6 changesets created by paul1928 have been discussed with 9 replies of this contributor
Changeset # Tmstmp UTC Contributor Comment
53970563
by paul1928
@ 2017-11-21 09:26
12021-03-03 22:24Bert Araali
♦98
Hello, in some recent scans we did regarding the use of road and road_name we noticed this changeset. Could you change or delete the road_name key please, it doesn't seem to add additional information as already in the name key and it interferes with quality tools.
Greetings,
Bert Araali
22021-12-30 10:04user_5359
♦19,400
Hello! Second attempt (from a different perspective): You have used a lot of non-OSM standard keys, which may only be log data from a GPX device. Is this data still useful or can it be deleted?
32021-12-30 10:29paul1928 Apologies, I didn't see the first comment. This edit was four years ago and I don't remember a lot about it. If there is excess data then yes, it can almost certainly be deleted. I'll clean up the road_name value now.
42021-12-30 10:32paul1928 Having a closer look at the excess data, that was all there before I modified the way as far as I recall. All I did was re-align it to be closer to reality based on multiple GPS tracks taken.
112630815
by paul1928
@ 2021-10-18 00:39
12021-10-18 00:40paul1928 I also need to re-survey this as the top two sections have apparently been re-created, despite closure by Parks. OSM should reflect what's on the ground.
57098548
by paul1928
@ 2018-03-12 04:31
12019-08-31 00:42tonyf1
♦471
Hi Paul
I looked for Way: 568831737, all I could find was bits of old animal tracks. I am surprised it has disappeared in a year. How would you feel about me deleting it?
Tony
22019-08-31 01:41paul1928 Hey Tony,
Great to find someone checking my work! :) But what's way 568831737? I can't see it.
32019-08-31 01:46paul1928 Sorry, now I see it. Yes, it wouldn't surprise me if the final southern part down to Syphon is overgrown. It was quite distinct until the final descent to Syphon where it became quite indistinct. If you couldn't see it I'd suggest pruning it back to finish further north just as it pas...
42019-08-31 01:47tonyf1
♦471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568831737

Its in Churchill Park under the power lines between Ridge Tk and Syphon Walk
52019-08-31 01:49tonyf1
♦471
I only went as high as the pylon
62019-08-31 01:53paul1928 So was it the southern section from Syphon to the Pylon that was indistinct or the northern section from the pylon to Ridge that was indistinct?
72019-08-31 02:03tonyf1
♦471
the southern section from Syphon to the Pylon was indistinct, I may get out there tomorrow to look at the Ridge tk end
82019-08-31 02:11paul1928 Yep, kill it then. :) That doesn't surprise me.
92019-09-01 05:08tonyf1
♦471
I looked at Ridge Tk and the intersection with Way: 39245854. Couldn't find it so deleting it.
51073352
by paul1928
@ 2017-08-13 06:46
12017-09-14 14:36Ewen Hill
♦407
Thanks for all the Dandy Ranges updates Paul. It's really improved immensely.
22017-09-15 22:33paul1928 Thanks Ewen! :)
49348193
by paul1928
@ 2017-06-07 20:55
12017-06-08 06:00Omegaville
♦1
Might be "public demand" but it's hardly official.
22017-06-08 13:43Rhubarb
♦10
The name has not officially been changed, an article referencing google map's error: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-08/google-prematurely-renames-margaret-court-arena/8600168
32017-06-08 21:57paul1928 Agreed - it's been put back.
46295890
by paul1928
@ 2017-02-22 06:21
12017-03-01 22:58tonyf1
♦471
Hi, thanks for your recent edits and detailed changeset descriptions. I note that you changed the access tag for Ant Track and added some new bike tracks. You may not be aware that these tracks are illegal and Parks can prosecute users. I think it is better if they are tagged access=no. As a guide, ...
22017-03-01 23:28paul1928 Hey Tony. Thanks for the feedback and link to the in-depth discussion. I'll go through and change access=no for all the illegal tracks I've recently added. Your right, Parks have clearly sign-posted (although they tend not to last for long) a number of these tracks as illegal and have gene...