| Changeset | No. | Date | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50706322 by oranv | 1 | 2017-07-31 14:01:52 UTC | j03lar50n | Interesting! I didn't know about this route. Thanks 👍 |
| 50116764 by cjohn105 | 1 | 2017-07-07 20:04:10 UTC | karitotp | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Could you please share the source for these highways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505911060/history? They do not match with the satellite imagery. ThanksKarito |
| 2 | 2017-07-08 00:41:22 UTC | j03lar50n | Hi cjohn105 and karitotp. Yes, welcome to OSM, cjohn105. It looks like you have digitizing tracks that perhaps fire equipment made during the suppression of a wildfire, sometime around 2011 ... as per this source tms:http://gis.slocounty.ca.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Aerials/2011_Combined_WGSWMAS/MapS... | |
| 49732985 by ghelete | 1 | 2017-06-22 02:19:41 UTC | j03lar50n | wow, looking better in DT SLO! |
| 49439377 by TheDutchMan13 | 1 | 2017-06-12 17:05:16 UTC | j03lar50n | Thank you, TheDutchMan13. I'm curious how this inquiry came in to you? I don't see it as a Note. |
| 2 | 2017-06-29 01:13:30 UTC | TheDutchMan13 | http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ritarocks | |
| 3 | 2017-06-29 01:13:53 UTC | TheDutchMan13 | This user sent me a private message on osm | |
| 4 | 2017-06-29 01:15:24 UTC | TheDutchMan13 | My apologies for not getting back to you sooner. | |
| 48775343 by hpanno | 1 | 2017-05-17 23:24:39 UTC | j03lar50n | w00t 🙌 |
| 2 | 2017-05-17 23:37:36 UTC | hpanno | Back at it! | |
| 48327144 by Richard | 1 | 2017-05-03 15:37:04 UTC | j03lar50n | >Most of this area just wants deleting tbhugh, yeah...because of all the poor landuse/landcover imports? |
| 2 | 2017-05-03 15:42:51 UTC | Richard | I was thinking more the really rough TIGER roads around the oilfield - most rural TIGER highway=residentials are an approximation at best, but this bunch is really bad and actively misleading. If all the oilfield roads were deleted, and a few access roads traced afresh, the map would be a lot better... | |
| 47078716 by zhackney | 1 | 2017-03-22 21:37:02 UTC | j03lar50n | I would suggest changing the road type and possibly only removing the name tag, instead of deleting the entire feature. Having driveways included in the road network can assist with routing. |
| 2 | 2017-03-23 06:53:19 UTC | srividya_c | @zhackney and @ j03lar50nI have reverted the changeset at #47087298 changeset. @zhackney do improve the existing highways and not delete them if it exists in imagery. | |
| 46970755 by FranBoiii | 1 | 2017-03-19 16:01:00 UTC | j03lar50n | Hello, are you certain this is a park? Does it have a name? |
| 46701835 by dcwiggin13 | 1 | 2017-03-09 19:22:01 UTC | j03lar50n | Hello, your edit was reverted by another member of the local SLO OpenStreetMap community. The flooding may be a temporary situation, but it's not a permanent feature and not an appropriate addition. Please let us know if you have any questions - we're glad to help! |
| 46353406 by e*holtz | 1 | 2017-02-24 02:53:00 UTC | j03lar50n | thanks for cleaning up those vineyard tags! |
| 46328558 by fulmar2 | 1 | 2017-02-23 15:05:33 UTC | j03lar50n | Awesome! You continue to make great additions to our local OSM - thank you!! |
| 45959501 by edson b | 1 | 2017-02-10 22:30:14 UTC | j03lar50n | Hello, can you explain this edit? It does not seem appropriate from my evaluation of the aerial imagery for this area. Please advise. |
| 45220427 by Bman | 1 | 2017-01-17 14:29:10 UTC | j03lar50n | Hello, what exactly are you up to with all the edits you're making on this campground? I am not seeing any benefits gained from your edits and believed the data was already in a good/usable state. I am local to this area and have worked with others to map this in-person. Please advise your intention... |
| 2 | 2017-01-18 07:20:47 UTC | Bman | Hi @j03lar50n, my apologies for the multiple edits with no visible changes.In short, I was originally trying to improve things, then realized I made a mistake and tried to get things back to the way they originally looked on OSM tiles.I initially noticed that they all had identical addr:*, and w... | |
| 44356961 by e*holtz | 1 | 2016-12-13 15:39:46 UTC | j03lar50n | Nice! Thanks, bro |
| 41612271 by manings | 1 | 2016-08-22 15:46:26 UTC | j03lar50n | Thank you so much for this fix! |
| 40071280 by e*holtz | 1 | 2016-06-17 03:26:48 UTC | j03lar50n | nice add! |
| 39829462 by edgrmdna | 1 | 2016-06-11 02:02:42 UTC | j03lar50n | nice adds! |
| 2 | 2016-06-14 04:25:33 UTC | edgrmdna | Thanks! I worked on a project to see if there was enough ag land in SLO county to supply all craft breweries with hops (all hypothetical ,of-course) so I had to update tags for all craft breweries in SLO cnty to extract from overpass. | |
| 3 | 2016-06-16 03:53:57 UTC | j03lar50n | that's so freaking awesome. keep on rocking it, yo! | |
| 39561529 by jsauder | 1 | 2016-05-30 20:42:18 UTC | j03lar50n | nice adds! |
| 2 | 2016-05-31 02:19:07 UTC | jsauder | Thanks j03lar50n! | |
| 36687018 by chadbunn | 1 | 2016-01-19 20:21:21 UTC | j03lar50n | :thumbsup: |
| 36642218 by jfire | 1 | 2016-01-18 17:20:58 UTC | j03lar50n | Thanks (again), John! |
| 36642199 by jfire | 1 | 2016-01-18 17:19:05 UTC | j03lar50n | Thanks, John! |
| 35994426 by j03lar50n | 1 | 2015-12-16 18:13:42 UTC | j03lar50n | not 'Cheda Ranch' as changeset comment indicates...my bad. It is beach access. |
| 35540075 by chris@zontine | 1 | 2015-11-24 21:50:21 UTC | j03lar50n | nice add, thanks! |
| 35229163 by JonCPSU | 1 | 2015-11-11 18:16:37 UTC | j03lar50n | please use 'local_knowledge' instead of 'Local knowledge' for your Value in the Source Key. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=local_knowledge#values |
| 34049002 by bwarren | 1 | 2015-09-17 06:34:58 UTC | j03lar50n | why didn't you add this information to the existing building way? How do you know Rancho Grande Subaru occupies that specific location? |
| 26356220 by nmixter | 1 | 2015-06-12 22:06:50 UTC | j03lar50n | The way that you've imported individual parcels as landuse=residential is questionable as to how effective & worthwhile it really has been. Why not just hand-draw ways around the entire block and tag landuse=residential? Example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61148678This has resulted in ... |
| 30105847 by LanceEchols | 1 | 2015-04-17 15:52:06 UTC | j03lar50n | Lance, looks good. Remember to 'square' your buildings with the 'Q' key in JOSM |
| 29894291 by nickher | 1 | 2015-04-01 06:30:37 UTC | j03lar50n | please use the keyboard shortcut 'Q' with JOSM to Orthogonalize Shape https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Shortcuts |
| 28826550 by MannequinBaby | 1 | 2015-02-13 19:44:00 UTC | j03lar50n | I think A74 is more appropriate than A51 for this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10535225 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm |
| 2 | 2015-02-13 19:50:56 UTC | j03lar50n | I think A51 is more appropriate than A41 for this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10552398 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm | |
| 27963476 by Estrada92 | 1 | 2015-01-09 16:05:43 UTC | neuhausr | hey just wondering why you're adding nodes only tagged with josm/ignore on them? if it's notes for yourself, maybe there are better ways to do it? |
| 2 | 2015-01-09 16:59:39 UTC | j03lar50n | @neuhausr thank you for this catch. This is an honest mistake we've made in which we did not adjust a setting in our JOSM Remote Control to 'Download objects to new layer' when we're using HOTOSM's Task Manager. We will fix this right now, thanks again. | |
| 27921381 by chadbunn | 1 | 2015-01-04 22:36:36 UTC | j03lar50n | I think you can delete this node. Duplicate. Way already exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96026787 |
| 24036473 by Estrada92 | 1 | 2014-11-10 16:32:48 UTC | j03lar50n | How do you know this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200341595 is content=water ? |