| Changeset |
No. |
Date |
Contributor |
Comment |
|
| 50116764 | karitotp | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Could you please share the source for these highways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505911060/history? They do not match with the satellite imagery. ThanksKarito |
| j03lar50n | Hi cjohn105 and karitotp. Yes, welcome to OSM, cjohn105. It looks like you have digitizing tracks that perhaps fire equipment made during the suppression of a wildfire, sometime around 2011 ... as per this source tms:http://gis.slocounty.ca.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Aerials/2011_Combined_WGSWMAS/MapS... |
|
| 49732985 | j03lar50n | wow, looking better in DT SLO! |
|
| 49439377 | j03lar50n | Thank you, TheDutchMan13. I'm curious how this inquiry came in to you? I don't see it as a Note. |
| TheDutchMan13 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ritarocks |
| TheDutchMan13 | This user sent me a private message on osm |
| TheDutchMan13 | My apologies for not getting back to you sooner. |
|
| 48775343 | j03lar50n | w00t 🙌 |
| hpanno | Back at it! |
|
| 48327144 | j03lar50n | >Most of this area just wants deleting tbhugh, yeah...because of all the poor landuse/landcover imports? |
| Richard | I was thinking more the really rough TIGER roads around the oilfield - most rural TIGER highway=residentials are an approximation at best, but this bunch is really bad and actively misleading. If all the oilfield roads were deleted, and a few access roads traced afresh, the map would be a lot better... |
|
| 47078716 | j03lar50n | I would suggest changing the road type and possibly only removing the name tag, instead of deleting the entire feature. Having driveways included in the road network can assist with routing. |
| srividya_c | @zhackney and @ j03lar50nI have reverted the changeset at #47087298 changeset. @zhackney do improve the existing highways and not delete them if it exists in imagery. |
|
| 46970755 | j03lar50n | Hello, are you certain this is a park? Does it have a name? |
|
| 46701835 | j03lar50n | Hello, your edit was reverted by another member of the local SLO OpenStreetMap community. The flooding may be a temporary situation, but it's not a permanent feature and not an appropriate addition. Please let us know if you have any questions - we're glad to help! |
|
| 46353406 | j03lar50n | thanks for cleaning up those vineyard tags! |
|
| 46328558 | j03lar50n | Awesome! You continue to make great additions to our local OSM - thank you!! |
|
| 45959501 | j03lar50n | Hello, can you explain this edit? It does not seem appropriate from my evaluation of the aerial imagery for this area. Please advise. |
|
| 45220427 | j03lar50n | Hello, what exactly are you up to with all the edits you're making on this campground? I am not seeing any benefits gained from your edits and believed the data was already in a good/usable state. I am local to this area and have worked with others to map this in-person. Please advise your intention... |
| Bman | Hi @j03lar50n, my apologies for the multiple edits with no visible changes.In short, I was originally trying to improve things, then realized I made a mistake and tried to get things back to the way they originally looked on OSM tiles.I initially noticed that they all had identical addr:*, and w... |
|
| 44356961 | j03lar50n | Nice! Thanks, bro |
|
| 41612271 | j03lar50n | Thank you so much for this fix! |
|
| 40071280 | j03lar50n | nice add! |
|
| 39829462 | j03lar50n | nice adds! |
| edgrmdna | Thanks! I worked on a project to see if there was enough ag land in SLO county to supply all craft breweries with hops (all hypothetical ,of-course) so I had to update tags for all craft breweries in SLO cnty to extract from overpass. |
| j03lar50n | that's so freaking awesome. keep on rocking it, yo! |
|
| 39561529 | j03lar50n | nice adds! |
| jsauder | Thanks j03lar50n! |
|
| 36687018 | j03lar50n | :thumbsup: |
|
| 36642218 | j03lar50n | Thanks (again), John! |
|
| 36642199 | j03lar50n | Thanks, John! |
|
| 35994426 | j03lar50n | not 'Cheda Ranch' as changeset comment indicates...my bad. It is beach access. |
|
| 35540075 | j03lar50n | nice add, thanks! |
|
| 35229163 | j03lar50n | please use 'local_knowledge' instead of 'Local knowledge' for your Value in the Source Key. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=local_knowledge#values |
|
| 34049002 | j03lar50n | why didn't you add this information to the existing building way? How do you know Rancho Grande Subaru occupies that specific location? |
|
| 26356220 | j03lar50n | The way that you've imported individual parcels as landuse=residential is questionable as to how effective & worthwhile it really has been. Why not just hand-draw ways around the entire block and tag landuse=residential? Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61148678This has resulted in ... |
|
| 30105847 | j03lar50n | Lance, looks good. Remember to 'square' your buildings with the 'Q' key in JOSM |
|
| 29894291 | j03lar50n | please use the keyboard shortcut 'Q' with JOSM to Orthogonalize Shape https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Shortcuts |
|
| 28826550 | j03lar50n | I think A74 is more appropriate than A51 for this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10535225 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm |
| j03lar50n | I think A51 is more appropriate than A41 for this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10552398 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm |
|
| 27963476 | neuhausr | hey just wondering why you're adding nodes only tagged with josm/ignore on them? if it's notes for yourself, maybe there are better ways to do it? |
| j03lar50n | @neuhausr thank you for this catch. This is an honest mistake we've made in which we did not adjust a setting in our JOSM Remote Control to 'Download objects to new layer' when we're using HOTOSM's Task Manager. We will fix this right now, thanks again. |
|
| 27921381 | j03lar50n | I think you can delete this node. Duplicate. Way already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96026787 |
|
| 24036473 | j03lar50n | How do you know this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200341595 is content=water ? |