014-07-29 16:31 | 1 | 2017-09-30 15:53 | gsa | Gibt es das Flugzeug wirklich? |
| 2 | 2017-09-30 16:50 | wilmaed ♦83 | zumindest auf einer Luftaufnahme ist es zu sehen :) | |
| 3 | 2017-09-30 16:52 | wilmaed ♦83 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Daircraft:) | |
| 4 | 2017-09-30 17:11 | gsa | Hm, ja, da habe ich die falschen Luftbilder angeschaut. Aber auf neueren Bildern ist nichts zu sehen, ich glaube nicht, dass das Flugzeug dort auf dem Feld herum liegt. | |
| 52073160 by Siegi-A @ 2017-09-15 15:59 | 1 | 2017-09-16 11:42 | gsa | Ist es Absicht, dass die Häuser Hausnummern (addr:houenumber) aber keine Straßen (addr:street) zugeordnet bekommen? |
| 47632527 by Amas200996 @ 2017-04-10 17:57 | 1 | 2017-04-11 00:22 | Kevin Kofler ♦74 | Hi,you have made a few edits to OpenStreetMap using the MAPS.ME editor. Be warned that MAPS.ME uploads everything you save to the public OpenStreetMap database. Therefore, it is important that what you input is correct, because it will affect many other users.Unfortunately, you have set the ... |
| 2 | 2017-04-24 09:21 | gsa | I also have doubts about node #4786758025. A hostel in the same building as Hotel Sacher? | |
| 3 | 2017-04-24 11:07 | Kevin Kofler ♦74 | Yes, I double-checked the 2 added nodes, they are also wrong. I removed them (and another bogus node added by another user):https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48087232https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48087326 | |
| 44655803 by Morgi_ @ 2016-12-25 04:33 | 1 | 2017-04-18 14:26 | gsa | Warum wurde der Optiker Pearle gelöscht? Beim Vorbeifahren letzte Woche sah es so aus, als wäre er noch da. |
| 45011968 by yule liu @ 2017-01-08 21:06 | 1 | 2017-01-14 16:25 | gsa | According to google translate you added "Lily German" to this note. I don't think this is information which belongs to OpenStreetMap. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45164053. |
| 44980915 by yule liu @ 2017-01-07 15:06 | 1 | 2017-01-07 16:54 | gsa | According to Google translate you added "Sister home", "Four uncle", "Aunt home" in Chinese. I don't think this belongs into OpenStreetMap. |
| 2 | 2017-01-07 23:51 | Kevin Kofler ♦74 | I fixed the name tags. They are clearly wrong, Chinese characters also do not belong in the name:de tag. What you as a Chinese speaker can do is to verify the Chinese characters in the name:zh tag for the restaurant Lotos (= Lotus, but they spell it Lotos) in Feldkirch. I'm pretty sure about th... | |
| 3 | 2017-01-08 09:42 | gsa | @Kevin Kofler Thank you for your very diligent effort. | |
| 42953220 by bvivi @ 2016-10-17 07:51 Active block | 1 | 2016-12-26 10:11 | gsa | Do you mean "maxspeed=20" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448099277 ? |
| 33163934 by Polyglot @ 2015-08-06 19:27 | 1 | 2016-12-03 18:22 | gsa | Does this really make sense? Wikidata claims, that Chaussée Brunehaut (Q2961670) is a road in Germany. Moreover, the corresponding Wikipedia articles are not about one particular road, but about roads of that name in general. |
| 38767879 by Trockennasenaffe @ 2016-04-21 20:19 | 1 | 2016-12-03 18:11 | gsa | The wikidata IDs on "Wellenflug", "Maus au Chocolat" and "Der lustige Papagei" are wrong. |
| 34170873 by gsa @ 2015-09-21 20:23 | 1 | 2015-09-23 08:10 | glglgl ♦274 | Would have been fine to split this up by regions, instead of getting a changeset spanning half the world... |
| 2 | 2015-09-23 18:32 | gsa | Sorry. I was not aware that changesets with huge bounding boxes can cause problems. Will not happen again. | |
| 33087592 by sudeepkuikel @ 2015-08-04 05:23 | 1 | 2015-09-13 09:04 | gsa | This looks very strange. |