| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101856130 by Morten Lange @ 2021-03-27 22:20 | 1 | 2021-03-28 17:25 | danieldegroot2 ♦675 | Hey Morten Lange,In my personal opinion, a status tag is not appropriate for areas such as volcanic lava fields.Lava flow is active in the same sense water and mudflows (i.e. landslides) are active; they can be actively flowing -which is mostly passive, as it is caused by gravity which is an... |
| 2 | 2021-03-28 20:37 | Ben97 | Completely agree to what danieldegroot2 wrote. I don't see the need for such a tag | |
| 3 | 2021-03-28 20:47 | Ben97 | I think it is completely sufficient to mark the volcanoes as active, as it is already done. | |
| 4 | 2021-03-29 09:39 | Morten Lange ♦57 | At the moment the lave field is as actively changing as the volcano. It is growing, it is hot, it occasionally "reverts" in large patches from solid state to liquid. So it certainly has a different status from the surrounding areas of barren rock lava-field which is thousands of years ol... | |
| 5 | 2021-03-29 11:41 | danieldegroot2 ♦675 | Ok. However, "One feature, one element" applies here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_elementA volcano or volcanic vent is in principle a geologically active lava flow and so is the lava field. Adding the same status tag -or a similar tag, which can be seen as ta... | |
| 101558168 by pallih @ 2021-03-23 08:49 | 1 | 2021-03-23 09:22 | Ben97 | Could you please make sure that you do not connect things that don't have anything to do with each other, for example the landcover and the path to Geldingadalir. This is 1. not correct and 2. makes it very annoying to edit these objects. |
| 2 | 2021-03-23 09:25 | Ben97 | And please provide a source | |
| 3 | 2021-03-23 09:26 | pallih ♦4 | Yes! Sorry. I'll fix right now. | |
| 101004827 by Anna Jonna Ármannsdóttir @ 2021-03-14 19:22 | 1 | 2021-03-22 13:12 | Ben97 | Please make sure that you do not accidentally destroy data! A lake with two ways both with role=inner does not make any sense! |
| 101376827 by Ben97 @ 2021-03-20 07:20 | 1 | 2021-03-20 08:02 | Morten Lange ♦57 | Thanks. I'm curious as to what was overhasty, though. |
| 2 | 2021-03-20 09:14 | Ben97 | There were broken multipolygons as the Geldingadalir multipolygon with invalid roles. | |
| 69202523 by Ben97 @ 2019-04-14 13:29 | 1 | 2019-04-14 20:47 | Tómas Ingi ♦79 | It looks like you accidentally moved the entire Hlíðar neighbourhood into the ocean: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2922969#map=14/62.5674/-25.2700 |
| 2 | 2019-04-15 16:09 | Ben97 | Thanks for the hint. I corrected it | |
| 50820707 by Ben97 @ 2017-08-03 21:10 | 1 | 2018-07-11 07:19 | Aleks-Berlin ♦482 | Hi Ben97, what do you mean with tag "J"="311" ? As it is unique, I assume it is a typo? regards, Alex |
| 2 | 2018-07-16 15:34 | Ben97 | It should be CLC:code=311I accidentially edited it. | |
| 48274033 by Ben97 @ 2017-04-30 07:05 | 1 | 2017-04-30 10:13 | emergency99 ♦288 | But this is Austria ;) |
| 2 | 2017-04-30 10:16 | Ben97 | I know, I realised too late that I was not longer in Germany... ;-) | |
| 46953270 by Ben97 @ 2017-03-18 11:18 | 1 | 2017-03-19 08:56 | Nakaner ♦3,149 | Hi Ben97,welcome to OpenStreetMap.I suspect that "(free)" is not par of the real name of this camp site. It is already indicated by using fee=no. Could you please remove it from the name? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_NameIn addition, I ... |
| 2 | 2017-03-19 09:19 | Ben97 | Ok Sorry, edited everything |