3 changesets created by Mike Geo have been discussed with 3 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
64653597
by Mike Geo
@ 2018-11-19 12:15
12018-11-21 12:51trigpoint
♦2,373
Hi Mike
Please do not abuse the name tag, that is for actual name. It is not a place to dump miscellaneous information.
The correct way to tag a proposed feature is to use highway=proposed. Although the consensus is that until there is something verifiable on the ground and we can add it as constr...
22018-11-21 13:07trigpoint
♦2,373
The wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed does say that proposed features should only be added in exceptional circumstances after discussion with the community. In the case of new urban sprawl that is unlikely to be the case
32018-11-21 15:25Mike Geo Hi Trigpoint
Thanks for your comments. I must learn more about the finer points in this case but I see that I have misused a field here as you pointed out. My alogogies. This changeset was prompted by a field-walk where an existing bridle way is being partially closed (public notice posted) but ...
42018-11-21 15:54Mike Geo On reflection I also think it would be best to remove the whole section wrongly named proposed as you suggested. Unfortunately I am unable to do that in ID. I don't know why. A temporary lock, multi-edits?
52018-11-22 12:41trigpoint
♦2,373
Hi Mike
Once construction begins you can begin adding the line in from your own estimations. Once it is complete and you can walk it you can use the gps trace to improve the alignment.
We certainly must not use planning applications as a source, the maps will be based on OS maps and we must not co...
48311418
by Mike Geo
@ 2017-05-01 16:05
12017-05-02 03:04nevw
♦1,980
I added the tag man_made=pier to the Dockside Walk piers
22017-05-02 16:03Mike Geo thanks
46842212
by Mike Geo
@ 2017-03-14 14:18
12017-03-14 19:50trigpoint
♦2,373
Hi Mike, just checking that you have surveyed this path recently. The area is being developed so just checking.
Cheers Phil